Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prepared by:
LYNDRE G. BAYOTAS
Trainer
Prepared by:
LYNDRE G. BAYOTAS
Trainer
LYNDRE G. BAYOTAS
Trainer
Prepared by:
LYNDRE G. BAYOTAS
Trainer
Prepared by:
LYNDRE G. BAYOTAS
Trainer
P la n a n d p re p a re fo r w o rk
P la n a n d p re p a re fo r w o rk
P re p a re a n d s e t- u p to o ls
P re p a re a n d s e t- u p to o ls
a n d m a te ria ls fo r d ra w in g
a n d m a te ria ls fo r d ra w in g
A R C H ITE C TU R A L LA Y-
PR EP AR E CO M PUTER -
ACHIEVEM ENT CHART
O U T S A N D D E T A IL S
L a y - o u t a rc h ite c tu ra l
L a y - o u t a rc h ite c tu ra l
d ra w in g s a n d d e ta ils
d ra w in g s a n d d e ta ils
A ID E D D R A W IN G S
F IN A L R E M A R K S
S u b m it c o m p le te
S u b m it c o m p le te
d ra w in g s
d ra w in g s
DRAFT
NAME OF TRAINEE
AMOR, TRISHA B. C / / / / C / / / / Competent
CANONES, FORD A. C / / / / C / / / / Competent
CARPIO STEVEN P. C / / / / C / / / / Competent
CASQUEJO, CAROL A. C / / / C / / / /
CASQUEJO, MIKA L. C / / C / / / /
DEL CARPIO VICKY O. C / / / / C / / / / Competent
C
DELOS SANTOS, BERNDETTE S. C / / / /
ENRIQUE, JASPER L. C / / / / C / / / / Competent
GONAZAGA, JHON DAVE CF. / C / / / /
GONZALEX, JESSY O. C / / / / C / / / / Competent
HAMID, KAIZA S. C / / / / C / / / / Competent
HASMIN, GIL T. C / C / / / /
LANURCA, JESS B. C / / / / C / / / /
MAGANIY, JOSHUA Q. C / / / / C / / / /
NARSISO, BIANCA C. C / / / / C / / / /
OMAR, VERONICA T. C / / / / C / / / /
PELAYO, HERNAND H. C / / / / C / / / /
SALAZAR , ARMAN Y. C / / / / C / / / /
SAMONTE, ARALINNE H. C / / / / C / / / /
SANTOS, MICAELA O. C / / / / C / / / /
C R.
SARANDUQUE , CHRISTIAN / / / / C / / / / Competent
SARANDUQUE, FATIMA P.C / / / / C / / / / Competent
SARANDUQUE, KASHA C.C / / / / C / / / /
SIA, KRISTY B. C / / / / C / / / /
TOLENTINO, SARAH R. C / / / / C / / / / Competent
LYNDRE G. BAYOTAS LEGEND TRAINING DURATION: BASIC 18 HOURS COMMON 36 HRS CORE COMPETENCIES 94 HRS
TRAINER C- COMPETENT START OF TRAINING: August 16, 2021
NYC- NOT YET COMPETENT END OF TRAINING: August 23, 2021
DRAFTING NC II
Developed by: STII
Page 19
LYNDRE G. BAYOTAS
of 32
PROGRESS CHART – TECHNICAL DRAFTING NC II
PROGRESS CHART
Lay-out architectural
Lay-out architectural
drawings and details
drawings
DRAFT
NAME OF TRAINEE
AMOR, TRISHA B. C / / / / C / / / / Competent
CANONES, FORD A. C / / / / C / / / / Competent
CARPIO STEVEN P. C / / / / C / / / / Competent
CASQUEJO, CAROL A. C / / / C / / / /
CASQUEJO, MIKA L. C / / C / / / /
DEL CARPIO VICKY O. C / / / / C / / / / Competent
C
DELOS SANTOS, BERNDETTE S. C / / / /
ENRIQUE, JASPER L. C / / / / C / / / / Competent
GONAZAGA, JHON DAVE CF. / C / / / /
GONZALEX, JESSY O. C / / / / C / / / / Competent
HAMID, KAIZA S. C / / / / C / / / / Competent
HASMIN, GIL T. C / C / / / /
LANURCA, JESS B. C / / / / C / / / /
MAGANIY, JOSHUA Q. C / / / / C / / / /
NARSISO, BIANCA C. C / / / / C / / / /
OMAR, VERONICA T. C / / / / C / / / /
PELAYO, HERNAND H. C / / / / C / / / /
SALAZAR , ARMAN Y. C / / / / C / / / /
SAMONTE, ARALINNE H. C / / / / C / / / /
SANTOS, MICAELA O. C / / / / C / / / /
C R.
