Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Concrete
High-Performance Concrete
P.-C.Aïtcin
Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
E & FN SPON
An Imprint of Routledge
London and New York
First published 1998 by E & FN Spon, an imprint of Routledge
11 New Fetter Lane, London SE4P 4EE
14.5.4
Use of a cement with a low heat of hydration 369
14.5.5
Use of hot water and insulated forms or heated
and insulated blankets under winter conditions 369
14.6 How to control thermal gradients 369
14.7 Concluding remarks 370
References 370
readily benefit from it. Most so-called books have an editor, or even
several editors, and contain a score or more of individual uncoordinated
papers sharing half a dozen key words. It is left to the reader to wander in
this jungle and to search for gems and pearls—but who is to set them into
a single ornament?
Aïtcin, single-handedly writing this volume, has given us an
enthusiastic but balanced picture of high-performance concrete, including
all its facets from the constituents and their interaction to the concrete in
service, and even a glimpse of it in the future. Thus the book will be
welcomed by all those involved in high-performance concrete: the
designer and the owner, the materials scientist, the concrete producer and
the contractor, as well as by those civil engineering generalists who aspire
to being au fait with the world around them.
Despite the author’s closing words to Chapter 2, the present book is a
treatise on high-performance concrete—there is none more exhaustive or
more detailed, or better. So, despite what I said in my opening paragraph,
I cannot but praise this book very warmly and recommend it
wholeheartedly to all who seek a better concrete future.
A.M.Neville
London, England
5 February 1997
Foreword
Yves Malier
From prehistoric times, men’s lives have been completely conditioned by
their ability to master the use of materials. In fact, quite early on, historians
differentiated the most active periods by giving them names such as
‘Stone Age’, ‘Bronze Age’ and ‘Iron Age’.
Several tens of thousands of years later, it is striking to note that the
advances in science (such as physics, chemistry and the life sciences) and
technology (such as the engineering fields and computer science) that
have marked the past 50 years and which will take us even further as the
third millennium begins, are largely based on themes closely linked to
materials.
Observing this evolution from prehistory to modern times, however,
we note that, within this continuity of the role of materials, there has been
a particularly marked difference in the approaches taken during the past
decade, whatever the fields of application. At present, our approaches are
more global—in certain cases, we speak of a ‘systems approach’—
whereby a scientific undertaking closely interrelates a number of different
fields, such as mathematics, physics, chemistry, geology and mechanics.
This kind of approach is interactive and free from the discrimination that
characterized the past, opening the way to considering simultaneously
construction design and implementation; components and their
constituent materials; the environmental parameters that determine
sustainability; and a global ‘material-design-construction-maintenance’
economic assessment.
Forty-five years ago, Albert Caquot, a member of the French Academy
of Sciences, introduced Professor Courbon’s structural calculus course at
the École Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées in Paris with this insight: ‘It is
through improving the characteristics of materials, much more so than
through advances being made in computing methods, no matter how
significant these may be, that the most radical changes in the construction
industry can be expected’.
Metals provide an example that, while somewhat beyond the scope of
this remark, is illustrative. The progress experienced in heavy industry
(automobiles, aeronautics, machine tools, household electrical appliances,
etc.) have depended on advances in materials. Engineers and researchers
Foreword xxiii
There were several difficulties in writing this book, a major one being
the poor quality of my written English. I must admit that after the
revisions of my initial drafts by S.Mindess and A.M.Neville, I was reading
almost the same English words or a few new ones that they replaced or
added, which I also knew well, but not exactly in the same order. I learned
painfully that it is difficult to think in one language and to write in another.
Hopefully, with their help my original thoughts have not been betrayed
but have been transformed into a decent English.
I also faced some difficulties in preparing a scientific treatise on high-
performance concrete. In spite of the apparent simplicity of usual concrete,
it is in fact a very complex material, and this is even more true for high-
performance concrete, in which several supplementary cementitious
materials can be used at the same time in conjunction with several
admixtures. Moreover, in some aspects high-performance concrete is both
so similar to, and yet so different from, usual concrete, that it has
sometimes been difficult to decide where to start and when to stop when
describing and analysing the properties of high-performance concrete.
