Hydrology Report

Detailed Project Report
Construction of four-lane Greenfield

Amritsar connectivity for Connection of
Amritsar with Delhi-Amritsar-Katra
Expressway from Junction with
Kapurthala – Sultanpur Lodhi road (NH-
703A) near Isharwal village ch.24+000 to
MDR Junction at ch. 40+900 Dhunda
Village on EPC mode under Bharatmala
Pariyojna in the state of Punjab.
(Amritsar Connectivity)
Hydrology Report
June- 2021
for National Highways Authority of India

Feedback Infra Private Limited
Delhi Katra Expressway - Amritsar Connectivilty Road Project
Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis

of
Major Bridge at Design Ch. 22.345 Km (West or Black Bein River ) on Amritsar
Greenfield Road
Table of Content
S.No. Item Description
1.0 Summary Sheet
2.0 Introduction
3.0 Codes & References
4.0 Design Approach
5.0 Hydrological Calculation
6.0 HFL Calculation
7.0 Afflux Calculation
8.0 Scour Calculation
9.0 Catchment area marking
1 of 16 Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis

1. Summary Sheet
Summary of Hydrological studies of Bridge
Dicken's Slope
method Synthetic Unit Hydrograph method (cumec) Area
(cumec) method
Catch- Average Design
Rational's by
Chaina ment annual Discharge
Sl. No. 100 year Discharge observed Remarks
ge (km) Area rainfall Length of Level at Equivale Discharge adopted
(sq.km) (mm) Dicken Bed Level return period (cumec) HFL/ (cumec)
Dicken Q Longest u/s of nt river by SUH
co- at Bridge rainfall for 24 water
(cumec) Stream, L Stream slope (m/ method Q
efficient (m) hr (CWC sub mark
(km) (m) Km) (cumec)
zone 1e) (cumec)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Factored
Discharge
1 22.345 2509.00 600.00 11.00 3899.58 130.00 513.00 219.000 0.728 240.00 2388.00 947.17 829.85 1244.77 adopted as
design
discharge
Summary of Hydraulic Studies of Bridge

As Per CA Hydraulic details of Bridge Scour Levels
Vent
Chaina Total Total
Existing Min. Height At
Sl. No. ge Skew Skew Square Bed level Velocity Vertical At Pier(s) Remarks
No. of Vent Flow Area Design HFL HFL with Required Required Mean Scour Abutments
(km) Angle C/C C/C at Bridge at C/S Afflux (m) Clearance Location
Span Height (sq.m) (m) Afflux (m) Soffit level as per Depth (m) Location
(deg) Width Width (m) (m/s) (m) (m)
(m) (m) Hydrology (m)
(m) (m)
(m)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Proposed 3
span of 35
1 22.345 3 0 35.00 35.0 - 210.091 482.76 2.580 216.031 0.293 216.324 1.200 217.524 7.43 8.48 - 205.55 m with
Abutment &
pier
Notes: 1) Minimum proposed soffit level (m) in any case not be less than that of existing bridge.
2) In the event that bedrock is encountered above the calculated scour level, bridge pier(s) / abutments should be anchored to the bedrock.

2.0 Introduction
The Hydrological and hydraulic calculations has been carried out for proposed Major
bridge at ch. 22.345 Km to justify the waterway required for the stream crossing
the alignment.
Name of Stream : West or Black Bein Nalla

CWC flood estimation Sub zone : Upper Indo- Ganga Plains subzone 1(e)
Flow Direction : From Right to Left
Normal Annual Rainfall in mm : 600
2.1 Data for Bridge Location
Name of River / Stream / Nala Chainage (Km)
West or Black Bein Nalla 22.345

Cumulative
Segmental
Sr.No. Segmental Elevation (m)
Length (m)
Length (m)
1 0 0 219
2 10000 12500 221
3 10000 25000 222
4 10000 37500 224
5 10000 50000 225
6 10000 62500 226
7 10000 75000 228
8 10000 87500 243
9 10000 100000 277
10 10000 112500 352
11 10000 125000 485
12 10000 130000 513
Water Shed Area in Sq Km(A) 2509
Watershed Length in Km (L) 130
Point Rainfall Value (100 years) in mm 240.000
CWC Flood Estimation Report Subzone = 1e

IRC: SP-13:2004- Guidelines for design of small bridges & Culverts
IRC:5:2000- Standard specifications and code of practice for road bridges section-I
IRC:89:1997- Guidelines for design and construction of River Training and control works for road bridges
IRC: SP-84: 2014- Manual of specifications and standards for four laning of highways through public private partnership.
IRC-78:2014- Standard specifications and code of practice for road bridges Section - VII
CWC- Flood Estimation report for Upper Indo Ganga Plains subzone 1(e)
4.0 Design Approach

The detailed survey has been conducted at proposed bridge location in both upstream and
downstream directions which provide precise stream profile. The L-section and cross sections of the
stream are generated at all required locations including at bridge site, U/S & D/S of bridge location
from survey data.

Catchment area and main stream length has been marked on the toposheet as attached.
Discharge has been calculated using (i) Empirical method, (ii) Rational Method (iii) Slope area method
(iv) Synthetic unit hydrograph method. As per CWC guideline, for catchment area >25 sq.km,
the discharge obtained from SUH method shall be adopted.
The hydrological and hydraulic calculations has been done for 100 years return period.

5.1 Peak Design Discharge Calculation
The flood dicharge is computed by different methods as listed below. The values obtained are
compared and highest among these values has been adopted as peak design discharge.
(i) Empirical formula ( Dicken's method)
(ii) Rational method
(iii) Slope Area method
(iv) Synthetic Unit Hydrograph Method ( for Catchment area more than 25 sq. km)
5.1.1. Emperical Method
Dicken's Formula
Q = CA3/4 (Ref: IRC:SP-13-2004, Cl.4.2)
Catchment Area A = 2509 Sq. Km.

Coefficient C = 11
C = 11 -14 , where the annual rainfall is 60 -120cm.
= 14 -19, where the annual rainfall is more than 120 cm.
= 22 in western ghats
Peak Runoff in m3/s
3
Q= 3899.58 m /s
5.1.2 Rational Method

Catchment Area A = 2509 Sq. Km. = 250900 ha
Length of Longest River L = 130 Km.
Level at upstream of the stream = 513 m
Level at bridge location = 219 m
Height H = 294 m
Time of Concentration
tc = (0.87 x L3/H)0.385 = 29.38 Hr. (Ref: IRC:SP-13-2004, Eq.4.9)
100 Year Return Period rainfall for 24 hr, F = 240.000 mm

(CWC Flood Estimation Report for Sub Zone 1e)
Conversion ratio for tc hrs as per CWC Flood Estimation
Report = 0.917
tc Hr Rainfall = 220.08 mm
Intensity of Rainfall Ic
Ic = (F/T) x((T+1)/(tc+1)) = 0.82 cm/hr (Ref: IRC:SP-13-2004, Eq.4.10a)
Spread Factor by f Curve from SP 13 = 0.55 (Ref: IRC:SP-13-2004, Fig.4.2)

Permeability coefficient as per terrain condition P from
SP 13 = 0.3 (Ref: IRC:SP-13-2004, Table 4.1)
Design Discharge Q100 = 0.0278 P f A Ic
3
= 947.17 m /s

5.1.3 Slope Area Method

Local Enquiry HFL observed at site = 215.500 m (1.5m above avg G.L-214m )
CROSS SECTION AT BRIDGE C/L (10m D/S)
HFL _Obs 215.5
Lowest Dist-
Offset(m) Bed Level Observed HFL h Avg h Diff in h Area Perimeter
B.L. ance
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m2) (m)
0 215.465 215.5 210.091 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

19.932 215.339 215.5 210.091 19.932 0.161 0.081 0.161 1.605 19.933
39.657 214.901 215.5 210.091 19.725 0.599 0.380 0.438 7.495 19.730
59.572 214.68 215.5 210.091 19.915 0.820 0.709 0.221 14.130 19.916
79.511 214.104 215.5 210.091 19.939 1.396 1.108 0.576 22.092 19.947
84.608 210.211 215.5 210.091 5.097 5.289 3.342 3.893 17.037 6.414
94.066 210.285 215.5 210.091 9.458 5.215 5.252 0.074 49.673 9.458
102.283 210.091 215.5 210.091 8.217 5.409 5.312 0.194 43.649 8.219
109.335 210.469 215.5 210.091 7.052 5.031 5.220 0.378 36.811 7.062
119.621 213.801 215.5 210.091 10.286 1.699 3.365 3.332 34.612 10.812
140.085 213.516 215.5 210.091 20.464 1.984 1.842 0.285 37.684 20.466
159.67 213.711 215.5 210.091 19.585 1.789 1.887 0.195 36.947 19.586
179.949 213.576 215.5 210.091 20.279 1.924 1.857 0.135 37.648 20.279
200.22 213.571 215.5 210.091 20.271 1.929 1.927 0.005 39.052 20.271
Sum = 378.436 202.094
Wetted perimeter R = A/P R 1.873
Manning's Value n 0.04
Channel slope = 1 in 300 S 0.00333
Velocity in channel (m/s) V 2.19
K = (1/n) x A x R^(2/3) Keq 14373
Calculated discharge (cumec) Q 829.85
Max. depth below HFL (m) Dd (max) 5.409
observed HFL
Cross Section at D/S of bridge location Series1
216
215
River Bed Level(m)
214
213
212
211
210
209
0 50 100 150 200 250
Chainage(m)

5.1.3.1 Calculation of channel slope

Longitudinal Section of Stream
Lowest
S.No. Distance (m)
elevation (m)
1 0 210.279
2 35.479 210.567
3 65.735 210.506
4 90.44 210.234
5 113.043 210.091
6 136.821 209.652
7 150.608 209.983
8 175.22 209.943
Stream Slope Series1 Linear (Series1)

