You are on page 1of 4

Page |1

FACULTY OF PHARMACY
BIOCHEMISTRY PPCC 6430304
YEAR 2, SEMESTER 1
SESSION 2022-2023
Assignment Topic
“ A 57 year old woman presents to the primary care clinic for a routine checkup. Her
medications include Alendronate, Aspirin, Metformin, and Simvastatin. Her physician
notes that her LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) has dropped since her last visit, putting her within
the target level <70 mg/dL”.

Q-1. By which of the mechanisms does this drug regimen most likely lower LDL-C levels
in this patient and why?

Q-2. Explain the main pathway to control the LDL-Cholesterol.


Q-3. Impaired “Oxidation of Fatty Acids” gives rise to diseases often associated with
Hypoglycemia” How to manage the diseases?

Q-4 Summarize the key points for Oxidation of Fatty Acids.


Page |2

Serial Number

AIMST UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF PHARMACY

<< COURSE NAME >>

<<CASE STUDY TITLE >>

<< STUDENT’S NAME >>

<< MATRIC NUMBER >>

<< CASE STUDY SUBMISSION DATE >>

<< LECTURER’S NAME >>

EVALUATION

Attributes Marks
1
2
3
4
5
Evaluated by

_______________________________
TOTAL Name:
MARKS Date :
Page |3

Important note :

Please do not copy from others, write in your own version.

Hand written

SUBMISSION DATE : 17-01-2023

FORMATTING GUIDELINES:

• Minimum 1000 words

• Reference styles: Vancouver style (numeric)

• Font –Times new roman – running matter- 12 , Title bold and capital - 14 and Subtitle -
12 (bold and capital)

• Space--- 1.5 spacing for text. Single spacing may be used for tables

• Page numbering

a. Placed 1 cm from bottom, in the centre at footer


b. Font must be the same as that used for Text
c. Page number for Text and References are Arabic numerals (1, 2, 3, 4…)
 Alignment : justify
 Page layout: margin –Normal or normal with 1.5 on left side if necessary
 Paper Size: A4
 Orientation: Portrait, In case of large table’s landscape may be used.
Page |4

Rubrics for Critical Thinking & Problem solving


Topic of Assignment :
Student ID No :
Evaluator :

Points Scale (maximum points 30) Total


Sub- Marks
5 (Very good) 4 (Good) 3 (Fair) 2 (Weak) 1 (Very weak)
attributes
Problem Able to provide Independently able to Able to explain a problem Able to partially explain a Not able to explain a
Identification explanation of explain a problem with minimum assistance. problem with maximum problem, even with
problem very clearly and clearly without assistance. assistance
accurately. assistance.
Analysis Able to organize and Able to organize and Able to organize and Finds difficulty in organizing Not able to organize and
analyze gathered analyze gathered analyze gathered and analyzing gathered analyze gathered
information or data, clearly information or data, information or data, but information or data and information or data and
describe the factors that clearly describe some does not clearly describe finds difficulty in explaining fails to define the factors
contribute to problem/ issue factors that contribute the factors that contribute the factors that neither that contribute to the
or explain the root of the to problem/ issue or to the problem/issue or contribute to the problem/ problem/issue or explain
problem. explain the possible clearly explain the root of issue nor explains the root the root of the problem
roots of the problem. the problem. of the problem.
Application Able to apply new idea or Able to apply new idea Able to apply new idea or Limited ability to apply new Not able to apply any new
knowledge to a given or knowledge to a knowledge to a given idea or knowledge. idea or knowledge to a
problem and able to given problem problem with assistance given problem.
propose alternative independently. from the lecturer.
applications.
Able to gather and
Synthesis Able to gather and Able to gather relevant Has difficulty in gathering, Fails to gather information
thinks about
and evaluates information, information, synthesize synthesizing and evaluating for synthesis and
information,
Evaluation chooses a clear and evaluate the information. evaluation
synthesize, able to
interpretation, and provides information and offers
offer responsible
sufficient evidence (quality simple, unsupported
interpretations;
and quantity) to support conclusions
provides sufficient
conclusions.
evidence to
support
conclusions
Decision Able to make excellent Able to make good Able to make decisions Able to make decisions Not able to make decisions
Making decisions based on decisions based on based on comparison and based on comparison and based on comparison and
comparison and contrast comparison and contrast between contrast between contrast between
between information, contrast between information, ideas and information, ideas and information, ideas and
identify problems and information, ideas and available solutions. available solutions with solutions even with
available solutions. available solutions. some assistance. assistance.
Reference Accurate and consistent Accurate and Less accurate and less More inaccurate and more Not Accurate and not
(Vancouver) style throughout. consistent style consistent style. inconsistent style. consistent style.
mostly.
*The total 30 marks will be converted according to individual course assessment weightage Total score: ………………/30 marks*

You might also like