FTP - SAS Protocol - SADARAH

FACTORY TEST ITP No.
SAD/02/12
SIEMENS PROCEDURE
ARABIA ELECTRIC LTD (E) REV No. 0
ENERGY AUTOMATION
SAUDI ELECTRICITY COMPANY

(EASTREN REGION)
CONSTRUCTION OF SADARAH 380/230kV BSP IN JIC-2

SEC CONTRACT NO. 31133112/00
FACTORY TEST PROCEDURE

FOR
SUBSTATION AUTOMATION SYSTEM
SIEMENS LTD.
P. O. BOX 4621, JEDDAH 21412
SAUDI ARABIA
15-2-2012 FAT Procedure SAS (Rev. 0) Page 1 / 50

This document shall not be transmitted or reproduced, nor shall its contents be exploited or disclosed to third persons without prior written consent.
Infringements shall entitle to damage claims. All rights are reserved.
FACTORY TEST ITP No. SAD/02/12
SIEMENS PROCEDURE
ARABIA ELECTRIC LTD (E) REV No. 0
ENERGY AUTOMATION
CONSTRUCTION OF SADARAH 380/230kV

1 Project Name : BSP IN JUBAIL INDUSTRIAL CITY-2
SEC Contract No. 31133112/00
2 Client's PO. :
3 SIEMENS Contract No. : WBS # 79OP-00086.P
4 Name of Manufacturer : SIEMENS LTD.,
: ARABIA ELECTRIC LTD. (E)

5
Place of FAT & address P. O. Box 4621
Jeddah 21412
Saudi Arabia
6 Contact person : Mr. MUHAMMAD IQBAL
: Tel No. (02) 661 9931

7 Telephone No. / Telefax No.
Fax No. (02) 661 9031

SIEMENS
CONSTRUCTION OF SADARAH 380/230kV S/S BSP in JIC-2
Table of Contents
1 GENERAL...........................................................................................................5
1.1 The purpose of this document............................................................................................ 5
2 STATION LEVEL................................................................................................6
2.1 System Configuration.......................................................................................................... 6

2.1.1 Hardware check............................................................................................................... 6
2.1.2 Redundant Substation Controller SICAM PAS Fullserver................................................8
2.2 Communication................................................................................................................... 11
2.2.1 IEC 61850 Protocol....................................................................................................... 11
2.2.2 RuggedCom Switch RSG 2100 with IEC 61850 Communication Protocol....................12
2.2.3 Checking LED’s of RuggedCom Switches and accessing the switches........................12
2.3 Special Functions............................................................................................................... 15

2.3.1 Time Synchronization with Redundant GPS Timer Server as Master Clock..................15
2.4 Monitoring........................................................................................................................... 19
2.4.1 Acoustic Horn Activation via Binary Contact..................................................................19
3 BAY LEVEL......................................................................................................20
3.1 Communication of the Bay Devices to the Station Level via the IEC 61850 Protocol. .20
3.1.1 Optical connection......................................................................................................... 20

SIEMENS
3.2 Special Functions............................................................................................................... 23

3.2.1 Time synchronization via SNTP.....................................................................................23
3.3 Monitoring........................................................................................................................... 23
3.3.1 Indication Transmission via IEC 61850 Protocol at the HMI..........................................23
3.3.2 Indication Display at the Bay Device with Graphic Display............................................24
3.3.3 Optical Indication Display at the Bay Device with LEDs................................................25
3.4 Control................................................................................................................................. 25
3.4.1 Commands processing with the IEC 61850 Protocol....................................................26
3.4.2 Changing the Switching Authority (LOCAL/REMOTE) at the Bay Device with the Key
Switch 26
3.4.3 Control at the Bay Device with Graphic Display............................................................27

3.4.4 Bay and Substation Interlocking on Bay Level...............................................................28
3.5 Measurement....................................................................................................................... 31
3.5.1 Measurement Acquisition with Direct Connection to CT/VT..........................................31
3.6 Timing Test.......................................................................................................................... 31

3.6.1 Binary Input status in BCU & HMI......................................................................................32
3.6.2 Goose message running through time...............................................................................33
4 HMI....................................................................................................................32
4.1 System Configuration........................................................................................................ 33

4.1.1 HMI Configuration – Redundant Servers used as Two-Station System........................33
4.2 Operator Control and Monitoring – Display Structure and Navigation..........................35

4.2.1 Operating Concept with SICAM PAS CC.......................................................................35
4.2.2 Status Bar...................................................................................................................... 36
4.2.3 Login and Logout with SICAM PAS CC.........................................................................36
4.2.4 User Administration with SICAM PAS CC.....................................................................38
4.2.5 Displays......................................................................................................................... 41
4.2.5.1 System Overview....................................................................................................... 41
4.2.5.2 Bay Representation in the Detail Display...................................................................42
4.2.5.3 Help Picture............................................................................................................... 42
4.2.6 Indication List................................................................................................................. 43
4.2.6.1 Event List................................................................................................................... 43
4.2.6.2 Alarm list function....................................................................................................... 44
4.2.7 Printing.......................................................................................................................... 46
4.2.7.1 Message Logging with Line Printer............................................................................46
4.2.7.2 Hardcopy.................................................................................................................... 46
4.2.8 PRP Function................................................................................................................ 47
4.2.8.1 Testing PRP Function................................................................................................47
5 TELECONTROL PROTOCOL..........................................................................48
5.1 Control Center Connection with the Telecontrol Protocol IEC-60870-5-101 (Slave).............48

