International Journal of Applied Mathematics &

Statistical Sciences (IJAMSS)

ISSN (P): 2319–3972; ISSN (E): 2319–3980
Vol. 11, Issue 2, Jul–Dec 2022; 43–50
© IASET

FUNCTIONS OF BOUNDED RADIUS ROTATION OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS

S.Prema1 & Bhuvaneswari Raja2

1
Assistant Professor, Department of Mathematics, Rajalakshmi Institute of Technology, Chennai-600124, India
2
Assistant Professor, Department of Mathematics, Aalim Muhammed Salegh College of Engineering, Chennai, India.

ABSTRACT

The classes Vk (α ) , Rk (α ) , Vk 1 (α ) and Rk 1 (α ) of analytic function, We establish a relation between the functions of

bounded boundary and bounded radius rotations.

KEYWORDS: Analytic, Analytic Functions with Bounded Radius and Boundary Rotations, Starlike, Convex,
Subordination

MATHEMATICS SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION: 30C45

Article History
Received: 16 Aug 2022 | Revised: 17 Aug 2022 | Accepted: 24 Aug 2022

1. INTRODUCTION

Let A be the class of functions f of the form

∞
f ( z ) = z + ∑ an z n
n =2 (1.1)

Which are analytic in the unit disc E = {z: |z| < 1}.

The definition of subordination is f ∈A is subordinate to g ∈ A, written as f p g ,there exists Schwarz function

w(z) with w(0) = 0 and |w(z)| < 1 ( z ∈ E) such that f(z) = g(w(z)), In particular, when g is univalent, then the above
subordination is equivalent to f(0)’ = g(0) and f(E) ⊆ g(E), for any two analytic functions

∞ ∞
f ( z ) = ∑ an z n , g ( z ) = ∑ bn z n ( z ∈ E ). (1.2)
n=0 n=0

then convolution

∞
( f * g )( z ) = ∑ anbn z n (z ∈ E) (1.3)
n =0

We denote by s (α ), c (α ), (0 ≤ α < 1) the classes of starlike and convex functions of order

*
α,

www.iaset.us editor@iaset.us
44 S.Prem1 & Bhuvaneswari Raja

respectively defined by

 zf ′( z ) 
s* (α ) =  f ∈ A : Re > α, z ∈ E
 f ( z)  (1.4)
{
c(α ) = f ∈ A; zf ′( z ) ∈ s (α ), z ∈ E
*
}
For α = 0 , we have the well know classes of starlike and convex univalent functions denoted s* and c,
respectively.

Let Pk (α ) be the class of functions P(z) analytic in the unit disc E satisfying the properties P(0)=1 and

2π
P( z ) − α
∫ Re
0
1−α
dθ ≤ kπ , (1.5)

Where z = re iθ , k ≥ 2, and 0 ≤ α < 1 , using Herglotz – Stieltijes formula

k 1 k 1
P ( z ) =  +  P1 ( z ) −  −  P2 ( z ), z∈E (1.6)
 4 2  4 2

Where P(α ) is the class of functions with real part greater then α and Pi ∈ P(α ), for i = 1, 2 we define the
following classes


Rk (α ) =  f : f ∈ A and
[λz f ′′( z ) + zf ′( z )
2
] 
∈ Pk (α ), 0 ≤ λ < 1, t > 0
 λz ( f ′( z ) − f ′(− z )) + (1 − λ )( f ( z ) − f ( − z )) 
(1.7)


Vk (α ) =  f : f ∈ A and
[(λz 2
f ′′( z ) + zf ′( z ) ]′ 

∈ Pk (α ), 0 ≤ λ < 1, t > 0
′
 λz ( f ′′( z ) − f ′′(− z )) + [(1 − λ )( f ′( z ) − f ′( − z )] 

 


Rk 1 (α ) =  f : f ∈ A and
[
γλ z f ′′′( z ) + ( 2γλ + γ + λ ) z f ′′( z ) + zf ′( z )
3 2
∈ P (α
]
),



γλ z ( f ′′( z ) − f ′′( − z )) + (λ − γ ) z ( f ′( z ) − f ′( − z )
2 k (1.8)
 
 + (1 − λ + γ )( f ( z ) − f ( − z )) 
0 ≤ λ ≤ γ < 1.

