School of Criminology

LEA 1: LAW ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION AND

ORGANIZATION (INTER-AGENCY APPROACH)
Student: Student Number:__________
Year Level/Section:__________ Schedule:_________________
Name of Professor: Jayson Eisma Necida, MSC, MA

Activity Number 2
EVOLUTION OF POLICING IN THE INTERNATIONAL SETTING

I. Learning Objective:
● Trace and summarize the historical background of policing
in the worldwide setting;
● Identify key events and proponent of policing worldwide
setting;
● Identify significant statutes in the development of policing
system in the worldwide setting.
II. Materials:
Books relevant to the subject
Any equipment for browsing

III. Procedures
. Identify at least five (5) historical concepts and provide its
counterpart
at present

IV. Discussion
(Give an overview of the evolution of policing in the international
setting in not more than five sentences.)

V. Assessment
. Identify at least five (5) historical concepts and provide its
counterpart
at present
HISTORICAL CONCEPT COUNTERPART
Example: Tythingmen Squad system – policemen
will be assigned into group of
10 led by a life coach in the
PNP.
Police Administration An organizational process
concerned with the
implementation ofthe objectives
Organization A group of people who work
together in an organized way
for a shared purpose
Police Organization A structured group of highly
trained personnel dealt with
achieving the following goals
and objectives
Police The act of maintaining
discipline or ensuring that the
rules must be observed
Administration The determination of objectives
and major policies of an
organization.

VI. Reflection
(State the significance of understanding the evolution of policing in
the international setting)
understanding evolution help us solve biological problems that
impact in our lives.
VII. Reinforcing the Knowledge
(Explain the picture below. Minimum of 3-5 sentences)

that is the symbol of the lady justice the blindfold is symbolize

objectivity impartially and fair treatment.
 VIII. Attachments (Pictures relevant to your answers in in the
Assessment part particularly the listed modern counterparts)

Submitted by: Margelyn Mijares Submitted to:

Jayson Eisma Necida, MSC, MA
________________________ ________________________
Signature of Student Above Printed Name Signature of Professor
Date Submitted: Date Corrected:
Grading Rubric:
Technical Content (60%): Technical Correctness, appropriate level of detail and
thoroughness of documentation and grammatically and stylistically correct
laboratory report.
Visuals/Attachments (40%): Well-ordered and detailed laboratory attachments.