You are on page 1of 3

OBE & EBE-LCP IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING TOOL

SY 2021-2022

Name of School: _______________________________________ School ID: _____________________


District: ______________________________________________ Cluster: _______________________
Name of School Head: _________________________________ Category: __MG __Non-Central___Central___JHS/SHS
Name of PSDS: _______________________________________ Date Monitored: ________________
SIGNIFICANT CHALLENGES INTERVENTION
STATUS MOVs DEVELOPMENT
KEY RESULTS AREA (KRA) Completely Partially Not so
Evident Evident Evident
(2) (1) (0)
1. Curriculum Delivery
a. Self-Learning Modules
(SLMs)/Learning Activity
Sheets (LASs) in print or
digital format (whichever is
applicable in the context of
the learner) were made
available during the
quarter.
b. Suggested time frame
was provided by the
teachers to learners on
their assigned tasks
through the Weekly Home
Learning Plan (WHLP).
Flexibility in finishing each
module was accorded to
learners with respect to
their learning needs,
characteristics and level of
understanding to ensure
mastery of the learning
content.
c. Timely and appropriate
monitoring of learning
progress and feedback
mechanism using various
accessible touch points
such as ILMP, Group
Chats, text messaging and
audio/video calls were
utilized.
d. Learner Support
Aide/Learning Facilitators
(family member or any
trained stakeholder within
the community) provided
support to the learners.
e. Instructional Supervision
and Technical Assistance
for Teachers including LAC
Session schedule,
Performance Evaluation
and Tools were available.
2. Framework and
Operational Plan
a. Packing, Distribution,
Retrieval Schedule and
Arrangements of Learning
Activity Sheets and
Assessments were
available.
b. Distribution and
Retrieval Schemes of
Learning Activity Sheets
and Assessments observing
minimum health standards
and safety protocols were
still in place.
c. Printed SLMs/LASs were
placed in safe and secure
area.

3. Funding and other


Resource Requirement
a. School Improvement Plan
and Annual Implementation
Plan were revisited and
adjusted.
b. School Operating Budget
(Mandatory Operational
Expense and LCP
Implementation Expense)
was being utilized as per
BE-LCP
c. Transparency Board was
updated and located in
strategic and conspicuous
area.

4. Partnership and
Linkages
a. List of partners (parents,
community/ barangay,
other stakeholders) for the
whole school year
b. Document showing areas
of support provided with
amount of donations (if any)
for the whole school year
c. Recognition of partners
and stakeholders was done.

5. List of Pertinent
Issuances used as Legal
Basis
a. Legal Basis and DepEd
Issuances were compiled.

Sub-total Remarks: (if there’s any)


Grand Total
(Maximum of 30 points)
Equivalent Rating
(Total Point/30x100%)
Description:
Note:

Completely Evident – covered all KRAs, acted with MOVs and in progress

Partially Evident – covered three or less KRAs, acted with MOVs and in progress

Not so Evident - covered 2 or less KRAs, with no MOVs and no progress at all

Descriptions:
 90% and above Full Implementation (FI)
 58%-89% Initial Implementation (II)
 26%-57% Installation (I)
 25% and below Exploration (E)

Other significant findings:


___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Recommendations:

_______________________________________________________________________________

Monitored by: Conforme:

_____________________________ ___________________________________________
_____________________________ School Head

You might also like