0116 - Dimension in SuperHyperGraphs

Dimension In
SuperHyperGraphs
Ideas | Approaches | Accessibility | Availability
Dr. Henry Garrett

Report | Exposition | References | Research #22 2023
Contents
Contents iii
List of Figures vi
List of Tables xi
1 ABSTRACT 1
2 Background 11
Bibliography 15
3 Acknowledgements 25
4 Cancer In Extreme SuperHyperGraph 27
5 Extreme SuperHyperDimension 31
6 New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of SuperHyperDi-

mension In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph 33
7 ABSTRACT 35
8 Applied Notions Under The Scrutiny Of The Motivation Of This Scientific

Research 41
9 Extreme Preliminaries Of This Scientific Research On the Redeemed Ways 45
10 Extreme SuperHyperDimension But As The Extensions Excerpt From

Dense And Super Forms 55
11 The Extreme Departures on The Theoretical Results Toward Theoretical

Motivations 73
iii
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
12 The Surveys of Mathematical Sets On The Results But As The Initial

Motivation 83
13 Extreme Applications in Cancer’s Extreme Recognition 95
14 Case 1: The Initial Extreme Steps Toward Extreme SuperHyperBipartite

as Extreme SuperHyperModel 97
15 Case 2: The Increasing Extreme Steps Toward Extreme SuperHyperMul-

tipartite as Extreme SuperHyperModel 99
16 Wondering Open Problems But As The Directions To Forming The

Motivations 101
17 Conclusion and Closing Remarks 103
18 ExtremeSuperHyperDuality But As The Extensions Excerpt From Dense

And Super Forms 105
19 ExtremeSuperHyperJoin But As The Extensions Excerpt From Dense

And Super Forms 119
20 ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect But As The Extensions Excerpt From Dense

And Super Forms 133
21 ExtremeSuperHyperTotal But As The Extensions Excerpt From Dense

And Super Forms 147
22 ExtremeSuperHyperConnected But As The Extensions Excerpt From

23 Background 175
Bibliography 179
24 Cancer In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 189
25 Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension 193
26 New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph

By SuperHyperDimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super Distances 195
27 ABSTRACT 197
28 Applied Notions Under The Scrutiny Of The Motivation Of This Scientific

Research 203
29 Neutrosophic Preliminaries Of This Scientific Research On the Redeemed

Ways 207

30 Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension But As The Extensions Excerpt

From Dense And Super Forms 217
31 The Neutrosophic Departures on The Theoretical Results Toward Theor-

etical Motivations 235
32 The Surveys of Mathematical Sets On The Results But As The Initial

Motivation 245
33 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 257
34 Case 1: The Initial Neutrosophic Steps Toward Neutrosophic SuperHy-

perBipartite as Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 259
35 Case 2: The Increasing Neutrosophic Steps Toward Neutrosophic Super-

HyperMultipartite as Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 261
36 Wondering Open Problems But As The Directions To Forming The

Motivations 263
37 Conclusion and Closing Remarks 265
38 Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality But As The Extensions Excerpt From

39 Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin But As The Extensions Excerpt From

40 Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect But As The Extensions Excerpt From

41 Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal But As The Extensions Excerpt From

42 Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected But As The Extensions Excerpt

From Dense And Super Forms 323
43 Background 337
Bibliography 341
44 Books’ Contributions 351
45 “SuperHyperGraph-Based Books”: | Featured Tweets 361
46 CV 389

List of Figures
10.1 The Extreme SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Extreme Notions of Extreme

SuperHyperDimension in the Extreme Example (42.0.3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
10.10The Extreme SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Extreme Notions of Extreme
vi

11.1 a Extreme SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of Extreme SuperHyperDi-

mension in the Example (42.0.5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
11.2 a Extreme SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Extreme Notions of Extreme
11.3 a Extreme SuperHyperStar Associated to the Extreme Notions of Extreme
11.4 Extreme SuperHyperBipartite Extreme Associated to the Extreme Notions of Extreme
SuperHyperDimension in the Example (42.0.11) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
11.5 a Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of Extreme SuperHy-
perDimension in the Example (42.0.13) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
11.6 a Extreme SuperHyperWheel Extreme Associated to the Extreme Notions of Extreme
SuperHyperDimension in the Extreme Example (42.0.15) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
14.1 a Extreme SuperHyperBipartite Associated to the Notions of Extreme SuperHyper-

Dimension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
15.1 a Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of Extreme SuperHy-

perDimension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
30.1 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (42.0.3) . . . . . 218


30.10The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
31.1 a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of Neutrosophic

SuperHyperDimension in the Example (42.0.5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236
31.2 a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
31.3 a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of Neutro-
sophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (42.0.9) . . . . . . . . . 239
31.4 Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutrosophic
Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Example (42.0.11) . . . . . . 241
31.5 a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperDimension in the Example (42.0.13) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242
31.6 a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutrosophic
Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (42.0.15) 243
34.1 a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutrosophic

SuperHyperDimension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 259

35.1 a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutrosophic

SuperHyperDimension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 261
44.1 Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of SuperHy-
perDimension In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”,
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15179.67361). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 352
44.4 Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHy-
perGraph By SuperHyperDimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super Distances”,
44.8 “#116th Book” || Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs February 2023 License: CC
BY-NC-ND 4.0 Project: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs . 358
44.9 “#116th Book” || Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs February 2023 License: CC
44.10“#116th Book” || Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs February 2023 License: CC
45.1 “SuperHyperGraph-Based Books”: | Featured Tweets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 362

45.2 “SuperHyperGraph-Based Books”: | Featured Tweets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 363
45.3 “SuperHyperGraph-Based Books”: | Featured Tweets #69 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 364
45.10“SuperHyperGraph-Based Books”: | Featured Tweets #67 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 370



List of Tables
9.1 The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges

Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition (29.0.23) 54
Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition (29.0.22) 54

Belong to The Extreme SuperHyperBipartite . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98

Belong to The Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
17.1 An Overlook On This Research And Beyond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104

Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition (29.0.22) 216

Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 260

Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262
37.1 An Overlook On This Research And Beyond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 266
xi
CHAPTER 1
ABSTRACT
In this scientific research book, there are some scientific research chapters on “Extreme Dimension 1
In SuperHyperGraphs” and “Neutrosophic Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs” about some 2
scientific research on Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs by two (Extreme/Neutrosophic) notions, 3

namely, Extreme Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic Dimension In SuperHy- 4
perGraphs. With scientific research on the basic scientific research properties, the scientific 5
research book starts to make Extreme Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs theory and Neutrosophic 6
Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs theory more (Extremely/Neutrosophicly) understandable. 7
8
In the some chapters, in some researches, new setting is introduced for new SuperHyperNotions, 9
namely, a Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs . 10
Two different types of SuperHyperDefinitions are debut for them but the scientific research goes 11
further and the SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and SuperHyperClass based on that 12
are well-defined and well-reviewed. The literature review is implemented in the whole of this 13
research. For shining the elegancy and the significancy of this research, the comparison between 14
this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are 15

featured. The definitions are followed by the examples and the instances thus the clarifications are 16
driven with different tools. The applications are figured out to make sense about the theoretical 17
aspect of this ongoing research. The “Cancer’s Recognition” are the under scientific research to 18
figure out the challenges make sense about ongoing and upcoming research. The special case is up. 19
The cells are viewed in the deemed ways. There are different types of them. Some of them are 20
individuals and some of them are well-modeled by the group of cells. These types are all officially 21
called “SuperHyperVertex” but the relations amid them all officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. 22
The frameworks “SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” are chosen and 23
elected to scientific research about “Cancer’s Recognition”. Thus these complex and dense Super- 24
HyperModels open up some avenues to scientific research on theoretical segments and “Cancer’s 25
Recognition”. Some avenues are posed to pursue this research. It’s also officially collected in the 26
form of some questions and some problems. Assume a SuperHyperGraph. Then δ−Dimension In 27
SuperHyperGraphs is a maximal of SuperHyperVertices with a maximum cardinality such that 28
either of the following expressions hold for the (Neutrosophic) cardinalities of SuperHyperNeigh- 29
bors of s ∈ S : there are |S ∩ N (s)| > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ; and |S ∩ N (s)| < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ. 30
The first Expression, holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And the second Expression, 31
holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperDefensive; a Neutrosophic δ−Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs 32
is a maximal Neutrosophic of SuperHyperVertices with maximum Neutrosophic cardinality 33
1
such that either of the following expressions hold for the Neutrosophic cardinalities of Super- 34
HyperNeighbors of s ∈ S there are: |S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ; 35
and |S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ. The first Expression, holds 36
if S is a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And the second Expression, holds if S is 37
a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperDefensive It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of a 38
Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs . Since there’s more ways to get type-results to make a 39
Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs more understandable. For the sake of having Neutrosophic 40

Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs, there’s a need to “redefine” the notion of a “Dimension In 41
SuperHyperGraphs ”. The SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the 42
labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position 43
of labels to assign to the values. Assume a Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs . It’s redefined 44
a Neutrosophic Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs if the mentioned Table holds, concerning, 45
“The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges Belong 46

to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with the key points, “The Values of The Vertices 47
& The Number of Position in Alphabet”, “The Values of The SuperVertices&The maximum 48
Values of Its Vertices”, “The Values of The Edges&The maximum Values of Its Vertices”, 49
“The Values of The HyperEdges&The maximum Values of Its Vertices”, “The Values of The 50
SuperHyperEdges&The maximum Values of Its Endpoints”. To get structural examples and 51
instances, I’m going to introduce the next SuperHyperClass of SuperHyperGraph based on a 52

Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs . It’s the main. It’ll be disciplinary to have the foundation 53
of previous definition in the kind of SuperHyperClass. If there’s a need to have all Dimension 54
In SuperHyperGraphs until the Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs, then it’s officially called a 55
“Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs” but otherwise, it isn’t a Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs . 56
There are some instances about the clarifications for the main definition titled a “Dimension 57
In SuperHyperGraphs ”. These two examples get more scrutiny and discernment since there 58
are characterized in the disciplinary ways of the SuperHyperClass based on a Dimension In 59
SuperHyperGraphs . For the sake of having a Neutrosophic Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs, 60
there’s a need to “redefine” the notion of a “Neutrosophic Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs” 61
and a “Neutrosophic Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs ”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 62
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, 63
there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. Assume a Neutrosophic 64
SuperHyperGraph. It’s redefined “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” if the intended Table 65
holds. And a Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs are redefined to a “Neutrosophic Dimension In 66
SuperHyperGraphs” if the intended Table holds. It’s useful to define “Neutrosophic” version 67
of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s more ways to get Neutrosophic type-results to make a 68
Neutrosophic Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs more understandable. Assume a Neutrosophic 69

SuperHyperGraph. There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the intended Table holds. 70
Thus SuperHyperPath, Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs, SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, 71
SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are “Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, “Neut- 72
rosophic Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic 73
SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite”, and “Neutrosophic SuperHy- 74
perWheel” if the intended Table holds. A SuperHyperGraph has a “Neutrosophic Dimension 75

In SuperHyperGraphs” where it’s the strongest [the maximum Neutrosophic value from all 76
the Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs amid the maximum value amid all SuperHyperVertices 77
from a Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs .] Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs . A graph is a 78
SuperHyperUniform if it’s a SuperHyperGraph and the number of elements of SuperHyperEdges 79

are the same. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some SuperHyperClasses 80
as follows. It’s SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given 81
SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; it’s Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs if it’s only one 82
SuperVertex as intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one 83
SuperVertex as intersection amid all SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one 84
SuperVertex as intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming 85
two separate sets, has no SuperHyperEdge in common; it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only 86
one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, 87
forming multi separate sets, has no SuperHyperEdge in common; it’s a SuperHyperWheel if it’s 88
only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex 89
has one SuperHyperEdge with any common SuperVertex. The SuperHyperModel proposes 90
the specific designs and the specific architectures. The SuperHyperModel is officially called 91
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, The 92

