You are on page 1of 99

Abstract

The flood caused range of destruction in district Chitral Khyber pukhtunkhwa

(KPK) specially the hilly areas like Kalash and Garam-chashma valley.

Thousands of people were deprived from their homes and properties. The

cause behind the flood was the irregular increase in melting of glaciers due to

rise in temperature day by day. The climatic changes that includes rising

temperature and intense rainfall, results in increased frequency of extreme

weather events such as flood and droughts. The researcher conducted a

survey in the Booni valley of district Chitral. The researcher took a sample

size of two hundred (200) Respondents and collected the data on the basis of

interview schedule. The impact of flood on economic activities has been

discussed in a theory “relative deprivation”. This study found that a great

destruction occurred due to the flood in Chitral. Flood has affected the

cultivation process of the area indicated much decline in the production. This

study also revealed that flood very badly affected the irrigation system,

destroyed the crops, irrigated land, livestock, and ruined the houses, blocked

the roads, electricity, washed away buildings and lands. It was hypothesized

that the flood has the great impact on the economic activities of people in

Chitral. The data was significant and supported the hypotheses of the study.
Table of Contents
Chapter No.1 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................9
1.1Statement of the problem........................................................................14
1.2 Objectives...............................................................................................14
1.3Significance of the study.........................................................................15
Chapter No.2 LITERATURE REVIEW..........................................................16
2.1 Natural hazards......................................................................................17
2.2 Global warming a causative factor of flood...........................................17
2.3 Climate change leads to flood................................................................18
2.4 Intense rainfall cause flood....................................................................18
2.5 High summer temperature is major factor of flood................................19
2.6 River outflow leads to flood...................................................................20
2.7 Glacier melting and snow fall main factor of flood...............................20
2.8 Rapid Deforestation leads to flood.........................................................20
2.9Flood influence Economic activities and result in the economic loss....21
2.10 Floods in Pakistan................................................................................22
2.11Floods affect the economic activities....................................................23
2.2 Indicators................................................................................................25
Chapter 3 THEORITICAL FRAMEWORK...................................................27
3.1 Theory of relative deprivation................................................................28
3.2Application of the theory........................................................................28
3.3 propositions............................................................................................31
3.4 Assumptions...........................................................................................31
3.5 Hypothesis..............................................................................................31
3.5. Alternative Hypothesis..........................................................................31
3.5.2 Null Hypothesis...................................................................................31
Chapter No.4 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY..............................................32
4.1 Universe.................................................................................................33
4.2 Target population...................................................................................33
4.3 Sampling frame......................................................................................33
4.5 Sample size............................................................................................33
4.6 Tools for data collection........................................................................34
4.7 Techniques for data collection...............................................................34
4.8 Pretesting................................................................................................34
4.9 Data Analysis.........................................................................................34
4.10 Opportunities and limitations...............................................................35
4.11 Ethical concerns...................................................................................35
Chapter no 5 CONCEPTUALIZATIO AND OPERATIONALIZATION.....36
4.1 Conceptualization...................................................................................36
4.1.1 Flood:..................................................................................................37
4.1.2 Economic............................................................................................37
4.1.3: Activities............................................................................................38
4.2 Oprationalization....................................................................................39
4.2.1Flood....................................................................................................39
4.2.2 Economic............................................................................................39
4.2.2 Activities.............................................................................................39
Chapter no 6 RESULTS...................................................................................41
6.1 Descriptive analysis...............................................................................42
6.2 Inferential statistics................................................................................79
Chapter no 7 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSSION.....................................90
7.1 Discussion..............................................................................................91
7.2 Conclusion.............................................................................................94
REFERENCES................................................................................................95
List of table

Table 1 Gender of the respondents..................................................................44


Table 2 Age of the respondents.......................................................................45
Table 3f Amily type of the respondents..........................................................46
Table 4 Number of family members of the respondents.................................47
Table 5 Marital status of respondents..............................................................48
Table 6 Monthly family income of the respondents........................................49
Table 7 Academic qualifications of the respondents.......................................50
Table 8 Occupation of the respondents...........................................................51
Table 9 Respondents opinion regarding flood most frequently occur in the
area...................................................................................................................52
Table 10 Respondents opinion regarding flood as disastrous hazard..............53
Table 11Respondents views regarding heavy rainfall a factor of flood..........54
Table 12 Respondents views regarding heavy rainfall a factor of flood.........55
Table 13 Respondents opinion regarding occurrence of flood due to
mountainous structure......................................................................................56
Table 14 Respondents opinion regarding deforestation a cause of flood in the
region...............................................................................................................57
Table 15 Respondents perception regarding flood as a natural phenomenon. 58
Table 16 Respondents perception about flood happens as result of misdeed of
people...............................................................................................................59
Table 17 Respondents opinion regarding flood occurs only in summer season
.........................................................................................................................60
Table 18 Respondents opinion regarding overgrazing is a factor of flood......61
Table 19 Respondents opinion regarding flood affect the cultivation process62
Table 20 Respondents opinion regarding time consumption in rehabilitation of
flood affected land...........................................................................................63
Table 21 Respondents opinion regarding flood affects the irrigation system. 64
Table 22 Respondents opinion regarding flood destroys the crops.................65
Table 23 Respondents opinion regarding flood destroy the fruit trees and
affect the dry fruit business..............................................................................66
Table 24 Respondents opinion regarding flood affected the cultivated..........67
Table 25 Respondents opinion about flood destroyed the livestock in the
village..............................................................................................................68
Table 26 Respondents opinion regarding the breakage of roads disturbs the
economic activities..........................................................................................69
Table 27 Respondents response about the flood ruined the houses of people in
the area.............................................................................................................70
Table 28 Respondents opinion regarding flood affected the government
building............................................................................................................71
Table 29 Respondents opinion regarding business losses are outcomes of
flood in the region............................................................................................72
Table 30 Respondents opinion regarding breakdown of electricity suffer
economic activities during flood.....................................................................73
Table 31Respondents opinion regarding the shutdown of business during
flood causes the economic activities decline...................................................74
Table 32 Respondents opinions about the effect of flood on self employed
business and private job...................................................................................75
Table 33 Respondents opinions about due to flood disruption employees do
not get their salaries.........................................................................................76
Table 34 Respondents opinion regarding flood increases land fertility..........77
Table 35 Respondents opinion regarding most of the money and time spent for
rehabilitation of drinking water supply after flood..........................................78
Table 36 Respondents opinion regarding flood gave advantage to plant and
animals.............................................................................................................79
Table 37 Respondents opinion regarding flood cleans the environment.........80
Chapter No.1

INTRODUCTION

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) stated that global

warming refers to the increasing temperature of earth surface, including land,

water and near surface air.

Over the last decades, the scientist have studied the green house effects, which

is caused by the accumulation of carbon dioxide and other green house gasses,

that leads to global warming and other climatic change over the next century

(Mendelssohn et al. 1994).

Below (2006) defines disaster as a situation or event, which overwhelms local

capacity, necessitate a request to national or international level for external

assistance. Hoyois et al. (2005) study reveals that the economic impact of
disasters includes of direct and indirect affect on the local economy. The

direct affect of disaster consists of damage to infrastructure, crops and

housing. The indirect consequences include the loss of revenue,

unemployment, market destabilization. Natural disasters are divided into two

groups: Hydrometer logical disasters and geophysical disasters. The

hydrometerolgical disasters consist of Landslide, drought, extreme

temperature, floods, and forest fire and windstorm. Geophysical disasters

include earthquakes, Tsunami and volcanic eruption. Mwape (2009) the

frequency of natural disasters has been increasing over the years, causes loss

of life, highly damage the property and destruction of Environment. Each year

the number of people at risk has been increasing and in developing countries

with high poverty level, making them more vulnerable to disasters.

Flood can occur in almost in any river of valley at any time, they are

unpredicTable. Floods are sudden failure of dams and other structures offer

the greatest threat to life (Sturgis 1957). There are six main types of flood.

The coastal flood; Flash flood: River flood, drainage problems, Tsunamis and

Tidal wave. Coastal flood are those occurring along the coast of seas and big

lakes, flash flood occur after the intensive rainfall that leads to sudden raise of

water level and caused threat to lives. The River flood happens due to the flow

of river outside of its regular boundaries. Drainage problem is occurring due

to high rainfall that cannot be controlled by regular drainage system.

Tsunamis are the series of sea waves produced by rapid dislocation of sea
water capable of transmission over large distance and causing a destructive

flow on reaching land. Tidal wave occurs due to the sudden rise of tidal water

caused by atmospheric activities moving rapidly inland from the coast

(Jonkman 2004). Risk is the probability and other physical characteristic of

the hazard. Exposure is the measure of the population or land uses at risk.

