Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Course Description:
This course is designed for College students who are taking up fundamental principles of ethics (NGEC). It deals with the principles of ethical behavior in modern society at the level of
the person, and in interaction with the environment and other shared resources (CMO 20 s 2013). By Ethics we mean that branch of philosophy that examines the moral standards of an
individual or society. It deals with what is right or wrong conduct, good and evil, and the values embedded, fostered or pursued in the act. This course seeks to help the students acquire a
fundamental grasp of major ethical theories and give them opportunity to address contemporary moral issues including environmental ethical issues. This endeavor hopes to equip students
with fundamental moral values as men and women for others living in a community of persons who are in harmony with both human and non-human worlds. It is hoped that this course will
form them as men and women of conscience, competent, compassionate and committed in the pursuit of a profound and meaningful co-existence with both human and non-human worlds.
This course aims to develop students' capacities for ethical self-understanding and ethical reasoning on various ethical issues such as personal, societal and environmental issues. This
will allow students to foster harmonious interaction with themselves, the society, and the environment for a more peaceful world.
This course will employ a case-based learning approach. This approach will start what they already know as they will be exposed to different cases, specifically ethico-moral issues or
problems. Through pre-formulated guide questions, the student’s initial analysis of the problem or issue at hand will yield a problem statement that will serve as a starting point for the
investigation. It will be in this phase that the students will be analyzing the problem into components, discussing implications, entertaining possible explanations or solutions, and developing
working hypotheses. Finally, the students will have to support their possible solutions or working hypotheses by validating it through the use of ethical theories and principles for validity,
reliability and usefulness in applying to the problem.
The CBL approach will basically make use of group activity discussions and presentation. Moreover, this course will also have a reflective writing component. The students will be asked
to think about the issues, problems and theories that will be studied and express their thoughts and feelings through writing reflection papers. It is important for that the moral framework is
developed when there is the time to discuss and reflect upon it, rather than waiting until they are faced with the tough choices.
a. Recognize the need for and demonstrate the ability for lifelong learning
b. Identify multi-perspectives and interrelations among texts and contexts
c. Apply analytical and interpretive skills in the study of texts d. Discuss and/or create artistic forms
e. Demonstrate research skills specific to the sub-disciplines in the humanities
f. Use appropriate theories and methodologies critically and creatively
g. Appraise the role of humanistic education in the formation of the human being and society
Course Learning Outcomes:
A. KNOWLEDGE
1. Discuss the various ethical theories.
2. Identify current ethical issues in all levels: local, national, and global.
3. Examine how the different ethical theories influence one’s perspectives on current issues.
4. Analyze the commonality of the different ethical principles.
B. SKILLS
1. Apply the fundamental ethical principles when making decisions.
2. Analyze and evaluate the ethical principles in moral deliberation and discernment.
3. Acquire the habit of formulating and defending one’s own stance on critical issues,
4. Use the Framework for Moral Decision making.
C. ATTITUDE
1. Cultivate in oneself a deep sense of moral-worth.
2. Manifest strong and sound Moral Reasoning (Academic excellence)
the value of moral reflection and critical thinking for working out contemporary moral issues.
3. Show intellectual openness to other people’s views.
4. Exhibit basic awareness of the importance of moral reflection and its profound
meaning and implication in one’s pursuit to live a life of excellence in spirit
as the ideal of being men and women for others.
Assumptions
Students taking up the ETHICS course have taken the UNDSELF and PHIHUM Prerequisites, thus are already equipped with and have a basic understanding of the kept principles presented in
the course content though the scaffold nature of all three courses. ETHICS provides the opportunity to put into practice the principles covered though case based inductive approaches
facilitated by the instructors. the content serves as refreshers to help contextualize the topics
3. Express insight on the significance of philosophical discourse in the midst of current social and political issues/situations. P P P I I P P
4. Cultivate a deep sense of self-worth by reflecting on the ideas of philosophers about the value and meaning of human life and the
D P D I I D D
proper place of persons in society, nature, and the world in general.
