UNIVERSITY OF THE CORDILLERAS

COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE

Department of Architecture

MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ARCHITECTURE (MSAR)

2018 Curriculum

OUTCOMES-BASED SYLLABUS
I. Course Code – Name PS1 - Research Methodology and Statistics for MS Architecture Classification Code PC-MS1
Term and Year Offered 1st Year 1st Trimester Course Classification PROFESSIONAL COURSE
II. Course Description Quantitative and operational methods in architectural design research activity, requirement in use analysis.
Contact Hours: 70 hours Credit Units: 3 Unit Lecture
4 hours per meeting
13 weeks
Prerequisite(s): None Co-requisites: None

III. Institutional Vision: UC envisions itself as a community of scholars aggressively involved in the pursuit of knowledge who help preserve Filipino culture and values to act positively by training them
Mission, Vision to think critically and creatively.
Statement (VM)
Mission Statement: To provide functional knowledge and skills, dynamic interaction, and leadership in various disciplines for a better quality of life.
To these ends, UC shall:
1. Develop teaching-learning environment that is conducive to inquiry and independent thought;
2. Regularly update its curricular offerings to keep abreast of the ever-changing academic environment;
3. Intensify the university’s research and community involvement programs;
4. Contribute to the appreciation of the historical and cultural heritage of the Filipinos;
5. Be actively involved in the molding of a national identity, the formation of the national purpose, and the attainment of unity among Filipinos;
6. Cultivate a deep sense of moral and spiritual values;
7. Expand its scholarship program by making it available to a wide segment of the community; and
8. Empower its constituents for responsible and functional leadership.

UC Graduate Attributes:
o Professional Competence, ○ Collaborative ○ Lifelong learning capabilities
o Critical thinking and Problem Solving ○ Communication Skills

College Mission: The College of Engineering & Architecture (CEA) commits to train and produce graduates who will be A.R.M.D.:
Able to pass the licensure examinations and/or government/industry certifications;
Ready for professional practice;
Steadfast in upholding Moral uprightness;
Confident and aggressive in the pursuit of professional and personal Development.

IV. Program Within 3 to 5 years after graduation, graduates of architecture are expected to: Mission Vision
 Educational PEO 1 Practice and grow as architects, conducting research and designing, developing and maintaining projects in various technical areas of
 
Objectives (PEO) architecture.
PEO 2 Visualized and pursue life-long learning in various technical areas of architecture.  
PEO 3 Decide to be active members in the work place and in professional organizations by demonstrating effective communication skills,
ethical responsibility and social and environmental awareness.  

V. Student By the time of graduation, the students of the program shall be able to: PEO 1 PEO 2 PEO3
Outcomes (SO) SO 1 Assess and create developments in the field of architecture through their receptiveness to news ideas and knowledge through scientific
  
research.
SO 2 Develop and adapt the ability to communicate in visual, oral and written form.  
SO 3 Recognize the ability to work effectively and independently in multi-disciplinary and multi-cultural teams for the built environment in
 
the context of ecological balance and sustainable development, restoration, and conservation of cultural and historical heritage.
SO 4 Prioritize the application and recognition of ethical, social, and environmental responsibility in the profession. 
SO 5 Create architectural solution s by applying knowledge in history, theory, planning, building technology and utilities, structural concepts
 
and professional practice.
SO 6 Apply concepts and principles from specialized fields and allied disciplines into various architectural problems. 
SO 7 Develop the preparation of contract documents, technical, reports and other legal documents used in architectural practice adhering to

applicable laws, standards and regulations.
SO 8 Interpret and apply the relevant laws, codes, charters and standards of architecture and the built environment.  
SO 9 Apply research methods to address architectural problems.   
SO 10 Apply various Information and Communication Technology (ICT) media for architectural solutions, presentation, and techniques in
design and construction.
SO 11 Develop entrepreneurial and business acumen relevant to the architecture practice.
SO 12 Show and demonstrate their involvement and competencies in the management of construction works and building administration.