Those directly at risk from fluvial flooding are the properties, activities and

people located on flood plains. Those who are beyond the flood plains may

also be affected by the flood indirectly if their activities are linked within the

flood plains (Parker 1978).

Abaya et al. (2009) concludes that floods are the most shocking type of

natural disasters in the world. These cause extraordinary deaths, destruction

and decease, property loss and infrastructures. Flooding has the negative

impact on the developing countries because the lack of disaster management

policies. There is a lack of opportunities and economic resources in the

developing countries. When these countries face disasters, become more

vulnerable. They have no more resources for the future policy or the chronic

condition. They are dependent on the developed countries and get loan for the

development or for the better condition.

Flood causes much destruction in the society. It badly affects the economy; by

destructing the land, crops, infrastructure, ruined the houses and causes big

economic loss. China is the calamitous country. Even an average year, natural
disasters causes 10 millions of deaths, topple down about 3 million houses,

cover more than 50 millions of farmlands and cause a loss of grain output of

20 million tones. The total directs loses usually amount about RMB50. On

average loses due to calamities amount to 2% of the total output each year

much higher than developed countries (Shing 1992).

Mustafa and Wescoat (1997) wrote that Pakistan is underdeveloped country. It

contains large portion of Indus main stem and five major rivers Sutlej, Ravi,

Jhelum, Chenab and Kabul. Each river is cause of flood and challenge for the

Pakistan. In 1947 flood occur; it was the cause of loss of life more than 7000,

and other loss like agriculture, economic, infrastructure and household

damaged due the flood. Some major flood like in 1992 cost the country about

3 percent of the total gross domestic products (GDP). In Pakistan 70 percent

population lives in rural areas and directly or indirectly depends upon

irrigation agriculture. Many villages live near the rivers because they belong

to agriculture. When the level of water increase in the rivers they faced a lot of

damaged. It became very difficult to control the water and cause of

destruction. Rehman and khan (2011) study reveals that Pakistan is exposing

too many natural hazards and the current flood has been causing many losses

to lives and other properties; the Swat valley is no exception to it. The study

revealed that mostly flood occur in these areas during summer season.

According to Pakistan ministry of food, agriculture and live stock 2010 flood

causes much economic losses due to the crop damage which include PKR52
billion to over 80,000 hectares of sugarcane,PKR21.3 billion of rice, PKR22.4

billion of maize, PKR17.3 billion of wheat stock and PKR45 billion to food,

fodder and vegetables. Khyber Pokhtunkhua is also prone to flood because of

its physiographic and climate, a four days wet spell was occurred in the region

of major flowing river in the province. The heavy rainfall caused 2010 flood

in the province.

The floods causes range of destruction in district Chitral Khyber Pukhtunkhaw

(KPK) specially the hilly areas like Kalash and Garam-Chashma valley, and

above thousands of people are deprived from their homes and properties. The

cause behind the flood is the irregular increase in melting of glaciers due to

rise in temperature day by day. Many villages are suffered by the flood like

Green lasht,Reshun, Junalkoch, Avilasht, Sarghuz, Chunj, Arkari, Karim

abad, Lotkoh and Kallash valley (Zahiruddin 2014).

Chitral is the district of northern Pakistan located in the eastern Hindu Kush

range. The population in this mountainous territory is restricted to tributary-

junction fans in the Chitral valley. Closeness to vertical valley slope makes

these fans prone to hydrological hazards, including landslides, floods and

debris flow (Khan et al. 2013).

1.1Statement of the problem

The aim of the study is to identify the impact of flood on the economic

activities of people of Booni valley of district Chitral. The main purpose of the
study is to provide a thorough understanding about the impact of flood on

economic activities of region. The research will provide 1st step to further

studies on this issue.

1.2 Objectives

1. To highlight the major factors of flood in Booni Chitrall.

2. To find out the impact of flood on the economic activities of people

living in Booni Chitral.

3. To find out the relationship between the flood and economic activities

in Booni Chitral.

1.3 Significance of the study

Chitral is the district of Khyber Pukhtunkhwa (KPK) which is surrounded by

mountains covered with snow and glaciers. Due to its mountainous

appearance it is highly exposed to natural hazards. Flood is the mostly

occurring natural hazard in this region and causes a lot of destruction. It badly

affects the economy of the area. No proper studies have been conducted on

this issue because of its isolated location from other areas of Pakistan.

Through this study the researcher will be able to find out the impact of flood

on the area. The study can provide information about the causes, consequence

and even certain policies which have been made globally for controlling flood.

The study also highlights the causes of flood and provides guidelines to

improve the negative impact of the flood and promote the community

mobilization toward the issue. The research also contributes to the body of
literature on impact of flood on economic activities because the present data

are limited.

Chapter No.2

LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Natural hazards

Natural hazards refers to those events which cannot be prevented from

occurring but by taking effective measures the impact can be reduced by

reducing their severity, frequency and possible size. The river bank erosion

are natural processes and are continuous which have badly impact on the

livelihood, destroyed the homes, wiped out cultivable land and reduced the

employment opportunities. Assam is a land of river and river has the strong

threat to human population and property through flood, drought and erosion

and has the social, physical and economic significance. Flood is the most

frequently occurring disastrous natural hazard of Aasam. Every year this area

is adversely affected by the flood and river bank erosion and considers the

biggest cause of loss of property and life in Aasam (Mili, Acharjiee and

Konwar 2013).
2.2 Global warming a causative factor of flood

The study conducted by Jonkman (2004) revealed that the world wide risks of

flooding increasing due to the future development. The main cause is

associated with the global warming, such arise of sea level, intense rainfall

and higher river release increased the degree of flooding in the world. The

impact of flood increased due to the growth of global population, urbanization

in flood prone areas and inadequate flood control policy. The impact of flood

is depending upon the characteristics of the area and the flood itself. The rapid

rising flood can caused more destruction then the small inundation due to

drainage problems. The characteristic of area include the density, magnitude,

warning system, and land use.

2.3 Climate change leads to flood

Opondo (2013) argued that the climatic changes that includes rising

temperature and intense rainfall, results in increased frequency of extreme

weather events such as flood and droughts. The six years with warmest

temperature have recorded last two decades. In sub Saharan Africa the rainfall

variability has been observed with decreases recorded in the Sahel region and

increases in the east and central African region. Within the last quarter century

the climate related disasters like flood and drought have doubled in these

regions. The Sub Saharan countries experiences unexpected adverse weather

patterns.
2.4 Intense rainfall cause flood

Mwape (2009) stated that Zambia has faced adverse flood impacts, the recent

heavy rains experienced by Zambia have resulted into flash flood and water

logging in the valley and varying impact on a number of sectors namely

infrastructure, agriculture, education, health water and sanitation and

habitation. Zambia suffered by random rainfall patterns particularly drought

which caused crop failure in the agricultural seasons. Flood also caused crop

failure in the recent past agricultural season impacted on the critical sector of

the economy. The study made by (Haddad and Teixiera 2013) revealed that

the intense rainfall in the summer causes floods in several parts of the Sao

Pauolo town of Brazil. The flood directly affected the people and the city and

also produced bad impact on the economic sector of the state and the country.

The city household, industrial and commercial activities, public and private

services and the urban transportation system are affected by the flood.

Khan et al. (2000) study revealed that District Charsada of Pakistan is highly

exposed to flood due to which it faces flash flood. The major causes of flood

in this area are heavy rainfall and adverse drain where as the major flood

intensifying factors in this area are the construction of drain boundaries, weir

structures and bridge on the drains. The agricultural sector and physical

infrastructure of the region are highly affected by the flood. Agricultural

activities are the traditional occupation of the area flash flood caused damage
to kharif harvest crop in the region. The strong flood water badly affects the

standing crop and uprooted them. It indirectly affects agricultural activities by

damaging the crop, habitation, livestock and field.

2.5 High summer temperature is major factor of flood

According to the climate change expert there is an increase in magnitude and

frequency of extreme temperature. It has been estimated that in the

atmosphere, warm temperature can hold more water vapor and thus intensify

water cycle which as a result enhances the risk of floods (Rahman and khan

2013).

2.6 River outflow leads to flood

Flood is the common event known throughout the world, with about 72% of

earth is covered with sediments. Mostly floods are occurred by the overflow

of river banks and all continents faced such flooding except Antarctica

(Kozlowski 1984).

2.7 Glacier melting and snow fall main factor of flood

Richardson and Renolds (2000) study revealed that Himalayas are considered

as the most glacierious region of the world where the snow fall and glacier

causes natural hazards. The two main type of glacial hazard are direct hazard

and indirect hazard, the direct hazard caused by the direct action of snow or
ice while indirect hazard result by the consequences of glacial processes and

climate change.

