Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ETHICS
COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY
__________________________________________________________________
SELF-INSTRUCTIONAL MODULE
COURSE DETAILS
Program Title: Bachelor of Science in Computer Technology
Course Schedule:
Course Title: ETHICS
Credit Units: 3
Instructor: Dorcas C. Revillas
Email Add: revillas.snmmsi@gmail.com
Submitted to: Dr. Robert B. Pabillaran
Name of Student
REVILLAS, D 1
2
To aid in your learning of those lessons aforementioned, this module contains lessons
within a chapter. Each lesson must be accomplished weekly and is further divided into
parts, as follows:
1. Learning Compass This portion orients you with the learning outcomes for the
learning unit.
2. Overview This part provides you with a glimpse of the upcoming lesson as a
jumpstart of your learning journey
3. Let’s Begin! After the identification of learning outcomes and overview for every
lesson, you will be given a task that leads you to the key concepts to be discussed
in that unit.
4. We’re On Our Way! The activity will be followed by guide questions that lead you
to the concepts covered by the lesson. Here, you will analyze what you have
done.
5. Let’s Pore Over! Key concepts and issues of the main lesson are discussed
thoroughly in this section of the lesson that you need to read and reflect through
and through. In addition, along your reading journey you will be provided with
Stop-off Exercises as learning practices for you to answer shortly before going
completely of the rest.
6. How Far Have We Gone? To check whether the given learning outcomes are met,
you are given another task to assess the extent of understanding.
7. Walk the Extra Mile! Every unit is ended with suggested activities for the enrichment
of learning and further application of what has been learned.
This module also includes a Chapter Reflection at the end of every chapter to jot down
your thoughts by answering self-introspective questions. Rubrics are also found in this
module’s Appendices for your reference in making your outputs. Just follow the notes
below each exercise and activity for guidance. Lastly, a Course Feedback is provided at
the end of this module for you to share your evaluative feedback of this module. This part
will be our basis for improvement for future revision.
ETHICS REVILLAS, D
3
MODULE OVERVIEW
This Module provides a brief introduction to the concepts of integrity and ethics.
It is designed to be used by lecturers who wish to provide their students with
conceptual clarity and expose them to ethical dilemmas and ethical decision-
making. The concept of integrity has been added to broaden the focus from the
more traditional field of ethics. Combined, the concepts of integrity and ethics
provide a more comprehensive perspective - they allow us to move beyond
discussions about the difference between right and wrong in order to focus on
relationships and behavior as well.
Course Description
The course discusses the context and principles of ethical behavior in modern
society, at the level of the person, society, and interaction with the environment
and other shared resources. The course also teaches students to make moral
decisions by using dominant moral frameworks and by applying reasoning to
analyze and moral dilemma (1.1.1). Morality pertains to the standards of right and
wrong that an individual originally picks up from the community (1.1.1). The
discussion ethics and moral would include cognates such as ethical, unethical,
moral, and immoral and morality and helps the students see the application of
ethical behavior and moral decision-making and strategies that can develop
critical and creative thinking (3.3.2). At the end of the course, the students will
gain more knowledge on ethical behavior and moral decision-making, and
become more systematic and thoughtful critical thinkers about ourselves, our
community and country (8.8.3).
ETHICS REVILLAS, D
4
Values
❖ Takes responsibility for knowing our
morals and values and learn how to
apply these in our daily activities in
life.
ETHICS REVILLAS, D
5
LESSON 1
FUNDAMENTALS OF ETHICS
In either instance, there is a need for a person to confront his or her situation and
to make sense of one’s life against the odds. To do this, ethics suggests that
besides action, one needs something that can make his or her engagement with
life more meaningful and understandable. This other component is called
THEORY. However, it is often difficult, if not possible, to distinguish action from
theory.
ETHICS REVILLAS, D
6
Personality Test: Quick questions that will assess your level of Self-
understanding and Confidence. Please (/) the circle for your answer.
