Footbridge Calculation

DESIGN NOTE
COMPOSITE FOOTBRIDGE
Company : Absolute Barrkee Industries

User name : Eng. Mohamed Mamadu Jan Jalloh
Project name : Helbert Williams -Building footbridge-Sewa Grounds
Project reference :
Comment :
Date : 28/09/2022
Absolute Barrkee Industries - Eng. Mohamed Mamadu Jan Jalloh
CTICM
(v5.01)
Project reference :
Composite Bridge Design .
Comment :
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SOFTWARE
Purpose of software
The CTICM software is used for design of the rolled-steel main beams of a composite steel and concrete bridge superstructure. It is intended
as a means of checking the feasibility of a design solution, optimizing design through appropriate choice of parameters, and estimating the
main quantities involved.
Scope of application
The kinds of bridges handled are road bridges, railway bridges, and footbridges with superstructures made made out of steel rolled girders and a
participating reinforced concrete slab or with filler-beam decks. Decks may be simply supported or continuous in the case of multi-span bridges.
Calculations and verifications are performed in accordance with Eurocodes EN and National Annexes.
Method of analysis and design checks
On the basis of a definition of bridge geometry, materials, and loads, the program calculates internal forces and moments in the main beams under the
effect of: dead load, superimposed dead load and live load; concrete shrinkage; temperature differential; any support height adjustment. The analysis is
performed with a finite element solver, using a grid model. The structure is discretized by bar elements corresponding to segments of the main beams,
longitudinal and transverse strips of slab, and any crossbeams. For calculating flexural and torsional stiffnesses, account is taken of creep and any concrete
cracking, depending on the type of internal forces or moments. Longitudinal and transverse influence lines are used to determine the position of mobile
loads producing extreme effects at the different cross-sections considered.
To establish design of beams, the program calculates the main load combinations for the bridge in the in-service phase. The design checks for
the serviceability limit state and ultimate limit state concern stresses in the beams and in the longitudinal reinforcement, compressive stresses in the
concrete, the ultimate moment resistance, crack control and the vertical deformation and stress variation in beams at the fatigue limit state. The software
also calculates reactions at supports and the number of connectors required to transfer shear forces between the beams and the slab. For filler-beam
decks, the calculations include a number of special features in accordance with the specifications of the design codes.
CTICM, Centre Technique Industriel de la Construction Métallique, France.
Software use conditions apply

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 1 / 78
Project reference :
Comment :
DATA
FOOTBRIDGE - Conventional beam and slab superstructure
Eurocodes EN
1 span Span length = 8.000 m
Slab dimensions
Width = 2.000 m Thickness = 15.0 cm
2 beam lines (Distance to left-hand edge of deck slab)
Line 1 : 0.050 m
Centre distance = 1.899 m
Line 2 : 1.949 m
Precast concrete panel : Thickness of precast concrete panel = 0.3 cm
Propping : No propping of main beams during deck slab concreting.
Reinforcement
Layer Top Bottom

Rebars diameter (mm) 12.0 12.0
Rebars spacing (mm) 200.0 200.0
Concrete coverage (mm) 40.0 40.0
Concrete coverage :
- from the top face of the slab for the top layer
- from the upper face of the precast slab for the bottom layer
Shear studs : Ø16x100 (PRd= 52.7 kN)
2
Reinforcing steel fy = 500.00 N/mm
Structural steel S355 (WITH reduction of yield strength with thickness)

3
Density = 7850 kg/m
Concrete Class C25/30

3
Density = 2650 kg/m
-6
Shrinkage strain = 200.10
Temperature difference between slab and beams = 10 °C
Material properties used in calculations
Yield strength of the steel of girders fy = 355.0 MPa

Yield strength of the reinforcing steel fy = 500.0 MPa
Modulus of elasticity Ecm = 31476 MPa

Limit compressive strenght of concrete fck = 25 MPa

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 2 / 80
E:\...\
Project reference :
Comment :
Steel sections
span 1 Left-hand edge beam IPE 200

Right-hand edge beam IPE 200
Cracked regions
Support lines LH side (m) RH side (m)

C0 - -
C1 - -
Superimposed dead loads of deck surfacing or ballast, footways or maintenance walkways etc - SDL1
3
Waterproofing Thickness = 1.5 cm Density = 2400.0 kg/m
3
Surfacing Thickness = 2.5 cm Density = 2400.0 kg/m
Parapets left-hand side x = 0.00 m q = 1.00 kN/m

right-hand side x = 0.00 m q = 1.00 kN/m
Live loads for the footbridge
Calculation according to EN 1991-2:2003 5.3.2.1

2 2
Values of the applied surface load between 5.00 kN/m and 5.00 kN/m
Vehicles moving on footbridge
Vehicle on bridge not taken into account in calculation.
Support height ajustments and settlements
Height adjustments Settlements 1 Settlements 2
Support line No. 0 0 mm 0 mm 0 mm
Support line No. 1 0 mm 0 mm 0 mm

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 3 / 78
.
Project reference :
Comment :
Assumptions for calculation and checks
Calculation coefficients
Diaphragms Coefficient for inertia = 0.10

Coefficient for mass = 0.10
Slab elements Coefficient for inertia - longitudinal = 1.00

Coefficient for inertia - transverse = 1.00
Serviceability Limit States
Deflection due to live loads limited to 1/ 300 of span length
Partial safety factor for the structural steel γM,ser = 1.00

Partial safety factor for shear resistance of studs γv = 1.25
Ultimate Limit States
Partial safety factors :

for sections resistance γM0 = 1.00
for buckling resistance γM1 = 1.10
for slab concrete strength γc = 1.50
for shear resistance of studs γM = 1.15
IPE 200 Line 2
y
IPE 200 Line 1
x
8.000
Span No. 1

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 4 / 78
Project reference :
Comment :
Weighting factors for SDL1 :
Increase Reduction
Waterproofing 1.20 0.80
Surfacing 1.40 0.80
Partial factors for loads - Combination factors :
Partial factors for loads (ULS) :
Permanent loads γG = 1.35