SIEMENS
1 General
1.1 The purpose of this document
During FACTORY ACCEPTANCE TEST the provided hardware and software solution will be
tested and the results will be recorded.
This test procedure will show the proper function of the provided system. A typical test will be
provided during FAT.
This document is limited for use by Siemens FAT representatives and respective customer
nominated representatives.
Within every test the necessary preconditions have been listed within the notes section prior to
carrying out the test. Columns checked or approved for every item under test are provided
together with one column for remarks. If a test point is not applicable this can be marked in the
column n/a.
The approval ensures that approved tests can be signed and closed off.
Occurring problems will be documented in a List of open Points (LoP). A consecutive number from
the LoP will be entered in the remarks column of the appropriate point.
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
Below is a listing of the Reference Documents that will be used during the FAT.
Sr.
Document Checklist Status Available
No.
SICAM PAS PANEL PANEL No. 1, 2,
1
3,4,5,6,7
2 SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE DIAGRAM
3 STATION SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM
4 Switches interfaces
5 Substation SU Controller Manual
Substation Automation System
6
Overview Diagram
Substation Automation System
7
Signal list (incl. I/O assignment)

SIEMENS
Test scenario 1
Description:
 Check that necessary documentation for equipment as listed above is available in hard copy
and soft copy
Result:
 Necessary documentation for equipment under test is available
Sr.No. Description checked approved n/a remarks
1 Equipment List check
2 Station Level
2.1 System Configuration

2.1.1 Hardware check
The purpose of this test is to check hardware components of the substation controller.
Hardware checklist
Sr. Qty Device

Description n/a remarks
No. (Nos) available
SICAM PAS Station Unit (FS)

2
1 Type ...................................
SICAM PAS Station Unit (GW)

2
2 Type ..............................................
Engineering Work Station (EWS)

3 1
Type ..................................
HMI Computer 2
4
Type ....................................
Ethernet Switches
5 Type..................................................
Ethernet Switch
6 Type ..................................................
........
Event List Printers
7 1
Type…………………..
Laser Color Printer

8 1
Type..............................
HMI 24”-LCD Flat Screen Monitors

9 4
Type ..................................
HMI 42”-LCD Flat Screen Monitor

10 1
Type ..................................

SIEMENS
GPS time receiver 2

11
Type………………..
Test scenario 1 : Hardware - Completeness check
Description:
 Completeness check according to above hardware checklist
Result:
 The hardware components of the substation controller are complete
Sr.
Description checked approved n/a remarks
No.
1 Hardware components check for the

PAS panels
Test scenario 2 : Hardware Installation & operational inspection
Description:
Sr.
No.
All equipment is free of
1 foreign materials (dust,
loose wires etc.)
All devices are mounted in
2 line with the GA (general
arrangement)
Labels & Markings on
3 front /rear /internal &
external of panels
Panel Dimensions, Colour
4 Selection, Locking System,
etc.
Visual inspection: Units
5 and individual devices are
fixed firmly & damage free
Visual inspection: Correct
6
wiring practices (RJ45, FO)
Proper earth ground shield
7
connections
Proper wiring in cable
8
troughs
Terminal blocks and MCB’s
9
are mounted properly
Top Fan connectivity &
10
operation check

SIEMENS
Panels lighting & door

11
switch operation check
Panels heater & thermostat
12
operation check
Front panel mounted
13
devices healthiness check
2.1.2 Redundant Substation Controller SICAM PAS Full server
Test scenario 4 : Hardware – Connectivity Check
Sr.
No.
1 Switch interconnection
Substation Controller &

GW connections as per
2 System Architecture to the
switch at correct port
designations
HMI connections as per
System Architecture to the
3
switches at correct port
designations
Engineering Work Station
connection as System
4
Architecture to the
switches at correct port
Connection of time GPS to
5 the substation automation
system
Connection of bay device
6
loops
Test scenario : 5 startup check
Description:
Test requirements:
The substation controllers are switched off.
The check is performed after startup of the substation controllers via a remote desktop connection
between a PC and the substation controllers (P11 / P21).
 The substation controllers are switched on

SIEMENS
Result:
 PAS starts on both FS (check with SICAM PAS Operation)
 One substation controller is the master (it is connected to the HMI)
 The other substation controller is the not connected to the HMI (it is the slave)
 Communication between FS master and PAS CC is carried out (open System Overview at
HMI and check the display of the communication links)
 Communication between the two substation controllers and the IEC61850 bay devices is
carried out (check with SICAM PAS Operation)
Sr.
No.
1 Startup check
Test scenario 5b : Faults on monitoring system start up-test
Description:
During the FAT it shall be checked, if the faults listed in the alarm list are plausible.
Note:
The followings are few typical alarms only.
Sr.
No. Alarm as per alarm list (typical alarms only)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

SIEMENS
Test scenario 6 : Redundancy test 1
Description:
Test requirements:
Undisturbed network between the IEC61850 bay devices and the redundant substation controllers
Bay devices and substation controllers operational

 Information is generated by test simulation at a bay device
Result:
 Identical information on both substation controllers (can be checked in PAS by using the
SICAM PAS Value Viewer)
Sr.
No.
1 Redundancy Test 1
Test scenario 7 : Redundancy test 2
Description:
Test requirements:
Connection to the HMI is established and one substation controller is the master.
 Switch off the master
Result:
 The slave becomes the master (check with SICAM PAS Operation)
 The HMI is connected to the new Master (check with SICAM PAS Operation)
Sr.
No.
1 Redundancy Test 2
Test scenario 8 : Teaming card function check
Description:
 The HMI computers are connected in a redundant way to the network. Either the respective
data flows via the first OR the second connection
 The loss of either the first or the second connection must not lead to loss of the HMI
connectivity. The loss of the HMI connectivity can be identified by the screen.