5. Manifest the values of magis and cura personalis through profound social engagement D D D I I D D
LEARNING INTENDED CROSS-LINKED
Week Assessment Learning Activities References
CONTENT LEARNING OUTCOME CONCEPTS/VALUES
Week 1 ● Get to know each Magis: Pre-Lectio PHIHUM Course Outline
INTRODUCTION other by sharing facts 1.2. Creative Thinker ●Submit duly signed ● Fill up the Expresso
TO THE COURSE and fiction about their 1.2.a. Generate new Individual Learning ● Review: ● Student Handbook
lives. knowledge and/or big ideas. contract ● Course Outline and ● Course Outline
1. Personal ● Provide a list of 1.1.a. Proactive (instead of Policies ● Learning Contract
Introduction expectations on the Reactive) ●Submit Accomplished ● Student Handbook
content the Cura Personalis: Expresso Worksheet ● Learning Contract
2. Course Syllabus 2.1. Active listening
participants would Learning Episode
3. Teacher’s find most useful in the 2.1.a. Receive and respect ●CISS GTKY: Expresso
class by creating a set others’ thoughts, ideas and Conference Session for:
Students
of agreements that set opinions with open mind and ● GTKY Activity
expectations
forth the ground rules heart. ● Clarification of
4. Class Policies for creating a 2.1. Empathy course
and Guidelines successful learning 2.1. Nurturing skills preliminaries
environment and Animo: Passionate towards ● Course Outline and
5. Academic achieving their work. Requirements
Requirements expectations. 3.1.a Set the goals or objectives ● Learning Contract
● Show a dialogical for the programs and activities. ● Orientation for the
6. Student 3.2 Strong sense of next week’s
attitude in meeting up
Handbook responsibility. expected outputs
expectations by Discernment:
REVIEW:IPP- signing a learning 4.1 Reflective attitude
CERAE contract. 4.3 Contemplative in Action
Companionship: Able to live
in harmony with others
6.1 Collaboration skills
Week 2 INTRODUCTION: Accomplish the Pre-Lectio ● Reyes, R.C (1989).
● Discuss the definition Magis: Case-Based ● Read and Annotate Ground and Norm
The Ethical and nature of Morality Worksheet on the Preliminary of Morality.
1.2. Creative Thinker
Dimension of by comparing and 1.2.a. Generate new Case: First Dy of Notions Quezon City:
contrasting Ethics and knowledge and/or big Class for the Ateneo de Manila
Human Existence
Morality insights on Ethics Learning Episode University Press
ideas
1. Preliminary and Morality. ● Work on the case: pages 1-6.
Animo:
Notions ● Apply the general First day of Class’
Phases of the Case- 3.2.Systems thinking ● Accomplish Course vignette through a ● Supplementary
2. Case-Based Based Learning 3.2.a Synthesize situations Insight Summary buzz group Notes: Ethics:
Analysis: Approach by working in a holistic perspective. Sheet#1 discussion and Introduction and
Methodology: on the first Day case Discernment: (individual) plenary Preliminary Notion
General Phases of vignette. 4.1. Reflection, meditation presentation.
the Case-Based and contemplative skills ● Worksheet on the ● Synthesis and ● “A Good
Learning ● Clarify and examine case: First Day of plenary lecture Life”Michael Tan,
Approach. the factors Class (group) ● Orientation for the PINOY KASI
contributing to the next week’s PDI, 9-8-06
evolution of ethics Activity on
Description on ● A Framework for
and the foundations
Moral Dimension Thinking Ethically
of ethics as a separate This framework for
philosophical thinking ethically is
discipline by the product of
accomplishing the dialogue and
course insight debate at the
summary sheet. Markkula Center
● Recognize the for Applied Ethics
significance of the at Santa Clara
course in the practice University. Primary
of your chosen contributors
include Manuel
course/profession.
Velasquez, Dennis
Moberg, Michael J.
Meyer, Thomas
Shanks, Margaret
R. McLean, David
DeCosse, Claire
André, and Kirk O.
Hanson. It was last
revised in May
2009.
