Mix Design of CTB As Per MORT&H

Blended for CTB 37.
5 mm NMAS
PQC as per MORT&H 5th rev, Table 400-4
Material 40 mm 20.00 mm 10.00 mm 6 mm down Blend Mix
Percentage of 25 13 20 42 100
mix
CTB Gradation
Sieve Percentage passing of Mixed Ideal Limit
Blended
53 100 100 100 100 100.00 100.00

37.5 96.78 100 100 100 99.20 97.50
19 6.5 94.88 100 100 75.96 72.50
9.5 0.23 3.97 93.49 100 61.27 67.50
4.75 0 1.64 7.19 96.80 42.31 62.50
0.6 0 0 1.78 43.00 18.42 36.50
0.3 0 0 0.96 25.00 10.69 22.50
0.075 0 0 0 14.00 5.88 5.00
120.00
PQC Gradation
100.00
80.00
% OF PASSING
60.00
40.00
20.00
0.00
0 10 20 30 40 50
NO OF SIEVES
Ideal Limit CTB Gradation of Mixed Blended Lower Limits Upper Limits
Applicable:
CTB used in Rigid Pavement over the upper sub base of GSB/DL layer, min thickness 100 mm to 200 mm
as per the requirement
Agg. are treated that why impermeability are high & water entrusion are very less as comaperd to WMM. H
Advantage: moisture intrusion throgh the subgrade is nt possible for this
Road deflections are found very less as compared to GSB

Its covers up the larger area for stress impact, due to that it reduce the pot holes, deformation & subgrade
less thickness reqd. as comaperd to GSB/WMM, due to Agg. Are treated in this layer
Rutting is reduced in the CTB layer & traffick load channise into the subgrade
NMAS
00-4
D10 0.27
D60 9.18
As per MORT&H
Table 400-4 Should be more than >5
Lower Limits Upper as per MORT&H
Limits
specification
100.00 100.00 100 D60/D10

Cu
95.00 100.00 95-100 34.30
45.00 100.00 45-100
35.00 100.00 35-100 Plasticity Modulus
25.00 100.00 25-100 should not >60
8.00 65.00 8-65 Found NP
5.00 40.00 5-40
0.00 10.00 0-10 After obating the individual Gradation of each mate
REMARKS: 20 mm, 10 mm & 06 mm down with designated siev
specification, combined gradtion will be achived by
50 60
mits Upper Limits

ness 100 mm to 200 mm
ss as comaperd to WMM. Hence
s, deformation & subgrade failure

ayer
As per the MORT&H section 900

PI found for blended materials passing
LL not more than 45 %
from 425 micron sieve- NP (Non Plastic)
Should not > 20
(PI) X (% of passing 75 micron)
idual Gradation of each materials 40 mm,

m down with designated sieves as per the
ed gradtion will be achived by this values
ORT&H section 900
MDD UCS at 7 days age
SL NO %OF CEMENT % OF AGG. OMC %
gm/cc N/mm2
1 3.00 97.00 2.425 5.180 3.140
2 3.50 96.50 2.430 5.400 4.170
3 4.00 96.00 2.450 5.800 4.970
4 4.50 95.50 2.460 6.300 5.420
5 5.00 95.00 2.470 6.600 6.130
Cement Content Vs UCS

7.000
6.000
5.000
4.000
UCS
3.000
2.000
1.000
0.000
2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50
Cement Content
According to MORT&H recommendation, after obtaining the OMC with respect of% of cement, we need
to cast the cubes each of three no of set reqd, & after age of 7days moist curing compressive strength we
will find out. Then muliplyong the comressive strenth * 0.75 to find out the Unconfined compressive
strength (UCS).
Now as per the graphical form & requirement of target UCS say 5.5 N.mm2 we will find out the ce
content from the graph 4.50 %.
4.50 5.00 5.50
Now after obtaining the cement content with respect to the target UCS as per the requirement, we
to prepare the mixture with design cement content (4.50%), OMC (6.30% found earlier) & blend
Agg.After that preaper the moulds as per the modified proctor test & fimnd out the final MDD Vs
graph & for conformity test cast three no of cyliner or cubes to check the the target UCS at age of 7
moist curing condition & MDD/OMC also for the same.
% of cement, we need
mpressive strength we
nfined compressive
m2 we will find out the cement
s per the requirement, we need