SIEMENS
Teaming function check HMI1

Sr.
No.
Verify that the HMI1 is not

1
affected.
Reconnect the first LAN

2 connection and verify that
HMI1 is still not affected
Remove the second LAN

connection of HMI1.
3
affected.
Reconnect the second LAN

Teaming function check HMI2

Sr.
No.
Remove the first LAN

connection of HMI2.
5
affected.
Reconnect the first LAN

Remove the second LAN

connection of HMI2.
7
affected.
Reconnect the second LAN

2.2 Communication
2.2.1 IEC 61850 Protocol
Following tests shall be executed to verify the functionality of communication interface for protocol
IEC 61850 of the substation controller.
Test requirements:
Communication cable plugged into switch ports.
Communication network undisturbed.

SIEMENS
Check the current state of data link with SICAM PAS UI - Operation.
Test scenario 1
Description:
 Remove two communication cable from the RSG switches for one switch
Result:
Blue arrows in SICAM PAS UI indicate the active interface and the broken link to the system
Sr.
No.
1 Switch communications broken
Test scenario 2
Description:
 Establish the disconnected loop again by plugging in the removed cables
Result:
Green arrow in SICAM PAS UI indicates the active interface and the link to the system has been
established
Sr.
No.
1 Switch communications restored
2.2.2 RuggedCom Switch RSG 2100 with IEC 61850 Communication Protocol
The purpose of this test is to verify error-free communication between the switches and the devices
of the substation automation system via the IEC 61850 protocol
Test requirements:
Communication cable plugged into switch ports
Communication network undisturbed
Test scenario 1
Description:
 Remove and plug in the communication cables of one of the RSG2100 switches. Do this port
wise (one port after the other to disconnect and then to reconnect)
Result:
 Disconnected port is indicated in the HMI (list or picture)

SIEMENS
Sr.
No.
1 Switch communications HMI

indications check
Test scenario 2
Description:
 Remove one end of an existing Control loop fiber optic connection at the RSG2100 switch
 Verify that the affected RSG2100 Ethernet port is announced as faulty in the HMI and
that all other devices within the loop are not affected and remain undisturbed and in service
even if the network is being reconfigured
 After some 10 seconds reconnect the FO cable and verify if all devices keep undisturbed in
service
 Repeat the tests above for all protection & control loops
Sr.
System Loop checked approved n/a remarks
No.
1 380 kV Control Loop
2 230 kV Control Loop

SIEMENS
2.2.3 Checking LED of Rugged COM ports and accessing the switches
Switch Name: ________________
Port Number USED LED REMARK

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Accessing to the switch …………………..
Note: The above table can be used for different switches separately and shall be enclosed along
with test protocol during testing.

SIEMENS
2.3 Special Functions

2.3.1 Time Synchronization with Redundant GPS Timer Server as Master Clock
The purpose of this test is to verify time synchronization of the substation controller and connected
peripherals (HMI, bay devices).
The following tests are very time consuming since the SAS databases time synchronization
needs a certain time due to its size and complexness.
It shall be decided during the FAT, if all tests shall be done. The target of achieving the SAS
FAT certificate shall not be affected by the decision.
Test requirements:
The substation controller receives a valid GPS time signal from one of the redundant GPS Time
Servers (GPS receiver 1, GPS receiver 2).
Test scenario 1 :
Description:
 Manually setting (change) of the time of the substation controller (e.g. in a console window
using the TIME command)
Result:
 After some time, the substation controller has obtained the current time again from the GPS
 The connected peripherals have the right time, too
Sr.
No.
1 GPS Synchronizing
Test scenario 2 :
Description:
 Manually setting (change) of the time at HMI PC (e.g. in a console window using the TIME
command)
Result:
 After some time, the HMI PC has obtained the current time again from the GPS
Sr.
No.
1 Time Synchronizing in HMI

SIEMENS
Test scenario 3
Description:
Perform the test for connected typical BCUs (if in service)
 Switch off bay device

 Switch on bay device (invalid time in the bay device)
 After some time, simulate indications at the bay device
Result:
 After some time, the bay device has obtained the current time of the time master
 TIME FAULTY indication at bay device is set to OFF
 Indications have a valid time stamp
Sr.
No.
1 Time Synchronizing in BCU
Test scenario 4
Description:
The purpose of the following tests is to verify the redundancy of the time synchronization.
Test requirements:
The substation automation system is time synchronized by GPS receiver 1.
The System Overview picture is displayed at the HMI.

 Power off GPS receiver 1
Result:
 At the system overview picture GPS receiver 1 is indicated as faulty
 GPS receiver 2 synchronizes the time at the substation automation system
Sr.
No.
1 GPS redundancy

SIEMENS
Test scenario 5
Description:
 Power on GPS receiver 1
Result:
 At the system overview picture GPS receiver 1 is indicated as connected
Sr.
No.
1 GPS receiver 2 on & 1 off
Test scenario 6
Description:
 Power off GPS receiver 2
Result:
 At the system overview picture GPS receiver 2 is indicated as faulty
Sr.
No.
1 GPS receiver 1 on & 2 off
Test scenario 7
Description:
 Power on GPS receiver 2
Result:
 At the system overview picture GPS receiver 2 is indicated as connected
Indications have a valid time stamp
Sr.
No.
1 GPS receiver 2 on