Traffic loads γQ = 1.35
Other variable loads γQ = 1.50
Height adjustments γP = 1.00
Settlements γG,set = 1.20
Shrinkage γS = 1.00
Combination factors :
Ψ0 Ψ1 Ψ2 Ψ'1
gr1a 0.40 0.40 0.00 0.80
gr2 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
TK 0.60 0.60 0.50
1. kN/m 1. kN/m
z
y
x=0 m
0.350
IPE 200 IPE 200
0.050 1.949
2.000
Line 1 Line 2
0.050 1.899 0.051
2.000

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 5 / 78
E:\...\DESKTOP\NEW FILES\LAVORO\SIERRA LEONE\GIALLO\FOOT BRIDGE\8M.APM
Project reference :
Comment :
LIST OF LOAD CASES
No. Symbol Name of load case Modular ratio
1 G Self-weight -
2 GS SDL1 19.94
3 GS+ Increased SDL1 19.94
4 GS- Reduced SDL1 19.94
5 GL SDL2 19.94
6 SH Concrete shrinkage 20.19
7 TH+ Simpl. temp. load +DT°C 6.67
8 TH- Simpl. temp. load -DT°C 6.67
9 Eigenmode 6.67
10 CPAS Load on footbridge 6.67

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 6 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
LIST OF ULS COMBINATIONS
ULS combinations
1 3 4 5 6 7 8 10
G GS+ GS- GL SH TH+ TH- CPAS
1 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35
2 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35
3 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.50 0.54
4 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.50 0.54
5 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.50 0.54
6 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.50 0.54
7 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.00 1.35
8 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.00 1.35
9 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.00 1.50 0.54
10 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.00 1.50 0.54
11 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.00 1.50 0.54
12 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.00 1.50 0.54

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 7 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
LIST OF SLS COMBINATIONS
Characteristics SLS combinations

1 3 4 5 6 7 8 10
1 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 1.00
2 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 1.00
3 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 1.00
4 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 1.00
5 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.40
6 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.40
7 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.40
8 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.40
9 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 1.00
10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 1.00
11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 1.00
12 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 1.00
13 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.40
14 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.40
15 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.40
16 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.40

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 8 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Frequent SLS combinations

1 3 4 5 6 7 8 10
17 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.40
18 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.40
19 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.40
20 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.40
21 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.40
22 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.40
23 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.40
24 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.40

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 9 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Quasi-permanent SLS combinations

1 3 4 5 6 7 8 10
25 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
26 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
27 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50
28 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50
29 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50
30 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50
31 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
32 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50
34 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50
35 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50
36 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 10 / 78
.
Project reference :
Comment :
Infrequent SLS combinations

1 3 4 5 6 7 8 10
37 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 0.80
38 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 0.80
39 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 0.80
40 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 0.80
41 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 0.80
42 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 0.80
43 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 0.80
44 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 0.80

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 11 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
ESTIMATED QUANTITIES
Structural steel sections :
Steel grade : S355
Lengths (m)
Position Span Number Profile Nominal On/Under Sum Weight (t) Pre-camber (cm)
1 1 2 IPE 200 8.00 0.20 8.20 0.367 6.4
0.367
Shear connectors :
Position Span Number Weight (t)

1 1 166 0.032
0.032
Slab concrete :
2
Surface of slab : 16.00 m
3
Position Span Volume (m )
1 1 2.4
2.4
NB :
- The indicated beam lengths and pre-cambers correspond to span lengths.

Supply specifications may differ, depending on the position of any splices.
Constraints associated with fabrication, finishing, transport, and handling are to be checked on a case-by-case basis.
- The quantities indicated for beams do not include stiffeners, bearing plates, diaphragms, end plates, etc.
These items are to be added in accordance with the features of the structure.
- The number of shear connectors given includes a flat 30% increase over the theoretical quantity
to take account of fabrication practice.
- The concrete of the precast deck panels is included

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 12 / 78
Project reference :
Comment :
Mass on slab :
Waterproofing (t) Surfacing (t) Footways (t) Subtotal (t)

0.576 0.960 0.000 1.536

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 13 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
NUMBER OF CONNECTORS
Number of shear connectors according to User definition :
Ø16x100 : d = 16.0 mm - h = 100.0 mm - m = 0.2 kg/unit
span Row 1 Row 2 Total Weight (t)

1 82 84 166 0.032

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 14 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
LIST OF CROSS-SECTIONS OF INTEREST
Bridge length : 8.00 m ( 7 cross-sections of interest)
Section No. Position (m) Type span
1 0.00 Origin abutment
2 1.20 Limit of support region

3 2.00 Diaphragm
4 4.00 Diaphragm 1
5 6.00 Diaphragm
6 6.80 Limit of support region
7 8.00 End abutment

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 15 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
SLAB CRACKING
According to : EN 1994-2 Tables 7.1 and 7.2

Maximum bar diameter φmax = 22. mm (Girder 1 - Node line 1)
Maximum bar spacing emax = 200. mm (Girder 1 - Node line 1)

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 16 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
CROSS-SECTION CHARACTERISTICS
Beam line No. : 1

Section No. : 1
Node line No. : 1
Type of cross-section : Support
Position : 0.00 m Origin abutment
Effective slab width … for internal force and moment calculation (1) : 0.93 m
… for stress calculation (2) : 0.70 m
Concrete state Casting Uncracked Cracked