 
 ′ 

Vk1 (α ) =  f : f ∈ A and
[
γλz 3 f ′′′( z ) + (2γλ + γ + λ ) z 2 f ′′( z ) + zf ′( z ) 
∈ Pk (α ), 
]
 γλz ( f ′′( z ) − f ′′(− z )) + (λ − γ ) z ( f ′( z ) − f ′(− z )
2
 (1.9)
 ′ 
 + [(1 − λ + γ )( f ( z ) − f (− z )] 
0 ≤ λ ≤ γ < 1.

We note that

f ∈ Vk (λ ) ⇔ zf ′ ∈ Rk (λ ) f ∈ Vk1 (λ ) ⇔ zf ′ ∈ Rk1 (λ ) (1.10)

Impact Factor (JCC): 6.6810 NAAS Rating 3.45

Functions of Bounded Radius Rotation of Analytic Functions 45

For λ = 0, t = 0, γ = 0 we obtain the well known classes Rk, Rk1, Vk, Vk1 of analytic functions with bounded
radius and bounded boundary rotations, respectively. These classes are studied by Noor [3] in more details, also it can

Rk (α ) = S * (α ) and V2 (α ) = c(α ) . f ∈ c(α )

2
easily by seen Goel [6] proved that implies that f ∈ s * (α ) and

f ∈ S * (α )

 4α (1 − 2α ) 1
 2α +1
,α ≠
Where β = β (α ) =  4 − 2 2
1
 ln 2 1
,α =
2 2

and the result is sharp. In this paper, we prove the result of Goel [6] for the classes Vk (α ) , Rk (α ) , Vk 1 (α ) and

Rk1 (α ) by using convolution and Subordination techniques.

2. PRELIMINARY RESULTS

We need the following results to obtain our results.

Lemma 2.1:

Let u = u1 + iu2 , v = v1 + iv2 and Ψ (u, v) be a complex valued function satisfying the conditions

(i) Ψ (u, v) is continuous in a domain D ⊂ C .

2

(ii)(1,0) ∈ D and Reψ (1,0) > 0, when ever (iu 2 , v1 ) ≤ 0 when ever (iu2 , v1 ) ∈ D and v1 ≤ − 1 (1 + u22 )
2

If h( z ) = 1 + c1 z + ....... is a function analytic in E. Such that (h( z), zh′( z)) ∈ D and

Reψ (h( z ), zh′( z )) > 0 for z ∈ E , then Re h(z)>0 in E.

3. MAIN RESULTS

Theorem 3.1

Let f ∈ Vk (α ), then f ∈ Rk (α ), where

1 (1 + λ ) 2 + 4α 2 + 4α 2 λ2 − 4α (1 + λ ) + 8α 2 λ − 4α (1 + λ )
β = (2α − (1 + λ ) + 2αλ ) +
4 + 8 − 8λ + 8λ + (1 + λ2 ).

Proof:

Let

(λz 2 f ′′( z ) + zf ′( z ))
= (1 − β ) P ( z ) + β
λz ( f ( z ) − f (− z )) + (1 − λ )( f ( z ) − f (− z )) (3.1)

www.iaset.us editor@iaset.us
46 S.Prem1 & Bhuvaneswari Raja

 k 1  k 1 
= (1 − β )  +  P1 ( z ) −  −  P2 ( z ) + β (3.2)
 4 2  4 2 
P(z) is analytic in E with P(0)=1 then

′
[ [λ z )]
f ′′( z ) + z f ′ ( z )
2
= (1 − β ) p ( z ) + β
λz [ f ′( z ) − f ′(− z )] + (1 − λ ) [ f ( z ) − f (− z )]
(3.3)
λz 2 f ′′( z ) + ztf ′( z ) + (1 − β ) p′( z )
 
+ + (1 − λ ) z + λzf ′(− z ) 
λz[ f ′( z ) − f ′(− z )] + (1 − λ )(1 − β ) p ( z ) + β