30% found earlier) & blended
mnd out the final MDD Vs OMC
e the target UCS at age of 7 days
e same.
CTB MIX DESIGN
TEST REPORT FOR DETERMINATION OF MDD & OMC FOR CTB USING MODIFIED PROCTOR
METHOD AS PER IS 2720 PART 8
PROJECT:xxx CONTRACTOR: xxx
DATE ON WHICH SAMPLE TAKEN: xxx
Cement used: 3.00% of total wt of materials LOCATION: xxx
DENSITY
DETERMINATION NO. 1 2 3 4 5
WEIGHT OF MOULD(GM) 5475 5475 5475 5475 5475
WEIGHT OF MOULD(gm) + COMPACTED SOIL 10860 11098 11211 11250 11211
WEIGHT OF COMACTED SOIL, W(gm) 5385 5623 5736 5775 5736
VOLUME OF MOULD(VCC) 2250 2250 2250 2250 2250
BULK DENSITY [w/(MOULD VOLUME) gm/cc 2.393 2.499 2.549 2.567 2.549
WATER CONTENT
Wt. OF CONTAINER 79.92 80.25 84.16 86.31 85.66
Wt. OF CONTAINER +WET OF SOIL= W1 620.12 576.66 581.92 585.36 620.12
Wt. OF CONTAINER +DRY OF SOIL= W2 608.12 556.2 557.45 554.33 578.63
WATERCONTENT, W=(W1-W2)/W2X100% 2.27 4.30 5.17 6.63 8.42
DRY DENSITY 2.340 2.396 2.424 2.407 2.351
MDD & OMC AS PER IS 2720 PART 8

2.440
2.420
2.400
2.380
DRY DENSITY
2.360
2.340
2.320
2.300
2.280
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00
MOISTURE CONTENT
MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY(MDD)= 2.425 gm/cc

OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT(OMC)= 5.18 %
RAMMER WT 4.94 KG
NO OF BLOWS 55
8.00 9.00
CTB MIX DESIGN
DENSITY
WEIGHT OF MOULD(GM)
WEIGHT OF MOULD(gm) + COMPACTED SOIL
WEIGHT OF COMACTED SOIL, W(gm)
VOLUME OF MOULD(VCC)
BULK DENSITY [w/(MOULD VOLUME) gm/cc
WATER CONTENT
Wt. OF CONTAINER
Wt. OF CONTAINER +WET OF SOIL= W1
Wt. OF CONTAINER +DRY OF SOIL= W2
WATERCONTENT, W=(W1-W2)/W2X100%
DRY DENSITY

12.000
10.000
8.000
DRY DENSITY
6.000
4.000
2.000
0.000
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00
MOISTURE CONTENT

OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT(OMC)=5.40 %
0.00 12.00
CTB MIX DESIGN
DENSITY
WEIGHT OF MOULD(GM)
WATER CONTENT
Wt. OF CONTAINER
DRY DENSITY

12.000
10.000
8.000
DRY DENSITY
6.000
4.000
2.000
0.000
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00
MOISTURE CONTENT

RAMMER WT 4.94 KG
NO OF BLOWS 55
0.00 12.00
CTB MIX DESIGN
DENSITY
WEIGHT OF MOULD(GM) 4108
WATER CONTENT
Wt. OF CONTAINER
DRY DENSITY

12.000
10.000
8.000
DRY DENSITY
6.000
4.000
2.000
0.000
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00
MOISTURE CONTENT

RAMMER WT 4.94 KG
NO OF BLOWS 55
0.00 12.00
CTB MIX DESIGN
DENSITY
WEIGHT OF MOULD(GM)
WATER CONTENT
Wt. OF CONTAINER
DRY DENSITY

12.000
10.000
8.000
DRY DENSITY
6.000
4.000
2.000
0.000
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00
MOISTURE CONTENT

RAMMER WT 4.94 KG
NO OF BLOWS 55
0.00 12.00

Mix Design of CTB As Per MORT&H

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mix Design of CTB As Per MORT&H

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Blended for CTB 37.

53 100 100 100 100 100.00 100.00

Road deflections are found very less as compared to GSB

100.00 100.00 100 D60/D10

mits Upper Limits

ss as comaperd to WMM. Hence

s, deformation & subgrade failure

As per the MORT&H section 900

(PI) X (% of passing 75 micron)

idual Gradation of each materials 40 mm,

Cement Content Vs UCS

4.50 5.00 5.50

m2 we will find out the cement

s per the requirement, we need

MDD & OMC AS PER IS 2720 PART 8

MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY(MDD)= 2.425 gm/cc

MDD & OMC AS PER IS 2720 PART 8

MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY(MDD)= 2.430 gm/cc

MDD & OMC AS PER IS 2720 PART 8

MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY(MDD)= 2.450 gm/cc

MDD & OMC AS PER IS 2720 PART 8

MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY(MDD)= 2.460 gm/cc

MDD & OMC AS PER IS 2720 PART 8

MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY(MDD)= 2.470 gm/cc

You might also like