As stated in the requirement and client’s request as well, you can use bullet points.

Please do

this to highlight MAIN POINTS for each presentation from slide 12-17 (client did not want

to include slide 13 which is triple constraints model)

Client also stated that:

Just spoken with timetabling and they have said they’re not looking into changing software at the

moment. There running the uni software on ‘Syllabus Plus’ and they understand this sofware is

slow. But going forward they said migrating the data to a mobile app will cause problems.

However I have them looking into other things for us from the LIS ( learning information

services ) about future online systems

They haven’t got an App up and running however they need a one-stop-shop App that allows

students and staff to answer. We can definitely bring this into the presentation now,especially in

the scoping

>> make sure that you have covered all these highlighted parts from client’s statement

Introduction

This part explores the applicability of one-stop-shop App by the school in the reduction of the

timetabling issues encountered by the school. Timetabling and the attendance will be

monitored by the App (Phillips et al., 2017). The emphasis of the presentation is the

scheduling of the resources and the management of the school budget, the cost of the
timetable and maintenance costs (Ruta et al., 2005). These are the major propelling elements

that form the baseline for the rebuilding of the application in several occasions (Nathuji et al.,

2009).

Budget acts as the main constrain, which limits the proposed application on how to work and

how to be developed (Chen et al., 2016). The cost of each and every domain of work is

broken into schedules, hence outputting the overall estimated cost (Nayan et al., 2017). The

scheduled is included at the integration level. At this level the school is to incur a huge

amount of money as this necessitated for the acquisition of new equipment that will hold the

application (Oude-Vrielink et al., 2016).

The resource migration domain outlines how the functionality of the application will be

applied (Oude-Vrielink et al., 2017). The application is to be utilised with the phones and

online resources. The distribution of the resource determines the rate of the assimilation of

the application. The online application of the timetable enhances the modernisation of the

application (Fonseca et al., 2018). During the migration of the resources, this impacts all

other applicants of the timetable. Hence, the momentary dependency on the online system

will aid in the mitigation of the challenge (Phillips et al., 2017).

Statistics indicate that the number of users of the internet is estimated to be over an eighth of

the global population (Fonseca et al., 2018). Hence, the workability of the application is high,

even though the direct switch over of the application may cause the school some system

drawbacks in data extraction as well the transfer of the data (Fonseca et al., 2018). The

utilisation of the one-stop-shop App is dictated by the numbers that are using the internet

(Fonseca et al., 2018). Consequently, the migration of the data to the appropriate database,

will expose both the school’s staff and students to the unlimited opportunities (Phillips et al.,

2017). Hence, the application offers a bed rock of opportunities to the school.
The analysis states that a sixty second search gives results that emanate from a variety of

sources, so the chances of obtaining the expected results are higher (Chen et al., 2016). The

retrieval process is massive and fast enough. The process will enable all the users of the App

easily and quickly access the information and knowledge that they are seeking. The

application guarantees the school the simplest method to answer the questions that the school

can offer both the students and the students (Fonseca et al., 2018).

Fonseca et al. (2018) indicated that the risk assessment is validated by the applications ease

of integration. Moreover, the security is assured on the school data and personal information

(Fonseca et al., 2018). However, the challenges seem to emanate from over budgeting of the

project, with implications on financial constraints and technical drawbacks. The budgeting of

the project created boundaries that could hinder further research of the application

capabilities (Fonseca et al., 2018). Financial constraints were vivid as the processing of the

financial support of the school was slower and a lot of time was wasted waiting for the

processing (Nathuji et al., 2009). Technical support was minimal as some of the gadgets used

confined to a particular field. Moreover, data migration necessitates for data moving from

one setting to the other.

The appraisal of the application validates that all the anticipated expectation of the

application are attained (Chen et al., 2016). The application aims at reengineering the

environmental changes of the school both virtually and physically, for a better and advanced

environment for research (Fonseca et al., 2018). The management appraisal is hinged on the

operational cost of the application, the modern application is anticipated to maximise on the

retrieval practices and reduce the various costs, like the maintenance cost (Chen et al., 2016).

The evaluation will be conducted by the applicants as to state the importance of the

application. This is vital as it states the rate of assimilation (Nayan et al., 2017).
In conclusion, the application has a lot of positive impacts to the school. The integration of

the application will enable the school to explore the information from other resources.

Moreover, the application will enable the school to cut cost of the acquisition of the

resources. The utilisation of the one-stop-shop App is the next step the school should take as

to solve the retrieval issues the school is encountering.

References

Chen, L., Chen, J., Jing, Y. and Li, D., 2016. Comprehensive appraisal and application of

novel extraction system for heavy rare earth separation on the basis of coordination

equilibrium effect. Hydrometallurgy, 165, pp.351-357.

Fonseca, J.F.P., Larsen, A., van der Hurk, E., Røpke, S. and Roberti, R., 2018. A matheuristic

approach for solving the Integrated Timetabling and Vehicle Scheduling Problem.

In VeRoLog 2017.

Mitton, C.R. and Donaldson, C., 2003. Setting priorities and allocating resources in health

regions: lessons from a project evaluating program budgeting and marginal analysis

(PBMA). Health Policy, 64(3), pp.335-348.

Nathuji, R., Schwan, K., Somani, A. and Joshi, Y., 2009. VPM tokens: virtual machine-aware

power budgeting in datacenters. Cluster computing, 12(2), pp.189-203.

Nayan, M., Hamilton, R.J., Juurlink, D.N., Finelli, A., Kulkarni, G.S. and Austin, P.C., 2017.

A critical appraisal of the application of propensity score methods in the urology

literature. BJU international

Oude Vrielink, R.A., Schepers, D., Jansen, E.A., Hans, E.W., van Hillegersberg, J., Burke,

E.K., Di Gaspero, L., Ozcan, E. and McCollum, B., 2016. Practices in Timetabling in Higher

Education Institutions.

Oude Vrielink, R.A., Jansen, E.A., Hans, E.W. and van Hillegersberg, J., 2017. Practices in

timetabling in higher education institutions: A systematic review. Annals of operations

research.

Phillips, A.E., Walker, C.G., Ehrgott, M. and Ryan, D.M., 2017. Integer programming for

minimal perturbation problems in university course timetabling. Annals of Operations

Research, 252(2), pp.283-304.

Ruta, D., Mitton, C., Bate, A. and Donaldson, C., 2005. Programme budgeting and marginal

analysis: bridging the divide between doctors and managers. BMJ: British Medical

Journal, 330(7506), p.1501.