Block B Body

INDUSTRIAL TRUSS SHED
Table of Contents 1
PART-I:INTRODUCTION AND GENERALDATA
1. Roof Truss
2. Analysis of Roof Truss
3. Building Description
4. Depth of foundation
PART-II:LOADS ON ROOF TRISS AND MODELLING

5. Dead Load
6. Live Load
7. Wind load
8. Earthquake Load
9. Load Case
10. Load Combination
11. Modeling
PART-III: 3D STRUCTURE ANALYSIS OUTPUT

12. Analysis
12.1. Analysis Result Output
12.2. Wind load Calculation table by ETABS 2015
13. ColumnDesign
14. Beam Design
15. Top/Bottom Chord-Rafter Design
16. Purlin Design
17. Strut/Inclined Member Design
18. Foundation Design
PART-IV: RESULT
19.Design Results (Design Result Drawing)
20. Conclusion
Designed By: Checked By: Approved By:

PART I: INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL DATA

2
1. ROOF TRUSS
Steel trusses are commonly used in commercial construction. They are pre-manufactured to
order and are made in an open web design .They are essentially axially loaded members
which are more efficient in resisting external loads since the cross section is nearly
uniformly stressed.They are extensively used, especially to span large gaps. Trusses are used
in proofs of single storey industrial buildings, long span floors and roofs of multistory
buildings, to resist gravity loads;the advantage of using steel trusses for building is possible.
They are ideal for barns, large storage buildings and commercial construction.
2. ANALYSIS OF ROOF TRUSS

Generally truss member are assumed to be joined together so as to transfer only the axial
forces and not moments and shears from one member to the adjacent member (they are
regarded as being pinned joints). The loads are assumed to be acting only at the nodes of the
trusses. The trusses may be provided over a single span, simply supported over the two end
supports, in which case they are usually statically determinate. Such trusses can be analyzed
manually by the method of joints or by the method of sections. SAP2000 is used for the
analysis of truss. From the analysis based on pinned joint assumption, one obtains only the
axial forces in the different members of the trusses. However, in actual design, the members
of the trusses are joined together by more than one bolt or by welding, either directly or
through larger size end gussets. Further some of the member, particularly chord member,
may be continuous over many nodes. Generally such joints enforce not only compatibility of
translation but also compatibility of rotation of member meeting at the joint. As a result, the
member of the trusses experience bending moment in addition to axial force. Further, the
load may be applied in between the nodes of the trusses, causing bending of the members.
Such stresses are referred to as secondary stresses. The secondary bending stresses can be
caused also by the eccentric connection of member at the joints. The analysis of the trusses
for the secondary moments and hence the secondary stresses can be carried out by an
indeterminate structural analysis, usually using computer software which is negotiated in
this paper. The magnitude of the secondary stresses due to joint rigidity depends upon the
stiffness of the joint and the stiffness of the members meeting at the joint. Normally the
secondary stresses in roof trusses may be disregarded. if the slenderness ratio of the chord
members is greater than 50 and that of the web member is greater than 100. The secondary
stresses cannot be neglected when they are induced due to application of loads on member in
between nodes and when the member is gained eccentrically.

3. BUILDING DISCRIPTION
3
General Features:
Project: Steel Structure
Location: Birtamode-2,Jhapa
Floor Area: 576.00 Sq.m.
Architectural feature:
Type of Building /Purpose: Industrial Building
Number of Floors: 1 floor steel truss
Height of Story: 6.0m
Total Height of Building: 8.1 m
Wall and Portion Brickwall/Cgi SheetPannel
Structural Features:
Structural System: SMRF
Foundation Type: Isolated
Columns: 16”x16” (400mm*400mm)
Beams: Tie Beam -12”x12”
Geotechnical Features:
Soil type: (Recommended for structural analysis) Fine sand, Loose and Dry, Soft clay intended
with moderate thumb pressure
Type III
Bearing Capacity: >100KN/M2&< 150KN/M2
Seismic Zone: V (As Per IS 1893:2002, Part-1)
Allowable Bearing Capacity As Per soil Type (NBC 205 Table No:3.1)
Foundation Reinforced concrete column has been provided
up to tie beam level. Then Steel Column sections
are connected with RCC column with design
anchor bolt. Base Slab with anchor bolt has been
provided as footing for the building.
Material
Grade of Concrete M20 for Column, Beam and Column Footing
Grade of Steel Fe 250 to IS 1786
Grade of Reinforcement Fe500 TMT
Unit of Concrete 25KN/M2
Unit weight of Brick Masonry 19.2KN/M2
Unit Weight of Cement Sand Plaster 20KN/M2
Youngs Modulus of Elasticity 5000√fck