Loads Permanent Permanent Live -
Modular ratio - 6.67 19.94 20.19 6.67
S. modulus, top flange (cm3) (2) -194. 2490. 6153. 6354. 2490. -647.
S. modulus, bottom fibre (cm3) (2) 194. 491. 402. 402. 491. 287.
S. modulus, concrete slab (cm3) (2) -8094. -12623. -12679. -8094.
S. modulus, top reinf. layer (cm3) (2) -232.
Shear area (cm2) 14.00
Plastic moment (M > 0) (kN.m) (2) 202. 202. 202. 202.
Plastic moment (M < 0) (kN.m) (2) 124.
Plastic neutral axis (M > 0) (mm) (2) 248.70 248.70 248.70 248.70
Plastic neutral axis (M < 0) (mm) (2) 185.83
Elastic neutral axis (mm) (1) 100.00 254.96 224.69 224.24 254.96
Bending moment of inertia (cm4) (1) 1943. 13423. 9446. 9408. 13423.
Torsional moment of inertia (cm4) (1) 6.98 7386.72 2476.02 2445.68 7386.72
Cross-sectional area (cm2) (1) 28.48 233.39 97.04 96.20 233.39
Bending moment of inertia (cm4) (2) 1943. 12237. 8609. 8573. 12237. 3972.
Elastic neutral axis (mm) (2) 100.00 249.14 213.99 213.49 249.14 138.59
Cross-sectional area (cm2) (2) 28.48 183.74 80.43 79.79 183.74 36.45
Static moment (cm3) (2) 424.81 324.69 323.27 424.81 2141.20
Δσ EN 1994-2 7.4 (3) (MPa) (2) 50.97
NB : - Section modulus is positive for fibres below elastic neutral axis.

- Section modulus is negative for fibres above elastic neutral axis.
- The position of the neutral axis is measured from the bottom fibre of the bottom steel section flange.

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 17 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
INTERNAL FORCES AND MOMENTS IN CROSS-SECTION OF INTEREST
Beam line No. : 1 M: Bending moment

Section No. : 1 V: Shear force
Node line No. : 1 d: Deflection
Type of cross-section : Support n: Modular ratio
PERMANENT LOADS
left-hand side right-hand side

Load case n M (kN.m) V (kN) M (kN.m) V (kN) d (cm)
Self-weight - 0.00 -15.26 0.00
SDL1 19.94 0.00 -3.27 0.00
Increased SDL1 19.94 0.00 -4.34 0.00
Reduced SDL1 19.94 0.00 -2.62 0.00
SDL2 19.94 0.00 -3.52 0.00
Concrete shrinkage 20.19 14.79 0.97 0.00
primary effect 14.86
secondary effect -0.07 0.97
axial force - slab N = -284.40 kN
Simpl. temp. load +DT°C 6.67 -9.17 -1.04 0.00
primary effect -9.27
secondary effect 0.10 -1.04
axial force - slab N = 430.31 kN
Simpl. temp. load -DT°C 6.67 9.17 1.04 0.00
primary effect 9.27
LIVE LOADS Modular ratio = 6.67

Mmax Mmin Vmax Vmin Vmax Vmin d
Load case (kN.m) (kN.m) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (cm)
Load on footbridge 0.00 0.00 -16.98 0.00 0.00

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 18 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
CHECKING CROSS-SECTION OF INTEREST
Beam line No. : 1

Section No. : 1
Node line No. : 1
SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE Value Limit Ratio Combination

Deflections (m) 0.000 0.027 0.00 -
Minimum reinforcement (%) 0.44 0.77 0.57 -
Slab cracking φmax = 22. mm or emax = 200. mm No.17
Compressive stress in top fibre of concrete (MPa) -1.30 15.00 0.09 No.16
Tensile stress in reinforcement (top layer) (MPa) 50.87 300.00 0.17 No.13
Stress in top fibre of steel section (MPa) -41.99 355.00 0.12 No.15
Stress in bottom fibre of steel section (MPa) 7.49 355.00 0.02 No.16
Shear stress in steel sections (MPa) -29.08 204.96 0.14 No.1
Normal stress / shear interaction (MPa) -58.68 355.00 0.17 No.11
Shear in connection (kN/m) 90.72 405.02 0.22 No.1
NB : - The minimum reinforcement for Serviceability Limit States has been checked for the maximum bar diameter :
ϕ*s = 20 mm.
The reinforcement ratio is shown as "Limit" and must be greater than the strength value shown as "Value".
- Tensile stresses are positive; compressive stresses are negative.
ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE Value Limit Ratio Combination

Plastic shear resistance (kN) 54.13 286.95 0.19 No.1
Sagging, Plastic resistance (kN.m) 28.54 201.58 0.14 No.12
Hogging, Plastic resistance (kN.m) 13.76 124.40 0.11 No.3
Bending / shear interaction (sagging) (kN.m) - - - -
Bending / shear interaction (hogging) (kN.m) - - - -
Shear buckling: force criterion - - - -
Shear buckling: bending / shear interaction - - - -
LTBuckling 0.13 1.00 0.13 No.3

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 19 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 1

Section No. : 2
Node line No. : 3
Type of cross-section : Limit of support region
Position : 1.20 m Span No. : 1

Modular ratio - 6.67 19.94 20.19 6.67
Static moment (cm3) (2) 435.68 344.33 342.98 435.68 2449.31
Δσ EN 1994-2 7.4 (3) (MPa) (2) 45.52


Date : 28/09/2022 Page 20 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :

Type of cross-section : Limit of support region n: Modular ratio
PERMANENT LOADS

Self-weight - 16.83 -12.79 16.83 -9.91 -2.46
SDL1 19.94 3.59 -2.73 3.59 -2.10 -0.11
Increased SDL1 19.94 4.76 -3.61 4.75 -2.79 -0.14
Reduced SDL1 19.94 2.87 -2.18 2.87 -1.68 -0.09
SDL2 19.94 3.83 -2.90 3.81 -2.24 -0.11
Concrete shrinkage 20.19 13.89 0.44 13.92 0.07 -0.29
primary effect 14.86 14.86
secondary effect -0.98 0.44 -0.95 0.07
axial force - slab N = -284.40 kN N = -284.40 kN
Simpl. temp. load +DT°C 6.67 -8.10 -0.55 -8.11 -0.08 0.12
primary effect -9.27 -9.27
secondary effect 1.17 -0.55 1.16 -0.08
axial force - slab N = 430.31 kN N = 430.31 kN
Simpl. temp. load -DT°C 6.67 8.10 0.55 8.11 0.08 -0.12

Load on footbridge 17.94 0.00 -13.40 0.13 -10.44 0.31 -0.38

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 21 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 1