3. I enjoy socializing
O Yes O No
ETHICS REVILLAS, D
7
Let’s Begin!
Greece is traditionally considered the birthplace of philosophy. The early Greek thinkers
realized they needed what more than what poets and storytellers could tell about the
world around them. They began to ponder and study the processes of nature – the
coming and passing away of life, the changing seasons, the movement of the stars, the
rising and ebbing of the sea tide-solely in their own terms, without appealing to their
pronouncements of oracles or narrations of the whims of the Olympus gods. These early
Greek thinkers believed it was possible to view nature this way, commencing their search
for the primary substance underlying the manifestations of cosmic change. Hence, these
Greek wise men were also recognized as the” first natural scientist “because of their
efforts to understand the inner workings of nature through theoretical experiments.
Anaximander, a students of Thales, said this substance was something unidentifiable and
called it apeiron. For anaximenes, a student of anaximander, it was air.
Anaxagora, another Greek philosopher, on the other hand, traced all natural
movements to the ordering power of a cosmic mind or nous. They are the best example
of human’s unquenchable desire to know.
ETHICS REVILLAS, D
8
Socrates taught Plato about the difficulty of coming to a knowledge of the truth. This
difficulty, however, did not mean impossibility. He instilled this rigorous questioning to his
students and did not shy away from interrogating even the traditional leaders of the
Athens.
ETHICS REVILLAS, D
9
Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle are the three majors’ figures in classical or ancient
philosophy, but they are by no means the only thinkers who considered ethics as a
philosophic engagement.
ETHICS REVILLAS, D
10
WHAT IS ETHICS?
What do people think about when they think ethically? What is the experience on which
ethical reflecton is grounded? It developed from the reality that when people act, they
do not merely need to know the best way to realized something but there are times when
they need to act in a way that they realizes the good. And the good does not always
mean the easiest or the most expedient way. Ethical norms and the question of good
and evil arise when people need to act as free persons. Actions only require ethical
reflection when they are free acts that involves a person’s desire to realize the good.
ETHICS REVILLAS, D
11
Thus, ethics has something to do with realizing the fullest potential as free persons acting
in the world and doing right for others. It is not about being efficient or achieving goals.
It is about realizing what people intuit to be the good, Human being beings intuit that life
is not just about existing or survival, and human action are not just expediency. Somehow,
human beings sense that there is a thing they call the good which they are bound to
realize to genuinely be human and to build a better societies.
2. Empathy: being able to understand the others’ emotions and feelings. This is
possible only when we are aware of our own. Identifying our emotions can help
establish better control over our actions and words. It assumes extreme relevance
in leading a successful life.
3. Restraint: yes, you heard that right. Enjoy your life as much as you can, but not
at the expense of another's privacy or freedom. Remember the saying, “Your
freedom ends where the other's nose begins.”
Unethical Ethical
You want to buy a nice shirt. You want to buy a nice shirt.
You go to a store. You pick a shirt, You go to a store. You pick a shirt,
have a trial in the trial room. have a trial in the trial room.
You do not like the shirt. You do not like the shirt.
You leave the shirt on the floor, You carry the shirt with you gently,
crumpled. return it either in the place allotted
or hand it over to the staff there.
You walk out, looking for other shirts. You walk out, looking for other shirts.
Treat that shirt you do not want to buy the same way
you would treat the one you would buy
ETHICS REVILLAS, D
12
ACTIVITY # 1
Name: ________________________________ Date: ______________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
3. How would you describe the close connection between philosophy and ethics?
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
4. Is it possible for person to be moral but not ethical or ethical but not moral? (10
points)
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
ETHICS REVILLAS, D
13
9. Your plane has crushed into a deserted island and you have five minutes before
the plane’s oil causes a massive explosion. You have the choice of saving a
pregnant woman and an elderly man. Who would you safe first? Why?
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
10. A car crashed and rolled over the man who was walking down the street. It also
hit another car and pushed it across to the edge of a bridge. This car is carrying
three children. The man who by the car requires medical attention immediately
but the children are at risk of falling off the edge. Who would you safe first? Why?
