Professional Documents
Culture Documents
THE www.ies.org.sg
SINGAPORE
ENGINEER
November 2019 | MCI (P) 105/03/2019
COVER STORY:
Structural excellence created through
safe processes and solutions
PLUS
INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT & OPERATION: Year in Infrastructure 2019 Awards presented at ceremony and gala
PROJECT APPLICATION: Reimagining the Eiffel Tower landscape using BIM
HEALTH & SAFETY ENGINEERING: A Study of Protective Features in Singapore’s Buildings - Part 3 (Barriers and Drivers)
Have your competency recognised!
I BUILD ON
EXPERIENCE
I see the possibilities my career
can bring. Because a career in the built
environment is one that can create direct
yet far-reaching impact. At BCA, my work
on policy measures help to drive change in
the built environment sector and make a
positive difference.
COVER STORY
14 Structural excellence created through safe processes
and solutions
Tanjong Pagar Centre was a Winner of the Design and
Engineering Safety Excellence Award 2018 at BCA
AWARDS 2018.
INFRASTRUCTURE 14
DEVELOPMENT & OPERATION
22 Year in Infrastructure 2019 Awards presented at
ceremony and gala
The achievements of users of Bentley Systems’
software, in advancing design, construction and
operation of infrastructure throughout the world,
received recognition.
22
PROJECT APPLICATION
28 Achieving higher productivity and output
A compact milling machine mills an entire road
pavement in Mexico, for the implementation of a new
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system.
28
President Publications Manager Editorial Panel Design & layout by 2EZ Asia Pte Ltd
Prof Yeoh Lean Weng Desmond Teo Dr Chandra Segaran
Cover designed by Irin Kuah
desmond@iesnet.org.sg Prof Simon Yu
Chief Editor Dr Ang Keng Been Cover images:
T Bhaskaran Publications Executive Dr Victor Sim Main image by Ying Yi Photography
t_b_n8@yahoo.com Queek Jiayu Mr Syafiq Shahul Inset images by Arup
jiayu@iesnet.org.sg Published by
Media Representative
MultiNine Corporation Pte Ltd The Institution of Engineers, Singapore
70 Bukit Tinggi Road, Singapore 289758
sales@multi9.com.sg Tel: 6469 5000 I Fax: 6467 1108
Printed in Singapore
PROJECT APPLICATION
30 Tennis centre design combines tradition and
modernity
Project-specific formwork solutions were required for
the dome-shaped building.
32 Reimagining the Eiffel Tower landscape using BIM
Earlier this year, the City of Paris announced the
winning proposal to redevelop the ‘grand site’.
30
HEALTH & SAFETY ENGINEERING
35 A Study of Protective Features in Singapore’s
Buildings - Part 3 (Barriers and Drivers)
In this last part of the three-part series, the barriers
and drivers influencing the adoption of protective
features are presented.
REGULAR SECTIONS
04 INDUSTRY NEWS
13 EVENTS
45 IES UPDATE
32
The Singapore Engineer is published monthly by The Institution of Engineers, Singapore (IES). The publication is distributed free-of-charge
to IES members and affiliates. Views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the Editor or IES. All rights reserved.
No part of this magazine shall be reproduced, mechanically or electronically, without the prior consent of IES. Whilst every care is taken
to ensure accuracy of the content at press time, IES will not be liable for any discrepancies. Unsolicited contributions are welcome but
their inclusion in the magazine is at the discretion of the Editor.
At the official opening of PLQ are, from left to right, Ms Ng Hsueh Ling, Managing Director, Singapore and Chief Investment Officer, Asia, Lendlease;
Mr Tony Lombardo, Chief Executive Officer, Asia, Lendlease; Mr Steve McCann, Group Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director, Lendlease; Mr
Lawrence Wong, Minister for National Development and Second Minister for Finance; Mr Bruce Gosper, the High Commissioner of of Australia in
Singapore; and Mr Richard Paine, Managing Director, Paya Lebar Quarter by Lendlease.
Developed by Lendlease, Paya Lebar Quarter (PLQ) was tion of Paya Lebar Central, a 12-hectare centrally located
officially opened recently, at an event graced by Guest-of- sub-regional hub, into a dynamic and vibrant business
Honour, Mr Lawrence Wong, Minister for National Devel- and lifestyle precinct.
opment and Second Minister for Finance, and Mr Bruce
Gosper, High Commissioner of Australia in Singapore. With the completion of PLQ, the 22,000-strong work-
force within a seven-minute walking radius of PLQ and
Mr Wong and Mr Gosper joined Mr Steve McCann, one million residents in the trade area (Urbis Retail
Group Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director, Market Study, March 2015) can now enjoy the 100,000
Lendlease, and Mr Tony Lombardo, Chief Executive ft2 of green spaces across the precinct. PLQ also sup-
Officer, Asia, Lendlease, to mark the opening by activat- ports Singapore’s car-lite vision, with its connectivity,
ing a vertical domino show which gradually unveiled the direct links to the dual-line Paya Lebar MRT interchange
Paya Lebar Quarter logo against the songket-inspired and seamless connection to the wider Park Connector
backdrop. PLQ’s distinctive architecture and design, Network.
inspired by the intricate weaving patterns of the songket,
a traditional brocade textile from the Malay culture, is Following the domino show was the first-ever joint
also visible from the building facades to public realm fea- performance by the Singapore Symphony Orchestra and
tures. Apart from aligning with the rich Malay heritage of the Melbourne Symphony Orchestra - a musical collab-
the area, the design language helps to unify the buildings oration echoing the Singapore-Australia connection in
and public areas into a single tapestry that authentically Lendlease’s largest project in Singapore.
reflects the community PLQ sits within. “Urban regeneration is a key pillar of Lendlease’s strat-
The domino show signified the delivery of the SGD 3.7 egy. Every day around the world, we work with cities
billion, 4-hectare landmark urban regeneration develop- and governments to create the best places. Today, we
ment by Lendlease, which will catalyse the transforma- have before us a truly world-class example of what can
be achieved when government and companies such as One initiative is an upcoming collaboration between
Lendlease partner with local communities to deliver PLQ, Health Promotion Board and anchor tenant Vir-
game-changing urbanisation projects that will leave a gin Active to host complimentary health and wellness
positive legacy for the community for generations to activities at PLQ to improve the health and well-being
come”, said Mr McCann. of residents as well as building a healthy and vibrant
workplace community.
Centrally located business and lifestyle hub PLQ has also been engaging with schools in the area
Home to Lendlease’s new Asia headquarters, PLQ’s and is partnering a secondary school for the next
900,000 ft2 of Grade A office spaces, available across three years to enable their students to learn about
three towers, and 200 retail shops, are almost fully sustainability using PLQ as a case study. Other initia-
leased, while its residential component, Park Place Res- tives are also in the works, including the creation of
idences, had only one unit left before the expected TOP an online portal to support sustainability education by
in November. schools.
PLQ Workplace is now home to 18 multinational corpo- On the employment front, PLQ previously partnered with
rations and leading Singapore organisations, including Workforce Singapore for a job fair, showcasing jobs at
UOB, Sabre Asia Pacific, Roche Singapore, Obayashi PLQ, bringing jobs closer to homes and enabling employ-
Singapore and Tokyo Electron Singapore. Lendlease’s ment and upskilling.
inaugural flexible workplace solution, csuites, which
combines the benefits of premier corpo-
rate offices with the advantages of shared
services and collaborative spaces offered
by co-working products, has received much
interest from the market, and is set to wel-
come German multinational pharmaceutical
and life sciences company, Bayer.
As the heart of a new lifestyle precinct and
the social heart of the Paya Lebar commu-
nity, PLQ offers a line-up of exciting retail
offerings.