212
211.5 y = -0.0038x + 210.52

R² = 0.5662
211
210.5
210
209.5
209
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Slope of channel(1 in ..) = 1/0.0038 = 263

Adopt channel slope as 300
5.1.4 Synthetic Unit Hydrograph Method

A. Computation of Stream Slope for River
Equivalent Stream Slope method is used for calculation the slope of the stream
River Name : West or Black Bein Nalla
Length of River : 130.00 km

Reduced Height
Segment
Sl Distance Segment above Li * (Di +
Reduced Level Length Di + Di-1
No. from Pt. of Length datum, Di-1)
Li
study Di
m m m km m m km.m
1 0 219 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 12500 221 12500 12.50 2.00 2.00 25.00
3 25000 222 12500 12.50 3.00 5.00 62.50
4 37500 224 12500 12.50 5.00 8.00 100.00
5 50000 225 12500 12.50 6.00 11.00 137.50
6 62500 226 12500 12.50 7.00 13.00 162.50
7 75000 228 12500 12.50 9.00 16.00 200.00
8 87500 243 12500 12.50 24.00 33.00 412.50
9 100000 277 12500 12.50 58.00 82.00 1025.00
10 112500 352 12500 12.50 133.00 191.00 2387.50
11 125000 485 12500 12.50 266.00 399.00 4987.50
12 130000 513 5000 5.00 294.00 560.00 2800.00
Total 130.00 12300.00
2
Equivalent River Slope = Σ Li * (Di + Di-1) / L
= ( 12300 / 130^2) = 0.728 m / Km
B. Calculations for 1 Hr. Synthetic Unit Hydrograph
1 Catchment Area, A = 2509.00 Sq.Km.
CWC Subzone = 1e
Length of Main stream, L = 130.00 Km.
Equivalent Stream Slope S = 0.728 m / Km
L/S = 178.618
L / (sqrt(S)) = 152.382
Therefore, following relationships have been used for estimating 2-hr unit hydrograph parameter of the said catchment.
2 UG Runoff Vol. = Area under UG = Area*1cm 25090000 m3
tp = 1.858 / (qp)1.038 26.328 hr,

Adopt 24.000 hr,
qp = 2.030/(L/Sqrt(s))0.649 0.078 Cumec/sq.km
Qp= qp xA 195.11 Cumec

Unit Duration (tr)= 2.00 hr
Time from rise to peak

25.00 hr
(Tm)= tp+tr/2
TB = 7.744 (tp)0.779 92.08 hr
Adopt 92.0 hr
0.990
W50= 2.217 /(qp) 27.79 hr
W75= 1.477/ (qp)0.876 13.838 hr
WR-50= 0.812/ (qp)0.907 8.234 hr
WR-75= 0.606/(qp)0.791 4.570 hr
TD= 1.1 tp 26.400 hr, Say 24.00 hr

Base Flow = 0.05 Cumec/SqKm
Loss Rate = 0.60 cm/hr

C. Development of Synthetic Unit Hydrograph
Synthetic Unit Hydrograph

250
200
Discharge (cumecs)
150
100
50
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100
Time (hr)

D. Development of 1cm Unit Hydrograph

U.G ordinates
UGH
Time (Hr) Ordinate
(cumec)
0 0
2 11.61
4 22
6 36
8 46
10 58
12 68
14 80
16 93
18 113
20 150
22 180
24 195.11
26 189
28 175
30 164
32 150
34 140
36 128
38 118
40 108
42 102
44 97
46 92
48 87
50 82
52 77
54 72
56 69
58 66
60 62
62 58
64 55
66 52
68 49
70 45
72 38
74 31
76 27
78 26
80 23
82 20
84 14
86 10
88 5
90 1
92 0
Total (Cumec)= 3484.72
(Qi)=(A*d)/(tr*0.36) = 3484.72
d= 1 cm

E. Estimation of 100 years Return Period Flood
100 year flood discharge shall be considered for designing waterway
a. For Design Hydrograph
100-year TD - hr Point Rainfall (From Charts)

100-year 24 - hr Point Rainfall : 240 mm
Conversion Factor for 24 hr 1

100-year 24.000 - hr Point Rainfall : 24 cm
Conversion Factor for areal reduction 0.77 A = 2509 sq. km
100-year 24.000 - hr Areal Rainfall : 18.48 cm

Loss Rate = 0.6 cm / hr
(Ref. - Flood Estimation Report for SubZones 1 e - CWC)
Calculation of 100-year
( From % Rainfall vs % Time Graph)
Effective Rainfall
Rainfall Hourly
Cumulative R.F. Loss Rate
hr % hr % Rainfall increment Effective
increment (cm) (cm/hr)
(cm) Rainfall (cm)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
2 8.3% 42.0% 7.76 7.76 0.60 7.16
4 16.7% 50.0% 9.24 1.48 0.60 0.88
6 25.0% 64.0% 11.83 2.59 0.60 1.99
8 33.3% 73.0% 13.49 1.66 0.60 1.06
10 41.7% 80.0% 14.78 1.29 0.60 0.69
12 50.0% 84.0% 15.52 0.74 0.60 0.14
14 58.3% 88.0% 16.26 0.74 0.60 0.14
16 66.7% 90.0% 16.63 0.37 0.60 0.00
18 75.0% 92.0% 17.00 0.37 0.60 0.00
20 83.3% 95.0% 17.56 0.55 0.60 0.00
22 91.7% 98.0% 18.11 0.55 0.60 0.00
24 100.0% 100.0% 18.48 0.37 0.60 0.00
Total 18.480

b. 100-Year Peak Flood
Direct
UG Ordinates Effective Rainfall
Time(Hr) Runoff
(cumecs) (cm)
(cumec)
24 195.11 7.16 1397.28
26 189 0.88 166.02
22 180 1.99 357.70
28 175 1.06 186.06
30 164 0.69 113.75
20 150 0.14 20.88
32 150 0.14 20.88
34 140 0.00 0.00
36 128 0.00 0.00
38 118 0.00 0.00
18 113 0.00 0.00
40 108 0.00 0.00
Total Runoff (cumec) = 2262.56
Base Flow (cumec) = 125.45
Peak Flow = Total Runoff + Base Flow (cumec) 2388.00
Hence, 100 year flood peak = 2388.00 Cumecs
5.2 Adopted Peak Design Discharge

Discharge by Dicken's method = 3899.58 m3/s ( Not applicable)
Discharge by Rational method = 947.17 m3/s ( Not applicable)
Discharge by Observed HFL = 829.85 m3/s
Discharge by SUH Method = 2388.00 m3/s
Hence, Peak Design Discharge = 1.5x 829.85 = 1244.77 m3/s
Note: Dicken's and Rational are suitable for small catchment area, Hence ignored. Comparision
between Slope area and SUH has been made. Also, the area within the catchment area has well
defined irrigation and drainage basin plans, Hence, Flood water shall not directly reaches to bridge
location and having much more time to peak.

6 HFL Calculation by Area - Velocity method based on Design Discharge
3
HFL _100 216.031 Q100= 1244.77 m /s
Min.
Natural
Offset Bed Level Channel Distance h Avg h Diff in h Area Perimeter
HFL
B.L.
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m2) (m)
0 215.465 216.031 210.091 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

19.932 215.339 216.031 210.091 19.932 0.692 0.346 0.692 6.896 19.944
39.657 214.901 216.031 210.091 19.725 1.130 0.911 0.438 17.969 19.730
59.572 214.68 216.031 210.091 19.915 1.351 1.241 0.221 24.705 19.916
79.511 214.104 216.031 210.091 19.939 1.927 1.639 0.576 32.680 19.947
84.608 210.211 216.031 210.091 5.097 5.820 3.873 3.893 19.743 6.414
94.066 210.285 216.031 210.091 9.458 5.746 5.783 0.074 54.696 9.458
102.283 210.091 216.031 210.091 8.217 5.940 5.843 0.194 48.012 8.219
109.335 210.469 216.031 210.091 7.052 5.562 5.751 0.378 40.556 7.062
119.621 213.801 216.031 210.091 10.286 2.230 3.896 3.332 40.074 10.812
140.085 213.516 216.031 210.091 20.464 2.515 2.373 0.285 48.551 20.466
164.572 213.553 216.031 210.091 24.487 2.478 2.497 0.037 61.134 24.487
179.949 213.576 216.031 210.091 15.377 2.455 2.467 0.023 37.928 15.377
200.22 213.571 216.031 210.091 20.271 2.460 2.458 0.005 49.816 20.271
Sum = 482.76 202.104
K = (1/n) x A x R^(2/3) Keq 21566.33
Calc. discharge (Cumec) Q 1245.13

Cross Section at bridge location HFL
CS Data
217
216
215
River Bed Level(m)
214
213
212
211
210
209
0 50 100 150 200 250
Chainage(m)

7 Afflux / Velocity Calculation under Bridge
7.1 Lacey's Waterway Calculation for 100 yr flood
Adopted Design Discharge Q 1244.8 Cumecs

Regime width L= 4.8 x Q0.5 L 169.35 m
Required Minimum Waterway 0.6 x L 101.6 m
7.2 MolesWorth Formulae

Proposed 3 span of 35 m with Abutment & pier
Proposed span = 3 x 35 m
Skew angle = 0 degree
Total Skew clear width = 105.0 m
Afflux, h= ( ( v2 / 17.88 ) + 0.015) ( ( A / A1 )2 - 1 )

Where
v - Average velocity of river prior to obstruction in m/sec = 2.58
A - Unobstructed sectional area of river in sq. m = 482.76
A1 - Sectional area of river at obstruction in sq. m = 364.21
Afflux h in m = 0.293
Adopt afflux 0.293 m