Explain your answer.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
11. Your country’s two religious groups are fighting for land. The condition worsened
to a war and your family are at risk. Due to cultural reasons, you are seen as the
head of the family and must decide on the behalf of everyone. Would you take
the risk and travel by boat to another country illegally? Circle the letter of your
choice.
a. Yes, if there is greater chance for the family’s safety.
b. No, unless all family members make their own decision
c. Maybe, depends on how bad the situation is
12. IF you were the lead astronaut and an asteroid (which is predicted to be so big, it
would destroy earth) was coming towards earth and the quickest way you would
stop would be to fly your space shuttle into the asteroid, killing you and your
workmate. Would you do it?
a. Definitely
b. No, Unless both individuals agree
c. Depends if this was the only solution
Explain your answer of choice
_________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
ETHICS REVILLAS, D
14
• Honesty
There is no more fundamental ethical value than honesty. We associate honesty
with people of honor, and we admire and trust those who are honest. Honesty in
communications is about intent to convey the truth as best we know it and to
avoid communicating in a way likely to mislead or deceive
Honesty in conduct ---prohibits stealing, cheating, fraud, and trickery. Cheating is not
only dishonest but takes advantage of those who are not cheating. It’s a violation of trust
and fairness
ETHICS REVILLAS, D
15
Integrity
There are no differences in the way an ethical person makes decisions from situation to situation -
no difference in the way they act at work and at home, in public and alone.
The person of integrity takes time for self-reflection so that the events, crises and the necessities of
the day do not determine the course of their moral life. They stay in control.
Reliability
When we make promises or commitments to people our ethical duties go beyond legal
obligations. The ethical dimension of promise-keeping imposes the responsibility of making all
reasonable efforts to fulfill our commitments. It is also important to:
Avoid unwise commitments — before making a promise consider carefully whether you are willing
and likely to keep it. Think about unknown or future events that could make it difficult, undesirable
or impossible to keep your commitment. Sometimes, all we can do is promise to do our best.
Avoid unclear commitments — since others will expect you to live up to what they think you have
promised to do, be sure that, when you make a promise, the other person understands what you
are committing to do.
Loyalty
Loyalty is about promoting and protecting the interests of certain people, organizations or
affiliations. Some relationships — husband-wife, employer-employee, citizen-country — create an
expectation of loyalty.
Prioritizing Loyalties. Because so many individuals and groups make loyalty claims on us, it is often
impossible to honor them all simultaneously. Consequently, we must rank our loyalty obligations in
some rational fashion. In our personal lives, for example, it’s perfectly reasonable, and ethical, to
look out for the interests of our children, parents and spouses even if we have to subordinate our
obligations to other children, neighbors, or co-workers in doing so.
Avoiding Conflicting Interests. Employees and public servants have an additional responsibility to
make all professional decisions on merit not personal interests. Their goal is to maintain the trust of
the public.
2. RESPECT
Respect is about honoring the essential worth and
dignity of all people, including oneself. We are
morally obligated to treat everyone with respect,
regardless of who they are and what they have
done. We have a responsibility to be the best we can
be in all situations, even when dealing with
unpleasant people.
ETHICS REVILLAS, D
16
Civility, Courtesy and Decency - A respectful person is a good listener. The respectful person
treats others with consideration, conforming to accepted notions of taste and propriety, and
doesn’t resort to intimidation, coercion or violence except in extraordinary and limited
situations to teach discipline, maintain order or achieve social justice.
Tolerance - An ethical person accepts individual differences and beliefs and judge others only
on their character.
3. RESPONSIBILITY
Life is full of choices. Being responsible means being in charge of our choices and therefore our
lives. It means being accountable for what we do and who we are. It also means recognizing
that what we do, and what we don’t do, matters.
Accountability. An accountable person is not a victim and doesn’t shift blame or claim credit for
the work of others.
Pursuit of Excellence. The pursuit of excellence has an ethical dimension when others rely upon
our knowledge, ability or willingness to perform tasks safely and effectively.
