Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Step 9 - reaction
Oxygen Path
From A Bubble To An Immobilized Cell System
5
Step 1
Diffusion through the bubble to the gas-liquid interface
▪ Gas molecules move quickly
▪ They are evenly distributed throughout the bubble.
O2
6
⚫ Step 2 - Diffusion across the gas-liquid interface
This step will be very rapid if the concentration of oxygen in
the bubble is high. High oxygen concentrations in the bubble (as
measured in terms of partial pressure) will push the oxygen
molecules across the interface, into the boundary layer.
If the medium is rich in CO2 , then the carbon dioxide will be
pushed into the bubble.
If the bubble contains a low concentration of oxygen,
then the rate of oxygen transfer
out of the bubble will be slow
or even zero
O2
7
CO2
Step 3- Diffusion through stagnant liquid film
The movement of solutes through the film is slow. Solutes
move through the liquid by diffusion.
The movement of the molecule will be driven by the
concentration gradient across the boundary layer.
8
Step 4 Movement through the bulk liquid by forced
convection and diffusion
The rate of movement of an oxygen molecule through the
bulk liquid is dependent on
⚫ the degree of mixing (relative to the volume of the reactor)
⚫ viscosity of the medium
O2
9
⚫ Step 5-9: Movement through the floc
complete the journey of the oxygen molecule
Step 5 - movement through the boundary layer
surrounding the microbial slime.
Step 6 - entry into the slime
Step 7 - movement through the slime
Step 8 - movement across the cell membrane
Step 9 - reaction
⚫ Steps 5 and 7 are slow processes.
10
Step 3
The interface oxygen transfer equation
N A = kL a (C * −CL ) = OTR
NA = Volume-dependent mass transfer (mM O2 / h)
kL = Transfer coefficient at the phase boundary
a = Specific exchange surface
kLa = Volumetric oxygen transfer coefficient (h-1)
C* = Saturation value of the dissolved gas in the phase boundary
CL = Concentration of the dissolved gas (mM)
OTR = O2 Transfer Rate (mM O2/h) 11
Molecular Diffusion
The movement of component molecules in a mixture
under the influence of a concentration difference in
the system. Diffusion of molecules occurs in the
direction required to destroy the concentration
gradient.
12
Fick’s Law of diffusion
13
Mass-Transfer Coefficient (kL & kG)
where
• dCL / dt is the oxygen transfer rate, mM / h
• dCL is the dissolved concentration of the solute in
the bulk liquid or fermentation broth
• k is the mass transfer coefficient for the solute
through the boundary layer
• A is the total interfacial area and
• C* is the concentration of the solute in the boundary
layer.
14
Mass-Transfer Coefficient (kL & kG)
where
• NG mass flux from the gas phase to the interface
• NL liquid-side mass flux, kg / h. m2
• qG rate of mass transfer in liquid phase, kg / h
• kG is the individual mass-transfer coefficient for the
gas phase, m/s
• A is the interfacial area , m2
• CGi is the gas-side concentration in the interface
• Cli is the liquid-side conc in the interface, kg / m3
15
Concentration profile near a gas-liquid interface
16
Mass-Transfer Coefficient (kL & kG)
⚫ Since the amount of solute transferred from the gas
phase to the interface must equal that from the
interface to the liquid phase,
NG =NL (1)
⚫ Substitution of NG and NL into Eq. (1) gives
17
Mass-Transfer Coefficient (kL & kG)
⚫ It is hard to determine the mass-transfer coefficient
because the interfacial concentrations, CLi or CGi
cannot be measured
⚫ To define the overall mass-transfer coefficient as
follows :
where
⚫ CG* is the gas-side concentration which would be in equilibrium with the
L-phase conc
19
⚫ The equilibrium curve explaining the meaning of CG* and CL*
Mass-Transfer Coefficient (kL & kG)
⚫ Example 9.2 Derive the relationship between the overall mass-transfer
coefficient for liquid phase KL and the individual mass-transfer
coefficients, kL and kG. How can this relationship be simplified for
sparingly soluble gases?
