Dear Sir,

I am writing this letter regarding the closure of public facility in our town which was run by the local
newspaper. Through this letter I would like to inform you the importance of it to local people as well as
me and suggest some ideas in order to prevent from closing.

First and foremost, I would like to admit that I totally disagree with the idea of closing the public
facility as it does a great service to the public, more than meets the eye. As a plus point of public facility
is, it helps to people in poverty to check their health and get medical records at low cost. Also, the
establishments of phone booths allow people to make phone calls in an emergency without worrying
about asking from people if you could borrow their phone for a minute. For me, as a student I find it
horrible to carry a phone. Thus, I always use phone booths to make phone calls whenever I need to
contact my parents and it is always much easier than carrying a cell phone wherever I go.

Secondly, I would like to recommend few ways to keep the campaign going. By collaborating with
charity organizations and other local authorities would definitely help to prevent campaign from being
closed and to run successfully as it used to be. Thank you for taking my letter into consideration.

Yours faithfully,

Diyana.

In this 21st century, as a result of global modernization people are more likely to innovate new
technical equipment which will be utterly harmful for the nature. Because of this, there is a great
possibility of those unnatural things being harmful to not only to the nature but also to the whole living
creatures including us. In order to reduce the impact of the toxics, there is few strategies that could help
to reduce the consequences such as technology and recycling.

First and foremost, it is true that over the past decades people have achieved a lot in
technology. Thus, it would not be a big deal to reduce the toxic, if we were to use technology.
Moreover, by using nonharmful chemicals we could possibly invent new eco-friendly goods which would
do no harm to the nature. However, using technology would definitely cost a lot and take a considerable
time to put into practical use.

Secondly, recycling is one of the most important factors in reducing waste as it will not only
make people use goods again but also reduce from using new artificial stuff, which would definitely lead
to a decrease in the amount of toxic waste that being released to the nature. Furthermore, by adapting
to the strategy of recycling would be more beneficial than using technology as it would not cost any
extra money as well as a considerable time to put into action.

Nonetheless, taking the long-term benefits of each strategy, it is wise to choose recycling
as the most important one because it is a far more effective and costless method to reduce waste than
using technology.