VI. Course Program Education

Student Outcomes
Learning At the end of the course, the students shall be able to: Objectives
Outcomes (CLO)

PEO 1

PEO 2

PEO 3
SO 10

SO 11

SO 12
SO 1

SO 2

SO 3

SO 4

SO 5

SO 6

SO 7

SO 8

SO 9
CLO 1 1. Explain the Basis of Research: Philosophical Outlook. I I I I I
CLO 2 2. Acquire basic research methods and procedures. I I I I
CLO 3 3. Acquire the knowledge of critical thinking in connection with
I I I I
research leading to a good thesis proposal.
CLO 4 4. Develop and produce preliminary research thesis
requirements:
a. Produce feasible thesis title proposal.
I 1 I 1 1 I
b. Formulate research objectives.
c. Apply workable research methods and
procedures
UC-VPAA-CEA-SYL-___ Page 2 of 5
JANUARY 2019 Rev. 00
 I – Introductory P – Practiced D – Demonstrate

VII. Course Content

Week Day Topics Teaching Learning Activities Assessment Strategies

M I D T E R M S
1 1 CLASS ORIENTATION AND LEVELING OF EXPECTATIONS Orientation Assignment/Research
Course Syllabus, Course Expectations, and Learning Contract Work
1 2 1. Introduction to Research Method Lecture Assignment/Research
2. Research standing in the Philippines Work
2 1 3. Values of research to man Experiential Learning Quiz
3 2 4. Characteristics of research Lecture

4 1 5. Kinds and classifications of research Lecture

5 1 6. The scientific method of research Lecture Quiz

6 1 7. Critical Thinking Lecture

2 Lecture
MIDTERM EXAM
Topic Learning Outcomes (TLO)
1. Comprehend and internalize the architectural importance of the nature and functions of research expanded role of an architect in the built Environment. CLO1, CLO2, CLO3.
2. Acquire in depth knowledge of importance of data collection methods, data processing and tabulation and data analysis and interpretation. CLO1, CLO2, CLO3.
3. Acquire the knowledge of critical thinking in connection with research leading to a good thesis proposal. CLO1, CLO2, CLO3.
F I N A L S
7 1 8. The research problem/Research Design Lecture Assignment/Research
Work
2 9. Methods of research, strategies of investigation, and Types of Descriptive method Experiential Learning
8 3 10. Types of sampling Lecture Quiz
4 11. Preliminaries Lecture
9 1 12. Components of thesis chapters 1, 2, 3, and 4. Lecture
2 The Research Problem Lecture
10 1 Review of Related Literature and Studies Lecture Assignment/Research
Work
2 Research Methodology Lecture
11 1 Results and Discussions Lecture
12 1 Conclusions and Recommendations Lecture
13 2 Students Presentation/Lecture
FINAL EXAM
Topic Learning Outcomes (TLO)
1. Comprehend and internalize the holistic components of a thesis. (CLO 1, CLO 2, CLO 3).
UC-VPAA-CEA-SYL-___ Page 3 of 5
JANUARY 2019 Rev. 00
 2. Evaluate some samples of thesis proposal. (CLO 1, CLO 2, CLO 3).
3. Produce a sample of thesis proposal. (CLO1, CLO2, CLO3).

VIII. CO Assessment Tasks (AT)

CLOs Assessment Tools Standard

CLO 1 Class Standing (Research Works, Quiz, Exam). At least 50% of the students will get a score of at least 60%.
CLO 2 Class Standing (Research Works, Quiz, Exam). At least 50% of the students will get a score of at least 60%.
CLO 3 Class Standing (Research Works, Quiz, Exam). At least 50% of the students will get a score of at least 60%.
CLO 4 Class Standing (Research Works, Quiz, Exam). At least 50% of the students will get a score of at least 60%.

IX. Computation of Scores

Passing Score: 60%

Raw Midterm Score (RMS): 50% (Class Standing) + 50% (Midterm Exam Score)
Raw Final Score (RFS): 50% (Class Standing) + 50% (Final Exam Score)

Final Score (FS): 50% (MS) + 50% (RFS)

Note: Scores are transmuted to an equivalent grade where a score of at least 60% would be the minimum passing grade of 75.