Perseverance. Responsible people finish what they start, overcoming rather than surrendering to
obstacles and excuses.
Continuous Improvement. Responsible people look for ways to do their work better.
Self-Restraint. Responsible people exercise self-control, restraining passions and appetites (such
as lust, hatred, gluttony, greed and fear). They delay gratification if necessary and never feel it’s
necessary to "win at any cost
4. FAIRNESS
Fairness is a tricky concept. Disagreeing parties tend to maintain that there is only one fair position
- their own. But while some situations and decisions are clearly unfair, fairness usually refers to a
range of morally justifiable outcomes rather than discovery of one fair answer.
Process a fair person uses open and unbiased processes for gathering and evaluating information
necessary to make decisions. Fair people do not wait for the truth to come to them; they seek out
relevant information and conflicting perspectives before making important decisions.
5. CARING
Caring is the heart of ethics. It is scarcely possible to be truly ethical and not
genuinely concerned with the welfare others. That is because ethics is ultimately
about our responsibilities toward other people.
Sometimes we must hurt those we care for and some decisions, while quite ethical, do
cause pain. But one should consciously cause no more harm than is reasonably
necessary.
6. CITIZENSHIP
ETHICS REVILLAS, D
17
The concept of citizenship includes how we ought to behave as part of a community. The
good citizen knows the laws and obeys them - but they also volunteer and stay informed on
the issues of the day. Citizens do more than their "fair" share to make society work, now and
for future generations. Citizenship can have many expressions, such as conserving resources,
recycling, using public transportation and cleaning up litter.
MORALS
Morals are the prevailing standards of behavior that enable people to live cooperatively in
groups. Moral refers to what societies sanction as right and acceptable.
Most people tend to act morally and follow societal guidelines. Morality often requires that people
sacrifice their own short-term interests for the benefit of society. People or entities that are
indifferent to right and wrong are considered amoral, while those who do evil acts are considered
immoral.
While some moral principles seem to transcend time and culture, such as fairness, generally
speaking, morality is not fixed. Morality describes the particular values of a specific group at a
specific point in time. Historically, morality has been closely connected to religious traditions, but
today its significance is equally important to the secular world. For example, businesses and
government agencies have codes of ethics that employees are expected to follow.
Some philosophers make a distinction between morals and ethics. But many people use the terms
morals and ethics interchangeably when talking about personal beliefs, actions, or principles. For
example, it’s common to say, “My morals prevent me from cheating.” It’s also common to use
ethics in this sentence instead.
So, morals are the principles that guide individual conduct within society. And, while morals may
change over time, they remain the standards of behavior that we use to judge right and wrong.
Moral Reasoning
Moral reasoning applies critical analysis to specific events to determine what is right or wrong, and
what people ought to do in a particular situation. Both philosophers and psychologists study moral
reasoning.
How we make day-to-day decisions like “What should I wear?” is similar to how we make moral
decisions like “Should I lie or tell the truth?” The brain processes both in generally the same way.
Moral reasoning typically applies logic and moral theories, such as deontology or utilitarianism, to
specific situations or dilemmas. However, people are not especially good at moral reasoning.
Indeed, the term moral dumbfounding describes the fact that people often reach strong moral
conclusions that they cannot logically defend.
In fact, evidence shows that the moral principle or theory a person chooses to apply is often,
ironically, based on their emotions, not on logic. Their choice is usually influenced by internal biases
or outside pressures, such as the self-serving bias or the desire to conform.
So, while we likely believe we approach ethical dilemmas logically and rationally, the truth is our
moral reasoning is usually influenced by intuitive, emotional reactions.
ETHICS REVILLAS, D
18
We are pleased when others compliment us for a job well done. We get angry when we are
accused of wrongdoing we did not do. We become afraid when we are threatened by someone,
and we feel anguish hand despair in moments of seemingly insurmountable hardships. Most of the
time, we are based on how we feel. We seek food when we are hungry and we wish for
companionship when we are lonely. However, unlike animals that are instinctively programmed
to act in accordance with how they feel, we have the capacity to examine a situation before
proceeding to act with respect to how we feel. In other words, although feelings provide us with
an initial reckoning of a situation, they should not be the sole basis for our motives and actions.