2.8 Rapid Deforestation leads to flood

Rapid and extensive deforestation in upper Amazonia caused the worst flood

in the region (Kozloski 1984).

Flood has become more frequent in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River.

The level of water rose then before. It caused very serious damages; this is

due to the result of human activity in the river basin. There are three aspects

that have caused the flood level to rise. The first and foremost the devastation

of vegetation secondly the land recovery and siltation and the thirdly the

construction of levees (Yin and li 2001).

2.9Flood influence Economic activities and result in the economic loss

According to Haddad and Teixeira(2013) there are three main driving force in

an economic perspective, at first the business have to shut down temporarily

in an area of flood point, affect their gross domestic products (GDP) growth

through interruption in their value chain; secondly it reduce the capital stock

available for the production by damaging economic structure, temporary

infrastructure services disruption puts negatively impact on the potential gross

domestic products (GDP) and thirdly the reconstruction efforts and other
maintenance measures operate in opposite direction, investment oriented

activities also starts after flood.

Pelling, Ozerdem and Barkat (2002) explained that disaster destroys many

type of function and institutions all at once. It bring crisis in the society.

Disasters are the big hindrances in the development of any country. The

countries and districts that are prone to natural hazards the pace of

development is slow because of increased public expenses on disaster

improvement and the declines in economic activities. Disaster proneness may

act as a discouragement to new investors, mainly during reform when

perceptions of hazard risks are keen and the economy is unsTable.

2.10 Floods in Pakistan

Tariq (2013) argued that Floods were the most commonly happening and

destructive natural hazard in the world. Most deaths and economic losses

caused by natural hazards are incurred by the developing countries. Pakistan is

one of the developing countries, where flood occur most frequently and

attempts were made to establish insufficient flood management policy. Flood

is considered as beneficial; flooding in wet lands is considered as

advantageous and assessed in financial term with the consultation of local

expert. The risk of flood can be reduced by changing land use practices that in

turn reduces the exposure. The changes in exposure and vulnerability, land

use may practice deferent degrees of damage. Other options of flood control
are flood zoning, land use replacement, improvement, or complete desertion

of the flood plains. In Pakistan the flood began from July a most disastrous

hazard in a recent decade.

Ali (2013) argued that from 1950 to 2011 Pakistan had experienced 21 major

floods almost 1 flood occurs every 3 year. These floods caused deaths of

peoples, destroyed the crops, villages and caused high economic loss.

Hashmi et al. (2012) study revealed that major cause of flood in Pakistan is

heavy rainfall in the river catchment, which sometimes augmented by

snowmelt flows, result in to flood in the river during the monsoon season. The

monsoon current originating in the Bay of Bengal and resulting depression

frequently result in heavy downpour in the Himalayan foothills affected

multiples of small scale economic profit.

Dixon and Schaffer (2010) explained that the flood ruined the houses,

destroyed the standing crop, roads, bridges, and railway line which are the

most important assets of the country. It affected the lives of large number of

villages, rural areas and cities. It badly affects the lives of people they lived in

camps and faced many health problems like diarrhea, respiratory and water

borne disease. The big issue was the reestablishment of the affected areas.

Flood swiped away the landmark and many other official documents

disappeared that result in land dispute among the rural internal migrants.

2.11 Floods affect the economic activities


One of the loss due to flood is the traffic interruption that is total of marginal

cost. The duration of closer of any particular road due to flood and diversion

routes and relocation traffic are the two important factors in traffic

interruption loss estimation. Flood also causes damage to the infrastructure.

Flood damage is categorized in to three main groups: urban, rural and

infrastructure. The urban flood damage includes the direct damage to the

residential and non residential buildings, which are damage to building

structure property, damage to building content /stock, damage to outside

property and emergency and clean up cost. rural damage include the

agriculture sector ,taking agriculture farm infrastructures are damage to crops

and vegeTables ,damage to farmland and infrastructure and damage to farm

houses (Dutta, Herath and Musaiake 2003).

Study made by Jonkman et al. (2006) reflects that Flood damage to the

residential property and damage to public structures, infrastructures and

utilities like roads, railroads, water defenses, electricity network and drainage.

Veen and Logtmeijer (2005) studied that the economic damage to the concept

of vulnerability which is defined as the function of dependency, redundancy

and susceptibility. Susceptibility is the chance and degree of flooding.

Dependency is the degree to which an activity relates to other economic

activities in the country. Input-output multipliers form representation of this

dependency. Redundancy is the ability of an economic activity to respond to a


disaster by differing, using relocation. Redundancy is measure as a degree of

centrality of an economic activity in a network. The more central the

economic activity is, the less it encounters possibilities to transfer production

and the more vulnerable it is for flooding. Disasters like flooding have an

enormous impact on local and national economies.

The cedar rapid flood was a huge natural disaster with major community

impact. The flooding water caused devastation throughout the city on its

citizens, business, property owners, public buildings, religious and cultural

organization and transportation facilities. Flood directly or indirectly affected

the business of the area. A number of businesses have lost and many have to

reopen as a result of flood. Number of jobs lost due to flood. There are four

main regional economic impact of flood: Damage, recovery effort effects,

business losses and change in business productivity. Damage includes the

physical outcomes of flooding: destroyed houses, roads damaged, bridges

washed out, household affected and business disrupted. Recovery creates the

local spending. Temporary support is provided to the flood victims by the

public assistance .reconstruction of public infrastructure will replace the

existing structure. The local business located in flood impact area experience

lost inventories, sales, productivity and profit. There may also be business

failure and job losses. The property will less productive in future if it is not

protected through some type of improvement (Robinson 2010).


2.2 Indicators

1. Global warming a causative factor of flood.

2. Climate change leads to flood.

3. Intense rainfall cause flood.

4. High summer temperature is major factor of flood.

5. River outflow leads to flood.

6. Glacier melting and snow fall main factor of flood.

7. Floods affect the economic activities.


Chapter 3

THEORITICAL FRAMEWORK

In this chapter the researcher applied a theory to throw light on the topic of

study. The purpose of theoretical framework is to build linkage between the

present study and the previous work.

3.1 Theory of relative deprivation

The relative deprivation theory was given by Robert chamber (2003).

According to this theory the poor was trapped in poverty cycle which is called

as deprivation trap. There are five clusters of disadvantages among the poor

households; they are poor, physically weak, isolated, vulnerable and

powerless. The root of all this disadvantages is poverty. The poverty lead to

the physical weakness due to insufficient food and poor health; due to which

the poor become isolated because of incapability to pay for education;


vulnerability because of lack of resources to gather emergencies like illness; it

leads to powerlessness because of low status that goes with lack of wealth.

3.2 Application of the theory

The theory of relative deprivation given by Robert Chamber is closely linked

with natural hazard (flood) in Booni Chitral. Chitral has a rural back ground.

The people of Chitral are powerless economically and politically. The disaster

(flood) mostly happens in this area, the people of Chitral have no capacity to

cope with the problem they are dependent upon the government. Government

does not play an active role to overcome the natural disaster (flood) in the

area. Due to which the flood prevails for long time and the people become

vulnerable. Chitral is isolated from the other developed region due to its

geography. When flood occur, it destroy the roads due to which it totally cut

off from the other regions and economic activities stop for several days, some

time for a month. When road block due to flood in rural areas it remains

blocked for several days because the Government has no active role in these

areas, they are politically powerless but when the hazard occurs in city like

Islamabad, it takes few seconds to restore, this is because they have strong

political power. Due to the prevalence of flood the economic activities of the

area badly suffered and stopped. Other organizations also stopped their visit to

these areas due to the road blockage which leads to decline in the economic

activities of people and leads to poverty. Due to the prevalence of poverty the
poor people become physically weak and cannot be able to perform their

normal activities.
Theory of Relative Flood and Economic
Deprivation Activities

Powerless Politicaly, and Economicaly


powerless people of Chitral

The region is isolated from other


Isolation developed areas because of its
Geography

Due to flood the eonomic activities


sufffered and the people became
Vulnarabilty vulnarable

Most of the people are living in


Poverty poverty

Flood affect the economic activities, the


Phisically economy suffers and people became
Weak phisicaly weak

Figure no 3.1

3.3 propositions

1. The people of Chitral are politically deprived.


2. When the flood happened in the region they are unable to cope with it.

3. The government has no such active role in the area.

3. Due to the isolation of the area with other cities the government not much

paid attention to it.

4. The area does not get any relief from the government; they spend their time

in the rehabilitation due to which the economic activities suffers.

3.4 Assumptions

1. Flood is the most frequently occurring disastrous natural hazard.

2. The main cause of flood is associated with the global warming.

3. The climatic change that includes rising temperature and intense

rainfall, results in flood.