HFL without Afflux = 216.031 m
HFL with Afflux = 216.324 m
Minimum Vertical clearance required = 1.2 m

Minimum soffit level required = 216.324 + 1.2
= 217.524 m
Min. Vent Required = 217.524 -210.091
= 7.433 m

8 Scour Calculation
The mean depth of scour dsm shall be calculated below HFL as per the provision of
Clause 703.2 of IRC :78 -2000
dsm = 1.34 x ( Db2/Ksf)1/3
where,
dsm = Mean scour depth below HFL
Db = (Q/L) ,
Q= Discharge adopted for scour depth calculations
(after increasing the design discharge as per clause 703.1.1 of IRC 78: 2000)
L= Clear waterway after making deductions for obstruction upto HFL
Db = The design discharge for foundation per metre with effective linear waterway
Ksf = Silt factor for a representative sample of bed material obtained upto the level
of anticipated deepest scour
HFL = Highest flood level
3
Design Discharge Q = 1244.77 m /s
HFL Calculated = 216.324 m
Lowest bed level at existing bridge = 210.091 m
Ksf = 1.00
Fine Sand Strata
Effective waterway L = 101.6 m
3
Increase in design discharge by 30% (Q) = 1618.2 m /s
Db = Q/L = 15.927 Cumec/m
Mean Scour Depth dsm = 8.483 m
Maximum scour depth at abutment
= 1.27 x dsm = 10.773 m
Maximum scour depth at Piers
= 2 x dsm = - m
Max. scour level for abutment = 205.551 m

Max. scour level for pier = - m
Scour depth below abutment w.r.t bed level = 4.540 m

Scour depth below pier w.r.t bed level = - m

9. Catchment Area with Stream Line

Amritsar Connectivity Road Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis

of
Minor Bridge at Design Ch. 25.935 km ( Local Stream)
Table of Content
1.0 Summary Sheet
2.0 Introduction
4.0 Design Approach
6.0 Hydraulic Calculation
1.0 Summary Sheet

Summary of Hydrological Studies of Bridge
Sl. Chainage Catch-ment Average Dicken's method Rational method Slope Area Method Design Remarks
No. (km) Area annual Discharge
(sq.km) rainfall adopted
(mm) Dicken co- Dicken Q Length of Level at Bed Level Fall in 100 year Discharge Observed Observed
efficient (cumec) Longest u/s of at Bridge Level, H return by Rational HFL by discharge Q (cumec)
Stream, L Stream (m) (m) period method Q Water mark (cumec)
(km) (m) rainfall for (cumec) (m)
24 hr
(mm)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Discharge
from
Rational
1 25.935 1.435 600.00 11.00 14.42 1.04 217.00 215.315 1.69 240.00 16.35 216.00 1.773 16.35 adopted as
design
discharge

Vent
Total
Sl. Chainage Existing Vertical Min. Height Min D/S
Skew Total Skew Square Bed level Velocity Check Scour Min U/S Remarks
No. (km) Vent Flow Area Design HFL with Clearance/ Required Required floor
No. of Span Angle C/C Width C/C at Bridge at C/S Afflux (m) of Vent depth Floor length
Height (sq.m) HFL (m) Afflux (m) Free Board Soffit level as per Length
(deg) (m) Width (m) (m/s) height (m) (m)
(m) (m) (m) Hydrology (m)
(m)
(m)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Proposed 1 x
1 25.935 1 0 10.00 10.000 - 215.315 13.57 1.210 216.580 0.200 216.780 0.600 217.380 2.065 - 1.94 3.87 2.90 10m Box
type
Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis of Bridge at Km. 25.935
2.0 Introduction
The Hydrological and hydraulic calculations has been carried out for proposed minor
the alignment.
Name of Stream : Local Stream

CWC flood estimation Sub zone : Upper Indo - Ganga Plains suzone 1( e)
Watershed Area A in sq.km. : 1.435
Watershed length L : 1.04
Point Rainfall Value (100 yrs) in mm : 240

IRC: SP-84: 2014- Manual of specifications and standards for four laning of highways through public private
partnership.
CWC- Flood Estimation report for Upper Indo - Ganga Plains suzone 1( e)
4.0 Design Approch

downstream directions which provide stream profile.
Cross section and L- section at bridge location have beed taken for analysis from survey data.
Catchment area and main stream length has been marked on the settelite imaginaries as attached.
Discharge has been calculated using (i) Empirical method, (ii) Rational Method (iii) Slope area
method. The highest value of these three values is adopted as design discharge, provided it does not
exceed next highest discharge by more than 50 percent. If it does, restrict it to the limit.

(iii) Slope Area method.

Dicken's Formula
Q = CA3/4 (Ref: IRC:SP-13-2004, Cl.4.2)
Catchment Area A = 1.435 Sq. Km.

Coefficient C = 11
Peak Runoff in m3/s
3
Q= 14.42 m /s

Catchment Area A = 1.435 Sq. Km. = 143.5 ha
Length of Longest River L = 1.04 Km.
Level at upstream of the stream = 217 m
Level at bridge location = 215.315 m
Height H = 1.685 m
100 Year Return Period rainfall for 24 hr, F = 240 mm

(South Brahmaputra subzone (2b))

Permeability coefficient as per terrain
condition P from SP 13 = 0.3 (Ref: IRC:SP-13-2004, Table 4.1)
3
= 16.35 m /s
Local Enquiry/ water mark HFL observed at
site at existing bridge location = 216.000 m (Upto bank level Level)
CROSS SECTION AT BRIDGE C/L
HFL _Obs 216
Observed Lowest Dist-
Offset(m) Bed Level h Avg h Diff in h Area Perimeter
HFL B.L. ance
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m2) (m)
0 215.982 216 215.315 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1.96 216.022 216 215.315 1.960 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
5.971 215.825 216 215.315 4.011 0.175 0.088 0.175 0.351 4.015
6.671 216.168 216 215.315 0.700 0.000 0.088 0.175 0.061 0.722
7.659 215.315 216 215.315 0.988 0.685 0.343 0.685 0.338 1.202
9.794 215.66 216 215.315 2.135 0.340 0.513 0.345 1.094 2.163
17.013 216.178 216 215.315 7.219 0.000 0.170 0.340 1.227 7.227
21.894 216.141 216 215.315 4.881 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Sum = 3.072 15.328

K = (1/n) x A x R^(2/3) Keq 26.30
observed HFL
Cross Section at D/S of bridge location
C/S data
216.4
216.2
216.0
River Bed Level(m)
215.8
215.6
215.4
215.2
215.0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Chainage(m)

3
Discharge by Dicken's method = 14.42 m /s
3
Discharge by Rational method = 16.35 m /s
3
Discharge by Observed HFL = 1.77 m /s
Hence, Peak Design Discharge = 16.35 m3/s
5.3 Catchment area marking on Toposheets

6.0 Hydraulic Calculation

6.1 Longitudinal Section of Stream
Lowest
Distance
S.No. elevation
(m)
(m)
1 0 215.672
2 9.217 215.578
3 26.441 215.483
4 44.202 215.423
5 65.955 215.266
6 93.155 215.400
7 104.882 215.315
8 133.071 215.214
9 159.23 214.914
10 175.769 214.796
11 194.376 214.664
Stream Slope Series1 Linear (Series1)
215.8
215.6
215.4
y = -0.0045x + 215.66
215.2 R² = 0.9041
215
214.8
214.6
0 50 100 150 200 250
Slope of channel(1 in ..) = 1/0.0045 222

6.2 HFL Calculation
HFL for 100 Year flood
CROSS SECTION AT BRIDGE at C/L
HFL 216.58 Q100= 16.35 m3/s
Min.
Natural
HFL
B.L.
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m2) (m)
0 215.982 216.58 215.315 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1.96 216.022 216.58 215.315 1.960 0.558 0.279 0.558 0.547 2.038
5.971 215.825 216.58 215.315 4.011 0.755 0.657 0.197 2.633 4.016
6.671 216.168 216.58 215.315 0.700 0.412 0.584 0.343 0.408 0.780
7.659 215.315 216.58 215.315 0.988 1.265 0.839 0.853 0.828 1.305
9.794 215.66 216.58 215.315 2.135 0.920 1.093 0.345 2.332 2.163
17.013 216.178 216.58 215.315 7.219 0.402 0.661 0.518 4.772 7.238
21.894 216.141 216.58 215.315 4.881 0.439 0.421 0.037 2.052 4.881
Sum = 13.574 22.420
(Ref: IRC:SP-13-2004, Table-5.1, sub point 4, Perfect) Manning's Value n 0.04

(Ref: IRC:SP-13-2004, Eq-5.2) K = (1/n) x A x R^(2/3) Keq 242.85
Calculated discharge (Cumec) Q 16.37
Average depth = Dd (av) 0.714
Unobstructed width W 19.000
HFL_100
Cross Section at D/S bridge location C/S data
216.8
216.6
216.4
River Bed Level(m)
216.2
216.0
215.8
215.6
215.4
215.2
0 5 10 15 20 25
Chainage(m)
6.3 Afflux / Velocity Calculation under Bridge
6.3.1 Lacey's Waterway Calculation for 100 yr flood
Adopted Design Discharge Q = 16.35 Cumecs

Regime width L= 4.8 x Q0.5 = 19.41 m
6.3.2 Orifice Formula
Q = C0 X (2g)^0.5 X L X Dd X sqrt(( h + (1 + e ) X u2 / 2g) (Ref: IRC:SP-13-2004,Cl. 15.3)

