Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Objective
At the end of the discussion, participants shall be able
to: 1.Discuss the importance and goal of risk
assessment;
2.Determine how to use the risk matrix and risk
ratings upon identifying hazards in the workplace;
3.Conduct workplace risk assessment; and
4.Determine classification of risk level of
workplace
HAZARD
HAZARDIDENTIFICATION, RISK
IDENTIFICATION, RISK
ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENTAND
AND CONTROL
CONTROL
INTRODUCTION
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK
ASSESSMENT AND CONTROL
Certified first- Low risk Medium risk esta Micro and Small
aider – any establishment – a blishment – a Enterprises
person trained and workplace where workplace where (MSEs) –
there is low level there is moderate establishments
duly certified to
of danger or exposure to employing less
administer first aid
exposure to safety safety and health than 10 employees
by the Philippine and health hazard hazards and with and the
Red Cross (PRC) or s or with low probability of an establishments
any organization probability to accident, injury or employing less
authorized by the result in accident, illness than 100
harm or illness employees
DOLE Secretary
Section 3. DEFINITION OF
TERMS
High risk establishment – refers to a workplace wherein the
presence of hazard or potential hazard within the company may affect
the safety and/or health of workers not only within but also persons
outside the premises of the establishment. The following are work-
places commonly associated with potentially high-risk activities:
1. Chemical works and chemical 11. Power generation, transmission and
production plants; distribution in the energy sector;
2. Construction; 12. Storage and distribution center for toxic
3. Deep sea fishing; or hazardous chemicals;
13.
4. Explosives and pyrotechnics Storage of fertilizers in high volume;
factories; 14. Transportation;
5. Firefighting; 15. Water supply, sewerage, waste
6. Healthcare facilities; management, remediation activities;
7. Installation of communication 16. Works in which chlorine is used in bulk;
accessories, towers and cables; 17. Activities closely similar to those
8. LPG filling, refilling, storage and enumerated above and other activities as
distribution; determined by DOLE in accordance with
9. Mining; existing issuances on the classification of
10. Petrochemical works and refineries; establishments.
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND
RISK ASSESSMENT AND CONTROL (HIRAC)
Remember..
DEFINITIONS
KEY STEPS IN IDENTIFYING HAZARDS
2. RISK ASSESSMENT
- is a technique to identify the level of risk a hazard
possess in order to determine the prioritization order
required in addressing the numerous hazards in a
workplace .
-
analyze and evaluate the risk attached to the hazard
(risk analysis and evaluation.
Hazard
Anything (e.g. condition, situation, practice, behavior) that has
the potential to cause harm, including injury, disease, death,
environmental, property and equipment damage. A hazard can
be a thing or a situation.
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK
ASSESSMENT AND CONTROL
Likelihood
is the chance that the hazardous event will occur
SEVERITY
The result of hazardous event where hazard has taken its effect
to the receiver.
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK
ASSESSMENT AND CONTROL
Risk
The chance or probability that a person will be harmed
or experience an adverse health effect if exposed to a
hazard. It may also apply to situations with property or
equipment loss.
Tolerable Risk
“risk that has been reduced to a level that can be
endured by the organization having regard to its
legal obligations and its own OH & S policy”
Residual Risk
The amount of Risk that remains after the
application of control measure.
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK
ASSESSMENT AND CONTROL
Likelihood
is the chance that the hazardous event will occur
SEVERITY
The result of hazardous event where hazard has taken its effect
to the receiver.
Risk = Likelihood X Severity
22
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT and CONTROL (HIRAC) Form
Group No. _________
Members:
1. Hazard Identification 2. Risk Assessment (Initial 3. Risk Control
Evaluation)
W
o Propos
Due
Existing Risk ed
rk
Date
A Contro
No
Hazard( Possible Control (if Proba Prob Sever Residu /
c
s) Effects Severity Risk l
ability ity al Risk Statu
ti any) bility Measu
vi s
ty
re(s)
1
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK
ASSESSMENT AND CONTROL
RISK ASSESSMENT
PROCEDURE
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK
ASSESSMENT AND CONTROL
3.ALMOST
u Occurs during normal everyday
practice.
27
EVALUATE THE RISK
2 x 3 = 6 (H)
Ergonomic Back pain 1 – severity
Hazard (minor)
3 – likelihood
(highly)
1 x 3 = 3 (M)
Electrical Injury, death (electrocution) 3 - severity (major)
2 - likelihood
(likely)
3 x 2 = 6 (H)
Risk Rating
LIKELIHOOD SEVERITY
1 – Rare 1 Insignificant
2 – unlikely 2 – Minor
3 – Possible 3 – Moderate
4 – Likely 4 – Major
5 – Almost 5 – Catastrophic
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK
ASSESSMENT AND CONTROL
SEVERITY/Consequence Evaluation
CONSEQUENCES HOW SEVERELY COULD SOMEONE BE HURT?
