References To Appendix

REFERENCES
Printed Books
Bagdon, K. & Goss, H. (1997). Teaching and learning on the Internet: Developing a
resource for academic support (1 sted.). Southern Cross University, Australia:
Third Australian
Becker, Gary S. 1964. Human capital: a theoretical and empirical analysis, with
special reference to education. (3 rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago
Press.
Brack, C. (1996). Linking the data to develop knowledge: A neglected part of

zdeveloping web-based university resource (2 nd ed.). Gold Coast, Australia:
Ausweb96.
Harasim, L. (2017).Learning theory and online technologies.Taylor& Francis.

(1sted.). New York: Routledge
Website
Albert, J. G., Santos, A. F., & Vizmanos, J. V. (n.d.).Unmasking the middle class:
Profile and determinants. Retrieved July 16, 2020, from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344096899_A_Study_on_the_Impct
_of_Socioeconomic_Status_on_EmergencyElectronic_Learning_during_the_
Coronavirus_Lockdown
Alipio, M., 2020. Do socioeconomic indicators associate with COVID-2019 cases?

Findings from a Philippine study. Retrieved April 9, 2020, from
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3573353
Amadora, M. (2020). Common Problems that occur During Online Classes.

Retrieved September 18, 2020 from https://mb.com.ph/2020/09/18/common-
problems-that-occur- during-online-classes/
Anderson, T. (2008). The theory and practice of online learning. Retrieved

2008, from https://auspace.athabascau.ca/bitstream/handle/2149/411/?
sequece=1
Ashton, H. & Zalzala, A. (2000). Enhancing traditional learning: The use of

multimedia material on the Internet. Retrieved Jan 26, 2003, from
http://www.ics.ltsn.ac.uk/pub/conf2000/Papers/ashton.
Caintic, E.R. (2020). Need To Know: Bakit Mabagal Ang Internet Speed Sa
Pilipinas?. Retrieved October 9, 2020, from
https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/video/gmadigitalspecials/542465/need-
to-know-bakit-mabagal-ang-internet-speed-sa-pilipinas/video/
Cronje, M. (2001). Experiences of lecturers using WebCT from a technology

adoption perspective. Retrieved September 5, 2012, from
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED538342.pdf
Daguno-Bersamina, K., & Relativo, J. (2020). Life After Lockdown: How schools and
classes will be like in the Philippines. Retrieved July 14, 2020, from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344096899_A_Study_on_the_Impa
ct_of_Socioeconomic_Status_on_Emergency_ElectronicLearning_during_th
e_Coronavirus_Lockdown
Deacon, A., Paxton, M. & Carr, T. (2000). Creating a project-based learning

environment for commerce courses by customizing an Office suite. Retrieved
January 26, 2003, from http://www.upe.ac.za/citte2000/docs/adeacon.doc]
Guatam, P (2020). Advantages And Disadvantages Of Online Learning. Retrieved

October 10, 2020, from https://elearningindustry.com/advantages-and-
disadvantages- online-learning
Hernando-Malipot, M. (2020). Internet Connection Problems Beyond Our Control-

DepEd. Retrieved October 6, 2020, from
https://mb.com.ph/2020/10/06/internet-connection-problems-beyond-our-
control-deped/
Isla, R., (2020). The Pros and Cons of Online Learning in the Philippines. Retrieved
September 17, 2020, from https://www.moneysmart.ph/articles/the-pros-and-
cons-of-online-learning-in-the-Philippines-moneysmart-2020/
Kearsley, G. & Shneiderman, B. (1999). Engagement theory: A framework for

technology-based teaching and learning. Retrieved January 26, 2003, from
http://home.sprynet.com/~gkearsley/engage.htm
Kritz, I. (2020) PH not ready for online schooling. Retrieved June 9, 2021, from
https://www.manilatimes.net/2020/06/11/campus-press/ph-notreadyfor
onlineschooling/730998/
Lynch, M. (2017). The Absence of Internet at Home is a Problem for some

students.Retrieved March 31, 2017, from https://www.theedadvocate.org/the-
absence-of-internet-athome-is-a-problem-for-some-students/
Mateo, J. (2020). Tech woes among top concerns for distance learning. Retrieved
August 2, 2020. From
https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2020/08/02/2032336/tech-woes-among-
top-concerns-distance-learning
Moneymax (2020). What Is Distance Learning and How Does It Work?. Retrieved
January 9, 2020, from https://www.moneymax.ph/lifestyle/articles/distance-
learning-Philippines
Olandes, A. (2020). Need To Know: Bakit Mabagal Ang Internet Speed Sa

Pilipinas?. Retrieved October 9, 2020, from
https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/video/gmadigitalspecials/542465/needtok
now-bakit-mabagal-ang-internet-speedsapilipinas/video/
Santos, A., (2020). In the Philippines, distance learning reveals the digital divide.
Retrieved October 6, 2020, from
https://eu.boell.org/en/2020/10/06/philippines-distance-learn7
Singh, S. & Erwin, G. (2001).The rush to the web. Retrieved September 5, 2012,
from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED538342.pdf
Slay, J. (1997). The use of the Internet in creating an effective learning environment.
Retrieved January 28, 2003, from
https://ausweb.scu.edu.au/aw97/papers/slay/index.htm
Tan, J. & Wong, S. (1996). The Internet as a learning tool: Planning perspectives
(The Singapore experience). Retrieved January 28, 2003, from
https://www.isoc.org/inet96/proceedings/c6/c6_3.htm
Vera, A., & Bresnahan, T. (2017). The impact of the Philippine ISP duopoly on
mobile broadband adoption. Retrieved 2020, from
https://economics.stanford.edu/sites/g/files/sbiybj9386/f/publications/
vera_anton_honors_thesis_3-13-17.pdf
Journal
Acosta, M. (2016).Paradigm Shift in Open Education and E-Learning