4. Flood caused crop failure impacted on the critical sector of the

economy.

5. The strong flood water badly affects the standing crops and uprooted

them.

6. Floods indirectly affect the agricultural activities by damaging the

crop, habitation, livestock and field.

7. Glacier melting and snowfall leads to the flood.

8. Deforestation caused the flood level to rise.


9. Business has to shut down in the flood point areas, influence the

economic activities and result in economic loss.

10. Flood causes damage to the infrastructure, destroyed the crops,

villages and cause high economic loss.

11. Flood damaged the residential property, and damage to the public

structure, infrastructure and utilities like roads, railroads, water

defenses, electricity network and drainage.

12. Flood directly or indirectly affect the business. A number of

businesses have lost many have to reopen and number of job lost due

to flood.

3.5 Hypothesis

3.5. Alternative Hypothesis

The more the flood, the more the economic activities will affect in

Booni Chitral.

3.5.2 Null Hypothesis

There is no relationship between flood and economic activities in

Booni Chitral.
Chapter No.4

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

In the research methodology the researcher selected the method and

techniques used in the study for the data collection and systematic techniques
to be used in the literature survey a model of questionnaire about the impact of

flood on the economic activities of people in Booni Chitral.

4.1 Universe

Booni valley of Chitral was selected for the research project because flood has

become more frequent in the area. Being an inhabitant of this particular area

(Chitral), the researcher felt that she can easily make an access to the

information about the impact of flood on the economic activities of people in

the area.

4.2 Target population

The researcher included male and female population having the age group of

18-61.Because this age group included the young and adult people and they

have more information about the flood and its impacts on the economic

activities of the area.

4.3 Sampling frame

Simple Random sampling method was used for collecting samples because

flood affected the whole region of the area. Therefore the researcher decided

to choose a simple random method where the people or those people who

were willing to fill the interviewing schedule precisely, filled the

questionnaire.

4.5 Sample size


The researcher collected the data from a chosen sample of two hundred (200)

Respondents because the collection of data from the whole population was not

possible. So a sample size of two hundred was enough to get necessary

information in short time span and obtain appropriate result.

4.6 Tools for data collection

The researcher designed an interviewing schedule and collected data on the

basis of that interviewing schedule.

4.7 Techniques for data collection

In this research interviewing schedule used for data collection because

illiterate Respondents were also included and was more appropriate for the

researcher to collect more in-depth information from Respondents.

4.8 Pretesting

The researcher was taken ten Respondents in order to pretest the

questionnaire. The respondents was taken in such a way that they are also

belonging to the area of research where the researchers do her research.

4.9 Data Analysis


The whole data was converted in to inferential form through SPSS 20

(statistical package for social science) system. The researcher used descriptive

and inferential statistics to analyze the data.

4.10 Opportunities and limitations

The research works provided an opportunity to the local people to understand

the causes and impacts of flood in the area. The research works also provide

awareness to the coming generation so that they can take careful steps in

dealing with the issue.

There were certain limitations of the research work. The data have been

collected on the basis of written questionnaire and their might be certain

people who could not respond to each and every question. So there might be

possibility that certain important data could miss.

4.11 Ethical concerns

A researcher kept confidential, all the personal information about the

respondents. A researcher asked question in such a way that respondents must

not feel any kind of discomfort while answering such questions.


Chapter no 5

CONCEPTUALIZATIO AND OPERATIONALIZATION


4.1 Conceptualization

Conceptualization is the process of designing the concept with the help of

existing literature. In this study the researcher has two variables, flood and

economic activities. These concepts are conceptualized here.

4.1.1 Flood:

According to the National Weather Services (NWS) (2010) “flood is an

overflow of water into normally dry land. The flood normally occur dry area

caused by the rising water in an existing waterway, such as river, stream, or

drainage ditch. Flooding is a longer term event than flash flooding: it may last

days or weeks.”

National Geographic (NG) define flood as “an overflow of a large amount of

water beyond its normal limits, especially over what is normally dry land: the

villager had been cut off by floods and landslides.”

Nash (2012) Flood is defined as “the covering of normally dry land by water

that has escaped or been released from the normal confines of any of the

following: a lake, a river, a creek, a canal and dame another natural

watercourse whether or not it has been altered or modified.

4.1.2 Economic

Smith (1776) Economics is defined as “the production of wealth, consumption

of wealth, distribution of wealth and exchange of wealth.”


Economics is the branch of knowledge that deals with the production and

distribution of wealth (Shorter Oxford English Dictionary 2002).

Economics is the social science that studies economic activities to gain an

understanding of the process that govern the production, distribution and

consumption of goods and services in an economy (The free encyclopedia).

According to the Cambridge Advanced Learners Dictionary (2008)

Economics is defined as the way in which, trade, industry or money is

organized.

4.1.3: Activities

The condition in which things are happening or being done. For example there

has been a sustained level of activity in the economy (Cambridge Advanced

Learners Dictionary 2008).

The measurable amount of work performed to convert inputs into output

(business dictionary).

The state of being activity, the exertion of energy, actions ( Shorter Oxford

English Dictionary 2002 ).


4.2 Oprationalization

4.2.1Flood

Flood is in the context of this study explained that way it is natural disaster.

Due to global warming the temperature become increased the glacier and

snow on the mountains melts rapidly and caused flood. Heavy rainfall is also a

factor of flood. Flood mostly happened on that area where the river, canal,

stream and glacier exist. Flood mostly happen in summer season. It causes

damage to the crops, infrastructure, buildings, fields, cultivation process and

the roads.

4.2.2 Economic

In the context of this study is economics is the basic need of human beings,

the basic need of human life, without economic circle human being cannot

survive in the society. Food is essential need of human beings, they cannot

survive without food. Therefore people perform many activities to fulfill their

economic needs. The economic condition is includes source of earning and

profession of human beings. The Chitral economy included agriculture,

farming, fruit business, shops, livestock, government and public jobs, and

crop cultivation.

4.2.2 Activities

According to this study people perform many economic activities like

livestock, agriculture, crops cultivation, farming, shops keepers, do


government and private jobs and small business to generate some assets for

their household. When flood occurred people source of earning disturb.

People became engaged in the rehabilitation of the affected area, due to which

their normal activities disturbed; their money and time spend on the

rehabilitation of affected houses, land and roads. Flood has great impact on

the agriculture, live stock, infrastructure, cultivated land and other business of

people. They faced a huge loss from the economy. This become very difficult

for the daily wages employs in Chitral to survive at that condition.


Chapter no 6

RESULTS
This chapter is divided into two parts, the descriptive analysis and inferential

statistics.

6.1 Descriptive analysis

The descriptive analysis presents the data in the form of Table and

frequencies. The finding of the research was described in this section through

Tables and frequencies. The finding of the research was presented with the

help of data below.

Table no 6.1.1 Gender of the respondents

Categories Frequency Percent

Male 115 57.5%

Female 85 42.5%

Total 200 100.0%

Table 6.1 shows that 57.5% respondents were male and 42.5 were female.

This was concluded from the above Table that 57% of the respondents were

male.
Table no 6.1.2 Age of the respondents

Categories Frequency Percent

18-28 61 30.5

29-39 68 34.0

40-50 39 19.5

51-61 25 12.5

61 and above 7 3.5

Total 200 100.0

Table 6.2 shows that 61 respondents had an age group of 18-28 68

respondents were the age of 29-39, 39 had the age group of 40-50, and 25 had

the age of 51-61 and were lies in the age group of 61 and above.

It was concluded from the Table that 34% of the respondents had age of 29-

39.
Table no 6.1.3 Family type of the respondents

Categories Frequency Percent

Nuclear 82 41.0

Joint 116 58.0

Extended 2 1.0

Total 200 100.0

Table 6.3 shows the family type of the respondents. 41% of the respondents

were belonging to nuclear families, 58% were belonging to joint families, and

2 were living in extended families.

This was concluded that 58% of the respondents were living in joint families.
Table no 6.1.4 Number of family members of the respondents

Categories Frequency Percent

2-5 35 17.5

6-9 106 53.0

10-13 51 25.5

14-17 8 4.0

Total 200 100.0

Table 6.1.4 shows the number of family member of the respondents. The

Table reveals that 53% of the respondents were having 6-9 family members,

25.5% were having 10-13 family members, 17.5% were having 2-5 family

members and 4% respondents were having 14.17 family members.

This was concluded that the average family size was included 6-9 family

members.
Table no 6.1.5 Marital status of respondents

Categories Frequency Percent

Single 63 31.5

Married 131 65.5

Widow 6 3.0

Total 200 100.0

Table 6.1.5 shows the marital status of the respondents. This shows that 65%

of the total respondents were married, 31.5% were single (unmarried) and 3%

were widow.