“specific” cells and “specific group” of cells are SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperVertices” 93
and the common and intended properties between “specific” cells and “specific group” of cells 94
are SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. Sometimes, it’s useful to have some degrees of 95
determinacy, indeterminacy, and neutrality to have more precise SuperHyperModel which in this 96
case the SuperHyperModel is called “Neutrosophic”. In the future research, the foundation will 97
be based on the “Cancer’s Recognition” and the results and the definitions will be introduced in 98
redeemed ways. The recognition of the cancer in the long-term function. The specific region 99
has been assigned by the model [it’s called SuperHyperGraph] and the long cycle of the move 100
from the cancer is identified by this research. Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be 101
easily identified since there are some determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves 102
and the effects of the cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s 103
said to be Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s happened 104

and what’s done. There are some specific models, which are well-known and they’ve got the 105
names, and some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The moves and the traces of the 106
cancer on the complex tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by 107
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs, SuperHyperStar, Supe- 108
rHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to find either the 109
longest Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs or the strongest Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs 110

in those Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. For the longest Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs, 111
called Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs, and the strongest Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs, 112
called Neutrosophic Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs, some general results are introduced. 113
Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all possible SuperHyperPaths have only two SuperHyperEdges 114
but it’s not enough since it’s essential to have at least three SuperHyperEdges to form any 115
style of a Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs. There isn’t any formation of any Dimension In 116
SuperHyperGraphs but literarily, it’s the deformation of any Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs. 117
It, literarily, deforms and it doesn’t form. A basic familiarity with SuperHyperGraph theory and 118
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory are proposed. 119
Keywords: SuperHyperGraph, (Neutrosophic) Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs, Cancer’s 120
Recognition 121
AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 122
123
In the some chapters, in some researches, new setting is introduced for new SuperHyper- 124

Notion, namely, Neutrosophic Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs . Two different types of 125

SuperHyperDefinitions are debut for them but the scientific research goes further and the 126
SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and SuperHyperClass based on that are well-defined 127
and well-reviewed. The literature review is implemented in the whole of this research. For shining 128
the elegancy and the significancy of this research, the comparison between this SuperHyperNo- 129
tion with other SuperHyperNotions and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are featured. The 130
definitions are followed by the examples and the instances thus the clarifications are driven with 131
different tools. The applications are figured out to make sense about the theoretical aspect of 132
this ongoing research. The “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition” are the under scientific research 133
to figure out the challenges make sense about ongoing and upcoming research. The special case 134
is up. The cells are viewed in the deemed ways. There are different types of them. Some of 135
them are individuals and some of them are well-modeled by the group of cells. These types 136
are all officially called “SuperHyperVertex” but the relations amid them all officially called 137
“SuperHyperEdge”. The frameworks “SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” 138
are chosen and elected to scientific research about “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition”. Thus 139
these complex and dense SuperHyperModels open up some avenues to scientific research on 140
theoretical segments and “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition”. Some avenues are posed to pursue 141
this research. It’s also officially collected in the form of some questions and some problems. 142
Assume a SuperHyperGraph. Then an “δ−Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs” is a maximal 143

Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs of SuperHyperVertices with maximum cardinality such that 144
either of the following expressions hold for the (Neutrosophic) cardinalities of SuperHyper- 145
Neighbors of s ∈ S : |S ∩ N (s)| > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ, |S ∩ N (s)| < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ. 146
The first Expression, holds if S is an “δ−SuperHyperOffensive”. And the second Expression, 147
holds if S is an “δ−SuperHyperDefensive”; a“Neutrosophic δ−Dimension In SuperHyper- 148
Graphs” is a maximal Neutrosophic Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs of SuperHyperVertices 149

with maximum Neutrosophic cardinality such that either of the following expressions hold for 150
the Neutrosophic cardinalities of SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : |S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic > 151
|S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ, |S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ. The first 152
Expression, holds if S is a “Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperOffensive”. And the second Expression, 153
holds if S is a “Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperDefensive”. It’s useful to define “Neutrosophic” 154
version of Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs . Since there’s more ways to get type-results to make 155
Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs more understandable. For the sake of having Neutrosophic 156
Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs, there’s a need to “redefine” the notion of “Dimension In 157
SuperHyperGraphs ”. The SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the 158
labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position 159
of labels to assign to the values. Assume a Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs . It’s redefined 160
Neutrosophic Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs if the mentioned Table holds, concerning, “The 161
Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges Belong to The 162
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with the key points, “The Values of The Vertices & The 163
Number of Position in Alphabet”, “The Values of The SuperVertices&The maximum Values of Its 164
Vertices”, “The Values of The Edges&The maximum Values of Its Vertices”, “The Values of The 165
HyperEdges&The maximum Values of Its Vertices”, “The Values of The SuperHyperEdges&The 166
maximum Values of Its Endpoints”. To get structural examples and instances, I’m going to intro- 167
duce the next SuperHyperClass of SuperHyperGraph based on Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs 168
. It’s the main. It’ll be disciplinary to have the foundation of previous definition in the kind 169
of SuperHyperClass. If there’s a need to have all Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs until the 170

Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs, then it’s officially called “Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs” 171

but otherwise, it isn’t Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs . There are some instances about the 172
clarifications for the main definition titled “Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs ”. These two 173
examples get more scrutiny and discernment since there are characterized in the disciplinary 174
ways of the SuperHyperClass based on Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs . For the sake of having 175
Neutrosophic Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs, there’s a need to “redefine” the notion of “Neut- 176
rosophic Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs” and “Neutrosophic Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs 177

”. The SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of 178
the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 179
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s redefined “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” if 180
the intended Table holds. And Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs are redefined “Neutrosophic 181
Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs” if the intended Table holds. It’s useful to define “Neutrosophic” 182
version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s more ways to get Neutrosophic type-results to make 183
Neutrosophic Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs more understandable. Assume a Neutrosophic 184
SuperHyperGraph. There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the intended Table holds. 185
Thus SuperHyperPath, Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs, SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, 186
SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are “Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, “Neut- 187
rosophic Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic 188
SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite”, and “Neutrosophic SuperHy- 189

perWheel” if the intended Table holds. A SuperHyperGraph has “Neutrosophic Dimension 190
In SuperHyperGraphs” where it’s the strongest [the maximum Neutrosophic value from all 191
Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs amid the maximum value amid all SuperHyperVertices from 192
a Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs .] Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs . A graph is Super- 193
HyperUniform if it’s SuperHyperGraph and the number of elements of SuperHyperEdges are 194
the same. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some SuperHyperClasses 195
as follows. It’s SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given 196
SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; it’s Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs if it’s only one 197
SuperVertex as intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one 198
SuperVertex as intersection amid all SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one 199
SuperVertex as intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming 200
two separate sets, has no SuperHyperEdge in common; it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only 201
one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, 202
forming multi separate sets, has no SuperHyperEdge in common; it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s 203
be based on the “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition” and the results and the definitions will 213
be introduced in redeemed ways. The Neutrosophic recognition of the cancer in the long-term 214
function. The specific region has been assigned by the model [it’s called SuperHyperGraph] 215
and the long cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this research. Sometimes the 216

move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some determinacy, indeterminacy 217
and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the cancer on that region; this event leads 218
us to choose another model [it’s said to be Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient 219
perception on what’s happened and what’s done. There are some specific models, which are 220
well-known and they’ve got the names, and some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The 221
moves and the traces of the cancer on the complex tracks and between complicated groups of 222
cells could be fantasized by a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs, 223

SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim 224
is to find either the longest Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs or the strongest Dimension In 225
SuperHyperGraphs in those Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. For the longest Dimension In 226
SuperHyperGraphs, called Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs, and the strongest Dimension In 227
SuperHyperGraphs, called Neutrosophic Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs, some general results 228
are introduced. Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all possible SuperHyperPaths have only two 229
SuperHyperEdges but it’s not enough since it’s essential to have at least three SuperHyperEdges to 230
form any style of a Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs. There isn’t any formation of any Dimension 231
In SuperHyperGraphs but literarily, it’s the deformation of any Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs. 232
It, literarily, deforms and it doesn’t form. A basic familiarity with SuperHyperGraph theory and 233
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory are proposed. 234
Keywords: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Neutrosophic Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs, 235
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 236

238
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are proposed 239
as book in the following by Henry Garrett (2022) which is indexed by Google Scholar and has 240
more than 3181 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs” and published by 241
Ohio: E-publishing: Educational Publisher 1091 West 1st Ave Grandview Heights, Ohio 43212 242
United State. This research book covers different types of notions and settings in neutrosophic 243
graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. 244
245
246
[Ref] Henry Garrett, (2022). “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”, Ohio: E-publishing: Educa- 247
tional Publisher 1091 West 1st Ave Grandview Heights, Ohio 43212 United States. ISBN: 248
978-1-59973-725-6 (http://fs.unm.edu/BeyondNeutrosophicGraphs.pdf). 249

[Ref] Henry Garrett, (2022). “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”, Ohio: E-publishing: Educational 250
Publisher 1091 West 1st Ave Grandview Heights, Ohio 43212 United States. ISBN: 978-1-59973- 251
725-6 (http://fs.unm.edu/BeyondNeutrosophicGraphs.pdf). 252
253
Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are pro- 254
posed as book in the following by Henry Garrett (2022) which is indexed by Google Scholar 255
and has more than 4060 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” and published by 256
Florida: GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE - Publishing House 848 Brickell Ave Ste 950 Miami, Florida 257
33131 United States. This research book presents different types of notions SuperHyperResolving 258
and Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs in the setting of duality in neutrosophic graph theory and 259
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This research book has scrutiny on the complement of 260
the intended set and the intended set, simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on 261

its complement that what’s done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high 262
readers in Scribd. 263
[Ref] Henry Garrett, (2022). “Neutrosophic Duality”, Florida: GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE - 264
Publishing House 848 Brickell Ave Ste 950 Miami, Florida 33131 United States. ISBN: 978-1- 265
59973-743-0 (http://fs.unm.edu/NeutrosophicDuality.pdf). 266
[Ref] Henry Garrett, (2022). “Neutrosophic Duality”, Florida: GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE 267
- Publishing House 848 Brickell Ave Ste 950 Miami, Florida 33131 United States. ISBN: 268
978-1-59973-743-0 (http://fs.unm.edu/NeutrosophicDuality.pdf). 269



CHAPTER 2 270
Background 271
There are some scientific researches covering the topic of this research. In what follows, there are 272
some discussion and literature reviews about them date back on February 19, 2023. 273
First article is titled “properties of SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” in 274

Ref. [HG1] by Henry Garrett (2022). It’s first step toward the research on neutrosophic Super- 275
HyperGraphs. This research article is published on the journal “Neutrosophic Sets and Systems” 276
in issue 49 and the pages 531-561. In this research article, different types of notions like dom- 277
inating, resolving, coloring, Eulerian(Hamiltonian) neutrosophic path, n-Eulerian(Hamiltonian) 278
neutrosophic path, zero forcing number, zero forcing neutrosophic- number, independent number, 279
independent neutrosophic-number, clique number, clique neutrosophic-number, matching number, 280

matching neutrosophic-number, girth, neutrosophic girth, 1-zero-forcing number, 1-zero- forcing 281
neutrosophic-number, failed 1-zero-forcing number, failed 1-zero-forcing neutrosophic-number, 282
global- offensive alliance, t-offensive alliance, t-defensive alliance, t-powerful alliance, and global- 283
powerful alliance are defined in SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Some 284
Classes of SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are cases of research. Some 285
results are applied in family of SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Thus this 286
research article has concentrated on the vast notions and introducing the majority of notions. 287
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “neutrosophic co-degree and neutrosophic 288
degree alongside chromatic numbers in the setting of some classes related to neutrosophic hy- 289
pergraphs” in Ref. [HG2] by Henry Garrett (2022). In this research article, a novel approach 290
is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on general 291
forms without using neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in 292
prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Current Trends in Computer Science Research 293
(JCTCSR)” with ISO abbreviation “J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in volume 1 and issue 1 with 294
pages 06-14. The research article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs instead 295
of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on 296
initial background. 297
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Super Hyper Dominating and Super 298
Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 299
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes” in Ref. [HG3] by Henry Garrett (2022). In this research 300
article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyper- 301
Graph based on fundamental SuperHyperNumber and using neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses 302
of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 303
“Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO 304
11
abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 1 and issue 3 with pages 242-263. 305
The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and 306
SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background 307
and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 308
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super 309
Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside Applica- 310
tions in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [HG133] by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, 311
a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based 312
on fundamental notions and using vital tools in Cancer’s Treatments. It’s published in prestigious 313
and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathem- 314
atics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 2 and 315
issue 1 with pages 35-47. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 316
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results 317
based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 318
In some articles are titled “0039 | Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as (Dual)Resolving 319
and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in (Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. 320
[HG4] by Henry Garrett (2022), “0049 | (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs” 321
in Ref. [HG5] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme 322
of Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of (Neutrosophic) 323
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [HG6] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Uncertainty On The Act And 324
Effect Of Cancer Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHy- 325
perClique inside Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition” in Ref. [HG7] 326
by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 327
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [HG8] by Henry Garrett (2022), 328
“The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and Affected Cells Toward The Totality 329
Under Cancer’s Recognition By New Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside 330
Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 331
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [HG9] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Con- 332
tinuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed 333
SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in 334
Ref. [HG10] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors 335
on the Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in Neutrosophic 336
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [HG11] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extremism of the Attacked 337
Body Under the Cancer’s Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 338
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [HG12] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed Super- 339
HyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [HG13] 340

by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 341
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. 342
[HG14] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHy- 343
perFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 344
And Beyond” in Ref. [HG15] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on 345
Cancer’s Recognition by Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs ” in Ref. 346