Section No. : 2
Node line No. : 3

Deflections (m) 0.004 0.027 0.14 Load case No.10
Minimum reinforcement (%) [R] 0.42 0.77 0.54 -
[L] 0.42 0.77 0.54 -
Slab cracking [R] No cracking No.17
[L] No cracking No.17
Compressive stress in top fibre of concrete (MPa) [R] -3.30 15.00 0.22 No.11
[L] -3.30 15.00 0.22 No.11
Tensile stress in reinforcement (top layer) (MPa) [R] 15.06 300.00 0.05 No.6
[L] 14.94 300.00 0.05 No.6
Stress in top fibre of steel section (MPa) [R] -126.67 355.00 0.36 No.16
[L] -126.68 355.00 0.36 No.16
Stress in bottom fibre of steel section (MPa) [R] 148.06 355.00 0.42 No.9
[L] 148.05 355.00 0.42 No.9
[L] -1.23 11.25 0.11 No.35
Shear stress in steel sections (MPa) [R] -18.16 204.96 0.09 No.1
[L] -23.60 204.96 0.12 No.1
Normal stress / shear interaction (MPa) [R] -141.19 355.00 0.40 No.9
[L] -143.55 355.00 0.40 No.9
Shear in connection (kN/m) [R] 54.20 405.02 0.13 No.1
[L] 70.68 405.02 0.17 No.1
ϕ*s = 20 mm.

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 22 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 1

Section No. : 2
Node line No. : 3

Plastic shear resistance (kN) [R] 34.26 286.95 0.12 No.1
[L] 44.15 286.95 0.15 No.1
Sagging, Plastic resistance (kN.m) [R] 72.42 209.83 0.35 No.7
[L] 72.42 209.83 0.35 No.7
Hogging, Plastic resistance (kN.m) [R] 0.00 0.00 - -
[L] 0.00 0.00 - -
Bending / shear interaction (sagging) (kN.m) [R] - - - -
[L] - - - -
Bending / shear interaction (hogging) (kN.m) [R] - - - -
[L] - - - -
Shear buckling: force criterion [R] - - - -
[L] - - - -
Shear buckling: bending / shear interaction [R] - - - -
[L] - - - -
LTBuckling [R] 0.00 0.00 - -
[L] 0.00 0.00 - -

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 23 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 1

Section No. : 3
Node line No. : 4
Type of cross-section : Diaphragm

Modular ratio - 6.67 19.94 20.19 6.67
Static moment (cm3) (2) 441.39 355.17 353.88 441.39 2641.29
Δσ EN 1994-2 7.4 (3) (MPa) (2) 42.49


Date : 28/09/2022 Page 24 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :

Type of cross-section : Diaphragm n: Modular ratio
PERMANENT LOADS

Self-weight - 24.76 -9.91 24.76 -6.87 -3.82
SDL1 19.94 5.27 -2.10 5.27 -1.47 -0.17
Increased SDL1 19.94 6.98 -2.79 6.98 -1.95 -0.22
Reduced SDL1 19.94 4.22 -1.68 4.22 -1.18 -0.13
SDL2 19.94 5.60 -2.24 5.60 -1.55 -0.18
Concrete shrinkage 20.19 13.86 0.07 13.86 -0.01 -0.42
secondary effect -1.01 0.07 -1.00 -0.01


Date : 28/09/2022 Page 25 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 1

Section No. : 3
Node line No. : 4

[L] 0.41 0.77 0.53 -
[L] -4.18 15.00 0.28 No.11
Tensile stress in reinforcement (top layer) (MPa) [R] - - - -
[L] - - - -
[L] -166.00 355.00 0.47 No.16
[L] 212.14 355.00 0.60 No.9
[L] -1.37 11.25 0.12 No.35
[L] -18.16 204.96 0.09 No.1
[L] -200.00 355.00 0.56 No.9
[L] 53.40 405.02 0.13 No.1
ϕ*s = 20 mm.

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 26 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 1

Section No. : 3
Node line No. : 4

[L] 34.26 286.95 0.12 No.1
[L] 99.39 213.99 0.46 No.7
[L] 0.00 0.00 - -
[L] - - - -
[L] - - - -
[L] - - - -
[L] - - - -
LTBuckling [R] 0.00 0.00 - -
[L] 0.00 0.00 - -

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 27 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 1

Section No. : 4
Node line No. : 7

Modular ratio - 6.67 19.94 20.19 6.67
Static moment (cm3) (2) 441.39 355.17 353.88 441.39 2641.29
Δσ EN 1994-2 7.4 (3) (MPa) (2) 42.49


Date : 28/09/2022 Page 28 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :

PERMANENT LOADS

Self-weight - 33.02 -1.38 33.02 1.38 -5.36
SDL1 19.94 7.03 -0.29 7.03 0.29 -0.23
Increased SDL1 19.94 9.32 -0.39 9.32 0.39 -0.31
Reduced SDL1 19.94 5.62 -0.23 5.62 0.23 -0.19
SDL2 19.94 7.46 -0.31 7.46 0.31 -0.25
Simpl. temp. load +DT°C 6.67 -8.06 0.00 -8.06 0.00 0.23
secondary effect 1.21 0.00 1.21 0.00


Date : 28/09/2022 Page 29 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 1

Section No. : 4
Node line No. : 7

[L] 0.41 0.77 0.53 -
[L] -5.38 15.00 0.36 No.11
[L] - - - -
[L] -207.62 355.00 0.58 No.16
[L] 281.14 355.00 0.79 No.9
[L] -1.66 11.25 0.15 No.35
[L] -4.58 204.96 0.02 No.11
[L] -262.07 355.00 0.74 No.9
[L] 16.86 405.02 0.04 No.11
ϕ*s = 20 mm.