Design Discharge Q100
Lowest Bed Level at existing bridge = 215.315 m
Q target = 16.35 Cumec
Proposed No. of span = 1
C/C width of span = 10 m
No. of piers = 0
Average Piers Width = 0 m Proposed 1 x
Skew angle = 0 degree 10m Box
Total square clear width = 10.0 m type
Obstructed width L = 10.00
Unobstructed width W = 19 m
L/W = 0.526
C0 = 0.893 (Ref: IRC:SP-13-2004, Fig.15.4)
e = 1.05 (Ref: IRC:SP-13-2004, Fig.15.3)
h = 0.2 m
Dd (avg) = 0.714 m
Velocity in section u = 1.21 m/sec
Q achieved = 16.79 Cumec
h/ (under Br) = 0.28 m
v (under Br) = 2.64 m/sec
=
Adopt afflux = 0.200 m
Minimum Vertical clearance required = 0.6 m (Ref: IRC:SP-13-2004, Cl 106.2.1)

= 217.380 m
= 2.065 m

Clause 703.2 of IRC :78 -2014
dsm = 1.34 x ( Db2/Ksf)1/3
where,
Db = (Q/L) ,
3
Ksf = 1.50
( Sandy Strata)
Effective waterway L = 10.00 m
3
Floor lengths in Box Type

Provide minimum upstream apron length
= 1.5 x dsm = 2.903 m
Provide minimum Downstream apron length
= 2 x dsm = 3.871 m
(Ref: SP 13: 2004, Article 21, Raft foundation)
Depth of cutoff wall =0.30 m below dsm = EL 214.545 m

of
Major Bridge at Design Ch. 26.612 Km (Landa Nallah) on Amritsar Greenfield Road
Table of Content
1.0 Summary Sheet
2.0 Introduction
4.0 Design Approach
6.0 HFL Calculation

1. Summary Sheet
Dicken's Slope
method Synthetic Unit Hydrograph method (cumec) Area
(cumec) method
Catch- Average Design
Rational's by
Chaina ment annual Discharge
Sl. No. 100 year Discharge observed Remarks
ge (km) Area rainfall Length of Level at Equivale Discharge adopted
(sq.km) (mm) Dicken Bed Level return period (cumec) HFL/ (cumec)
Dicken Q Longest u/s of nt river by SUH
co- at Bridge rainfall for 24 water
(cumec) Stream, L Stream slope (m/ method Q
efficient (m) hr (CWC sub mark
(km) (m) Km) (cumec)
zone 1e) (cumec)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Factored
Discharge
1 26.612 80.00 600.00 11.00 294.25 20.50 218.00 212.560 0.277 240.00 207.00 70.94 95.34 143.01 adopted as
design
discharge

Vent
Chaina Total Total
Existing Min. Height At
Sl. No. ge Skew Skew Square Bed level Velocity Vertical At Pier(s) Remarks
No. of Vent Flow Area Design HFL HFL with Required Required Mean Scour Abutments
(km) Angle C/C C/C at Bridge at C/S Afflux (m) Clearance Location
Span Height (sq.m) (m) Afflux (m) Soffit level as per Depth (m) Location
(deg) Width Width (m) (m/s) (m) (m)
(m) (m) Hydrology (m)
(m) (m)
(m)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Proposed 1
span of 30
1 26.612 1 29 30.00 26.24 - 212.560 57.22 2.500 216.713 0.059 216.772 0.900 217.672 5.11 4.62 - 210.90 m with
Abutment

2.0 Introduction
The Hydrological and hydraulic calculations has been carried out for proposed Major
the alignment.
Name of Stream : Landa Nallah

CWC flood estimation Sub zone : Upper Indo- Ganga Plains subzone 1(e)
2.1 Data for Bridge Location
Name of River / Stream / Nala Chainage (Km)
Landa Nallah 26.612

Cumulative
Segmental
Sr.No. Segmental Elevation (m)
Length (m)
Length (m)
1 0 0 212.56
2 2500 2500 214
3 2500 5000 213
4 2500 7500 214
5 2500 10000 217
6 2500 12500 217
7 2500 15000 216
8 2500 17500 217
9 2500 20000 217
10 500 20500 218
Water Shed Area in Sq Km(A) 80
Watershed Length in Km (L) 20.5
Point Rainfall Value (100 years) in mm 240.000
CWC Flood Estimation Report Subzone = 1e

CWC- Flood Estimation report for Upper Indo Ganga Plains subzone 1(e)
4.0 Design Approach

from survey data.

Catchment area and main stream length has been marked on the toposheet as attached.
Discharge has been calculated using (i) Empirical method, (ii) Rational Method (iii) Slope area method
(iv) Synthetic unit hydrograph method. As per CWC guideline, for catchment area >25 sq.km,
the discharge obtained from SUH method shall be adopted.

(iii) Slope Area method
(iv) Synthetic Unit Hydrograph Method ( for Catchment area more than 25 sq. km)
Dicken's Formula
Q = CA3/4 (Ref: IRC:SP-13-2004, Cl.4.2)
Catchment Area A = 80 Sq. Km.

Coefficient C = 11
Peak Runoff in m3/s
3
Q= 294.25 m /s

Catchment Area A = 80 Sq. Km. = 8000 ha
Length of Longest River L = 20.5 Km.
Level at upstream of the stream = 218.00 m
Level at bridge location = 212.56 m
Height H = 5.44 m
100 Year Return Period rainfall for 24 hr, F = 240.000 mm

(CWC Flood Estimation Report for Sub Zone 1e)
Conversion ratio for tc hrs as per CWC Flood Estimation
Report = 0.903
tc Hr Rainfall = 216.72 mm

Permeability coefficient as per terrain condition P from
SP 13 = 0.3 (Ref: IRC:SP-13-2004, Table 4.1)
3
= 70.94 m /s


Local Enquiry HFL observed at site = 216.480 m (1.5m above avg G.L-214m )
CROSS SECTION AT BRIDGE C/L (10m D/S)
HFL _Obs 216.48
Observed Lowest Dist-
HFL B.L. ance
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m2) (m)
0 215.596 216.48 212.560 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

19.39 215.947 216.48 212.560 19.390 0.533 0.267 0.533 5.167 19.397
21.3254 214.761 216.48 212.560 1.935 1.719 1.126 1.186 2.179 2.270
22.1354 212.825 216.48 212.560 0.810 3.655 2.687 1.936 2.176 2.099
23.6834 212.56 216.48 212.560 1.548 3.920 3.788 0.265 5.863 1.571
25.0393 212.957 216.48 212.560 1.356 3.523 3.722 0.397 5.046 1.413
26.6553 213.95 216.48 212.560 1.616 2.530 3.027 0.993 4.891 1.897
38.7453 215.873 216.48 212.560 12.090 0.607 1.569 1.923 18.963 12.242
Sum = 44.286 40.888

K = (1/n) x A x R^(2/3) Keq 1168
observed HFL
Cross Section at D/S of bridge location Series1
217
217
216
River Bed Level(m)
216
215
215
214
214
213
213
212
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Chainage(m)

5.1.3.1 Calculation of channel slope

Longitudinal Section of Stream
Lowest
S.No. Distance (m)
elevation (m)
1 0 213.57
2 8.446 213.83
3 24.836 214.871
4 41.9895 214.921
5 65.6579 213.579
6 80.3702 214.093
7 96.2481 212.56
8 107.4153 212.965
9 127.8999 213.094
10 133.9499 213.316
11 154.9829 213.115
12 166.2629 213.74
y = -0.0066x + 214.19
Stream Slope R² = 0.271
216
Series1 Linear (Series1)
215.5
215
214.5
214
213.5
213
212.5
212
211.5
211
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Slope of channel(1 in ..) = 1/0.0066 = 152

5.1.4 Synthetic Unit Hydrograph Method

A. Computation of Stream Slope for River
Equivalent Stream Slope method is used for calculation the slope of the stream
River Name : Landa Nallah
Length of River : 20.50 km

Reduced Height
Segment
Distance Segment above Li * (Di +
Sl No. Reduced Level Length Di + Di-1
from Pt. of Length datum, Di-1)
Li
study Di
m m m km m m km.m
1 0 212.56 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 2500 214 2500 2.50 1.44 1.44 3.60
3 5000 213 2500 2.50 0.44 1.88 4.70
4 7500 214 2500 2.50 1.44 1.88 4.70
5 10000 217 2500 2.50 4.44 5.88 14.70
6 12500 217 2500 2.50 4.44 8.88 22.20
7 15000 216 2500 2.50 3.44 7.88 19.70
8 17500 217 2500 2.50 4.44 7.88 19.70
9 20000 217 2500 2.50 4.44 8.88 22.20
10 20500 218 500 0.50 5.44 9.88 4.94
Total 20.50 116.44
Equivalent River Slope = Σ Li * (Di + Di-1) / L2

= ( 116.44 / 20.5^2) = 0.277 m / Km
B. Calculations for 1 Hr. Synthetic Unit Hydrograph
1 Catchment Area, A = 80.00 Sq.Km.
CWC Subzone = 1e
Length of Main stream, L = 20.50 Km.
Equivalent Stream Slope S = 0.277 m / Km
L/S = 73.988
L / (sqrt(S)) = 38.945
Therefore, following relationships have been used for estimating 2-hr unit hydrograph parameter of the said catchment.
2 UG Runoff Vol. = Area under UG = Area*1cm 800000 m3

tp = 1.858 / (qp)1.038 10.503 hr,
Adopt 11.000 hr,
qp = 2.030/(L/Sqrt(s))0.649 0.188 Cumec/sq.km
Qp= qp xA 15.08 Cumec

Unit Duration (tr)= 2.00 hr
Time from rise to peak

12.00 hr
(Tm)= tp+tr/2
TB = 7.744 (tp)0.779 50.14 hr
Adopt 50.0 hr
0.990
W50= 2.217 /(qp) 11.57 hr
W75= 1.477/ (qp)0.876 6.371 hr
WR-50= 0.812/ (qp)0.907 3.689 hr
WR-75= 0.606/(qp)0.791 2.268 hr
TD= 1.1 tp 12.100 hr, Say 12.00 hr