[HG16] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neut- 347
rosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 348
in Ref. [HG12] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperFor- 349
cing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) 350

SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [HG17] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style 351

SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic 352
Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [HG18] by Henry Garrett (2022),“(Neutrosophic) 353
SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive 354
SuperHyperAlliances” in Ref. [HG19] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHy- 355
perAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On 356
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Re- 357

cognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [HG20] by Henry Garrett 358
(2022), “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Su- 359
perHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions” in Ref. [HG21] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Some 360
SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and Super- 361
HyperGraphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [HG22] by Henry Garrett 362
(2022), “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 363

And Their Directions in Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [HG23] 364
by Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To Monitor 365
Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [HG24] by Henry Garrett 366
(2023), “The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The Cancer’s Extreme 367
Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching Set and Polynomial on 368
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [HG25] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Extreme Failed 369
SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections 370
of Cancer’s Attacks By SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. 371
[HG26] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In 372
Front of Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s 373
Recognition called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [HG27] by Henry Garrett (2023), 374
“Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Forwarding Neutro- 375
sophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [HG28] by Henry Garrett 376
(2023), “Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded Regions and Sub-Regions in 377
the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) 378
SuperHyperClique” in Ref. [HG29] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Different Neutrosophic Types 379
of Neutrosophic Regions titled neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 380
Recognition modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [HG30] by 381

Henry Garrett (2023), “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To Super- 382
HyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [HG31] 383
[HG32] by Henry Garrett (2023), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition 386

by Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [HG33] by Henry 387
Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction To Use 388
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond” in Ref. 389
[HG34] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 390
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [HG35] by Henry Garrett (2022), 391
“Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling 392

in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [HG36] by Henry 393
Garrett (2022), “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating and Neutro- 394
sophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [HG37] by Henry Garrett (2022), 395
“Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some Neutrosophic Notions Based on 396

Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)” in Ref. 397

[HG38] by Henry Garrett (2022), there are some endeavors to formalize the basic SuperHyper- 398
Notions about neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. 399
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are proposed as book 400
in Ref. [HG39] by Henry Garrett (2022) which is indexed by Google Scholar and has more 401
than 3230 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs” and published by Ohio: 402
E-publishing: Educational Publisher 1091 West 1st Ave Grandview Heights, Ohio 43212 United 403
State. This research book covers different types of notions and settings in neutrosophic graph 404
theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. 405
Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are proposed 406
as book in Ref. [HG40] by Henry Garrett (2022) which is indexed by Google Scholar and has 407
more than 4117 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” and published by Florida: 408
GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE - Publishing House 848 Brickell Ave Ste 950 Miami, Florida 33131 409
United States. This research book presents different types of notions SuperHyperResolving and 410
SuperHyperDominating in the setting of duality in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic 411
SuperHyperGraph theory. This research book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set 412
and the intended set, simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement 413
that what’s done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 414
See the seminal scientific researches [HG1; HG2; HG3]. The formalization of the notions on the 415
framework of Extreme SuperHyperDominating, Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating theory, and 416
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs theory at [HG4; HG5; HG6; HG7; HG8; HG9; HG10; 417
HG11; HG12; HG13; HG14; HG15; HG16; HG17; HG18; HG19; HG20; HG21; HG22; 418
HG35; HG36; HG37; HG38; HG94; HG942; HG95; HG952; HG96; HG962; HG97; 420
HG972; HG98; HG982; HG106; HG107; HG111; HG112; HG115; HG116; HG120; 421
HG151; HG152; HG153; HG154; HG155; HG156; HG157; HG158; HG159; HG162]. 425
Two popular scientific research books in Scribd in the terms of high readers, 3230 and 4117 426
respectively, on neutrosophic science is on [HG39; HG40]. 427

– 428

Bibliography 429
HG1 [1] Henry Garrett, “Properties of SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 430
Graph”, Neutrosophic Sets and Systems 49 (2022) 531-561 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 431
odo.6456413). (http://fs.unm.edu/NSS/NeutrosophicSuperHyperGraph34.pdf). (ht- 432

tps://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nss_journal/vol49/iss1/34). 433
HG2 [2] Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Co-degree and Neutrosophic Degree alongside Chromatic 434
Numbers in the Setting of Some Classes Related to Neutrosophic Hypergraphs”, J Curr 435
Trends Comp Sci Res 1(1) (2022) 06-14. 436
HG3 [3] Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutro- 437
sophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and Neutrosophic 438
Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) (2022) 242-263. (doi: 439
10.33140/JMTCM.01.03.09) 440
HG133 [4] Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neut- 441
rosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside Applications 442
in Cancer’s Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) (2023) 35-47. 443
(https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/some-super-hyper-degrees-and- 444
cosuper-hyper-degrees-on-neutrosophic-super-hyper-graphs-and-super-hyper-graphs- 445
alongside-a.pdf) 446
HG4 [5] Garrett, Henry. “0039 | Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as (Dual)Resolving 447
and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in (Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph.” 448

CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN 449
European Organization for Nuclear Research, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6319942. 450
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 451
HG5 [6] Garrett, Henry. “0049 | (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs.” CERN 452
European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 2022. CERN European 453
Organization for Nuclear Research, https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. ht- 454
tps://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 455
HG6 [7] Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of Confrontation under 456
Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 457
Preprints 2023, 2023010308 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 458
15
HG7 [8] Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The Foggy 459
Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside Neutrosophic Supe- 460
rHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/pre- 461
prints202301.0282.v1). 462
HG8 [9] Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 463
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010267 (doi: 464
10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1). 465
HG9 [10] Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and Affected Cells 466
Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New Multiple Definitions On the Sets 467
Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based 468
on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 469
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 470
HG10 [11] Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The Worst Case of 471
Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s Recognition Applied 472
in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/pre- 473
prints202301.0262.v1). 474
HG11 [12] Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the Cancer’s 475
Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 476
Graphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 477
HG12 [13] Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s Circumstances Where 478
Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, 479
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 480
HG13 [14] Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions 481
And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/pre- 482
prints202301.0105.v1). 483
HG14 [15] Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 484
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints”, 485
HG15 [16] Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction To 487
Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond”, 488
Preprints 2023, 2023010044 489
HG16 [17] Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by Well- 490
SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010043 (doi: 491
10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 492
HG17 [18] Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) 493
SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 494

HG19 [20] Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions Featuring 499
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 2022, 2022120549 500
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 501
HG20 [21] Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive and 502
SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph With 503
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) 504

SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 505
HG21 [22] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 506
With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 507
10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 508
HG22 [23] Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on Neutrosophic 509
SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, 510
HG23 [24] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic Super- 512
HyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, 513
HG162 [25] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Contradiction By Hyper Detection of SuperHyper- 515
Defensive In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, 516
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13397.09446). 517
HG159 [26] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 518
By SuperHyperDominating As Hyper Closing On Super Messy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 519
10.13140/RG.2.2.21510.45125). 520
HG158 [27] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of SuperHyperDom- 521
inating In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 522
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13121.84321). 523
By SuperHyperConnected As Hyper Group On Super Surge”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 525

10.13140/RG.2.2.11758.69441). 526
HG156 [29] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of SuperHyperCon- 527
nected In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 528
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31891.35367). 529
By SuperHyperTotal As Hyper Covering On Super Infections”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 531
10.13140/RG.2.2.19360.87048). 532
HG154 [31] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of SuperHyperTotal 533
In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 534
10.13140/RG.2.2.32363.21286). 535

HG153 [32] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of SuperHyperPerfect 536
10.13140/RG.2.2.23266.81602). 538
By SuperHyperPerfect As Hyper Idealism On Super Vacancy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 540
10.13140/RG.2.2.19911.37285). 541
By SuperHyperJoin As Hyper Separations On Super Sorts”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 543
10.13140/RG.2.2.11050.90569). 544
HG150 [35] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of SuperHy- 545
perJoin In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 546
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17761.79206). 547
HG149 [36] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions Of SuperHy- 548
perDuality In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, 549
HG148 [37] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph By 551
SuperHyperDuality As Hyper Imaginations On Super Mixed-Illustrations”, ResearchGate 552
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33275.80161). 553
HG147 [38] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph 554
By Path SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Correction On Super Faults”, ResearchGate 2023, 555
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30182.50241). 556
HG146 [39] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Reflections By Hyper Rotations Of Path SuperHy- 557
perColoring In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, 558
HG145 [40] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Deformations On Super Chains In Cancer’s 560
Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDensity”, 561
HG144 [41] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Ignorance By SuperHyperDensity On Super 563
Resistances In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, 564
ResearchGate 2023, (doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.16800.05123). 565
HG143 [42] Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 566
Graph By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As Hyper Covering Versus 567
Super separations-VI”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482). 568
Super separations-V”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809). 571
Super separations-IV”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34946.96960). 574

HG140 [45] Henry Garrett, “A Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 575
By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As Hyper Covering Versus Super 576
separations-III”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14814.31040). 577
separations-II”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.17125). 580
separations-I”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.25719.50089). 583
HG137 [48] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Disruptions In Cancer’s Extreme Recognition 584
As Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By Hyper Plans Called SuperHyperConnectivities”, 585
HG136 [49] Henry Garrett, “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition As Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 587
By SuperHyperConnectivities As Hyper Diagnosis On Super Mechanism”, ResearchGate 588
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17252.24968). 589
HG135 [50] Henry Garrett,“Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph By the Criteria 590
of Eulerian and Hamiltonian Type-Sets As Hyper Modified Cycles On Super Mess”, 591
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16652.59525). 592
HG134 [51] Henry Garrett,“Eulerian and Hamiltonian In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and 593
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph On Super Interactions By Hyper Extensions of Cycles”, 594
HG133 [52] Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic 596
Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s 597
Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) (2023) 35-47. 598
HG132 [53] Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Type-Results on extreme SuperHyperGirth theory and 599
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs Toward Cancer’s extreme Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 600
2023010396 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 601
HG131 [54] Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Warns Hyper Landmark of neutrosophic 602
SuperHyperGirth In Super Type-Versions of Cancer’s neutrosophic Recognition”, Preprints 603

2023, 2023010395 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 604
HG130 [55] Henry Garrett,“The Constructions of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs on the Cancer’s 605
Recognition in The Confrontation With Super Attacks In Hyper Situations By Implementing 606
(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in The Technical Approaches to Neutralize 607
SuperHyperViews”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.26240.51204). 608
HG129 [56] Henry Garrett,“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing As the Entrepreneurs on 609

Cancer’s Recognitions To Fail Forcing Style As the Super Classes With Hyper Effects 610
In The Background of the Framework is So-Called (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 611

HG128 [57] Henry Garrett,“Super Actions On The Types of Hyper Levels In The Sensible Neutrosophic 613
SuperHyperGirth On Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 614
Graph”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.88960). 615
HG127 [58] Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Approaches on the Super Challenges on the Cancer’s 616
Recognition In the Hyper Model of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 617

2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36745.93289). 618
HG126 [59] Henry Garrett,“Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of Confrontation under 619

HG125 [60] Henry Garrett,“Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The Foggy 622
Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside Neutrosophic 623
SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010282 (doi: 624

10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 625
HG124 [61] Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s Recognition 626
On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010267 (doi: 10.20944/pre- 627
prints202301.0267.v1).). 628

(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 633
HG122 [63] Henry Garrett,“Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The Worst Case of 634
prints202301.0262.v1). 637
Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in Neutrosophic SuperHy- 639

perGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 640
HG120 [65] Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s Circumstances 641
Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 642
2023010224, (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 643
HG24 [66] Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To Monitor 644

Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 645
10.13140/RG.2.2.35061.65767). 646
HG25 [67] Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The 647
Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching 648
Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 649
10.13140/RG.2.2.18494.15680). 650

HG26 [68] Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the Can- 651
cer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By SuperHy- 652
perModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 653
10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 654
HG27 [69] Henry Garrett,“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front 655
of Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique on Can- 656
cer’s Recognition called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 657
10.13140/RG.2.2.15897.70243). 658
10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 662

prints202301.0105.v1). 665
HG28 [72] Henry Garrett,“Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recogni- 666
tion Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, 667