Resources as Teaching and Learning in Philippines.
JurnalIlmiahPeuradeun, 4(2), 161-172. https://dx.
doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v4i2.94
Alvarez, A. Jr. (2020). The phenomenon of learning at a distance through

emergency remote teaching amidst the pandemic crisis. Asian Journal of
Distance Education, 15(1), 144-153. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3881529
Arinto, P. (2007). Going the distance: Towards a new professionalism for full-time
distance education faculty at the University of the Philippines.The
International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 8(3),
144153.https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v8i3.409
Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A.,Wozney, L., Wallet,
P. A., Fiset, M., & Huang, B. (2004). How Does Distance Education Compare
With Classroom Instruction? A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical
Literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379–
439. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074003379
Boelens, R., De Wever, B., &Voet, M. (2017). Four key challenges to the design of
blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Research
Review, 5(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.06.001
Bozkurt, A. (2019). From distance education to open and distance learning: A

holistic evaluation of history, definitions, and theories. In Handbook of
Research on Learning in the Age of Transhumanism, 15(1), 252-273.
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8431-5.ch01
Bradley, R. H., Corwyn, R. F., McAdoo, H. P., & García, C. (2001).The home
environments of children in the United States Part I: Variations by age,
ethnicity, and poverty status. Child Development, 72, 1844-1867.
https://doi:10.1111/1467- 8624.t01-1-00382
Davies, J., & Graff, M. (2005). Performance in e‐learning: onlineparticipation and

student grades. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 657-663.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14678535.2005.00542.
dela Pena-Bandalaria, M. (2007). Impact of ICTs on open and distance learning in a

developing country setting: The Philippine experience. International Review
of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(1),
1-15.https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v8i1.334
Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N.(2018). Blended
learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of
Educational Technology in Higher Education,15(1),
3.https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5
Hermawan, D. (2019). Students’ perception on e-learning: a basis for the

development of e-learning framework in higher education institutions. The
International Conference on Information Technology and Digital
Applications,482. https://doi:10.1088/1757-899X/482/1/012008
Horzum, M. B. (2017). Interaction, structure, social presence, and satisfaction in

online learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology
Education, 11(3), 505-512.https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1324a
Jung, I. (2019). Introduction to theories of open and distance education. In Open

and Distance Education Theory Revisited. Springer. 15(1), 144-153.
https://doi.org/10.1007 /978-981-13-7740-2_1
Liu, Z., & Qiu, Z. (2018). How does family background affect children’s educational
achievement? Evidence from Contemporary China.The Journal Chinese
Sociology.5, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-018-0083-8
Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., Hillemeier, M. M., & Maczuga, S. (2009). Risk factors for
learning-related behavior problems at 24 months Of age: Population-based
estimates. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 401-413.
https://doi:10.1007/s10802-008-9279-8
Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P. R., & Sharma, D. (2018).Online learning: Adoption,

continuance, and learning outcome—A review of literature. International
Journal of Information Management, 43, 1-14.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.05.005
Parsons-Pollard, N., Diehl Lacks, R., &Hylton Grant, P. (2008). A comparative

assessment of student learning outcomes in large online and traditional
campus-based introduction to criminal justice courses. Criminal Justice
Studies, 21(3), 239-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786010802355826
Roberts, T., & Hernandez, K. (2019).Digital Access is not Binary: The 5'A's of
Technology Access in the Philippines. Electronic Journal of Information
Systems in Developing Countries, 85 (4) 19-20.
https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12084
Simpson, O. (2018). Supporting students in online, open and distance learning.

Routledge. 15(1), 144-153.https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203417003
Tsai, M. J. (2009). The model of strategic e-learning: Understanding and evaluating

student e-learning from metacognitive perspectives. Educational Technology
& Society, 12(1), 34-48. http://www.ifets.info/abstract.php?art\_id=908
Valdez, G., McNabb, M., Foertsch, M., Anderson, M., Hawkes, M. & Raack, L.
(2000). Computer-based technology and learning: Evolving uses and
expectations. North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL). 41.
http://www.ncrel.org/tplan/cbtl/toc.htm
Wang, S., Minku, L. L., & Yao, X. (2018). A systematic study of online class
imbalance learning with concept drift. IEEE transactions on neural networks
and learning systems, 29(10), 4802-4821.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2017.2771290
Weller, M., Jordan, K., DeVries, I., & Rolfe, V. (2018). Mapping the open education
landscape: citation network analysis of historical open and distance
education research. Open Praxis, 10(2), 109- 126.
https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.10.2.822
APPENDIX 1
Republic of the Philippines

SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY
College of Teacher Education
` ACCESS, EJC Montilla, Tacurong City
APPLICATION FOR TITLE DEFENSE
January 27, 2021

The Dean
CTE – SKSU
City of Tacurong
Madam,
This is to inform your Office that the undersigned had satisfactorily completed all
the requirements for them to present their proposal. In this connection, they would like to
apply for the title defense on January 05, 2021 at Sultan Kudarat State University.
Likewise, the Advisory Committee was informed and had affixed their respective
signatures as shown below:
Thank you.
Very truly yours:
ANGELLE S. ALEMANIA
IRENE MAE M. CARIÑO

(Name and Signature of the Applicant)
CARILYN D. MARTIN, EnP, MSERM MAY NETAR CYRYLL L. TABARES, PhD

Member Member
ADRIAN V. PROTACIO, PhD

Adviser
Recommending Approval:
MARY GRACE O GALLEGO, PhD RIZALYN B. CUDERA, MSc.