SIEMENS
Test scenario 8
Description:
 Disconnect antenna from GPS receiver 1
Result:
Indications have a valid time stamp
Sr.
No.
1 GPS receiver 1 cable plug out
Test scenario 9
Description:
 Connect antenna to GPS receiver 1
Result:
Sr.
No.
1 GPS receiver 1 cable plug-in
Test scenario 10
Description:
 Disconnect antenna from GPS receiver 2
Result:
Sr.
No.
1 GPS receiver 2 cable plug-out
Test scenario 11
Description
 Connect antenna to GPS receiver 2

SIEMENS
Result:
Sr.
No.
1 GPS receiver 2 cable plug-in
2.4 Monitoring
2.4.1 Acoustic Horn Activation via Binary Contact
The purpose of this test is to check the horn function. Several alarm indications are randomly
simulated for this purpose.
Test scenario 1
Description:
 The indication is simulated
Result:
 The audible horn sounds (or respective contact closes)
Sr.
No.
1 Alarm Horn ON simulation
Test scenario 2
Description:
 The horn is acknowledged via the ACKNOWLEDGE button in the HMI
Result:
 The horn stops (or respective contact opened)
Sr.
No.
1 Alarm Horn ON Acknowledge

SIEMENS
3 Bay Level
3.1 Communication of the Bay Devices to the Station Level via the IEC
61850 Protocol
3.1.1 Optical connection
The purpose of this test is to verify error-free communication between bay devices and substation
controller via the IEC 61850 protocol. In addition to the above, a bit test is performed; this means
that proper acquisition of the information at the bay device is verified.
Test requirements: FO network fault-free.
COMMUNICATION FAULT CLEARED of devices involved.
Test scenario 1
Description:
 Switch off one bay device
Result:
 Uninvolved bay devices are error-free
 Status change from TOPICAL to NOT TOPICAL
Sr.
Feeder checked approved n/a remarks
No.
1 380kV Line
2 380/230kV/13.8kV Transformer
Test scenario 2
Description:
 Switch on bay devices
Result:
 COMMUNICATION FAULT CLEARED
 Status change from NOT TOPICAL to TOPICAL
Sr.
No.
1 380kV Line

SIEMENS
Sr.
No.
Test scenario 3
Description:
 Pull the FO cable of the bay device in the optical ring
Result:
 Indication FAILURE EN100 CHANNEL 1 or FAILURE EN100 CHANNEL 2 RAISED of the
bay device at the destination (HMI)
 Indication FAILURE EN100 CHANNEL 1 or FAILURE EN100 CHANNEL 2 RAISED of the
adjacent bay device at the destinations
Sr.
No.
1 380kV Line
Test scenario 4
Description:
 Plug in the FO cable
Result:
 Indication FAILURE EN100 CHANNEL 1 or FAILURE EN100 CHANNEL 2 CLEARED of the
bay device at the destinations (HMI)
 Indication FAILURE EN100 CHANNEL 1 or FAILURE EN100 CHANNEL 2 CLEARED of the
adjacent bay device at the destinations (e.g. bay device, HMI)
Sr.
No.
1 380kV Line

SIEMENS
Test scenario 5
Description:
 One or two Indications are simulated either by the DIGSI function for simulating indications
and/or during the process
Result:
 The indications are displayed at the different destinations (e.g. bay device, HMI) as defined
by the parameter list
Sr.
No.
1 380kV Line
Test scenario 6
Description:
Test requirements:
Interlocking conditions satisfied.
 One Commands is sent to the bay devices from the HMI, and the corresponding feedback is
simulated
Result:
 The commands are output at the corresponding bay devices and switching devices and
logged correctly as defined by the parameter list
Sr.
No.
1 380kV Line
Test scenario 7
Description:
 One Measured values is simulated

SIEMENS
Result:
 The measured values are displayed at the different destinations (e.g. bay device, HMI) as
defined by the parameter list
Sr.
No.
1 380kV Line
3.2 Special Functions

3.2.1 Time synchronization via SNTP
The purpose of this test is to verify time synchronization of the bay devices.
Test requirements:
The time server sends a valid time signal.
Test scenario 1
Description:
Perform the test for some bay devices.

 Switch off bay device
 Switch on bay device (invalid time in the bay device)
Result:
 After some time, the bay device has obtained the current time of the time server
 TIME FAULTY indication at bay device is set to OFF
Sr.
No.
1 380kV Line
3.3 Monitoring
3.3.1 Indication Transmission via IEC 61850 Protocol at the HMI
The purpose of this test is to verify the transmission of indications from the bay device to the
destination (HMI). All indications of the bay device are checked according to parameter list.
Test scenario 1
Description:

SIEMENS
 All indications are triggered
Result:
 The indications are transmitted properly (e.g. indication type, value, state) to the destination
Sr.
No.
1 380kV Line
3.3.2 Indication Display at the Bay Device with Graphic Display
The purpose of this test is to verify whether the pictures are properly presented on the display of
the bay device.
Test scenario 1
Description:
 The representation of text, switching devices, measured values and indications is checked
Result:
 The display shows correct representation of text, switching devices, measured value and
indications.
Sr.
No.
1 380kV Line
Test scenario 2
Description:
The purpose of this test is to verify the correct functionality of the function keys.
 Check the correct functionality of the function keys.
F1 : Event log
F2 : Measured value list
F3 :
F4 :
Result:
 The function key configuration is operable.

