Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Gordons Written

    Uploaded by

    justine tapil
    5 views2 pages
    The document provides an evaluation tool to assess written patient assessments. It evaluates several areas including Gordon's 11 functional health care patterns, physical assessment, prioritization of problems, justification of problems, writing skills, and references. For each area, evaluators can choose between excellent, good, fair, or poor based on specific criteria described for each rating. For example, an "excellent" rating for prioritization of problems requires all problems are correctly prioritized based on methods like Maslow's hierarchy of needs, while a "poor" rating means problems were incorrectly prioritized. The tool aims to provide a standardized way to evaluate the quality of written patient assessments.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    gordons written

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document provides an evaluation tool to assess written patient assessments. It evaluates several areas including Gordon's 11 functional health care patterns, physical assessment, prioritization of problems, justification of problems, writing skills, and references. For each area, evaluators can choose between excellent, good, fair, or poor based on specific criteria described for each rating. For example, an "excellent" rating for prioritization of problems requires all problems are correctly prioritized based on methods like Maslow's hierarchy of needs, while a "poor" rating means problems were incorrectly prioritized. The tool aims to provide a standardized way to evaluate the quality of written patient assessments.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Gordons Written

    Uploaded by

    justine tapil
    The document provides an evaluation tool to assess written patient assessments. It evaluates several areas including Gordon's 11 functional health care patterns, physical assessment, prioritization of problems, justification of problems, writing skills, and references. For each area, evaluators can choose between excellent, good, fair, or poor based on specific criteria described for each rating. For example, an "excellent" rating for prioritization of problems requires all problems are correctly prioritized based on methods like Maslow's hierarchy of needs, while a "poor" rating means problems were incorrectly prioritized. The tool aims to provide a standardized way to evaluate the quality of written patient assessments.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    R.

    06

    GENERAL SANTOS DOCTORS’ MEDICAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION, INC.


    EVALUATION TOOL FOR ASSESSMENT OF PATIENT (WRITTEN)
    NAME ________________________________________________ AREA _________________________________ DATE

    AREAS EXCELLENT GOOD FAIR POOR


    4 3 2 1
    GORDON’S 11 All of the data are organized and Most of the data are organized and There are patterns that are inappropriately All of the patterns were inappropriately
    FUNCTIONAL HEALTH described correctly. Past and present described correctly. Past and present history organized and described. Past and present described
    CARE PATTERNS history of the patient’s illness are of the patient’s illness are described history are incompletely described.
    described exhaustively. superficially.
    PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT All of the body systems/parts are Most of the body systems/parts are Some of the body systems/parts are Assessment of the body systems/parts are
    correctly and thoroughly assessed and correctly and thoroughly assessed and correctly and thoroughly assessed and incomplete and incorrectly described.
    described following the correct method described following the correct method of described following the correct method of
    of assessment. assessment. assessment.

    PRIORITIZATION All of the problems are correctly Most of the problems are correctly Only a few of the problems are correctly Problems were incorrectly prioritized.
    prioritized based on Maslow’s Hierarchy prioritized based on Maslow’s Hierarchy of prioritized based on Maslow’s Hierarchy of
    of needs or other methods of needs or other methods of prioritization. needs or other methods of prioritization.
    prioritization.

    Justification of the problems are all Most of the justification of the problem are Only a few were justified and are correctly Justification of the problem was based on
    JUSTIFICATION correctly stated and are based on related correctly stated and are based on related stated. Justification is based on related personal opinion.
    literature. literature. literature.
    Writing is totally free of grammar and There are occasional grammar and spelling There are more than occasional grammar Grammar and spelling errors are
    WRITING SKILLS spelling errors. errors. and spelling errors. frequent.
    Clear and concise presentation of ideas. Clear presentation of ideas. Most ideas are presented clearly.
    Hard to follow the ideas.
    All references used are important and Most of the references cited and listed are No references cited.
    REFERENCES current; are of good/scholarly quality. not important and/or not of good/scholarly
    References are correctly cited. quality. References are not correctly cited
    and listed.
    COMMENTS: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
    CI’S NAME AND SIGNATURE: _______________________

    You might also like