Chairperson, BEED Program CTE Research Coordinator
Approved:
NANCY B. ESPACIO, EdD
Dean, College of Teacher Education
APPENDIX 2

ACCESS, EJC Montilla, Tacurong City
APPLICATION FOR PROPOSAL DEFENSE
March 01, 2021

The Dean
CTE – SKSU
City of Tacurong
Madam,
This is to inform your Office that the undersigned had satisfactorily completed all
the requirements for them to present their proposal. In this connection, they would like to
apply for the proposal defense on March 01, 2021 at Sultan Kudarat State University.
Thank you.
Very truly yours:
ANGELLE S. ALEMANIA


Member Member

Adviser

Approved:
APPENDIX 3

APPLICATION FOR THE CONDUCT OF THE STUDY
June 11, 2021

The Dean
CTE – SKSU
City of Tacurong
Madam,
The undersigned would like to request your good office permit to conduct the
approved study entitled INTERNET CONNECTION AND ITS EFFECT ON THE
ACHIEVEMENT OF BEED 3RD YEAR STUDENTS OF SKSU DURING THE COVID-19
PANDEMIC.
The Advisory Committee had approved the outline of the research proposal as
reflected by their respective signatures below as recommended for approval of the
conduct.
Thank you.
Very truly yours:
ANGELLE S. ALEMANIA


Member Member

Advise
r

Approved:
APPENDIX 4
Signed data validation tool
Survey/Interview Validation Rubric for Expert Panel - VREP©
By Marilyn K. Simon with input from Jacquelyn White
Criteria Operational Definitions Score Questions NOT
1=Not Acceptable meeting
(major modifications standard and
needed) need to be
2=Below Expectations revised.
(some modifications (List page and
needed) question
3=Meets Expectations
number)
(no modifications needed
Please use the
but could be improved
with minor changes) comments and
4=Exceeds Expectations suggestions
(no modifications section to
needed) recommend
revisions.
1 2 3 4
 The questions are direct
and specific.
 Only one question is √
Clarity asked at a time.
 The participants can
understand what is being
asked.
 There are no double-
barreled questions (two
questions in one).
 Questions are concise.
Wordiness  There are no √
unnecessary words
 Questions are asked
Negative using the affirmative
Wording (e.g., Instead of asking, √
“Which methods are not
used?”, the researcher
asks, “Which methods
are used?”)
1
 No response covers
Overlapping more than one choice. √
Responses  All possibilities are
considered.
 There are no ambiguous
questions.
 The questions are
Balance unbiased and do not √
lead the participants to a
response. The questions
are asked using a
neutral tone.
 The terms used are
Use of understandable by the √
Jargon target population.
 There are no clichés or
hyperbole in the wording
of the questions.
 The choices listed allow
Appropriaten participants to respond
ess of appropriately. √
Responses  The responses apply to
Listed all situations or offer a
way for those to respond
with unique situations.
Use of  The use of technical
Technical language is minimal and √
Language appropriate.
 All acronyms are defined
Application  The questions asked
to Praxis relate to the daily √
practices or expertise of
the potential participants.
sufficient to resolve the
Relationship problem in the study √
to Problem  The questions are
sufficient to answer the
research questions.
sufficient to obtain the
2
purpose of the study.
Measure of  The survey adequately
Construct A: measures this construct. √
SOP 1 ___________________
Construct B: measures this construct. √
SOP 2 ________________
Construct C: measures this construct. √
SOP 3 _________
Construct D: measures this construct. √
SOP 4 ________________
KEVIN BELVIS
Validator’s Name
3
Criteria Operational Definitions Score Questions
1=Not Acceptable NOT
(major modifications meeting
needed) standard and
2=Below Expectations need to be
(some modifications revised.
needed) (List page
3=Meets Expectations and question
(no modifications number)
needed but could be Please use
improved with minor the
changes) comments
4=Exceeds and
Expectations suggestions
needed) recommend
d revisions.
1 2 3 4
and specific.
 Only one question is
Clarity asked at a time. √
asked.
questions in one).
Wordiness  There are no unnecessary √
words
 Questions are asked using
Negative the affirmative (e.g., √
Wording Instead of asking, “Which
methods are not used?”,
the researcher asks,
4
“Which methods are
used?”)
 No response covers more
Overlapping than one choice. √
considered.
questions.
Balance unbiased and do not lead √
the participants to a
are asked using a neutral
tone.
Use of understandable by the
Jargon target population. √
of the questions.
Responses  The responses apply to all
Listed situations or offer a way
for those to respond with
unique situations.
to Praxis relate to the daily practices √
or expertise of the
potential participants.
research questions.
5
Measure of  The survey adequately √
Construct A: measures this construct.
SOP 1 ____________________
SOP 2 ________________
SOP 3 _________
SOP 4 ________________
CHARLENE D. MARIANO
Validator’s Name
6