X. References

Textbook Calderon, Jose F. and Expectacion C. Gonzales (1993). Methods of Research and Thesis Writing.
References 1. Adanza, E. G., Bermudo, P. (2010). Methods of research: a primer. Manila: Rex Book Store.
2. Paler-Calmorin, L. and Calmorin, M. A. (2007). Research methods and thesis writing. (2nd ed.). Manila: Rex Book Store.
3. Garcia, c. D. and Reganit, A. A. R. (2010). Developing competencies in research and thesis writing. Mandaluyong City: Books Atbp.
4. Magsajo-Sarno, E. (2011). Tips and Techniques in writing research. Manila: Rex Book Store.
5. Coghlan, D., & Brannick, T. (2010). Doing action research in your own organization. (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, Calif.; London: SAGE.
6. Belen, J. A. R. (2010). Thesis writing primer. Quezon City: Rex Book Store.
7. Adanza, E. G., Bermudo, P. J. V. and Rasonabe, M. B. (2009). Methods of research: a primer. Manila: Rex Book Store.
8. Thomas, R. M., Brubaker, D. L. (2008). Theses and dissertations: a guide to planning, research. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Corwin Press.
Websites • http://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/researchdesigns04/25/2017
• http://www.ehow.com/how_8245008_write-title-research-paper.html#ixzz2k8W7v2W1
• http://www.ehow.com/how_8245008_write-title-research-paper.html#ixzz2k8XG21MJ

XI. Other Course Policy

Attendance The maximum allowable number of absences of a student per trimester is 20% of the total number of class hours. A student who incurs more than the allowable percentage of class hours,
whether excused or unexcused, will be considered unofficially dropped and shall be given a failing grade. However, other considerations shall be considered as reflected in the CEA
Student handbook regarding Classroom Policies.
Assignment Assignments and other coursework are due at the beginning of the class period of the specified date. Late assignments are worth 0% credit after due date.
UC-VPAA-CEA-SYL-___ Page 4 of 5
JANUARY 2019 Rev. 00
 Language of Instruction Lectures, discussion, and documentation will be in English. Written and spoken work may receive a lower mark if it is, in the opinion of the instructor, deficient in English.

Consultation Schedules Consultation schedules with the instructors are posted in the CEA bulletin board. It is recommended that the student first set an appointment to confirm the instructor’s availability. All
consultation activities should be reflected in the student-Teacher Consultation Form.
Final Product/ As its finale for the subject, the students based from what had been discussed and learned in this subject, they need to have application that would lead in the creation of a pre-thesis
Performance/ Capstone proposal to be submitted and orally presented before the first day of final examination.
Project

XII. Assessment, Evaluation, and Continuous Quality Improvement

Assessment The assessment is based on the performance of the students in various teaching learning activities through the indicated assessment techniques. Scores obtained by the students are
encoded using the university’s automated class record to determine the extent of achieving the course learning outcomes. The instructor prepares and submits the intervention form to the
college if the class targets and standard is not attained.

Evaluation Each engineering program has three (3) OBE coordinators to facilitate the monitoring of students’ achievement to CLOs, SOs and PEOs and ensure that OBE implementation is in place.
They are responsible in recommending appropriate interventions to further improve the delivery of the course as well as achieving the desired outcomes.

CQI Regularly updates course syllabi based on CHED requirements and industry advisory board recommendations.

XII. Committee Member/s

Chair: Ar. Nicanor K. Latogan

Members: Ar. Irene G. Florendo Ar. Virgilio E. Villanda

Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by References Verified Noted by

Ar. Nicanor K. Latogan Ar. Nicanor K. Latogan Engr. Nelson G. Notarte Ms. Beverly B. Chapichap Dr. Ariel Nimo B. Pumecha
Instructor Dept.-Head, Architecture OIC, CEA Chief Librarian OIC, VPAA and Research

UC-VPAA-CEA-SYL-___ Page 5 of 5
JANUARY 2019 Rev. 00