I also had difficulties with the great variety of definitions and
terminology that are presently used world-wide. Consequently, I decided
to start this book with a chapter devoted to terminology. As I say later in
this first chapter, I am not claiming my terminology to be superior, but this
is the one that I prefer and that must be accepted, momentarily at least, in
order to understand what I have written.
During the past two or three years, I must admit, I have not been able to
read with enough attention all of the literature published on high-
performance concrete. This exercise would have been relatively easy in the
late 1980s and early 1990s, when I started writing the first chapter of this
book, but it is no longer true: as mentioned by Paul Zia, from 1974 to 1977,
97 papers were published on high-performance concrete, but from 1986 to
1989 the number went up to 471, and from 1990 to 1993 it shot up to 554!
This situation forced me to accelerate somewhat the writing of this book,
so as to prevent it from being outdated when printed.
I am aware that this book is somewhat incomplete, because I do not
master at the same level of comprehension all aspects of high-
performance concrete science and technology. I know that I have not cited
all the papers that I should have, and that I have given a too much
exposure to the work done at the Université de Sherbrooke by my
graduate students, my research assistants and my postdoctoral fellows.
This is so, not because I am convinced of the superiority of their work, but
simply because it is their work that I know the best and because I have the
easiest access to it. If some readers find that this book does not include the
most up-to-date information available, I apologize.
In spite of the great research effort that has been carried out world-wide
on high-performance concrete, it is clear that we do not yet have all the
answers to the scientific and technological challenges that have to be faced
when developing and using such a new material; high-performance
Preface xxvii
These principles are derived from the science of materials. Those readers
more interested in matters practical could omit this chapter, as it is not
essential to the proper production and use of high-performance concrete.
The following chapters of the book correspond to the different steps
followed by a high-performance concrete during its production,
transportation, placing, curing, hardening and service. The last three
chapters are devoted to special high-performance concretes, ultra high-
strength cement-based materials, and to the future of concrete in general
and high-performance concrete in particular.
Chapter 2 is an introduction to this book; it has been written as a kind of
executive summary in order to make a selective reading of the different
chapters easier for readers who might be short of time, or who do not want
to follow the development of the chapters as presented.
The field of high-performance concrete is vast, and human effort is
never perfect, as P.K.Mehta and P.J.-M Monteiro point out in the preface to
their book Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials. Therefore,
some readers may find shortcomings or discover omissions in this book. It
is hoped that these deficiencies can be made up for by referring to the
books, proceedings, reports and references that are listed at the end of each
chapter. These references are provided as a guide to further reading and to
provide a point of entry to the original scientific literature. Several
important subjects have deliberately not been covered, including
architectural high-performance concrete, repair and maintenance, and
non-destructive testing. Regrettably, I have very little experience of these
areas and prefer to leave it to others to write about them. Some of the latest
work on shrinkage and creep has been presented even though it is not yet
completed; however, I consider that the introduction of some of these new
concepts is important owing to their relevance to curing of high-
performance concrete.
When I was unable to distinguish between the significant and the
insignificant in an area with which I was not too familiar, I decided simply
to exclude this matter from this book. It will be the responsibility of the
reader to make up on his or her own such deficiencies.
I would like to add a word of caution: high-performance concrete is
evolving very fast, but our field experience is still limited. We must
therefore open our eyes and our minds to take advantage of the laboratory
and field experiences which have been the true drivers of the evolution of
our knowledge of high-performance concrete. However, we will also have
to take advantage of all of the sophisticated and powerful scientific
equipment presently available to observe high-performance concrete at a
micro- or even nanostructural scale, in order better to understand. As with
any kind of material, macroscale properties are linked to the most minute
microscale properties.
Pierre-Claude Aïtcin
Sherbrooke, February 1997
Acknowledgements
There are some individuals without whom this book could not have been
written, and others without whom it might have been very different. First
of all, there are my graduate students who year after year accumulated
data on high-performance concrete, and it is the least I can do to dedicate
this book to them. I am also in debt to John Albinger of Materials Services
who somehow inspired me as early as 1970 when I heard him speak for the
first time of high-strength concrete. Sidney Mindess has also played a key
role, when he asked me, with enough insistence to clear away all of my
objections, to write a book on high-performance concrete. I am not always
sure that I did well to listen to him. However, I must admit that he
supported me constantly over the years, not only by translating my
‘Frenglish’ into a decent English, but also by his criticisms, his remarks, his
advice and his encouragement; I desperately needed all of them.