SIEMENS
Sr.
No.
1 380kV Line
3.3.3 Optical Indication Display at the Bay Device with LEDs
The purpose of this test is to verify whether signaling of messages using LEDs works properly.
Perform this test for all messages that shall be signaled using LED.
LED display unlatched
Test scenario 1
Description:
 Indications routed to LEDs are simulated as RAISED
Result:
 The corresponding LEDs light up
Sr.
No.
1 380kV Line
Test scenario 2
Description:
 Indications routed to LEDs are simulated as CLEARED
Result:
 The corresponding LEDs are off
Sr.
No.
1 380kV Line

SIEMENS
3.4 Control
3.4.1 Commands processing with the IEC 61850 Protocol
The purpose of this test is to verify command execution by the HMI to the bay device and recording
in the event log of the bay device. All commands of the bay device are checked according to
parameter list.
Test requirements:
 The switching authority at bay level is REMOTE
 The operator is authorized to control the switching devices
 The interlocking conditions for the switching devices to be controlled are satisfied
 The switching authority at station level is LOCAL for command initiation from HMI
Test scenario 1
Description:
 Command is sent from HMI
 In case of commands with feedback, the feedback is to be simulated at the bay device within
the feedback monitoring time
Result:
 The commands are output
 Logging of the command output in the event log of the bay device (B+, CO+ and in case of
commands with feedback FB+)
Sr.
No.
1 380kV Line
3.4.2 Changing the Switching Authority (LOCAL/REMOTE) at the Bay Device with
the Key Switch
The purpose of this test is to verify the switching authority check at the bay device during command
output initiated from the front panel of the device.
Test requirements:
The interlocking conditions are satisfied.
Test scenario 1
Description:
 The key switch LOCAL/REMOTE is set to LOCAL

SIEMENS
 Command output at the bay device is started
Result:
Sr.
No.
1 380kV Line
Test scenario 2
Description:
 The key switch LOCAL/REMOTE at the bay device is set to REMOTE
 Command output at the bay device is started (initiated from the fron panel of the device)
Result:
 The commands are not output
Sr.
No.
1 380kV Line
3.4.3 Control at the Bay Device with Graphic Display
The purpose of this test is to verify the switchgear control function and proper configuration of the
command outputs at the bay device according to parameter lists. Perform this test for all switching
devices of the bay device.
Test requirements:
The key switch is set to LOCAL
Test scenario 1
Description:
 Open the control picture using the CTRL key
 Select the switching device by using the navigation keys
 Select switching direction ON by using the I key
 Control the switching device by using the ENTER key
 Feedback simulation
Result:

SIEMENS
 Switching devices flashes in specified position ON

 The command is output
 Feedback is simulated and the switching device is represented as being ON
 The command is logged in the event log
Sr.
No.
1 380kV Line
Test scenario 2
Description:
 Open the control picture using the CTRL key
 Select the switching device by using the navigation keys
 Select switching direction OFF by using the “O” key
 Control the switching device by using the ENTER key
 Feedback simulation
Result:
 Switching devices flashes in specified position OFF
 The command is output
 Feedback is simulated and the switching device is represented as being OFF
 The command is logged in the event log
Sr.
No.
1 380kV Line
3.4.4 Bay and Substation Interlocking on Bay Level
The purpose of this test is to verify the bay-specific interlocking check at the bay device during
command output.
Test requirements:
The key switch LOCAL/REMOTE is set to LOCAL.
The key switch INTERLOCKING OFF/NORMAL is set to NORMAL.
Following switching operation will be randomly checked:

SIEMENS
Test scenario 1
Description:
 The interlocking conditions are not satisfied
Result:
Sr.
No.
1 380kV Line
Test scenario 2
Description:
 The interlocking conditions are satisfied
Result:
Sr.
No.
1 380kV Line
Test scenario 3
Description:
Test requirements:
The key switch LOCAL/REMOTE is set to REMOTE.
Switching authority at HMI is LOCAL.
The operator is authorized to control the switching devices.

 Command output at HMI is started
Result:
 The commands are not output and logged in the HMI event list (command, command-)

SIEMENS
Sr.
No.
1 380kV Line
Test scenario 4
Description:
 Command output at HMI is started
Result:
 The commands are output and logged in the event list (command, command+, feedback,
command execution end +)
Sr.
No.
1 380kV Line
Test scenario 5
Description:
Test requirements:
The key switch LOCAL/REMOTE is set to REMOTE.
Switching authority at HMI is REMOTE.

 Command output at Control Center is started
Result:
Sr.
No.
1 380kV Line

SIEMENS
Sr.
No.
Test scenario 6
Description:
 Command output at Control Center is started
Result:
Sr.
No.
1 380kV Line
3.5 Measurement
3.5.1 Measurement Acquisition with Direct Connection to CT/VT
The purpose of this test is to check the acquisition of the measured values in the bay device and to
verify the transmission of measured values from the bay device to the destinations (e.g. HMI). The
measured values of the bay device are checked according to parameter list.
Test requirements:
The nominal values for all measured values are input at the bay device.
Test scenario 1
Description:
 The 100% value of the measured values is fed in
Result:
 The measured values are properly displayed at the destinations (e.g. bay device display)
Sr.
No.
1 380kV Line
Test scenario 2
Description:

SIEMENS
 The 50% value of the measured values is fed in
Result:
 The measured values are properly displayed at the destinations (e.g. bay device display)
Sr.
No.
1 380kV Line
3.6 Verification of the time between changing of an binary input (BCU) and
the related changes in HMI / BCU
3.6.1 Binary input status to HMI
 For this test a signal is programmed in a source BCU (Binary Input “A”) and transmitted to
the HMI.
 The time in between initiating the signal (see time tag of the BI of BCU “A”) and
Sr. Time
Signal origin / destination Time Tag difference Approved
No. in [ms
1 BCU Binary Input “A”
2 HMI1
3.6.2 Goose message running through time
The Goose message transport time itself cannot be measured on premises of panel manufacturer.
Instead a Goose message shall
 be implemented in BCU “A” and be transmitted to BCU “B”. The source signal shall be
assigned to any available binary input of the BCU “A”
 In BCU “B” (receiving device) the Goose message received shall be assigned to an internal
indication
 The time in between initiating the signal (see time tag of the BI of BCU “A”) and triggered
internal indication at BCU “B” (see time tag of internal indication at BCU “B”) is roughly the
entire running through.
Sr. Time
No. in [ms
1 BCU Binary Input “A”

