You are on page 1of 7

3G CASES ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION

CASE 1:
ISSUE: Poor Quality

ANALYSIS: Poor quality due to non-dominant server caused by overshooting UABJ172_S2, UABJ335_S2
and UABJ008_S2.
RECOMMENDATION: Physical audit and EDT by 2degrees should be carried out on UABJ335_S2,
UABJ172_S2 and UABJ008_S2.
CASE2:
ISSUE: Poor Quality

ANALYSIS: Poor quality caused by wide inter site distance UABJ148 and UABJ102 and a suspected swap on
UABJ102.
RECOMMENDATION: Physical audit, swap check and swap correction should be carried out on UABJ102.
This will proffer a temporary solution to the quality issue.
CASE3:
ISSUES: Poor Quality

ANALYSIS: Poor quality caused by overshooting UABJ148_S2 serving from 3.492km away.
RECOMMENDATION: Physical and EDT of UABJ148_S2 is required to limit its overshooting coverage to
allow for dominance of AUBJ077 and UABJ719.
CASE4:
ISSUE: Poor Quality.

ANALYSIS: Poor quality as a result of inter site distance and over shooting cell UABJ018_S6.
RECOMMENDATION: Audit and EDT of UABJ018_S6 will serve as temporary solution. A deployment of a
new site will site in between UABJ771 and UABJ271 will improve customer experience along route.
4G CASES ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION
CASE 1:
ISSUE: Poor Quality.

ANALYSIS: Poor quality caused by suspected swap on CABJ271.


RECOMMENDATION: Physical Audit, swap check and possible swap correction on CABJ271 will improve
quality along path.
CASE 2
ISSUE: Poor Quality.

ANALYSIS: Poor SINR due to coverage hole caused by the unfavorable terrain of the issue area.
RECOMMENDATION: Physical audit of CABJ071 is required to ascertain the actual antenna orientation and
physical parameters on site for possible optimization. MDT of CABJ071_S2 will resolve the poor SINR at
issue path.
CASE 3
ISSUE: Poor Coverage and Quality.

ANALYSIS: Suspected swap on CABJ650 and delay in hand over between CABJ285_S6 and CABJ190_S5.
RECOMMENDATION: Audit, swap check and possible swap correction should be carried out on CABJ650.
Also hand over threshold between CABJ285_S6 and CABJ190_S4 should be reviewed.

CASE4:
ISSUES: Poor QUALITY

ANALYSIS: Poor quality caused by high PRB Utilization on CABJ077 at the time of drive and suspected
swap on CABJ077.
RECOMMENDATIONS: Physical audit, swap check and possible swap correction will be carried out on
CABJ077.
CASE 5
ISSUE: Poor Coverage and Quality

ANALYSIS: Poor Quality and Coverage due to overshooting CABJ077_S1 and suspected swap on EABJ148.
RECOMMENDATION: Audit and EDT CABJ077_S1 by 2 degrees to allow dominance of CABJ148 along path.
Also Audit, check for swap and possible correct swap at EABJ148.
CASE 6:
ISSUES: Poor Quality Coverage.

ANALYSIS: Poor coverage and quality due to no dominant server caused by over shooting cell CABJ384_S4.
RECOMMENDATION: EDT by CABJ384_S4 by 1degree to allow dominance and target sites along path.

CASE 7
ISSUE: Poor Quality.

ANALYSIS: Poor quality due to overshooting cell CABJ102_S5 causing interference and making SINR go bad
at the location
RECOMMENDATION: Remove the interfering cell by EDT of CABJ102_S5 by 2degree and review
CASE 8
ISSUE: Poor Quality.

ANALYSIS: Poor quality caused by overshooting CABJ384_S4


RECOMMENDATION: EDT of CAJ384_S4 by 1degree will make quality will improve quality at the driven
path.

You might also like