Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Table of Contents
Lab # Topic/Title Skills Grade/10 Page #
7 Acids, Bases and Salts: Salt Prep. NH4Cl- Lab 11 (AMMONIUM LAB INSTEAD) (COMPLETE) AI, MM 13
9 Volumetric Analysis/Acid, Bases and Salts: Acid and Base Titration with Methyl Orange – Lab 18 ORR 17
(COMPLETE)
10 Electrolysis/Redox: CuSO4 with Cu Electrodes – Lab 24 (COMPLETE) AI, MM 19
11 Rates of Reaction: Effect of Concentration On Rate of Disappearance of A Cross - Lab 26 (COMPLETE) ORR 21
AIM: To plot a graph of solubility data and determine how the solubility of all NH4Cl varies with
temperature.
BACKGROUND: The solubility of a salt Is the mass of the salt dissolved. In 100g of solvent at a given
temperature. Generally, solubility increases with temperature.
DATA ANALYSIS:
1. On the grid provided, plot a graph of Temperature (x-axis) vs Solubility (y-axis). Use the graph to
answer the following questions.
4. Predict the mass of solute that would precipitate If the temperature is cooled from 60°C to 45.
At 60°C, 55 g of NH4Cl is dissolved
At 45°C, 48 g of NH4Cl is dissolved
55g – 48g = 7g
5. Calculate the minimum mass of water that would be needed to dissolve 45g of NH4Cl at 75°C.
At 75°C, 62.6 g of NH4Cl is dissolved in 100 g of water
Mass of Water = 45 g NH4Cl x 100 g water = 71.9 g water
62.6 g NH4Cl
3
4
6. Calculate the mass of NH4Cl that would be required to saturate 350g of water at 55°C.
At 55°C, 52.6g is dissolved in 100g
Mass of NH4Cl = 350 g water x 52.6 g NH4Cl = 184.1 g NH4Cl
100 g water
CONCLUSION: How did the temperature affect the solubility of the ammonium chloride? As the
temperature increases, the solubility of ammonium chloride increases.
5
AIM: To use paper chromatography to separate the components of screened methyl orange and
determine the Rf of each component
METHOD OR PROCEDURE:
1. A hole was pierced at the top of the chromatogram using a skewer. This was to allow the
chromatogram to be suspended in the beaker.
2. The beaker was filled with water to a height that would allow the baseline to remain above the
surface of the water.
3. A pin was used to dot a sample of the dye in the centre of the baseline.
4. The chromatogram was immersed in the beaker of water and the colour observations
5. were observed.
6. The Rf values of each separated colour were calculated.
Solvent Front
3.3 cm
Baseline
6
CALCULATE:
The Rf of the blue dye.
Rf of the blue dye = Distance travelled by solute
Distance travelled by solvent
= 3.3
4.3
= 0.77
DISCUSSION:
Explain the observations. Include at least one source of error.
The blue dye has a better retention factor than the yellow dye, according to research. The mobile phase
has a greater affinity for the blue solvent (the water solvent). The stationary phase has a greater affinity
for the yellow dye (filter paper). One source of error could be that the paper was tilted making the
solvent front uneven leading into an inaccurate Rf value.
CONCLUSION: State the colour of the and Rf of the components of the screened methyl orange. The
blue dye is more soluble than the yellow dye at a Rf value of 0.77 and 0.47 respectively. The blue dye has
a stronger affinity to the mobile phase and yellow dye has a stronger affinity to the stationary phase.
7
PROBLEM STATEMENT: Julian is a baker, while baking cookies one afternoon he argued with his
nephew as to which level in the oven his cookies would bake fastest: top vs middle vs bottom. Plan and
design an experiment to resolve the argument.
AIM: To identify which level in the oven his cookies would bake fastest: top, middle or bottom.
HYPOTHESIS: The top rack will bake the cookies the fastest.