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 30 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 1

Section No. : 4
Node line No. : 7

[L] 8.65 286.95 0.03 No.7
[L] 127.96 213.99 0.60 No.7
[L] 0.00 0.00 - -
[L] - - - -
[L] - - - -
[L] - - - -
[L] - - - -
LTBuckling [R] 0.00 0.00 - -
[L] 0.00 0.00 - -

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 31 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 1

Section No. : 5
Node line No. : 10

Modular ratio - 6.67 19.94 20.19 6.67
Static moment (cm3) (2) 441.39 355.17 353.88 441.39 2641.29
Δσ EN 1994-2 7.4 (3) (MPa) (2) 42.49


Date : 28/09/2022 Page 32 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :

PERMANENT LOADS

Self-weight - 24.76 6.87 24.76 9.91 -3.82
SDL1 19.94 5.27 1.47 5.27 2.10 -0.17
Increased SDL1 19.94 6.98 1.95 6.98 2.79 -0.22
Reduced SDL1 19.94 4.22 1.18 4.22 1.68 -0.13
SDL2 19.94 5.60 1.55 5.60 2.24 -0.18
Simpl. temp. load -DT°C 6.67 8.05 -0.02 8.05 -0.08 -0.17
secondary effect -1.22 -0.02 -1.22 -0.08


Date : 28/09/2022 Page 33 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 1

Section No. : 5
Node line No. : 10

[L] 0.41 0.77 0.53 -
[L] -4.18 15.00 0.28 No.11
[L] - - - -
[L] -166.00 355.00 0.47 No.16
[L] 212.14 355.00 0.60 No.9
[L] -1.37 11.25 0.12 No.35
[L] -13.32 204.96 0.06 No.9
[L] -198.81 355.00 0.56 No.9
[L] 40.36 405.02 0.10 No.9
ϕ*s = 20 mm.

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 34 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 1

Section No. : 5
Node line No. : 10

[L] 25.15 286.95 0.09 No.7
[L] 99.40 213.99 0.46 No.7
[L] 0.00 0.00 - -
[L] - - - -
[L] - - - -
[L] - - - -
[L] - - - -
LTBuckling [R] 0.00 0.00 - -
[L] 0.00 0.00 - -

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 35 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 1

Section No. : 6
Node line No. : 11

Modular ratio - 6.67 19.94 20.19 6.67
Static moment (cm3) (2) 435.68 344.33 342.98 435.68 2449.31
Δσ EN 1994-2 7.4 (3) (MPa) (2) 45.52


Date : 28/09/2022 Page 36 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :

PERMANENT LOADS

Self-weight - 16.83 9.91 16.83 12.79 -2.46
SDL1 19.94 3.59 2.10 3.59 2.73 -0.11
Increased SDL1 19.94 4.75 2.79 4.76 3.61 -0.14
Reduced SDL1 19.94 2.87 1.68 2.87 2.18 -0.09
SDL2 19.94 3.81 2.24 3.83 2.90 -0.11
Concrete shrinkage 20.19 13.92 -0.07 13.89 -0.44 -0.29


Date : 28/09/2022 Page 37 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 1

Section No. : 6
Node line No. : 11

[L] 0.42 0.77 0.54 -
[L] -3.30 15.00 0.22 No.11
[L] 15.06 300.00 0.05 No.6
[L] -126.67 355.00 0.36 No.16
[L] 148.06 355.00 0.42 No.9
[L] -1.24 11.25 0.11 No.35
[L] -18.16 204.96 0.09 No.1
[L] -141.19 355.00 0.40 No.9
[L] 54.20 405.02 0.13 No.1
ϕ*s = 20 mm.

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 38 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 1

Section No. : 6
Node line No. : 11

[L] 34.26 286.95 0.12 No.1
[L] 72.42 209.83 0.35 No.7
[L] 0.00 0.00 - -
[L] - - - -
[L] - - - -
[L] - - - -
[L] - - - -
LTBuckling [R] 0.00 0.00 - -
[L] 0.00 0.00 - -

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 39 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 1

Section No. : 7
Node line No. : 13
Position : 8.00 m End abutment

Modular ratio - 6.67 19.94 20.19 6.67
Static moment (cm3) (2) 424.81 324.69 323.27 424.81 2141.20
Δσ EN 1994-2 7.4 (3) (MPa) (2) 50.97


Date : 28/09/2022 Page 40 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :

PERMANENT LOADS

Self-weight - 0.00 15.26 0.00
SDL1 19.94 0.00 3.27 0.00
Increased SDL1 19.94 0.00 4.34 0.00
Reduced SDL1 19.94 0.00 2.62 0.00
SDL2 19.94 0.00 3.52 0.00
Concrete shrinkage 20.19 14.79 -0.97 0.00
secondary effect -0.07 -0.97
Simpl. temp. load +DT°C 6.67 -9.17 1.04 0.00
secondary effect 0.10 1.04
Simpl. temp. load -DT°C 6.67 9.17 -1.04 0.00
primary effect 9.27

Load on footbridge 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.97 0.00

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 41 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 1

Section No. : 7
Node line No. : 13

Deflections (m) 0.000 0.027 0.00 -
ϕ*s = 20 mm.


Date : 28/09/2022 Page 42 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 2

Section No. : 1
Node line No. : 1

Modular ratio - 6.67 19.94 20.19 6.67
Static moment (cm3) (2) 424.90 324.86 323.43 424.90 2143.57
Δσ EN 1994-2 7.4 (3) (MPa) (2) 50.92


Date : 28/09/2022 Page 43 / 78
Project reference :
Comment :

PERMANENT LOADS

Self-weight - 0.00 -15.28 0.00
SDL1 19.94 0.00 -3.28 0.00
Increased SDL1 19.94 0.00 -4.34 0.00
Reduced SDL1 19.94 0.00 -2.62 0.00
SDL2 19.94 0.00 -3.52 0.00
Concrete shrinkage 20.19 14.80 0.97 0.00
Simpl. temp. load +DT°C 6.67 -9.17 -1.04 0.00
secondary effect 0.10 -1.04
Simpl. temp. load -DT°C 6.67 9.17 1.04 0.00
primary effect 9.27

Load on footbridge 0.00 0.00 -16.99 0.00 0.00

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 44 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 2

Section No. : 1
Node line No. : 1

Deflections (m) 0.000 0.027 0.00 -
ϕ*s = 20 mm.