Poisson’s Ratio For Concrete 0.20 and For Rebar 0.30

4
COLUMN LAYOUT PLAN
4. DEPTH OF FOUNDATION

The depth of foundation is mainly governed by factor such as scour depth and nature of subsoil
strata to place foundation, basement requirement and other environmental factors. As there are no 5
rivers in the immediate vicinity of the building site, chance of scouring is absent. The foundation
depth adopted forfooting1.5m from Ground Level.
The foundation has been designed for critical members or column carrying maximum axial load.
The geometry of each foundation has been determined to make sure whether, It requires mat
foundation. A mat foundation is provided as foundation decided as per study of the soil condition
of the site. The detail design is shown in Sample design.
PART II: LOADS ON ROOF TRUSSAND MODELLING
5. Dead load
Generally the dead load on the roof trusses in single storey industrial building consist of dead load
of claddings and dead load of purling, self –weight of the trusses in addition to the weight of bracing,
Roof Sheet etc. Further, additional special dead loads such as truss supported hoist dead load; special
ducting and ventilator weight etc. could contribute to roof truss dead loads. As the clear span length
(column free span length) increases, the self-weight of the resisting gable frames increase drastically.
In such cases roof trusses are more economical. Dead loads of floor slabs can be considerably
reduced by adopting composite slabs with profiled steel sheets. The Software Automatically takes
the self-weight as the section property is assigned.
6. Live load
The live load on roof trusses consist of the gravitational load due to erection and servicing as well as
dust load etc. and the intensity taken as par IS: 875-1975 (Part-2). Additional special live loads such
as snow loads in very cold climates, crane live loads in trusses supporting monorails may have to be
considered.
For Roof slope <= 10O Live Load =1.5KN/M2of Plan Area if Access is provided.
=0.75 KN/M2 of Plan Area if Access is not provided.
For Roof slope >10O Live Load=0.75 KN/M2less 0.02 KN/M2 for every degree increase in
slope over 10O
This Truss has Slope of 10O

Therefore,
Live Load=0.75KN/M2
7. Wind load

Wind load on the roof trusses, unless the roof slope is too high. Would be usually uplift force
perpendicular to the roof, due to suction effect of the wind blowing over the roof. Hence the wind 6
load on roof truss usually acts opposite to the gravity load, and its magnitude can be larger than
gravity loads, causing reversal of forces in truss members. Wind Load is calculated by using IS: 875-
1975 (Part-3).
Building truss type is Mono-slope roof with Rectangular clad.

Description Sign Input Unit
Width of building W 24.0 m
Length of the building L 24.0 m
Eves Height H 2.1 m
Span of truss 5.9 m
Maximum span of truss 5.9 m
Spacing of purlin 1.35 m
Pitch height P 2.1 m
Pitch angle α 10 Degree
Wind Load Calculation

Description Sign Input Unit
Basic wind speed Vb 47 m/sec
Probability factor k1 1.0 IS 1893 P-3, Table-1
Terrain/Height/Size factor k2 1 IS 1893 P-3, Table-2
Topography factor k3 1 IS 1893 P-3, Cl. 5.3.3
Design Wind speed Vz 38.72 m/sec
Design wind pressure Pd 899.543 N/m2
Height to width ratio H/W 0.33
Structure class B IS 1893 P-3, Cl. 5.3.2.2
Terrain category 3 IS 1893 P-3, Cl. 5.3.2.1
DESIGN WIND SPEED (Vz)

Vz= Vb X k1 X k2 X k3
Vz= design wind speed at any height in m/s
k1= probability factor (risk coefficient) (cl.5.3.1)
k2= terrain, height and structure size factor (cl.
5.5.2)
k3= topography factor
Vb= 47 m/s (for jhapa)

appendix- IS:875-1987 PART
3
k1= 1 IS:875-1987 PART 3,table1
cl. 5.3.3.1 for plane topography with upwind speed slope Q <
k3= 1 3
As per IS:875 part 3- 1987 table 2

