Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Date: 26-Sept-2006
Project Number: EN27130
Document Number 970119
Rev 0
Kevin Moorman 8x12 Torque Track Analysis 31 Aug 2006
c/o Tesco Corporation P. 1 / 2
Resolve the torque capacity of the 8"x12" bolted flange for friction.
Use equation 18.1(b), page 677, "Fundamentals of Machine Component Design", Second Ed., (c) 1991 Juvinall and
Marshek.
1. Friction Restraint
Tmax := 57282lbf ⋅ ft Tmax = 687 kipf ⋅ in Maximum breakout torque of ECI900 top drive.
Flange dimensions:
15 15
w := 7 ⋅ in l := 11 in Width and depth of the 8"x12" flange.
16 16 p/n 19233, drawing 44110101.
3 13
rc := in Db := in Nb := 16 Flange corner radius, stud hole diameter, number of studs.
4 16
Sy
Sp := 105ksi Sy := Sp Ssy := Proof stress, yield stress, and shear yield stress (by distortion
3 energy theorem) of ASTM A-193 B7 stud.
CALCULATIONS:
2
π ⋅ Db
2
Af := l ⋅ w − π ⋅ ri − Nb ⋅ − (4 − π )⋅ rc2 Contact area of mating flanges, not including alignment pin hole,
4 stud holes, and corner rounds.
p :=
(
Nb ⋅ 0.55⋅ Sp ⋅ At ) Contact pressure of mating flanges due to tension of studs,
Af p = 3724 psi
assuming that the mating flanges are rigid.
See page 382 ibid., bolt tension to be approx. 55% of proof due
to variations in tightening and subsequent relaxation.
ro
2
T1 := 2π ⋅ p ⋅ f ⋅ r dr T1 = 192 kipf ⋅ in Torque capacity due to friction of region 1, annular region from
ri alignment pin to depth of flange.
Eqn 18.1 (b) ibid.
l
2
w÷2 2
T2 := 4 ⋅ asin ⋅ p ⋅ f ⋅ r dr T2 = 277 kipf ⋅ in Torque capacity due to friction of region 2, partial circular regions
r outside of region 1.
ro Modified version of eqn 18.1 (b) ibid.
Kevin Moorman 8x12 Torque Track Analysis 31 Aug 2006
c/o Tesco Corporation P. 2 / 2
2 2
l +w
2
w÷ 2 l÷2 2 Torque capacity due to friction of region 3, corners of flanges
T3 := 4 asin − acos p ⋅ f ⋅ r dr
r r outside of region 2, not including rounded flange corners.
l Modified version of eqn 18.1 (b) ibid.
2
T3 = 71 kipf ⋅ in
T1 + T2 + T3 = 540 kipf ⋅ in
T1 + T2 + T3
SF := SF = 0.79 Safety factor of bolted flanges to withstand full
Tmax breakout torque.
If the studs were to be torqued to 75% of proof, the safety factor
compared to full breakout torque is greater than 1.0.
It is possible for the flanges to slip at full breakout torque,
causing the studs to be loaded in shear.
(Sw⋅ 0.5) ( )
2 2
R1 := + Sl ⋅ 2.5 Stud centre distances from track centre.
Four studs each with the same radius relative to track centre.
(Sw⋅ 1.5) ( )
2 2
R2 := + Sl ⋅ 2.5
(Sw⋅ 1.5) ( )
2 2
R3 := + Sl ⋅ 1.5
(Sw⋅ 1.5) ( )
2 2
R4 := + Sl ⋅ 0.5
V1 := 1lbf V2 := 1lbf V3 := 1lbf V4 := 1lbf Initial guesses necessary to find iterative solution.
Vmax
τ max := τ max = 32 ksi
At Maximum stud shear stress at maximum breakout torque.
Ssy
SF := SF = 1.9 Safety factor of the stud-fastened 8"x12" torque track flange of the
τ max heaviest-loaded stud compared to shear yield assuming frictionless
interface.
!"#
$% & '
#(
, -."
# #
(
!
"#$ %
&'$ (
') !
"#
*
!
! !
"#$ %
&'+$ ,
-)% !
"#
. ,
-!"
#$ %
&'+$ /
)% !
"#
01 2 ,
' 3%
&'+ -
,&(
4# ,3 %
&'+ /
&'
/
,/- ."
# #
(
!
"#$ (
&(+$ ,
') !
"#
*
!
! !
"#$ (
&(+$ ,)
,( !
"#
. ,
-!"
#$ (
&(+$ (
()(
//!
"#
01 2 ,
' 3(
&(+ (
-&
4# ,3 (
&(+ ,&
) &
*
"*"
+
!"
!" #
$%&&'$" !
" #
$%&&'$" !" #
(' )*%+"!
#
,,'-)& ' !" #
,,'-)& ' !
" #
# . /0 10
2
3 4
2
$%&&'$" 5 1
/
0 ! 2 ,,
'
-)& '
! 2
" 0 4 4
0
2
+ 2