5-Catastrophic Death or permanent disability
4-Major Serious injury, hospital treatment, more than 3 days absent
3-Moderate Injury requiring medical treatment and some lost time
2-Minor Minor Injury, requires first aid
1-Insignificant No injury, no treatment or first aid
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK
ASSESSMENT AND CONTROL
Likelihood Evaluation
LIKELIHOOD HOW LIKELY ARE THE CONSEQUENCES?
5-Almost Expected to occur in most circumstances (1/100)
4-Likely Will probably occur in most circumstances (1/1,000)
3-Possible Might occur occasionally (1/10,000)
2-Unlikely Could happen some time (1/100,000)
1- Rare May happen only in exceptional circumstances
(1/1,000,000)
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK
ASSESSMENT AND CONTROL
RISK MATRIX
Severity
Likelihood Insignificant Minor Moderate Major Catastrophic
1 2 3 4 5
Almost MODERATE HIGH HIGH EXTREME EXTREME
5 (5) (10) (15) (20) (25)
Likely LOW MODERATE HIGH HIGH EXTREME
4 (4) (8) (12) (16) (20)
Possible LOW MODERATE MODERATE HIGH HIGH
3 (3) (6) (9) (12) (15)
Unlikely LOW LOW MODERATE MODERATE HIGH
2 (2) (4) (6) (8) (10)
Rare LOW LOW LOW LOW MODERATE
1 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK
ASSESSMENT AND CONTROL
Severity
Likelihood Insignificant Minor Moderate Major Catastrophic
1 2 3 4 5
Almost MODERATE HIGH HIGH EXTREME EXTREME
5 (5) (10) (15) (20) (25)
Likely LOW MODERATE HIGH HIGH EXTREME
4 (4) (8) (12) (16) (20)
Possible LOW MODERATE MODERATE HIGH HIGH
3 (3) (6) (9) (12) (15)
Unlikely LOW LOW MODERATE MODERATE HIGH
2 (2) (4) (6) (8) (10)
Rare LOW LOW LOW LOW MODERATE
1 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Legend:
L Low Risk 1-4– considered acceptable. No further action of CMs are necessary
M Moderate Risk 5-9– relatively acceptable. However, further CMs should be considered and existing CMs
should be monitored
H High Risk 10-16– unacceptable level of risk. CMs must be developed and implemented in short to medium
term
E Extreme Risk 17-25– unacceptable level of risk. CMs must be immediately implemented or the risk eliminated
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK
ASSESSMENT AND CONTROL
R= LXS
W Pro
o pos
r
Existing ed
Due
k Risk Co Date
A
Hazard(
Possibl Probability/ Prob
Sever Residu /
No Severity ntro
c
ti s)
e Control LIKELIHOOD S
Risk l
abilit
ity al Risk Statu
Effects y
v (if any) L Me s
it asur
y e(s)
1
4 5 4x5=20
RISK MATRIX
RISK ASSESSMENT
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK
ASSESSMENT AND CONTROL
RECAP
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK
ASSESSMENT AND CONTROL
____________________________
____________________________
1. ____________________________
2. ____________________________
3. ____________________________
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK
ASSESSMENT AND CONTROL
Hierarchy of Controls
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK
ASSESSMENT AND CONTROL
RECAP
REVIEW QUIZ 57
1. ____________________________
2. ____________________________
3. ____________________________
WORKSHOP
HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION
HIRAC
59
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT and CONTROL (HIRAC) Form
Group No. _________
Members:
1. Hazard 2. Risk Assessment (Initial Evaluation) 3. Risk Control
Identification
R=LXS
W Propos
or Due
ed
k Possi
Existing Risk Date
N A Hazard ble
Contro
Prob Sever Residu
Proba /
o ct (s) Effe Control (if any) bility Severity Risk l
ability ity al Risk Statu
ivi Measu
cts s
ty re(s)
WELDING - 2
1
“
Can You Spot the Hazards?
60
1
“
Can You Spot the Hazards?
62
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK
ASSESSMENT AND CONTROL
Severity
Likelihood Insignificant Minor Moderate Major Catastrophic
1 2 3 4 5
Almost MODERATE HIGH HIGH EXTREME EXTREME
5 (5) (10) (15) (20) (25)
Likely LOW MODERATE HIGH HIGH EXTREME
4 (4) (8) (12) (16) (20)
Possible LOW MODERATE MODERATE HIGH HIGH
3 (3) (6) (9) (12) (15)
Unlikely LOW LOW MODERATE MODERATE HIGH
2 (2) (4) (6) (8) (10)
Rare LOW LOW LOW LOW MODERATE
1 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Legend:
L Low Risk 1-4– considered acceptable. No further action of CMs are necessary
M Moderate Risk 5-9– relatively acceptable. However, further CMs should be considered and existing CMs
should be monitored
H High Risk 10-16– unacceptable level of risk. CMs must be developed and implemented in short to medium
term
E Extreme Risk 17-25– unacceptable level of risk. CMs must be immediately implemented or the risk eliminated
“…Make a change. Don’t give risk a chance…”