Terrain category= 3
Class B A= 24 A refers wind direction

=
MAX DIM 20-50m B= 24 7
H= 8.1
k2= 1 As per IS:875 part 3- 1987 table 2
Vz= Vb X k1 X k2 X k3 m/sec
Height Vb k1 k2 k3 Vz
10 47 1 0.88 1 41.36 m/s
15 47 1 0.94 1 44.18 m/s
20 47 1 0.98 1 46.06 m/s
30 47 1 1.03 1 48.41 m/s
Design Wind Pressure

Pz=0.6Vz2 N/m2
Height Vz Pz
10 41.36 1026.39
1171.12
15 44.18 3
1272.91
20 46.06 4
1406.11
30 48.41 7
Design Wind Load (F)

F= Cf Ae Pz
Cf= force coefficient of
building
Ae= effective frontal area
Pz=design wind
load
A/B= 1
H/B= 0.3375
Cf= 0.8 See Table 4

bay dimension
Ae= 5.9 5.9x1 =5.9
F
Height Pz F(N/M) (KN/M)
4.8445
10 1026.39 4844.56 6
1171.12 5527.70
15 3 3 5.5277
1272.91 6008.15 6.0081
20 4 5 5
1406.11 6636.87 6.6368
30 7 2 7

8. Earthquake load
Since earthquake load on a building on the mass of the building, earthquake loads usually do not
govern the design of light industrial steel buildings. Wind load usually govern. However, in the case
of industrial building with a large mass located at the roof or upper floors, the earthquake load may
govern the design. These loads are calculated as per IS: 1893-2002.
9. Load Case
Following loads have been considered in the analysis of the building as per IS 800-2007.
a) Dead Load (DL)

b) Live load (LL)
c) Wind load (WL)
10.Load Combination
Following load Combination have been adopted as per IS 800:2007 Default by ETABS 2015.
11.Modeling
Various components of roof truss:

Roof truss are assumed to be jointed together so as to transfer only the axial force and not moments
and shear from one member to the adjacent member (They are regarded as pinned joints). The Loads
are assumed to be acting only at the node of the trusses.
Steel Material Properties

The Material properties of the structural steel member are listed below:
 Young’s modulus , E – 201Gpa
 Shear Modulus . G – 80.76Gpa
 Density -7850 KN/M3
 Poission’s ratio – 0.3

 Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (α) - 11.7  10-6/OC

9
3D MODEL
A model was selected on the basis of requirements of costumers. A three-dimensional structural

space truss model is prepared in ETABS 2015.
Figure- Finite Element Model in ETABS 2015

10

11
Figure- Finite Element Model in ETABS 2015 2D view A-A grid Section Detail

12
Figure- Finite Element Model in ETABS 2015 2D view 1-1 grid Extrude View

13
PART III- 3D STRUCTURAL ANALYSISOUTPUT
12. ANALYSIS
A three dimensional linear static analysis has been carried out using the standard software ETABS
2015.The structure is assumed be fixed at foundation level. Center to center dimension of the
structure has been considered in the analysis
The design of structural members is also carried out by the program ETABS 2015.The design of the
members is carried out by using as per IS 800:2007.
The design of Foundation has been carried out manually in spreadsheet. The Foundation has been
designed as per IS 456-2000.
12.1 ANALYSIS RESULT OUTPUT
After all the loading information’s is provided in structural modal, ETABS 2015 the structure
and gives the required output (i.e. Axial force and Shear force, etc.)
Figure: -Axial Force Diagram

14
Figure: -Shear Force Diagram

15
Figure: -Bending moment Diagram

16
Figure: -Deflection Diagram

17
Reinforcement Output

18

19

20

21

22
Figure: Plan of Building

12.2WIND LOAD CALCULATION TABLE BY ETABS 2015

23
TABLE: Auto Wind - IS 875-1987
Load Loading Exposure Width Cp,win Top
Pattern Method Type Angle d Cp,lee Story
deg
WIND Diaphragms From Diaphragms 0 0.8 0.5 Story3
WIND Diaphragms From Diaphragms 90 0.8 0.5 Story3
Bottom Include Terrain Structure

Story Parapet Vb Category Class k1 k3
meter/
sec kg/m³
Base No 47 2 B 1.07 1
Base No 47 2 B 1.07 1