Date : 28/09/2022 Page 45 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 2

Section No. : 2
Node line No. : 3

Modular ratio - 6.67 19.94 20.19 6.67
Static moment (cm3) (2) 435.75 344.46 343.11 435.75 2451.49
Δσ EN 1994-2 7.4 (3) (MPa) (2) 45.49


Date : 28/09/2022 Page 46 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :

PERMANENT LOADS

Self-weight - 16.85 -12.80 16.85 -9.92 -2.47
SDL1 19.94 3.59 -2.73 3.59 -2.10 -0.11
Increased SDL1 19.94 4.76 -3.61 4.76 -2.79 -0.14
Reduced SDL1 19.94 2.87 -2.18 2.87 -1.68 -0.09
SDL2 19.94 3.83 -2.90 3.82 -2.24 -0.11


Date : 28/09/2022 Page 47 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 2

Section No. : 2
Node line No. : 3

[L] 0.42 0.77 0.54 -
[L] -3.30 15.00 0.22 No.11
[L] 14.91 300.00 0.05 No.6
[L] -126.76 355.00 0.36 No.16
[L] 148.15 355.00 0.42 No.9
[L] -1.23 11.25 0.11 No.35
[L] -23.61 204.96 0.12 No.1
[L] -143.65 355.00 0.40 No.9
[L] 70.72 414.89 0.17 No.1
ϕ*s = 20 mm.

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 48 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 2

Section No. : 2
Node line No. : 3

[L] 44.19 286.95 0.15 No.1
[L] 72.46 209.88 0.35 No.7
[L] 0.00 0.00 - -
[L] - - - -
[L] - - - -
[L] - - - -
[L] - - - -
LTBuckling [R] 0.00 0.00 - -
[L] 0.00 0.00 - -

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 49 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 2

Section No. : 3
Node line No. : 4

Modular ratio - 6.67 19.94 20.19 6.67
Static moment (cm3) (2) 441.45 355.29 353.99 441.45 2643.37
Δσ EN 1994-2 7.4 (3) (MPa) (2) 42.46


Date : 28/09/2022 Page 50 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :

PERMANENT LOADS

Self-weight - 24.79 -9.92 24.79 -6.88 -3.82
SDL1 19.94 5.27 -2.10 5.27 -1.47 -0.17
Increased SDL1 19.94 6.99 -2.79 6.99 -1.95 -0.22
Reduced SDL1 19.94 4.22 -1.68 4.22 -1.18 -0.13
SDL2 19.94 5.61 -2.24 5.61 -1.55 -0.18


Date : 28/09/2022 Page 51 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 2

Section No. : 3
Node line No. : 4

[L] 0.41 0.77 0.53 -
[L] -4.18 15.00 0.28 No.11
[L] - - - -
[L] -166.12 355.00 0.47 No.16
[L] 212.28 355.00 0.60 No.9
[L] -1.37 11.25 0.12 No.35
[L] -18.18 204.96 0.09 No.1
[L] -200.13 355.00 0.56 No.9
[L] 53.43 414.89 0.13 No.1
ϕ*s = 20 mm.

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 52 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 2

Section No. : 3
Node line No. : 4

[L] 34.29 286.95 0.12 No.1
[L] 99.46 214.03 0.46 No.7
[L] 0.00 0.00 - -
[L] - - - -
[L] - - - -
[L] - - - -
[L] - - - -
LTBuckling [R] 0.00 0.00 - -
[L] 0.00 0.00 - -

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 53 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 2

Section No. : 4
Node line No. : 7

Modular ratio - 6.67 19.94 20.19 6.67
Static moment (cm3) (2) 441.45 355.29 353.99 441.45 2643.37
Δσ EN 1994-2 7.4 (3) (MPa) (2) 42.46


Date : 28/09/2022 Page 54 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :

PERMANENT LOADS

Self-weight - 33.05 -1.38 33.05 1.38 -5.37
SDL1 19.94 7.04 -0.29 7.04 0.29 -0.23
Increased SDL1 19.94 9.32 -0.39 9.32 0.39 -0.31
Reduced SDL1 19.94 5.63 -0.23 5.63 0.23 -0.19
SDL2 19.94 7.47 -0.31 7.47 0.31 -0.25


Date : 28/09/2022 Page 55 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 2

Section No. : 4
Node line No. : 7

[L] 0.41 0.77 0.53 -
[L] -5.39 15.00 0.36 No.11
[L] - - - -
[L] -207.78 355.00 0.59 No.16
[L] 281.33 355.00 0.79 No.9
[L] -1.66 11.25 0.15 No.35
[L] -4.58 204.96 0.02 No.11
[L] -262.25 355.00 0.74 No.9
[L] 16.88 414.89 0.04 No.11
ϕ*s = 20 mm.

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 56 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 2

Section No. : 4
Node line No. : 7

[L] 8.66 286.95 0.03 No.7
[L] 128.04 214.03 0.60 No.7
[L] 0.00 0.00 - -
[L] - - - -
[L] - - - -
[L] - - - -
[L] - - - -
LTBuckling [R] 0.00 0.00 - -
[L] 0.00 0.00 - -

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 57 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 2

Section No. : 5
Node line No. : 10

Modular ratio - 6.67 19.94 20.19 6.67
Static moment (cm3) (2) 441.45 355.29 353.99 441.45 2643.37
Δσ EN 1994-2 7.4 (3) (MPa) (2) 42.46


Date : 28/09/2022 Page 58 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :

PERMANENT LOADS

Self-weight - 24.78 6.88 24.79 9.92 -3.82
SDL1 19.94 5.27 1.47 5.27 2.10 -0.17
Increased SDL1 19.94 6.99 1.95 6.99 2.79 -0.22
Reduced SDL1 19.94 4.22 1.18 4.22 1.68 -0.13
SDL2 19.94 5.61 1.55 5.61 2.24 -0.18


Date : 28/09/2022 Page 59 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 2

Section No. : 5
Node line No. : 10

[L] 0.41 0.77 0.53 -
[L] -4.18 15.00 0.28 No.11
[L] - - - -
[L] -166.12 355.00 0.47 No.16
[L] 212.28 355.00 0.60 No.9
[L] -1.37 11.25 0.12 No.35
[L] -13.33 204.96 0.07 No.9
[L] -198.95 355.00 0.56 No.9
[L] 40.39 414.89 0.10 No.9
ϕ*s = 20 mm.