Living up to its vision of one place, many mo-
ments, PLQ Mall also offers a multi-layered
experience for the community - from book
exchange spots, quirky photo booths, Insta-
gram-worthy backdrops, interactive activity/
play areas and a Cine-Mini installation.
“We set out with a mission to create one
of the best and most progressive places for
Singapore, with PLQ. Today, we are proud to
say that we have achieved this mission, with
the support from the community, tenants
and partners. Moving forward, our goal will
be to create a community fabric in the area
to bring everyone who lives, works and plays
here together”, said Mr Lombardo.
CONEXPO-CON/AGG 2020
and IFPE 2020 to highlight ‘Smart City’ and education
A 10 ft by 22 ft smart city replica will be on display at are grouped into tracks that will include the following
CONEXPO-CON/AGG 2020 which will be held in Las subjects:
Vegas, USA, from 10 to 14 March 2020 and will demon- • Aggregates
strate how a smart city, through sensors and analytics,
• Asphalt
will be able to transform information into digestible data,
providing knowledge for the city to work smarter. The • Concrete
replica will showcase several scenarios including: • Cranes, rigging and aerial lifts
• Different city grids and how a city responds to heat, • Earthmoving and site development
wind and storms.
• Connectivity in the city, including 5G, sensors, telemat- CONEXPO-CON/AGG
ics and IOT. Held every three years, CONEXPO-CON/AGG is a lead-
• The construction jobsite of the future within the city ing event for construction industry professionals. The
and how equipment will communicate. show features the latest equipment, products, services
“Our goal for the Tech Experience in 2020 is to show and technologies for the construction industry, as well
contractors how all of these exciting new technologies as industry-leading education. CONEXPO-CON/AGG will
will impact their current work, how the expectations and cover developments in asphalt, aggregates, concrete,
demands of customers will change and how the current earthmoving, lifting, mining, utilities and related industry
state of infrastructure may change”, said Al Cevero, Se- segments.
nior Vice President, Construction, Mining & Utility, at the More information on CONEXPO-CON/AGG may be ob-
Association of Equipment Manufacturers (AEM). tained from www.conexpoconagg.com.
Structural excellence
created through safe processes and solutions
Guoco Tower was a Winner of the Design and Engineering Safety Excellence Award 2018 at the
BCA AWARDS 2018, among many other accolades.
Figure 6: Column nodes and reinforced plates in the corewall at Level 6. Image by Arup.
ening which affected the floor construction. Due to the was recommended that a comprehensive wind tunnel
connection of the column to floor level as it progressed test be carried out.
upwards, in-place analysis of the building model was
The model for the wind tunnel test represented an area
considered to be a conservative approach. Non-linear
with a radius of about 500 m from the proposed site and
analysis of the building’s lateral stability was considered
included future developments adjacent to the site. Two
to be more accurate in predicting the internal stresses
separate tests were conducted and it was found that the
due to the construction sequence.
loading due to wind, obtained from the tests, was signifi-
At the office and residential tower, the southern face cantly higher than code-prescribed values (Figure 13).
slopes to Level 6 from the office roof, and the slope This is likely due to a few factors such as the presence of
changes to the opposite direction till Level 1, so that the adjacent buildings and proximity to the sea.
columns fall outside the first reserve line of the Railway
Protection Zone. At Level 39, the residential tower stands Design features for safe inspection and
on the northern half tower footprint. maintenance
The first feature would induce the building to sway Special markers at beam soffit were introduced to the
towards the south as the floors progressed upwards and post-tensioned beams in the office tower to highlight the
more loads were imposed. locations of tendons so that they are not damaged due to
future works. Easy identification during inspection would
On the other hand, the loads from the residential tower, be crucial to protect the tendons which are in tension.
being eccentric to the central core, would cause the
building to sway towards the north. Thus, the building All the roofs of the buildings were designed with main-
will start to shift to the south due to gravity loads as tainability in mind. This is especially important given the
the upper floors were built, while the sway switched requirement for flexibility in the use of the spaces. The ac-
direction when the residential tower construction cess walkways were integrated into the design of the roof
commenced. This behaviour of the building is crucial to crown and canopies, for regular maintenance services.
the serviceability state as both human comfort and lift
A telescopic boom on rail was proposed for maintenance
performance are affected. Sensitivity studies were car-
of the building façade at height. The support for this
ried out, including both linear and non-linear analysis, to
boom accounts for the forces imposed during operation.
ensure the critical behaviour and force were considered
and accounted for. Pre-setting of the corewall was also
prescribed, as a result of comprehensive analysis, based Multiple safety-first measures
on the team’s construction sequence. Multiple measures were put in place to review and eval-
uate the construction process to ensure safety during the
Enhancing structural safety and serviceability construction stage.
Due to the nature of super high-rise buildings, wind load During excavation of the three basements, in-soil instru-
is an important design parameter to be accounted for in ments such as inclinometers, vibrating wire piezometers,
the serviceability state. While the wind code prescribes water standpipes and ground settlement markers, and in-
a loading condition based on terrain, height and shape wall inclinometers were installed. These allowed ground
of the building, the actual site conditions may be more movement monitoring during the deep excavation,
influenced by proximity to other high-rise buildings. It against alert and work suspension levels, as prescribed.
Figure 13: Building movement and building performance when affected by winds. Image by Arup.
The basement of Guoco Tower directly connects to the Tanjong Pagar MRT station. Image by Ying Yi Photography.
A specialist took readings from the various monitoring closely followed comprehensive procedures outlined in
instruments and submitted daily reports. The results of the project execution plan for site works and clearly allo-
the readings were compared against the predicted move- cated the roles and responsibilities within the RSS team.
ment of the retaining wall and soil, and deviations from
prediction were highlighted. Deviations were reported The project team was committed to a high standard
to the design Qualified Person (QP) for re-analysis of the of safety as demonstrated by the involvement of the
excavation works and appropriate remedial measures QPs, QP supervisors and Project Manager in monthly
were carried out when necessary. The supervision team meetings with the RSS team to highlight any accidents,
monitored the progress of excavation to ensure that the suspected foul play and non-compliance. In a systematic
required struts/slabs were in place before further excava- manner, the list of non-conformance issues was moni-
tion was allowed. tored via an elaborate schedule.
Additional strain gauges and load cells were installed at Safety teams comprising Work Safety and Health Officers
column and wall locations of Basement 3, to monitor the and Safety Coordinators were deployed throughout the
load transmitted to the foundation during construction, site to ensure a safe working environment. Risk assess-
as well as after completion of building, and compare ments were carried out prior to commencement of work,
against predicted values. in accordance with Safe Work Procedures and Safety
Management Systems.
Monitoring of the MRT station and tracks was also carried
out, using real-time instruments which continuously re- Temporary design works were also carefully reviewed
turned the readings of the movements for checking against and endorsed by PEs, followed by strict and close super-
stringent displacement limits imposed by the authority. vision implemented throughout the entire construction
phase.
For the superstructures, verticality of the towers was
checked monthly and reported for every five storeys. The use of steel in construction safeguarded against
This was monitored, based on a designated hole on every environmental damage and facilitated easier erection
floor plate, and measured by laser beams. The measured compared to other construction methods.
lateral displacements were plotted onto a graph for com- As most of the steelworks at the podium and basement
parison with the predicted movement. were installed and erected during the day, there was
minimal impact to the neighbourhood during construc-
Construction safety and impact to surroundings tion. In addition, most of the steelworks were fabricat-
The construction site was ably managed by an experi- ed off-site, which helped to increase productivity and
enced resident site staff (RSS) team supervising a large ensured quality control.
competent team comprising Resident Engineers (REs) As the site is adjacent to existing buildings on all four
and Resident Technical Officers (RTOs). The RSS team sides, the construction method employed ensured safety
was responsible for reporting the safety risks on site and of the public. Catch platforms were installed at construc-
raised issues to the main contractor on a proactive and tion levels, and the use of steelworks along with deep
cooperative basis. decks and pre-formed formwork helped to avoid the
Inspectors were placed in the fabrication yards in both risk of falling objects - ultimately minimising risk to the
Tuas, Singapore and Johor Bahru, Malaysia. This team surrounding public areas.
