Strategy is defined by two famous writers. Kenichi Ohmae defines strategy as how a corporation differentiates itself from competitors by using its strengths to better satisfy customer needs, addressing both competitive positioning and building capabilities. Michael de Kare-Silver argues that strategy should have two elements: future intent and sources of advantage, with the sources of advantage emphasizing that capabilities only have value when they meet customer needs.
Strategy is defined by two famous writers. Kenichi Ohmae defines strategy as how a corporation differentiates itself from competitors by using its strengths to better satisfy customer needs, addressing both competitive positioning and building capabilities. Michael de Kare-Silver argues that strategy should have two elements: future intent and sources of advantage, with the sources of advantage emphasizing that capabilities only have value when they meet customer needs.
Strategy is defined by two famous writers. Kenichi Ohmae defines strategy as how a corporation differentiates itself from competitors by using its strengths to better satisfy customer needs, addressing both competitive positioning and building capabilities. Michael de Kare-Silver argues that strategy should have two elements: future intent and sources of advantage, with the sources of advantage emphasizing that capabilities only have value when they meet customer needs.
endeavors to differentiate itself positively from its competitors using its relative strengths to better satisfy customer needs. -Addresses both the competitive aspect of strategy and the need to build capabilities
Michael de Kare-Silver (1997)
-Strategy should have just two elements- future
intent and sources of advantage. He is therefore that intent and strategy are inseparable. The word (source of advantage) has a similar meaning to capability but emphasizes that capabilities only have value when they meet the real needs of customers