1=Not Acceptable NOT
(major modifications meeting
needed) standard
2=Below Expectations and need to
(some modifications be revised.
needed) (List page
3=Meets Expectations and
(no modifications question
needed but could be number)
improved with minor Please use
changes) the
4=Exceeds comments
Expectations and
(no modifications suggestion
needed) s section to
recommend
d revisions.
1 2 3 4
and specific.
asked.
questions in one).
words
7
used?”)
considered.
questions.
tone.
of the questions.
unique situations.
or expertise of the
research questions.
8
SOP 1 ____________________
SOP 2 ________________
SOP 3 _________
SOP 4 ________________
MICHELLE ANGELA E. SANDIGAN

Validator’s Name
9
10

1=Not Acceptable NOT meeting
(major modifications standard
needed) and need to
2=Below Expectations be revised.
(some modifications (List page
needed) and
3=Meets Expectations question
changes) comments
4=Exceeds and
needed) recommend
d revisions.
1 2 3 4
and specific.
asked.
questions in one).
words
Negative the affirmative (e.g.,
Wording Instead of asking, “Which √
used?”)
11
considered.
questions.
tone.
of the questions.
unique situations.
or expertise of the
Relationship problem in the study
to Problem  The questions are √
research questions.
12
SOP 1 ____________________
SOP 2 ________________
SOP 3 _________
SOP 4 ________________
JULIE ROSE VIERNES

Validator’s Name
13

needed) and need to
needed) and
changes) comments
4=Exceeds and
needed) recommend
d revisions.
1 2 3 4
and specific.
asked.
questions in one).
words
14
used?”)
considered.
questions.
tone.
of the questions.
 The choices listed allow √
unique situations.
or expertise of the
research questions.
15
SOP 1 ____________________
SOP 2 ________________
SOP 3 _________
SOP 4 ________________
CHRISTIAN JADE G. QUIJANO

Validator’s Name
16

needed) and need to
needed) and
changes) comments
4=Exceeds and
needed) recommend
d revisions.
1 2 3 4
and specific.
asked.
questions in one).
words
17
used?”)
considered.
questions.
tone.
of the questions.
unique situations.
or expertise of the
research questions.
18
SOP 1 ____________________
SOP 2 ________________
SOP 3 _________
SOP 4 ________________
RODNE RUFINO
Validator’s Name
19

needed) and need to
needed) and
changes) comments
4=Exceeds and
needed) recommend
d revisions.
1 2 3 4
and specific.
asked.
questions in one).
words
20
used?”)
considered.
questions.
tone.
of the questions.
unique situations.
or expertise of the
21
research questions.
SOP 1 ____________________
SOP 2 ________________
SOP 3 _________
SOP 4 ________________
JASPER GALBO
Validator’s Name
22

needed) and need to
needed) and
changes) comments
4=Exceeds and
needed) recommend
d revisions.
1 2 3 4
and specific.
asked.
questions in one).
words
23
used?”)
Overlapping than one choice.
Responses  All possibilities are √
considered.
questions.
Balance unbiased and do not lead
the participants to a √
tone.
of the questions.
unique situations.
or expertise of the
24
research questions.
SOP 1 ____________________
SOP 2 ________________
SOP 3 _________
SOP 4 ________________
JOANNE S. ALEMANIA
Validator’s Name
25

needed) and need to
needed) and
changes) comments
4=Exceeds and
needed) recommend
d revisions.
1 2 3 4
and specific.
asked.
questions in one).
26
words
used?”)
considered.
questions.
tone.
Use of understandable by the
Jargon target population. √
of the questions.
unique situations.
or expertise of the
27
research questions.
SOP 1 ____________________
SOP 2 ________________
SOP 3 _________
SOP 4 ________________
MARY JEAN SORBITO

Validator’s Name
28

needed) and need to
needed) and
changes) comments
4=Exceeds and
needed) recommend
d revisions.
1 2 3 4
and specific.
asked.
questions in one).
29
words
Negative  Questions are asked using

Wording the affirmative (e.g., √
Instead of asking, “Which
used?”)
considered.
questions.
tone.
of the questions.
unique situations.
30
or expertise of the
research questions.
SOP 1 ____________________
SOP 2 ________________
SOP 3 _________
SOP 4 ________________
COLLYN RUTH BRASELINO

Validator’s Name
31

needed) and need to
needed) and
changes) comments
4=Exceeds and
needed) recommend
d revisions.
1 2 3 4
and specific.
asked.
32
questions in one).
words
used?”)
considered.
questions.
tone.
of the questions.
unique situations.
33
or expertise of the
research questions.
SOP 1 ____________________
SOP 2 ________________
SOP 3 _________
SOP 4 ________________
JEVIE ANNE N. PALCONE

Validator’s Name
34

needed) and need to
needed) and
changes) comments
4=Exceeds and
needed) recommend
d revisions.
1 2 3 4
and specific.
asked.
35
questions in one).
words
used?”)
considered.
questions.
tone.
of the questions.
Appropriaten participants to respond √
ess of appropriately.
unique situations.
36
or expertise of the
research questions.
SOP 1 ____________________
SOP 2 ________________
SOP 3 _________
SOP 4 ________________
LORNA G. NANALI
Validator’s Name
37
Operational Definitions Score Questions