METHOD OR PROCEDURE
1. Clean all apparatus and materials and start preparing the cookie dough.
2. Preheat oven to 375 °F (190οC). In a small bowl, stir together flour, baking soda, and baking
powder. Set aside.
3. In a large bowl, cream together the butter and sugar until smooth. Beat in egg and vanilla.
Gradually blend in the dry ingredients. Use ice cream scoop to measure equal amounts of cookie
dough and place onto ungreased cookie sheets.
4. Load each sheet with one cookie and label each the sheets “T”, “M”, “B” and put the “T” sheet
in the top rack in the oven.
5. Using the stopwatch and heat gun, record the time and stop the oven when middle of cookie
reaches an internal temperature reaches to 375°F (190°C).
6. Repeat with the following steps taken with sheet “T” with sheets “M” and “B” on the middle and
bottom rows respectively.
7. Record the results of both.
VARIABLES:
• Independent Variable: The rack the cookies are baked on.
• Dependent Variable: How fast the cookies on each rack cook.
• Constants/Control Variable: The amount cookie dough and the type of cookie dough.
TABLE SHOWING THE COMPARISONS OF THE TIME TAKE TAKEN BY COOKIE SHEETS TO BAKE
SHEET OBSERVATIONS TIME TAKEN
T
M
B
PRECAUTIONS
Clean all apparatus and materials.
8
ERROR/LIMITATIONS
The recipe used may affect the cooking time due to differing types and quantities of ingredients.
The oven's heating element does not stay on all the time and only emits intermittent bursts of intense
heat, this may affect the heat transfer to each rack.
EXPECTED RESULTS
It is expected that the cookies on the top rack will cook the fastest due to their proximity to the heaters
(electric oven) and due to hot air rising.
ASSUMPTIONS
Any error made while measuring the ingredient amounts will not majorly influence the results.
9
PROBLEM STATEMENT: On Valentine’s Day Ella received three different cards from secret admirers.
She suspected that all the cards were written with the same black ink. Plan and design an experiment to
confirm or deny Ella’s suspicions. Note that the ink is permanent i.e., it is insoluble in water.
AIM: To identify if all the cards were written with the identical black ink.
HYPOTHESIS: If the ink is identical across all cards the retention factor and separated colours of the ink
will be the same.
APPARATUS/MATERIALS: Three beakers, Isopropyl alcohol, Three dowel skewers, Ruler, and Paper
towels, Stopwatch.
VARIABLES:
• Independent Variable: The type of ink
• Dependent Variable: The retention factor and colour of the separated ink.
• Constants/Control variable: The type of alcohol
METHOD OR PROCEDURE
1. Orient each card into a “portrait” position and cut a small strip of paper from the card with the
ink present on it.
2. Label the strip from each card with “A”, “B” and “C”.
3. Using a pencil and ruler to measure accurately, draw a straight line (starting line) across the
paper, 1.5 cm above the bottom edge through the ink.
4. Label each beaker “A”, “B” and “C” respectively.
5. Take a dowel skewer and pierce the card strip 1 cm from the top
6. Set the dowel skewer on the beaker with the card strip in the beaker.
7. Pour the alcohol until it touches the starting line of the ink above the liquid level for the
experiment to work.
8. When the solvent front reaches the finish line, remove the paper from the beaker, being careful
to touch only the top. Let excess alcohol drip into the beaker.
9. Gently lay the chromatogram on a piece of paper towel.
10. Measure the distance (F value) between the starting line and the finish line or, the farthest up
that the solvent front reached. Record this distance.
11. Calculate the retention factor (Rf) for each spot and record the values.
EXPECTED RESULTS
It is expected that if all three cards use the same type of ink then they will have the identical retention
factors and colours of separated ink else they will differ.
10
DATA TO BE COLLECTED:
TABLE SHOWING THE RESULTS OF EACH CARD STRIP
CARD STRIP OBSERVATIONS DISTANCE TRAVELLED
A
B
C
TREATMENT OF RESULTS
Rf is the retention factor. Rf = distance travelled by colour/distance travelled by solvent.