12.3PMM INTERACTION RATIO CALCULATION TABLE BY ETABS 2015 24

TABLE: Steel Column

25
Envelope
Labe PMM
l Story Section Moment Interaction Check Combo V Ratio Class
C10 Story1 2-1SMC 300 0.027 = 0.017 + 0.007 + 0.003 DStlS8 0.001 Class 3
C37 Story1 2-1SMC 300 0.037 = 0.028 + 0 + 0.009 DStlS8 0.002 Class 3
C38 Story1 2-1SMC 300 0.037 = 0.028 + 0 + 0.009 DStlS8 0.002 Class 3

26
PART-IV: STRUCTURE DESIGN OUTPUT
ETABS 2016 Steel Frame Design

IS 800:2007 Steel Section Check (Strength Summary)
Element Details (Part 1 of 2)

Level Element Unique Name Location (mm) Combo Design Type Element Type Section
Story1 C10 1 0 DStlS8 Column Special Moment Frame 2-1SMC 300

Classification Rolled
Class 3 No
Design Code Parameters

ɣM0 ɣM1 An /Ag LLRF PLLF Stress ratio Limit
1.1 1.25 1 0.784 0.75 0.95
Section Properties
A (cm²) Izz (cm⁴) rzz (mm) Ze,zz (cm³) Av,z (cm²) Zp,zz (cm³) Iyz (cm⁴) It (cm⁴)
104.6 13654.3 114.2 910.3 54.1 1088.8 0 47.6
J (cm⁴) Iyy (cm⁴) ryy (mm) Ze,yy (cm³) Av,y (cm²) Zp,yy (cm³) Iw (cm⁶) h (mm)
47.6 6126.9 76.5 638.2 58.1 746.7 300
Material Properties
J (cm⁴) Iyy (cm⁴) ryy (mm)
47.6 6126.9 76.5
E (MPa) fy (MPa) fu (MPa)

210000 345 450
Stress Check Forces and Moments

Location (mm) N (kN) Mzz (kN-m) Myy (kN-m) Vy (kN) Vz (kN) To (kN-m)
0 -13.9342 -1.4557 -1.6866 -0.5556 -0.5542 0.0002

PMM Demand/Capacity (D/C) Ratio 9.3.2.2(a)

D/C Ratio = P / Pdy + Ky * Cmy * (My,span / Mdy; ) + KLT * 27
(Mz,span / Mdz; )
0.027 = 0.017 + 0.003 + 0.007
Basic Factors
Buckling Mode K Factor L Factor L Length (mm) KL/r
Major (z-z) 1.727 0.958 5750 86.903
Major Braced 0.738 0.958 5750 37.132
Minor (y-y) 1.758 0.958 5750 132.049
Minor Braced 0.743 0.958 5750 55.816
LTB 1.758 0.958 5750 132.049
Axial Force Design

N Force Td Capacity Nd Capacity Pdy Capacity Pz Capacity Pd Capacity
kN kN kN kN kN kN
Axial -13.9342 3280.8873 3280.8873 842.5683 1552.1483 842.5683
Tdg Tdn Ncr,T Ncr,TF An /Ag N /Nd

kN kN kN kN Unitless Unitless
3280.8873 3389.2992 2032.7999 1243.3991 1 0.004
Design Parameters for Axial Design

Curve α fcc (MPa) λ Φ χ fcd (MPa)
Major (z-z) c 0.49 274.44 1.121 1.354 0.473 148.38
MajorB (z-z) c 0.49 1503.22 0.479 0.683 0.855 268.04
Minor (y-y) c 0.49 118.86 1.704 2.32 0.257 80.55
MinorB (y-y) c 0.49 665.28 0.72 0.887 0.712 80.55
Torsional TF c 0.49 118.86 1.704 2.32 0.257 80.55
Moment Designs
M Moment Mspan Moment Md(yield) Capacity Mdv Capacity Mnd Capacity Md(LTB) Capacity
kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m
Major (z-z) -1.4557 -1.4557 285.499 285.499 285.499 201.6795
Minor (y-y) -1.6866 -1.6866 200.1675 200.1675 200.1675
Curve αLT λLT ΦLT χLT C1 Mcr (kN-m)

LTB c 0.49 0.729 0.896 0.706 2.7 590.2824
Cmy Cmz CmLT kz ky KLT My / Mdy Mz / Mdz α1 α2

Factors 0.4 0.4 0.4 1.001 1.003 0.997 -0.008 -0.005 2 2
Shear Design
V Force (kN) Vd Capacity (kN) To Capacity (kN-m) Stress Ratio Status Check
Major (y) 0.5556 1052.9488 0.0002 0.001 OK
Minor (z) 0.5542 979.2753 0.0002 0.001 OK
Shear Design
Vp (kN) kv (Unitless) ΛW (Unitless) Τb (MPa)
Reduction 1052.9488 0 0 1