Feelings without reasons are blind. Reasons and feelings must be constructively complement each
other whenever we are making choices. When feelings such as anger, jealousy, and shame are
out of control, hence, without the proper guidance of reason, one’s moral capacities become
short-sighted and limited. Reasons puts these emotions in their proper places seeking not to
discredit their validity but calibrating them in such a way they do not become the primary motive
in making moral decisions.
2. Clarify goals. It is also necessary to clarify your short-term and long –terms aims. If you, for
example, are seeking retribution for harm caused by another person. You have to think
about the long-term consequence of revenge on your character in the long run.
3. Determine fact. Make sure you gather enough information before you make a choice. An
intelligent choice is one that is supported by verified facts. You must first make sure that
what you know is enough to merit action. Without verifying facts, you may regret your
choice in the future once various aspects of the situation came to light. Never make a
choice on the basis of hearsay. Make sure your sources are credible and have integrity.
4. Develop options. Once you are clear in terms of your goals and facts, try to come up with
alternative options to exhaust all possible courses of actions. Clear your mind and try to
think of other creative ways of clarifying your motives and implementing your actions with
the least ethical compromise
5. Consider consequences. Filter your choices and separate the ethical and unethical
choices bearing mind both your motives and the potential consequences of your action.
A decision turns something in your mind into reality. Make sure you do not regret the
decision you have conferred reality upon.
6. Choose. Make a decision. If the choice is hard to make, try consulting others who may
have knowledge or experience of your situation.
7. Monitor and modify. Monitor what happens after your decision and have enough humility
to modify your action or behavior as necessary.
Moral courage is the result of a morally developed will. It is the capacity to initiate and sustain your
resolve whenever you are certain of doing the good. It is a kind of virtue that enables one to be
ethical not just in thought but, but more importantly, in deed.
Human beings as doers of moral acts are responsible not only for what they do but for the persons
they grow into through their moral acts. Human acts are relevant to the kind of person one
becomes.
ETHICS REVILLAS, D
19
CONCLUSION
Ethics, the word makes me think of unscrupulous businessman and the phrase 'good work
ethic'. Both of which seems to imply what society thinks is good, just or fair and if you don't
abide by what's considered good, society has a 'right' to say that you are wrong and you
can't really debate against it if you want to be part of that society.
Morals, the word makes me think that the lack of it makes one ashamed to face one's
family, and are more pertaining to how one conducts one's personal life. Which implies
that it's fine to have different 'morals' than others if you really don't care what others think
about it since it's your own personal compass.
Values is something innate within you, what you believe to be true and represents your
conviction in life and how you approach it. It's your 'procedure and checklists' by which
you follow to make your everyday decisions.
Activity # 2
Name: _________________________________ Date: _______________
Philosophy. ( 7-9)
________________________8.
________________________9.
feelings.
________________________12. is the heart of ethics.
our lives.
ETHICS REVILLAS, D
20
Unethical Ethical
B. KIND OF VALUATION
Often primary values are strong and secondary values are suitable for changes. ... Values tend to
influence attitudes and behavior and these types include ethical/moral values,
doctrinal/ideological (religious, political) values, social values, and aesthetic values.
Values are standards or ideals with which we evaluate actions, people, things, or situations.
Beauty, honesty, justice, peace, generosity are all examples of values that many people endorse.
In thinking about values it is useful to distinguish them into three kinds:
• Moral values: values that help determine what is morally right or wrong, e.g.
freedom, fairness, equality, etc, well-being. Those which are used to evaluate
social institutions are sometimes also known as political values.
SOURCES OF AUTHORITY
Meaning of Authority
ETHICS REVILLAS, D
21
• The power or right to give orders, make decisions, and enforce obedience
Example:
“He had absolute authority over his subordinates
• The act to act in a specified way, delegated form one person or organization to
another.
