Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2. How does this Chapter differ from the first chapter of Noli when it comes to plot?
The plot in my opinion was stated in a same manner. Started with the day, the place,
the people in the place, then escalated by an argument of which reveals the attitude of
the colonialists, then ends the chapter with just the argument being unsolved. The only
difference is the addition of the highlight of Doña Victorina’s irritation to the captain of
the ship and the explanation of what had happened to her.
3. What can we infer from the different descriptions among the Spanish friars such
as Camorra, Salvi, Sibyla et al., about their position in the colonial hierarchy? How
do they view locals or Indios? What can we say about Rizal’s own views on the friars?
I think these friars thought about themselves so highly in the colonial hierarchy.
Whether it be the locals or the mestizos, the only thing important to them is themselves.
Although Don Costudio was against the slavery, it was only because he was not the one
being exalted in the idea proposed. I think they think of the Indios still as nothing but
pieces in their game for power and fame.
As to Rizal’s views on the friars, he described them according to their individual
attitude and standing in life. He was showing them as people of pretense, selfishness,
and narcissism.
4. How will you describe Don Custodio and Ben Zayb from the text?
Pretentious. I think they were against the slavery that Se ñor Simoun was proposing
just because it was not their idea and it did not give them any glory but rather a sense of
shame and disgrace for being defeated over an argument.