WEEK 5 Conscience Discuss conscience Magis: Pre-Lectio Reyes, R.C. (1989). Ground
as the ground and 1.2. Creative Thinker ● Accomplish Instructions: Click the link and norm of
1.2.a. Generate new Worksheet for provided below. Answer morality. Quezon
norm of morality by
knowledge and/or big ideas assigned Activity the activity provided on the City: Ateneo de
analyzing the ● Accomplish course website. After which,
choices made in the Manila University
Animo: insight Summary connect to at least 2 of
Press pages 91.-
activity. 3.2.Systems thinking Sheet. your classmates and
102
Illustrate the 3.2.a Demonstrate 25 item Quiz identify the numbers you
judgment-event integrative thinking. have the same answer. Chapter 39 Activity: Let
Share during in person Your Conscience Be Your
process of
Discernment: class your answer to the Guide.
conscience in the 4.3 Contemplative in Action question, why do you think (2014.)https://www.smp.or
given activity. 4.1. Reflection, meditation you have the same answer g/dynamicmedia/files
Appreciate personal and contemplative skills. to a particular number. /
experience of Click link for the activity. 845d7eff90db149801b3fa7
conscience in crisis 5141649a6/TX003611-2-
Learninf Episode handout-39b-
by judgment- event ● Think-Pair-Share Let_Your_Conscience_Be_Y
by accomplishing ● Synthesis/Plenary our_Guide.pdf
the course insight Presentation
summary sheet.
Week 7 Thomas Aquinas ● Discuss how St. ● Accomplish the Pre-Lectio https://core.ac.uk/
and the Natural Thomas Aquinas Magis: Case-Based ● Read and download/pdf/
Law argued that nature 1.2. Creative Thinker Worksheet Understand the 148692719.pdf
1.2.a. Generate new knowledge
can be a basis for and/or big ideas ● ( Worksheet on the material on Natural
moral deliberation by Animo: similarities/differen Law Reyes, R.C (1989).
enumerating and 3.2.Systems thinking ces of Natural Law Ground and Norm
clarifying the 3.2.a Synthesize situations in a from other types of of Morality.
holistic perspective.
principles of Natural 3.2.a Demonstrate integrative
law may be Quezon City:
Law. thinking. presented also) Learning-Episode Ateneo de Manila
● Compare and contrast Discernment: ● Accomplish Course ● Group discussion Pages 45-54
natural law from other 4.1.b. Reflect on insights, Insight Summary on cases assigned
types of law realizations, and learning for self Sheet(CISS) ● Synthesis and
enhancement and societal and
mentioned by St. organizational development. plenary lecture
Thomas Aquinas by 4.3 Contemplative in Action ● 25 Item Quiz
applying it in the given ● Orient Students for
case. next week’s
● Articulate and justify activity/schedule
ethical cases using
Natural Law as a basis
for a rational moral
deliberation by
accomplishing the
Course insight
Summary sheet.
Week 15 Applied Ethics: ● Discuss the relevance ● Submit Case-Based Pre-Lectio ● ENCYCLICAL
Environmental of environmental Magis: Worksheet on ● Read and LETTER
Ethics ethics in the encyclical 1.2. Creative Thinker environmental understand the LAUDATO SI’
Laudato Si by 1.2.a. Generate new ethics. material on OF THE HOLY
identifying and knowledge and/or big ideas ● Accomplish Course ‘Laudato si’ FATHER
clarifying the Insight Summary ● Watch Video: FRANCIS
principles stressed by Animo: Sheet. Darwin’s ON CARE FOR OUR
Pope Francis. 3.2.Systems thinking ● 25 Item Quiz Nightmare COMMON HOME
● Compare and contrast 3.2.a Synthesize situations in Learning Session Copyright ©
environmental ethic a holistic perspective. ● Group discussion Dicastero per la
from land ethic by 3.2.a Demonstrate on the Comunicazione -
applying it to the integrative thinking. video/documentar Libreria Editrice
assigned case. y and accomplish Vaticana
● Demonstrate a deeper Discernment: the Case-Based
awareness of 4.1.b. Reflect on insights, Worksheet
contemporary realizations, and learning for ● plenary
environmental or self enhancement and presentation on
ecological issues by societal and organizational video analysis on
applying the moral development. the assigned
principle of Justice, 4.1 Reflective attitude documentary
Peace and Integrity of 4.3 Contemplative in depicting
Creation in Action environmental
understanding and ethics.
evaluating ● Synthesis and
environmental plenary lecture
scenarios especially ● Orient Students for
climate change. next week’s
activity/schedule
F Failed Below 60
4.0 Excellent (28-30 pts) Demonstrates an in-depth and nuanced understanding the concepts discussed with no misconceptions; shows exceptional competence in
explanations by clear elaborations of points, with accurate application and connection to real world experiences. Discussions are able to
challenge existing principles through coherence and clear arguments.
