0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2K views2 pages

QAP For Bitumen Job

This document provides a quality assurance plan for bitumen work on an IPP aluminium plant project. It outlines 4 key items - surface dressing, crack repairing, tack coat application, and DBM/SDBC laying. For each item, it specifies the parameters to be checked, extent of checking, acceptance criteria, responsible parties, and records to be maintained to ensure the work meets specifications. Checks include dimensional measurements, visual inspections, material testing, and verifying quantities used meet standards. Records like joint records and lab test reports will be furnished and signed off by the contractor, third party inspector and client to ensure quality standards are achieved.

Uploaded by

Sasanka Sekhar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2K views2 pages

QAP For Bitumen Job

This document provides a quality assurance plan for bitumen work on an IPP aluminium plant project. It outlines 4 key items - surface dressing, crack repairing, tack coat application, and DBM/SDBC laying. For each item, it specifies the parameters to be checked, extent of checking, acceptance criteria, responsible parties, and records to be maintained to ensure the work meets specifications. Checks include dimensional measurements, visual inspections, material testing, and verifying quantities used meet standards. Records like joint records and lab test reports will be furnished and signed off by the contractor, third party inspector and client to ensure quality standards are achieved.

Uploaded by

Sasanka Sekhar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • Quality Assurance Plan: Details a comprehensive quality assurance plan including reference documents, acceptance criteria, and inspection requirements.

QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN

CLIENT: VEDANTA ALUMINIUM PLANT LTD.


SUBJECT: QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN FOR IPP BITUMEN JOB (REV- 00)

Extent Agency
Sl. No Item Category Type / Method of check Reference Acceptance Format of record Records to be Remarks
of
check document norms furnished CONTRACTOR TPIA CLIENT

A B C D E F G H I J L
1 Surface dressing

Checking for layout &


proper cleaning by Air Specifications/ Specifications/
a) Major Dimensional check 100% Joint Records Yes P RW W Site Verification/Review
Blower to removed dust Methodology Methodology
particles

Dismentaling existing Specifications/ Specifications/


b) Major Visual Checks 100% Joint Records No P RW W Site Verification/Review
materials Methodology Methodology

Disposal/proper stacking
Specifications/ Specifications/
f) of breaking materials in Minor Visual Checks 60% -- No P RW W Site Verification/Review
Methodology Methodology
demarked area.
S
p
e
2 Crack Repairing by Emulsion RS 1 grade cationic based c
i
f
i
Filling sand & stone dust Specifications/ Specifications/
a) Critical Visual Checks 100% c Joint Records Yes P RW W Site Verification/Review
particles Methodology Methodology
a
t
i
o
n
Check for proper Specifications/ Specifications/
b) Critical Visual Checks 100% s Joint Records yes P RW W Site Verification/Review
ramming Methodology Methodology
/

M
Laying RS 1 e
Emulsion(Normal t Specifications/ Specifications/
c) Critical Visual Checks 100% Joint Records yes P RW W Site Verification/Review
Temp.) over stone dust h Methodology Methodology
filled area o
d
3 Tack Coat (Emulsion) by RS 1 Grade cationic based/mentioned as o per BOQ specifiaction wise
l
o
S
Laying Tack Coat with g
p
Grade of RS 1 (or else as ey Lab Test report with MTC
per PO/Design Mix wise) Specifications/ IS 8887-2018
a) Critical Visual Checks 100% c for RS 1 Grade & relavant Yes P RW W Site Verification/Review
by Emusion i Methodology (Cationic types)
tests as per specifications
Sprayer/Mechanical f
Sparyer i
c
a
t
Emusion
i
As per IRC 16 Sprayer/Mechanical
As per IRC 16 & MORT&H 5th o
2008 or Sparyer reqd. to laying the
Check for proper qty revision (Clause 500-5), 4 kg/10 n
Specifications/ MORT&H Tack Coat uniformly all
b) engaged as per Critical SQM or as per mentioned in 100% s Joint Records yes P RW W
Methodology Section 500, over the area. However,
specifications BOQ area should be used on /
Table 505, 5th manual laying will be
Non Bituminous surface
revision wise conducted as per
M
instruction of EIC (VL)
e
t
4 DBM/SDBC by VG 30 or VG 40 Grade (50-80) mm thickness/ ashmentioned in BOQ specifiaction or subject to site condition wise
o
d
Laying of Bituminous o
macadum or DBM or l Gradation of
Lab Test report with MTC
SDBC (with 130 to 140 o DBM/BM/SDBC materilas
for VG 30 Bitumen, Design
Degree celcius) with 50 At site Gradation test reqd. for g after Bitumen Extraction
Mix as per MS-2 7th
mm compacted BM or DBM or SDBC with Specifications/ Specifications/ Test must be conducted at
a) Critical 100% y revision wise & other yes External Agency RW W
thicknesss by 8 to 10 Ton proper IS sieve as per IRC 111 Methodology Methodology site (every 5th no of
relavant test as per
Vibro Roller as per Table 7 vehicle) as per IRC 111
specifications, once for each
standard specifiaction Table 7 wise or per day 01
source
wise (as per IRC 111- trila basis.
2009)