HG29 [73] Henry Garrett,“Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded Regions 669
and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) Su- 670
perHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 671
10.13140/RG.2.2.23172.19849). 672
HG30 [76] Henry Garrett,“Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled neutrosophic 679
Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition modeled in the Form of 680
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17385.36968). 681
Preprints 2023, 2023010044 684
SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010043 686
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 687
HG31 [79] Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To SuperHyper- 688
Model Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, 689
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28945.92007). 690

SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 695

10.13140/RG.2.2.35774.77123). 696
HG35 [83] Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Re- 700
cognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 701
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 702

(doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 708
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 710
10.13140/RG.2.2.19380.94084). 711
SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14426.41923). 719
HG962 [89] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 720
Graph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, Preprints 2022, 2022120500 721
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 722
Graph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 724

10.13140/RG.2.2.20993.12640). 725
HG952 [91] Henry Garrett,“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on Neutrosophic 726


HG95 [92] Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on Neutrosophic Su- 729
perHyperGraphs And SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, 730
ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23123.04641). 731
HG37 [95] Henry Garrett, “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating and 738
Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 739
10.13140/RG.2.2.29173.86244). 740
HG38 [96] Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some Neutrosophic 741
Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 742
(NSHG)”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 743
HG39 [97] Henry Garrett, (2022). “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”, Ohio: E-publishing: Educational 744
Publisher 1091 West 1st Ave Grandview Heights, Ohio 43212 United States. ISBN: 979-1- 745
59973-725-6 (http://fs.unm.edu/BeyondNeutrosophicGraphs.pdf). 746
HG40 [98] Henry Garrett, (2022). “Neutrosophic Duality”, Florida: GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE - 747
Publishing House 848 Brickell Ave Ste 950 Miami, Florida 33131 United States. ISBN: 748

CHAPTER 3 750
Acknowledgements 751
The author is going to express his gratitude and his appreciation about the brains and their 752
hands which are showing the importance of words in the framework of every wisdom, knowledge, 753
arts, and emotions which are streaming in the lines from the words, notions, ideas and approaches The
754 words of mind and th
to have the material and the contents which are only the way to flourish the minds, to grow the minds of words, are too
755
eligible to be in the stage
notions, to advance the ways and to make the stable ways to be amid events and storms of minds 756
of acknowledgements
for surviving from them and making the outstanding experiences about the tools and the ideas 757
to be on the star lines of words and shining like stars, forever. 758
25
CHAPTER 4 759
Cancer In Extreme SuperHyperGraph 760
The cancer is the Extreme disease but the Extreme model is going to figure out what’s going on 761
this Extreme phenomenon. The special Extreme case of this Extreme disease is considered and 762
as the consequences of the model, some parameters are used. The cells are under attack of this 763
disease but the moves of the cancer in the special region are the matter of mind. The Extreme 764
recognition of the cancer could help to find some Extreme treatments for this Extreme disease. 765
In the following, some Extreme steps are Extreme devised on this disease. 766
Step 1. (Extreme Definition) The Extreme recognition of the cancer in the long-term Extreme 767
function. 768
Step 2. (Extreme Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the Extreme model [it’s called 769
Extreme SuperHyperGraph] and the long Extreme cycle of the move from the cancer is 770
identified by this research. Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified 771
since there are some determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the 772
effects of the cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said 773
to be Extreme SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s happened and 774
what’s done. 775
Step 3. (Extreme Model) There are some specific Extreme models, which are well-known and 776
they’ve got the names, and some general Extreme models. The moves and the Extreme 777
traces of the cancer on the complex tracks and between complicated groups of cells could 778
be fantasized by a Extreme SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperDimension, SuperHyperStar, 779
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to find 780
either the Extreme SuperHyperDimension or the Extreme SuperHyperDimension in those 781
Extreme Extreme SuperHyperModels. 782
Some cells have been faced with some attacks from the situation which is caused by the cancer’s 783
attacks. In this case, there are some embedded analysis on the ongoing situations which in 784
that, the cells could be labelled as some groups and some groups or individuals have excessive 785
labels which all are raised from the behaviors to overcome the cancer’s attacks. In the embedded 786
situations, the individuals of cells and the groups of cells could be considered as “new groups”. 787
Thus it motivates us to find the proper SuperHyperModels for getting more proper analysis on 788
this messy story. I’ve found the SuperHyperModels which are officially called “SuperHyperGraphs” 789
and “Extreme SuperHyperGraphs”. In this SuperHyperModel, the cells and the groups of cells 790
are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” and the relations between the individuals of cells and 791
27
the groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperEdges”. Thus it’s another motivation for us to 792
do research on this SuperHyperModel based on the “Cancer’s Recognition”. Sometimes, the 793
situations get worst. The situation is passed from the certainty and precise style. Thus it’s the 794
beyond them. There are three descriptions, namely, the degrees of determinacy, indeterminacy 795
and neutrality, for any object based on vague forms, namely, incomplete data, imprecise data, and 796
uncertain analysis. The latter model could be considered on the previous SuperHyperModel. It’s 797
SuperHyperModel. It’s SuperHyperGraph but it’s officially called “Extreme SuperHyperGraphs”. 798
The cancer is the disease but the model is going to figure out what’s going on this phenomenon. 799
The special case of this disease is considered and as the consequences of the model, some 800
parameters are used. The cells are under attack of this disease but the moves of the cancer 801
in the special region are the matter of mind. The recognition of the cancer could help to find 802
some treatments for this disease. The SuperHyperGraph and Extreme SuperHyperGraph are the 803
SuperHyperModels on the “Cancer’s Recognition” and both bases are the background of this 804
research. Sometimes the cancer has been happened on the region, full of cells, groups of cells 805
and embedded styles. In this segment, the SuperHyperModel proposes some SuperHyperNotions 806
based on the connectivities of the moves of the cancer in the forms of alliances’ styles with 807
the formation of the design and the architecture are formally called “ SuperHyperDimension” 808
in the themes of jargons and buzzwords. The prefix “SuperHyper” refers to the theme of the 809
embedded styles to figure out the background for the SuperHyperNotions. The recognition of 810
the cancer in the long-term function. The specific region has been assigned by the model [it’s 811
called SuperHyperGraph] and the long cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this 812
research. Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some 813
determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the cancer on that 814
region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be Extreme SuperHyperGraph] 815
to have convenient perception on what’s happened and what’s done. There are some specific 816
models, which are well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general models. The moves 817
and the traces of the cancer on the complex tracks and between complicated groups of cells 818
could be fantasized by a Extreme SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperDimension, SuperHyperStar, 819
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to find either 820
the optimal SuperHyperDimension or the Extreme SuperHyperDimension in those Extreme 821
SuperHyperModels. Some general results are introduced. Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all 822
possible Extreme SuperHyperPath s have only two SuperHyperEdges but it’s not enough since 823
it’s essential to have at least three SuperHyperEdges to form any style of a SuperHyperDimension. 824
There isn’t any formation of any SuperHyperDimension but literarily, it’s the deformation of any 825
SuperHyperDimension. It, literarily, deforms and it doesn’t form. 826
Question 4.0.1. How to define the SuperHyperNotions and to do research on them to find the “ 827
amount of SuperHyperDimension” of either individual of cells or the groups of cells based on the 828
fixed cell or the fixed group of cells, extensively, the “amount of SuperHyperDimension” based on 829
the fixed groups of cells or the fixed groups of group of cells? 830
Question 4.0.2. What are the best descriptions for the “Cancer’s Recognition” in terms of these 831
messy and dense SuperHyperModels where embedded notions are illustrated? 832
It’s motivation to find notions to use in this dense model is titled “SuperHyperGraphs”. 833
Thus it motivates us to define different types of “ SuperHyperDimension” and “Extreme 834
SuperHyperDimension” on “SuperHyperGraph” and “Extreme SuperHyperGraph”. Then the 835
research has taken more motivations to define SuperHyperClasses and to find some connections 836

amid this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions. It motivates us to get some instances 837
and examples to make clarifications about the framework of this research. The general results 838
and some results about some connections are some avenues to make key point of this research, 839
“Cancer’s Recognition”, more understandable and more clear. 840
Some SuperHyperClasses and some Extreme SuperHyperClasses are the cases of this research 841
on the modeling of the regions where are under the attacks of the cancer to recognize this 842
disease as it’s mentioned on the title “Cancer’s Recognitions”. To formalize the instances on the 843
SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperDimension, the new SuperHyperClasses and SuperHyperClasses, 844
are introduced. Some general results are gathered in the section on the SuperHyperDimension and 845
the Extreme SuperHyperDimension. The clarifications, instances and literature reviews have taken 846
the whole way through. In this scientific research, the literature reviews have fulfilled the lines 847
containing the notions and the results. The SuperHyperGraph and Extreme SuperHyperGraph 848
are the SuperHyperModels on the “Cancer’s Recognitions” and both bases are the background 849
of this research. Sometimes the cancer has been happened on the region, full of cells, groups 850
of cells and embedded styles. In this scientific segment, the SuperHyperModel proposes some 851
SuperHyperNotions based on the connectivities of the moves of the cancer in the longest and 852
strongest styles with the formation of the design and the architecture are formally called “ 853
SuperHyperDimension” in the themes of jargons and buzzwords. The prefix “SuperHyper” refers 854
to the theme of the embedded styles to figure out the background for the SuperHyperNotions. 855

CHAPTER 5 856
Extreme SuperHyperDimension 857
Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions Of SuperHyperDu- 858
ality In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 859
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34953.52320). 860

Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph By 861
SuperHyperDuality As Hyper Imaginations On Super Mixed-Illustrations”, ResearchGate 2023, 862
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33275.80161). 863
Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 864
10.13140/RG.2.2.11050.90569). 866
Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of SuperHyper- 867
Join In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 868
10.13140/RG.2.2.17761.79206). 869
10.13140/RG.2.2.19911.37285). 872
Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of SuperHyperPerfect 873
10.13140/RG.2.2.23266.81602). 875
10.13140/RG.2.2.19360.87048). 878
Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of SuperHyperTotal 879
10.13140/RG.2.2.32363.21286). 881
10.13140/RG.2.2.11758.69441). 884
Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of SuperHyperConnected 885
In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 886
10.13140/RG.2.2.31891.35367). 887
10.13140/RG.2.2.21510.45125). 890
31
Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of SuperHyperDominating 891
10.13140/RG.2.2.13121.84321). 893

CHAPTER 6 894
New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper 895
Differing Of SuperHyperDimension In 896
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 897
SuperHyperGraph 898
33
CHAPTER 7 899
ABSTRACT 900
In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension). 901

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a 902
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } and E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then either V 0 or 903

E 0 is called Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension if ∀Ea , Eb ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ec ∈ E 0 , such 904
that d(Ea , Ec ) 6= d(Eb , Ec ); Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension if ∀Ea , Eb ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ 905
E 0 , ∃Ec ∈ E 0 , such that d(Ea , Ec ) 6= d(Eb , Ec ); and |Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = 906
|Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDimension if ∀Va , Vb ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ 907
V 0 , ∃Vc ∈ V 0 , such that d(Va , Vc ) 6= d(Vb , Vc ); Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension if ∀Va , Vb ∈ 908
VESHG:(V,E) \V 0 , ∃Vc ∈ V 0 , such that d(Va , Vc ) 6= d(Vb , Vc ); and |Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = 909
|Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neut- 910
rosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic v- 911
SuperHyperDimension, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension. ((Neutrosophic) Super- 912
HyperDimension). Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair 913
S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is 914
called an Extreme SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, 915

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDimension, and Neutrosophic 916
rv-SuperHyperDimension and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is 917
the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of 918
the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges 919
and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperDimension; a 920
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, Neut- 921

rosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDimension, and Neutrosophic 922
rv-SuperHyperDimension and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 923
is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neut- 924
rosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic Supe- 925
rHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic 926
SuperHyperDimension; an Extreme SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 927

of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic 928
v-SuperHyperDimension, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension and C(N SHG) for an 929
Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains 930
the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinal- 931
ity of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme car- 932
dinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that 933
35
they form the Extreme SuperHyperDimension; and the Extreme power is corresponded to 934
its Extreme coefficient; a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 935
either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, Neut- 936
rosophic v-SuperHyperDimension, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension and C(N SHG) 937
for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolyno- 938
mial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the max- 939
imum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic Su- 940

perHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 941
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDi- 942
mension; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient; an Ex- 943
treme V-SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, Neut- 944
rv-SuperHyperDimension and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the 946
maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the 947
Extreme SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges 948
Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, 950
is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neut- 953
SuperHyperDimension; an Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 956

the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality 960
of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardin- 961
ality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they 962
form the Extreme SuperHyperDimension; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Ex- 963
treme coefficient; a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 964

Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic 965
v-SuperHyperDimension, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension and C(N SHG) for a Neut- 966
rosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial contains 967
the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutro- 968
sophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 969

S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutro- 970
sophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension; and the 971
Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient. In this scientific research, 972
new setting is introduced for new SuperHyperNotions, namely, a SuperHyperDimension and 973
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension. Two different types of SuperHyperDefinitions are debut 974
for them but the research goes further and the SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and 975
SuperHyperClass based on that are well-defined and well-reviewed. The literature review is 976
implemented in the whole of this research. For shining the elegancy and the significancy of this 977
research, the comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions and 978
fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are featured. The definitions are followed by the examples 979

and the instances thus the clarifications are driven with different tools. The applications are 980
figured out to make sense about the theoretical aspect of this ongoing research. The “Cancer’s 981
Recognition” are the under research to figure out the challenges make sense about ongoing and 982
upcoming research. The special case is up. The cells are viewed in the deemed ways. There are 983
different types of them. Some of them are individuals and some of them are well-modeled by 984
the group of cells. These types are all officially called “SuperHyperVertex” but the relations 985
amid them all officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. The frameworks “SuperHyperGraph” and 986
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” are chosen and elected to research about “Cancer’s Recog- 987
nition”. Thus these complex and dense SuperHyperModels open up some avenues to research 988
on theoretical segments and “Cancer’s Recognition”. Some avenues are posed to pursue this 989
research. It’s also officially collected in the form of some questions and some problems. As- 990
sume a SuperHyperGraph. Assume a SuperHyperGraph. Then δ−SuperHyperDimension is a 991
maximal of SuperHyperVertices with a maximum cardinality such that either of the follow- 992
ing expressions hold for the (Neutrosophic) cardinalities of SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : 993
there are |S ∩ N (s)| > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ; and |S ∩ N (s)| < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ. The 994
first Expression, holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And the second Expression, holds 995
if S is an δ−SuperHyperDefensive; a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperDimension is a maximal 996
Neutrosophic of SuperHyperVertices with maximum Neutrosophic cardinality such that 997
either of the following expressions hold for the Neutrosophic cardinalities of SuperHyper- 998
Neighbors of s ∈ S there are: |S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ; 999
if S is a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And the second Expression, holds if S is a 1001
Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperDefensive It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of a Super- 1002
HyperDimension . Since there’s more ways to get type-results to make a SuperHyperDimension 1003
more understandable. For the sake of having Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension, there’s a 1004
need to “redefine” the notion of a “SuperHyperDimension ”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 1005
there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. Assume a SuperHyperDimension 1007
. It’s redefined a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension if the mentioned Table holds, concerning, 1008
“The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges Belong to 1009
The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with the key points, “The Values of The Vertices & The 1010
maximum Values of Its Endpoints”. To get structural examples and instances, I’m going to 1014
introduce the next SuperHyperClass of SuperHyperGraph based on a SuperHyperDimension . It’s 1015

the main. It’ll be disciplinary to have the foundation of previous definition in the kind of Super- 1016
HyperClass. If there’s a need to have all SuperHyperDimension until the SuperHyperDimension, 1017
then it’s officially called a “SuperHyperDimension” but otherwise, it isn’t a SuperHyperDimension 1018
. There are some instances about the clarifications for the main definition titled a “SuperHyperDi- 1019
mension ”. These two examples get more scrutiny and discernment since there are characterized 1020
in the disciplinary ways of the SuperHyperClass based on a SuperHyperDimension . For the 1021
sake of having a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension, there’s a need to “redefine” the notion 1022
of a “Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension” and a “Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension ”. The 1023
SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the 1024
alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 1025

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s redefined “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” 1026

if the intended Table holds. And a SuperHyperDimension are redefined to a “Neutrosophic 1027
SuperHyperDimension” if the intended Table holds. It’s useful to define “Neutrosophic” version 1028
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension more understandable. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHy- 1030
perGraph. There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the intended Table holds. Thus 1031
SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperDimension, SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyper- 1032

MultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are “Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic 1033
SuperHyperDimension”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite”, 1034
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite”, and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel” if the intended 1035
Table holds. A SuperHyperGraph has a “Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension” where it’s the 1036
strongest [the maximum Neutrosophic value from all the SuperHyperDimension amid the max- 1037
imum value amid all SuperHyperVertices from a SuperHyperDimension .] SuperHyperDimension 1038

. A graph is a SuperHyperUniform if it’s a SuperHyperGraph and the number of elements of 1039
SuperHyperEdges are the same. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 1040
SuperHyperClasses as follows. It’s SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection 1041
amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; it’s SuperHyperDimension if it’s only 1042
one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperStar it’s 1043
only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s 1044
only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, 1045
forming two separate sets, has no SuperHyperEdge in common; it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s 1046
be based on the “Cancer’s Recognition” and the results and the definitions will be introduced 1058
in redeemed ways. The recognition of the cancer in the long-term function. The specific region 1059
from the cancer is identified by this research. Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily 1061
identified since there are some determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and 1062
the effects of the cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said 1063
to be Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s happened and 1064
what’s done. There are some specific models, which are well-known and they’ve got the names, 1065
and some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The moves and the traces of the cancer on the 1066
complex tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a Neutrosophic 1067
SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperDimension, SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyper- 1068
Multipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to find either the longest SuperHyperDimension or 1069
the strongest SuperHyperDimension in those Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. For the longest 1070
SuperHyperDimension, called SuperHyperDimension, and the strongest SuperHyperDimension, 1071

called Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension, some general results are introduced. Beyond that 1072
in SuperHyperStar, all possible SuperHyperPaths have only two SuperHyperEdges but it’s 1073
not enough since it’s essential to have at least three SuperHyperEdges to form any style of a 1074
SuperHyperDimension. There isn’t any formation of any SuperHyperDimension but literarily, 1075
it’s the deformation of any SuperHyperDimension. It, literarily, deforms and it doesn’t form. 1076
A basic familiarity with Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension theory, SuperHyperGraphs, and 1077
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs theory are proposed. 1078

Keywords: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, SuperHyperDimension, Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1079
Recognition 1080

CHAPTER 8 1082
Applied Notions Under The Scrutiny Of 1083
The Motivation Of This Scientific Research 1084
In this scientific research, there are some ideas in the featured frameworks of motivations. I try to 1085
bring the motivations in the narrative ways. Some cells have been faced with some attacks from the 1086
situation which is caused by the cancer’s attacks. In this case, there are some embedded analysis 1087
on the ongoing situations which in that, the cells could be labelled as some groups and some groups 1088
or individuals have excessive labels which all are raised from the behaviors to overcome the cancer’s 1089
attacks. In the embedded situations, the individuals of cells and the groups of cells could be 1090
considered as “new groups”. Thus it motivates us to find the proper SuperHyperModels for getting 1091
more proper analysis on this messy story. I’ve found the SuperHyperModels which are officially 1092
called “SuperHyperGraphs” and “Extreme SuperHyperGraphs”. In this SuperHyperModel, the 1093
cells and the groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” and the relations between 1094
the individuals of cells and the groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperEdges”. Thus it’s 1095
another motivation for us to do research on this SuperHyperModel based on the “Cancer’s 1096
Recognition”. Sometimes, the situations get worst. The situation is passed from the certainty 1097
and precise style. Thus it’s the beyond them. There are three descriptions, namely, the degrees 1098
of determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality, for any object based on vague forms, namely, 1099
incomplete data, imprecise data, and uncertain analysis. The latter model could be considered on 1100
the previous SuperHyperModel. It’s SuperHyperModel. It’s SuperHyperGraph but it’s officially 1101
called “Extreme SuperHyperGraphs”. The cancer is the disease but the model is going to figure 1102
out what’s going on this phenomenon. The special case of this disease is considered and as the 1103
consequences of the model, some parameters are used. The cells are under attack of this disease 1104
but the moves of the cancer in the special region are the matter of mind. The recognition of the 1105
cancer could help to find some treatments for this disease. The SuperHyperGraph and Extreme 1106
SuperHyperGraph are the SuperHyperModels on the “Cancer’s Recognition” and both bases are 1107
the background of this research. Sometimes the cancer has been happened on the region, full 1108
of cells, groups of cells and embedded styles. In this segment, the SuperHyperModel proposes 1109
some SuperHyperNotions based on the connectivities of the moves of the cancer in the forms 1110
of alliances’ styles with the formation of the design and the architecture are formally called “ 1111
to the theme of the embedded styles to figure out the background for the SuperHyperNotions. The 1113
recognition of the cancer in the long-term function. The specific region has been assigned by the 1114
model [it’s called SuperHyperGraph] and the long cycle of the move from the cancer is identified 1115
41
by this research. Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some 1116
determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the cancer on that 1117
region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be Extreme SuperHyperGraph] 1118
to have convenient perception on what’s happened and what’s done. There are some specific 1119
models, which are well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general models. The moves 1120
and the traces of the cancer on the complex tracks and between complicated groups of cells 1121
could be fantasized by a Extreme SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperDimension, SuperHyperStar, 1122

SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to find either 1123
the optimal SuperHyperDimension or the Extreme SuperHyperDimension in those Extreme 1124
SuperHyperModels. Some general results are introduced. Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all 1125
possible Extreme SuperHyperPath s have only two SuperHyperEdges but it’s not enough since 1126
it’s essential to have at least three SuperHyperEdges to form any style of a SuperHyperDimension. 1127
There isn’t any formation of any SuperHyperDimension but literarily, it’s the deformation of any 1128
SuperHyperDimension. It, literarily, deforms and it doesn’t form. 1129
Thus it motivates us to define different types of “ SuperHyperDimension” and “Extreme 1137
SuperHyperDimension” on “SuperHyperGraph” and “Extreme SuperHyperGraph”. Then the 1138
The framework of this research is as follows. In the beginning, I introduce basic definitions to clarify 1144
about preliminaries. In the subsection “Preliminaries”, initial definitions about SuperHyperGraphs 1145
and Extreme SuperHyperGraph are deeply-introduced and in-depth-discussed. The elementary 1146
concepts are clarified and illustrated completely and sometimes review literature are applied to 1147
make sense about what’s going to figure out about the upcoming sections. The main definitions and 1148
their clarifications alongside some results about new notions, SuperHyperDimension and Extreme 1149
SuperHyperDimension, are figured out in sections “ SuperHyperDimension” and “Extreme 1150
SuperHyperDimension”. In the sense of tackling on getting results and in order to make sense 1151
about continuing the research, the ideas of SuperHyperUniform and Extreme SuperHyperUniform 1152
are introduced and as their consequences, corresponded SuperHyperClasses are figured out to 1153
debut what’s done in this section, titled “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Extreme 1154
SuperHyperClasses”. As going back to origin of the notions, there are some smart steps toward 1155
the common notions to extend the new notions in new frameworks, SuperHyperGraph and 1156
Extreme SuperHyperGraph, in the sections “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on 1157
Extreme SuperHyperClasses”. The starter research about the general SuperHyperRelations and 1158
as concluding and closing section of theoretical research are contained in the section “General 1159
Results”. Some general SuperHyperRelations are fundamental and they are well-known as 1160

fundamental SuperHyperNotions as elicited and discussed in the sections, “General Results”, 1161
“ SuperHyperDimension”, “Extreme SuperHyperDimension”, “Results on SuperHyperClasses” 1162
and “Results on Extreme SuperHyperClasses”. There are curious questions about what’s done 1163
about the SuperHyperNotions to make sense about excellency of this research and going to 1164
figure out the word “best” as the description and adjective for this research as presented 1165
in section, “ SuperHyperDimension”. The keyword of this research debut in the section 1166
“Applications in Cancer’s Recognition” with two cases and subsections “Case 1: The Initial 1167
Steps Toward SuperHyperBipartite as SuperHyperModel” and “Case 2: The Increasing Steps 1168
Toward SuperHyperMultipartite as SuperHyperModel”. In the section, “Open Problems”, there 1169
are some scrutiny and discernment on what’s done and what’s happened in this research in the 1170
terms of “questions” and “problems” to make sense to figure out this research in featured style. 1171
The advantages and the limitations of this research alongside about what’s done in this research 1172
to make sense and to get sense about what’s figured out are included in the section, “Conclusion 1173
and Closing Remarks”. 1174

CHAPTER 9 1175
Extreme Preliminaries Of This Scientific 1176
Research On the Redeemed Ways 1177
In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 1178
Neutrosophic Set](Ref.[HG38],Definition 2.2,p.2), [Neutrosophic Set](Ref.[HG38],Definition 1179
2.1,p.1), [Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref.[HG38],Definition 2.5,p.2), [Charac- 1180

terization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref.[HG38],Definition 2.7,p.3), [t- 1181
norm](Ref.[HG38], Definition 2.7, p.3), and [Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 1182
Graph (NSHG)](Ref.[HG38],Definition 2.7,p.3), [Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic 1183
SuperHyperPaths] (Ref.[HG38],Definition 5.3,p.7), and [Different Neutrosophic Types of Neut- 1184
rosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] (Ref.[HG38],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new ideas and 1185
their clarifications are addressed to Ref.[HG38]. 1186

In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this scientific research, is presented. Also, 1187
the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 1188
Definition 9.0.1 (Neutrosophic Set). (Ref.[HG38],Definition 2.1,p.1).