Base Flow = 0.05 Cumec/SqKm
Loss Rate = 0.60 cm/hr

C. Development of Synthetic Unit Hydrograph
Synthetic Unit Hydrograph

20
18
16
14
Discharge (cumecs)
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
Time (hr)

D. Development of 1cm Unit Hydrograph

U.G ordinates
UGH
Time (Hr) Ordinate
(cumec)
0 0
2 1.5
4 3
6 4.5
8 6.5
10 10
12 14.54
14 12.5
16 10.5
18 8
20 6.5
22 6
24 5.3
26 4.7
28 4
30 3.5
32 3
34 2.5
36 2
38 1.2
40 0.7
42 0.2
44 0.1
46 0.1
48 0.1
50 0.17
Total (Cumec)= 111.11
(Qi)=(A*d)/(tr*0.36) = 111.11
d= 1 cm

E. Estimation of 100 years Return Period Flood
100 year flood discharge shall be considered for designing waterway
a. For Design Hydrograph
100-year TD - hr Point Rainfall (From Charts)

100-year 24 - hr Point Rainfall : 240 mm
Conversion Factor for 12 hr 0.84

100-year 12.000 - hr Point Rainfall : 20.16 cm
Conversion Factor for areal reduction 0.948 A = 80 sq. km
100-year 12.000 - hr Areal Rainfall : 19.11 cm

Loss Rate = 0.6 cm / hr
(Ref. - Flood Estimation Report for SubZones 1 e - CWC)
Calculation of 100-year
( From % Rainfall vs % Time Graph)
Effective Rainfall
Rainfall Hourly
Cumulative R.F. Loss Rate
hr % hr % Rainfall increment Effective
increment (cm) (cm/hr)
(cm) Rainfall (cm)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
2 16.7% 54.0% 10.32 10.32 0.60 9.72
4 33.3% 73.0% 13.95 3.63 0.60 3.03
6 50.0% 82.0% 15.67 1.72 0.60 1.12
8 66.7% 90.0% 17.20 1.53 0.60 0.93
9 75.0% 95.0% 18.15 0.96 0.60 0.36
10 83.3% 97.0% 18.54 0.38 0.60 0.00
11 91.7% 99.0% 18.92 0.38 0.60 0.00
12 100.0% 100.0% 19.11 0.19 0.60 0.00
Total 19.110

b. 100-Year Peak Flood
Direct
UG Ordinates Effective Rainfall
Time(Hr) Runoff
(cumecs) (cm)
(cumec)
12 14.540 9.72 141.32
14 12.500 3.03 37.89
16 10.500 1.12 11.76
10 10.000 0.93 9.29
18 8 0.36 2.84
20 6.5 0.00 0.00
Total Runoff (cumec) = 203.10

Base Flow (cumec) = 4.00
Peak Flow = Total Runoff + Base Flow (cumec) 207.00
Hence, 100 year flood peak = 207.00 Cumecs

Discharge by Dicken's method = 294.25 m3/s ( Not applicable)
Discharge by Rational method = 70.94 m3/s ( Not applicable)
Discharge by Observed HFL = 95.34 m3/s
Discharge by SUH Method = 207.00 m3/s
Hence, Peak Design Discharge = 1.5x 95.34 = 143.01 m3/s
Note: Dicken's and Rational are suitable for small catchment area, Hence ignored. Comparision
between Slope area and SUH has been made. Also, the area within the catchment area has well
defined irrigation and drainage basin plans, Hence, Flood water shall not directly reaches to bridge
location and having much more time to peak.

3
HFL _100 216.713 Q100= 143.01 m /s
Min.
Natural
HFL
B.L.
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m2) (m)
0.00 215.60 216.713 212.560 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
10.00 215.78 216.713 212.560 10.000 0.936 0.468 0.936 4.678 10.044
15.00 215.87 216.713 212.560 5.000 0.845 0.890 0.091 4.452 5.001
19.39 215.95 216.713 212.560 4.390 0.766 0.805 0.079 3.536 4.391
20.00 215.57 216.713 212.560 0.610 1.140 0.953 0.374 0.581 0.715
21.33 214.76 216.713 212.560 1.325 1.952 1.546 0.812 2.049 1.554
22.14 212.83 216.713 212.560 0.810 3.888 2.920 1.936 2.365 2.099
23.68 212.56 216.713 212.560 1.548 4.153 4.021 0.265 6.224 1.571
25.04 212.96 216.713 212.560 1.356 3.756 3.955 0.397 5.362 1.413
26.66 213.95 216.713 212.560 1.616 2.763 3.260 0.993 5.267 1.897
35.00 215.28 216.713 212.560 8.345 1.436 2.099 1.327 17.519 8.450
38.75 215.873 216.713 212.560 3.745 0.840 1.138 0.596 4.262 3.792
40.00 216.0726 216.713 212.560 1.255 0.640 0.740 0.200 0.929 1.270
Sum = 57.22 42.196

K = (1/n) x A x R^(2/3) Keq 1752.73
Calc. discharge (Cumec) Q 143.11

Cross Section at bridge location HFL
CS Data
217
217
216
216
River Bed Level(m)
215
215
214
214
213
213
212
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Chainage(m)

7 Afflux / Velocity Calculation under Bridge

Regime width L= 4.8 x Q0.5 L 57.40 m

Proposed 1 span of 30 m with Abutment
Proposed span = 1 x 30 m
Skew angle = 29 degree
Total Skew clear width = 26.2 m
Afflux, h= ( ( v2 / 17.88 ) + 0.015) ( ( A / A1 )2 - 1 )

Where

Minimum Vertical clearance required = 0.9 m

= 217.672 m
= 5.112 m

8 Scour Calculation
Clause 703.2 of IRC :78 -2000
dsm = 1.34 x ( Db2/Ksf)1/3
where,
Db = (Q/L) ,
3
Ksf = 1.00
Fine Sand Strata
Effective waterway L = 29 m
3
= 1.27 x dsm = 5.873 m
= 2 x dsm = - m
Max. scour level for abutment = 210.899 m

Max. scour level for pier = - m
Scour depth below abutment w.r.t bed level = 1.661 m

Scour depth below pier w.r.t bed level = - m

9. Catchment Area with Stream Line

Delhi-Katra-Expressway (Amritsar Connectivity) Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis

of
Minor Bridge cum SVUP at Ch. 30+656 Km (Water Body)
The alignment is crossing at Water Body. MNB cum SVUP of 1 x 40 m is proposed.However, Because of the waterbody existance, no hydrology is required.
View of Water Body-->

Delhi- Katra Project Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis

of
Major Bridge at Design Ch. 38.205 km (Beas River)
Table of Content
1.0 Summary Sheet
2.0 Introduction
4.0 Design Approach
6.0 HFL Calculation
Delhi - Katra Project Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis
1. Summary Sheet
Sl. No. Chaina Catch- Average Outflow Flood Discharge of Shah Design Discharge By Catchment Observed discharge Design Remarks
ge (km) ment annual Discharge from Nahar Barrage (cumec) Area Basis (cumec) Q by water marks on Discharge
Area rainfall adopted
Pong Dam nearest bridge
(sq.km) (mm) (cumec)
(Cumec) (cumec)
Observed Observed
HFL by discharge Q
water mark by Area-
on nearest velocity
bridge method
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Varies
Maximum
from 600 discharge
to from Slope
1 38.205 - 3000mm 12375.00 11043.00 13447.585 220.000 15969.05 15969.05 area method
plain to is considered
as design
hilly
discharge
region

Vent
Chaina Total Total
Existing Nevigational Min. Height At
Sl. No. ge Skew Skew Square Bed level Velocity Mean At Pier(s) Remarks
No. of Vent Flow Area Design HFL HFL with Vertical Required Required Abutments
(km) Angle C/C C/C at Bridge at C/S Afflux (m) Scour Location
Span Height (sq.m) (m) Afflux (m) Clearance Soffit level as per Location
(deg) Width Width (m) (m/s) Depth (m) (m)
(m) (m) (m) Hydrology (m)
(m) (m)
(m)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Proposed
Cable
arrangement
with other
1 38.205 20 0 ###### 2140.0 - 206.941 6447.67 2.147 220.025 0.002 220.027 4.000 224.027 17.09 For Details refer scour Calculation sheet
spans of 1 x
300 + 1 x 700 +
1 x 300 + 9 x 50
+6 x 60 m
2.0 Introduction
The Hydrological and hydraulic calculations has been carried out for proposed major
bridge at ch.38.205 Km to justify the waterway required for the stream crossing
the alignment.
Name of Stream : Beas River

Upper Indo Ganga Plains subzone 1 ( e) &
CWC flood estimation Sub zone : Western Himalaya Sub zone 7
Normal Annual Rainfall in mm : Varies from 600 to 3000mm plain to hilly region

CWC- Flood Estimation report for Upper Indo Ganga Plains subzone 1 ( e) & Western Himalaya Sub zone 7
4.0 Design Approch

from survey data.
Catchment area upto Proposed bridge location is 15901 sq. Km within india. Since catchment area is more than
5000 sq km synthetic unit hydrograph method is not applicable. Therefore, design discharge has been
calculated using existing dam data & barrage data located in U/S. There are two irrigation/power house schemes
in U/S. Pong Dam is 155 Km U/S,Shah Nehar Barrage is just D/S of Pong Dam from proposed bridge location.
Design Spill Discharge of Pong Dam is 12375 cumec, Design Flood Discharge of Shah Nehar Barrage is 11043
cumec.Salient Features of these schemes is annexed in the report.The Pong Dam discharge data is interpolated
based on the catchment and worked out the anticipated discharge at proposed bridge location.For the slope
area method,cross section based on the observed HFL at Local enquiry taken on guide bund road crossing at
ch. 36.540 which was touched in 1988 flood ( HFL level- 220.00m). Flood discharge estimated using these
method compared & highest of these adopted as design discharge.