SARANDUQUE , CHRISTIAN / / / / C / / / / Competent
SARANDUQUE, FATIMA P.C / / / / C / / / / Competent
SARANDUQUE, KASHA C.C / / / / C / / / /
SIA, KRISTY B. C / / / / C / / / /
TOLENTINO, SARAH R. C / / / / C / / / / Competent
LYNDRE G. BAYOTAS LEGEND TRAINING DURATION: BASIC 18 HOURS COMMON 36 HRS CORE COMPETENCIES 94 HRS
TRAINER C- COMPETENT START OF TRAINING: August 16, 2021
NYC- NOT YET COMPETENT END OF TRAINING: August 23, 2021
DRAFTING NC II
Developed by: STII
Page 20
LYNDRE G. BAYOTAS
of 32
MINUTES OF THE MEETING
Focused Group Discussion
DRAFTING NC II
Developed by: STII
Page 21
LYNDRE G. BAYOTAS
of 32
CBT Concerns Discussions Resolutions/Agreement
1. CBT Layout CBT Layout were CBT was properly
properly presented and delivered
explain
2. Monitoring of Proper monitoring of Attendance must be
Attendance attendance. keep properly for
future reference does
must include contact
details of the
participants.
3. Utilization of 9 Learning Area Layout Its Utilization Work
work area and Area should always
utilization/uses/purpos be properly defined
e were properly explain for the participants to
understand it’s
important for the
whole training
sessions.
4. Orientation Orientation was In the process of the
properly presented in Orientation: CBT,
a. CBT accordance to the data Roles of the Trainer
b. Roles and information that and Trainee, TR,
c. TR need as they are CBLM, Facilities and
d. CBLM important for the Evaluation System
e. Facilities Orientation like as must be will
f. Evaluation follows: presented for the
system CBT Presentation participants to fully
Roles of the Trainers understand and learn
and Trainee what expectation and
Training Regulation expected out of the
importance training to what
CBLM were properly competency will be
discussed to its acquired and the
competency required to standard it prescribe
complete the training. in accordance to its
Facilities that are made Quality and Validity
available for the of Information.
trainer and trainee
in the course of the
training.
Evaluation was
illustrated as to how
trainees competent will
DRAFTING NC II
Developed by: STII
Page 22
LYNDRE G. BAYOTAS
of 32
be measured and tested
in the course of the
training.
5. RPL Recognition of Prior RPL must be properly
Learning process what illustrated as to its
process introduce in method used and its
order to help speed up process of validating its
the program for the authenticity.
trainee to help
understand that prior
learning is will
acknowledge to boost
moral and interest of
the participants.
6. Teaching Active Lecture Use the appropriate
methods and Demonstration teaching methods and
technique Individual and group techniques called for by
activity the situation
7. Monitoring of Achievement Chart and Achievement Chart
learning Progressive Chart are and Progress Chart
activities will articulated to the must be illustrated to
a. Achievement participant if how they participant its
chart are monitored and importance and its
b. Progress properly supervise rationality as part of
chart throughout the training the evaluation process
process. if how learning
process is measure as
to its outcomes and
level of competency
based on the CBT
standards.
8. Feedback Feedback is will define Feedback must
and articulated for the always be properly
participant to be evolved articulated in the
in the presentation and sense that it shall
for them to get help to motivate the
interested on the participant and be
programmed involved.
9. Slow learners Mentoring process were Slow Learners must
properly define to help be motivated in the
slow learners process for them to
understand how they get involve and build
are will taken and lead interested on the
DRAFTING NC II
Developed by: STII
Page 23
LYNDRE G. BAYOTAS
of 32
into the training for program.
them to meet the
competency standards
required on the
program.
10. Other concerns Other concern like Other matters to be
school details and presented must be
information, policy and information that is
guidelines, assessment relevant to the training
methods, and and necessary in the
requirements were process of learning for a
properly presented and standard outcome of the
discuss during the training.
session.
Prepared by:
LYNDRE G. BAYOTAS
Trainer
DRAFTING NC II
Developed by: STII
Page 24
LYNDRE G. BAYOTAS
of 32
SIBUGAY TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, INC.
Training Program Evaluation
OBJECTIVE:
This evaluation instrument aims to gather remarks and comments of
the participants related to the conduct of the Programming NC IV.
This will serve as a tool in the improvement and strengthening of the
program.
Part I. Program Evaluation
INSTRUCTIONS:
Please rate the following program components in terms of the
indicators provided below by ticking (/) the column that best describes
your evaluation of each program component. Your rating will be
treated confidentially.