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 60 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 2

Section No. : 5
Node line No. : 10

[L] 25.18 286.95 0.09 No.7
[L] 99.46 214.03 0.46 No.7
[L] 0.00 0.00 - -
[L] - - - -
[L] - - - -
[L] - - - -
[L] - - - -
LTBuckling [R] 0.00 0.00 - -
[L] 0.00 0.00 - -

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 61 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 2

Section No. : 6
Node line No. : 11

Modular ratio - 6.67 19.94 20.19 6.67
Static moment (cm3) (2) 435.75 344.46 343.11 435.75 2451.49
Δσ EN 1994-2 7.4 (3) (MPa) (2) 45.49


Date : 28/09/2022 Page 62 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :

PERMANENT LOADS

Self-weight - 16.85 9.92 16.85 12.80 -2.47
SDL1 19.94 3.59 2.10 3.59 2.73 -0.11
Increased SDL1 19.94 4.76 2.79 4.76 3.61 -0.14
Reduced SDL1 19.94 2.87 1.68 2.87 2.18 -0.09
SDL2 19.94 3.82 2.24 3.83 2.90 -0.11
Concrete shrinkage 20.19 13.92 -0.07 13.89 -0.44 -0.29


Date : 28/09/2022 Page 63 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 2

Section No. : 6
Node line No. : 11

[L] 0.42 0.77 0.54 -
[L] -3.30 15.00 0.22 No.11
[L] 15.04 300.00 0.05 No.6
[L] -126.75 355.00 0.36 No.16
[L] 148.16 355.00 0.42 No.9
[L] -1.24 11.25 0.11 No.35
[L] -18.18 204.96 0.09 No.1
[L] -141.28 355.00 0.40 No.9
[L] 54.23 414.89 0.13 No.1
ϕ*s = 20 mm.

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 64 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 2

Section No. : 6
Node line No. : 11

[L] 34.29 286.95 0.12 No.1
[L] 72.47 209.88 0.35 No.7
[L] 0.00 0.00 - -
[L] - - - -
[L] - - - -
[L] - - - -
[L] - - - -
LTBuckling [R] 0.00 0.00 - -
[L] 0.00 0.00 - -

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 65 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 2

Section No. : 7
Node line No. : 13

Modular ratio - 6.67 19.94 20.19 6.67
Static moment (cm3) (2) 424.90 324.86 323.43 424.90 2143.57
Δσ EN 1994-2 7.4 (3) (MPa) (2) 50.92


Date : 28/09/2022 Page 66 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :

PERMANENT LOADS

Self-weight - 0.00 15.28 0.00
SDL1 19.94 0.00 3.28 0.00
Increased SDL1 19.94 0.00 4.34 0.00
Reduced SDL1 19.94 0.00 2.62 0.00
SDL2 19.94 0.00 3.52 0.00
Concrete shrinkage 20.19 14.80 -0.97 0.00
Simpl. temp. load +DT°C 6.67 -9.17 1.04 0.00
secondary effect 0.10 1.04
Simpl. temp. load -DT°C 6.67 9.17 -1.04 0.00
primary effect 9.27

Load on footbridge 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.99 0.00

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 67 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Beam line No. : 2

Section No. : 7
Node line No. : 13

Deflections (m) 0.000 0.027 0.00 -
ϕ*s = 20 mm.


Date : 28/09/2022 Page 68 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
REACTIONS AT SUPPORTS UNDER PERMANENT LOADING
All reaction forces are displayed in kN
Loading : Self-weight - ΣFZ = 66.03 kN
C0 C1
Line 1 16.50 16.50
Line 2 16.51 16.51
Σ 33.01 33.01
Loading : SDL1 - ΣFZ = 15.07 kN
C0 C1
Line 1 3.76 3.77
Line 2 3.77 3.77
Σ 7.53 7.53
Loading : Increased SDL1 - ΣFZ = 19.97 kN
C0 C1
Line 1 4.99 4.99
Line 2 4.99 4.99
Σ 9.98 9.98
Loading : Reduced SDL1 - ΣFZ = 12.05 kN
C0 C1
Line 1 3.01 3.01
Line 2 3.02 3.02
Σ 6.03 6.03
Loading : SDL2 - ΣFZ = 16.00 kN
C0 C1
Line 1 4.00 4.00
Line 2 4.00 4.00
Σ 8.00 8.00
Loading : Concrete shrinkage - ΣFZ = 0.00 kN
C0 C1
Line 1 0.00 0.00
Line 2 0.00 0.00
Σ 0.00 0.00

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 69 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Reactions at supports (continued)
Loading : Simpl. temp. load +DT°C - ΣFZ = 0.00 kN
C0 C1
Line 1 0.00 0.00
Line 2 0.00 0.00
Σ 0.00 0.00
Loading : Simpl. temp. load -DT°C - ΣFZ = 0.00 kN
C0 C1
Line 1 0.00 0.00
Line 2 0.00 0.00
Σ 0.00 0.00

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 70 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
ENVELOPES OF THE REACTIONS AT SUPPORTS UNDER LIVE LOADING
Loading : Load on footbridge - Maximum reaction forces
C0 C1
Line 1 20.00 20.00
Line 2 20.00 20.00
Loading : Load on footbridge - Minimum reaction forces
C0 C1
Line 1 0.13 0.13
Line 2 0.13 0.13

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 71 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
ENVELOPES OF THE REACTIONS AT SUPPORTS UNDER SLS COMBINATIONS
Maximum reaction forces
C0 C1
Line 1 45.48 45.47
Line 2 45.52 45.52
Minimum reaction forces
C0 C1
Line 1 23.56 23.56
Line 2 23.58 23.58

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 72 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
NATURAL FREQUENCY
Natural frequency of principal bending mode (Rayleigh method) : f = 5.61 Hz

