Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ENGL 1302
2 September 2022
Introduction
help your body to maintain chemical reactions, which in turn means balance the fluids in and
out of cells and the body. The body gets electrolytes from the foods and liquids it consumes.
Electrolytes are essential minerals like sodium, calcium, and potassium, the body needs these
minerals to function. One energy drink high in sodium, carbohydrates, and potassium is
Gatorade. Many athletes run out of energy before the completion of their athletic performance
because the body gets rid of the essential minerals via sweat. On average athletes lose 2%-5% of
their body weight in water during an athletic performance (Latzka and Montain). In this water
are the essential minerals (electrolytes). An effect of mineral loss tracked in this experiment is
short term memory. When the body exerts such high levels of minerals, some cognitive skills are
affected, including short term memory. When athletes maintain their mineral levels properly,
their cognitive and physical functions aren’t affected in a negative way. Therefore, the goal of
the experiment is to determine whether an athlete can maintain their essential minerals
Methods
This study aimed to test maintenance of essential minerals after an athletic performance. The
experiment included observing and gathering data from two members of the Texas A&M International
Background
Each day the basketball team is highly encouraged to track their water consumption throughout the
days. Their goal is approximately 100 ounces of water a day or about 7 plastic water bottles. This is to
maintain their hydration levels for optimal performance. The team dynamic stretches 10 minutes before
their workouts, then continues with their workouts starting at 11 a.m. Both members of the team who
are being tested are 21 years old. Test subject one is 6’1 and test subject two is 5’6. They go through the
The gathered data was based on observations, and a series of questions given before and after
their performances. The athletic performances consisted of 30-minute sessions over the span of four
days. The first day of the experiment was a control day, where the athletes had no restrictions to how
they hydrated before their performances. The performances consisted of an everyday basketball
practice. The basketball practices consisted of six stations. Two stations consisted of three-point
shooting, one station consisted of layups, one station consisted of elbow shots, one consisted of free-
throws, and the last station consisted of ball-handling. Each station was exactly three minutes long for a
total of eighteen minutes at stations. The rest of the thirty minutes was spent doing transitional work.
The transitional work consisted of running up and down the court while being given situations. Each
player ran down the court approximately thirty times. These athletic performances stayed consistent
The materials used were Gatorades, specifically cool blue flavored. There was also a survey
given. Each day the test subjects were given a cool blue flavored Gatorade exactly an hour and a half
before their athletic performance. The athletic performance started at 11 am every day. The subjects
were given a Gatorade at 9:30 am each day. The time in between hydration and performance was a
factor to account for before starting the experiment. The ideal time to hydrate before a performance is
1-2 hours before (Duvillard and Braun). This gives the athletes time to digest the liquid and allow the
electrolytes to travel to their respective destinations in the body. Their performance output was
observed during their workouts. Right before the test subjects got onto the court, the athletes were
asked to remember a word. The words given were mother, bottle, fish, and ladder (the words came
from a random word generator from the internet). Each on a different day, for example mother on the
first day, bottle on the second etc. The subjects were given different words on different days to keep the
experiment as unbiased as possible. Exactly ten minutes after their athletic performances, the subjects
were given a survey that consisted of questions. An example of a question asked was: Did you
experience a headache at all during your workout? The questions were designed as indicators for
mineral loss. It is important for athletes to be aware of their mineral loses during performances.
The first day (control), where both athletes had free reign over their hydration, both athletes
took a significantly longer time to remember their respective words. Both athletes also answered “yes”
to the “did you experience a headache during your workout?” question. The first subject said they had
energy levels throughout the entire workout. The second subject said they felt their energy levels had
remembered their word in less than a second, the second test subject took approximately two seconds
to remember their word. Both subjects said they had felt energy through the entire workout.
The third day, both athletes had remembered their respective words in less than a second.
Neither of them had experienced a headache during the workout, and both had felt energy throughout
The fourth day, both athletes remembered their words as soon as the question was asked. Like
day 3, neither had experienced headaches, and both had mentioned that they had felt energy
The result from the experiment suggests athletes should drink a Gatorade or some other form of
electrolyte to replenish their mineral loss during a workout. The control day the results had shown that
the two athletes had taken a significantly longer time to remember their respective words compared to
the days when they were drinking the Gatorade before their performances. Since short term memory
loss is an indication of the loss of minerals in the body, the control day signifies the athlete’s loss of their
essential minerals.
There were a few conflicts that could have swayed the results. The subjects were not being
observed outside of the window between when they were supposed to drink the Gatorade and after the
survey was given post performance. The subjects could have been consuming foods and beverages that
increased or decreased their energy levels outside of that window. There were no restrictions to what
the subjects were consuming outside of the window. There also could have been a conflict with
Latzka, William A., and Scott J. Montain. “WATER and ELECTROLYTE REQUIREMENTS for
EXERCISE.” Clinics in Sports Medicine, vol. 18, no. 3, July 1999, pp. 513–524, 10.1016/s0278-
5919(05)70165-4. Accessed 20 Sept. 2020.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278591905701654
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899900704001029
Unit 1 Peer Review Workshop: Content/Madison
Directions: Mark your responses directly onto the paper you are editing. Or, you can write your
answers here. If you are unsure, simply state that something seems off but you are unsure of
what.
1. Does the author make a conclusion as an expert of this topic? Does this claim reveal
something to you that you did not know before? What is the claim? Mark it in the essay.
A= She doesn’t use that of a formal writing as an expert would but anyways she knows
exactly about what she’s talking about.
2. Is the author’s thesis statement clear and direct? Does it make a claim about the findings
and come at the end of the literature review? If not, give the author suggestions for
revision.
A= She was clear and direct, did not had problems to show her findings. Easy to
understand.
3. Does the author use elements from his/her experiment and two outside sources to support
the findings from the experiment? What are they? Where could the author use more?
A= Yes, she had two quoted sentences from her sources. Maybe she can use more, the
quotes are brief but still very concise and clear.
4. Are the two sources peer-reviewed? Mark them in the text. Tell the author if the sources
are not peer-reviewed so they know to find other sources.
A= I think she can extend her discussion part. I don’t really think she needed something
in that section but I feel an extension can make a favorable change.
6. Does the author maintain objectivity during his/her essay? Does the author establish
his/her ethos as an author? How can he/she be more reliable? Mark in the text where the
author tends to be subjective.
A= She maintained objectivity throughout the essay. However, she only had two citations
along the essay, making it lack support for her credibility and reliability.
7. What are three things that this author does very well?
A= The author continued to stay on track while demonstrating the process of the whole
experiment. She maintained a very well structured essay in which its very difficult to not
understand. Very clear and direct
8. What are three revision suggestions you have for the writer?