SIEMENS
Sr. Time
No. in [ms
2 BCU “B” internal Indication
4 HMI
4.1 System Configuration
4.1.1 HMI Configuration – Redundant Servers used as Two-Station System
The purpose of this test is to check hardware and software and proper startup of the HMI
components.
Test scenario 1
Description:
Test requirements:
The substation controller is switched on and ready for use, the HMI Servers are switched off.
 The HMI Servers are started
Result:
 The operating system starts on the HMI Servers
 PAS CC starts on the HMI Servers, the start screen comes up
 Communication between substation controller and PAS CC of both HMI Servers is carried
out

1 PAS CC & HMI

communication
Test scenario 2
Description:
 Checking the pictures and of HMI Servers for consistency
Result:
 The pictures and on both HMI Servers are identical
1 HMI servers picture

SIEMENS
status
Test scenario 3
Description:
 Deactivate HMI Server 1
 Simulate indications after HMI Server 1 is deactivated
 Start command execution at HMI Server 2
Result:
 Indication HMI Server 1 FAILURE ON simulated indications in pictures of the HMI Server 2
 HMI Server 2 undisturbed
 Commands are executed (Precondition: operation and interlocking conditions are fulfilled)
1 HMI 1 OFF & HMI 2

healthy
Test scenario 4
Description:
 Activate HMI Server 1
Result:
 Indication HMI Server 1 FAILURE OFF in pictures of the HMI Server 2
 The pictures are identical on both HMI servers
 changed process image is displayed at HMI Server 1
1 HMI 1 start & HMI 2

healthy
Test scenario 5
Description:
 Deactivate HMI Server 2
 Simulate indications after HMI Server 2 is deactivated

SIEMENS
 Start command execution at HMI Server 1
Result:
 Indication HMI Server 2 FAILURE ON simulated in pictures of the HMI Server 1
 Commands are executed (Precondition: operation and interlocking conditions are fulfilled)
1 HMI 2 OFF & HMI 1

healthy
Test scenario 6
Description:
 Activate HMI Server 2
Result:
 Indication HMI Server 2 FAILURE OFF simulated in pictures of the HMI Server 1
 The pictures are identical on both HMI servers
 Changed process image is displayed at HMI Server 2 (lists and pictures)
1 HMI 2 start & HMI 1

healthy
4.2 Operator Control and Monitoring – Display Structure and Navigation

4.2.1 Operating Concept with SICAM PAS CC
The purpose of this test is to verify the implementation of the operating concept such as start
picture, display composition and navigation between the different views.
Test scenario 1
Description:
 The operating concept is checked. To do so, different views are accessed by using the
navigation buttons
Result:
 The different views have been accessed by using navigation buttons and found O.K.

SIEMENS
1 Different view check
4.2.2 Status Bar
The purpose of this test is to check the function and the representation of the status bar for
completeness.
The status bar will be checked for layout, and naming in line with customer requirements. The
functionality of the buttons and objects in the status bar is checked and the general look and feel
will be verified.
Test requirements:
The operator is authorized to execute the operations.
Test scenario
Description:
The display of the status bar is checked, the following buttons are working properly
Sr.
Status bar checked approved n/a remarks
No.
1 LOGIN
SWITCHING
2
AUTHORITY
3 STATION OVERVIEW
4 SYSTEM OVERVIEW
5 TRAFO OVERVIEW
6 ALARM LIST
7 SOE LIST
8 EVENT LIST
9 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
10 PRINT HARD COPY
11 HORN
4.2.3 Login and Logout with SICAM PAS CC
Test scenario 1
Description:
 No User is logged on

SIEMENS
 Operations that require authorization are executed
Result:
 Unauthorized operations are blocked

1 Unauthorized
operations block
Test scenario 2
Description:
 Press button Login on the status bar
 Enter the password and confirm with OK after opening the Login dialogue
Result:
 The current user is displayed in the status bar
 The login results in an entry into the Event list
Login time and user name are also logged
1 Authorized
operations check
Test scenario 3
Description:
 An user is logged on
 Operations that require authorization are executed
Result:
 Operations for which the user has authorizations are not blocked.
1 User login
Test scenario 4
Description:

SIEMENS
 No operation is carried out during the time of automatic logout
Result:
 Operator is logged out
 No user is displayed in the status bar, the logout results in an entry into the Event list

1 User logout
Test scenario 5
Description:
 Press button Login on the status bar
 Press Logout button after opening the dialogue
Result:
 Operator is logged out
 No user is displayed in the status bar, the logout results in an entry into the Event list
1 User logout
4.2.4 User Administration with SICAM PAS CC
The User Administration Function describes the certain levels of the authority of a User.
During the FAT it shall be agreed which levels of Authorities shall be available.
The following levels (categories) can be an example and be applicable for the SAS.
a) Supervision category.
b) Control category
c) Configuration category
d) Administrator category
Test requirements:
The user is not authorized to use the function User Administration (e.g. user Operator)

SIEMENS
Test scenario 1
Description:
 For verification of the access limitation by the user rights, login as a user for Supervision
category. Try to do the following actions:
a) Change between different pictures in the HMI project
b) Send a command to a switching device
c) Open RECPRO to view the fault records
d) Shut down the PAS CC Runtime
Result:
 a) OK
b) Not possible
c) Not possible
d) Not possible
1 Supervision user
login
Test scenario 2
Description:
 For verification of the access limitation by the user rights, login as a user for Control
Result:
 a) OK
b) OK
c) Not possible
d) Not possible
1 Control user login