Guoco Tower’s City Room in the Tanjong Pagar neighbourhood. Image by Ying Yi Photography.
Bentley Systems Incorporated, a leading global provid- Category: Digital Cities Award for Comprehensive
er of comprehensive software and digital twin cloud Roadway Digital Twins
services for advancing the design, construction, and
Winner: Shenzhen Highway Engineering Consultant
operations of infrastructure, held its Year in Infrastruc-
Co Ltd
ture 2019 Conference at Marina Bay Sands, Singapore,
from 21 to 24 October 2019. Project: Yangang East Interchange Project
The annual event brings together professionals from Location: Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
many industries around the globe to share innovative
practices in infrastructure project design, engineering,
construction, and operations.
Category: Digital Cities Award for Comprehensive
Bentley Systems acknowledged nine Special Recog- Water Digital Twins
nition Awards winners and 18 Year in Infrastructure
Awards winners at a ceremony and gala, held on 24 Winner: Águas do Porto, EM
October, at the conclusion of the Year in Infrastructure Project: H2PORTO Technological Platform for the Inte-
2019 Conference. grated Management of Porto’s Urban Water Cycle
Twelve independent jury panels of industry experts Location: Porto, Portugal
selected 54 finalists from 571 nominations submitted by
more than 440 organisations, in more than 60 coun-
tries, that use software from Bentley Systems.
Category: Advancing Infrastructure Resilience through
Digital Twins
WINNERS OF YEAR IN INFRASTRUCTURE 2019 Winner: Italferr SpA
SPECIAL RECOGNITION AWARDS Project: The New Polcevera Viaduct
Category: Advancing Urban Planning through Digital Location: Genova, Liguria, Italy
Twins
Winner: Civil Engineering and Development Depart-
ment, Hong Kong SAR Government and AECOM Category: Advancing Construction Industrialization
through Digital Twins
Project: The Town Plaza Urban Design Study for the
Establishment of the Kwu Tung North, New Develop- Winner: Heilongjiang Construction High-Tech Capital
ment Area Group Co Ltd
Project: Smart and Digital Application in Heilongjiang Con-
Location: Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
struction Industry Modernization Demonstration Park
Location: Harbin City, Heilongjiang Province, China
Category: Advancing Industrial Sustainability through
Digital Twins
Category: Advancing Economic Infrastructure through
Winner: MCC Capital Engineering & Research Incorpo- Digital Twins
ration Ltd
Winner: CCCC Water Transportation Consultants Co Ltd
Project: Henan Jiyuan Iron & Steel, 80MW High-Tem- (WTC)
perature Ultrahigh-Pressure Gas Power Generation
Project: SAPT Automatic Container Yard and Housing
Energy-Saving Renovation Project
Project in Pakistan
Location: Jiyuan, Henan Province, China Location: Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
Location: Singapore
Project: Detailed Design, Tendering and Project Man- Project: Hanjiang Yakou Shipping Hub Engineering
agement Services for Establishment of 12 IT/Hi-Tech Project
Parks in Bangladesh
Location: Yicheng, Hubei, China
Location: Bangladesh
Winners of Bentley Systems Year in Infrastructure 2019 Awards. Image by Graham Carlow.
Bentley Systems and Topcon Positioning Systems, a world we committed respectively to completing its software
leader in positioning technology for the survey and con- requirements. Indeed, our new software capabilities
struction industries, have announced that its new, jointly make possible construction digital twins - converging
owned company, Digital Construction Works, is open for digital context, digital components, and digital chronol-
business, with a full global staff of digital construction ogy. What remains, in going digital for infrastructure
experts from Bentley Systems and Topcon. construction, is for constructors’ people and processes
to take advantage of the technology. We and Topcon
Digital Construction Works provides digital automation,
have now in turn committed many of our best resources,
integration, and ‘twinning’ services around a portfolio
professionals experienced in both construction and soft-
of fit-for-purpose software and cloud services, from
ware, to serve shoulder-to-shoulder, in virtual hardhats,
Topcon, Bentley, and other software vendors, to realise
to innovatively advance the required digital integration.
the breakthrough potential of constructioneering, for
The Digital Construction Works joint-venture has the full
industrialising construction.
management and capital commitments of both our com-
The announcement, regarding the setting up of the panies, multiplying its unique strengths for helping to
joint-venture, was made at Bentley Systems’ Year In realise constructioneering’s potential to close the world’s
Infrastructure 2019 Conference in Singapore. infrastructure gap”.
Bentley Systems and Topcon joined forces in 2016, to Ray O’Connor, President and CEO of Topcon Positioning
jointly develop enhanced integration between their Systems, said, “What Topcon and Bentley Systems initi-
respective MAGNET and ProjectWise cloud services so ated in recent years was done in the spirit of changing
that engineering and construction workflows could be in- mindsets and processes on how we approach construc-
tegrated for improved project quality and performance. tion, and that collaboration has led to the development
Since then, Bentley and Topcon have continuously intro- of this joint-venture. The creation of Digital Construction
duced new ‘4D’ innovations in surveying, reality model- Works perfectly aligns with our focus of helping the
ling, scheduling and logistics, work packaging, machine industry succeed in meeting infrastructure demands
control, and progressive assurance for construction. In through technological innovations. Through the new or-
2017, they together opened Constructioneering Acade- ganisation, companies will have the opportunity to inte-
mies, including at Topcon’s ‘sandbox’ facilities globally, grate hardware and software capabilities to more quickly
for construction professionals to experience new digital and efficiently adopt new technology for more rapid
best practices, first-hand. During 2018, the companies as- productivity improvements. With customised services to
similated Bentley’s SYNCHRO and Topcon’s ClearEdge3D address the individual needs of an organisation, wide-
acquisitions into constructioneering offerings. spread adoption and technology improvements can be
more readily realised. We are excited to take this journey
Now, Digital Construction Works is chartered to embed with Bentley Systems in moving the industry forward”.
its experts within constructors’ major project teams to
advance and optimise constructioneering processes for
delivering better design-build outcomes. Through its
digital integration services, to connect and automate
constructors’ existing processes with constructioneering,
Digital Construction Works can make the projects better
while also helping to institutionalise these digital work-
flows throughout a constructor’s full project portfolio.
At the same time, experiences gained by Digital Con-
struction Works will help guide Bentley Systems and
Topcon in prioritising their constructioneering software
development investments.
Digital Construction Works is led by CEO Ted Lamboo,
previously Senior Vice President of Strategic Partnerships
for Bentley Systems, and COO Jason Hallett, formerly
Vice President of Digital Construction and Business De-
velopment for Topcon.