28
Left End Reaction (kN) Load Combo Right End Reaction (kN) Load Combo
0.9882 DStlS10 0.9882 DStlS10


Story1 B203 344 1083.3 DStlS8 Beam Special Moment Frame ISMB250

Class 1 Yes

1.1 1.25 1 1 0.75 0.95
Section Properties
47.6 5131.6 103.9 410.5 31.3 410.5 0 18.7
18.7 334.5 26.5 53.5 17.3 53.5 57379.4 250
Material Properties
18.7 334.5 26.5

210000 250 410

1083.3 27.1256 -0.1196 0.0121 -0.9793 0.0044 2.058E-05 29
D/C Ratio = P / Pdy + Ky * Cmy * (My,span / Mdy; ) + KLT *
(Mz,span / Mdz; )
0.033 = 0 + 0.001 + 0.031
Basic Factors
Major (z-z) 1 0.949 5600 53.906
Major Braced 1 0.949 5600 53.906
Minor (y-y) 1 0.949 5600 211.137
Minor Braced 1 0.949 5600 211.137
LTB 1 0.949 5600 211.137
Axial Force Design

kN kN kN kN kN kN
Axial 27.1256 1080.6818 1080.6818 173.3205 965.0362 173.3205

1080.6818 1403.676 1646.5871 1646.5871 1 0.025

Major (z-z) a 0.21 713.26 0.592 0.716 0.893 202.95
MajorB (z-z) a 0.21 713.26 0.592 0.716 0.893 202.95
Minor (y-y) b 0.34 46.49 2.319 3.549 0.16 36.45
MinorB (y-y) b 0.34 46.49 2.319 3.549 0.16 36.45
Torsional TF b 0.34 346.29 0.85 0.971 0.693 157.58
Moment Designs
Major (z-z) -0.1196 -1.5274 93.2955 93.2955 93.2955 48.5632
Minor (y-y) 0.0121 0.0163 12.1591 12.1591 12.1591

LTB a 0.21 1.215 1.345 0.521 1.074 69.5052

Factors 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.001 -0.001 1 2
Shear Design
Major (y) 0.9793 226.3474 2.058E-05 0.004 OK
Minor (z) 0.0044 410.0497 2.058E-05 1.075E-05 OK
Shear Design
Reduction 226.3474 0 0 1
End Reaction Major Shear Forces

1.4918 DStlS10 1.5827 DStlS10 30


Story1 B226 2 2622.2 DStlS8 Beam Special Moment Frame ISNB100M

Class 1 Yes

1.1 1.25 1 1 0.75 0.95
Section Properties
15.5 234.3 38.9 41 9.9 41 0 468.6
468.6 234.3 38.9 41 9.9 41 114.3
Material Properties
468.6 234.3 38.9

210000 250 410
Stress Check Message - KL/r > 400 (IS 3.8, Table 3)

2622.2 39.0846 0.2065 -0.0736 -0.0186 0.0753 0.037

PMM Demand/Capacity (D/C) Ratio 9.3.1.1(an) 31

D/C Ratio = N / Nd
0.111 = 0.111
Basic Factors
Major (z-z) 1 1 2622.2 67.445
Major Braced 1 1 2622.2 67.445
Minor (y-y) 1 8.927 23408 602.066
Minor Braced 1 8.927 23408 602.066
LTB 1 8.927 23408 602.066
Axial Force Design

kN kN kN kN kN kN
Axial 39.0846 352.2727 352.2727 7.8109 291.6057 7.8109

352.2727 457.56 125192.2842 8.8626 1 0.111

Major (z-z) a 0.21 455.64 0.741 0.831 0.828 188.13
MajorB (z-z) a 0.21 455.64 0.741 0.831 0.828 188.13
Minor (y-y) a 0.21 5.72 6.612 23.035 0.022 5.04
MinorB (y-y) a 0.21 5.72 6.612 23.035 0.022 5.04
Torsional TF a 0.21 5.72 6.612 23.035 0.022 5.04
Moment Designs
Major (z-z) 0.2065 0.2065 9.3182 9.3182 9.3182 9.1941
Minor (y-y) -0.0736 -0.0736 9.3182 9.3182 9.3182