SIEMENS
Test scenario 3
Description:
 For verification of the access limitation by the user rights, login as a user for Configuration
Result:
 a) OK
b) OK
c) OK
d) Not possible
1 Configuration user
login
Test scenario 4
Description:
 For verification of the access limitation by the user rights, login as a user for Administrator
Result:
 a) OK
b) OK
c) OK
d) OK
1 Administrator user
login

SIEMENS
4.2.5 Displays
4.2.5.1 System Overview
The purpose of this test is to check the representation of the system overview picture for
completeness.
Test scenario 1
Description:
 Check the devices on the system overview
Result:
 The devices on the system overview are complete and named correctly
1 System overview
Representation check
Test scenario 2
Description:
 Check the communication connections
Result:
 The display of the communication connections is shown correctly.
1 System overview
communication
check
Test scenario 3
Description:
 Remove a network connection (i.e. between two switches) to check the coloring and
behavior of the dynamized lines
Result:
 The coloring and behaviors of the dynamized lines are correctly shown.
SLD colour change test:
1 Feeder not
energized

SIEMENS
2 Feeder energised
3 Feeder Earthed
4.2.5.2 Bay Representation in the Detail Display
The purpose of this test is to check the representation of detail pictures for completeness.
The detailed displays (by typical) will be checked for layout, and naming in line with customer
requirements. The general look and feel will be verified.
Verify in each typical detail picture that the bay corresponds with the single line diagram.
Typical to check:
 380kV Line
 380/230/13.8 kV Transformer
Test scenario 1
Description:
 Check naming of the switching devices and buttons
 Check shape of the switching objects
 Check colouring of the lines
 Check display of measurements and all other relevant information
 Check display of the respective bus section
Result:
 The naming, shape, coloring, measurement & bus section display are found correct.
1 Bay
representations
4.2.5.3 Help Picture
The purpose of this test is to check the representation of the help picture for completeness.
Verify that shown switching devices are in line with previous pictures, all states of switching devices
as well as the line colours are described correctly.
Links on further help files and documentations (like PAS CC documentation etc.) are given.
Test scenario 1
Description:

SIEMENS
 The display of the help picture is checked
Result:
 The display of the help picture is correct
1 SLD element help

pictures
4.2.6 Indication List

4.2.6.1 Event List
The purpose of this test is to check the names of the columns and colours in the event list.
Test scenario 1
Description:
 Verify that all required columns are listed and available in the event list
By default all incoming signals will appear in the event list.
1. Events Only (Events that are not configured as alarms)

Background Colour: (white)....................................................
Font Colour: (black)...................................................
2. Event – Alarms (Events that are also configured as Alarms)

Incoming Alarms
Background Colour: (red).............................................
Font Colour: (black)..........................................
Disappearing ACK Alarms
Background Colour: (yellow)...........................................
Font Colour: (black)............................................
1 Event List
discription
Test scenario 2
Description:
 Simulate an event (e.g. Circuit Breaker OPEN/CLOSED)
Result:

SIEMENS
The event is logged with the properties of the Events Only (it is NOTdisplayed in the Alarm list)
1 Event simulation
4.2.6.2 Alarm list function
The purpose of this test is to check the names of the columns and colours in the alarm list.
Test scenario 1
Description:
 Verify that all required columns are listed and available in the alarm list
The behavioural patterns together with the colour designations assigned will be verified as per the
customer’s requirement.
 Incoming Alarms
Background colour: (red)....................................................
Font colour: (black).................................................
 Persistent ACK Alarms

Background colour: (yellow)............................................
Font colour: (black)............................................
 Disappearing UnACK Alarms
Background colour: (green).............................................
Font colour: (black).............................................
 Disappearing ACK Alarms
Alarm disappears
A step by step approach is used to verify the above possibilities.
1 Alarm Messages
Test scenario 2
Description:
 Simulate a persistent alarm
Result:
 The alarm is logged with the properties of the Incoming Alarm

SIEMENS
1 Incoming alarm
check
Test scenario 3
Description:
 Acknowledge the persistent alarm
Result:
 The alarm is logged with the properties of the Persistent ACK Alarm
1 Alarm
Acknowledgement
Test scenario 4
Description:
 Simulate an alarm reset (cleared) from the source and acknowledge it
Result:
The alarm disappears
1 Alarm Reset
Test scenario 5
Description:
 Simulate an alarm and immediately reset the alarm from the source
Result:
 The alarm is logged with the properties of the Disappearing UnACK Alarm
1 Alarm Cleared
Test scenario 6
Description:
 Acknowledge the disappearing UnACK alarm
Result:
 The alarm disappears

SIEMENS
1 Alarm UnACK
4.2.7 Printing
4.2.7.1 Message Logging with Line Printer
The purpose of this test is to verify functioning of the line printer.
Test scenario 1
Description:
 Simulation of messages, printer is ready and online
Result:
 Messages are printed promptly in the required layout
1 Message Logging
4.2.7.2 Hardcopy
The purpose of this test is to verify functioning of the Hardcopy printer.
Test scenario 1
Description:
 Press the HARDCOPY button
Result:
 Hardcopy is printed correctly
1 Hardcopy printer
Test scenario 2
Description:
 Open event list an click button “Printing” at event event list
Result:

SIEMENS
1 Event printing
Test scenario 3
Description:
 Open alarm list an click button “Printing” at alarm list
Result:
1 Alarm printing
4.2.8 PRP Function