Fixing of Design Discharge on Catchment Area Basis
Where,
QDS = Design Flood at Proposed Bridge Location
QGD = Design Flood at Pong Dam = 11043 cumec
Catchment area upto Proposed Bridge =
CADS =
Location 16333 Sq. Km.
CAGD = Catchment area upto Pong Dam = 12560 Sq. Km.
QDS = 11043 X (16333/12560)^0.75
= 13447.59 cumecs

( Upto Guide Bund top level at ch.
Local Enquiry HFL observed at site = 220 m 36.540 km)
CROSS SECTION AT BRIDGE C/L
HFL _Obs 220
Offset Observed Lowest Dist-
as C/L HFL B.L. ance
(Km) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m2) (m)
37.300 0.000 217.101 220 206.941 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
37.320 20.000 217.172 220 206.941 20.000 2.828 1.414 2.828 28.280 20.199
37.340 40.000 216.996 220 206.941 20.000 3.004 2.916 0.176 58.320 20.001
37.360 60.000 216.894 220 206.941 20.000 3.106 3.055 0.102 61.100 20.000
37.380 80.000 216.856 220 206.941 20.000 3.144 3.125 0.038 62.500 20.000
37.400 100.000 216.754 220 206.941 20.000 3.246 3.195 0.102 63.900 20.000
37.420 120.000 216.804 220 206.941 20.000 3.196 3.221 0.050 64.420 20.000
37.440 140.000 216.75 220 206.941 20.000 3.250 3.223 0.054 64.460 20.000
37.460 160.000 216.601 220 206.941 20.000 3.399 3.325 0.149 66.490 20.001
37.480 180.000 216.552 220 206.941 20.000 3.448 3.424 0.049 68.470 20.000
37.500 200.000 217.658 220 206.941 20.000 2.342 2.895 1.106 57.900 20.031
37.520 220.000 217.74 220 206.941 20.000 2.260 2.301 0.082 46.020 20.000
37.540 240.000 217.738 220 206.941 20.000 2.262 2.261 0.002 45.220 20.000
37.560 260.000 217.69 220 206.941 20.000 2.310 2.286 0.048 45.720 20.000
37.580 280.000 218.347 220 206.941 20.000 1.653 1.982 0.657 39.630 20.011
37.600 300.000 217.907 220 206.941 20.000 2.093 1.873 0.440 37.460 20.005
37.620 320.000 217.622 220 206.941 20.000 2.378 2.235 0.285 44.710 20.002
37.640 340.000 217.909 220 206.941 20.000 2.091 2.235 0.287 44.690 20.002
37.660 360.000 218.44 220 206.941 20.000 1.560 1.826 0.531 36.510 20.007
37.680 380.000 217.403 220 206.941 20.000 2.597 2.079 1.037 41.570 20.027
37.700 400.000 216.549 220 206.941 20.000 3.451 3.024 0.854 60.480 20.018
37.720 420.000 216.524 220 206.941 20.000 3.476 3.464 0.025 69.270 20.000
37.740 440.000 216.582 220 206.941 20.000 3.418 3.447 0.058 68.940 20.000
37.760 460.000 218.961 220 206.941 20.000 1.039 2.229 2.379 44.570 20.141
37.780 480.000 220.572 220 206.941 20.000 0.000 0.519 1.039 10.390 20.027
37.800 500.000 216.496 220 206.941 20.000 3.504 1.752 3.504 35.040 20.305
37.820 520.000 216.578 220 206.941 20.000 3.422 3.463 0.082 69.260 20.000
37.840 540.000 216.624 220 206.941 20.000 3.376 3.399 0.046 67.980 20.000
37.860 560.000 216.631 220 206.941 20.000 3.369 3.373 0.007 67.450 20.000
37.880 580.000 216.648 220 206.941 20.000 3.352 3.361 0.017 67.210 20.000
37.900 600.000 216.757 220 206.941 20.000 3.243 3.298 0.109 65.950 20.000
37.920 620.000 216.89 220 206.941 20.000 3.110 3.177 0.133 63.530 20.000
37.940 640.000 216.999 220 206.941 20.000 3.001 3.056 0.109 61.110 20.000
37.960 660.000 218.325 220 206.941 20.000 1.675 2.338 1.326 46.760 20.044
37.980 680.000 217.346 220 206.941 20.000 2.654 2.165 0.979 43.290 20.024
38.000 700.000 217.403 220 206.941 20.000 2.597 2.626 0.057 52.510 20.000
38.020 720.000 217.414 220 206.941 20.000 2.586 2.592 0.011 51.830 20.000
38.040 740.000 217.243 220 206.941 20.000 2.757 2.672 0.171 53.430 20.001
38.060 760.000 217.398 220 206.941 20.000 2.602 2.680 0.155 53.590 20.001
38.080 780.000 217.298 220 206.941 20.000 2.702 2.652 0.100 53.040 20.000
38.100 800.000 218.028 220 206.941 20.000 1.972 2.337 0.730 46.740 20.013
38.120 820.000 217.892 220 206.941 20.000 2.108 2.040 0.136 40.800 20.000
38.140 840.000 216.797 220 206.941 20.000 3.203 2.656 1.095 53.110 20.030
38.160 860.000 217.155 220 206.941 20.000 2.845 3.024 0.358 60.480 20.003
38.180 880.000 217.19 220 206.941 20.000 2.810 2.828 0.035 56.550 20.000
38.200 900.000 217.151 220 206.941 20.000 2.849 2.830 0.039 56.590 20.000
38.220 920.000 217.098 220 206.941 20.000 2.902 2.875 0.053 57.510 20.000
38.240 940.000 217.018 220 206.941 20.000 2.982 2.942 0.080 58.840 20.000
38.260 960.000 217.003 220 206.941 20.000 2.997 2.990 0.015 59.790 20.000
38.280 980.000 216.966 220 206.941 20.000 3.034 3.016 0.037 60.310 20.000
38.300 1000.000 216.968 220 206.941 20.000 3.032 3.033 0.002 60.660 20.000
38.320 1020.000 216.969 220 206.941 20.000 3.031 3.032 0.001 60.630 20.000
38.340 1040.000 216.939 220 206.941 20.000 3.061 3.046 0.030 60.920 20.000
38.360 1060.000 216.931 220 206.941 20.000 3.069 3.065 0.008 61.300 20.000
38.380 1080.000 216.809 220 206.941 20.000 3.191 3.130 0.122 62.600 20.000
38.400 1100.000 217.374 220 206.941 20.000 2.626 2.909 0.565 58.170 20.008
38.420 1120.000 217.463 220 206.941 20.000 2.537 2.582 0.089 51.630 20.000
38.440 1140.000 217.357 220 206.941 20.000 2.643 2.590 0.106 51.800 20.000
38.460 1160.000 217.662 220 206.941 20.000 2.338 2.491 0.305 49.810 20.002
38.480 1180.000 217.764 220 206.941 20.000 2.236 2.287 0.102 45.740 20.000
38.500 1200.000 217.987 220 206.941 20.000 2.013 2.125 0.223 42.490 20.001
38.520 1220.000 217.834 220 206.941 20.000 2.166 2.090 0.153 41.790 20.001
38.540 1240.000 218.027 220 206.941 20.000 1.973 2.070 0.193 41.390 20.001
38.560 1260.000 218.332 220 206.941 20.000 1.668 1.821 0.305 36.410 20.002
38.563 1263.044 218.661 220 206.941 3.044 1.339 1.504 0.329 4.577 3.062
38.566 1265.528 217.341 220 206.941 2.484 2.659 1.999 1.320 4.966 2.813
38.575 1275.100 217.204 220 206.941 9.572 2.796 2.727 0.137 26.108 9.573
38.593 1293.038 217.487 220 206.941 17.938 2.513 2.655 0.283 47.616 17.940
38.595 1294.978 217.85 220 206.941 1.940 2.150 2.332 0.363 4.523 1.974
38.615 1315.269 218.546 220 206.941 20.291 1.454 1.802 0.696 36.564 20.303
38.635 1335.000 218.931 220 206.941 19.731 1.069 1.262 0.385 24.891 19.735
38.655 1355.000 218.066 220 206.941 20.000 1.934 1.501 0.865 30.030 20.019
38.675 1375.000 219.387 220 206.941 20.000 0.613 1.274 1.321 25.470 20.044
38.681 1381.112 217.985 220 206.941 6.112 2.015 1.314 1.402 8.031 6.271
38.700 1400.000 210.5 220 206.941 18.888 9.500 5.757 7.485 108.748 20.317
38.750 1450.000 208.5 220 206.941 50.000 11.500 10.500 2.000 525.000 50.040
38.800 1500.000 206.941 220 206.941 50.000 13.059 12.280 1.559 613.975 50.024
38.850 1550.000 208 220 206.941 50.000 12.000 12.530 1.059 626.475 50.011
38.900 1600.000 210 220 206.941 50.000 10.000 11.000 2.000 550.000 50.040
38.918 1618.250 217.976 220 206.941 18.250 2.024 6.012 7.976 109.719 19.917
38.934 1633.683 217.798 220 206.941 15.433 2.202 2.113 0.178 32.610 15.434
38.960 1660.000 217.939 220 206.941 26.317 2.061 2.132 0.141 56.095 26.317
38.980 1680.000 218.279 220 206.941 20.000 1.721 1.891 0.340 37.820 20.003
39.000 1700.000 218.122 220 206.941 20.000 1.878 1.799 0.157 35.990 20.001
39.020 1720.000 218.236 220 206.941 20.000 1.764 1.821 0.114 36.420 20.000
39.040 1740.000 218.399 220 206.941 20.000 1.601 1.683 0.163 33.650 20.001
39.060 1760.000 218.506 220 206.941 20.000 1.494 1.548 0.107 30.950 20.000
39.080 1780.000 220.87 220 206.941 20.000 0.000 0.747 1.494 14.940 20.056
39.100 1800.000 219.028 220 206.941 20.000 0.972 0.486 0.972 9.720 20.024
39.120 1820.000 220.577 220 206.941 20.000 0.000 0.486 0.972 9.720 20.024
39.140 1840.000 220.572 220 206.941 20.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
39.160 1860.000 220.701 220 206.941 20.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
39.180 1880.000 220.412 220 206.941 20.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
39.200 1900.000 220.453 220 206.941 20.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
39.220 1920.000 221.244 220 206.941 20.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
39.240 1940.000 220.395 220 206.941 20.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
39.260 1960.000 220.115 220 206.941 20.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
39.280 1980.000 220.192 220 206.941 20.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
39.300 2000.000 220.081 220 206.941 20.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Sum = 6403.667 1824.852
K = (1/n) x A x R^(2/3) Keq 422501
observed HFL
Cross Section at C/L of bridge location Series1
222
220
218
River Bed Level(m)
216
214
212
210
208
206
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Chainage(m)
5.1.4 Calculation of channel slope