3.5 Superior (27 pts) Demonstrates detailed understanding, with little misconceptions; shows high competence in explanations through clear elaborations and
accurate application and connections to real world experiences, and is able to highlight existing principles through coherence and clear
arguments.
3.0 Above Average (25-26 pts) Demonstrates comprehensive understanding, with minor misconceptions; shows competence in explanations by providing some accurate
application to real world experiences, and is able to highlight existing principles through coherence and clear arguments.
2.5 High Average (23-24 pts) Demonstrates a general understanding of the concept with a few misconceptions, can explain in some detail by anchoring it experiences that
may be related to the principles discussed.
2.0 Average (22 pts) Demonstrates some understanding of the concept, has some misconceptions, can explain in some detail connections and applications to real
world experiences.
1.5 Low Average (20-21 pts) Demonstrates limited understanding; has misconceptions, can explain in some details with inaccuracies. Shows little application to real world
experiences.
1.0 Passed (18-19 pts) Demonstrates low understanding; has many misconceptions; needs help in explaining ideas or has plenty of inconsistencies
F Failed (0-17 pts) Details are unorganized, unrelated or have no relevance to the concepts discussed
Rubrics for Final Output
DESCRIPTORS* INTERPRETATION
4.0 Excellent (28-30 pts) Discussions are able to provide remarkable depth of insight and intelligently challenges existing frames of references and contexts. Discussion and
narratives are organized and structured with significant strong anchoring to real world or personal experiences. Presents clear detailed and nuanced
(written and/or visual) representation(s) of content required, with substantial use of the materials covered in the course (with proper citation and
reference) in the discussions and narratives presented.
3.5 Superior (27 pts) Discussions are able to provide strong insight and would challenges existing frames of references and contexts. Discussion and narratives are organized
and structured with clear anchoring to real world or personal experiences. Presents clear detailed (written and/or visual) representation(s) of content
required, with substantial use of the materials covered in the course (with proper citation and reference) in the discussions and narratives presented.
3.0 Above Average (25-26 Discussions are able to provide comprehensive insight that contextualizes the content appropriately. Discussion and narratives are organized and
pts) structured with some anchoring to real world or personal experiences. Presents clear detailed (written and/or visual) representation(s) of content
required, with clear use of the materials covered in the course (with proper citation and reference) in the discussions and narratives presented.
2.5 High Average (23-24 Discussions presents appropriate insight and contextualizes the content. Discussion and narratives are clear and organized with some anchoring to real
pts) world or personal experiences. Presents detailed (written and/or visual) representation(s) of content required, with use of the materials covered in the
course (with proper citation and reference) in the discussions and narratives presented.
2.0 Average (22 pts) Discussions presents some insight and contextualizes the content. Discussion and narratives are clear and organized with some anchoring to real world
or personal experiences. Presents detailed (written and/or visual) representation(s) of content required, with use of the materials covered in the
course (with proper citation and reference) in the discussions and narratives presented.
1.5 Low Average (20-21 Discussions are coherent and has contextualization; narratives are generally organized with some to real world or personal experiences. Presents
pts) (written and/or visual) representation(s) of content required, with use of the materials covered in the course (with proper citation and reference) in the
discussions and narratives presented.
1.0 Passed (18-19 pts) Discussions are barely coherent with multiple inconsistencies; no concoction to experiences. Presents (written and/or visual) unclear representation(s)
of content required, with little to no use of the materials covered in the course in the discussions and narratives presented.
F Failed (0-17 pts) Discussions are unorganized, unrelated or have no relevance to the concepts discussed.