For sparingly soluble gases, the slope of the
equilibrium curve is very steep; therefore, M
is much greater than 1:
KL≈kL
Since
22
23
According to the film theory, turbulence in each fluid
dies out at the phase boundary. A thin film of relatively
stagnant fluid exists on either side of the interface;
mass transfer through this film is effected solely by
molecular diffusion. The concentration of A changes
near the interface.
Most of the resistance to mass transfer resides in the
liquid films rather than in the bulk liquid.
It is generally assumed that there is negligible resistance
to transport at the interface itself; this is equivalent to
assuming that the phases are in equilibrium at the plane
of Mass Transfer contact.
24
The difference between CA1i and CA2i at the interface
accounts for the possibility that, at equilibrium, A may be
more soluble in one phase than in the other.
For example, if A were acetic acid in contact at the
interface with both water and chloroform, the
equilibrium concentration in water would be greater than
that in chloroform by a factor of between 5 and 10.
25
26
Correlation for Mass-Transfer
Coefficient
⚫ Mass-transfer coefficient is a function of physical
properties and vessel geometry
⚫ Because of the complexity of hydrodynamics in
multiphase mixing, it is difficult, if not impossible, to
derive a useful correlation based on a purely
theoretical basis
⚫ It is common to obtain an empirical correlation for
the mass-transfer coefficient by fitting experimental
data. The correlations are usually expressed by
dimensionless groups since they are dimensionally
consistent and also useful for scale-up processes. 27
Determination of Oxygen-Absorption Rate
The oxygen absorption rate per unit volume qa/v can be
estimated by
must
maximize
28
29
Methods of KLa determination
31
Limitations of sulfite oxidation method
32
Example 9.6
To measure kLa, a fermenter was filled with 10 L of 0.5 M sodium sulfite solution
containing 0.003 M Cu2+ ion and the air sparger was turned on. After exactly 10 minutes,
the air flow was stopped and a 10 mL sample was taken and titrated. The concentration
of the sodium sulfite in the sample was found to be 0.21 mol/L. The experiment was
carried out at 25°C and 1 atm. Calculate the oxygen uptake and kLa.
Solution: The amount of sodium sulfite reacted for 10 minutes is 0.5 - 0.21 = 0.29
mol/L.
Acc to stoich, the amount of oxygen required to react is 0.29 mol/L Na2SO3 x ½ mol O2
/ mol Na2SO3 = 0.145mol/L.
*Therefore, oxygen uptake qa/v is
From Henry’s law, solubility of oxygen in equilibrium with air can be estimated by:
33
H. The value of Henry's law constant at T can be obtained from the solubilities listed
in Table 9.2
Po
C* =
H
For example, at 25°C, CL* is 1.26 mmol/L and pO2 is 1 atm because it
is pure oxygen. By substituting these values into Eq.
we obtain HO2 (25°C) is 0.793 atm L/mmol.
34
Dynamic Gassing-out Technique (2)
from which kLa can be calculated based on the measured values of CL(t1)
and CL(t2)
Direct Measurement (3)
In this technique, we directly measure the oxygen content of
the gas stream entering and leaving the fermenter by using
gaseous oxygen analyzer. The oxygen uptake can be calculated
as
40
n)
41
42
43
44
The different flow patterns produced by a disc
turbine that occur under a range of aeration and
agitation conditions (Fig. 9.13).
Fig 9.13A shows the flow profile of a non- aerated vessel and Fig9.13B to F
the profiles with increasing airflow rate. As air-flow rate increases the flow
profile changes from one dominated by agitation (Fig. 9.13 B)to one
dominated by air flow (Fig9.13 D to F) until finally the air flow rate is such that 45
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
1. MEDIUM RHEOLOGY
However, during oxygen limitation, when arithmetic growth occurs, the oxygen uptake
rate remains constant in a unicellular system whereas it decreases in a mycelial one.
The only possible explanation for such a decrease is the increasing viscosity of the
69
culture caused by the increasing mycelial concentration.
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
▪ The upper graph represents the relationship
between the dissolved oxygen concentration and
the volumetric oxygen transfer rate achievable in
three fermenters (plots 1, 2 and 3 represent
fermenters of increasing KLa values) while
82
83
84
Reference
85