Criteria 1=Not Acceptable NOT meeting
needed) and need to
needed) and
changes) comments
4=Exceeds and
needed) recommend
d revisions.
38
1 2 3 4
and specific.
asked.
questions in one).
words
used?”)
considered.
questions.
tone.
of the questions.
Appropriaten participants to respond √
39
ess of appropriately.
unique situations.
or expertise of the
research questions.
SOP 1 ____________________
SOP 2 ________________
SOP 3 _________
SOP 4 ________________
RENA G. SEDICO
Validator’s Name
40

needed) and need to
needed) and
changes) comments
4=Exceeds and
needed) recommend
41
d revisions.
1 2 3 4
and specific.
asked.
questions in one).
words
used?”)
Overlapping than one choice.
Responses  All possibilities are √
considered.
questions.
tone.
of the questions.
42
unique situations.
or expertise of the
research questions.
SOP 1 ____________________
SOP 2 ________________
SOP 3 _________
43
SOP 4 ________________
QUINCY N. ADUCA
Validator’s Name
44

needed) and need to
needed) and
changes) comments
4=Exceeds and
needed) recommend
d revisions.
1 2 3 4
and specific.
asked.
questions in one).
words
used?”)
45
considered.
questions.
tone.
of the questions.
unique situations.
or expertise of the
research questions.
46
SOP 1 ____________________
SOP 2 ________________
SOP 3 _________
SOP 4 ________________
Comments and Suggestions

The questions does answer to what is being sought in the statement of the
problem, however, a minor revision might be necessary in order to the respondents to
easily grasp and respond accordingly and appropriately.
Some terminologies might be sound better if changed.
For an instant:
Part 1. What percentage of BEED students belong to each of the groupings below?
Student with strong internet connection
Student with limited internet connection
Student with no internet connection at all
Suggestion:
You might also want to consider revising your SOP #3 to match with the
questionnaire or change the question in #3 in the questionnaire to match with the SOP
#3.
FRANCIS MARZO
Validator’s Name
47
APPENDIX 5

ACCESS, EJC Montilla, City of Tacurong
CERTIFICATE OF STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
This is to certify that the thesis entitled: “INTERNET STATUS AND STUDENTS’
ACHIEVEMENT OF SKSU BEEd 3RD YEAR STUDENTS DURING THE COVID-19
PANDEMIC” authored by ALEMANIA, ANGELLE S. and CARIÑO, IRENE MAE M. has
undergo statistical analysis.
This certification is issued to ensure that the University received quality research
work.
Signed
SHAILLA MAE D. NANALI
48
APPENDIX 6

ACCESS, EJC Montilla, City of Tacurong
GRAMMARIAN’S CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the undersigned has reviewed all the pages of the thesis
entitled: "INTERNET STATUS AND STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT OF SKSU BEEd 3RD
YEAR STUDENTS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC” authored by
ALEMANIA, ANGELLE S. and CARIÑO, IRENE MAE M. aligned with the set of
structural rules that govern the composition of sentence, phrases, and words in English
language.
Signed
FRANCIS MARZO
49
APPENDIX 7

APPLICATION FOR FINAL DEFENSE
April 21, 202

The
Dean
CTE-SKSU
City of Tacurong
Madam,
2
This is to inform your Office that the undersigned had satisfactorily completed
all the requirements for him/her to present his/her thesis/dissertation.
In this connection, he/she would like to apply for the Final Defense on April 21,
2022 at Accreditation Room, Sultan Kudarat State University – ACCESS Campus.
Likewise, the Advisory Committee was informed and had affixed their
respective signatures as shown below:
Thank you.
Very truly yours
ANGELLE S. ALEMANIA

(Name and Signature of Applicant)

Member Member

Advise
r

Approved:
110
APPENDIX 8

APPLICATION FOR FINAL PRINTING AND BINDING
Date
The Dean CTE – SKSU
City of Tacurong
Madam,
The undersigned would like to apply for FINAL PRINTING AND BINDING of the
thesis, which was successfully defended on at .
Thank you.
Very truly yours:
ANGELLE S. ALEMANIA

FRANCIS MARZO SHAILA NANALI

Grammarian Statistician

Member Member

Adviser

Approved:
1
APPENDIX 9
Data Gathering Instruments
a. Instructional Materials
The researchers made 3 parts of questions that contains in the
survey questionnaires, where they can write their answer on it. In conducting the
survey, the researchers used the Google platform, sending Google link to the
respondents to answer what was asked in the form.
b. Test Questionnaire
PART I
SOP 1. What is the profile of BEEd 3rd year students in terms of:
1.1 Location;
1.2 Parents/Guardians Educational Attainment;
1.3 Parents/Guardians employment status;
1:4 Person who support the family;
1:5 Parents/Guardians’ Income: and
1.6 Internet equipment?
Directions:
Please put a check and answer the following questions below.
1. Location:
Profile of BEED Students Locati
on
Region
Province
2
Municipality
Barangay
Education Attainment of Parents

2. What is the highest level of education your parents/guardian has
completed?
Elementary Graduate High School Graduate

College Graduate
3. Employment Status of Parents

1. Employed? Yes No
2. Who earns income to support your
family? Mother Father
Guardian Only
Brother Sister You
4. Income
1. What is your total combined family income for the past 12 months,
before taxes, (gross income) from all sources, wages, public
assistance/benefits, help from relatives?
If you don’t know your exact income, please estimate.
3. Internet Equipment used by BEED students?