Example.
“ Military officers have the right to arrest drug Traffickers”
1. LAW:
Why ethics and law are not the same thing?
Ethical behavior is not always best defined within the confines of the law.
Ethics and the law are not identical. Typically, the law tells us what we are prohibited
from doing and what we are required to do. It is said that the law sets minimum standards
of behavior while ethics sets maximum standards.
This seems to be changing as the law tries to impose broader obligations in relation to
business and corporate activity, such as with directors’ duties and best interest
obligations for financial advice. Yet legal duties and ethical duties still do not always
correspond.
In other instances, what has long been an acceptable thing to do may have been made
illegal in an effort to change cultural practices that disadvantage or endanger certain
ETHICS REVILLAS, D
22
groups. In India, seeking, giving or accepting a dowry is now illegal, and child marriage
has been outlawed in many jurisdictions.
A key issue to consider in relation to ethics and the law is whether the law is adequate as
a guide for our personal and professional lives.
"The law sets minimum standards of behavior while ethics sets maximum
standards."
Ethics provides us with guides on what is the right thing to do in all aspects of life, while
the law generally provides more specific rules so that societies and their institutions can
be maintained. Ethics engages our thinking and also our feelings, including those of
disgust and guilt.
The law does not tell us what to do in relation to many of the dilemmas and decisions we
have to make in life. While we think obeying the law is an important basis for role models
in our life, we consider other traits such as benevolence and empathy as more important
in characterizing someone as a good person.
Doing what you have the right to do – as in doing something that is not illegal – is not
always identical to doing what is right. That goes for both natural and legal “persons”.
We are becoming increasingly intolerant of businesses that are not doing anything
against the letter of the law, but against its spirit.
Laws are created by different people at different levels and they have their basis in
politics and governmental control and thus they can be influenced by the will of the rulers
and thus they can differentiate from time to time and also over the different regimes
where at one part and/or one point something might be held true but at someplace else
that may not be the law of the land.
Ethics are influenced more by the individuals or the group of individuals and amongst
them what is considered right or wrong and generally, these two terms law and ethics
might seem the same to some but are different from each other.
POINTS OF DISCUSSION
ETHICS REVILLAS, D
23
______1. Characteristics such as loyalty, honesty, respect and sensitivity are related
to which of the following
_______5. You are at a business luncheon, who should pay the bill?
_______6. If your co- worker told you something that was sensitive, which one of the
following should a professional person practice?
a. Discretion
b. performance standard
c. Job objectives
d. Confidentiality
_______7. The power or right to give orders, make decisions, and enforce obedience.
_______9. Is about honoring the essential worth and dignity of all people, including
oneself.
a. Aesthetic values
b. Personal Value
c. Cultural Value
d. Moral Values
ETHICS REVILLAS, D
24
To say that ethics add religion in the Philippine context have a tightly-knit relationship is
an understatement. It is not difficult to see the weight of religion in various ethical issues
such as in the current debates surrounding highly controversial topics such as
reproductive health, the teaching of sex education in schools, same-sex marriage, and
divorce. They usually ethics as an extension of religion, hence the common thinking that
anything against religion is automatically ethical.
Figure 1 Islamic dress code requires the wearing of hijab and niaab
There is really nothing fundamentally wrong with equating ethics and religion. Hindu
society like India ad various Islamic countries consider the close union of ethics and
religion as the very foundation from which people derive their identities as well as the
vitality and stability of their way of life. India, for example, is home to multiple cultures all
claiming to have originated from some deities or archaic religious figures. Life in India
revolves around customary ritual practices and the performance of religious laws, which
govern day-to-day activities. In fact, places, ordinary objects, or other life forms in India
are marked with religious significance. That ethics may be divorced from religion in a
place like India is unimaginable if not next to impossible. The same can be said of Islamic
countries where religious traditions is as deeply rooted as in India. Any person with a
relative working in the Middle East can testify to the dominant influence of Islam on
Arabian customs, government policies, management systems, and even household
practices.