I was greatly helped by Adam M.Neville, whose perfect knowledge of
both French and concrete enabled him to express in good English what he
interpreted to be my thoughts in French, written in poor English. I
appreciate his sharp and constructive criticisms, that improved
significantly not only the wording but also the scientific and technological
content of this book.
Another kind of indebtedness is to those who assisted me in the actual
production of the book. They are too numerous to list by name, but
Suzanne Navratil, Lise Morency, Sylvie Côté, Kathleen Lebeuf and
Christine Couture, who typed and retyped chapter after chapter, are
especially thanked for their work, as are my research assistants Mohamed
Lachemi and Philippe Fonollosa, who assisted me in producing the final
manuscript. Gilles Breton is responsible for the quality of the tables and
figures, because I have to admit that I am one of the last members of a
species on the way to extinction: a human being who doesn’t know how to
use a computer. I would like to thank Peter Gill for his careful
proofreading which has greatly improved the final version.
My research assistants of the Industrial Chair, Pierre Laplante,
Daniel Perraton, Michel Lessard, Moussa Baalbaki, Eric Dallaire, Serge
Lepage and my post-doctoral fellows, Omar Chaallal, Buquan Miao,
Pierre-Claver Nkinamubanzi, Guanshu Li and Shiping Jiang were also
very helpful in monitoring, collecting and interpreting a great body of
experimental results, with the help of the competent and dedicated
Acknowledgements xxxi
Terminology: some
personal choices
In the 1970s, when the compressive strength of the concrete used in the
columns of some high-rise buildings was higher than that of the usual
concretes used in construction, there is no doubt that it was legitimate to
call these new concretes ‘high-strength’ concretes. They were used only
because their strength was higher than that of the usual concretes generally
specified at that time. In fact, by present standards, they were only improved
usual concretes. They were made using the same technology as that used
to make usual concrete except that the materials used to make them were
carefully selected and controlled (Freedman, 1971; Perenchio, 1973; Blick,
Petersen and Winter, 1974).
However, when superplasticizers began to be used to decrease the water/
cement or water/binder ratios rather than being exclusively used as
fluidifiers for usual concretes, it was found that concretes with a very low
water/cement or water/binder ratio also had other improved characteristics,
such as higher flowability, higher elastic modulus, higher flexural strength,
lower permeability, improved abrasion resistance and better durability. Thus
the expression ‘high-strength concrete’ no longer adequately described the
overall improvement in the properties of this new family of concretes (Malier,
1992). Therefore the expression ‘high-performance concrete’ became more
and more widely used. However, the acceptance of this expression is not
yet general; for example, the name of ACI Committee 363 is still the High-
Strength Concrete committee and not High-Performance Concrete
committee.
Most of the detractors of the expression ‘high-performance concrete’
criticize this expression because it is too vague. What is the
‘performance’ of a concrete? How can it be measured? When using the
expression ‘high-strength concrete’ there is no misunderstanding
References 5
REFERENCES
Chern, J.C., Hwang, C.L. and Tsai, T.H. (1995) Research and
development of HPC in Taiwan. Concrete International,
17(10), October, 71–7.
Fig. 7.21 Iso cost graphs (CAN $/m 3 ) for silica fume
concretes for different silica
permission.
Nasser, K.W. and Kenyon, J.C. (1984) Why not 3×6 inch
cylinders for testing concrete compressive strength? ACI
Materials Journal, 81(1), January, 47–53.
CEB Model Code (1978) CEB FIP pour les Structures en Béton,
Bulletin d’information 124–125, pp. 14–16.
Holland, T.C., Krysa, A., Luther, M.D. and Liu, T.C. (1986)
Use of Silica-Fume Concrete to Repair Abrasion. Erosion
Damage in the Kinzua Dam Stilling Basin, ACI SP-91, Vol. 2,
pp. 841–63.