Laptop Desktop Mobile Phones (Keypad)
Smartphone Tablet
PART II
SOP 2: What is the percentage of BEEd 3rd year students in terms of:
INTERNET CONNECTIVITY FREQUENCY
Limited Internet Connectivity 40
Having Internet Connectivity 17
No Internet Connectivity 0
Tot 57
al
SOP 3: What are the preferences of BEEd 3rd year students on the use of the
internet in terms of;
3.1 Using the internet; and
3
3.2 Schedule of using the internet
Directions:
Please put a check and answer the following questions below.
Do you like to use the Internet? Yes No
How often do you use the internet?

What is your preference in using the Internet?
Once a week
Twice a week
3 times a week
4 times a week
5 times a week
6 times a week
Everyday
Part III
SOP 4: What is the achievement of BEEd 3rd year students in achieving all the
subjects during face-to-face class and online class?
Direction:
Please write your answer in the space provided in the table.
What is your General Average in the following Semester?
4
1st Semester, 2nd 1stSemester, 3rd
Year (Face-to- Year
face) (Online)
C. Survey Instrument
The researchers made the survey questionnaire divided into 3 parts. Parts
1 are all about the profile of the respondents in terms of; location,
parents/guardians’ educational attainment, parents/guardians’ employment
status, person who supports the family, parents/guardians’ income and internet
equipment of student’s use. In Part 2, it comprised with student's internet status
in terms of their prepared and use. The Part 3 was all about the respondent's
achievement in all their subjects and their grade point average in the end of the
semester. The respondents had given enough time to answer the survey
questionnaire given by the researchers when they conducted the study.
5
APPENDIX 11
RAW DATA
SOP 1:
A. Profile of BEED 3rd Year
Loction Parents/ Parents/ Person Internet

Guardians Guardians who equipment
Educational employment support
Attainment status the
family
1 Bagumbayan High School No Sister Smartphone
Graduate
2 Bagumbayan High School No Father Smartphone
Graduate
3 Lambayong High School No Father Smartphone
Graduate
4 Norala College Graduate No Father Smartphone
5 BAGUMBAYAN High School No Mother, Smartphone
Graduate Father
6 Tacurong City High School No Brother, Laptop,
Graduate Sister Smartphone
7 Sto. Niño College Graduate Yes Mother, Smartphone
Father
8 TACURONG Elementary No Guardian Laptop,
CITY Graduate Only Desktop,
Smartphone
9 ISULAN High School No Mother Laptop,
Graduate Mobile Phone
(Keypad)
10 Tacurong City Elementary No Mother, Mobile Phone
Graduate Father, (Keypad)
Sister
11 Bagumbayan High School No Father Smartphone
Graduate
12 Bagumbayan High School No Mother, Laptop,
Graduate Father, Smartphone
Brother,
Sister
13 ESPERANZA High School Yes Father Smartphone
Graduate
14 ISULAN Elementary No Father Smartphone
Graduate
15 Banga College Graduate Yes Mother Smartphone
16 Banga High School Yes Father Smartphone
Graduate
17 Shariff Aguak, College Graduate Yes Father Laptop,
6
Maguindanao Smartphone
18 Isulan High School No Father Laptop,
Graduate Mobile Phone
(Keypad),
Smartphone
19 TACURONG College Graduate Yes Mother, Smartphone
Father
20 SURALLAH College Graduate No Father Smartphone
21 Lake Sebu Elementary Yes Mother, Smartphone
Graduate Father
22 Banga Elementary No Father Smartphone
Graduate
23 bagumbayan High School No Father Smartphone
Graduate
24 LAKE SEBU Elementary Yes Father, Laptop,
Graduate, High Sister Smartphone,
School Graduate, Tablet
College Graduate
25 Tacurong city College Graduate No Father Mobile Phone
(Keypad)
26 Isulan High School Yes Mother, Smartphone
Graduate Father, You
27 Surallah High School Yes Mother, Smartphone
Graduate Father
28 Isulan High School No Father Smartphone
Graduate
29 Koronadal City College Graduate Yes Mother, Laptop,
Father, Desktop,
Brother, Smartphone
Sister
30 LUTAYAN Elementary Yes Father Smartphone
Graduate
31 Pres. Quirino College Graduate Yes Mother, Laptop,
Father Smartphone
32 Sto. Niño High School No Father, Smartphone
Graduate Sister
33 Lambayong High School No Mother, Smartphone
Graduate, Sister
College Graduate
34 banga College Graduate No Mother, Smartphone
Sister
35 Columbio No Brother Smartphone
36 Surallah High School No Mother, Laptop,
Graduate Sister Smartphone
37 Bagumbayan High School No Mother, Laptop,
Graduate Father Smartphone
38 Tacurong City High School No Mother Smartphone
Graduate
39 Isulan College Graduate Yes Mother, Laptop,
Father Smartphone
40 Surallah College Graduate No Mother Laptop,
7
Smartphone
41 Surallah High School Yes Father Smartphone
Graduate
42 ISULAN High School No Father, Smartphone
Graduate Sister
43 Norala College Graduate Yes Mother, Laptop,
Father Smartphone
44 Mlang High School No Sister Laptop,
Graduate Smartphone
45 PRESIDENT High School No Father Smartphone
QUIRINO Graduate
46 TACURONG College Graduate No Father, Smartphone
CITY Brother,
Sister
47 Tacurong City College Graduate Yes Mother, Laptop,
Father, Smartphone
Sister
48 Isulan High School Yes Mother, Laptop,
Graduate Father Smartphone
49 BAGUMBAYAN High School No Brother, Smartphone
Graduate Sister, You
50 Banga High School Yes Father Laptop,
Graduate Smartphone
51 Banga High School No Father Laptop,
Graduate Smartphone
52 Lake Sebu College Graduate Yes Guardian Smartphone
Only
53 Isulan Elementary No Father Laptop,
Graduate Smartphone
54 Lake Sebu College Graduate Yes Father Laptop,
Smartphone
SOP 2:
Table 7. Students’ Internet Status
Respondents Status
1 Limited Internet
2 Limited Internet
3 Having Internet
4 Limited Internet
5 Limited Internet
6 Limited Internet
7 Limited Internet
8 Limited Internet
9 Having Internet
10 Limited Internet
11 Having Internet
12 Limited Internet
13 Limited Internet
14 Limited Internet
15 Limited Internet
8
16 Limited Internet
17 Having Internet
18 Limited Internet
19 Limited Internet
20 Limited Internet
21 Limited Internet
22 Limited Internet
23 Limited Internet
24 Limited Internet
25 Limited Internet
26 Limited Internet
27 Limited Internet
28 Limited Internet
29 Having Interne
30 Limited Internet
31 Having Internet
32 Limited Internet
33 Having Internet
34 Limited Internet
35 Limited Internet
36 Limited Internet
37 Having Internet
38 Limited Internet
39 Limited Internet
40 Limited Internet
41 Limited Internet
42 Having Internet
43 Having Internet
44 Limited Internet
45 Limited Internet
46 Having Internet
47 Limited Internet
48 Having Internet
49 Limited Internet
50 Limited Internet
51 Limited Internet
52 Having Internet
53 Having Internet
54 Limited Internet
SOP 3:
Table 8. Preference of the students in using the internet
Respondents Do you like using Internet?