LTB a 0.21 0.26 0.54 0.987 2.618 151.6334

Factors 1 1 1 1 1 1 -0.008 0.022 2 2
Shear Design
Major (y) 0.0186 129.4787 0.037 1.433E-04 OK
Minor (z) 0.0753 129.4787 0.037 0.001 OK
Shear Design
Reduction 129.4787 0 0 1


32

Story3 D3 27 1918.1 DStlS8 Brace Special Moment Frame ISNB65M

Class 1 Yes

1.1 1.25 1 1 0.75 0.95
Section Properties
8.2 54 25.7 14.2 5.2 14.2 0 108
108 54 25.7 14.2 5.2 14.2 76.1
Material Properties
108 54 25.7

210000 345 450

1918.1 11.8935 -0.0106 -0.1058 0.0794 0.0558 0.0275
PMM Demand/Capacity (D/C) Ratio 9.3.1.1(an)

D/C Ratio = N / Nd
0.046 = 0.046
Basic Factors
Major (z-z) 1 1 1918.1 74.73
Major Braced 1 1 1918.1 74.73


Minor (y-y) 1 1 1918.1 74.73 33
Minor Braced 1 1 1918.1 74.73
LTB 1 1 1918.1 74.73
Axial Force Design

kN kN kN kN kN kN
Axial 11.8935 257.1818 257.1818 177.5943 177.5943 177.5943

257.1818 265.68 66230.7664 304.3283 1 0.046

Major (z-z) a 0.21 371.13 0.964 1.045 0.691 216.58
MajorB (z-z) a 0.21 371.13 0.964 1.045 0.691 216.58
Minor (y-y) a 0.21 371.13 0.964 1.045 0.691 216.58
MinorB (y-y) a 0.21 371.13 0.964 1.045 0.691 216.58
Torsional TF a 0.21 371.13 0.964 1.045 0.691 216.58
Moment Designs
Major (z-z) -0.0106 -0.0106 4.4536 4.4536 4.4536 4.4536
Minor (y-y) -0.1058 -0.1058 4.4536 4.4536 4.4536

LTB a 0.21 0.173 0.512 1 1 162.962

Factors 1 1 1 1 1 1 -0.024 -0.002 2 2
Shear Design
Major (y) 0.0794 94.5278 0.0275 0.001 OK
Minor (z) 0.0558 94.5278 0.0275 0.001 OK
Shear Design
Reduction 94.5278 0 0 1
End Reaction Axial Forces

11.7609 DStlS10 11.8935 DStlS10
13.PURLIN DESIGN


34

Story3 B218 359 18677 DStlS8 Beam Special Moment Frame ISNB65M

Class 1 Yes

1.1 1.25 1 1 0.75 0.95
Section Properties
8.2 54 25.7 14.2 5.2 14.2 0 108
108 54 25.7 14.2 5.2 14.2 76.1
Material Properties
108 54 25.7

210000 345 450

18677 1.5476 -0.0396 0.0011 -0.1917 0.0021 0.0252

D/C Ratio = P / Pdy + Ky * Cmy * (My,span / Mdy; ) + KLT *
(Mz,span / Mdz; )
0.063 = 0 + 0.001 + 0.063
Basic Factors
Major (z-z) 1 0.25 5900 229.87


Major Braced 1 0.25 5900 229.87 35
Minor (y-y) 1 0.25 5900 229.87
Minor Braced 1 0.25 5900 229.87
LTB 1 0.25 5900 229.87
Axial Force Design

kN kN kN kN kN kN
Axial 1.5476 257.1818 257.1818 27.229 27.229 27.229

257.1818 265.68 66230.7664 32.164 1 0.006

Major (z-z) a 0.21 39.22 2.966 5.188 0.106 33.21
MajorB (z-z) a 0.21 39.22 2.966 5.188 0.106 33.21
Minor (y-y) a 0.21 39.22 2.966 5.188 0.106 33.21
MinorB (y-y) a 0.21 39.22 2.966 5.188 0.106 33.21
Torsional TF a 0.21 39.22 2.966 5.188 0.106 33.21
Moment Designs
Major (z-z) -0.0396 -0.2725 4.4536 4.4536 4.4536 4.3491
Minor (y-y) 0.0011 0.0028 4.4536 4.4536 4.4536