Digital Construction Works provides digital automation, integration,
Greg Bentley, CEO of Bentley Systems, said, “When we and ‘twinning’ services to help organisations realise the breakthrough
and Topcon recognised the opportunity for construc- potential of constructioneering, for industrialising construction. Image
tioneering to finally industrialise capital project delivery, by Digital Construction Works.
tions during asset lifecycles, for example, as-constructed ness intelligence, converging IT (GIS) with OT (telemetry,
buildings can be evaluated for seismic resilience (using SCADA instrumentation, sensors) and ET (hydraulic sim-
STAAD); the evacuation of vehicles and people in stations, ulation). WaterOPS provides real-time operational deci-
stadiums, and other public places can be assessed and op- sion support, extending SCADA (Supervisory Control and
timised (LEGION and CUBE); the impact of flooding events Data Acquisition) to help users monitor, maintain, and
like hurricanes can be determined (OpenFlows FLOOD); forecast various hydraulics and water quality scenarios.
and the suitability of subsurface conditions for urban proj-
ects can be ensured (PLAXIS, SoilVision). City planning digital twins
Digital twins for cities have many stakeholders, includ-
Introducing OpenGround ing constituents not directly involved in engineering or
Bentley’s geotechnical engineering and analysis appli- infrastructure. Now hosted in Microsoft Azure, OpenCi-
cations empower subsurface digital twins, critical for ties Planner delivers cloud-based, city-scale digital twins
assessing and managing risks in infrastructure projects to improve stakeholder and citizen engagement and to
and assets. Subsurface digital twins entail modelling of simplify and facilitate urban development. Addressing a
the underground environment, including the geology, wide variety of potential use cases, OpenCities Planner
hydrology, chemistry, and engineering properties, made helps users, through devices like web, mobile, touch-
possible by Bentley’s geotechnical offerings (PLAXIS, screens, and digital billboards, to intuitively visualise
SoilVision, Keynetix and gINT). To further enable subsur- and explore 2D, 3D, GIS and other data aligned with the
face digital twins, Bentley has announced OpenGround, a reality modeling of the city.
new cloud service (available end-2019) to store, manage,
report, and share data about natural ground conditions. DIGITAL CO-VENTURES FOR DIGITAL CITIES
Cloud-based photogrammetry processing powered by
Water network digital twins Bentley’s ContextCapture is incorporated in Topcon
Building upon its deep experience with hydraulics and MAGNET Collage Web, a web-based service for publica-
hydrology software, Bentley is introducing OpenFlows tion, sharing, and analysis of reality capture data. The in-
WaterOPS for water and wastewater utility operators. trinsic Bentley ContextCapture Cloud Processing Service
OpenFlows WaterOPS provides water and wastewater enables operators to upload UAV imagery direct-to-web
utilities with real-time operational support, smart water without the need for high-end hardware requirements or
response planning, and optimised performance and busi- IT constraints.
Working parameters
Milling depth - 25 cm to 30 cm
Milling width - 1.8 m
Equipment used - Wirtgen W 150 CF compact
milling machine with
1.800 mm milling drum
Multiplex system with up to four ultrasonic sensors.
Triangular recesses were taken into consideration for the thin reinforced concrete slab. With different heights of up to 11 m, these feature up to 120
circular openings, each with a diameter of 20 cm. They form a fine net which allows natural sunlight through the subsequently integrated glass blocks
in the interior of the tennis centre.
As part of the Kuwait University’s Student Activities mosaics made of limestone, triangular recesses were tak-
and Athletic Facilities Project (SAAF) in Al-Shadadiya, an en into consideration for the construction. The recesses
indoor tennis centre is being realised. The training centre have been positioned at different heights of up to 11 m
will provide athletes and students with an area of 7,100 m2, and have up to 120 circular openings with diameters of
in order to carry out their daily training activities. In 20 cm. These form a fine net that allows natural sun-
addition, the building also has three floors and space for light to pass through the subsequently integrated glass
around 2,000 spectators. Externally, the sports venue blocks, into the interior of the tennis centre. As a result,
impresses with its dome-shaped roof in the style of tradi- the sports venue with its diameter of over 80 m will be
tional Islamic architecture. illuminated in a unique way.
PERI planned and delivered a project-specific solution for
facilitating the efficient execution of the architecturally Customised design
sophisticated dome-shaped building. In order to fulfil the vision of Skidmore, Owings & Merrill,
the architects, Gulf Consultants, Kuwait University and
The SAAF is part of the new campus of Kuwait Univer-
construction company Societe d’Enterprise & de Gestion
sity, whose plans were developed back in 2004. Upon
(SEG Qatar) put their trust in the experience of PERI engi-
completion, the new campus will bring together all 16
neers, gained in the area of free-form formwork.
faculties of the university and its 40,000 students at one
central location over an area covering 600 hectares. A to- Engineers from the technical office of the PERI Group
tal of seven different colleges will be accommodated on in Germany designed the 3D building models as well
the area - from the College of Art and College of Business as 3D plans on the basis of the building plans. For
through to the College of Architecture. Furthermore, constructing the complex, curved reinforced concrete
students will have access to additional facilities such as walls with differently sized box-outs along with varying
the indoor tennis centre. wall thicknesses between 20 cm and 30 cm, custom-
ised 3D special formwork elements were used. In the
The facade of the 25 m high tennis centre was construct-
process, the statically load-bearing elements were
ed using eight concreting heights. For the later refine-
based on the VARIO GT 24 Girder Wall Formwork.
ment of the thin reinforced concrete slab with Trencadis
After site personnel had undergone comprehensive
Digital modelling of the site and designs ing and reduced potential errors. Thus, the members of
In 2018, Autodesk announced a partnership with the City the jury were able to virtually immerse themselves in
of Paris to use building information modelling (BIM) to the designs to visualise all the proposed developments
create a 3D model of the Tower’s grand site - all 2.4 km2 but also to feel and experience the future journey of
of it. Working with WSP and Gexpertise, Autodesk cre- visitors. We congratulate the City of Paris for their
ated the largest urban model of its kind, complete with commitment to this digital challenge, the winning team
buildings, roads and infrastructure, pedestrian zones and and all the finalists for adopting methods that illustrate
street crossings, urban furniture and green areas. The the future of architecture and construction industries”,
model was unveiled in May 2018, along with the names said Nicolas Mangon, VP Business & Marketing AEC at
of the four teams shortlisted in the competition. Autodesk.
Autodesk worked closely with the teams over the last By visualising the designs in 3D before they are built, the
year to help them visualise their designs, giving them ac- City of Paris anticipates a reduction in errors, greater
cess to a simplified version of the 3D model in Autodesk clarity and collaboration with the winning team, and
Infraworks, to use during the different stages of the an opportunity to involve the public in the process. The
process. Autodesk also held workshops to help the teams 3D models were also used by the jury panel during final
collaborate internally and understand the challenges of judging to better understand the four proposals in a
the existing site, as well as to define the working meth- common format and to experience the site changes like a
ods for the integration of the models. future visitor.
“Autodesk is proud to have supported the City of Paris The renovation of the Eiffel Tower area is expected to be
and the four selected teams for one year in this com- completed in time for the 2024 Summer Olympics. The
petitive dialogue around this large-scale project, unique makeover will not be just cosmetic. This revitalisation will
in the world. The use of an intelligent digital model, im- help the City of Paris address growing challenges related
mersive 3D visualisation tools and collaborative meth- to energy, greening, supply networks, mobility, logistics,
odologies have significantly accelerated decision-mak- waste management, security, and flooding.
Vision 2030 masterplan. Image by Gustafson Porter + Bowman. The Pont d’Iéna Bridge re-greened as a planted promenade. Image by MIR.
and designers in incorporating protective features in new In addition, contractual obligations may also promote
development projects. They may not have worked on any the practice of incorporating protective features. Fussey
past projects which require the implementation of securi- (2011) stated that the building owner’s duty of care
ty measures, thereby impeding them from doing so. The could be interpreted to also take into account acts of
lack of technical expertise among building designers, in terrorism. This could prompt developers and designers
the domain of security, may also impede the incorporation to adopt protective designs in their buildings to avoid
of protective features in buildings. claims arising from negligence.
