Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case Studies-Web CT
Case Studies-Web CT
Indonesia
Using many of his arguments, I have better understanding why the reform efforts in
Indonesia have demostrated a notable result. Indonesian government tried to implement
all dimension of reform describes by Peter all at once. The idea of the market has been
central in Indonesian government since several decades ago, and the government still
comitted to apply different measures (also imposed international donors). And now, the
participatory style of reform being implemented. And it simply does not work. It seems
that the difficulty in developing participatory style in Indonesian government was
hampered because in the meantime the government was not prepared to deal with the new
management and mechanism of decision making contrary with the existing system. The
process and method of power sharing or that of a new role by the government in the
market style government, have not clearly defined.
Peter’s chapter on “Administrative Reform in Developing and Transitional
Governments” clearly shows the core challenges now being faced by developing
countries and the potent forms of governance to be implemented in the future.
Reference:
Indonesian Partnership on Local Governance Initiative – IPGI (2001). “Mendorong
Demokratisasi di Tingkat Lokal”. IPGI Bandung.
Sumarto, H. Sj. (2003). “Inovasi, Partisipasi dan Good Governance: 20 Prakarsa
Inovative di Indonesia” , Yayasan Obor, Jakarta.
Peters, B. G. (2001). “The Future of Governing”. The University Press of Kansas, USA