LTB a 0.21 0.304 0.557 0.977 1 52.9785

Factors 1 1 1 1 1 1 2.546E-04 -0.009 2 2
Shear Design
Major (y) 0.1917 94.5278 0.0252 0.002 OK
Minor (z) 0.0021 94.5278 0.0252 2.197E-05 OK
Shear Design
Reduction 94.5278 0 0 1
End Reaction Major Shear Forces

0.2708 DStlS10 0.2708 DStlS10
14. SAMPLE FOUNDATION DESIGN

FOUNDATION LOAD:

36
SAMPLE ISOLATED FOOTING DESIGN:
Isolated Footing

1 Footing Size Design

37
Load Pu 120 KN
Design Load P 88 KN
Moment in x dir Mux 0 KN-m

Moment in y dir Muy 0 KN-m
Column size cx 400 mm

cy 400 mm
SBC q 110 KN/sqm
Footing Size required A req 0.80 sqmm
L 1.20 meters
Footing Size Provided
B 1.20 meters
Area Provided A prvd 1.44 meters
Zx 0.29
Zx 0.29
Net upward pressure Nup 61 KNm2
Footing Size OK
2 Slab Design
lx 0.400
ly 0.400
Bending Moment in x dir Mx 7 KN-m

Bending Moment in y dir My 7 KN-m

Concrete fck 20 MPa

Steel fy 500 MPa 38
Minimum Depth Required dmin 53
Depth Provided D 500 mm

Clear Cover c 50 mm
Effective Cover d' 56 mm
Effective Depth d' 444 mm
Spacing c/c in mm
Area of Steel
12# 16# 20#
590
212 c/c 377 c/c
533 sqmm c/c
590
212 c/c 377 c/c
533 sqmm c/c
Minimum Ast required across x direcion
Minimum Ast required across y direcion
Ast across x direction 12 mm dia @ 125 mm c/c 905 sqmm

Ast across y direction 12 mm dia @ 125 mm c/c 905 sqmm
3 One Way Shear along x direction

Vu1 -5 KN 39
ζv -0.009 MPa
ζc 0.260 MPa
Vc1 139 KN
One Way Shear Check OK
4 One Way Shear along y direction
Vu1 -5 KN
ζv -0.009 MPa
ζc 0.260 MPa
Vc1 139 KN
One Way Shear Check OK
5 Two Way Shear

Vu2 67 KN
ζv 0.044 MPa
ks*ζc 1.118 MPa

Vc1 1676 KN
Two Way Shear Check OK

L= 1.20 meters 40
400
B
400
= 1.20 meters
500 mm
200 mm
12 mm dia @ 125 mm c/c 12 mm dia @ 125 mm c/c
PART-V: RESULT
15. DESIGN RESULTS:

A three-dimensional structural space truss model is prepared in ETABS 2015.A Linear Elastic Three
Dimensional Analysis has been carried out. The static analysis was carried out by using IS Code 41
800:2007.
Here, here according to the structural analysis result following members Properties and
Sections are satisfied and safe to use, as described below:
The Material properties of the structural steel member are listed below:
 Young’s modulus , E – 201Gap
 Shear Modulus. G – 80.76Gap
 Density -7850 KN/M3
 Poisson’s ratio – 0.3
 Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (α) - 11.7  10-6/OC
Summary of Design Section details:

SN Description Size Weight Remarks
(Kg/m)
1 All Column Concrete 400 X 400 mm
2 Steel Column 2- ISMC D=300mm 41.5

300 T=13.6mm
2 Main Beam ISMB 250 D=250mm 37.3
T=12.5mm
3 Top/Bottom Chord D=114.3mm 12.2
Rafter ISNB 100M t =4.5 mm
4 Strut ISNB 65 D=76.1mm 6.42 D= Out Diameter
t =3.6 mm T=Thickness
5 Purlin D=76.1mm 6.42
(ISNB65) t =3.6 mm
6 Roof Sheet CGI 26guage
7 Use 5 mm fillet size weld connection for Truss members (Rafter, Purlin, Strut and
Runners) and 6.50 mm fillet weld size for the I section and Plates.
8 Use 10mm thick base plate with 8 no.16/20mm dia. bolt
Note:
Please refer Drawings for Details
Depth of foundation = 1.5m

Footing
F4 = 1.2m X 1.2m

Rebar = 12mm @125c/c both ways

42
Ground Floor Column:
RCC COLUMN (400x400) = 8 -16mm dia
Beam
Tie Beam size = 300mmX300mm
Rebars in beam:
Beam: Bottom bar = 2 nos. 16mm (Regular)
Top bar: 2 nos. 16mm (Regular)