In summary, the 14 barriers identified that may impede Another possible driver could be the presence of
the incorporation of protective features are: incentives. Harre-Young, Bosher, Dainty & Glass (2012)
• Not required under regulations and laws reported that decisions to implement protective features
in buildings were taken not only as a counter-terrorism
• Not required under contract measure but also due to their underlying incentives and
• Lack of government funding benefits. These incentives included enhanced property
• Insufficient support from upper management and and developer reputation, and reductions in risk. Rouse
stakeholders (2004) added that an increased value to businesses also
• Low level of implementation in the industry incentivises building owners to incorporate protective
features in buildings, which included value-adding factors
• High initial and upfront costs such as greater revenue generation opportunities and
• High operating costs competitive advantages (Harre-Young, Bosher, Dainty &
• Perceive threat of terrorism as unreal and improbable Glass, 2012). White & Cochrane (2017) also agreed that
the incorporation of protective features may improve the
• Unavailability of best practices guidelines
development’s marketability and hence increase its sale
• Uncertainty of the effectiveness of protective features and lease value.
• Lack of awareness of the protective features available
Providing accreditation and recognition to developments
• Lack of technical expertise and advice that incorporate protective features in the design phase
• Lack of experience in previous projects of the project could be a motivating factor for develop-
• Aesthetic implications of protective features (obtrusive ers (White & Cochrane, 2017). For instance, the Building
and unfriendly) Security Accreditation scheme launched by the City
of London Crime Prevention Association (2014) pro-
vides recognition for buildings that devote resources to
DRIVERS TO INCORPORATING PROTECTIVE maintain and ensure security for its occupants. Similarly,
FEATURES the United Kingdom’s Building Research Establishment
On the other hand, some researchers have also suggest- Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) also
ed drivers that spur building owners and consultants to awards credits to developments that factor in protective
incorporate protective features early in the developmen- features in the design of the building. By attaining such
tal process. Harre-Young, Bosher, Dainty & Glass (2012) recognition, developers may be more enticed to incor-
conducted a study on the various factors that affect porate protective features into the building design as it
the integration of security into the building design, and increases the property’s marketability.
found that regulations and local policies are the greatest
influencing factors. For instance, critical infrastructural The provision of government subsidies and funding for
projects in Singapore are required to undertake a securi- developers may also drive the practice of incorporating
ty review during the design process of the development, protective features in buildings. By providing funding
programmes to reduce the initial cost of implement-
thereby pushing for the early integration of building
ing protective features, building owners may be more
security in high-risk projects.
inclined to adopt such practices.
Correspondingly, Singapore introduced the Infrastructure
The driving force for incorporating protective features in
Protection Act in October 2017 (Yusof, 2017). The Act
buildings could also stem from the organisation’s stance
will require designated new building developments with
on corporate social responsibility (CSR). Organisations
a gross floor area exceeding 100,000 m2 to incorporate
with a strong company culture may recognise the threat
security measures in their design before construction
of terrorism as a social responsibility issue and hence,
begins. Similarly, selected existing buildings undergoing
embed protective features into their development proj-
major renovations will also be required to incorporate
ects to protect their occupants.
security measures in their plans. However, the Act does
not apply to every new project development. Instead, Harre-Young, Bosher, Dainty & Glass (2012) also found
the Minister will be given the authority to designate and that the support and commitment of the stakeholders
select the buildings that are required to comply with the involved in the project was another influencing factor for
Act, based on its symbolic significance, location, footfall the implementation of protective features in buildings. If
and other considerations. The Infrastructure Protection stakeholders provided their full support, greater amount
Act therefore provides a clear regulatory framework to of resources could be allocated to the incorporation of
fight terrorism by driving and mandating the incorpora- protective features. Normative pressures may also be
tion of security measures in buildings. a driver for the implementation of protective features
in buildings. Building owners and consultants may be • Reduce security retrofitting costs
pressured by social norms and thereby follow industry • Developers are conscious of corporate social respon-
and competitors’ practices of incorporating protective sibility (CSR) and recognise the value of incorporating
features. protective features in their building design
In addition, building owners and consultants who are • Seen favorable results achieved by other building projects
aware of the effectiveness of protective features in
enhancing the security of the building against threats INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
of terrorism may be more inclined to implement them
(Harre-Young, Bosher, Dainty & Glass, 2009). Having The institutional theory is increasingly being employed to
seen favourable results from past projects which have understand the construction industry, such as in the case
incorporated protective features, building owners and of ethics (Low, Gao, Che-Ani & Siah, 2014) and post-proj-
consultants may also change their understanding and ect reviews (Chin, Gao & Low, 2015). It is also appropri-
perceptions and thereby be encouraged to strive for a ate to use the institutional theory to better understand
protective building design. the behaviour relating to the incorporation of protective
features in buildings.
In summary, the identified 19 drivers that encourage the
incorporation of protective features are: The institutional theory analyses ‘the processes and
mechanisms by which structures, schemes, rules and rou-
• Regulations and laws tines become established as authoritative guidelines for
• To satisfy duty of care requirements social behavior’ (Scott, 2005, p 408). It also examines the
• Contractual obligations reasons for the existence of such systems, how they dif-
fuse, and the roles they perform in providing support and
• Government subsidies and funding programmes
purpose to social behaviour (Scott, 2005). Additionally,
• Accreditation for the development the institutional theory also questions how such ‘arrange-
• Support from upper management and stakeholders ments deteriorate and collapse, and how their remnants
• Following industry-standard practice shape successor structures’ (Scott, 2005, p 408).
• Following competitors’ practices Scott (2014) proposed the three pillars of institutional
• Encouraged by a professional body or an association theory to analyse social behaviour. The three pillars - reg-
ulative, normative and cultural-cognitive - identified by
• Enhance property’s reputation
Scott (2014), constitute the underlying pillars of support
• Enhance developer’s reputation and critical components of institutions. Table 1 illustrates
• Greater revenue generation opportunities the various attributes and characteristics of the three
• Increase competitiveness of company pillars as described by Scott (2014).
• Improve development’s marketability Having presented Scott’s (2014) institutional framework,
• Developer sees the importance of security and ac- the barriers and drivers identified earlier for incorporat-
knowledges the need to incorporate protective fea- ing protective features in buildings were mapped onto
tures for this particular project the three institutional pillars to provide an explanatory
framework for the empirical analysis of the study. The
• Aware of the effectiveness of protective features
mapping is shown in Table 2.
Barriers 1. Not required under 1. Insufficient support from 1. High initial and upfront costs
regulations and laws upper management and 2. High operating costs
2. Not required under stakeholders
3. Perceive threat of terrorism as unreal and
contract 2. Low level of improbable
3. Lack of government implementation in the
industry 4. Unavailability of best practices guidelines
funding
5. Uncertainty of the effectiveness of protective
features
6. Lack of awareness of the protective features
available
7. Lack of technical expertise and advice
8. Lack of experience in previous projects
9. Aesthetic implications of protective features
(obtrusive and unfriendly)
Drivers 1. Regulations and laws 1. Accreditation for the 1. Enhance property’s reputation
2. To satisfy duty of care development 2. Enhance developer’s reputation
requirements 2. Support from upper 3. Greater revenue generation opportunities
3. Contractual obligations management and
stakeholders 4. Increase competitiveness of company
4. Government 5. Improve development’s marketability
subsidies and funding 3. Following industry-
programmes standard practice 6. Developer sees the importance of security and
4. Following competitor’s acknowledges the need to incorporate protective
practice features for this particular project
5. Encouraged by a 7. Aware of the effectiveness of protective features
professional body or an 8. Reduce security retrofitting costs
association 9. Developers are conscious of corporate social
responsibility (CSR) and recognize the value of
incorporating protective features in their building
design
10. Seen favourable results achieved by other
building projects
Table 2: Barriers and Drivers categorized in Scott’s (2014) Institutional Framework.