This was concluded that 65.5 respondents were married.


Table no 6.1.6 Monthly family income of the respondents

Categories Frequency Percent

10,000-20,000 63 31.5

20,0001-30,000 57 28.5

30,0001-40,000 53 26.5

40,0001 and above 27 13.5

Total 200 100.0

Table 6.1.6 reveals the total family income of the respondents and shows that

31% had 10,000-20,000 monthly family income , 28% respondents had 20,

0001-30,000, 26.5% respondents were in the category of 30, 0001-40,000

family income and 13.5% respondents had 40, 0001 and above family income.

This was concluded that the average family income was 10,000-20,000

monthly.
Table no 6.1.7 Academic qualifications of the respondents

Categories Frequency Percent

Illiterate 41 20.5

Primary 1 .5

Middle 20 10.0

Secondary 21 10.5

Intermediate 12 6.0

Bachelor 35 17.5

Master and above 70 35.0

Total 200 100.0

Table 6.1.7 reveals that 35% of the respondents were qualified masters and

above level, 20.5% were illiterate, 17.5% had bachelor level education ,

10.5% were secondary qualified, 10% were middle qualified, 6% were

intermediate qualified and 5% had primary qualification.


This was concluded that that average 35% of the respondents had master and

above level education.

Table no 6.1.8 Occupation of the respondents

Categories Frequency Percent

Agriculture 19 9.5

Government Servant 37 18.5

Private Job 62 31.0

Self Business 15 7.5

Unemployed 67 33.5

Total 200 100.0

Table 6.8 indicates that 33.5% respondents were unemployed, 31% were

doing private job, 18.5% were government servant, 9.5% were dependent on

agriculture and 7.5% were having self business.

This was concluded that average 31% respondents were doing private jobs.
Table no 6.1.9 Respondents opinion regarding flood most frequently occur in

the area

Categories Frequency Percent

Yes 188 94.0

No 9 4.5

Don't know 3 1.5

Total 200 100.0

The above Table reveals that out of the total 200 Respondents 94% gave

positive response to the statement that “flood frequently occur in the area”,

4.5% were said no and 1.5% were in the category of do not know.

This was concluded that 94% of the respondents gave positive response,

which shows that flood most frequently occur in their area.


Table no 6.1.10 Respondents opinion regarding flood as disastrous hazard

Categories Frequency Percent

Yes 191 95.5

No 7 3.5

Don't Know 2 1.0

Total 200 100.0

The Table 6.1.10 indicates that 95.5% respondents were agreed that “flood is

the most disastrous hazard in the area”, 3.5% respondents were rejected the

statement and 1.0 percent were unaware.

This was concluded that 95.5% respondents gave positive response which

showed flood was the most disastrous hazard in the area.


Table no 6.1.11 Respondents views regarding heavy rainfall a factor of flood

Categories Frequency Percent

Yes 186 93.0

No 10 5.0

Don't Know 4 2.0

Total 200 100.0

Table 6.11 reveals that in a response to a question “heavy rainfall is a factor of

flood” 93% were given positive response, 5% were disagreeing and 2% were

in the category of do not know.

This was concluded that 93% respondents said yes which shows that heavy

rainfall was a main factor of flood in the region.


Table no 6.1.12 Respondents opinion regarding heavy rainfall a factor of

flood

Categories Frequency Percent

Yes 193 96.5

No 7 3.5

Total 200 100.0

The above Table shows that 96% respondents were gave positive response

and 3.5 were disagreeing.

This was concluded that 96.5% respondents said yes because the reason was

that the research area was a hilly area Surrounded by mountains covered with

snow. The melting of snow due to high temperature in the summer season

caused flood in the area.


Table 6.1.13 Respondents opinion regarding occurrence of flood due to

mountainous structure

Categories Frequency Percent

Yes 151 75.5

No 19 9.5

Don't Know 30 15.0

Total 200 100.0

Table 6.1.13 indicates that 75.5 respondents were agreed to the question

“flood occurs due to mountainous structure of land” 9.5% were disagreed

and15% were in the category of don’t know.

This was concluded that 75.5% of the respondents were the opinion that due

to mountainous structure, the land of the area is not plain due to which the rain

water not absorbed in the land and caused in to the flood.


Table no 6.14 Respondents opinion regarding deforestation a cause of flood in

the region

Categories Frequency Percent

Yes 110 55.0

No 82 41.0

Don't Know 8 4.0

Total 200 100.0

The above Table shows that in response to a question “deforestation a cause

of flood in the region” 55% were agreeing, 41% were not agreeing and 4%

respondents were in the category of don’t know.

This was concluded that 55%of respondents were agreed with the statement.

This shows that deforestation was a factor of flood; the reason was the usage

of wood in the area because there was no gas facility present in the region. A

large number of people were depending upon the trees because they were

using these woods for fire material.


Table no 6.1.15 Respondents perception regarding flood as a natural

phenomenon

Categories Frequency Percent

Yes 166 83.0

No 33 16.5

Don't Know 1 .5

Total 200 100.0

The above Table shows that 83% respondents said yes to the statement “flood

is a natural phenomenon” 1% said no and 0.5% said do not know.

This was concluded that 83% respondents perceived flood as a natural

phenomenon.
Table no 6.1.16 Respondents perception about flood happens as result of

misdeed of people

Categories Frequency Percent

Yes 83 41.5

No 98 49.0

Don't Know 19 9.5

Total 200 100.0

The Table reveals that 49% respondents were not in the favor that flood

occurred due to the misdeed of people, 41% respondents were agreed and 9.5

were in the category of do not know.

It is concluded by the above responses that people perceive flood as natural

phenomenon not happened due to the misdeed of people.


Table no 6.1.17 Respondents opinion regarding flood occurs only in summer

season

Categories Frequency Percent

Yes 186 93.0

No 13 6.5

Don't Know 1 .5

Total 200 100.0

The Table indicates that 93% respondents 93% said yes to the question, 6.5%

said no and 0.5% was unaware.

This was concluded 93% of the respondents said that the flood occurred only

in summer because the temperature in summer increase which lead to the

heavy melting of glacier and result in flood.


Table no 6.1.18 Respondents opinion regarding overgrazing is a factor of

flood

Categories Frequency Percent

Yes 176 88.0

No 11 5.5

Don't Know 13 6.5

Total 200 100.0

The Table 6.1.18 determines that 88% respondents were given positive

response to the statement that “over grazing pave the path for the flood in the

region”, 6.5% were unaware and 5.5% were disagreeing.

It was concluded that 176% of the respondents were agreed that overgrazing

pave the path for the flood in the region, because cattle breeding was practiced

in the area. These cattle were the main reason of overgrazing and destroying

the large area of greeneries. The soil became soft and easily eroded by rain

water that contributes to flood.


Table no 6.19 Respondents opinion regarding flood affect the cultivation

process

Categories Frequency Percent

Yes 197 98.5

No 3 1.5

Total 200 100.0

The above Table states that 98.5% of the total 200 Respondents said yes to the

question “flood affect the cultivation process of farmer in the region” and

1.3% respondents said no to the question.

The researcher concluded that 98.5% respondents said yes that flood affect the

cultivation process of the area because most of the people of the area were

engaged in the agricultural sector.


Table no 6.1.20 Respondents opinion regarding time consumption in

rehabilitation of flood affected land

Categories Frequency Percent

Yes 174 87.0

No 17 8.5

Don't Know 9 4.5

Total 200 100.0

The Table 6.1.19 reveals that 87% respondents were agreeing to the statement

“time consumed in the rehabilitation of flood effected land” which was, 8.5%

said no and 4.5 were in the category of do not know.

This was concluded that 174% respondents were agreed that their time

consumed in the rehabilitation, because the flood damaged their land badly.
Table no 6.21 Respondents opinion regarding flood affects the irrigation

system

Categories Frequency Percent

Yes 191 95.5

No 5 2.5

Don't Know 4 2

Total 200 100.0

The Table 6.1.21 shows that in a response of the question “does flood affect

the irrigation system of the region” 95% respondents said yes, 2.5% were said

no and 2% were in the category of do not know.

The researcher was concluded that 95.5% respondents said yes because the

main source of land irrigation is canal system and the flood was ruined the

canal system of the area.


Table 6.1.22 Respondents opinion regarding flood destroys the crops

Categories Frequency Percent

Yes 190 95.0

No 9 4.5

11 1 .5

Total 200 100.0

The below Table 6.1.22 indicates that 95% respondents were agreed to the

statement “flood destroy the crop in the summer season”, 0.5% were

disagreeing and 0.5% respondents were unaware.

It was concluded by the above responses 95% of the respondents were agreed.

