Structural functionalism views society as made up of interdependent parts that work together, conflict theory sees society as groups competing for resources and power which can lead to positive change, and symbolic interactionism focuses on how shared symbols and meanings allow for the creation of society through interpretation during social interactions.
Structural functionalism views society as made up of interdependent parts that work together, conflict theory sees society as groups competing for resources and power which can lead to positive change, and symbolic interactionism focuses on how shared symbols and meanings allow for the creation of society through interpretation during social interactions.
Structural functionalism views society as made up of interdependent parts that work together, conflict theory sees society as groups competing for resources and power which can lead to positive change, and symbolic interactionism focuses on how shared symbols and meanings allow for the creation of society through interpretation during social interactions.
STRUCTURAL FUNCTIONALISM - says that the society is made possible due
to cooperation and independence - with this point of view, the society is given parts and those parts has been given a function for the society to perform CONFLICT THEORY - Marxist-inspired perspective - Sees society as an arena - Social actors are seen as gladiators who fights for their lives and the winner takes freedom - Sees conflict as a positive or advantageous - Because of this, conflict makes change and dynamism possible - It sets out new set of relations and interactions which produces new dynamism in the society - This theory invokes social processes rather than functions or independences SYMBOLIC INTERACTION - Explores on meaning making - The interpretation of symbols may have a reality making effect on people implicated in the interaction situation - Because of symbols and meanings, society is possible