Grading by me, Location based

1) The Best Category

10 – Perfect

The Best Category Description

RARE, THE BEST (9) This category is:
(All components should be applied) - Very happy people
E.g. - One style only: Gothic,
Very happy people living in a colourful Rococo, Baroque, no
place with old medieval Tudor brutalist buildings
architecture, very close to the mountain - Very Organised
resorts and lakes. infrastructure
- Nature is protected,
very green country with
mountains, low pollution
- The country has a
mixture of different
architectures
- Very Clean
- Very symmetrical
- It is very exciting and
adorable
- It is innovative, details
always exist
- Very aesthetic

This category is:

- One style only: Gothic,
Rococo, Baroque, but
brutalist buildings are
further
- Very Organised
infrastructure
- Nature is protected,
very green country with
 VERY GOOD (8) mountains, low pollution
(All components should be applied) - The country has a
E.g. mixture of different
-Colourful medieval towns of Limburg, architectures
Germany and Colmar, France. - Very Clean
- Mountain resorts in Switzerland and - Very symmetrical
Austria - It is very exciting and
E.g. Colmar, France adorable
- It is innovative, details
always exist
- Very aesthetic

E.g. Limburg, Germany

E.g. Grindelwald, Switzerland

E.g. Paltinis, Sibiu

E.g. Lenz, Austria

 GOOD (7) This category is:
(All components should be applied) - One style only: Gothic,
E.g. Rococo, Baroque, but
France, Italy, , Sighisoara, Sibiu, Budapest, brutalist buildings are
Prague, Luxemburg, Liechtenstein, further
Andorra, Slovenia, - Organised
infrastructure
- Nature is protected,
very green country, low
E.g. Andorra la Vela, Andorra pollution
- The country has a
mixture of different
architectures
- Clean
- symmetrical
- It is sometimes exiting,
boring adorable and
depressive
- It is innovative, details
exist to a certain extent
- There is a lot for more
improvement.

E.g. Prague, Czech Republic

 E.g. Budapest, Hungary

E.g. Sighisoara, Transylvania

E.g. Milan, Italy

E.g. Sibiu, Transylvania

E.g. Edinburgh, Scotland

E.g. Bath, England

E.g. Paris, France

E.g. Madrid, Spain

E.g. Athens, Greece

 2) The Neutral Category:
The Neutral Category
NEUTRAL (6)
(All components should be applied)
E.g. Germany, Moscow, Sweden,
Norway, Finland
E.g. Stockholm, Sweden
E.g. Moscow, Russia
E.g. Berlin, Germany
Description
This category is:
- A mixture of brick, rococo,
baroque and brutalist
buildings
- Organised infrastructure
- Nature is protected, very
green country, low pollution
- The country has a mixture
of different architectures
- Clean
- symmetrical
- It is sometimes exiting,
boring adorable and
depressive
- It is innovative, details exist
to a certain extent
- There is a lot for more
improvement.
OKAY (5)
(Some components are enough to be
part of this list)
E.g.
Netherlands, England, Ireland,
Belgium
E.g. Cork, Ireland
E.g. Antwerp, Belgium
E.g. Amsterdam, Netherlands
This category is:
- Many beautiful brick
buildings
- Organised infrastructure
- Nature is protected, very
green country, low pollution
- It fallows limited repetitive
ideologies.
- Clean
- symmetrical
- It is quite boring and
depressive
- It is innovative, but details
are still ignored.
- There is a lot for more
improvement.
 E.g. London, England
NOT REALLY (4)
(All components should be completed
to be part of this list)
E.g.
United States, Canada, Australia,
Iceland, Japan,
E.g. Quebec, Canada
E.g. Tokyo, Japan
This category is:
- Many beautiful brutalist
buildings
- Organised infrastructure
- Nature is protected
- It fallows limited repetitive
ideologies.
- Clean
- very unsymmetrical
- It is quite boring and
depressive
- It is innovative, but details
are still ignored.
- There is a lot for more
improvement.
 E.g. Reykjavík, Iceland

E.g. Birmingham, England

E.g. Hobart, Australia

 E.g. Nashville, United States

E.g. Dubai, United Arab Emirates

 3) The Bad Category:
The Bad Category
QUITE BAD (3)
(a little bit aesthetic)
E.g.
Philippines, Bucharest, Egypt, China,
Turkey, Peru, Brazil, Vietnam, South
Korea
E.g. Istanbul, Turkey
E.g. Bucharest, Romania
Description
This category is more often
used, there is a lot for
improvement. The negative
and positive aspects are
combined.
- Many brutalist buildings
- Somehow unorganised
- Nature is protected
- dilapidated architecture
- it fallows limited repetitive
ideologies.
- very unclean
- very unsymmetrical
- It is quite boring and
depressive
- It is not innovative at all.
- There is a lot for more
improvement.
 E.g. Manila, Philippines
VERY BAD (2)
(Many negative values)
E.g.
India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria,
South Africa (Because their culture is
very good, but the country is not very
aesthetic)
E.g Johannesburg, South Africa
This category is somewhat
rare, it has few negative
aspects.
- Dilapidated architecture
- Many brutalist buildings
- Very unorganised
- It fallows limited repetitive
ideologies.
- very unclean
- very unsymmetrical
- It is quite boring and
depressive
- It is not innovative at all.
- There is a lot for more
improvement.
 E.g. Lagos, Nigeria

E.g. Dhaka, Bangladeshi

This category is very rare, it

should be only applied when all
THE WORST (1) negative aspects are combined.
(All negative aspects combined)