1 Yes
2 Yes
3 Yes
4 Yes
5 Yes
6 No
9
7 Yes
8 Yes
9 Yes
10 Yes
11 Yes
12 Yes
13 Yes
14 Yes
15 No
16 Yes
17 Yes
18 Yes
19 Yes
20 Yes
21 Yes
22 Yes
23 Yes
24 Yes
25 Yes
26 Yes
27 Yes
28 No
29 Yes
30 Yes
31 Yes
32 Yes
33 Yes
34 Yes
35 Yes
36 Yes
37 Yes
38 Yes
39 Yes
40 Yes
41 Yes
42 Yes
43 Yes
44 Yes
45 Yes
46 Yes
47 Yes
48 Yes
49 Yes
50 Yes
51 Yes
52 Yes
53 Yes
54 Yes
10
SOP 4:
Table 9. Frequency of the students in using the internet
What is your preference in using

Respendents Internet?
1 Everyday
2 Everyday
3 Everyday
4 Everyday
5 Twice a week
6 Everyday
7 Everyday
8 Everyday
9 Everyday
10 Everyday
11 Everyday
12 Everyday
13 Twice a week
14 Everyday
15 Everyday
16 5 times a week
17 Everyday
18 Everyday
19 Everyday
20 Everyday
21 Everyday
22 Everyday
23 Everyday
24 Everyday
25 3 times a week
26 Everyday
27 Everyday
28 Twice a week
29 Everyday
30 Everyday
31 Everyday
32 3 times a week
33 Everyday
34 Everyday
35 3 times a week, 4 times a week
36 Everyday
37 Everyday
38 Everyday
39 5 times a week
11
40 Everyday
41 Everyday
42 Everyday
43 6 times a week
44 Everyday
45 Everyday
46 Everyday
47 Everyday
48 Everyday
49 6 times a week
50 Everyday
51 4 times a week
52 6 times a week
53 Everyday
54 Everyday
Table 10. Students Achievement during face-To-Face

Studen Grade Scale/Grade
ts s Intervals
38 85-90 Satisfactory
9 80 Poor
below
5 80-85 Fair
4 90-95 Very Satisfactory
1 95-100 Excellent
Table 11. Students’ Achievement during Online Class

Studen Grade Scale/Grade
ts s Intervals
38 85-90 Satisfactory
7 80-85 Fair
8 80 Poor
below
2 95-100 Excellent
2 90-95 Very Satisfactory
SOP 5:
Table 12. Significant Difference Between Students’ Academic Achievement

during Face-to-Face and Online
t- degree of freedom f Interpretatio Decision
test between within critic n
val the group the al
ue group value
a=
12
0.05
3.8958 5 57 2.668 there is a Reject
6 significan the Ho
ce (Null
difference Hypothes
is)
13
SOP 6:
Table 13. Significant Effect on the Academic Performance of Having

Internet Status
t-test degree of freedom f Interpretatio Decision
value betwee within critic n
n the the al
group group valu
e
a= 0.05
0.01192 1 1 2.12 there is Do not
6 7 no Reject
significan the
ce Ho (Null
difference Hypothesi
s)
Table 14. Significant Effect on the Academic Performance of Limited