′
1  [[
λ z 2 f ′′( z ) + z f ′ ( z ) )] −α 

(1 − α )  λz [ f ′( z ) − f ′( − z )] + (1 − λ ) [ f ( z ) − f ( − z )] 
 

=
1 
(1 − β ) p ( z ) + β − α +
[ 2
]
λz f ′′( z ) + zλf ′( z ) + (1 − λ ) z .(1 − β ) p′( z )  (3.4)
(1 − α )  λz[ f ′( z ) − f ′( − z )] + (1 − λ )[(1 − β ) p ( z ) + β ]
  1  
   ( L + M ) p′( z ) 
β −α 1− β   (1 − β )  
= + p( z ) +   
1−α 1−α  β
  ( N + Q )( p ( z ) + 


 1 − β 


Where

L = λz 2 f ′′( z )

M = λzf ′( z ) + (1 − λ ) z

N = λz[ f ′( z ) − f ′(tz )]

Q = (1 − λ )

Since f ∈ Vk (α ) , it implies that

  1  
  (L + M ) p′( z ) 
β −α 1− β  1− β 
= + p( z ) +   ∈ pk , z∈E (3.5)
1−α 1−α   β 
 (N + Q ) p( z ) + 
  (1 − β  

We define

1 z b z
ϕ a ,b ( z ) = +
1 + b (1 − z )α 1 + b (1 − z )1+ a (3.6)

1 β
with a= , b= by using (3.1) with convolution, see [5], we have, that
1− β 1− β
Impact Factor (JCC): 6.6810 NAAS Rating 3.45
Functions of Bounded Radius Rotation of Analytic Functions 47

ϕ a ,b ( z )  k 1  ϕ ( z )   k 1  ϕ ( z ) 
* p( z ) =  +   a ,b * p1 ( z ) −  −   a ,b * p2 ( z )
z  4 2  z   4 2 z 

Implies

′
a ( L + M ) p′( z )  k 1  a ( L + M ) p1 ( z )   k 1 
p( z ) + =  +  p1 ( z ) + − + 
( N + Q − R)( p ( z ) + b)  4 2  ( N + Q)( p1 ( z ) + b   4 2 
 
 ′ 
 p ( z ) + a ( L + M ) p2 ( z ) 
 2 ( N + Q)( p2 ( z ) + b 
  (3.7)

Thus from (3.5) and (3.7) we have

′
β − α (1 − β )  a ( L + M ) pi ( z ) 
+  pi ( z ) + ∈ p i = 1,2 (3.8)
1 − α (1 − α )  ( N + Q )( pi ( z ) + b 
 

′
We now from functional ψ (u, v) by choosing u = pi ( z ), v = zpi ( z ) in (3.8) and note that the first two
conditions of Lemma 2.1 are likely satisfied, we check the condition as follows

  
  ′ 
1   λz f ′′( z ) pi ( z ) + f ′( z )v1
2

Re[ψ (iu 2 , v1 )] = ( β − α ) + Re 
1−α   β  ′
   iu 2 + [λz ( f ′′( z ) − f ′′(tz )] + (1 − λ )[ f ′( z ) − f ′( z ) ] 
  1− β  
 
  λz 2 f ′′( z ) p ′ ( z ) + f ′( z )v  β  
1 
1   i
 (1 − β  
= ( β − α ) + ′
1−α   β  λz ( f ′′( z ) + f ′( z ) ) + (1 − λ )  
  iu 2 +   
  1 − β  ( f ( z ) − f ( z ) )  
 
  β  
1 
1
(1 (
+ u 2
2
) f ′ ( z ) + λ z 2
f ′′( z)) 
1− β   
≤ (β − α ) −
2   
1−α   2  β 2  
 u + 
  (
  ( f ( z ) − f ( z ) ) + λz 2 f ′′( z ) )
  1 − β   
2
  
 β 
(
2( β − α ) − (1 + u22 ) f ′( z ) + λz 2 f ′′( z )  ) 
1 − β 
= 
  β  
2

2 u 22 + 

(
 ( f ( z ) − f ( z ) + λz 2 f ′′( z ) ) (3.9)