The reason was that the people of the area were dependent on agriculture, two

types of crops like rice and wheat were grown in the area in the summer and

flood destroyed the crops.


Table 6.1.23 Respondents opinion regarding flood destroy the fruit trees and

affect the dry fruit business

Categories Frequency Percent

Yes 171 85.5

No 23 11.5

Don't Know 6 3.0

Total 200 100.0

The Table 6.1.23 illustrates that 85.5% respondents were in the favor of the

statement “flood destroy the trees due to which the dry fruit business disturb”,

11.5% were disagreed and 3% were in the category of do not know.

This was concluded that 85.5% respondents said yes because local people

were depending upon the fruit trees like apricot, apple, peach, walnut, grapes

and cherry for their business. The flood destroyed the trees which badly

affected the dry fruit business of the region.


Table no 6.1.24 Respondents opinion regarding flood affected the cultivated

Categories Frequency Percent

Yes 189 94.5

No 10 5.0

Don't Know 1 .5

Total 200 100.0

The Table 6.1.24 describes that 94% respondents were sure that cultivated

land was affected by the flood in their area which made, 5% respondents were

refused and 0.5% were ignorant of the statement.

This was concluded that 94.5% of the respondents were agreed that flood

affected the cultivated land of the area because most of the land was used for

cultivation process in the region. Different types of crops were cultivated in

the region like maize, rice, wheat and beans.


Table 6.1.25 Respondents opinion about flood destroyed the livestock in the

village

Categories Frequency Percent

Yes 139 69.5

No 55 27.5

Don't Know 6 3.0

Total 200 100.0

The above Table illustrates that 69% respondents said yes in the response of

the question” flood has destroyed the livestock”, 27% respondents said No

and 3% respondents said do not know.

It was concluded from the above responses that 69.5% respondents were

having the opinion that flood destroyed the livestock of the region.
Table no 6.1.26 Respondents opinion regarding the breakage of roads disturbs

the economic activities

Categories Frequency Percent

Yes 185 92.5

No 14 7.0

Don’t know 1 .5

Total 200 100.0

The Table 6.26 reveals that to the response of a question “do breakage of

roads disturb the economic activities during the flood” 92.5% were agreed,

7% were disagreed and 0.5% were in the category of do not know.

This was concluded that 92.5% were said that breakage of roads disturbs the

economic activities of the area, because the people cut off from the other

region due to road breakage.


Table no 6.1.27 Respondents opinion the flood ruined the houses of people in

the area

Categories Frequency Percent

Yes 166 83.0

No 31 15.5

Don't Know 3 1.5

Total 200 100.0

The Table 6.27 indicates that 83% of the respondents said yes flood ruined the

houses in the area, 15.5% said no and 1.5% said do not know.

This was concluded that 83%of respondents said flood ruined the houses of

people in the area.


Table 6.1.28 Respondents opinion regarding flood affected the government

building

Categories Frequency Percent

Yes 95 47.5

No 94 47.0

Don't Know 11 5.5

Total 200 100.0

The above Table shows that 47% respondents said yes that government

buildings like school, offices, hospitals etc were affected by the flood in the

region, 47% respondents response were no and 5.5% respondents were in the

category of do not know.

This was concluded from the above Table that of respondents 47% were

agreed that flood affect the government buildings like school, offices,

hospitals and forestry offices.


Table no 6.1.29 Respondents opinion regarding business losses are outcomes

of flood in the region

Categories Frequency Percent

Yes 145 72.5

No 40 20.0

Don't Know 15 7.5

Total 200 100.0

The above Table illustrate that in the response of a question “are business

losses also outcome of the flood” 72.5%of respondents said yes, 20% said no

and 7.5% said do not know.

In was concluded from the above Table that 72.5% respondents were agreed

that business losses were the result of flood.


Table no 6.1.30 Respondents opinion regarding breakdown of electricity

suffer economic activities during flood

Categories Frequency Percent

Yes 179 89.5

No 13 6.5

Don't Know 8 4.0

Total 200 100.0

The above Table shows that out of the total 200 respondents 89.5% were

agreed, 6.5 were disagreed and 6.5% were neutral.

This was concluded that 89.5% respondents said that due to the breakdown of

electricity the economic activities suffered because most of the economic

activities were linked with the electricity network.


Table 6.1.31 Respondents opinion regarding the shutdown of business during

flood causes the economic activities decline

Categories Frequency Percent

Yes 170 85.0

No 21 10.5

Don't Know 9 4.5

Total 200 100.0

The Table 6.1.31 demonstrates that 85% respondents said yes that different

business like shops, farms and stocks were to shut down during flood that

caused the economic activities decline, 10.5% respondents said no and 4.5%

said do not know.

This was concluded from the above Table that 170% respondents were

agreeing. Because the people of the area were engaged with such type of

business like farms, shops and stock. During the flood they have to shut down

their shops farms and stocks which result in the decline of economic activities.
Table no 6.1.32 Respondents opinions about the effect of flood on self

employed business and private job.

Categories Frequency Percent

Yes 140 70.0

No 54 27.0

Don't Know 6 3.0

Total 200 100.0

The Table shows that in response of a question “self employed business and

private job suffer due to flood” 70% respondents were agreed, 27% were

disagreed and 3 percent were unaware.

This was concluded that 70% of the respondents said yes that their self

employed business and private jobs were suffered due to the flood.
Table 6.1.33 Respondents opinions about due to flood disruption employees

do not get their salaries

Categories Frequency Percent

Yes 93 46.5

No 91 45.5

Don't Know 16 8.0

Total 200 100.0

The above Table reveals that 46.5% respondents gave positive response to a

statement “due to flood disruption employees do not get their salaries” 45.5

was disagreed and 8 % were unaware.

It was concluded from the above Table that average 46.5% respondents were

gave positive response. The respondents do not get their salaries at time due to

flood disruption.
Table no 6.1.34 Respondents opinion regarding flood increases land fertility

Categories Frequency Percent

Yes 45 22.5

No 141 70.5

Don't Know 14 7.0

Total 200 100.0

The above Table mentions that 70% respondents said no that flood did not

increased the fertility of the soil, 22.5% said yes and 7 were unaware.

This was concluded that the 70% respondents were not agreed. Flood did not

make fertile the soil because the flood in the area brings gravel and big stones

with it.
Table no 6.35 Respondents opinion regarding most of the money and time

spent for rehabilitation of drinking water supply after flood

Categories Frequency Percent

Yes 166 83.0

No 29 14.5

Don't Know 5 2.5

Total 200 100.0

The Table indicates that 83% respondents out of the total 200 said yes they

spends most of their money and time for the rehabilitation of drinking water

supply after flood, 14.5 said no and 2.5 were in the category of do not know.

This was concluded that 83%of respondents were agreed. They spend most of

their money and time in the rehabilitation of drinking water supply because

they water supply system was self helped not by any NG0 or Government.
Table no 6.1.36 Respondents opinion regarding flood gave advantage to plant

and animals

Categories Frequency Percent

Yes 33 16.5

No 137 68.5

Don't Know 30 15.0

Total 200 100.0

The Table illustrates that 68.5% respondents were disagreed with the

statement “flood can gave advantage to the flora and fauna” 16.5% were

agreed and 15% were unaware.

This was concluded from the Table that 68% respondents said no because the

flood in the area do not gives any advantage to plants and animals. It causes to

the damage of plant and harm the animals.


Table no 6.1.37 Respondents opinion regarding flood cleans the environment

Categories Frequency Percent

Yes 16 8.0

No 164 82.0

Don't Know 20 10.0

Total 200 100.0

The above Table indicates that 82% said flood don not cleans the

environment, 10% were unaware and 8% said yes.

This was concluded that 82% respondents said flood does not clean the

environment because the flood gave harms to the environment by destroying

the plants and greeneries. It brings much waste and trash material that polluted

thee environment.
6.2 Inferential statistics

The second part of this chapter included the inferential statistics. The

researcher applied Chi-squares to see the relationship between dependent and

independent variable.

6.2.1 Hypothesis

Verifying the association between the frequently occurring flood and its affect

on cultivation process.

H0. The frequently occurring flood more likely affects the cultivation process.

H1. The frequently occurring flood less likely affects the cultivation process.

Significance Level

α =0.005
6.2.1 Most frequently occurring flood * Flood Affect the cultivation process.

Do you think that Flood Affect Total

the cultivation process of

farmer in the region?