Internet Status
t-test degree of freedom f Interpretatio Decision
value betwee within critic n
n the the al
group group value
a=
0.05
8.81 3 40 2.042 there is Reject
9 a the Ho
significan (Null
ce Hypothesi
difference s)
14
APPENDIX 12 Pictorials and Screenshots
15
PLAGIARISM CHECKED
16
FINAL DEFENSE RATING SHEET
Title of the Study:
"Internet Status and Students’ Achievement of SKSU BEEd 3 rd Year Students

during the COVID-19 Pandemic”
Researchers:
Alemania, Angelle S.
Cariño, Irene Mae M.
Research Adviser:
Date of Completion:
Directions: Analyze the research output based on the following criteria below. Write the
scores in the rating column based on the given specific weight.
CRITERIA Weight Rating

A. Quality of the Research Paper 50%
1. Relevance 5
2. Organization and format of the paper 5
3. Appropriateness of conceptual framework, theories, 5
principle, etc.
4. Appropriateness of research instrument(s) 5
5. Appropriateness/adequacy of population and samples 5
6. Supported findings with literature and statistical results 5
7. Clear presentation of findings, appropriate tables, figures 5
8. In-depth analysis and interpretation 5
9. Clear statement of findings, conclusions 5
and recommendations
10. Appropriate Outcome/Output of the study is presented 5
B. Oral Presentation 50%
1. Quality of Presentation 20
1.1 Evidence of careful planning and preparation (10)
1.2 Quality of communication presentation (10)
2. Ability to defend/answer question 20
2.1 Evidence of mastery of the paper (10)
2.2 Proficiency in articulating the result of the study (5)
2.2 Consistency and Reliability of the information (5)
3 Personal attributes of the presenter 10
100%
Rater:
Panel Member
17

References To Appendix

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

References To Appendix

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

REFERENCES

Brack, C. (1996). Linking the data to develop knowledge: A neglected part of

Harasim, L. (2017).Learning theory and online technologies.Taylor& Francis.

Alipio, M., 2020. Do socioeconomic indicators associate with COVID-2019 cases?

Amadora, M. (2020). Common Problems that occur During Online Classes.

Anderson, T. (2008). The theory and practice of online learning. Retrieved

Ashton, H. & Zalzala, A. (2000). Enhancing traditional learning: The use of

Cronje, M. (2001). Experiences of lecturers using WebCT from a technology

Deacon, A., Paxton, M. & Carr, T. (2000). Creating a project-based learning

Guatam, P (2020). Advantages And Disadvantages Of Online Learning. Retrieved

Hernando-Malipot, M. (2020). Internet Connection Problems Beyond Our Control-

Kearsley, G. & Shneiderman, B. (1999). Engagement theory: A framework for

Lynch, M. (2017). The Absence of Internet at Home is a Problem for some

Olandes, A. (2020). Need To Know: Bakit Mabagal Ang Internet Speed Sa

Acosta, M. (2016).Paradigm Shift in Open Education and E-Learning

Alvarez, A. Jr. (2020). The phenomenon of learning at a distance through

Bozkurt, A. (2019). From distance education to open and distance learning: A

Davies, J., & Graff, M. (2005). Performance in e‐learning: onlineparticipation and

dela Pena-Bandalaria, M. (2007). Impact of ICTs on open and distance learning in a

Hermawan, D. (2019). Students’ perception on e-learning: a basis for the

Horzum, M. B. (2017). Interaction, structure, social presence, and satisfaction in

Jung, I. (2019). Introduction to theories of open and distance education. In Open

Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P. R., & Sharma, D. (2018).Online learning: Adoption,

Parsons-Pollard, N., Diehl Lacks, R., &Hylton Grant, P. (2008). A comparative

Simpson, O. (2018). Supporting students in online, open and distance learning.

Tsai, M. J. (2009). The model of strategic e-learning: Understanding and evaluating

Republic of the Philippines

APPLICATION FOR TITLE DEFENSE

January 27, 2021

Very truly yours:

IRENE MAE M. CARIÑO

CARILYN D. MARTIN, EnP, MSERM MAY NETAR CYRYLL L. TABARES, PhD

ADRIAN V. PROTACIO, PhD

MARY GRACE O GALLEGO, PhD RIZALYN B. CUDERA, MSc.

Republic of the Philippines

APPLICATION FOR PROPOSAL DEFENSE

March 01, 2021

Very truly yours:

IRENE MAE M. CARIÑO

CARILYN D. MARTIN, EnP, MSERM MAY NETAR CYRYLL L. TABARES, PhD

ADRIAN V. PROTACIO, PhD

MARY GRACE O GALLEGO, PhD RIZALYN B. CUDERA, MSc.

Republic of the Philippines

APPLICATION FOR THE CONDUCT OF THE STUDY

June 11, 2021

IRENE MAE M. CARIÑO

CARILYN D. MARTIN, EnP, MSERM MAY NETAR CYRYLL L. TABARES, PhD

ADRIAN V. PROTACIO, PhD

MARY GRACE O GALLEGO, PhD RIZALYN B. CUDERA, MSc.

Criteria Operational Definitions Score Questions

MICHELLE ANGELA E. SANDIGAN

Criteria Operational Definitions Score Questions

JULIE ROSE VIERNES

Criteria Operational Definitions Score Questions

CHRISTIAN JADE G. QUIJANO

Criteria Operational Definitions Score Questions

Criteria Operational Definitions Score Questions

Criteria Operational Definitions Score Questions

Criteria Operational Definitions Score Questions

MARY JEAN SORBITO

Criteria Operational Definitions Score Questions

Negative  Questions are asked using

COLLYN RUTH BRASELINO