Let X be a space of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by x; then the
Neutrosophic set A (NS A) is an object having the form
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}

+
where the functions T, I, F : X →]− 0, 1 [ define respectively the a truth-membership
function, an indeterminacy-membership function, and a falsity-membership function
of the element x ∈ X to the set A with the condition
−
0 ≤ TA (x) + IA (x) + FA (x) ≤ 3+ .
+
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of ]− 0, 1 [. 1189
Definition 9.0.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref.[HG38],Definition 2.2,p.2).

Let X be a space of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by x. A single valued
Neutrosophic set A (SVNS A) is characterized by truth-membership function TA (x), an
indeterminacy-membership function IA (x), and a falsity-membership function FA (x). For each
point x in X, TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) ∈ [0, 1]. A SVNS A can be written as
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}.
45
Definition 9.0.3. The degree of truth-membership, indeterminacy-membership and

falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {<
x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
TA (X) = min[TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = min[IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = min[FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 9.0.4. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x :
TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 9.0.5 (Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). (Ref.[HG38],Definition 2.5,p.2). 1190
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair 1191

S = (V, E), where 1192
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 1193
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 1194
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V ; 1195
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 1196
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 1197
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 1198
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 1199
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ); 1200
0
(ix) and the following conditions hold:
TV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
IV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,

and FV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0
where i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 . 1201
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 1202
(NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the 1203
degree of truth-membership, the degree of indeterminacy-membership and the degree of 1204

falsity-membership the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic 1205
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth- 1206
membership, the degree of indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership 1207
of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) 1208
E. Thus, the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 1209
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 1210

Definition 9.0.6 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 1211

(Ref.[HG38],Definition 2.7,p.3). 1212
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). The 1213
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) 1214
Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be characterized as follow-up 1215
items. 1216
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 1217
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 1218
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 1219
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called HyperEdge; 1220
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 1221
SuperEdge; 1222
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 1223
SuperHyperEdge. 1224
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse types of 1225
general forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG). 1226
Definition 9.0.7 (t-norm). (Ref.[HG38], Definition 2.7, p.3). 1227

A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following for 1228
x, y, z, w ∈ [0, 1]: 1229
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 1230
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 1231
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 1232
(iv) If w ≤ x and y ≤ z then w ⊗ y ≤ x ⊗ z. 1233

falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {<
x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X} (with respect to t-norm Tnorm ):
TA (X) = Tnorm [TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = Tnorm [IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = Tnorm [FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
Definition 9.0.10. (General Forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 1234

S = (V, E), where 1236

(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 1241
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 1242
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 1243
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ). 1244
0

items. 1259
SuperEdge; 1265
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have some 1268
restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this SuperHyperGraph 1269
makes the patterns and regularities. 1270
Definition 9.0.12. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it’s SuperHyperGraph and the number 1271
of elements of SuperHyperEdges are the same. 1272

To get more visions on SuperHyperUniform, the some SuperHyperClasses are introduced. It 1273
makes to have SuperHyperUniform more understandable. 1274
Definition 9.0.13. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some SuperHyperClasses 1275
as follows. 1276
(i). It’s Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 1277
two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; 1278
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given 1279
SuperHyperEdges; 1280
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all SuperHyperEdges; 1281
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given Supe- 1282
rHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has no SuperHyperEdge 1283
in common; 1284
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 1285
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, has no 1286
SuperHyperEdge in common; 1287
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given 1288
SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any common 1289
SuperVertex. 1290
Definition 9.0.14. Let an ordered pair S = (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph

(NSHG) S. Then a sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
is called a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 1291

(NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs if either of following conditions hold: 1292
(i) Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 1293
(ii) there’s a vertex vi ∈ Vi such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 1294
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 1295
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 1296
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ E i0 ; 1297
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 1298
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 1299
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 1300
(ix) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1

0
∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , Vi+1
0
∈ Ei0 . 1301

Definition 9.0.15. (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths).

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). a
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices
(NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
could be characterized as follow-up items. 1302
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 1303
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 1304
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 1305
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 1306
Path . 1307
Definition 9.0.16 (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths).

(Ref.[HG38],Definition 5.3,p.7).
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). A
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 1308
(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 1309
(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 1310
(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 1311
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 1312
Definition 9.0.17 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)). 1313

Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 1316
(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic t-strength of 1317

SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic 1318
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 1319
(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic i-strength of 1320


(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic f-strength of 1323

(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 1326
strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to 1327
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 1328
Definition 9.0.18. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension). 1329

Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } and E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then either V 0 1331
or E 0 is called 1332
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension if ∀Ea , Eb ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ec ∈ E 0 , 1333

such that d(Ea , Ec ) 6= d(Eb , Ec ); 1334
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension if ∀Ea , Eb ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ec ∈ 1335

E 0 , such that d(Ea , Ec ) 6= d(Eb , Ec ); and |Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = 1336
|Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 1337
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDimension if ∀Va , Vb ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vc ∈ V 0 , such 1338

that d(Va , Vc ) 6= d(Vb , Vc ); 1339
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension if ∀Va , Vb ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vc ∈ 1340

V 0 , such that d(Va , Vc ) 6= d(Vb , Vc ); and |Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = 1341
|Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 1342
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension,

1343
Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDimension, and Neut- 1344
rosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension. 1345
Definition 9.0.19. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDimension). 1346

(i) an Extreme SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension,1349

rosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 1351
N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of 1352
high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme 1353
sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they 1354
form the Extreme SuperHyperDimension; 1355
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic e- 1356

SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic v- 1357
SuperHyperDimension, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension and C(N SHG) for a 1358
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic cardin- 1359
ality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 1360
Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic 1361
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension; 1362

(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neut- 1363

rosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic 1364
v-SuperHyperDimension, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension and C(N SHG) for 1365
an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial 1366
contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme 1367
cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high 1368
Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVer- 1369

tices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperDimension; and the Extreme power is 1370
corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; 1371
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 1372

Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, Neutro- 1373
sophic v-SuperHyperDimension, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension and C(N SHG) 1374
for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPoly- 1375
nomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the 1376
maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic 1377

SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHy- 1378
perEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic 1379
SuperHyperDimension; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic 1380
coefficient; 1381
(v) an Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension,1382

high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme 1386
(vi) a Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic e- 1389

Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality 1392
of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 1393
(vii) an Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neut- 1396

cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high 1401
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 1405


for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 1408
Polynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number 1409
of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of 1410
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutro- 1411
sophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 1412
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 1413

Neutrosophic coefficient. 1414
Definition 9.0.20. ((Extreme/Neutrosophic)δ−SuperHyperDimension). 1415

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). Then 1416
(i) an δ−SuperHyperDimension is a Neutrosophic kind of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDi- 1417

mension such that either of the following expressions hold for the Neutrosophic cardinalities 1418
of SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : 1419
|S ∩ N (s)| > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ; 136EQN1
|S ∩ N (s)| < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ. 136EQN2
The Expression (29.1), holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And the Expression 1420

(29.1), holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperDefensive; 1421
(ii) a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperDimension is a Neutrosophic kind of Neutrosophic 1422

SuperHyperDimension such that either of the following Neutrosophic expressions hold for 1423
the Neutrosophic cardinalities of SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : 1424
|S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ; 136EQN3
|S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ. 136EQN4
The Expression (29.1), holds if S is a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And 1425

the Expression (29.1), holds if S is a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperDefensive. 1426
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension, there’s a need to “redefine” the 1427
notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. The SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges 1428

are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the usage 1429
of the position of labels to assign to the values. 1430
136DEF1 Definition 9.0.21. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair 1431
S = (V, E). It’s redefined Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (29.1) holds. 1432
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s more ways 1433
to get Neutrosophic type-results to make a Neutrosophic more understandable. 1434
S = (V, E). There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (29.2) holds. 1436
Thus Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath , SuperHyperDimension, SuperHyperStar, SuperHyper- 1437
Bipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 1438
Path, Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar, Neutrosophic 1439
SuperHyperBipartite, Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite, and Neutrosophic Su- 1440
perHyperWheel if the Table (29.2) holds. 1441

Table 9.1: The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges
Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition (29.0.23)
The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet

The Values of The SuperVertices The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
136TBL3
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Endpoints
Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition (29.0.22)

136TBL4

136TBL1
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension. Since 1442

there’s more ways to get type-results to make a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension more 1443
Neutrosophicly understandable. 1444
Neutrosophic notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 1446

there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 1448
136DEF1 Definition 9.0.23. Assume a SuperHyperDimension. It’s redefined a Neutrosophic SuperHy- 1449
perDimension if the Table (29.3) holds. 1450

CHAPTER 10 1451
Extreme SuperHyperDimension But As 1452
The Extensions Excerpt From Dense And 1453
Super Forms 1454
136EXM1 Example 10.0.1. Assume a Extreme SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E) 1455
in the mentioned Extreme Figures in every Extreme items. 1456
• On the Figure (30.1), the Extreme SuperHyperNotion, namely, Extreme SuperHyperDi- 1457
mension, is up. The Extreme Algorithm is Extremely straightforward. E1 and E3 are some 1458
empty Extreme SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop Extreme SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a 1459
Extreme SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Extreme SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s 1460
only one Extreme SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Extreme SuperHyperVertex, V3 is 1461
Extreme isolated means that there’s no Extreme SuperHyperEdge has it as a Extreme 1462
endpoint. Thus the Extreme SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given Extreme 1463
SuperHyperDimension. 1464
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension = {Ei }3i=1 .

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi }3i=1 .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z 3 .
1465
mension, is up. The Extreme Algorithm is Extremely straightforward. E1 , E2 and E3 are 1467
some empty Extreme SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a Extreme SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the 1468
terms of Extreme SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Extreme SuperHyperEdge, namely, 1469
E4 . The Extreme SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Extreme isolated means that there’s no Extreme 1470
SuperHyperEdge has it as a Extreme endpoint. Thus the Extreme SuperHyperVertex, V3 , 1471
55
Figure 10.1: The Extreme SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Extreme Notions of Extreme
SuperHyperDimension in the Extreme Example (42.0.3) 136NSHG1
is excluded in every given Extreme SuperHyperDimension. 1472

C(N SHG)Extreme V-Quasi-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z 3 .
1473
mension, is up. The Extreme Algorithm is Extremely straightforward. 1475

C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z 3 .
1476
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {Ei }i6=1,2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi }Vi 6=V3 ,V4 ,O .


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial == 2z 5 .
1479
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension = {Ei }i6=1 .

C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi }i6=5,6 .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
= 5 × 4 + 4 × 3 + 4 × 5 × 4z 13 .
1482

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
= 2 × 8z 21 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi }i6=2,3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
= 2 × 820 .
1485


C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension = {Ei }i6=13,15,16 .

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3 × 2 × 1z 13 .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi }i6=6,12,13 .
= (3 × 2 × 4) + (2 × 4 × 2 × 3) + z 11 .
1488
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension = {Ei }i6=2,4 .

= 3 × 1 × 2z 2 .
= (3 × 2 × 4) + (2 × 4 × 2 × 3) + z 11 .
1491


= 2 × 8z 21 .
= 2 × 820 .
1494
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension = {Ei }i6=2,4 .