SURVEY FINDINGS - DRIVERS lations and local policies were the driving factors for the
Based on the drivers identified above, respondents were implementation of protective features. Similarly, Hayhoe
asked to rate the level of importance of the drivers which (2015) also observed and agreed that existing building
influenced them to incorporate protective features in codes and regulations have to be reviewed and changed
their respective projects. In order to identify the signifi- to include measures to mitigate terrorist activities, indicat-
cant drivers and test if the institutional theory is applica- ing the considerable importance of regulations and laws in
ble, the one-sample t-test with a 95% confidence level influencing the implementation of protective features.
was conducted. The results are presented in Table 3, Since terrorism is a unique form of risk which has devas-
where the drivers were ranked according to the mean tating consequences and a low perceived probability in
scores within the institutional pillars. Singapore’s context, many building developers and consul-
While the respondents generally felt that all 19 identified tants do not perceive it as a critical issue to be addressed.
drivers were ‘fairly important’ to ‘very important’ Given the proactive stance of the Singapore government
(M = 2.85 to 4.36), the one-sample t-test results showed towards counter-terrorism efforts, this appears to have
that only 14 drivers had a one-tailed significance level of resulted in a complacent culture and mind-set within
less than 0.05, as indicated by the asterisks. This suggests building developers and consultants. Coupled with a
that these 14 driving factors indeed influenced them to profit-driven management which emphasises economic
incorporate protective features in their projects. The top performance, it is difficult for building developers and
two drivers within each of the three institutional pillars consultants to be convinced that there is a need to be
are analysed and discussed below. prepared against terrorism, without economic grounds.
Hence, having mandatory requirements such as laws and
Regulative pillar regulations would inevitably be the most significant driver
Within the regulative pillar, ‘Regulations and laws in pushing for implementation in Singapore’s context.
(M = 4.36)’ was recognised as the most significant driver This was further supported by the interviewees, where
in driving the implementation of protective features in Interviewee A emphasised the significance of having
buildings. This finding was consistent with the study by regulations and policies to drive the implementation of
Harre-Young, Bosher, Dainty & Glass (2012), in that regu- protective features in Singapore’s context:
Note: * p < 0.05 (one-tailed). These indicators were assessed using a Likert scale: 1 = “Least Important” to 5 = “Very Important”.
“The building industry in the private sector is basically we have to comply. No choice. Otherwise, we cannot get
driven by profits. If the profit is going to be reduced, approval and cannot build”.
when you do not need to reduce it because there is
Additionally, the respondents also felt that the presence
no legislation that requires it to be implemented, then
of ‘Contractual obligations (M = 4.10)’ requiring the im-
nobody is going to do it”.
plementation of protective features in buildings, would
Interviewee B also agreed with the importance of also influence them significantly. Contractual obligations
regulations in driving the implementation of protective are duties that each party is legally responsible for in
features in buildings by adding that: a contractual agreement, and the failure to fulfil the
contractual conditions would lead to a breach of con-
“If it is legislated and becomes a requirement, we have
tract which results in claims for damages. The possibility
to advise the owner that they have to comply. That will
of financial and legal penalties hence compel building
become part of the running cost, resulting in high op-
professionals to implement protective features, which
erating cost. If it is a mandatory requirement, then yes,
explains the high perceived importance of this driver.
tioned projects, using a 5-point Likert scale. A one-sam- be compelled to incorporate protective features as these
ple t-test was conducted on the data obtained to identify are perceived to be costly and do not yield any economic
the significant barriers. Table 4 shows their perceptions benefits for them.
towards the barriers which were ranked according to
their mean scores within the institutional pillars. This observation was further validated by Interviewee A
who agreed with the finding and suggested that:
As shown in Table 4, the respondents generally perceived
the barriers to be important as they had higher scores “If the profit is going to be reduced when you do not
than neutral (M = 3.08 to 3.82). Among the list of bar- need to reduce it because there is no legislation that re-
riers, the one-sample t-test results show that only nine quires it (ie protective features) to be implemented, then
barriers had a one-tailed significance level of below 0.05, nobody is going to do it”.
as indicated by the asterisks. This suggests that these Likewise, Interviewee C who represents a real estate
nine barriers indeed significantly hindered the respon- developer, agreed that there was a lack of regulations
dents to incorporate protective features in their projects. governing the implementation of protective features
The top two barriers within each institutional pillar are in buildings. He commented that even for the imple-
discussed below. mentation of basic protective features such as CCTVs in
the shopping malls that he manages, the decision was
Regulative pillar
primarily fuelled by the need to protect the interests of
‘Not required under regulations and laws (M = 3.56)’ the organisation and the safety of the visitors rather than
appears to be the most significant barrier to the imple- for security reasons. In addition, Interviewee C suggested
mentation of protective features within the regulative that more can be done by making it mandatory for all
pillar. This barrier is in agreement with the findings of new buildings to engage a security consultant to assess
Harre-Young, Bosher, Dainty & Glass (2012) that the lack the terrorism risk and thereafter, propose suitable and
of regulations in place is one of the key barriers to the appropriate protective measures to enhance the imple-
implementation of protective features. Coaffee & O’Hare mentation of these features in new building projects.
(2008) also recognised that in the absence of regula-
tions, most building developers and professionals would In addition, the respondents also perceived ‘Not required
ignore the pressure to implement protective features. under contract (M = 3.54)’ as the second most important
Without regulations in place, building owners may not barrier to implementing protective features in buildings.
Similar to the lack of mandatory regulations, the lack “It all boils down to money. Because whether you are
of contractual obligations is not an unexpected finding building apartments, office building or a shopping centre,
because building professionals are not compelled to developers are building it as a business”.
incorporate protective features if the contract forms and
Similarly, when asked if high upfront and operating costs
design specifications did not require them to do so.
were the most significant barrier to incorporating protec-
Normative pillar tive features in buildings, Interviewee B agreed and said
that:
‘Insufficient support from upper management and
stakeholders (M = 3.49)’ seems to be the most significant “Yes. Anything you see in Singapore, it is all about cost.
barrier within the normative pillar. This seems to suggest Anything you want is costly because everything is im-
that senior management and stakeholders in Singapore’s ported. … If cost does not permit, we cannot do any-
built environment are less supportive of the decision to thing. If cost permits, we also want to make sure that our
implement protective features in buildings. The inter- building is safe”.
views suggest that the implementation of protective
features in buildings follows a top-down approach and It is therefore evident that the high initial and oper-
requires extensive commitment from upper manage- ating costs were perceived to be the most significant
ment. Hence, the lack of such leadership would hinder barriers to the implementation of protective features
the successful implementation of protective features, in buildings. While the implementation of protective
which explains the high importance of this barrier. features would inevitably increase the overall con-
struction cost, its potential benefits may outweigh its
The other noteworthy barrier within the normative cost, depending on the risk and likelihood of a terror-
pillar was ‘Low level of implementation in the industry’. ist attack. Stewart (2008) conducted a risk-cost-benefit
Among the list of 14 barriers identified, this barrier had analysis and concluded that expenditure on protective
the lowest mean score of 3.08, indicating that most features was indeed cost-effective for commercial
respondents felt that it was the least important barrier. buildings, that had greater damage consequences or
Furthermore, this barrier had a p-value of 0.661 which were facing a specific threat, to implement protective
was greater than 0.05. This suggests that there is insuffi- features. These barriers can thus be seen as a biased
cient evidence to conclude that the low level of imple- perception due to the difficulty in highlighting the
mentation of protective features in the industry was a probability of a terrorist attack occurring on their proj-
significant barrier. ects and demonstrating the benefits in implementing
protective features.
