Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ACTIVITY NO. 3
Chiller Efficiency
Barachina, Aldrian
Ocheda, Roecca B.
BSME-NS4A
TEAM 6
A chiller takes heat away from and cools the target device. The extracted heat
must be evacuated by the chiller itself, and there are two types of heat exhaust
methods: those that utilize refrigerants and those that employ water circuits to
circulate water. Air-cooled and water-cooled cooling methods are two
examples of cooling methods.
A.) Air-Cooled Chiller - This is a system that sends wind to the heat exchanger
and uses air to cool the refrigerant. Although the chiller has a built-in fan
motor that is simple to install, because exhaust heat is created in the room,
exhaust equipment may be necessary in small areas. A condenser
(radiator) cools and liquefies the gas compressed by the freezer
(compressor). It has a refrigerant gas cycle and a circulating water cycle,
with refrigerant gas serving as a heat medium for cooling the circulating
water.
B.) Water-Cooled Chiller - A cooling tower is used to chill water in this sort of
system. Refrigerator cooling water is necessary, but it has several
advantages, including good cooling efficiency and the absence of exhaust
heat in the room.
Chillers use more than 40% of the total energy needed for space cooling in
commercial and industrial buildings. The energy consumption of chillers and
chilled water pumps, condenser pumps, and fan motors has been evaluated in
this report using data from a walkthrough energy audit of the University of
Malaya's 16 faculties. For various percentages of loadings, chillers and the
motors and pumps used in chillers are predicted to use 10,737 MWh (or 51
percent of total energy consumption). Variable speed drives are used in chillers
to minimize energy consumption because they are big energy consumers. It is
projected that
adopting efficient
chillers at various
loadings can save
roughly 8368
MWh of yearly
energy. It was
also shown that
matching needed
speeds utilizing
variable speed
drives for 60
percent speed
reduction may
save roughly 23,532 MWh of yearly energy for chilled water supply pumps,
condenser pumps, and cooling tower fan motors. Using energy efficient chillers
at 50% load might save around 1,274,692 kg of CO2. It was also shown that
adopting variable speed drives for 60 percent speed decreases may save
roughly 2,426,769 kg CO2. Variable speed drives in chilled water pumps,
condensers, and fan motors were shown to have short payback times of only
a few months.
V. Performance Parameters of the Chiller Related to Energy Efficiency
Chillers are one of a building's major energy users, which has a significant
influence on operating expenses. As a result, it's critical to keep an eye on your
chillers to assess their efficiency and assure peak performance. So, in this post,
we'll look at how to calculate a chiller's efficiency. The efficiency of a chiller may
be calculated very easily. It is expressed in terms of "COP," which stands for
Coefficient of Performance.
It is critical to remember that the COP of a chiller changes with cooling load
and that each chiller has a distinct COP. To detect performance difficulties, the
chiller manufacturer should be able to supply the COP design data, which you
may compare to the performance of your chiller. Conventional single speed
chillers typically achieve their highest COP at or near maximum load, but most
chillers operate at part load 98
percent of the time. If this is the
case, contact a specialist to see if
a variable frequency drive (VSD)
can be retrofitted to the motor
controls, which reduces the
rotation speed of the compressor,
lowering electrical demand and
increasing the COP at part load.
VI. Baseline Efficiency Level of the Chiller
While there are several causes that lead to decreasing chiller efficiency, the
five most prevalent are: improper operating procedures, ignored or postponed
maintenance, ignored cooling tower maintenance, oversizing, and disregarding
alternate-fuel chillers. While each of these causes constitutes a genuine and
severe danger to chiller efficiency, maintenance managers may readily reduce
or remove them.
Poor operating practices - might reduce not just chiller efficiency but also
chiller longevity. Most of such behaviors are the result of one of two situations:
attempting to force a chiller to do something it was not meant to do or failing to
grasp the repercussions of a certain operation.
For example, increasing the rate of chilled water flow via the chiller is a
frequent approach when trying to offer additional cooling water to a facility.
More cooling water is thought to be available with a greater flow rate.
Because cooling towers are exposed to the weather, they acquire dirt,
leaves, and other material that can obstruct air and water passageways.
Furthermore, the warm, wet atmosphere in which they work encourages
biological development, which can clog spray nozzles and diminish heat-
transfer efficiency. Solids buildup in cooling tower water can also choke spray
nozzles and water passageways.
However, given the condition of facility churn, the loads that a chiller
experiences after only a few years might be drastically different from those for
which it was intended. This is especially true if a facility has been changed to
increase its energy efficiency.
1.) Consider variable speed retrofits. Variable speed drives will benefit
the majority of components in a chilled water system. In fact, VFDs are required
by most contemporary energy standards for these components in new systems
and substantial retrofits. VFD costs have also dropped considerably in recent
years.
Cooling tower fans are another area where VFDs might help you conserve
electricity. Variable speed fan motors not only reduce fan energy owing to fan
law benefits (a fan at 50% speed takes 12.5 percent of the power of a fan
running at 100% speed), but also provide more consistent temperature
regulation when loads and outdoor wet-bulb temperature fall.
Variable speed pumping can give a chance for energy savings, but it needs
a detailed examination of other components of the system. A constant to
variable flow retrofit of chilled water may necessitate extensive and costly
upgrades of control valves and control sequences. Additionally, the variable
flow capabilities of current chillers must be examined. Low chiller flow
restrictions may affect the economic viability of variable chilled water pumping.
Variable flow management on the condenser water side may be limited by
chiller flow needs or cooling tower fouling/freezing problems. However, if the
pumps on a constant flow system are large, balancing pump flow by decreasing
speed against flow limitation using a balancing value may offer a significant
return even if variable flow is not added during system operation.
3.) Raise the temperature of the supply. Most commercial systems are
constructed with chilled water supply temperatures ranging from 40 to 45
degrees Fahrenheit. During peak periods, this typically provides for proper
dehumidification and an acceptable supply air temperature in occupant areas.
These peak weather and load circumstances, however, are uncommon.
Beside from the calculations that are given above, here are some
calculations that focuses on energy efficiency of a chiller: