Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This paper present,+ the result of experimental investigations otl the ~}[:/ect o[
roof pond, roof spray and wetted gunny bag O'sterns on the temperature and
heat flow at the ceiling surface of thick R.C.C. roofs of air conditioned and
unconditioned rooms exposed to a hot-dry climate. Re.+'ults show that an
appreciable reduction of the order of 13,15 and 17°C. re,+pectivelv has been
observed in the ceiling temperature by these three cooling .s'ystems. Peak heat
flow is reduced b3' 85 per cent in the case,++of roof-spray and ro~?fpond svstem,~.
Furthermore the heat flow get,++reversed i.e. it flows out of the room in [he case
of wetted gunny bags. An integrated system of roof spray and air-conditioning
brings about a reduction of the order of 60--65 per cent in the peak heat.flow,
resulting into a saving of 40 per cent in the electrical consumption.
without any treatment. Various types of cooling cycle arrangement comprised :~ -;>t~v:itr~l:l,.)u~ ~ltot~e
system for roofs were tried out in three of the test driven clock having one re~.oii.~lJc~ ~n <~nc ~;~'~
rooms, while the fourth one with an untreated roof The p u m p controlled b~ thc ~,,<~ ,~)'clc ~ m m g c
served as the standard r o o m for comparison. lnefll a n d ~t solenoid valve w,. ~,,,.:(i ~ ,,:o~k li:c
The test conditions and as well as the duration of W~ller s p r a y
various tests are listed in Table 1. A layer of tarfelt tilt) H/ettcd gunn.! bags. l.n~pt 5 cement i~ags
was laid on the r o o f top o f each o f the four rooms. were spread on the r o o f top o[ ; t,,:st room ~e~- tilt:
Air conditioners were installed in the standard and tarfelt and water was sprinkled ~hree times ;~ da 5,
spray cooled test rooms at the southern walls ;~t 50 litres each time to keep il '~,~':i .round [he clock
1-2 m above floor, so as to enable comparison wilh
and without r o o f spray under the conditioned
state when desired. The thermostat used tk)r regula- DISCUSSION OF TEST RESUL['S
ting r o o m air temperature within _+ 1 "F were placed
at the centre o f each r o o m 1.2 m above the f l o o r Thermal equivalence Of test room,
Time totalisers were also connected to the com- The first series of tests withou~ any treatment was
pressors o f the air conditioners for noting the effec- confined to a comparison of the thermal conditions
tive hours of running. Separate electric k W H in all the test rooms with respec~ ~o indoor air and
meters were also connected in each room. Water inner surface temperature.-, ~,1 ihe ceiling. Thc
1 I1 111 IV
Test room 6 and 7th May 9 and 10th Ma? 19 and 20th May ~ ~d 4th Jura:
number 1972 1972 1972 ! 9"7?
3 No treatment Roof spray (intermittent) Air conditioned and roof Air conditioned and roof spra?
for 1], rain. after every 7~ spray day and night, on wetted gunny bags and
rain. during day only. table tim "on" during da~
and night
meters were installed for measuring the quantity deviations of m a x i m u m and minimum indoor ai~
o f water used in spray. temperatures and maximum and m i n i m u m inner
Temperatures were measured by 3 0 S . W . G . surface temperatures o f ceiling from the tempera-
calibrated copper constantan thermocouples con- ture conditions in the standard house are listed in
nected t h r o u g h a junction box and lead wires to a Tables 2 and 3. Only selected days are considered
precision self balancing indicating potentiometer. on which clear weather remained throughout the
The temperatures are correct to 0.25°F. Heat-flow day.
rates were measured by sensitive and individually It can be observed f r o m Tables 2 and 3 that the
calibrated heat flow meters consisting of several test r o o m s can be considered as thermally equiva-
differential thermal junctions. Curves showing the lent since the deviations in the air and ceiling surface
variation o f temperatures and heat flows have been temperatures are well within the accuracy of the
numbered as per test conditions and numbers o f the measurements. However these minor deviations
test r o o m s given in Table 1. can be attributed to non uniformity o f construction.
Table 4 R o o f ceiling maxima-minhna temperatures and heat flow under strattl/ied and unstratified contritions
Without 19~5 72 42"2 24.2 56.9 42.5 26.1 13.6 420 366
fan .............. . . . . . . . . . . . i+Mean-+420
tstratified) 205,72 42-2 20.8 58-3 43.3 26.9 13.6 517 474
With 3 6:72 40.8 28.9 51.7 34.7 20.3 6.8 449 285
fan ,- M ean-+ 263
lunstratified) 4 6'72 38.1 26.1 51.1 33-6 19.7 5-0 437 241 1
the order of 10C was recorded by the two thermo- reduction in maxima temperatures of roof and
couples one at 2.5 cm and the other at 2.5 m below' ceiling and the integrated h e a t f l o w at t h e c e i l i n g
ceiling. With fan circulation however, the tempera- surface per day whereas under the stratified con-
ture gradient vanishes t o n e a r l y 2+'C o n l y . D u e t o dition of the inside air so much reduction is n o t
the unstratified condition there is a c o n s i d e r a b l e o b s e r v e d a s s h o w n in T a b l e 4.
12 ,S'.P..lain and hZ R, Ra:'
60
ii
?
. . . . / \ / \
35 - / X / \
3o \ 2
25
2O
0 4 8 12 16 20 0 4 8 [2 t6 20
I_ 9-5-72 Time,_ t _ hr 10-5-72
J- -I -
Fi,e, 1.
6C
5~
5O
45
t)
40
~j
55
2
5O
E
2O
1 i I , ] ' ~ ~,_ ; i
Time, hr
9-5-72 ~ 10-5-72 --
i. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i
F&-, ~
E.werimental S t u d r on tlw Effbct Of" R o o f S p r a y Cooling on Unconditioned and Conditioned Buildim,,s' 13
(c) b u t o o r air temperature,~ test rooms with and without gunny bags roof treat-
Figure 3 shows the indoor air temperature varia- ment under the unconditioned state is shown in
tions at 1.2 m above floor level in the four test figure 4. The globe temperatures in the untreated
rooms. A drop of the order o f 3, 3.5 and 4~C test room are higher during day time as they include
respectively for the roof pond, r o o f spray and the effect of radiant heat gain from the hot ceiling.
wetted gunny bag treatments was measured. The difference in m a x i m u m globe temperatures
between the untreated and treated test units (roof
(d) Globe t e m p e r a t u r e s pond. roof spray, wetted gunny bags) is of the order
A comparison of the globe temperature of two of 5~C which is quite an appreciable figure.
45
~5 I
/
3
x.-×
2~ i i i i 1 i J [ i
:o3 4 8 12 le 2o 0 4 8 12 16 2o .,
Time, hr
9-5- 72 i 10-5-72
Fi~,. 3.
55
50
.15
,D 4 0
o
- 35
e~ J
e~
E 25
J:
20
__ I t I ; , i : I i i i
4 8 r2 16 2Q 0 4 8 12 16 20
9-5-72 Time, hr
. . . . . . . . ~ 10-5-72 --i
F&,. 4.
14 S. P. Jam and ~. R. Ra,~
(e) Heat flow through the ceiling {t) Intqwaled heat flow throuxt7 ~u~in:,:
For a better compttrisori o1" he{; llo\t ~ilt'{ ::tl]~_]
Besides lowering ceiling temperatures and the wllhoul r o o f treatments p,[et.,r:~led he,q: i!o~,.
corresponding indoor air temperatures in a room. through the ceilings have h c ~ compuied a n d
the important function of different roof treatments presented as bar charts in ligurc <- i~ i; noticed thal
is to reduce the heat flow into the room through the with these treatments, a tremelM,,tts reduc~i,m ~n
roof. This effect is illustrated in figure 5 for the total heat ltow, as much as 240 2(¢~ kcal m l)cr da~
unconditioned test rooms with and without can take place. ]'he maxhnun~ red[l,.;tion is obser'.ed
different roof treatments which is self explanatory for the wetted gunny bag lreatmcnt This brings ou~:
However, it should be appreciated that a large the efficiency of wetted gunn} ~ag Irea{mem !br
reduction of the order of 85 per cent in peak heat thick R.CC. r o o g in hot cJima~t
gains can be achieved by roof spray and roof pond In the case of condilioned te-; rooms with atW,
whereas heat flow gets reversed in the case o f without roof spra> the reducti,,m m ~he toia] heat
wetted gunny bags. flow ~s of the order of 420 kcaii m e per hr whe,a
In the case of unconditioned test rooms with stratilied ap conditions ~c~l.,'; lnd ~x nearl5
and without roof spray the peak heat gain is reduced 2 6 3 k c a l : m : per day when the 'ira~ified ~ir la,.er
5IV
to nearly 65 per cent. ~s disturbed by operating a f',i:~ .:,side
~.~(
I
~E 20
o~ o
4-
0 I0
20
I i i i ;
50 i 4 8 12 I~ 20 0 4 8 F~ # :'o
9-5 72 Time, r'i 10-5- 72
i. . . . . . . . i-
[ S r . 5,
] Untreated 24
50C
24 24
400
30C
20
~ WettedGunneybags
20
H H
~>" 20C
"E
"~ IOC
o .... . . . . . . . . . . . . .
O0 3
o
Igl
4---1oo
I
-200
~ v~24 ~ 24
Unconditioned Conditioned
-500
Fig. 6.
E.vperimental Study on the Effect o f R o o f Spray Cooling on Unconditioned and Conditioned Buildin~x 15
Degree hour rating j o t ceiling surface reduces the discomfort indoors: however, the
The total discomfort degree hours above a base wetted g u n n y bag system provides the best com-
temperature of 3 0 C , the d u r a t i o n for which such fortable conditions indoors. It appears that this
temperatures exist, the average of these degrees type of evaporative cooling system will be still
per hour and also the peak degree hour, for the more effective if some other convenient type of
three various treatments along with the untreated material is f o u n d to hold more water than the
one under the u n c o n d i t i o n e d state were compared g u n n y bags.
as presented in Table 5. A huge reduction of ceiling
degree hours takes place by the various treatments. For conditioned buildings
Moreover for the wetted g u n n y bags, the peak An integrated system of roof spray and air
temperature has been always less than 3ffC c o n d i t i o n i n g would result in considerable reduction
t h r o u g h o u t the diurnal cycle. in the cooling load and the consequent c o n s u m p t i o n
of electrical energy.
REFERENCES