Cultural-cognitive pillar
The results show that the top two barriers within the cul-
tural-cognitive pillar were ‘High initial and upfront costs
CONCLUSION
(M = 3.82)’ and ‘High operating costs (M = 3.82)’. This This study adopts the institutional framework of Scott
suggests that building owners and design consultants in (2014) to map the identified barriers and drivers to the
the Singapore construction industry perceive cost as an three institutional pillars to explain the organisational
integral factor in hindering their adoption of protective behaviour towards the implementation of protective
features. This is not surprising as building developers are features in buildings. The key findings are as follows:
profit-driven organisations who aim to maximise their • The drivers within the regulative pillar influence build-
profits. The literature revealed that the main reason for ing professionals to incorporate protective features in
the poor implementation rates of protective features buildings. All the drivers within the regulative pillar were
among developers was the increased construction costs significant.
(Emmitt, 2012; Ettouney et al, 1996; Harre-Young, Bosh-
er, Dainty & Glass, 2009; Little, 2007; Norville & Con- • The drivers within the normative pillar influence building
rath, 2006). For example, using blast-proof materials to professionals to incorporate protective features in build-
construct a building could increase the overall construc- ings. Three out of five drivers within the normative pillar
tion costs by approximately 15% to 20% as compared to were significant.
conventional buildings (Lin & Cheong, 2016). Due to the • The drivers within the cultural-cognitive pillar influence
high costs incurred for constructing a protective building, building professionals to incorporate protective features
it is comprehensible that high initial and operating costs in buildings. Seven out of 10 drivers within the cultur-
were perceived as the top two barriers. Consequently,
al-cognitive pillar were significant.
there seems to be a common belief among the respon-
dents in the cultural-cognitive pillar that the cost of • The barriers within the regulative pillar hinder building
incorporating protective features in buildings is substan- professionals from incorporating protective features in
tially high. buildings. Two out of three barriers within the regulative
pillar were significant.
Furthermore, from the in-depth interviews conducted,
all three interviewees validated and agreed with the sur- • The barriers within the normative pillar hinder building
vey findings that cost is a strong barrier to the implemen- professionals from incorporating protective features in
tation of protective features. When asked if cost was the buildings. One out of two barriers within the normative
primary factor, Interviewee A said that: pillar was significant.
• The barriers within the cultural-cognitive pillar hinder ences to inform them of the security threats faced by
building professionals from incorporating protective the built environment sector, in order to raise their
features in buildings. Six out of nine barriers within the awareness with regard to building security issues. Best
cultural-cognitive pillar were significant. practices and the different protective features available
for implementation in buildings can also be introduced
The one-sample t-test established that nine out of 14 to industry professionals. This can help to improve the
barriers were significant. The top two significant barriers implementation of protective features in buildings, fol-
from each institutional pillar are: lowing the identification that personal belief arising from
(1) Not required under regulations and laws the cultural-cognitive pillar is one of the key motivational
(2) Not required under contract factors. Likewise, this initiative can increase management
support and commitment, following its earlier identifica-
(3) Insufficient support from upper management and tion as a significant driver within the normative pillar.
stakeholders
(4) Low level of implementation in the industry Embracing smart security technologies
A key barrier identified in this study relates to the high
(5) High initial and upfront costs
upfront and initial costs of incorporating protective
(6) High operating costs features. The high upfront costs often arise from the
Among these barriers, the two highest rated barriers implementation of passive security features such as
were high initial costs and high operating costs, which bollards, blast-protected curtain walls and structural
both appeared to have the same mean scores. The inter- strengthening. Hence, in order to reduce the reliance
viewees also highlighted that cost was a major impeding on passive security features to reduce the capital costs
factor to the implementation of protective features. incurred, industry professionals can consider embracing
active security features such as smart security technol-
The one-sample t-test indicate that 14 out of 19 drivers ogies. These include artificial intelligence and analytic
were significant. The top two drivers from each institu- CCTVs with facial recognition functions that can monitor
tional pillar are: video feeds and identify high-risk situations.
(1) Regulations and laws
(2) Contractual obligations REFERENCES
Chin B W A, Gao S & Low S P (2015): ‘An Institutional Approach
(3) Support from upper management and stakeholders to Understanding Post-Project Reviews in the Construction
(4) Following industry-standard practice Industry’, International Surveying Research Journal, 5(1), 1-19.
(5) Aware of the effectiveness of protective features City of London Crime Prevention Association (2014). Building
Security Accreditation, Retrieved August 29, 2017, from http://
(6) Developer sees the importance of security and www.cityoflondoncpa.org.uk/bsa/
acknowledges the need to incorporate protective Coaffee J & O’Hare P (2008): ‘Urban resilience and national
features for this particular project. security: the role for planning’, Proceedings of the Institution of
Among these drivers, the two highest-rated drivers in Civil Engineers - Urban Design and Planning (pp 173-182), ICE
influencing the implementation of protective features Publishing.
are mandatory regulations and the support from higher Emmitt S (2012): Architectural Technology (2nd ed), West Sus-
management. This was also highlighted extensively by sex, UK, John Wiley & Sons Inc.
the interviewees. Ettouney M, Smilowitz R & Rittenhouse T (1996): ‘Blast Resis-
tant Design of Commercial Buildings’, Practice Periodical on
The following recommendations are made at the conclu-
Structural Design and Construction, 1(1), 31-39.
sion of this study:
Fussey P (2011): ‘Deterring terrorism? Target-hardening,
Mandatory risk assessment for terrorism threats surveillance and the prevention of terrorism’, A Sike (Ed), The
While the government has recently introduced the Infra- Psychology of Counter-Terrorism (pp 164-185), Abingdon, UK,
structure Protection Act to mandate selected buildings to Routledge.
implement protective features to enhance building security, Harre-Young S, Bosher L, Dainty A & Glass J (2009): ‘The impli-
the government can also consider mandating building de- cations of the UK’s counterterrorism strategy on the construc-
velopers to engage security professionals and consultants to tion sector’, A Dainty (Ed), 25th Annual ARCOM Conference
assess the terrorism risk of every building prior to its design (pp 1285-94), Nottingham, UK, Association of Researchers in
development. This ensures that the developer is aware of Construction Management.
the security risks involved and provides him with a better Harre-Young S, Bosher L, Dainty A & Glass J (2012): ‘Incorporat-
understanding of the appropriate mitigation measures that ing security measures into the built environment, S Smith (Ed),
can be introduced proportionately. 28th Annual ARCOM Conference (pp 1187-1196), Edinburgh,
UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management.
Engaging the industry Hayhoe J (2015): ‘Designing Super-Tall Buildings for Increased Re-
Apart from a regulatory framework, local agencies such silience: New Measures and Cost Considerations’, H Robinson, B
as Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) and Singapore Police Symonds, B Gilbertson & B Ilozor (Eds), Design Economics for the
Force (SPF) can also consider engaging the developers Built Environment: Impact of Sustainability on Project Evaluation
and building designers through seminars and confer- (pp 284-298), West Sussex, UK, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Jon C & Bosher L S (2008): ‘Integrating counter-terrorist resil- Rouse J (2004): ‘Measuring value or only cost: The need for
ience into sustainability’, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil new valuation methods’, S Macmillian (Ed), Designing Better
Engineers Urban Design and Planning, 161(DP2), 75-83. Buildings: Quality and Value in the Built Environment (pp 55-
Kitchen T & Schneider R H (2007): Crime Prevention and the 71), London, UK, Spon Press.
