[2023-1] English Practice: English Debate Championship

Prof. Youngran An

★Debating Practice & Debate Championship_Mapo High School

Evaluation Sheet

Date:
Score
Topic:
Pro Con
Criteria

◦ The person/team understood the issue of the

Argument debate and stated the argument in a succinct
(15) way.
2 min. ◦ The basis of argument is well grounded and
original.
◦ The person/team comprehended what the other
team argued for, and refuted the argument
Refutation 1 logically without contradiction.
(15) ◦ It helped to grasp what the other team was
3 min. maintaining.
◦ It coherently connected the team’s argument
and the supporting pieces of evidence.
◦ The person/team analyzed what the other team
argued for and presented remaining refutation in
a logical way.
◦ The person/team did not present his or its own
Refutation 2
opinion solely, but he or it convinced the
(15)
audience by refuting the other team’s points of
3 min.
argument.
◦ The person/team responded to the other team’s
inquiries or doubts, by providing appropriate
evidence or data.
◦ The person/team summarized the major
Final Remarks
argument with essential points, in a brief and
(15)
clear fashion.
2 min.
◦ The person/team reinforced what had not been

1
[2023-1] English Practice: English Debate Championship
Prof. Youngran An

covered in the refutations and brought into relief

his/its own final conclusion effectively.
◦ The team clearly understood what the question
P.O.I.
was asking.
(10)
◦ The team gave a good answer with logic to the
à Judges’ Qs
question.
◦ Use of appropriate and relevant terms for the
Language sake of understanding the issue of debate
(10)
◦ Enunciation

Attitude
◦ Respect for the judges and for the other team
Things in (5)
common
Rule
(30)
Compliance ◦ Time management
(5)
◦ No opposing views among the members
Teamwork
◦ Cooperation and consideration among the
(10)
members

Judge: (signature) TOTAL