4.2.8.1 Testing PRP Function
Test scenario 1
Result:
 PRP Function is working
1 PRP Function

SIEMENS
5 Telecontrol Protocol
5.1 Control Center Connection with the Telecontrol Protocol IEC-60870-5-

101 (Slave)
The purpose of this test is to verify the principal functionality of telecontrol connection IEC 60870-5-
101 (slave) and furture IEC 60870-5-104 (slave). One Indication and one command shall be
configured for the test.
Perform this test for all control centers.
Test requirements:
The control center simulation is ready to operate. The message exchange between the substation
controller and control center is monitored by the simulation software (IECTEST 101 & 104 and/or
FINK 101 & 104).
Test scenario 1
Description:
 The communication link between the substation controller and the simulated control center is
set up and checked
Result:
 After the maximum startup monitoring time, the TI 70 end-of-initialization is displayed in the
simulation
 Data traffic is present (one indication is suffitient for principal test)
 Indication COMMUNICATION FAILURE CLEARED at the destinations (e.g. HMI)
Sr.
GW Channel checked approved n/a remarks
No.
SAS PSC S/S

1
GW 1 – IEC101 Channel 1
SAS PSC S/S

2
SAS PSC S/S

3
GW – IEC104 Channel 3
SAS PSC S/S

4
SAS PSC S/S

5

SIEMENS
Test scenario 2
Description:
 The control center generates organizational commands (e.g. GI)
Result:
 The corresponding action is executed and checked by using simulation software
Sr.
No.
SAS PSC S/S

1
SAS PSC S/S

2
SAS PSC S/S

3
SAS PSC S/S

4
SAS PSC S/S

5
Test scenario 3
Description:
 One Information is generated in the bay level or station level
Result:
The indication is transmitted with the correct type identification (TI), the correct value and the
correct quality code and checked by using simulation software.
Sr.
No.
SAS PSC S/S

1
SAS PSC S/S

2
SAS PSC S/S

3
SAS PSC S/S

4
SAS PSC S/S

5

SIEMENS
Test scenario 4
Description:
Test requirements:

 The control center generates commands and checks them by using simulation software
Result:
The command is executed
Sr.
No.
SAS PSC S/S

1
SAS PSC S/S

2
SAS PSC S/S

3
SAS PSC S/S

4
SAS PSC S/S

5


FTP - SAS Protocol - SADARAH

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

FTP - SAS Protocol - SADARAH

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

FACTORY TEST ITP No.

SAUDI ELECTRICITY COMPANY

CONSTRUCTION OF SADARAH 380/230kV BSP IN JIC-2

FACTORY TEST PROCEDURE

SUBSTATION AUTOMATION SYSTEM

15-2-2012 FAT Procedure SAS (Rev. 0) Page 1 / 50

CONSTRUCTION OF SADARAH 380/230kV

3 SIEMENS Contract No. : WBS # 79OP-00086.P

4 Name of Manufacturer : SIEMENS LTD.,

: ARABIA ELECTRIC LTD. (E)

6 Contact person : Mr. MUHAMMAD IQBAL

: Tel No. (02) 661 9931

15-2-2012 FAT Procedure SAS (Rev. 0) Page 2 / 50

1.1 The purpose of this document............................................................................................ 5

2.1 System Configuration.......................................................................................................... 6

2.3 Special Functions............................................................................................................... 15

15-2-2012 FAT Procedure SAS (Rev. 0) Page 3 / 50

3.2 Special Functions............................................................................................................... 23

3.4.3 Control at the Bay Device with Graphic Display............................................................27

3.6 Timing Test.......................................................................................................................... 31

4.1 System Configuration........................................................................................................ 33

4.2 Operator Control and Monitoring – Display Structure and Navigation..........................35

15-2-2012 FAT Procedure SAS (Rev. 0) Page 4 / 50

1.1 The purpose of this document

15-2-2012 FAT Procedure SAS (Rev. 0) Page 5 / 50

Sr.No. Description checked approved n/a remarks

1 Equipment List check

2.1 System Configuration

Sr. Qty Device

SICAM PAS Station Unit (FS)

SICAM PAS Station Unit (GW)

Engineering Work Station (EWS)

Laser Color Printer

HMI 24”-LCD Flat Screen Monitors

HMI 42”-LCD Flat Screen Monitor

15-2-2012 FAT Procedure SAS (Rev. 0) Page 6 / 50

GPS time receiver 2

Test scenario 1 : Hardware - Completeness check

1 Hardware components check for the

Test scenario 2 : Hardware Installation & operational inspection

15-2-2012 FAT Procedure SAS (Rev. 0) Page 7 / 50

Panels lighting & door

2.1.2 Redundant Substation Controller SICAM PAS Full server

Test scenario 4 : Hardware – Connectivity Check

Substation Controller &

Test scenario : 5 startup check

The substation controllers are switched off.

 The substation controllers are switched on

15-2-2012 FAT Procedure SAS (Rev. 0) Page 8 / 50

Test scenario 5b : Faults on monitoring system start up-test

15-2-2012 FAT Procedure SAS (Rev. 0) Page 9 / 50

Test scenario 6 : Redundancy test 1

Bay devices and substation controllers operational

Test scenario 7 : Redundancy test 2

Test scenario 8 : Teaming card function check

15-2-2012 FAT Procedure SAS (Rev. 0) Page 10 / 50

Teaming function check HMI1

Verify that the HMI1 is not

Reconnect the first LAN

Remove the second LAN

Reconnect the second LAN

Teaming function check HMI2

Remove the first LAN