You are on page 1of 8

Btti/d. A',+i Vol. 9, pp. 9-16. Pergamon Press 1974. Printed in Great Britain.

I___ I (27) [~J) i

Experimental Study on the Effect of Roof


Spray Cooling on Unconditioned and
Conditioned Buildings
S. P. J A I N *
K. R. RAO+

This paper present,+ the result of experimental investigations otl the ~}[:/ect o[
roof pond, roof spray and wetted gunny bag O'sterns on the temperature and
heat flow at the ceiling surface of thick R.C.C. roofs of air conditioned and
unconditioned rooms exposed to a hot-dry climate. Re.+'ults show that an
appreciable reduction of the order of 13,15 and 17°C. re,+pectivelv has been
observed in the ceiling temperature by these three cooling .s'ystems. Peak heat
flow is reduced b3' 85 per cent in the case,++of roof-spray and ro~?fpond svstem,~.
Furthermore the heat flow get,++reversed i.e. it flows out of the room in [he case
of wetted gunny bags. An integrated system of roof spray and air-conditioning
brings about a reduction of the order of 60--65 per cent in the peak heat.flow,
resulting into a saving of 40 per cent in the electrical consumption.

INTRODUCTION The object of experiments covered by this paper


was to determine (1) quantitatively the extent to
IN T H E T R O P I C S considerable heat flows into
which intermittent spraying and other cooling
buildings[7]. The ceiling o f the r o o m attains high
system like water pond and evaporative cooling can
temperatures of the order o f 40-45°C.
cool thick and heavy R.C.C. roofs under the
Different roof treatments such as increasing the
unconditioned state, and (2) the reduction in the air
r o o f thickness, inserting additional insulation.
conditioning load and running costs in the case o f
providing false ceilings, shading the roof, surface
an integrated system of r o o f spray and air con-
treatment with reflective paints[5] and r o o f spray or
ditioning.
pooled water, are possible means o f reducing tem-
perature and heat flow. Treatments for reducing the
transfer o f heat from the r o o f to the ceiling are not TEST FACILITIES AND MEASURING
as efficient as other types of treatments used to
TECHNIQUES
reduce the effective incidence of heat on the roof.
One of such means used at the University of Texas. To study the effect of r o o f spray and other
has been placing o f permanent pools of water on cooling systems four identical full sized (3.5 ×
the roofs, but this method has its own limitations 2-9 × 3.2 m) test rooms having similar design and
including structural difficulties. The use o f r o o f following specifications were selected :
sprays to reduce the temperature and thus minimise
R o o f s - - 1 5 cm R.C.C. with 1-27 cm cement
the inward heat flow o f absorbed solar radiation
plaster both sides.
was first investigated at the A S H R A E laboratory at
W a l l s - - 2 3 cm solid brick wall with 1.27 cm
Pittsburg in 193911] and then at Phoenix in 196514].
cement plaster both sides.
The usefulness of spray cooling was well established
in the case of thin, lightly constructed and poorly These test rooms are located in an open site to
insulated roof[2, 3]. For such applications, the cost ensure unobstructed exposure conditions and they
o f conventional air-conditioning would be prohibi- are spaced so that no mutual shading occurs at any
tive, but r o o f sprays can improve substantially the time. Also in order to eliminate the effect of
coml~)rt o f the occupant. ventilation tests were carried out with doors and
windows of the test rooms shut.
* Central building research institute, Roorkee. The difference in thermal equivalence due to non-
+ Presently working as an Assoc. Prof., Dept. of Building uniformity of construction is minor and it was con-
Science, Faculty of Architecture, University of Singapore, firmed by taking a series of tests on test-rooms
10 ,5~. P. Ja#~ and K. R. Rao

without any treatment. Various types of cooling cycle arrangement comprised :~ -;>t~v:itr~l:l,.)u~ ~ltot~e
system for roofs were tried out in three of the test driven clock having one re~.oii.~lJc~ ~n <~nc ~;~'~
rooms, while the fourth one with an untreated roof The p u m p controlled b~ thc ~,,<~ ,~)'clc ~ m m g c
served as the standard r o o m for comparison. lnefll a n d ~t solenoid valve w,. ~,,,.:(i ~ ,,:o~k li:c
The test conditions and as well as the duration of W~ller s p r a y
various tests are listed in Table 1. A layer of tarfelt tilt) H/ettcd gunn.! bags. l.n~pt 5 cement i~ags
was laid on the r o o f top o f each o f the four rooms. were spread on the r o o f top o[ ; t,,:st room ~e~- tilt:
Air conditioners were installed in the standard and tarfelt and water was sprinkled ~hree times ;~ da 5,
spray cooled test rooms at the southern walls ;~t 50 litres each time to keep il '~,~':i .round [he clock
1-2 m above floor, so as to enable comparison wilh
and without r o o f spray under the conditioned
state when desired. The thermostat used tk)r regula- DISCUSSION OF TEST RESUL['S
ting r o o m air temperature within _+ 1 "F were placed
at the centre o f each r o o m 1.2 m above the f l o o r Thermal equivalence Of test room,
Time totalisers were also connected to the com- The first series of tests withou~ any treatment was
pressors o f the air conditioners for noting the effec- confined to a comparison of the thermal conditions
tive hours of running. Separate electric k W H in all the test rooms with respec~ ~o indoor air and
meters were also connected in each room. Water inner surface temperature.-, ~,1 ihe ceiling. Thc

Tabh, I 7e~'t conditions a m / d u r a t h m o~ lest.s

1 I1 111 IV
Test room 6 and 7th May 9 and 10th Ma? 19 and 20th May ~ ~d 4th Jura:
number 1972 1972 1972 ! 9"7?

I (std) No treatment No treatment Air conditioned a i r conditioned and table fan


"'on" dtlring day and night.

No treatment Roof pond with 7-5-cm-


thick water layer day and
night.

3 No treatment Roof spray (intermittent) Air conditioned and roof Air conditioned and roof spra?
for 1], rain. after every 7~ spray day and night, on wetted gunny bags and
rain. during day only. table tim "on" during da~
and night

4 No treatment Gunny bags wetted three


times during day.

meters were installed for measuring the quantity deviations of m a x i m u m and minimum indoor ai~
o f water used in spray. temperatures and maximum and m i n i m u m inner
Temperatures were measured by 3 0 S . W . G . surface temperatures o f ceiling from the tempera-
calibrated copper constantan thermocouples con- ture conditions in the standard house are listed in
nected t h r o u g h a junction box and lead wires to a Tables 2 and 3. Only selected days are considered
precision self balancing indicating potentiometer. on which clear weather remained throughout the
The temperatures are correct to 0.25°F. Heat-flow day.
rates were measured by sensitive and individually It can be observed f r o m Tables 2 and 3 that the
calibrated heat flow meters consisting of several test r o o m s can be considered as thermally equiva-
differential thermal junctions. Curves showing the lent since the deviations in the air and ceiling surface
variation o f temperatures and heat flows have been temperatures are well within the accuracy of the
numbered as per test conditions and numbers o f the measurements. However these minor deviations
test r o o m s given in Table 1. can be attributed to non uniformity o f construction.

Various types o f cooling systems E[/ect o] stratification


(i) R o o f pond. Water is filled on the r o o f of a test In the case o f conditioned test r o o m s with and
r o o m up to a level o f 7.5 cm. without fan circulation, existence o f stratified air
(it) R o o f spray. An automatic intermittent r o o f layers indoors has been observed. Temperatures
spray system with a booster p u m p and time cycle were measured at four different levels 2.5 cm,
arrangement which sprayed for 2¼ min. at intervals 0.76 m, 1.8 m and 2.4 m below ceiling respectively,
of 27¼ min has been designed and set up. The time W i t h o u t fan circulation a temperature gradient of"
Kxperimental Study or7 t h e E(['ect ~?f R o o f Spra.t' C o o l i n g o n U n c o n d i t i o t u ' d a n d C o n d i f i t m e d BuilcfiHgs II

Table 2 Deriations o f m a x i m u m attd minimunl indoor air temperatures in test roam.~


]i+om the t'alnes obtained in standard lest room No. I

Air temperature Deviation of air temperatures from those of standard


1.2m above floor test room No. I ( C )
Date of ( CI
test
Test room No. I Test room No. 2 Test r o o m No. 3 Test room No. 4
(Std.)

Max. Min. Max. Min. Max+ Min. Max. Min.

6.5.72 33.9 28-6 0"0 -0.7 -0.3 +0"3 -0"5 - 0"3

7.5.72 34.0 30.0 . 0.2 0"0 0.1 +0-4 -0+1 0"0

Mean 34.0 29.3 -0-1 -0.35 -0-2 +0.35 0.3 -0.15

l}~ble 3 Deriation o f m a x i m u m and minhmmt imter sutJace temperatures q f ceilin,gs i Jr


test rooms f r o m the rah~es obtained bt standard test room No. 1

Ceiling temper- Deviation of ceiling temperature from that in standard


Date of ature (~ C) test r o o m No. 1
test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Test r o o m No. I Test room No. 2 Test room No. 3 Test r o o m No. 4
(std.)

