You are on page 1of 2

WHAT I KNOW (INFERENCE) HOW I KNOW (TEXTUAL EVIDENCE) HOW WILL I WRITE ABOUT THIS?

(YOUR
PROCESS OF ADAPTING THE NARRATIVE)
1. The character of Serungal is: a man who 1. The original text says that: Serungal was 1. In my new text, I will develop this
obtains perseverance and won’t give up too determined to pursue his love despite the character by: making him interact more with
easily especially in love. He’s ready to help challenges given by the rajah. He also helped the character I’ve chosen, which is the
anyone who is need and give full others who were in need though he himself youngest daughter of rajah. Also, I will make
consideration for someone without will have to face his own circumstances. He his characteristics flow throughout the story,
expecting anything or any reward in return in helped the ant and the firefly who were specifically his relationship among every
order to pay for his deeds. about to be killed, and also the squirrel was characters he meets, in order to prove that
rescued by him. his traits are genuine and as expected from
the original story.

2. The theme of the original text is: A 2. The original text says that: 2. In my new text, I will be consistent with
person’s worth is not meant to be judged but the theme by: showing the character’s values
it is destined to be felt and understood. 1. Serungal proved his worth as a person by and real identity in order to emphasize my
accomplishing the given tasks to him by the chosen theme by letting the character grow
rajah despite his ugly judgment. his relationship more with the other
supporting characters.
2. Serungal was helping an ant, a firefly, and
a squirrel which proved that he has a heart
of gold. It shows that we should notice the
worth of a person first before we define
them.
3. The point of view of the original text is: 3. In the original text, I see that: it’s not 3. In my new text, I will shift the PoV by:
Third person’s point of view, which is the Serungal nor the rajah nor any other adding dialogues or conversations in order to
author character inside the story who was telling maintain each other’s thoughts and ideas
the story but it was a third person’s point of among themselves. Also, through adding
view, which is the author descriptive actions such as, what he’she is
currently doing during that moment or
event.

4. The author’s purpose of the original text 4. In the original text, I see that: the author 4. In my new text, I will be consistent with
is: Naarative- the author narrates the story focused on the effort and actions of Serungal the author’s purpose by: continue narrating
thorugh his narration in the story the events of the story which transpired
especially between the main and the
supporting character to inspire the reader’s
even more.
CULTURAL CONTEXT Based on my research, I found out that:
Rajah’s given tasks or challenges to Serungal 1. there is a culture in Malaysia called
before allowing him to court his daughter bethrotal or pre-wedding where the bride’s
and eventually allowed them to marry each parents and the groom’s have to settle or
other is a culture of making the man face make arrangements for the marriage. It
through different difficulties in order to test involves exchanging gifts between both of
and to prove himself to the family, for the their families. The groom’s side has to give
sake of, not only the woman but also for dowry to the bride before the actual
their future life. wedding. This tells that rajah might be
thinking that Serungal won’t be able to
provide something for their family in case
they get married which is why he judged him
and made him go through challenges first.

2. In Malaysian culture, women need the


consent of a male guardian to marry.This
shows that rajah was so protective of his
daughter. Also, Malays usually marry
members of their own ethnic group or same
life status, which can be a reason why rajah
didn’t want Serungal to become his son-in-
law.

You might also like