  1 − β  

A + Bu 22
= , 2C > 0,
2c

www.iaset.us editor@iaset.us
48 S.Prem1 & Bhuvaneswari Raja

Where

β
A=
(1 − β ) 2
[2(β − α ) β [( f ( z) − f ( z)] + λ z 2 f ′′ ( z ) ]′ − [ f ′( z ) + λz 2 f ′′( z ) ] (1 − β )]
1
B= [2( β − α ) (1 − β ) [( f ( z ) − f ( z )] + λ z 2 f ′′ ( z ) ]′′ − β [ f ′( z ) + λz 2 f ′′( z ) ] (3.10)
(1 − β )
 2  β 2 
C = u 2 +    (1 − α ) [( f ( z ) − f ( z )] + (1 + λ ) λ z 2 f ′′ ( z ) ]′
  1 − β  

The right hand side of (3.9) is negative if A ≤ 0 we have

1 (1 + λ ) 2 + 4α 2 + 4α 2 λ2 − 4α (1 + λ ) + 8α 2 λ − 4α (1 + λ )
β = β (α ) = (2α − (1 + λ ) + 2αλ ) +
4 + 8 − 8λ + 8λ + (1 + λ2 ).

Theorem 3.2

Let f ∈ Vk1 (α ), then f ∈ Rk1 (α ), where

(1 + λ + γ ) 2 + 4α 2 λ2γ + 6α 2γ 2 λ2 − 4α (1 + γ )(1 + λ )
1
β = (2α − (1 + λ )(1 + γ ) + 2αγλ + + 16α 2 λγ − 4αt (1 + λ )(1 + γ ) + 8(1 + λ )(1 + γ ) − 12γλ
4
+ (1 + γ 2 )(1 + λ2 ).

REFERENCE

1. B.Pinchuk, “Functions of bounded boundary rotation,” Israel journal of Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp.6-16,
1971.

2. K.S.Padmanabhan and R.Parvathan, “Properties of a class of functions with bounded boundary rotation,”
AnnalesPolomiciMathematici, vol.31, no.3, pp.311-323, 1975.

3. K.I. Noor, “Some properties of certain analytic function,”journal of natural geometry, vol .7, no.1, pp.11-20,
1995

4. K.I.Noor, “on some subclassesof function with bounded radius and bounded boundary rotation,”panamerican
mathematical journal, vol.6, no.1, pp.75-81, 1996

5. K.L.Noor, “on analytic function related to certain family of integral operators,”journal of inequalities in pure
and applied mathematics, vol.7, no.2, article 69, 6pages, 2006.

6. R.N.Goel, “functions starlike and convex of order α ,” Journal of the London Mathematical society.Second
Series, vol.s2-9, no.1, pp.128-130, 1974

7. D.A.Brannan, “on functions of bounded boundary rotation .I,” proceedings of the Edinburgh mathematical
society .series II, vol.16, pp.339-347, 1969

8. D.Pinchuk, “on starlike and convex function order a,” duke mathematical journal, vol.35, pp.721-734, 1968

9. S.S.Miller, “Differential in equalities and caratheodoryfunctions,”bulletin of the American mathematical society,

Impact Factor (JCC): 6.6810 NAAS Rating 3.45

Functions of Bounded Radius Rotation of Analytic Functions 49

vol.81, pp.79-81, 1975.

10. S.S.Miller and P.T.Mocanu, “differential subordinations :theory and application ,vol.225of monographs and text
bookes in pure and applied mathematicals,” marcel dekker ,new york ,NY,USA,2000

11. Z.Nahari conformal mappings, Dover, New [11] Z.Nahari conformal mappings, Dover, NewYork, NY, USA, 1952

12. I.S.Jack, “functions starlike and convex of order a,”journal of the London mathematical society .second series,
vol.3, pp.469-474, 1971

13. T.H.MacGregor, “A subordination for convex function of order a,” journal of the London mathematical society
second series, vol.9, pp.530-536, 1975.

www.iaset.us editor@iaset.us