Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PERLIS
SCHOOL OF MANUFACTURING
ENGINEERING
NUR ANISA
WASILAH
BINTI MOHD
NOOR SHAHRIN
MOHAMMAD
DANIALL HAKIMI
BIN INCHE
MOHAMMAD
DATAR
IMAN NUR HANIS
BINTI EMAM
MOHD TAWFEEK
NUR SUHAILA
BINTI SALIM
NUR SYAZWANA
BINTI SHAHRIZAL
HISHAM
2022
DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF
BIODEGRADABLE POTS AND CUPS
By
SEPTEMBER 2022
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First of all, we would want to express our gratitude to God for enabling us to complete the
assignment that was assigned to us by our lecturer. The group members put every resource they
had into finishing this project. Additionally, we would like to express our gratitude to our
lecturer, Mr. Mohd Shuhidan bin Saleh, for all the support and inspiration he provided to us in
order to complete the project. Without his direction, our project would not have been completed
properly. He consistently offers us encouragement and advice on how to complete our projects
so that the study that has been done will lead to worthwhile results. On the other side, we would
want to express our gratitude to our family members for their support in getting the project
done. They never let up in trying to motivate us to put our all into this project. Finally, we want
to express our profound gratitude to our dear friends who always work together to deliver
quality projects with all available resources and responsibilities. I hope that all of the
opportunities will be very beneficial to us and our group project. Last but not least, we would
like to thank all of our classmates for their assistance in helping us complete the survey. They
often offer suggestions and criticism so that we can make numerous improvements to our
project.
APPROVAL AND DECLARATION SHEET
By
Project Supervisor
Faculty of Mechanical
Engineering Universiti
Malaysia Perlis
SEPTEMBER 2021
ABSTRACT
Page
ACKNOWLEDEGMENT I
ABSTRACT III
ABSTRAK IV
TABLE OF CONTENTS V-
XIV
LIST OF TABLES X
b. Problem Statement 3
e. Expected Outcome 5
2.1 Introduction 6
3.1 Introduction 29
3.4.2 Method 35
CHAPTER 1: BACKGROUND OF THE PROJECT
1.1: INTRODUCTION
The tremendous manufacture of plastics over the past 60 years has produced a
vast amount of waste on a global scale. In 2015, more than 320 million tonnes
of polymers were created worldwide, but sadly, less than 10% of these plastics
are really recycled, and a significant amount are accumulating in landfills or
being discarded into the environment as litter [1]. Plastics made from non-
renewable petroleum are employed in a wide range of industries. Direct
coverings, greenhouse covering films, soil mulching and solarization films,
silage films, shading and protective nets, nets for harvesting and post-harvesting
operations, irrigation and drainage pipes, strings and ropes, pots, packaging
containers, and sacks are just a few examples of the numerous plastic products
used in modern agriculture [2,3].
Similarly, pots based on biodegradable polymers will also biodegrade when placed in the
ground. This chapter reviews the latest findings on biopots (i.e. biodegradable planting pots)
based on bioplastics, and also those based on industrial and agricultural waste. Bioplastics
usually with addition of different reinforcements, such as plant or wood fibers, are a potential
alternative to conventional petroleum-based pots. Also, the use of diverse types of solid
residues, such as wood fiber, coconut fiber or coir, rice hull, manure, peat, soil wrap, and
straw, in the production chain of novel sustainable products could contribute to the
development of modern agriculture.
The main thing to consider is that it is necessary to offer rapid biodegradation of planting
biopots in soil to avoid their accumulation and root circling while increasing biopots water
use efficiency when rising plants. In terms of plant growth and functionality, biodegradable
containers can represent a good alternative to replace petroleum-based plastics used for
horticulture and floriculture containers.
Two specific objectives have been defined to simplify the main objective of the
project:
This project was carried out to design and development of biodegradable pots and cups
focusing on the following steps:
1. Make research about biodegradable pots and cups and imagine the designs of the
pots.
2. Collect all the data to solve the problems using biodegradable pots and cups.
3. Make a design and evaluate the idea of making a biodegradable pots and cups
4. Choose the best design and the suitable one for the pots.
6. Get the project items from supplier and running the project.
Methodology
3.1 Introduction
In this chapter we will discuss about how we start this project and
complete this project. We are starting from collecting data to finishing the
product. We will also discuss the project planning to accomplish the task
more smoothly in this chapter. The most important part in this chapter is to
find out the customers’ need to make sure the product is prefect and in
popular. The quality and values of the product also will be guarantee. I will
refer to the customer’s need based on the analysis from the google form.
The detail of the product also will attached in this chapter.
Project Tittle
In this project, the implementing process is broken down into three phases. The flowchart
below depicts the three phases. Research is done at the first stage in order to gather facts and
information. The professor, the Internet, and the electronic library are all sources of data and
information. The yield of product design specification is the following stage (PDS).
The second stage is machine design, which included the machine's frame, supporting
infrastructure, and mechanical components. Selecting material is the following stage. To create
the ideal product, the stronger, more affordable, and chemically resistant materials are used.