Max. Min. Max. Min. Max. Min. Max. Min.

6.5.72 43.3 27-2 +0.9 + 1-4 +0-6 +0.3 +0.3 -0.3


7+5.72 42.8 29.4 +0.8 -0.2 +0.5 ~ 0.6 +0-5 +0-6

Mean 43-05 28.3 +0.85 -0.8 +0.55 +0.45 +0.4 +0.15

Table 4 R o o f ceiling maxima-minhna temperatures and heat flow under strattl/ied and unstratified contritions

M a x i m u m tern- Reduction in maxi- Total heat flow Reduction in total


Test Date of Shade air perature for un- ma temps, for at ceiling surface heat flow. per day
condition test temperature treated roof sprayed roof per day (untreated) <spray-cooled)
roc, f )

maxima minima roof ceiling roof ceiling (Kcal/mZ/day) Kcal m 2 da~

Without 19~5 72 42"2 24.2 56.9 42.5 26.1 13.6 420 366
fan .............. . . . . . . . . . . . i+Mean-+420
tstratified) 205,72 42-2 20.8 58-3 43.3 26.9 13.6 517 474

With 3 6:72 40.8 28.9 51.7 34.7 20.3 6.8 449 285
fan ,- M ean-+ 263
lunstratified) 4 6'72 38.1 26.1 51.1 33-6 19.7 5-0 437 241 1

the order of 10C was recorded by the two thermo- reduction in maxima temperatures of roof and
couples one at 2.5 cm and the other at 2.5 m below' ceiling and the integrated h e a t f l o w at t h e c e i l i n g
ceiling. With fan circulation however, the tempera- surface per day whereas under the stratified con-
ture gradient vanishes t o n e a r l y 2+'C o n l y . D u e t o dition of the inside air so much reduction is n o t
the unstratified condition there is a c o n s i d e r a b l e o b s e r v e d a s s h o w n in T a b l e 4.
12 ,S'.P..lain and hZ R, Ra:'

FACTORS EFFECTING THERMAL untreated r o o f . T i l e r e d u c t i o ~ ~; h+ghes~ i, '",


CONDITIONS INDOORS wetted gunny bag treatment, t IH.-- ;~ ,.Jtlc i~> ii~,~:.-~
effective evaporation al t h e ~ , , :,~facc

(a) Outside roof surface temperature,~


The hourly variation of the outside roof surface (b) Inside ceiling surface' temper,.'~u,,'c,.
temperatures of all the test rooms with various roof ] h e diurnal variation of" lhc cethng temperature
treatments under the unconditioned state is shown of the test rooms under the unconditioned state a Fe
in figure t. On comparing the roof maximum tem- shown in figure 2, A drop of the ,.,Mer ol" 13, i~ and
peratures the order of reduction for the roof pond. 17 C has been observed for ~i~ rod( pond, roof
roof spray and wetted gunny bag treatments was spray and wetted gunny bag treatments respecti~ el/,
23, 25 and 27°C respectively as compared to the as compared to the ceiling of untreated lesl r o o m

60

ii
?
. . . . / \ / \
35 - / X / \

3o \ 2

25

2O

0 4 8 12 16 20 0 4 8 [2 t6 20
I_ 9-5-72 Time,_ t _ hr 10-5-72
J- -I -

Fi,e, 1.

6C

5~

5O

45

t)
40

~j
55

2
5O
E

2O

1 i I , ] ' ~ ~,_ ; i
Time, hr
9-5-72 ~ 10-5-72 --
i. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i

F&-, ~
E.werimental S t u d r on tlw Effbct Of" R o o f S p r a y Cooling on Unconditioned and Conditioned Buildim,,s' 13

(c) b u t o o r air temperature,~ test rooms with and without gunny bags roof treat-
Figure 3 shows the indoor air temperature varia- ment under the unconditioned state is shown in
tions at 1.2 m above floor level in the four test figure 4. The globe temperatures in the untreated
rooms. A drop of the order o f 3, 3.5 and 4~C test room are higher during day time as they include
respectively for the roof pond, r o o f spray and the effect of radiant heat gain from the hot ceiling.
wetted gunny bag treatments was measured. The difference in m a x i m u m globe temperatures
between the untreated and treated test units (roof
(d) Globe t e m p e r a t u r e s pond. roof spray, wetted gunny bags) is of the order
A comparison of the globe temperature of two of 5~C which is quite an appreciable figure.