Longitudinal Section of Stream at bridge location
Distance Lowest
S.No.
(m) elevation (m)
1 0 206.941
2 92.46 206.841
3 167.814 206.748
4 308.634 206.784
5 372.114 206.139
6 517.246 206.079
7 555.608 205.665
8 977.122 205.258
9
Stream Slope at Br. Location

207.5 Series1 Linear (Series1)
207 y = -0.0019x + 207.01

R² = 0.9032
206.5
206
205.5
205
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Slope of channel(1 in ..) = 1/0.0019= 526

5.1.5 Salient features of Pong Dam

Sources: http://india-wris.nrsc.gov.in/wrpinfo/index.php?title=Pong_Dam_D00579
Details of Pong Dam Project are given below:
Design Spillway capacity of Pong Dam = 12375 cumec

5.1.6. Salient features of Shah Nehar Barrage

Sources: http://india-wris.nrsc.gov.in/wrpinfo/index.php?title=Shahnehar_Barrage_B00706
Details of Shah Nehar Barrage are given below:
Design Flood discharge of Shahnehar Barrage = 11043 cumec

Delhi - Katra Project

Outflow discharge of Pong Dam = 12375.00 m3/s
Flood discharge of Shah Nahar Barrage = 11043.00 m3/s
Discharge by Slope area method = 15969.05 m3/s
Discharge by Catchment area basis = 13447.59 m3/s
3
Hence, Peak Design Discharge = 15969.05 m /s
3
HFL _100 220.025 Q100= 15969.05 m /s
Min.
Offset as Natural
C/L HFL
B.L.
(Km) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m2) (m)
37.300 0.000 217.101 220.025 206.941 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
37.320 20.000 217.172 220.025 206.941 20.000 2.853 1.427 2.853 28.530 20.202
37.340 40.000 216.996 220.025 206.941 20.000 3.029 2.941 0.176 58.820 20.001
37.360 60.000 216.894 220.025 206.941 20.000 3.131 3.080 0.102 61.600 20.000
37.380 80.000 216.856 220.025 206.941 20.000 3.169 3.150 0.038 63.000 20.000
37.400 100.000 216.754 220.025 206.941 20.000 3.271 3.220 0.102 64.400 20.000
37.420 120.000 216.804 220.025 206.941 20.000 3.221 3.246 0.050 64.920 20.000
37.440 140.000 216.750 220.025 206.941 20.000 3.275 3.248 0.054 64.960 20.000
37.460 160.000 216.601 220.025 206.941 20.000 3.424 3.350 0.149 66.990 20.001
37.480 180.000 216.552 220.025 206.941 20.000 3.473 3.449 0.049 68.970 20.000
37.500 200.000 217.658 220.025 206.941 20.000 2.367 2.920 1.106 58.400 20.031
37.520 220.000 217.74 220.025 206.941 20.000 2.285 2.326 0.082 46.520 20.000
37.540 240.000 217.738 220.025 206.941 20.000 2.287 2.286 0.002 45.720 20.000
37.560 260.000 217.69 220.025 206.941 20.000 2.335 2.311 0.048 46.220 20.000
37.580 280.000 218.347 220.025 206.941 20.000 1.678 2.007 0.657 40.130 20.011
37.600 300.000 217.907 220.025 206.941 20.000 2.118 1.898 0.440 37.960 20.005
37.620 320.000 217.622 220.025 206.941 20.000 2.403 2.260 0.285 45.210 20.002
37.640 340.000 217.909 220.025 206.941 20.000 2.116 2.260 0.287 45.190 20.002
37.660 360.000 218.44 220.025 206.941 20.000 1.585 1.851 0.531 37.010 20.007
37.680 380.000 217.403 220.025 206.941 20.000 2.622 2.104 1.037 42.070 20.027
37.700 400.000 216.549 220.025 206.941 20.000 3.476 3.049 0.854 60.980 20.018
37.720 420.000 216.524 220.025 206.941 20.000 3.501 3.489 0.025 69.770 20.000
37.740 440.000 216.582 220.025 206.941 20.000 3.443 3.472 0.058 69.440 20.000
37.760 460.000 218.961 220.025 206.941 20.000 1.064 2.254 2.379 45.070 20.141
37.780 480.000 220.572 220.025 206.941 20.000 0.000 0.532 1.064 10.640 20.028
37.800 500.000 216.496 220.025 206.941 20.000 3.529 1.765 3.529 35.290 20.309
37.820 520.000 216.578 220.025 206.941 20.000 3.447 3.488 0.082 69.760 20.000
37.840 540.000 216.624 220.025 206.941 20.000 3.401 3.424 0.046 68.480 20.000
37.860 560.000 216.631 220.025 206.941 20.000 3.394 3.398 0.007 67.950 20.000
37.880 580.000 216.648 220.025 206.941 20.000 3.377 3.386 0.017 67.710 20.000
37.900 600.000 216.757 220.025 206.941 20.000 3.268 3.323 0.109 66.450 20.000
37.920 620.000 216.89 220.025 206.941 20.000 3.135 3.202 0.133 64.030 20.000
37.940 640.000 216.999 220.025 206.941 20.000 3.026 3.081 0.109 61.610 20.000
37.960 660.000 218.325 220.025 206.941 20.000 1.700 2.363 1.326 47.260 20.044
37.980 680.000 217.346 220.025 206.941 20.000 2.679 2.190 0.979 43.790 20.024
38.000 700.000 217.403 220.025 206.941 20.000 2.622 2.651 0.057 53.010 20.000
38.020 720.000 217.414 220.025 206.941 20.000 2.611 2.617 0.011 52.330 20.000
38.040 740.000 217.243 220.025 206.941 20.000 2.782 2.697 0.171 53.930 20.001

