1. Emotions can influence decisions in an irrational or partial way by focusing only on personal interests and immediate concerns rather than taking a broader perspective.
2. Studies have shown that emotions can guide beneficial choices through non-conscious biases before conscious reasoning takes over. People with head injuries who lacked these emotional influences made disadvantageous choices in gambling tasks even after knowing the best strategies.
3. While emotions can influence decisions negatively if they are not checked, research also suggests emotions help facilitate reasoning and guide people towards choices that benefit them without conscious thought. Emotions appear to play a foundation role in cognitive and behavioral processes.
1. Emotions can influence decisions in an irrational or partial way by focusing only on personal interests and immediate concerns rather than taking a broader perspective.
2. Studies have shown that emotions can guide beneficial choices through non-conscious biases before conscious reasoning takes over. People with head injuries who lacked these emotional influences made disadvantageous choices in gambling tasks even after knowing the best strategies.
3. While emotions can influence decisions negatively if they are not checked, research also suggests emotions help facilitate reasoning and guide people towards choices that benefit them without conscious thought. Emotions appear to play a foundation role in cognitive and behavioral processes.
1. Emotions can influence decisions in an irrational or partial way by focusing only on personal interests and immediate concerns rather than taking a broader perspective.
2. Studies have shown that emotions can guide beneficial choices through non-conscious biases before conscious reasoning takes over. People with head injuries who lacked these emotional influences made disadvantageous choices in gambling tasks even after knowing the best strategies.
3. While emotions can influence decisions negatively if they are not checked, research also suggests emotions help facilitate reasoning and guide people towards choices that benefit them without conscious thought. Emotions appear to play a foundation role in cognitive and behavioral processes.
that you can get yourself back together and think straight again.
2. The second partial nature
of emotion is that it draws its perspective from personal interest. It addresses subjective concerns and takes action primarily to satisfy such concerns (O'Donohue, & Kitchener, 1996). For example, Gemma broke up with her boyfriend. She then dropped out of school because she cannot bear to see him in campus with another girl. In this situation, Gemma sacrificed her education, wasting time and money for a broken relationship. A highly partial perspective is interested only in the immediate situation; no rational explanations from a broader perspective are relevant.
3.
4.
5. The Capricious Nature of
Feelings
6. The third problem with
emotions is that it rises up for arbitrary reasons. For example, you did not give money to an old beggar asking for alms simply because she tugged at your shirt and startled you. Aspects or situations that have nothing to do in moral situations could rile up your emotion, and this emotion will certainly influence your subsequent moral judgment (Pizarro, 2000). 7.
8. How Emotions Help in
Making the Right Decisions
9. Although several studies
point out the negative effects of emotion in making decisions, contemporary research on how emotions facilitate reasoning is also catching up. Several studies suggest that emotions are the foundation of all our cognitive and behavioral processes; and emotional responses often guide a person in making beneficial choices without any conscious reasoning (Arnold, 1960; Damsio, 2003) 10. In this line of thought, researchers studied two groups of research participants. Group 1 was made up of relatively healthy people with no history of head injury; while the second group was composed of those with decision-making defects resulting from head injury. Both groups were measured while performing gambling tasks. The researchers observed that Group 1 began to choose cards that were to their advantage even before they knew what strategy worked best. While the second group continued to choose disadvantageously even though they already knew what the best card strategy was. Moreover, in the same gambling task, the researchers observed that the skin properties of the first group changed in response to thinking about risky choices, even though the participants did not know the move was actually risky. The second group, on the other hand, never had such reaction. The study suggested, "In normal individuals, non-conscious biases guide behavior before conscious knowledge does (Bechara, et al., media, mass media, etc.). Therefore, the individual plays a pivotal role as a free moral agent in analyzing, choosing, and valuing what he/she considers as most important when he/she makes his/her choices 11. Society, as a whole, functions as a way of controlling the behavior of an individual. It becomes necessary to impose social controls and sanctions so that the individual would be guided accordingly. To a
certain extent, society coerces its members to follow