If all three inks separated into the same colours and have the same retention factors, then the inks are
the same.
PRECAUTIONS
Wash your hands thoroughly to remove excess oils from your skin and gather the materials.
Handle the paper only on the edges to avoid leaving fingerprints, as these may hinder the elution
process.
Place the chromatography paper on a sheet of clean notebook paper or paper towel to avoid
contaminants.
When disposing of the isopropyl alcohol, pour the remaining alcohol back into an empty container to be
disposed of as flammable waste.
ERROR/LIMITATIONS
The cards may differ in material affecting the rate at which the solvent front is reached.
The length of time the card strips are left in the may differ due to error.
ASSUMPTIONS
There are no other substances on the card strips present to affect the values of retention factor.
11
INSTRUCTIONS: Conduct the following tests, record observations and write appropriate inferences. Be
sure to identify the oxidant and reductant in all tests.
CONCLUSION: What is the order of the reagents in increasing oxidizing power? The reagents in order
of increasing oxidizing power are: KI, FeSO4, H2O2 and KMnO4.
13
Aim: To observe the reaction between Ammonium Chloride and Sodium Hydroxide.
APPARATUS/MATERIALS: Red litmus paper, Blue litmus paper, Water, Test tube, Test tube holder,
Bunsen burner, Ammonium chloride crystals, Sodium hydroxide solution, Measuring cylinder.
METHOD OR PROCEDURE:
OBSERVATIONS:
Firstly, 5g of NH4Cl crystals and 20cm3 of NaOH solution were added to the test tube. When the NaOH
solution came in contact with NH4Cl no perceivable reaction occurred. Then, the test tube was heated. As
the test tube was heated a colourless gas seemed to escape. The moist red litmus paper was held over the
test tube causing the paper to turn blue, the same was done to the moist blue litmus paper however, it
remained blue.
DISCUSSION
1. Write the chemical equation for the reaction between NH4Cl and NaOH [2]
NH4Cl(s) + NaOH(aq) -> NH3(g) + H2O(l) + NaCl(aq)
2. Write the net ionic equation for the reaction between NH4Cl and NaOH [2]
NH4Cl(s) + Na+ (aq)+ OH-(aq) -> NH3(g) + H2O(l) + Na+ (aq)Cl-(aq)
NH4Cl(s) + Na+ (aq)+ OH-(aq) -> NH3(g) + H2O(l) + Na+ (aq)Cl (aq)
NH4Cl(s) + OH-(aq) -> NH3(g) + H2O(l) + Cl-(aq)
14
4. Why are slaked lime and ammonium-based fertilizers not added to soil at the same time?[4]
If you added a strong base like slaked lime also known as calcium hydroxide at the same time as
the ammonium-based fertilizers, then they would quickly react to release ammonia into the
atmosphere wasting the fertilizer.
CONCLUSION:
The reaction of Ammonium Chloride and Sodium Hydroxide is as follows. When they mixed and heated
ammonia gas (NH3), water (H2O) and sodium chloride (NaCl) were produced. The ammonia gas was found
to be alkaline and turning the moist red litmus paper blue.
15
PROBLEM STATEMENT: Friends argued at lunch one day about the acidity of two sodas, Campion cola
and Noipmac Chill. Some say Campion cola is more acidic while others said Noipmac Chill. Plan and
design an experiment to settle the argument.
AIM: To determine the which soda is more acidic; Noipmac Chill or Campion Cola.
HYPOTHESIS: The soda with the stronger acidity will require more sodium hydroxide to be neutralized.
VARIABLES:
• Independent Variable: The type of Cola
• Dependent Variable: The pH of each Cola
• Constants/Control variable: The amount and temperature of cola
METHOD OR PROCEDURE
1. Set up the apparatus. Ensure that the stopcock on the burette is closed.
2. Weigh 1.0g of sodium hydroxide and put it in a beaker. Add distilled water to the beaker until it
reaches the 250 cm3 level. Stir.