Yes No

Does Flood occur most Yes 186 2 188

frequently in your area


No 9 0 9
from the past five

years? Don't know 2 1 3

Total 197 3 200

The above Table shows that the responses of the respondents on the

hypothetical statement that the flood frequently occurs in Chitral and affects

the cultivation process of the area. The row 188 respondents were agreed, 9

respondents said no and 3 said do not know. The column 186 respondents said

yes and 2 said no. this was concluded that there is a relationship between the

flood and its affect on the cultivation process of Booni Chitral. The flood

more frequently occur in Chitral and affects the cultivation process of the

area.
Chi-square

Value Df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 20.955a 2 20.955a

Likelihood Ratio 5.182 2 .075

a. 4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .05.
The Pearson Chi-Square value in the above Table is 20.955, degree of

freedom is 2 and significance level is 0.000. It is significant because the value

is less than 0.005. So the alternate hypothesis is accepted and the null

hypothesis is rejected.
6.2.2 Hypothesis

Checking the association between the hazardous flood and time consumed in

the rehabilitation of flood affected land.

H1. The more the hazardous flood the more likely it will affect the land.

H0. The more the hazardous flood the less likely it will affect the land.

6.2.2 Flood is the most disastrous hazard*most of the time consume in the

rehabilitation of flood affected land.

Do you agree that most of your time Total

consumes in rehabilitation of flood

affected land?

Yes No Don't

Know

Yes 170 13 8 191

Do you think flood is


No 2 4 1 7
the most disastrous

hazard in your area? Don't


2 0 0 2
Know

Total 174 17 9 200


The above Table shows that the responses of the respondents on the

hypothetical statement that the disastrous flood affected the land and most of

the time of Chitral inhabitant during its rehabilitation. The row 191

respondents out of the total 200 were agreed, 7 respondents were disagreed

and 2 were unaware. The column 170 respondents were agreed, 13 were

disagreed and 8 were unaware. This shows that the disastrous flood affect the

land in Chitral and most the time of the inhabitant’s waste during the

rehabilitation of the land.

Chi-square

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 24.795a 4 .000

Likelihood Ratio 14.479 4 .006

a. 5 cells (55.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .09
The Pearson Chi-Square value is 24.795, degree of freedom is 4 and the

significance level is 0.000. It is significant because the value is less than

0.005. So the alternate hypothesis is accepted and the null hypothesis is

rejected

6.2.3 Hypothesis
Checking the relationship between flood occurred due to deforestation and

causes the business losses.

H1. Flood occurs due to deforestation more likely affect the businesses.

H0. Flood occurs due to deforestation less likely affect the buisnesss.

Are Business losses also outcomes of Total

flood in the region?

Yes No Don't Know

Yes 72 29 9 110

Is deforestation a
No 69 10 3 82
cause of flood in

the region? Don't


4 1 3 8
Know

Total 145 40 15 200

Table 6.2.3 Deforestation leads to flood* Business losses are also outcomes of

flood.
The above Table shows the responses of the respondents on the hypothetical

statement that flood occur due to the deforestation and cause the business loss.

The column majority 110 out of the total 200 respondents gave positive

response, 8 were disagreed and 2 were unaware. The row 145 respondents out

of the total 200 respondents 145 said yes 40 respondents said no and 15 said

do not know. This shows that deforestation is the main factor of flood in

Chitral. The inhabitants fruit business, farms, livestock sand other business

suffered due to flood, which cause business loss.

Chi-square

Value Df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 19.077a 4 .001

Likelihood Ratio 14.969 4 .005

a. 2 cells (22.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .60.

A Pearson Chi-square has a value of 19.077, degree of freedom is 4 and the

Significance level is 0.001. This concluded that the data is significant. It

meant that alternate hypothesis is accepted and the null hypothesis is rejected.
6.2.4 Hypothesis

To check the association between the summer flood and it’s affects on the

houses of people.

H1. The summer flood more likely affects the houses of the people in Chitral.

H0. The summer flood less likely affects the houses of people in Chitral.

6.2.4 Flood occurs only in summer season * Flood ruins the houses of the
people.

Did Flood ruin the houses of the Total

people in your area?

Yes No Don't Know

Yes 159 24 3 186

Flood occurs only in


No 7 6 0 13
summer season in

your area? Don't


0 1 0 1
Know

Total 166 31 3 200


The above Table shows the responses of the respondents on the hypothetical

statement that summer flood ruined the house of people in Chitral. The

column 186 respondents were agreed, 13 were disagreed and 1 said do not

know. The row 166 out of the total respondents was agreed, 31 were disagreed

and 3 were unaware. This means that majority of the respondents were agreed,

the summer flood badly affected the houses and buildings in Chitral.

Chi-square

Value Df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 15.822a 4 .003

Likelihood Ratio 11.775 4 .019

a. 6 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected

count is .02.

A Pearson chi-square has value of 15.822, degree o f freedom is 4 and

Significance level is 0.003. This is concluded that the data is significant. The

alternative hypothesis is accepted because the value is less than 0.005 and null

hypothesis is rejected.
Chapter no 7

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSSION


7.1 Discussion

This research was conducted in order to highlight the impact of flood on the

economic activities of people in Chitral. 200 Respondents were taken as a

sample in order to find the flood impacts on the economic activities. The flood

affected badly the economic activities of the area. One of the main objectives

of the study was to highlight the major factors of flood in Booni chitral. It

means that what were the main factors that lead to flood in Chitral valley.

These all objectives were discussed and achieved in the present research.

Flood is taken as independent variable and economic activities are dependent

variable in this study. The researcher discussed that flood was the most

disastrous natural hazard in the area. As the previous study suggested that

flood is the most frequently occurring disastrous hazard of Aasam, every year

the area was adversely affected by the flood and considered the biggest cause

of property and life in Assam (Milli, Acharjiee and konwar 2003). The present

study reveals that the data from the sample showed that flood was mostly

occurring from the past five years in Chitral. About 92% of the respondents

were given positive response that flood has affected their economic activities.

As the data suggested that there were several reasons of flood out of which the

most factors were heavy rainfall, heavy melting glacier, and deforestation and

over grazing. 83%of respondents were agreed the major factor of flood in

their region was deforestation, because they trees were used for woods for the
fuel and construction purposes. 87%of respondents were said that flood has

affected their economic activities and they were suffering its consequences. A

large number people were agreed that overgrazing was also a main factor of

flood. Cattle breeding was practiced by the people, cattle were grazed in the

pastures as a result they made the soil soft and rain water easily eroded the

soil which caused the flood. Flood affected their cultivation process, irrigation

system, destroyed the crops, cultivated land, and ruined the houses,

government buildings like schools, offices and hospitals. Most of the people

of the area were have their most dependency on agriculture. The crop

production is very important for them and they were earning more from the

cultivation. 95% of respondents said that flood destroyed their crops. The chi-

square test result showed that there is an association between the flood and the

cultivation process. Flood badly affected the cultivation process of the farmer

in the region. Most of their time was consumed in the rehabilitation of the

flood affected land.

Most of the people of the areas were dependents on the fruit business. The

flood destroyed the fruit tress which placed very bad impact on their dry fruit

business. Flood also result in the breakage of roads due to which the economic

activities of people were highly suffered. The data suggested some several

distractions that were occurred due to flood and cause the decline of the

economic activities. Out of them was the breakdown of electricity which

caused the disturbance in the economic activities.


The chi-square test result showed that flood that occurs in the summer is very

destructive; it ruined the houses of the peoples. The present study reveals that

the people of Chitral were engaged in many different businesses like shops

and farms. During flood the shop and farms were closed for several days, and

some time the flood washed away the shops and farms and caused the decline

in the economic activities. of respondents were in the view that the self

employed and private jobs were suffered due to flood and the salary was not

getting by the employees due to the flood disruption.

During flood the people of Chitral were not performed their normal activities,

and after flood the people became engaged with the rehabilitation of flood due

to which the economic activities badly suffered. The study revealed that the

people have spent most of their money and time in rehabilitation of drinking

water supply also. The overall data suggested that due to the flood most of the

economic activities of people were suffered which is supporting the

Alternative hypothesis.
7.2 Conclusion

This study was conducted in Booni Chitral Khyber Pukhtunkhaw (KPK) to

identify the impact of flood on the economic activities of people in the area.

The researcher tried to highlight the factors of flood in the region. The study

concluded that deforestation, heavy rain fall, overgrazing and glacier melting

were main the factors of flood in the area. The reason of deforestation was the

usage of wood in the area, because there was no gas facility present in the

region. A large number of people were dependent upon the trees because they

used these woods for fire material.

The researcher found that overgrazing was also a major factor of flood in the

region. The inhabitants of Chitral rear cattles that destroy the greeneries and

cause soil erosion due to which flood happened. In summer the glacier melt

and cause flood in the area.Flood was the mostly occurring natural hazard of

the area, placed a very bad impacts on the economic activities of people. It

destroyed the crops, cultivated land, ruined the houses, washed away the fruit

trees and buildings. Their businesses were affected by the flood. Roads,

hospitals, schools, offices, drinking water supply, electricity and agriculture

system were affected. They spent their money and time in the rehabilitation of

the destruction, due to which their economic activities suffered badly. Most of

their time consumed in the rebuilding of the houses. Due to the blockage of

road the transport system disturbs and people can’t reach their work places in
the other areas due to which they can’t get their salaries at time and their

economic condition become weak. They area cut off from the other regions

the supply of different material for the business stooped and result in business

loss. Fruit business disturbed because the flood harmed the trees of the area.