As per MOM, each & every


Check for Binder content
vechile Binder content test
(as per PO) by Bitumen
ASTM D ASTM D (every 5th no of vhiecle )
b) Extraction Test & after Critical Bitumen extraction Test 100% Joint Records yes P RW W
2172/MORT&H 2172/MORT&H reqd. Also gradation test
that Gradation test reqd.
will be conducted each
at site.
working days

After completing Hot


Check for temp. while Hot Rolling should be completed As per IRC 111-
As per IRC 111- rollling, Cold rolling reqd.
c) rolling as per IRC 111- Critical within temp of 100 to 110 degree 100% 2009, Table 10 - yes P RW W
2009, Table 10 wise as per standard
2009 table 10 wise celcius wise
specifications basis

Check the Marshall Stability test


with VMA (Voids of minarel
Agg.),VFB (Voids filled by
Check for Marshall
Bitumen), % of Air Voids, After compaction (Hot &
Stability, Density &
Theoritical Max. Sp. Gravty of Cold rolling) of layer, Core
Flow value test by Core
the sample as per ASTM D-2041 (Randomly 03 Nos sample
cutter method (dia 150 Specifications/ Specifications/
d) Critical & Density of Compcated value 100% Joint Records yes P W W had been reqd.) must taken
mm as per standard Methodology Methodology
of Core sapmle (in gm/cc) as per & filled up the area by
specifiaction wise) as per
MS 2 requirement wise, manually mixed by same
AASHTO T245/ASTM
frequency may be follwed as per materials at site asap.
D1559/ASTM D6927
IRC 111-2009 Table 13 or
random wise as site condition
based
5 Pre Mix Seal surface (MSS)/BC/SDBC 30 mm thickness/ as mentioned in BOQ specifiaction or subject to site condition wise

Laying of Pre Mix seal


Gradation of Premix Seal
Coat (with 130 to 140 Lab Test report with MTC
coat or BC layer after
Degree celcius) with 30 At site Gradation test reqd. for for VG 30 Bitumen, Design
Bitumen Extraction test
mm compacted Pre Mix Seal surface/BC/SDBC Mix as per MS-2 7th
Specifications/ Specifications/ must be conducted at site as
a) thicknesss by 8 to 10 Ton Critical layer with proper IS sieve as per 100% revision wise & other yes External Agency RW W
Methodology Methodology per MORT&H 5t
Vibro Roller as per IRC SP 078 & IRC 111 Table 7 relavant test as per
revision ,clause 500-19 &
Standard Specification wise respectively specifications, once for each
IRC 111 Table 7 wise
wise (as per IRC 111 source
respectively.
-2009)

Check for Binder content As per MOM, each & every


(as per PO) by Bitumen vechile Binder content test
Specifications/ Specifications/
b) Extraction Test & after Critical Bitumen extraction Test 100% Joint Records yes P RW W reqd. Also gradation test
Methodology Methodology
that Gradation test reqd. will be conducted each
at site. working days

After completing Hot


Hot Rolling should be completed
Check for temp. while Specifications/ Specifications/ rollling, Cold rolling reqd.
c) Critical within temp of 100 to 110 degree 100% - yes P RW W
rolling Methodology Methodology as per standard
celcius
specifications basis

Check the Marshall Stability test


with VMA (Voids of minarel
Agg.),VFB (Voids filled by
Check for Marshall
Bitumen), % of Air Voids, After compaction (Hot &
Stability, Density &
Theoritical Max. Sp. Gravty of Cold rolling) of layer, Core
Flow value test by Core
the sample as per ASTM D-2041 (Randomly 03 Nos sample
cutter method (dia 150 Specifications/ Specifications/
d) Critical & Density of Compcated value 100% Joint Records yes P W W had been reqd.) must taken
mm as per standard Methodology Methodology
of Core sapmle (in gm/cc) as per & filled the area by
specifiaction wise) as per
MS 2 requirement wise, manually mixed BM
AASHTO T245/ASTM
frequency may be follwed as per materials at site asap.
D1559/ASTM D6927
IRC 111-2009 Table 13 or
random wise as site condition
based

6 Thermoplastic Paints for road marking

Check for Primer over


Concrete surface/BM
surface & followed by
Methodology & MTC of
applying Thermoplastic Specifications/ Specifications/
a) Critical Visual Checks 100% - yes P RW W paints must be provide
paints (Cataline or Methodology Methodology
from Vendor
Reflexline or equivalent
alkyle based as per EIC
of VL

Check for applying


paints (for Hot
Application) by Modern
Propeller Road marking
Visual Checks/Coin Test s per
machine with 2.5 mm Specifications/ Specifications/
b) direction EIC of VL/Thickness Joint Records yes P RW W Site Verification/Review
single coat layer along Methodology Methodology
gauge
with Binder, Glass beads
250 gm Per SQM reqd.
as per MORT&H (Table
800.4) & IRC 35 (1997)

Legends: P PERFORM
R RANDOM
W WITNESS
RW RANDOM WITNESS
RM RANDOM MONITORING

TPIA THIRD PARTY INSPECTION


AGENCY

INCOMING MATERIAL
IMIR INSPECTION REPORT
(Weighment slip & Batch
report of BM)

You might also like