45

~5 I
/

3
x.-×

2~ i i i i 1 i J [ i
:o3 4 8 12 le 2o 0 4 8 12 16 2o .,
Time, hr
9-5- 72 i 10-5-72

Fi~,. 3.

55

50

.15

,D 4 0
o

- 35
e~ J

e~

E 25
J:
20

__ I t I ; , i : I i i i
4 8 r2 16 2Q 0 4 8 12 16 20
9-5-72 Time, hr
. . . . . . . . ~ 10-5-72 --i

F&,. 4.
14 S. P. Jam and ~. R. Ra,~

(e) Heat flow through the ceiling {t) Intqwaled heat flow throuxt7 ~u~in:,:
For a better compttrisori o1" he{; llo\t ~ilt'{ ::tl]~_]
Besides lowering ceiling temperatures and the wllhoul r o o f treatments p,[et.,r:~led he,q: i!o~,.
corresponding indoor air temperatures in a room. through the ceilings have h c ~ compuied a n d
the important function of different roof treatments presented as bar charts in ligurc <- i~ i; noticed thal
is to reduce the heat flow into the room through the with these treatments, a tremelM,,tts reduc~i,m ~n
roof. This effect is illustrated in figure 5 for the total heat ltow, as much as 240 2(¢~ kcal m l)cr da~
unconditioned test rooms with and without can take place. ]'he maxhnun~ red[l,.;tion is obser'.ed
different roof treatments which is self explanatory for the wetted gunny bag lreatmcnt This brings ou~:
However, it should be appreciated that a large the efficiency of wetted gunn} ~ag Irea{mem !br
reduction of the order of 85 per cent in peak heat thick R.CC. r o o g in hot cJima~t
gains can be achieved by roof spray and roof pond In the case of condilioned te-; rooms with atW,
whereas heat flow gets reversed in the case o f without roof spra> the reducti,,m m ~he toia] heat
wetted gunny bags. flow ~s of the order of 420 kcaii m e per hr whe,a
In the case of unconditioned test rooms with stratilied ap conditions ~c~l.,'; lnd ~x nearl5
and without roof spray the peak heat gain is reduced 2 6 3 k c a l : m : per day when the 'ira~ified ~ir la,.er

5IV
to nearly 65 per cent. ~s disturbed by operating a f',i:~ .:,side

~.~(

I
~E 20

o~ o

4-
0 I0

20

I i i i ;
50 i 4 8 12 I~ 20 0 4 8 F~ # :'o
9-5 72 Time, r'i 10-5- 72
i. . . . . . . . i-
[ S r . 5,

] Untreated 24
50C
24 24

400

30C
20
~ WettedGunneybags

20
H H
~>" 20C

"E
"~ IOC

o .... . . . . . . . . . . . . .

O0 3
o
Igl
4---1oo

I
-200
~ v~24 ~ 24
Unconditioned Conditioned
-500

Fig. 6.
E.vperimental Study on the Effect o f R o o f Spray Cooling on Unconditioned and Conditioned Buildin~x 15

Table 5 Degree hours ~r ceiling temperatures

Total discomfort Duration Peak temp. hour Average discomfort


Test room Conditions (Degree hours) > 30 C (Degree hourst
No -- --
(hr.) ( Ct

I Untreated 153 19 15 1700 8


2 7.5 cm water pond roof on top da.v 4 4 1.4 1600 I
and night
3 Roof spray day time only 2 3 I 1500 0.7
4 Gunny-bags w'etted during day only Nil Nil 2.2 1500 nil
(peak temp. is throughout
less than 30 C)

Degree hour rating j o t ceiling surface reduces the discomfort indoors: however, the
The total discomfort degree hours above a base wetted g u n n y bag system provides the best com-
temperature of 3 0 C , the d u r a t i o n for which such fortable conditions indoors. It appears that this
temperatures exist, the average of these degrees type of evaporative cooling system will be still
per hour and also the peak degree hour, for the more effective if some other convenient type of
three various treatments along with the untreated material is f o u n d to hold more water than the
one under the u n c o n d i t i o n e d state were compared g u n n y bags.
as presented in Table 5. A huge reduction of ceiling
degree hours takes place by the various treatments. For conditioned buildings
Moreover for the wetted g u n n y bags, the peak An integrated system of roof spray and air
temperature has been always less than 3ffC c o n d i t i o n i n g would result in considerable reduction
t h r o u g h o u t the diurnal cycle. in the cooling load and the consequent c o n s u m p t i o n
of electrical energy.