Most Arab countries impose Islamic customs on all individuals in their territories whether
or not one is a Muslim. Christians, for examples, are prohibited from carrying a Bible,
Crucifix, or any Christian religious objects. Clothing style and guidelines for social
interactions among members of the opposite sex are also strictly observed.
Noncompliance with these ordinances is not treated as ordinary infractions of the law
but an affront to the Islamic religion that is meted with severe penalty.
The tight union of ethics and ethics appears to be universal feature present not only in
Christian countries such as the Philippines but also in other societies with rich and deeply
rooted religious traditions.
ETHICS REVILLAS, D
25
Figure 2: Malala Yousafzai s a Pakistani activist for female education and the youngest
Nobel Prize laureate.
Extremism is defined as the “belief and support for ideas that are very far from what
most people consider correct or reasonable”.
Malala Yousafzai is a native of Pakistan, in a district under the religious and political
control of the Taliban. Taliban is a religious sect within the Islamic religion that upholds
and enforces excessively rigid interpretation of Islamic laws. Among other things, the
Taliban prohibits listening to music, watching movies and television, clapping while
watching a games, and even engaging in such innocent activity a kite-flying activities.
Even at a young age, Malala had been vocal against Taliban’s restraint on women’s
education. Not only did she go out in public to protest against it, she even went to school
in defiance of the strict Taliban rule. Malala was fierce and passionate advocate of
children and women’s right and the Taliban was aware of these. On October 9,2012, on
her way home from school, a man walked to her and ask her if she was Malala. After
knowing who she was, the man fired a gun to her. She was shot in the head three times.
ETHICS REVILLAS, D
26
Ethical Reasoning is reasoning about right and wrong human conduct. It requires students to be
able to assess their own ethical values and the social context of problems, recognize ethical issues
in a variety of settings, think about how different ethical perspectives might be applied to ethical
dilemmas, and consider the ramifications of alternative actions. Students’ ethical self-identity
evolves as they practice ethical decision-making skills and learn how to describe and analyze
positions on ethical issues.
Ethical Self- Analyzes both core Analyzes both States both States either Does not
Awareness beliefs and the core beliefs core beliefs their core meet
origins of the core and the origins and the beliefs or benchmark
beliefs with greater
of the core origins of the articulates level
depth and clarity
belief core beliefs. the origins performance
of the core .
beliefs but
not both.
Ethical Issue Recognizes ethical Recognizes Recognizes Recognizes Does not
Recognition issues when ethical issues basic and basic and meet
presented in a when issues obvious obvious benchmark
complex, are presented ethical issues ethical level
multilayered (gray) in a complex, and grasps issues but performance
context AND multilayered (incompletely fails to grasp .
recognizes (gray) context ) the complexity
connections/betw OR grasps complexities or
een among the connections or connections
issues between/amo connections .
ng the issues. between/am
ong the
issues.
Application Independently Independently Independentl Applies Does not
of Ethical applies ethical applies ethical y applies ethical meet
Perspectives/ perspectives/conc perspectives/c ethical perspectives benchmark
Concepts epts to an ethical oncepts to an perspectives/ /concepts level
question, ethical concepts to to an performance
accurately, and question, an ethical ethical .
considers full accurately, question but question
implications of the but does not the with
application. consider the application is support.
specific inaccurate
implications of
the application
Evaluation of States and States and States an States an Does not
Different defends an ethical defends an ethical ethical meet
Ethical position against ethical position position and position but benchmark
Perspectives/ the objections to, against the the cannot level
Concepts assumptions and objections to, objections to, state the performance
implications of assumptions assumptions objections .
different ethical and and to and
perspectives/conc implications of implications assumptions
epts adequately different of different and
and effectively. ethical ethical limitations of
perspectives/c perspectives/ the different
oncepts concepts. perspectives
adequately /concepts.
ETHICS REVILLAS, D