The inhabitants time waste in the plantation of new trees. Shops and farms

have to shut down for several days or permanently during flood. This was

concluded that the flood badly affected the economic activities of people in

Booni Chitral. .
REFERENCES

Ali, Akhtar. 2013. “Indus basin flood mechanisms, impacts, and

management.” Asian development bank.

Below, Regina, 2006.“EM-DAT international disaster database.”Center for

research on the Epidemiology of disasters-CRED.

Daanish, Mustafa., Jams L. Wescoat Jr. 1997. “Development of Flood

Hazards Policy in the Indus River Basin of Pakistan.”Water International

22(4):238-244

Dixon, RebessaA., Ambassador Teresta Schaffer. 2010. “Pakistan flood:

internally displaced people and human impact.” center for strategic and

international studies.

Dutta, Dushmanta., SrikanthaHerath., and KatumiMusiake. 2003. “A

mathematical model for flood loss estimation” Journal of hydrology

(227): 24-49.

Haddad, Eduaro A.,Eliane Teixeira. 2013. “Economic impacts of natural

disasters in megacities: the case of floods in São Paulo, Brazil.” The

university of Sao Paulo regional and Urban Economics lab.

Hashmi, Hashim N.,QAzi Tallat Mahmood Siddiqui, Abdul

RazzaqGhumman,Mumtaz, Ahmad Kamal and Habib ur


RehmanMughal. 2012. “A critical analysis of 2010 floods in

Pakistan.” American journal of agricultural research 7 (7):1054-1067.

Hoyois, Philippe.,ReginaBelow, and DebaratiGuha-Sapir. 2005."International

Federation of Red Cross and RedCrescent Societies.

http://education.nationalgeographic.com/education/encyclopedia

Jonkman, S N. 2005.“Global perspective on loss of human life caused by

flood.”Natural Hazard (34):151-175.

Jonkman, S.N., M. Bakarjova, M. Kok, and P.Bernardini. 2008. “Integrated

hydrodynamic and economic modeling of flood damage in

Netherland.” Ecological economics (66):77-90.

Khan, M. A., M. Haneef, Anwar S. Khan and TAzeemTahirkheli. 2013.

“Debris-flow hazard on tributary junction Fans, Chitral, Hindu Kush

range, northern Pakistan.” Asian earth science (62):720-733.

Kimberley, Nash. 2012. “Flood' defined in Insurance Contracts Regulations.”

Insurance Contracts Regulations.

Kozlowski, Theodore T. 1984. “Extent, causes, and impacts of

flooding”. Flooding and plant growth 1-7.


Mendelsohn, R., Nordhaus, W. D, and Shaw D. 1994. “The impact of global

warming on agriculture: a Ricardian analysis. “The American

economic review753-771.

Mwape, Yande P. 2009. “An impact of floods on the socio-economic

livelihood of people: A case study of Skaunzwe community in Kazungula

district of Zambia.”

N Milli,Acharjee ., Konwar M. 2013. “Impact of flood and river bank erosion

on socio-economy: a case study of Golaghat revenue circle of

Golaghat district Assam” International Journal of Geology, Earth &

Environmental Sciences 2277 -2081.

National, Weather Service Morristown. 2012. National Geographic Education

Opondo, Denis O. 2013. “Erosive coping after the 2011 floods in

Kenya.”Int J. Global Warming, vol. no.5, No.4.

Parker, Dennis J. 1978. “Flood in megacities: increasing exposure and rising

impact potential.” Hazard in the built environment1(21):753-771.

Pelling, M., Alpaslan Özerdem, and SultanBarakat. 2002. “The macro-

economic impact of disasters.” Progress in Development Studies, 2(4), 283-

305.
Rahman, Atta U., Amir Nawaz Khan. 2013. “Analysis of 2010-flood causes,

nature and magnitude in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.” Nat

Hazards 66:887-904.

Richardson, S. D. and Reynolds, J. M. 2000.“An overview of glacial hazards

in the Himalayas.” Quaternary International (65):31-47.

Robinson, Dennis P. 2010. “Regional economic impact of 2008 Cedars rapids

flood.”

Sammson, Wakuma., Abaya, Nicodemus Mandere and Göran Ewald.2009.

“Floods and Health in Gambella Region, Ethiopia: a Qualitative

Assessment of the Strengths and Weaknesses of Coping Mechanisms.”

Global Health Action 1-19.

Shing, Cheng Y. 1992. “The Economic Impact of the Summer Floods.”

China Review 8.1-8.25.

Sturgis, Samuel. D. 1957.“Floods.” Annals of the American Academy of

Political and Social Science, Disasters and Disaster Relief 1(309):15-22.

Tariq, Muhammad A. 2013.“Risk based flood zoning employing expected

annual damages: the Chenab river case study.” Stoch Environ Res Risk

assesses (27):1957-1966.
Veen, Anne V. and ChristiaanLogtmeijer. 2005. “Economic hotspots:

visualizing vulnerability to flooding.” Natural hazards 36: 65-80.

World disasters report.” Center for Research on the Epidemiology of

DisastersCatholic University of Louvain.

Yin, Hongfu. and Changan Li. 2001. “Human impact on floods and disasters

on the Yangtze river.”Geomorphology (41):105-109.

Zahiruddin. 2014. “Flood inundates several villages in Chitral.” Dawn.


Demographic Information

• Name of Respondent…………………………………………………

• Gender

a. Male b. Female

• Age of Respondent

• 18-28 b. 29-39 c. 40-50 d. 51-61 e. Above


61

• Family Type

• Nuclear b. Joint c. Extended

• Number of Family Member

• 2-5 b. 6-9 c. 10-13 d. 14-17 e. Above


17

• Marital Status

a. Single b. Married c. Divorce d. Separated e. Widow


f. Widower

• Monthly Family Income (Pakistani Rs)

a.10, 001-20,000 b. 20,001-30,000 c. 30,001-40,000 d.


40,001 and above

8. Academic Qualification

a. Illiterate b. Primary c. Middle d. Secondary e.


Intermediate

f. Bachelor g. Masters and above


9. Occupation

a. Agriculture b. Government Servant c. Private Job


d.Self Business

Note: Chose the appropriate option again all statements.

1=Yes 2=No 3=Don’t Know

Independent Variable (Flood)

Q Don’t
Statement Yes No
No. Know

10 Does Flood occur most frequently in your area from the past five
1 2 3
years?

Do you think flood is the most disastrous hazard in your area? 1 2 3


11
Do you think Heavy rain fall is a factor of flood in Buni, Chitral? 1 2 3

12 Does heavy melting of glacier leads to flood in your area? 1 2 3


13 Do you think that mostly flood occur due mountainous structure of
1 2 3
land in your village?

14 Is deforestation a cause of flood in the region? 1 2 3


15 Do you consider flood as natural phenomena? 1 2 3
16 Do you perceive flood as result of misdeed of people? 1 2 3
17 Flood occurs only in summer season in your area? 1 2 3
21 Does Over grazing pave the path for flood in your village? 1 2 3

Economic Activities (Dependent Variable)


Q Don’t
Statement Yes No
No Know
23 Do you think that Flood Affect the cultivation process of farmer in
1 2 3
the region?

24 Do you agree that most of your time consumes in rehabilitation of


1 2 3
flood affected land?

25 Does Flood affect the irrigation system of the region? 1 2 3

26 Does flood destroy the crop in summer season? 1 2 3

27 Do you think that flood destroy the fruit trees which effect the dry
1 2 3
fruit business?
28 Has Cultivated land been affected by heavy flood in your region? 1 2 3

29 Has Flood also destroyed livestock in your village? 1 2 3

30 Do breakages of road disturb economic activities during flood? 1 2 3

31 Did Flood ruin the houses of the people in your area? 1 2 3

32 Have Government buildings like schools, offices, hospitals etc been


1 2 3
affected by flood in your local.
33 Are Business losses also outcomes of flood in the region? 1 2 3

34 Does break down of electricity suffer economic activities of people


1 2 3
during flood?
35 Do people spend most of their money and time for rehabilitation of
1 2 3
drinking water supply after flood destruction?
36 Do you ever think that flood ever gave advantage to plants and
1 2 3
animals?

37 Do you think that flood cleans the environment? 1 2 3

You might also like