Analyzing the performance is the third phase. The analysis is based on how effectively and
successfully the machine performs when bending the work item. Finding the conclusion is the
final stage.
Flowchart of project
After discussion with all teammates and research, all the data and information collected can
allow me to identity the product I want to invent. One problem when sowing into traditional
pots is the root growth of seedlings can be impacted if they are not transplanted early enough,
with spiralling of the roots becoming a common issue. By contrast, the fibrous pots allow the
roots of seedlings to push through the sides of the pot, which in turn promotes healthy and
even root growth.
Step 2: Produce Product Design Specification
The Pugh selection method is used to evaluate the concepts and the control system for the
product. The detail drawing will then be created using CATIA V5R21 software, and the final
concept will be produced.
Better materials are picked to build products with superior performance utilising the Pugh
selection process. To reduce the product's absorption costs, low-cost materials were also
chosen.
Step 5: Analysis
We'll examine the product's functionality and identify any issues with it. If the product
performs flawlessly, then our purpose will have been accomplished and a conclusion formed.
Flowchart of project planning
3.4 Quality Function Deployment
3.4.2 Method
80 participants (Teacher, Lecturer, Student and so on)
took part in this survey. In order to truly understand the needs
of customers, they were asked to fill out the survey form we
have already done. We also provided a suggestion form for
customer to let us know biodegradable pots that the customer
really wanted so for the improvement of product, we can
clearly understand their needs. In this section, they only need
to fill out the form by their mean.
After doing survey, I know the need of customers as long as the customer requirements for
Biodegradable Pots And Cups. Thus, the product specifications will be as below:
Design
Requirements
Importance weight
environment
Easy to use
Recyclable
Affordable
Material
Stability
Safe
Design
factor
Customer
Requirements
FUNCTION 4 3 3 1 9 9
STABILITY 4 3 9 9
SAFETY 5 9 9
SIZE 3 1 3 3
MATERIAL 4 3 9 9 9
COST 2 9 1
22
RAW SCORE (435) 27 57 49 30 83 72 117
RELATIVE WEIGHT % 6.21 13.10 11.26 6.90 19.08 16.55 26.90
RANK ORDER 7 4 5 6 2 3 1
Column1 Column2
9 Strong
3 Medium
1 Weak
Increase
Decrease
Explore Systematically
Reflect on the
solutions and the
process
Parts are divided into two primary bodies in the designed concept. The cover for
the hydraulic component comes first, followed by the cover for the body frame
component. The concept is created based on a number of standards that satisfy the
needs of the client.
3.1.1 Concept Selection
Design concept
Pung Concept Importance Pots and Cups Designed Designed Desighed Desighed
Selection Matrix weight organic concept concept concept concept
factor 1 2 3 4
(DATUM)
Size of product 2 S - S + -
Environmentally 4 S - + S -
friendly
Weight 3 S S + + S
Cost 4 S + + - +
Easy to carry 2 S S S S S
Design
Criteria Pot 4 S - - + -
dissolves naturally
Safety 3 S - - + -
features
Easily recognizable 2 S S S + S
Safe to use 3 S + - S +
More ecosystems 4 S - - S -
# of pluses (+) 2 3 6 2
# of minuses (-) 6 5 2 6
# of minuses (-) 21 18 8 21
Based on the Pugh chart, ‘+’ is equal to better and ‘++’ is equal to best ; ‘-’ is equal to
poorer and ‘--’ is equal to worst ; ‘S’ is equal to same while the ‘total’ (use ‘+’ to
minus ‘- ‘) represents that the overall score that ranked by considering product design
scores ‘S’ for all criteria.The total score for DATUM is 35. From the 1 Pugh Chart,
we had add on the additional criterion, which is more ecosystem to assign the score.The
evaluation performed in pugh chart indicates the designed concept 3, 2 and 1 are tied
for first place with score=10 , and followed by designed concept 2 with score=-7 and
Design concept
Size of product 2 S S ++
Environmentally 4 S + S
friendly
Weight 3 S + +
Cost 4 S - S
Safe for nature 4 S -- +
Easy to carry 2 S S S
Design
Pot 4 S - -
Criteria
dissolves naturally
Safety 3 S -- +
features
Easily recognizable 2 S - +
Safe to use 3 S - S
More ecosystems 4 S - S
For Weight :
# of pluses (+) 2 5
# of minuses (-) 7 1
# of minuses (-) 24 4
We build the 2nd Pugh Chart with eliminate the design concept 1 since it gets the
lowest score and it becomes less attractive in order to discriminate between the
options and criteria can be weighted. Then, in order to choose the best concept, we
use designed concept 3 as our new DATUM since it has the highest number of
positives.From the 2nd Pugh Chart, obviously the designed concept 2 has been
canceled after the use of weight. It also shows that the remaining one options which is
designed concept 2 are very close with total score -17. We can say these
we have designed fulfil and meet most of the requirement design criteria. This best
After the concept is selected, the detail drawings are produced by parts to let us know more about
the details of the concept. The drawings will be attached in behind.