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 73 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
Transverse bending of the slab
Following tables give the min|max values for the transverse bending moment in the slab.
Results are given in kN.m/m
Permanent loads :
Span GS GS+ GS- GL

no 1 -0.40 | 0.00 -0.53 | 0.01 -0.32 | 0.00 0.00 | 0.11
Span SH TH+ TH-

no 1 -0.38 | 0.45 -0.41 | 0.41 -0.41 | 0.41
Live loads :
Span CPAS
no 1 -3.11 | 0.11
Combinations :
Span SLS ULS

no 1 -4.27 | 0.92 -5.30 | 1.15

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 74 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Criterion : Stress in bottom fibre of steel section (Serviceability Limit State)
Max. ratio = 0.79 < 1.00 SATISFACTORY
Combination No.9
Beam line No.2 - Cross-section No.7 : Position = 4.00 m
Checking minimum reinforcement criterion
Reference : EN 1994-2:2005 7.4.2

Slab reinforcement ratio : 0.77 %
The criterion is satisfied for all design cross-sections, for 20 mm diameter bars.
Slab cracking ;
Maximum bar diameter (EN1994-2:2005 Table 7.1; wk = 0,2 mm) Φmax = 22.11 mm
Maximum bar spacing (EN1994-2:2005 Table 7.2; wk = 0,2 mm) smax = 200.00 mm
For upper layer of reinforcement : Φ = 12.00 mm

s = 200.00 mm
Caution: reinforcement must meet at least one of these two conditions.

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 75 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
CONTENTS
DATA 2
List of load cases 6
List of ULS combinations 7
List of SLS combinations 8
ESTIMATED QUANTITIES 12
NUMBER OF CONNECTORS 14
LIST OF CROSS-SECTIONS OF INTEREST 15
Slab cracking 16
Beam line No. 1 - Section No. 1 17
REACTIONS AT SUPPORTS UNDER PERMANENT LOADING 69
ENVELOPES OF THE REACTIONS AT SUPPORTS UNDER LIVE 71

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 77 / 78
:
Project reference :
Comment :
ENVELOPES OF THE REACTIONS AT SUPPORTS UNDER SLS C 72
Natural frequency 73
SUMMARY OF RESULTS 75
CONTENTS 77

Date : 28/09/2022 Page 78 / 78
:
FINITE ELEMENT MODEL STUDY : 8M
Supports Finite Element Model
Main beams
Diaphragms
Changes in cross-section
Diaphragms and
Changes in cross-section
Concrete slab
Special cross-sections
12
x y
67
3
11
12
8
16
17 45
13
21
22 9
10 C0
18 14
26 15
27
23
31
32 19
20
28
36
37 24
25
33
41
42 29
30
38
46
47 34
35
43
39
40
51
52 48
56
57 44
45
53 49
61
62 50
58
54
55
63
Line 1 59
60
64
65
C1
Line 2
Shear force envelopes STUDY : 8M
Load on footbridge Envelopes for Load on footbridge
Units : kN
16.99 / 12.14
12.14 / 7.28
7.28 / 2.43
2.43 / -2.43
-2.43 / -7.28
-7.28 / -12.14
-12.14 / -16.99
x y
C0
Line 1
C1
Line 2
Bending moment envelopes STUDY : 8M
Load on footbridge Envelopes for Load on footbridge
Units : kN.m
0.00 / 4.96
4.96 / 9.92
9.92 / 14.88
14.88 / 19.84
19.84 / 24.80
24.80 / 29.76
29.76 / 34.72
x y
C0
Line 1
C1
Line 2

Footbridge Calculation

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Footbridge Calculation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DESIGN NOTE

Company : Absolute Barrkee Industries

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SOFTWARE

Method of analysis and design checks

CTICM, Centre Technique Industriel de la Construction Métallique, France.

Software use conditions apply

FOOTBRIDGE - Conventional beam and slab superstructure

1 span Span length = 8.000 m

2 beam lines (Distance to left-hand edge of deck slab)

Precast concrete panel : Thickness of precast concrete panel = 0.3 cm

Propping : No propping of main beams during deck slab concreting.

Layer Top Bottom

Shear studs : Ø16x100 (PRd= 52.7 kN)

Structural steel S355 (WITH reduction of yield strength with thickness)

Concrete Class C25/30

Material properties used in calculations

Yield strength of the steel of girders fy = 355.0 MPa

Modulus of elasticity Ecm = 31476 MPa

Software use conditions apply

span 1 Left-hand edge beam IPE 200

Support lines LH side (m) RH side (m)

Parapets left-hand side x = 0.00 m q = 1.00 kN/m

Live loads for the footbridge

Calculation according to EN 1991-2:2003 5.3.2.1

Vehicles moving on footbridge

Vehicle on bridge not taken into account in calculation.

Support height ajustments and settlements

Height adjustments Settlements 1 Settlements 2

Support line No. 0 0 mm 0 mm 0 mm

Support line No. 1 0 mm 0 mm 0 mm

Software use conditions apply

Assumptions for calculation and checks

Diaphragms Coefficient for inertia = 0.10

Slab elements Coefficient for inertia - longitudinal = 1.00

Serviceability Limit States

Deflection due to live loads limited to 1/ 300 of span length

Partial safety factor for the structural steel γM,ser = 1.00

Ultimate Limit States

Partial safety factors :

IPE 200 Line 2

Software use conditions apply

Weighting factors for SDL1 :

Partial factors for loads - Combination factors :

Partial factors for loads (ULS) :

Permanent loads γG = 1.35

IPE 200 IPE 200

Software use conditions apply

LIST OF LOAD CASES

No. Symbol Name of load case Modular ratio

3 GS+ Increased SDL1 19.94

4 GS- Reduced SDL1 19.94

6 SH Concrete shrinkage 20.19

7 TH+ Simpl. temp. load +DT°C 6.67

8 TH- Simpl. temp. load -DT°C 6.67

10 CPAS Load on footbridge 6.67

Software use conditions apply

LIST OF ULS COMBINATIONS

Software use conditions apply

LIST OF SLS COMBINATIONS

Characteristics SLS combinations

Software use conditions apply

Frequent SLS combinations

Software use conditions apply