= 3 × 1 × 2z 2 .
= (3 × 2 × 4) + (2 × 4 × 2 × 3) + z 11 .


1497

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial sz 2 .
= 3 × 2z 4 .
1500

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial == 6z 5 .
= 4z 8 .
1503


= 3 × 2z 4 .
1506
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension = {E2 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z.
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension = {V2 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z.
1509


C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension = {V5 , Vi }i6=2,4 .
1512

C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension = {V1 , Vi }i6=2,6,10,17,22 .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 8z n−5 .
1515


1518

C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension = {V27 , Vi }i6=1,2,6,10,17,22 .
1521
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {E1 , E2 }.



C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 12z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {V1 , V2 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 11z 2 .
1524

C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension
= {Vi }Vi 6=V1 ,{H13 } .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = sz.
1527

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z.
1530

= {V1 , Vi }i6=2,10,6,5 .
= 5 × 1z n−4 .
1533

SuperHyperDimension in the Extreme Example (42.0.3) 95NHG1

SuperHyperDimension in the Extreme Example (42.0.3) 95NHG2

CHAPTER 11 1534
The Extreme Departures on The 1535
Theoretical Results Toward Theoretical 1536
Motivations 1537
The previous Extreme approach apply on the upcoming Extreme results on Extreme 1538
SuperHyperClasses. 1539
Proposition 11.0.1. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). Then 1540
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension = {E1 }

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z
= {V1 , V EXT ERN AL , V IN T ERN AL }Vi 6=nV EXT ERN AL
n−{V1 ,V EXT ERN AL ,V IN T ERN AL }V EXT ERN AL
= nz i 6=nV
Proof. Let 1541
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). There’s a 1542
new way to redefine as 1543
ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .
The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 1544
ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperDimension. The latter is straightforward. 1545
73
Figure 11.1: a Extreme SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of Extreme SuperHyperDi-

mension in the Example (42.0.5) 136NSHG18a
136EXM18a Example 11.0.2. In the Figure (31.1), the connected Extreme SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E), 1546
is highlighted and featured. The Extreme SuperHyperSet, in the Extreme SuperHyperModel 1547
(31.1), is the SuperHyperDimension. 1548
There are two notions on SuperHyperDimension in SuperHyperCycle. Twin and antipodal. 1549
The first is about having the same SuperHyperNeighborhoods and the latter is having the same 1550
SuperHyperDistance but both could not be out of the any given SuperHyperDimension easily. 1551
All Twin SuperHyperVertices could not be out of the any given SuperHyperDimension and one 1552
of them could be out but the latter have to be inside. All Antipodal SuperHyperVertices could 1553
not be out of the any given SuperHyperDimension and one of them could be out but the latter 1554
have to be inside. and one of them could be out but the latter have to be inside. The proof for 1555
both of the is straightforward. 1556
Proposition 11.0.3. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). Then 1557
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension = {E1 , E2 }

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = nz 2
= {V1 , V2 , V EXT ERN AL , V IN T ERN AL }Vi 6=nV EXT ERN AL
n−{V1 ,V2 ,V EXT ERN AL ,V IN T ERN AL }V EXT ERN AL
= nz i 6=nV

Figure 11.2: a Extreme SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Extreme Notions of Extreme

SuperHyperDimension in the Extreme Example (42.0.7) 136NSHG19a
Proof. Let 1558
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...
be a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). There’s a 1559

136EXM19a Example 11.0.4. In the Figure (31.2), the connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle N SHC : 1563
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, in the Extreme 1564
SuperHyperModel (31.2), is the Extreme SuperHyperDimension. 1565

Proposition 11.0.5. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). Then 1566
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension

= {Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }Ei 6=E1 .
= nz |i | E1 6=Ei ∈EESHG:(V,E) |
.
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }Vi 6=V1 ,V2 .
= n choose two z n−|{Vi ∈VESHG:(V,E) }Vi 6=V1 ,V2 | .
Proof. Let 1567
P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei , CEN T ER, Ej .

be a longest path taken a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). There’s a new 1568
way to redefine as 1569

136EXM20a Example 11.0.6. In the Figure (31.3), the connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), 1572
is highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous 1573
Extreme result, of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of the connected Extreme SuperHyperStar 1574
ESHS : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel (31.3), is the Extreme SuperHyperDimension. 1575
1576
Proposition 11.0.7. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). Then 1577

= {Ea ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) ,
∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | = min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
where ∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) |
= min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
= {VaEXT ERN AL ∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
= =( (|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |choose 2) = z 2 .
EXT ERN AL |
|VESHG:(V,E) i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
Extreme Cardinality

Figure 11.3: a Extreme SuperHyperStar Associated to the Extreme Notions of Extreme

Proof. Let 1578
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). There’s 1579
a new way to redefine as 1580

ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperDimension. The latter is straightforward. Then 1582
there’s no at least one SuperHyperDimension. Thus the notion of quasi may be up but 1583
the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperDimension could be applied. There are only 1584
two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one SuperHyperVertex as the 1585

Figure 11.4: Extreme SuperHyperBipartite Extreme Associated to the Extreme Notions of

Extreme SuperHyperDimension in the Example (42.0.11) 136NSHG21a
representative in the 1586
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperDimension taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : 1587
(V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only minimum-Extreme-of-SuperHyperPart 1588
SuperHyperEdges are attained in any solution 1589
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
The latter is straightforward. 1590
136EXM21a Example 11.0.8. In the Extreme Figure (31.4), the connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite 1591
ESHB : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and Extreme featured. The obtained Extreme 1592
SuperHyperSet, by the Extreme Algorithm in previous Extreme result, of the Extreme 1593
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the 1594
Extreme SuperHyperModel (31.4), is the Extreme SuperHyperDimension. 1595
Proposition 11.0.9. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). Then 1596


i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Extreme Cardinality
Proof. Let 1597
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperDimension taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite 1598
ESHM : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 1599

z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one SuperHyperVertex as the 1604
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). Thus 1606
only some SuperHyperVertices and only minimum-Extreme-of-SuperHyperPart SuperHyperEdges 1607
are attained in any solution 1608
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

Figure 11.5: a Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of Extreme

SuperHyperDimension in the Example (42.0.13) 136NSHG22a
is a longest path taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). The 1609
latter is straightforward. 1610
136EXM22a Example 11.0.10. In the Figure (31.5), the connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : 1611
(V, E), is highlighted and Extreme featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by the 1612
Algorithm in previous Extreme result, of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of the connected 1613
Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel (31.5), is 1614
the Extreme SuperHyperDimension. 1615
Proposition 11.0.11. Assume a connected Extreme SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). Then, 1616

.
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }Vi 6=V1 ,V2 .
Proof. Let 1617
P : V EXT ERN AL i , E ∗ i , CEN T ER, Ej .

is a longest SuperHyperDimension taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperWheel ESHW : 1618
(V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 1619

Figure 11.6: a Extreme SuperHyperWheel Extreme Associated to the Extreme Notions of Extreme

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded 1620
to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperDimension. The latter is straightforward. 1621
Then there’s at least one SuperHyperDimension. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and 1622
the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperDimension could be applied. The unique 1623
embedded SuperHyperDimension proposes some longest SuperHyperDimension excerpt from 1624

some representatives. The latter is straightforward. 1625
136EXM23a Example 11.0.12. In the Extreme Figure (31.6), the connected Extreme SuperHyperWheel 1626
N SHW : (V, E), is Extreme highlighted and featured. The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by 1627
the Algorithm in previous result, of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of the connected Extreme 1628
SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel (31.6), is the Extreme 1629

CHAPTER 12 1631
The Surveys of Mathematical Sets On The 1632
Results But As The Initial Motivation 1633
For the SuperHyperDimension, Extreme SuperHyperDimension, and the Extreme SuperHyperDi- 1634
mension, some general results are introduced. 1635
Remark 12.0.1. Let remind that the Extreme SuperHyperDimension is “redefined” on the positions 1636
of the alphabets. 1637
Corollary 12.0.2. Assume Extreme SuperHyperDimension. Then 1638
Extreme SuperHyperDimension =
{theSuperHyperDimensionof theSuperHyperV ertices |
max |SuperHyperOf f ensive
SuperHyperDimension
|ExtremecardinalityamidthoseSuperHyperDimension. }
plus one Extreme SuperHypeNeighbor to one. Where σi is the unary operation on the 1639
SuperHyperVertices of the SuperHyperGraph to assign the determinacy, the indeterminacy and 1640
the neutrality, for i = 1, 2, 3, respectively. 1641
Corollary 12.0.3. Assume a Extreme SuperHyperGraph on the same identical letter of the alphabet. 1642
Then the notion of Extreme SuperHyperDimension and SuperHyperDimension coincide. 1643
Then a consecutive sequence of the SuperHyperVertices is a Extreme SuperHyperDimension if 1645
and only if it’s a SuperHyperDimension. 1646
Then a consecutive sequence of the SuperHyperVertices is a strongest SuperHyperDimension if 1648
and only if it’s a longest SuperHyperDimension. 1649
Corollary 12.0.6. Assume SuperHyperClasses of a Extreme SuperHyperGraph on the same 1650
identical letter of the alphabet. Then its Extreme SuperHyperDimension is its SuperHyper- 1651
Dimension and reversely. 1652
83
Corollary 12.0.7. Assume a Extreme SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperDimension, SuperHyperStar, 1653

SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel) on the same identical letter of 1654
the alphabet. Then its Extreme SuperHyperDimension is its SuperHyperDimension and reversely. 1655
Corollary 12.0.8. Assume a Extreme SuperHyperGraph. Then its Extreme SuperHyperDimension 1656
isn’t well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperDimension isn’t well-defined. 1657
Corollary 12.0.9. Assume SuperHyperClasses of a Extreme SuperHyperGraph. Then its Extreme 1658
SuperHyperDimension isn’t well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperDimension isn’t well-defined. 1659

SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). Then its Extreme SuperHyper- 1661
Dimension isn’t well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperDimension isn’t well-defined. 1662
Corollary 12.0.11. Assume a Extreme SuperHyperGraph. Then its Extreme SuperHyperDimen- 1663
sion is well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperDimension is well-defined. 1664
Corollary 12.0.12. Assume SuperHyperClasses of a Extreme SuperHyperGraph. Then its Extreme 1665
SuperHyperDimension is well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperDimension is well-defined. 1666

SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). Then its Extreme SuperHyper- 1668
Dimension is well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperDimension is well-defined. 1669
Proposition 12.0.14. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Extreme SuperHyperGraph. Then V is 1670
(i) : the dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1671
(ii) : the strong dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1672
(iii) : the connected dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1673
(iv) : the δ-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1674
(v) : the strong δ-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1675
(vi) : the connected δ-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 1676
Proposition 12.0.15. Let N T G : (V, E, σ, µ) be a Extreme SuperHyperGraph. Then ∅ is 1677
(i) : the SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1678
(ii) : the strong SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1679
(iii) : the connected defensive SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1680
(iv) : the δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1681
(v) : the strong δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1682
(vi) : the connected δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 1683
Proposition 12.0.16. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Extreme SuperHyperGraph. Then an independent 1684
SuperHyperSet is 1685

(iii) : the connected SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1688
Proposition 12.0.17. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Extreme SuperHyperUniform SuperHyperGraph 1692

which is a SuperHyperDimension/SuperHyperPath. Then V is a maximal 1693
(i) : SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1694
(ii) : strong SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1695
(iii) : connected SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1696
(iv) : O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1697
(v) : strong O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1698
(vi) : connected O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1699
Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices coincide. 1700
Proposition 12.0.18. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Extreme SuperHyperGraph which is a SuperHy- 1701
perUniform SuperHyperWheel. Then V is a maximal 1702
(i) : dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1703
(ii) : strong dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1704
(iii) : connected dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1705
(iv) : O(ESHG)-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1706
(v) : strong O(ESHG)-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1707
(vi) : connected O(ESHG)-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1708
which is a SuperHyperDimension/SuperHyperPath. Then the number of 1711
(i) : the SuperHyperDimension; 1712
(ii) : the SuperHyperDimension; 1713
(iii) : the connected SuperHyperDimension; 1714
(iv) : the O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDimension; 1715

