Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Evaluation Form

    Uploaded by

    Cuteko Walalng
    11 views1 page
    This document contains an evaluation form for members of a research group. It evaluates members on three criteria: demonstrating a cooperative attitude, contributing significantly to the research success, and attending group meetings. Each criterion is scored out of 10, with the total score out of 30. Five members are listed with their scores in each category and total. The comments section notes that some members were responsive but did not know how to contribute since they did not attend discussions or do research, and that a questionnaire was provided for surveys but only one member consistently responded.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document contains an evaluation form for members of a research group. It evaluates members on three criteria: demonstrating a cooperative attitude, contributing significantly to the research success, and attending group meetings. Each criterion is scored out of 10, with the total score out of 30. Five members are listed with their scores in each category and total. The comments section notes that some members were responsive but did not know how to contribute since they did not attend discussions or do research, and that a questionnaire was provided for surveys but only one member consistently responded.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    11 views1 page

    Evaluation Form

    Uploaded by

    Cuteko Walalng
    This document contains an evaluation form for members of a research group. It evaluates members on three criteria: demonstrating a cooperative attitude, contributing significantly to the research success, and attending group meetings. Each criterion is scored out of 10, with the total score out of 30. Five members are listed with their scores in each category and total. The comments section notes that some members were responsive but did not know how to contribute since they did not attend discussions or do research, and that a questionnaire was provided for surveys but only one member consistently responded.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    EVALUATION FORM

    Contributes
    Attends group
    significantly to the
    Demonstrates a meetings via
    success of the research
    cooperative and messenger or
    that includes collection
    supportive attitude. online (respond
    of data, construction
    10 – Excellent to the group
    NAME OF MEMBERS of research paper etc. TOTAL
    8 – Good chats)
    10 – Excellent
    6 – Fair 10 – Excellent
    8 – Good
    4 – Poor 8 – Good
    6 – Fair
    1 – Very poor 6 – Fair
    4 – Poor
    4 – Poor
    1 – Very poor
    1 – Very poor
    1. Albacite, Fevee Shaine 4 1 6 11

    2. Abella, Eleazar Jr 4 1 8 13

    3. Blanco, Jannah Alyssa 4 1 6 11

    4. Gooc, Cecile 8 6 6 20

    5. Garnica, Stefanny 6 1 8 15

    - - - -

    Comments: Some of them is responsive naman but wala pud kabalo og unsaon
    jud since wala nang gi attend atong ga discuss or di nalang pud manggi research
    nag hatag kog questionnaire para ilang pang survey sa research but isa lang juy
    nag sent always nako gina remind nya sigeg ingog busy daw or di lang jud
    mulihok. After all we finished our research on time so I’ll just let it slide for now.

    You might also like