3. Use a funnel and add the sodium hydroxide solution to the burette and record the initial
amount.
4. Measure 60 cm3 of Noipmac Chill in a measuring cylinder then add it into the conical flask.
5. Add 2 drops of methyl orange to the conical flask. Note the colour of the solution.
6. Start adding the titrant to the soda while observing the solution for the colour change of the
indicator. Once the solution turns yellow, stop adding the sodium hydroxide solution.
7. Record the final volume on the burette.
8. Safely dispose of the remaining titrant and analyte and rinse the apparatus with distilled
9. water.
10. Repeat steps 3 to 8.
11. Repeats steps 2 to 9 using Campion Cola instead of Noipmac Chill.
EXPECTED RESULTS
It is expected the soda with the stronger acidity will require more sodium hydroxide to be neutralized.
This can be determined by calculating which of the two required more sodium hydroxide to be
neutralized. By subtracting the initial volume (cm3) from the final volume (cm3) in both titration results
and averaging the value the volume of sodium hydroxide can be determined. The soda with the higher
has the stronger acidity.
16
DATA TO BE COLLECTED:
TABLE SHOWING THE RESULTS OF TITRATION OF CAMPION COLA V.S NOIPMAC CHILL
SODA
Campion Cola Noipmac Chill
Titration 1 Titration 2 Titration 1 Titration 2
Initial Volume
(cm3)
Final Volume
(cm3)
Volume used
(cm3)
Average Volume
(cm3)
PRECAUTIONS
1. The sodium hydroxide solution is added to the soda at a slow and controlled rate to observe the
colour change in the indicator in order to more accurately determine when the neutralization
reaction has been completed.
2. If any of the sodium hydroxide comes in contact with the quickly rinse the affect area to prevent
any serious burns.
ERROR/LIMITATIONS
1. If titrant is added too quickly and a lot of excess is added to the solution long after the colour
change has taken place, then the calculations will be off.
2. After rinsing the apparatus with distilled water, a small amount could remain and contaminate
the sodas or sodium hydroxide solutions.
ASSUMPTIONS
1. It is assumed that there are no other factors other than the acid present in each cola affect the
results.
17
TITLE: Standardizing HCl using 0.05M Na2CO3 with methyl orange indicator.
METHOD OR PROCEDURE
1. The apparatus was cleaned and set up.
2. The burette was rinsed with HCl.
3. Paper towel was placed on the base of the stand then a conical flask was placed on it.
4. Pipette was rinsed with Na2CO3 then 20 ml of the base was measured and added to the conical
flask.
5. 2 drops of methyl orange were added to the conical flask.
6. The funnel was placed at the mouth of the burette and the burette was filled with HCl.
7. The initial reading was recorded then the funnel was removed.
8. The acid was titrated against the base, while swirling the conical flask. As it got closer to the
equivalence point the titration slowed down from pouring to adding drops.
9. The solution was observed until the colour change to pink occurred, then the titration
was stopped. The final volume was recorded.
10. The conical flask was rinsed.
11. Steps 4 to 9 were repeated 2 more times.
RESULTS:
TABLE SHOWING THE RESULTS OF TITRATION OF Na2CO3 USING HCl
Titrations Initial Burette Reading Final Burette Reading Volume used (cm3)
(cm3) (cm3)
1 50 34.9 15.1
2 50 33.2 16.8
3 50 32.8 17.2
DISCUSSION:
1. Write the chemical equation for the reaction.
Na2CO3 (aq) + 2HCl (aq) → 2NaCl (aq) + H2O (l) + CO2 (g)
4. Use the mole ratio to determine the moles of HCI in the average volume.
Mole ratio = 1 : 2
1 : 2 = 0.00125 : x
1x = 2 × 0.00125
X = 2.5 × 10-3 mol
CONCLUSION: State the concentration of HCI In mass and moles. The mass and moles of the
concentration of HCl are 2.71 g/dm3 and 0.074 mol dm3.