Built Environment New York, N Y, USA, Routledge. Scott W R (2005): ‘Institutional Theory’, Encyclopedia of Social
Lin Y & Cheong D (2016): ‘Boosting anti-terror features of build- Theory (pp 409-414), Sage Publications Inc.
ings: Singapore government reviews security guidelines’, 4 April Scott W R (2014): Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Inter-
2016, The Straits Times. ests and Identities (4th ed), Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, Sage
Little R G (2007): ‘Cost-effective strategies to address urban Publications Inc.
terrorism: A risk management approach’, H W Richardson, P Shanmugam K (2016): ‘Enhancing Singapore’s responses to
Gordon & J E Moore II (Eds), The Economic Costs and Conse- terrorism’, Keynote Address, The Home Team Leaders’ Forum,
quences of Terrorism (pp 98-115), Cheltenham, UK, Edward 19 March 2016, Singapore: Ministry of Home Affairs.
Elgar Publishing Limited. Stewart M G (2008): ‘Cost-effectiveness of risk mitigation strat-
Low S P, Gao S, Che-Ani A I. & Siah C (2014): ‘Institutional egies for protection of buildings against terrorist attack’, Journal
Framework for Understanding Ethics in Construction Firms’, of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 22(2), 115-120.
International Surveying Research Journal, 4(1), 1-20. White S & Cochrane D (2017): ‘Improving security through the
Low S P, Liu J & Sio S (2010): ‘Business continuity management in design process’, Construction Manager Magazine, Retrieved
large construction companies in Singapore’, Disaster Prevention August 19, 2017, from http://www.constructionmanagermaga-
and Management: An International Journal, 19(2), 219-232. zine.com/management/building-security-design-process/
Norville H S & Conrath E J (2006): ‘Blast-Resistant Glazing De- Yusof Z M (2017): ‘Industry welcomes new law to protect build-
sign’, Journal of Architectural Engineering, 12(3), 129-136. ings against attacks’, 5 October 2017, The Straits Times.
IES 53rd
Annual Dinner
On 10 October 2019, IES hosted its 53rd Annual Din-
ner, themed ‘Engineering a Sustainable Singapore’, at
Shangri-La Hotel, Singapore. Deputy Prime Minister and
Minister for Finance Heng Swee Keat graced the occasion
as the guest-of-honour.
The dinner kicked off with members of the Young Engi-
neers and WiSER Committees pulling off some wicked
dance moves on stage with an energetic three-minute
performance.
“Who said engineers were boring?” remarked IES
President Prof Yeoh Lean Weng in his welcome address,
applauding their show and appreciating them for putting The IES-YEC and WiSER Committees put up a high-tempo dance
it together within a short period of time. performance during the dinner.
Noting that engineers could also be versatile, he pointed
out that the emcee for the evening was an engineer with
Er. Tan Ee Ping received the prestigious 2019 IES Lifetime
SMRT, and spoke of their value in other fields. He then pro-
Engineering Achievement Award for his accomplishments
ceeded to give a preview of the evening’s activities through
that have made profound impact on the engineering
a humorous speech that was well-received by the guests.
industry and community, and brought honours to Singa-
The first of the many awards that were given out during pore on the world stage. Over his 55-year career, he has
the dinner was the IES Distinguished Honorary Patron ti- contributed extensively to Singapore’s built environment
tle. This was conferred upon DPM Heng, in recognition of and economic growth.
his central role in shaping the advancement of engineer-
IES also presented the inaugural IES Outstanding Part-
ing in Singapore.
ner Award that recognises and honours outstanding
This year, Mr Ng Chee Meng, Minister in the Prime Minis- organisations which have contributed significantly to
ter’s Office and Secretary-General of NTUC was conferred IES and the engineering community. This went to the
the title of IES Honorary Fellow. This was to recognise Defence Science and Technology Agency (DSTA), for its
his outstanding contributions in shaping engineering longstanding commitment in partnering IES to promote
education and developing engineering leaders to support engineering excellence and its impact on the practice of
Singapore’s future growth. engineering here.
During the dinner, IES also launched its Incubator and Accelerator (IES-INCA; above) and the Singapore Rail Standards Initiative. These will
assist engineers in their technopreneurship journey and further railway standards respectively.
Engineering
Discovery
Camp 2019
This year, the Engineering Dis-
covery Camp was a collaboration
among Science Centre Singapore
and three student chapters from
NTU, NUS and SUTD.
Held on 1, 17 and 22 June 2019,
the workshops held during the
camps exposed lower second-
ary school students to various
engineering disciplines through
hands-on activities.
NTU, NUS and SUTD introduced
civil engineering, chemical and
mechanical engineering, and
computer engineering plus pro-
gramming respectively. A total of Participants of the Engineering Discovery Camp session conducted by IES-NTU showing off their
57 students participated in the projects
camp.
The first session on 1 June began with a Seismic
Design workshop for the participants. The students
understood more about earthquakes from Kok Khuen,
the president of the NTU student chapter.
He demonstrated the importance of piling through a
simple experiment with tofu and toothpicks. After-
wards, each group of participants were given a certain
number of tokens to exchange for materials to con-
struct a seismic model, which was then subjected to a
four-level intensity seismic generator for load testing.
At the next workshop, the activity that the IES-NUS
student chapter came up with was to create a system
Intense discussion going on during the IES-NUS student chapter
to model a dilution process for paintball production. workshop.
It was well-received, with participants actively en-
gaged in making use of the given resources to produce
their own unique systems. They then showed off the
“fruits” of their labour by firing them at targets.
Last but not least, IES-SUTD conducted a workshop
using the Micro:bit processor. The student partici-
pants picked up computational thinking and basic
coding syntax using the micro:bit. At the end of the
workshop, they learnt how to put together motors,
wheels, and vehicle bodies together to create their
own working micro:bit-controlled car.
It was a fruitful experience for both the participants as Mr Mervyn Sirisena, Vice-President of IES, shared some of his
well as the IES Student Chapters. wisdom with the participants of the IES-SUTD chapter workshop.
THE ENGINEERING
MINDS
On 28 September 2019, the IES-Young Engineers Noting that there was no ‘fixed’ method to the analysis,
Committee (YEC) invited IES President Professor Yeoh Prof Yeoh mentioned that modular systems thinking
Lean Weng to share more about “The Engineering would vary with context. By recognising the links
Minds”. This is one of the Professional Development between modules and how they work, do not work, or
Talks that IES-YEC organises for the community, with could potentially work, one can draw useful outcomes.
more in the pipeline. With an analytical engineering mind that possesses
The talk attracted over 40 engineers, both young and system-based problem solving skills, an engineer would
experienced, from various engineering disciplines, as not only excel in engineering, but also in other fields.
well as engineering students from various IES Student For example, when it comes to business transformation,
Chapters in polytechnics and universities. there are many decisions to be made and being able to
see the strategic picture and assess the various factors
Prof Yeoh was invited to share more about systems would help one formulate more effective action plans.
engineering and his experiences in the industry. As
director of urban solutions and sustainability at the The talk ended with an engaging Q&A session. The
National Research Foundation, he is responsible candid exchange of opinions between all participants,
for strengthening Singapore’s R&D capabilities and whose perspectives were shaped by their education
fostering innovation to meet the nation’s long-term and experiences, made it a valuable learning journey
energy, water and environmental challenges. for all.
ADVERTISERS’ INDEX
Building and Construction Authority ––––––––––– Page 01 IES Membership –––––––––––––––––– Inside Back Cover
Cementaid (S.E.A.) Pte Ltd –––––––––––––––––––– Page 05 IES Railway Systems Handbook ––––––––––––––– Page 13
IES Chartered Engineer –––––––––––– Inside Front Cover MultiNine Corporation Pte Ltd ––––––– Outside Back Cover