GLOBALIZATION vis-à-vis IMPERIALISM

Is globalization defined as imperialism? Perhaps, are there any differences between these two
terms?
Imperialism and globalization are two ideas or concepts that are sometimes misinterpreted and
thought of as interchangeable by some. Others believed that imperialism was to blame for the rise of
globalization because it allowed powerful nations to establish trade networks that allowed for effective
commerce and the effective exchange of ideas and people. The influence of these activities on a
particular nation, if carried out, is one of many elements or things to be taken into account as to why these
two conceptions are entirely distinct.
The first reason why these two ideas are entirely different is the effect that these actions would
have on a certain country if they were carried out. Globalization is a result of human innovation and
technological advancements worldwide. It has a positive impact not only on a particular country but on
the world as a whole as it fosters social interconnectedness across existing physical and political barriers.
It promotes economic solidarity and connectivity by tying together human affairs and activities and
making it simple for businesses and companies to expand into new markets and diversify easily in other
countries. Most importantly, globalization encourages cultural diversity which opens up a better
understanding and respect for the unique cultural traditions of each country.
In contrast, imperialism is an idea, concept, or practice of expanding a nation’s authority and
influence through force, military dominance, or economic dominance. This concept has a negative notion
as it extends a forceful way of imposing thoughts, beliefs, or language where native culture and traditions
were wiped out and destroyed. This idea is unfavorable since it implies the eradication and destruction of
national culture and traditions in favor of imposing new ideas, ideologies, or languages through force.
Contrary to globalization, imperialism has led to division and disunity as dominant nations robbed
conquered nations of their natural resources and left them with little to nothing, worsening their hunger
and suffering. In addition, they were also exploited and taken advantage of, had no freedom, and were
forced to follow the mother country’s orders because of its immense power over them. One example of
the detrimental effects of imperialism is its impact on Africa where Africans were used as slaves, but
more so as cheap labor. Slave trade and social discrimination were also prevalent during those years.
Many of them passed away as a result of being relocated, exploited, seized against their will, and taken all
of their lands.
However, despite the disparities between these ideas or conceptions, there are certain parallels or
similarities that we could take into account. One of their similarities is the way they both foster
international rivalry or competition because each nation must assure its own geographic, cultural, social,
and economic security. It has also ushered many smaller countries onto the path of development.
In conclusion, it should be noted that globalization and imperialism do not mean the same thing,
and every one of us needs to recognize and comprehend the unique principles that each of them has to
offer. Imperialism may have some positive qualities, but in the long term, when greed replaces the
motivation for aiding another country, it destroys that country, and the acts of a small number of people
have a profound effect on future generations. The same is true of globalization, which, despite its positive
effects on society – among them reduced inequality and the support of new employment opportunities –
also causes job displacement. One result of globalization in this vastly changing world is that the rich get
richer while the poor get poorer. All things considered, these two terms both have pros and cons and if
taken for granted, everything will fail.