38.060 760.000 217.398 220.025 206.941 20.000 2.627 2.705 0.155 54.090 20.001
38.080 780.000 217.298 220.025 206.941 20.000 2.727 2.677 0.100 53.540 20.000
38.100 800.000 218.028 220.025 206.941 20.000 1.997 2.362 0.730 47.240 20.013
38.120 820.000 217.892 220.025 206.941 20.000 2.133 2.065 0.136 41.300 20.000
38.140 840.000 216.797 220.025 206.941 20.000 3.228 2.681 1.095 53.610 20.030
38.160 860.000 217.155 220.025 206.941 20.000 2.870 3.049 0.358 60.980 20.003
38.180 880.000 217.19 220.025 206.941 20.000 2.835 2.853 0.035 57.050 20.000
38.200 900.000 217.151 220.025 206.941 20.000 2.874 2.855 0.039 57.090 20.000
38.220 920.000 217.098 220.025 206.941 20.000 2.927 2.900 0.053 58.010 20.000
38.240 940.000 217.018 220.025 206.941 20.000 3.007 2.967 0.080 59.340 20.000
38.260 960.000 217.003 220.025 206.941 20.000 3.022 3.015 0.015 60.290 20.000
38.280 980.000 216.966 220.025 206.941 20.000 3.059 3.041 0.037 60.810 20.000
38.300 1000.000 216.968 220.025 206.941 20.000 3.057 3.058 0.002 61.160 20.000
38.320 1020.000 216.969 220.025 206.941 20.000 3.056 3.057 0.001 61.130 20.000
38.340 1040.000 216.939 220.025 206.941 20.000 3.086 3.071 0.030 61.420 20.000
38.360 1060.000 216.931 220.025 206.941 20.000 3.094 3.090 0.008 61.800 20.000
38.380 1080.000 216.809 220.025 206.941 20.000 3.216 3.155 0.122 63.100 20.000
38.400 1100.000 217.374 220.025 206.941 20.000 2.651 2.934 0.565 58.670 20.008
38.420 1120.000 217.463 220.025 206.941 20.000 2.562 2.607 0.089 52.130 20.000
38.440 1140.000 217.357 220.025 206.941 20.000 2.668 2.615 0.106 52.300 20.000
38.460 1160.000 217.662 220.025 206.941 20.000 2.363 2.516 0.305 50.310 20.002
38.480 1180.000 217.764 220.025 206.941 20.000 2.261 2.312 0.102 46.240 20.000
38.500 1200.000 217.987 220.025 206.941 20.000 2.038 2.150 0.223 42.990 20.001
38.520 1220.000 217.834 220.025 206.941 20.000 2.191 2.115 0.153 42.290 20.001
38.540 1240.000 218.027 220.025 206.941 20.000 1.998 2.095 0.193 41.890 20.001
38.560 1260.000 218.332 220.025 206.941 20.000 1.693 1.846 0.305 36.910 20.002
38.563 1263.044 218.661 220.025 206.941 3.044 1.364 1.529 0.329 4.653 3.062
38.566 1265.528 217.341 220.025 206.941 2.484 2.684 2.024 1.320 5.028 2.813
38.575 1275.100 217.204 220.025 206.941 9.572 2.821 2.753 0.137 26.347 9.573
38.593 1293.038 217.487 220.025 206.941 17.938 2.538 2.680 0.283 48.065 17.940
38.595 1294.978 217.85 220.025 206.941 1.940 2.175 2.357 0.363 4.572 1.974
38.615 1315.269 218.546 220.025 206.941 20.291 1.479 1.827 0.696 37.072 20.303
38.635 1335.000 218.931 220.025 206.941 19.731 1.094 1.287 0.385 25.384 19.735
38.655 1355.000 218.066 220.025 206.941 20.000 1.959 1.527 0.865 30.530 20.019
38.675 1375.000 219.387 220.025 206.941 20.000 0.638 1.299 1.321 25.970 20.044
38.681 1381.112 217.985 220.025 206.941 6.112 2.040 1.339 1.402 8.184 6.271
38.700 1400.000 210.5 220.025 206.941 18.888 9.525 5.783 7.485 109.220 20.317
38.750 1450.000 208.5 220.025 206.941 50.000 11.525 10.525 2.000 526.250 50.040
38.800 1500.000 206.941 220.025 206.941 50.000 13.084 12.305 1.559 615.225 50.024
38.850 1550.000 208 220.025 206.941 50.000 12.025 12.555 1.059 627.725 50.011
38.900 1600.000 210 220.025 206.941 50.000 10.025 11.025 2.000 551.250 50.040
38.918 1618.250 217.976 220.025 206.941 18.250 2.049 6.037 7.976 110.175 19.917
38.934 1633.683 217.798 220.025 206.941 15.433 2.227 2.138 0.178 32.996 15.434
38.960 1660.000 217.939 220.025 206.941 26.317 2.086 2.157 0.141 56.753 26.317
38.980 1680.000 218.279 220.025 206.941 20.000 1.746 1.916 0.340 38.320 20.003
39.000 1700.000 218.122 220.025 206.941 20.000 1.903 1.825 0.157 36.490 20.001
39.020 1720.000 218.236 220.025 206.941 20.000 1.789 1.846 0.114 36.920 20.000
39.040 1740.000 218.399 220.025 206.941 20.000 1.626 1.708 0.163 34.150 20.001
39.060 1760.000 218.506 220.025 206.941 20.000 1.519 1.573 0.107 31.450 20.000
39.080 1780.000 220.87 220.025 206.941 20.000 0.000 0.760 1.519 15.190 20.058
39.100 1800.000 219.028 220.025 206.941 20.000 0.997 0.499 0.997 9.970 20.025
39.120 1820.000 220.577 220.025 206.941 20.000 0.000 0.499 0.997 9.970 20.025
39.140 1840.000 220.572 220.025 206.941 20.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
39.160 1860.000 220.701 220.025 206.941 20.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
39.180 1880.000 220.412 220.025 206.941 20.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
39.200 1900.000 220.453 220.025 206.941 20.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
39.220 1920.000 221.244 220.025 206.941 20.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
39.240 1940.000 220.395 220.025 206.941 20.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
39.260 1960.000 220.115 220.025 206.941 20.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
39.280 1980.000 220.192 220.025 206.941 20.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
39.300 2000.000 220.081 220.025 206.941 20.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Sum = 6447.67 1824.865

Refer table below for Calc. discharge (Cumec) Q 15970.84
compartmentwise discharge Max. depth below HFL (m) Dd (max) 13.084
calculations) Unobstructed width W 2000.000
Discharges into Compatments

Name of
Mean
From Manning Channel Discharg Discharge
To offset Area Perimeter Hydrauli Velocity
Offset Value slope e Compartment-
c Radius
wise
(m) (m) (m^2) (m) (m) (Const.) (m/m) (m/sec) (Cumecs) (Cumecs)
37.300 38.480 3225.730 1180.915 2.732 0.050 0.00143 1.477 4764.843 Q1
38.480 38.900 2809.553 422.170 6.655 0.035 0.00143 3.821 10734.625 Q2
38.900 39.300 412.384 221.780 1.859 0.050 0.00143 1.143 471.377 Q3
Sum = 6447.667 1824.865 15970.845
Average Velocity- 2.15
HFL
Cross Section at bridge location
CS Data
222.00
220.00
218.00
River Bed Level(m)
216.00
214.00
212.00
210.00
208.00
206.00
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Chainage(m)

7 Afflux Calculation under Bridge

0.5
Regime width L= 4.8 x Q L 606.57 m

Proposed Cable arrangement with other spans of 1 x 300 + 1 x 700 + 1 x 300 + 9 x 50 +6 x 60 m
Proposed total span = 2140 m
Afflux, h= ( ( v2 / 17.88 ) + 0.015) ( ( A / A1 )2 - 1 )

Where

Minimum Vertical clearance required = 4 m ( Navigational vent height)

Minimum soffit level required = 220.027 + 4
= 224.027 m
= 17.086 m
8 Scour Calculation
Clause 703.2 of IRC :78 -2000
dsm = 1.34 x ( Db2/Ksf)1/3
where,
Db = (Q/L) ,
Design Discharge Q = 15969.05 m3/s

HFL Calculated = 220.027 220.027 220.027 m
Lowest bed level/ Ground Level at bridge = 216.496 206.941 218.236 m
Ksf = 1.00 1.00 1.00
(For Fine sand Strata considered)
Discharge in Each Compartment Q1 Q2 Q3
= 4764.843 10734.63 471.3766
Effective waterway L = 1185.5 490 398 m
3
Increase in design discharge by 17.89% (Q) = 5617.3 12655.0 555.7 m /s
Db = Q/L = 4.738 25.827 1.396 Cumec/m
Mean Scour Depth dsm = 3.780 11.708 1.674 m
= 1.27 x dsm = 4.801 - 2.126 m
= 2 x dsm = 7.561 23.416 3.348 m
Max. scour level for abutment = 215.226 - 217.901 m
Max. scour level for pier = 212.466 196.611 216.679 m
Scour depth below abutment w.r.t bed level = 1.270 - -1.405 m

Scour depth below pier w.r.t bed level = 4.030 19.885 -0.183 m
Consultancy services for preparation Delhi - Katra Project Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis
9. Catchment Area with Stream Lines on Bhuvan web of ISRO Geospacial
Catchment area within India upto Pong Dam

( From Records)
= 12560 sqkm
Consultancy services for preparation Delhi - Katra Project Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis
Catchment area inbetween proposed bridge

& Pong Dam
= 3772.559 sqkm
Thus Catchment area upto Bridge Location
=12560 + 3773
= 16333 sqkm

Hydrology Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Hydrology Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Detailed Project Report

Construction of four-lane Greenfield

for National Highways Authority of India

Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis

1 of 16 Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis

Summary of Hydraulic Studies of Bridge

2 of 16 Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis

Name of Stream : West or Black Bein Nalla

2.1 Data for Bridge Location

Name of River / Stream / Nala Chainage (Km)

West or Black Bein Nalla 22.345

3.0 Codes & References

4.0 Design Approach

3 of 16 Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis

5.0 Hydrological Calculation

Catchment Area A = 2509 Sq. Km.

5.1.2 Rational Method

100 Year Return Period rainfall for 24 hr, F = 240.000 mm

Spread Factor by f Curve from SP 13 = 0.55 (Ref: IRC:SP-13-2004, Fig.4.2)

4 of 16 Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis

5.1.3 Slope Area Method

0 215.465 215.5 210.091 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

5 of 16 Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis

5.1.3.1 Calculation of channel slope

Stream Slope Series1 Linear (Series1)

211.5 y = -0.0038x + 210.52

Slope of channel(1 in ..) = 1/0.0038 = 263

5.1.4 Synthetic Unit Hydrograph Method

6 of 16 Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis

2 UG Runoff Vol. = Area under UG = Area*1cm 25090000 m3

tp = 1.858 / (qp)1.038 26.328 hr,

qp = 2.030/(L/Sqrt(s))0.649 0.078 Cumec/sq.km

Qp= qp xA 195.11 Cumec

Time from rise to peak

W75= 1.477/ (qp)0.876 13.838 hr

WR-50= 0.812/ (qp)0.907 8.234 hr

WR-75= 0.606/(qp)0.791 4.570 hr

TD= 1.1 tp 26.400 hr, Say 24.00 hr

7 of 16 Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis

C. Development of Synthetic Unit Hydrograph

Synthetic Unit Hydrograph

8 of 16 Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis

D. Development of 1cm Unit Hydrograph

9 of 16 Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis

E. Estimation of 100 years Return Period Flood

100 year flood discharge shall be considered for designing waterway

a. For Design Hydrograph

100-year TD - hr Point Rainfall (From Charts)

Conversion Factor for 24 hr 1

100-year 24.000 - hr Areal Rainfall : 18.48 cm

(Ref. - Flood Estimation Report for SubZones 1 e - CWC)

10 of 16 Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis

b. 100-Year Peak Flood

5.2 Adopted Peak Design Discharge

11 of 16 Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis

6 HFL Calculation by Area - Velocity method based on Design Discharge

0 215.465 216.031 210.091 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

12 of 16 Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis

Cross Section at bridge location HFL

13 of 16 Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis

7 Afflux / Velocity Calculation under Bridge

7.1 Lacey's Waterway Calculation for 100 yr flood

Adopted Design Discharge Q 1244.8 Cumecs

7.2 MolesWorth Formulae