CONCLUSION Acknowledgement The authors would like to record their


appreciation for the assistance received from Shri Kaloo
k))r unconditioned buildings Ram, J.L.A., in the experimental and data compilation work.
The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. N. K. D.
In tropics the c o n v e n t i o n a l R.C.C. roof needs Choudhury, Scientist Coordinator efficiency of buildings,
some treatment to reduce the ceiling a n d i n d o o r air for the keen interest shown in this project.
temperatures particularly in s u m m e r season. This paper is based on the work done as a part of the
research programme of the Central Building Research
In general all the roof treatments studied, roof Institute, Roorkee and is submitted with the approval of
pond, roof spray and wetted g u n n y bags, effectively the Director.

REFERENCES

I. E. C. HOUGHTEN,C. GUTBERLETand H. T. OLSON, Summer cooling load as affected by


heat gain through dry, sprinkled and water covered roofs. A.S.H.V.E. Trans. 46, 231
(1940).
2. W. R. WOOLRtCH and W. W. RWE, Solar radiation absorption by wetted roofs. Heatinff
and Ventilating, 84 (1948).
3. C. E. SUTVON, Roof spray for reduction in transmitted solar radiation. Heating, Piping,
and A it Conditioning, 131 (1950).
4. 1. JOHN, Yellott roof cooling with intermittent water sprays. A S H R A E 73rd Annual
Meeting in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, June 27-29 (1966).
5. S. P. JAIN, White washing roof top of residential buildings. Ind. Architect, (19671.
6. K. R. RAO, S. P. JA1N and K. N. AGARWAL,Degree hour rating of thermal performance of
Enclosures. Paper presented at the Symposium on Environmental Physics as Applied to
Buildings in the Tropics, Feb. 25 27, 1969 at the Central Building Research Institute,
Roorkee, India (1969).
7. S. P. JAIN, Thermal performance of perforated brick, hollow and light-weight block con-
struction in tropics. Arch. Sci. Rec. 12, ([) (1969).
16 <V. P../ain asul ~, R Ra,~

Ce texte pr6sente le rdsultat d'etudes expdrimentales ~ur l'efl'et de -,ystdi:le, d,:


refroidissement par bassins, par vaporisation et par sacs de jute mouillds..,ur I~
temp&ature et l'6coulement de chaleur i/ chaleur ~t la surface du p!afond <i~ ~ ,
6pais R.C.C. de pidces gt air conditionn6 et non-conditionn6 exposdes ~'t i~ climber
chaud-froid, kes r6sultats montrent qu'une reduction apprdciable de la ~emp(:,'atu~o
du plafond de I'ordre de 13, 15 et 17C a ,Sid observde par ces troi> sy'<,}v~>> ;!c
refroidissement, ka pointe d'6coulement de chaleur est rdduite de 85 pour c < ! ! ~!a.qs
les cas des syst6mes it vaporisation et ii bassin. [)e plus. t'ecoulement de chaieur c..,~
invers& c'est-it-dire qu'il va de la piece vers I'extdrieur dans le cas du -,ystdm~< i~ ~;c~,
en jute mouillds. Un syst6me intdgrd de vaporisation de toit et d'air cond;iioimC
apporte une rdduction de l'ordre de 60-65 pour cent dans la pointe de 1"6cot~temem
de chaleur, rdsultant en une 6conomie de 40 pour cei~l dans la c:~ns<~p,,;~!i,m
d'dlectricit&

Dieser Bericht bringt die Ergebnisse experimenteller Untersuchungen 0bc~ die


Wirkung yon Dachteich-, Dachspritzwasserund feuchten Jutesacksystemen auf die
Temperatur und den W/irmefluB an der Deckenfl~iche dicker Stahlbetond/icher yon
klimatisierten und nicht klimatisierten R/iumen, welche einem HeiBen-Trockenklima
ausgesetzt sind. Ergebnisse zeigen, dab eine bedeutende Abnahme im Bereich ~on
13, 15 beziehungsweise 17°C in der Deckentemperatur dieser drei Kfihlsysteme
beobachtet wurde. W/irmespitzenfluB wird in den F/J.llen yon Dachspritzwasser und
Dachteichsystemen um 85 Prozent reduziert. AuBerdem dreht sich der W/irmefluB
urn, d.h. die W/irme flieBt im Falle yon feuchten Jutes~icken aus dem Raum heraus.
Ein eingebautes System von Dachspritzung und Klimaanlage verursacht eine Reduk-
tion in dem W/irmespitzenflu8 in H6he von 60 65 Prozent, was eine Ersparnis yon
40 Prozent an elektrischem Strom ergibl.

You might also like