43
16. CONCLUSION
After the analysis of the building components, the building is found to be safe against theitsself-
weight, Live load and wind load. Since earthquake load on a building on the mass of the building,
earthquake loads usually do not govern the design of light industrial steel buildings. Wind load
usually govern. However, in the case of industrial building with a large mass located at the roof or
upper floors, the earthquake load may govern the design. The section sizes and reinforcement are
sufficient to withstand all kinds of possible axial, shear, flexural and torsional forces. The design is
good enough to assure them life safety level of performance under the wind and live load.
Recommendation
Design and Construction of the structure are inter-related jobs. A performance of a building depends
upon a work and material quality during the construction more than the intensions pursued during the
structural design. A large percentage of structural failures are attributed due to poor quality of
construction. Therefore, to assure the proper safety, material and work quality should be maintained
during the construction. However, Designer will not be responsible for any faulty constructions at
site.
1. It is recommended to strictly follow the section size and reinforcement provided in the
structural drawings.
2. It is recommended the site engineer should be responsible to handle the problems that may
arise during the construction. She/he shall be responsible for maintaining the material and
process quality during the construction.
3. It is strictly recommended to maintain the standard in the grade of cement and reinforcement
steel. It is recommended to run a cube test to ensure the strength and quality of the concrete
ratio used. It is also recommended to run a re-bending test of the reinforcement steels to
ensure the quality of steel used.
4. It is recommended to carry out the soil test to check the bearing capacity before construction
so as to ensure the assumed value of 110KN/M2 is within safe limit

44
Live Load & Wind Load

45

Block B Body

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Block B Body

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

INDUSTRIAL TRUSS SHED

PART-II:LOADS ON ROOF TRISS AND MODELLING

PART-III: 3D STRUCTURE ANALYSIS OUTPUT

Designed By: Checked By: Approved By:

PART I: INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL DATA

2. ANALYSIS OF ROOF TRUSS

Designed By: Checked By: Approved By:

Designed By: Checked By: Approved By:

Poisson’s Ratio For Concrete 0.20 and For Rebar 0.30

COLUMN LAYOUT PLAN

Designed By: Checked By: Approved By:

PART II: LOADS ON ROOF TRUSSAND MODELLING

This Truss has Slope of 10O

Designed By: Checked By: Approved By:

Building truss type is Mono-slope roof with Rectangular clad.

Wind Load Calculation

DESIGN WIND SPEED (Vz)

Vb= 47 m/s (for jhapa)

k1= 1 IS:875-1987 PART 3,table1

As per IS:875 part 3- 1987 table 2

Designed By: Checked By: Approved By:

Design Wind Pressure

Design Wind Load (F)

Cf= 0.8 See Table 4

Designed By: Checked By: Approved By:

a) Dead Load (DL)

Various components of roof truss:

Steel Material Properties

Designed By: Checked By: Approved By:

 Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (α) - 11.7  10-6/OC

A model was selected on the basis of requirements of costumers. A three-dimensional structural

Figure- Finite Element Model in ETABS 2015

Designed By: Checked By: Approved By:

Designed By: Checked By: Approved By:

Designed By: Checked By: Approved By:

Designed By: Checked By: Approved By:

PART III- 3D STRUCTURAL ANALYSISOUTPUT

12.1 ANALYSIS RESULT OUTPUT

Figure: -Axial Force Diagram

Designed By: Checked By: Approved By:

Figure: -Shear Force Diagram

Designed By: Checked By: Approved By:

Figure: -Bending moment Diagram

Designed By: Checked By: Approved By:

Figure: -Deflection Diagram

Designed By: Checked By: Approved By:

Designed By: Checked By: Approved By:

Designed By: Checked By: Approved By:

Designed By: Checked By: Approved By:

Designed By: Checked By: Approved By:

Designed By: Checked By: Approved By:

Figure: Plan of Building

Designed By: Checked By: Approved By:

12.2WIND LOAD CALCULATION TABLE BY ETABS 2015

Bottom Include Terrain Structure

Designed By: Checked By: Approved By:

12.3PMM INTERACTION RATIO CALCULATION TABLE BY ETABS 2015 24

Designed By: Checked By: Approved By:

TABLE: Steel Column

Designed By: Checked By: Approved By:

ETABS 2016 Steel Frame Design

Element Details (Part 1 of 2)