19
METHOD OR PROCEDURE
1. Apparatus was set up by attaching the wires to the power source, then the wires were attached
to electrodes.
2. 30ml of dilute copper sulphate was added to the beaker.
3. The electrodes were placed in the beaker, ensuring that they were half submerged in electrolyte
and were not touching.
4. The power source was switched on.
5. The electrolyte and electrodes were observed for any changes in size and colour.
6. Observations were recorded in a table.
OBSERVATIONS:
TABLE OF OBSERVATIONS FOR THE ELECTROLYSIS OF CuSO4 USING CU ELECTRODES.
Section Cathode Anode Electrolyte
Observations The cathode increased The anode decreased No changes occurred
in mass and a slight in mass and started to in the electrolyte.
colour change occurred. break down.
DISCUSSION:
1. In the space provided below construct a table explain the changes &/or processes occurring at
the cathode, anode and in the electrolyte. Your answer should include: half equations, type of
redox reaction, colour change and change in mass. These should be done where relevant.
Section Half Equations Type of redox Colour change Change in mass
reaction
Cathode Cu (s) →Cu2+ (aq) + Oxidization - Decreased in
2e- mass
Anode Cu2+ (aq) + 2e- → Reduction - Increased in mass
Cu (s)
Electrolyte - - No Colour change No change in
mass
2. If the process was allowed to continue for 20 minutes with a current of 5A, what mass of Copper
would be dissolved at the anode? [Cu: 64g/mol]
Time = 20 mins, Current = 5A, Mass = ?
C=A×S
20
C = 5 × 1200
C = 6000
96500 C : 1 mol
6000 C : 1 mol
2e- : Cu
2:1
0.062/2 = 0.031 mol of Cu
CONCLUSION: State the products of the electrolysis: The product of the electrolysis is copper solid
(Cu(s)).
21
TITLE: Investigating the effect of acid concentration on the rate of reaction between Na2S2O3, and HCI.
AIM: To Investigate the effect of acid concentration on the rate of reaction between Na2S2O3 and HCl.
APPARATUS/MATERIALS:
METHOD OR PROCEDURE
1. Set-up the apparatus as shown below.
2. Vary the volumes of HCI, H2O and Na2S203 according to the experiment number as indicated in
the table below.
3. Record the time it takes for the cross to disappear upon mixing the reactants.
22
RESULTS:
TABLE OF RESULTS FOR THE EFFECT OF ACID CONCENTRATION ON THE RATE OF REACTION
BETWEEN Na2S2O3 and HCl.
Experiment # Vol. of HCl Vol. of Na2S2O3 Vol of H2O Time/s 1/Time*10-2/s-1
1 50 50 0 40.89 2.45
2 45 50 5 48.32 2.07
3 40 50 10 43.7 2.29
4 35 50 15 45.93 2.18
5 30 50 20 53.06 1.88
6 25 50 25 57.03 1.75
7 20 50 30 58.42 1.71
8 15 50 35 74.0 1.35
9 10 50 40 76.0 1.32
10 5 50 45 110.0 0.91
DATA ANALYSIS:
1. On the grid provided, plot a graph of time (y-axis) vs volume of HCl (x-axis).
2. On the grid provided, plot a graph of 1/time (x-axis) vs volume of HCl (y-axis).
8. In the space provided contrast a table to show the set-up of the experiments if [Na2S2O3] was
varied instead of [HCl]. Remember a suitable title.
TABLE OF RESULTS FOR THE EFFECT OF ACID CONCENTRATION ON THE RATE OF REACTION
BETWEEN Na2S2O3 and HCl.