Adjective Rating Numerical Rating
Outstanding 5
Very Good/Very Adequate 4
Good/Adequate 3
Fair/Satisfactory/Average 2
Inadequate/Unsatisfactory/Poor 1
NAME:
___________________________________________________
POSITION/DESIGNATION:
__________________________________________________
ORGANIZATION/INSTITUTION:
________________________________________________
DATE:
________________________________________________
DRAFTING NC II
Developed by: STII
Page 25
LYNDRE G. BAYOTAS
of 32
PROGRAM COMPONENT INDICATORS RATING
5 4 3 2 1
A. Program Design and Organization
1. Clarity of program objectives
2. Organization of course activities
3. Scheduling of activities and time
allotment
4. Attainment of program objectives
B. Course Content
1. Course content vis-à-vis the program
objectives
2. Sequencing of the course contents
3. Sufficiency of information
4. Relevance of course content vis-à-vis
need
C. Training Methodology
1. Effectiveness of selected method
2. Appropriateness to the course
activities
D. Program Administration and
Management
1. Adequacy of provided supplies and
materials
2. Timeliness of provision of supplies
and materials
3. Availability of training equipment
and materials
4. Conduciveness of the training venue
to learning
5. Appropriateness of the physical
layout of the venue
6. Overall accommodation
7. Secretariat service
E. Facilitator/Trainer
Instructions: Write the corresponding number
DRAFTING NC II
Developed by: STII
Page 26
LYNDRE G. BAYOTAS
of 32
to rate each Facilitator/Trainer:
5 Outstanding 4 Very Good 3 Good
2 Average 1 Poor N/A Not
Applicable
1. Knowledge of the subject matter
2. Ability to communicate ideas
3. Ability to arouse interest
4. Ability to encourage participation
5. Ability to organize lecture
6. Ability to answer questions
7. Openness to suggestions and comments
8. Ability to encourage critical and/or
creative thinking
9. Spontaneity in expression of ideas
10. Use of training equipment
11. Comprehensive of lecture
12. Ability to provide adequate
feedback
13. Ability to provide practical
exercises
DRAFTING NC II
Developed by: STII
Page 27
LYNDRE G. BAYOTAS
of 32
LEARNING OUTCOMES RATING
1 2 3 4 5
Core Competencies
1. DRAFT ARCHITECTURAL LAY-OUTS
AND DETAILS
DRAFTING NC II
Developed by: STII
Page 28
LYNDRE G. BAYOTAS
of 32
WORK ATTITUDES RATING
1 2 3 4 5
1. Punctuality/Attendance
2. Resource/Creativity
3. Obedience, respect to authority, rules
and regulations
4. Commitment to work
5. Adaptability to change
6. Cooperation with co-workers
7. Concern to environment preservation
Feedback
Please indicate your recommended training program to be offered by
this Training Institution
DRAFTING NC II
Developed by: STII
Page 29
LYNDRE G. BAYOTAS
of 32
TRAINING EVALUATION REPORT
2. Executive Summary
3. Rationale
4. Objectives
5. Methodology
DRAFTING NC II
Developed by: STII
Page 30
LYNDRE G. BAYOTAS
of 32
PRE-TEST AND POST TEST ANALYSIS
2. CANONES, FORD A. 17 20
3. CARPIO STEVEN P. 15 16
4. CASQUEJO, CAROL A. 15 18
5. CASQUEJO, MIKA L. 18 20
8. ENRIQUE, JASPER L. 9 15
10.GONZALEX, JESSY O. 13 18
11.HAMID, KAIZA S. 15 19
12.HASMIN, GIL T. 18 20
13.LANURCA, JESS B. 15 18
14.MAGANIY, JOSHUA Q. 8 17
15.NARSISO, BIANCA C. 10 18
16.OMAR, VERONICA T. 12 17
17.PELAYO, HERNAND H. 13 19
18.SALAZAR , ARMAN Y. 18 20
19.SAMONTE, ARALINNE H. 15 18
20.SANTOS, MICAELA O. 16 19
21.SARANDUQUE , CHRISTIAN R. 15 19
22.SARANDUQUE, FATIMA P. 18 19
23.SARANDUQUE, KASHA C. 16 18
DRAFTING NC II
Developed by: STII
Page 31
LYNDRE G. BAYOTAS
of 32
24.SIA, KRISTY B. 14 17
25.TOLENTINO, SARAH R. 18 19
25
20
15
pre-test
10 post-test
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Post-test Pre-test
Mean 120.73684 113.4736842
Variance 80.093567 275.9298246
Observations 19 19
Pearson Correlation 0.5722806
Hypothesized Mean Difference 0
Df 18
t Stat 2.322181
P(T<=t) one-tail 0.0160748
t Critical one-tail 1.7340636
P(T<=t) two-tail 0.0321496
t Critical two-tail 2.100922
DRAFTING NC II
Developed by: STII
Page 32
LYNDRE G. BAYOTAS
of 32