Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
and Cambridge University Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Journal of Southeast Asian History
23
the proletariat supporting the rebel Katipunan3 and the bourgeoisie aid
ing the Spanish r?gime? (6) Had the Revolution actually ended when
the Americans attacked the Spaniards in 1898? This historical emphasis
is attributable to Philippine nationalism, for the Revolution of 1896 is to
Filipinos what the French Revolution of 1789 is to the French: a time
of national glory. Nationalism inspires too the stress on the pre-Spanish
Philippines. Foreigners have often, too often, commented that the Fili
pinos had no civilisation whatever before the Spanish conquest, and Fili
pino historians have felt obligated to refute this unwarranted generalisa
tion. Thus motivated, they sometimes accept questionable evidence that,
for example, the Philippines were an integral part of Sri Vijaya and
Majapahit4 and that the kingdom of Taw?lis? visited by Ibn Battuta
was the Philippine province of Pangasinan of Lingayen Gulf.5
24
10. For brief descriptions of archives in Italy and Spain, see John Leddy Phelan,
The Hispanization of the Philippines, The University of Wisconsin Pressl
Madison, Wisconsin (1959), pp. 203-206. For more detailed information, consult
the Spanish scholarly journal, Revista de Archivos, Bibliotecas y M?seos, Madrid
(1871-).
11. The National Archives and Records Service has Philippine documents for the
period 1898-1946.
12. Except for the early Spanish period, the Philippine collection in the Library
of Congress is superior to that in the Newberry Library.
13. For example, W. E. Retana, Archivo del Bibli?filo Filipino: Recopilaci?n de
Documentos Hist?ricos, Cient?ficos, Literarios y Pol?ticos y Estudios Bibliogr?ficos
Madrid (1895-1905), 5 volumes; Emma H. Blair and James A. Robertson, The
Philippine Islands 1493-1898, Cleveland (1903-1909), 55 volumes; Jos? Toribio
Medina, Colecci?n de documentos in?ditos para la Historia de Chile_
Santiago de Chile (1888-1902), 30 volumes; Colecci?n de documentos in?ditos
para la historia de Espa?a, Madrid (1842-1895) 112 volumes; Colecci?n general
de documentos relativos a las Islas Filipinas existentes en el Archivo de Indias
de Sevilla_Barcelona (1918-1923), 5 volumes; Mart?n Fern?ndez de Navarrete,
Colecci?n de los viages y descubrimientos que hicieron por mar los espa?oles
desde fines del siglo XV, con varios documentos in?ditos concernientes a la
historia de la castellana y los establecimientos en Indias, Madrid (1825-1837),
5 volumes; Luis Torres de Mendoza, Colecci?n de documentos in?ditos relativos
al descubrimiento, conquista, y organizaci?n de las antiguas posesiones espa?olas
de Am?rica y Oceania_Madrid (1864-1884), 42 volumes; Colecci?n de docu
mentos in?ditos relativos al descubrimiento, conquista y organizaci?n de las
antiguas posesiones espa?oles de ultramar, Madrid (1886-1932), 25 volumes; and
Felix Zubillaga, Monumenta Mexicana, Rome (1956, 1959), 2 volumes, additional
volumes projected.
25
27
31
35