Experiment # Vol. of HCl Vol. of Na2S2O3 Vol of H2O
1 50 50 0
2 50 45 5
3 50 40 10
4 50 35 15
5 50 30 20
6 50 25 25
7 50 20 30
8 50 15 35
9 50 10 40
10 50 5 45
10. Write a balanced equation for the equation between HCl and Na2S2O3.
2HCl (aq) + Na2S2O3 (aq) → H2O (l) + S (s) + SO2 (g) + 2NaCl (aq)
CONCLUSION: State how the [Na2S2O3] affected the rate of the reaction. The relationship the Na2S2O3
and the rate of the reaction is directly proportional because as the concentration of Na2S2O3 decreases
so does the rate of the reaction.
26
TITLE: Investigating the Heat of Neutralization of 0.1M HNO3 and 0.1M NaOH.
AIM: To investigate the Heat of Neutralization of 0.1M HNO3 and 0.1M NaOH.
Apparatus and materials: beaker, thermometer, Styrofoam cup, stirring rod, 0.1M HNO 3 , 0.1M
NaOH and measuring cylinder.
BACKGROUND: The enthalpy of neutralization is the energy change which occurs when 1 mol of
water is formed from the reaction between an acid and a base under standard conditions. The
enthalpy of neutralization of a strong acid-strong base reaction is about -57.7kJ/mol. This
indicates that the reaction is exothermic.
METHOD OR PROCEDURE
1. Using the measuring cylinder, measure 25 cm3 of NaOH.
2. Fill the Styrofoam cup halfway with NaOH and take the temperature.
3. Measure the initial temperature and 25 cm3 of HNO3.
4. Pour 25 cm3 of acid into the NaOH-filled Styrofoam cup.
5. Stir the mixture and keep track of the greatest temperature you can get.
6. Make a table with the results.
RESULTS:
TABLE OF RESULTS FOR THE DISSOLUTION OF KI AND LICI.
Salt Mass of Salt Intial Temp. Final Temp ∆T
HNO3 25 30 30 0
NaOH 25 29 30 1
DISCUSSION:
1. Calculate the moles of NaOH used in the reaction.
Moles = volume × concentration
= 0.1M × 25 cm3
= 0.1 mol dm3 × 0.025 dm3
= 0.0025 mol NaOH
5. Calculate the heat change which occurs when 1 mol of water is produced.
Heat change : moles
210 : 0.0025
X:1
0.0025x = 210
X = 210/0.0025
X = 84000 J
X = 84 KJ
8. Why did the values you got for 5 and 6 above differ from the ones stated in the background?
The values in 5 and 6 differ from the ones in the background due to an experimental error
during the lab's execution. This is as a result of heat loss to the environment, resulting in an
erroneous reading when measuring the temperature of the solution.
9. In the space provided draw a labelled energy profile diagram for each dissolution?
28
CONCLUSION: State the enthalpy of neutralization calculated. The enthalpy of neutralization was
calculated to be -84000 J/-84 KJ.
29
AIM: To investigate the esterification reaction between ethanol and ethanoic acid.
TITLE: Investigating the esterification reaction between ethanol and ethanoic acid.
METHOD OR PROCEDURE
Set up the apparatus as shown below.
DISCUSSION:
1. Write the chemical equation for the reaction.
C2H5OH (aq) + CH₃COOH (aq) → CH5COOC2H5 (aq)
2. How could one obtain the ester from the reaction mixture?
Fractional distillation could be used to extract the ester from a reaction mixture of ethanoic
acid and alcohol.
3. How does the solubility of the ester differ from that of the acid?
The solubility of an ester differs from that of the acid because an ester's oxygen atoms can
establish hydrogen bonds with the hydrogen atoms of water molecules making the
ester is water-soluble.
31
CONCLUSION: State two properties of esters. Esters smell sweet and are greasy.
32
INSTRUCTIONS: Complete the following table of qualitative analysis on compound P with appropriate
observations and inferences.
CONCLUSION: What is the identity of the compound P? The identity of the unknown solid known as
compound P is Lead Nitrate.