(v) : the strong O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDimension; 1716
(vi) : the connected O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDimension. 1717
is one and it’s only V. Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices 1718
coincide. 1719

which is a SuperHyperWheel. Then the number of 1721
(i) : the dual SuperHyperDimension; 1722
(ii) : the dual SuperHyperDimension; 1723
(iii) : the dual connected SuperHyperDimension; 1724
(iv) : the dual O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDimension; 1725
(v) : the strong dual O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDimension; 1726
(vi) : the connected dual O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDimension. 1727
coincide. 1729

which is a SuperHyperStar/SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperBipartite/SuperHyperComplete 1731
SuperHyperMultipartite. Then a SuperHyperSet contains [the SuperHyperCenter and] the half of 1732
multiplying r with the number of all the SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the SuperHyperVertices 1733
is a 1734
O(ESHG)
(iv) : 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1738
O(ESHG)
(v) : strong 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1739
O(ESHG)
(vi) : connected 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 1740

SuperHyperMultipartite. Then a SuperHyperSet contains the half of multiplying r with the number 1743
of all the SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the SuperHyperVertices in the biggest SuperHyperPart 1744
is a 1745

(iv) : δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1749
(v) : strong δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1750
(vi) : connected δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 1751

SuperHyperMultipartite. Then Then the number of 1754
O(ESHG)
O(ESHG)
O(ESHG)
is one and it’s only S, a SuperHyperSet contains [the SuperHyperCenter and] the half of multiplying 1761
r with the number of all the SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the SuperHyperVertices. Where the 1762
exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices coincide. 1763
Proposition 12.0.24. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Extreme SuperHyperGraph. The number of 1764
connected component is |V − S| if there’s a SuperHyperSet which is a dual 1765
(iv) : SuperHyperDimension; 1769
(v) : strong 1-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1770
(vi) : connected 1-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 1771
Proposition 12.0.25. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Extreme SuperHyperGraph. Then the number is 1772
at most O(ESHG) and the Extreme number is at most On (ESHG). 1773
Proposition 12.0.26. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Extreme SuperHyperGraph which is Su- 1774
perHyperComplete. The number is O(ESHG:(V,E))2 + 1 and the Extreme number is 1775
min Σv∈{v1 ,v2 ,··· ,vt } O(ESHG:(V,E)) ⊆V σ(v), in the setting of dual 1776
t>
2

(iv) : ( O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1780
(v) : strong ( O(ESHG:(V,E))

(vi) : connected ( O(ESHG:(V,E))

2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 1782
Proposition 12.0.27. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Extreme SuperHyperGraph which is ∅. The number 1783
is 0 and the Extreme number is 0, for an independent SuperHyperSet in the setting of dual 1784
(iv) : 0-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1788
Proposition 12.0.28. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Extreme SuperHyperGraph which is SuperHyper- 1791
Complete. Then there’s no independent SuperHyperSet. 1792
Proposition 12.0.29. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Extreme SuperHyperGraph which is SuperHy- 1793
perDimension/SuperHyperPath/SuperHyperWheel. The number is O(ESHG : (V, E)) and the 1794

Extreme number is On (ESHG : (V, E)), in the setting of a dual 1795
(iv) : O(ESHG : (V, E))-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1799
(v) : strong O(ESHG : (V, E))-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1800
(vi) : connected O(ESHG : (V, E))-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 1801
Proposition 12.0.30. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Extreme SuperHyperGraph which is Super- 1802
HyperStar/complete SuperHyperBipartite/complete SuperHyperMultiPartite. The number is 1803
O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1 and the Extreme number is min Σv∈{v1 ,v2 ,··· ,vt } O(ESHG:(V,E)) ⊆V σ(v), in the 1804
t>
2
setting of a dual 1805



Proposition 12.0.31. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a SuperHyperFamily of the ESHGs : (V, E) 1812
Extreme SuperHyperGraphs which are from one-type SuperHyperClass which the result is obtained 1813
for the individuals. Then the results also hold for the SuperHyperFamily N SHF : (V, E) of these 1814
specific SuperHyperClasses of the Extreme SuperHyperGraphs. 1815
Proposition 12.0.32. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Extreme SuperHyperGraph. If S is a dual 1816
SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension, then ∀v ∈ V \ S, ∃x ∈ S such that 1817
(i) v ∈ Ns (x); 1818
(ii) vx ∈ E. 1819
Proposition 12.0.33. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Extreme SuperHyperGraph. If S is a dual 1820
SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension, then 1821
(i) S is SuperHyperDimension set; 1822
(ii) there’s S ⊆ S 0 such that |S 0 | is SuperHyperChromatic number. 1823
Proposition 12.0.34. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Extreme SuperHyperGraph. Then 1824
(i) Γ ≤ O; 1825
(ii) Γs ≤ On . 1826
Proposition 12.0.35. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Extreme SuperHyperGraph which is 1827
connected. Then 1828
(i) Γ ≤ O − 1; 1829
(ii) Γs ≤ On − Σ3i=1 σi (x). 1830
Proposition 12.0.36. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an odd SuperHyperPath. Then 1831
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDi- 1832

mension; 1833
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1 and corresponded SuperHyperSet is S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 }; 1834
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· ,vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1835
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 } are only a dual 1836
Proposition 12.0.37. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an even SuperHyperPath. Then 1838
(i) the set S = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1839

(ii) Γ = b n2 c and corresponded SuperHyperSets are {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } and {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 }; 1840
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1841
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 } are only dual 1842
Proposition 12.0.38. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an even SuperHyperDimension. Then 1844
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimen- 1845

sion; 1846
(ii) Γ = b n2 c and corresponded SuperHyperSets are {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } and {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 }; 1847
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn } σ(s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· ,vn−1 } σ(s)}; 1848
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 } are only dual 1849
Proposition 12.0.39. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an odd SuperHyperDimension. Then 1851

mension; 1853
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1855
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn−1 } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 } are only dual 1856
Proposition 12.0.40. Let ESHG : (V, E) be SuperHyperStar. Then 1858
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {c} is a dual maximal SuperHyperDimension; 1859
(ii) Γ = 1; 1860
(iii) Γs = Σ3i=1 σi (c); 1861
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {c} and S ⊂ S 0 are only dual SuperHyperDimension. 1862
Proposition 12.0.41. Let ESHG : (V, E) be SuperHyperWheel. Then 1863
6+3(i−1)≤n
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 is a dual maximal 1864
SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1865
6+3(i−1)≤n
(ii) Γ = |{v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 |; 1866
(iii) Γs = Σ{v1 ,v3 }∪{v6 ,v9 ··· ,vi+6 ,··· ,vn }6+3(i−1)≤n Σ3i=1 σi (s); 1867
i=1
6+3(i−1)≤n
(iv) the SuperHyperSet {v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 is only a dual maximal 1868
SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 1869
Proposition 12.0.42. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an odd SuperHyperComplete. Then 1870

b n c+1
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1871
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1; 1872
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S Σ3i=1 σi (s)} b n c+1

2
; 1873
S={vi }i=1
b n c+1
(iv) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is only a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimen- 1874
sion. 1875
Proposition 12.0.43. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an even SuperHyperComplete. Then 1876
bn
2c
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1877
(ii) Γ = b n2 c; 1878
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S Σ3i=1 σi (s)} bnc

2
; 1879
S={vi }i=1
bnc
2
is only a dual maximal SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyper- 1880
Dimension. 1881
Proposition 12.0.44. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a m-SuperHyperFamily of Extreme SuperHyperStars 1882
with common Extreme SuperHyperVertex SuperHyperSet. Then 1883
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {c1 , c2 , · · · , cm } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimen- 1884

sion for N SHF; 1885
(ii) Γ = m for N SHF : (V, E); 1886
(iii) Γs = Σm 3
i=1 Σj=1 σj (ci ) for N SHF : (V, E); 1887
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {c1 , c2 , · · · , cm } and S ⊂ S 0 are only dual SuperHyperDimension 1888
for N SHF : (V, E). 1889
Proposition 12.0.45. Let N SHF : (V, E) be an m-SuperHyperFamily of odd SuperHyperComplete 1890

SuperHyperGraphs with common Extreme SuperHyperVertex SuperHyperSet. Then 1891
b n c+1
2
is a dual maximal SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDi- 1892
mension for N SHF; 1893
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1 for N SHF : (V, E); 1894

2
for N SHF : (V, E); 1895
S={vi }i=1
b n c+1
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {vi }i=1
2
are only a dual maximal SuperHyperDimension for 1896
N SHF : (V, E). 1897
Proposition 12.0.46. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a m-SuperHyperFamily of even SuperHyperComplete 1898

SuperHyperGraphs with common Extreme SuperHyperVertex SuperHyperSet. Then 1899
bnc
2
is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension for 1900
N SHF : (V, E); 1901

(ii) Γ = b n2 c for N SHF : (V, E); 1902

2
for N SHF : (V, E); 1903
S={vi }i=1
bnc
2
are only dual maximal SuperHyperDimension for 1904
N SHF : (V, E). 1905
Proposition 12.0.47. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Extreme SuperHyperGraph. Then following 1906
statements hold; 1907
(i) if s ≥ t and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is an t-SuperHyperDefensive 1908

SuperHyperDimension, then S is an s-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 1909
(ii) if s ≤ t and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is a dual t-SuperHyperDefensive 1910

SuperHyperDimension, then S is a dual s-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 1911
Proposition 12.0.48. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Extreme SuperHyperGraph. Then following 1912
statements hold; 1913
(i) if s ≥ t + 2 and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is an t-SuperHyperDefensive 1914

SuperHyperDimension, then S is an s-SuperHyperPowerful SuperHyperDimension; 1915

SuperHyperDimension, then S is a dual s-SuperHyperPowerful SuperHyperDimension. 1917
Proposition 12.0.49. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a[an] [V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Extreme 1918

SuperHyperGraph. Then following statements hold; 1919
(i) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| b 2r c + 1, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1922
(iii) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is an V-SuperHyperDefensive 1924

(iv) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual V-SuperHyperDefensive 1926

Proposition 12.0.50. Let ESHG : (V, E) is a[an] [V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Extreme 1928

(i) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| b 2r c + 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1932

(iii) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is an V-SuperHyperDefensive 1934

(iv) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual V-SuperHyperDefensive 1936


SuperHyperGraph which is a SuperHyperComplete. Then following statements hold; 1939
(i) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| b O−1

2 c + 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1942
(iii) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is an (O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive 1944

(iv) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual (O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive 1946


(i) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| b O−1

2 c+1, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1952
(iii) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is (O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive 1954
(iv) if ∀a ∈ V \S, |Ns (a)∩V \S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual (O−1)-SuperHyperDefensive 1956

SuperHyperGraph which is SuperHyperDimension. Then following statements hold; 1959
(i) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < 2 if ESHG : (V, E)) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDi- 1960
mension; 1961
(ii) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > 2 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1962

(iii) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1964

(iv) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1966

(i) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < 2, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1970

(ii) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > 2, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1972
(iii) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1974

(iv) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1976


CHAPTER 13 1978
Extreme Applications in Cancer’s Extreme 1979
Recognition 1980
The cancer is the Extreme disease but the Extreme model is going to figure out what’s going on 1981
this Extreme phenomenon. The special Extreme case of this Extreme disease is considered and 1982
disease but the moves of the cancer in the special region are the matter of mind. The Extreme 1984
recognition of the cancer could help to find some Extreme treatments for this Extreme disease. 1985
In the following, some Extreme steps are Extreme devised on this disease. 1986
Step 1. (Extreme Definition) The Extreme recognition of the cancer in the long-term Extreme 1987
function. 1988
Step 2. (Extreme Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the Extreme model [it’s called 1989
Extreme SuperHyperGraph] and the long Extreme cycle of the move from the cancer is 1990
identified by this research. Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified 1991
since there are some determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the 1992
effects of the cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said 1993
to be Extreme SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s happened and 1994
what’s done. 1995
Step 3. (Extreme Model) There are some specific Extreme models, which are well-known and 1996
they’ve got the names, and some general Extreme models. The moves and the Extreme 1997
traces of the cancer on the complex tracks and between complicated groups of cells could 1998
be fantasized by a Extreme SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperDimension, SuperHyperStar, 1999
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to find 2000
either the Extreme SuperHyperDimension or the Extreme SuperHyperDimension in those 2001
Extreme Extreme SuperHyperModels. 2002
95
CHAPTER 14 2003
Case 1: The Initial Extreme Steps 2004
Toward Extreme SuperHyperBipartite 2005
as Extreme SuperHyperModel 2006
Step 4. (Extreme Solution) In the Extreme Figure (34.1), the Extreme SuperHyperBipartite is 2007
Extreme highlighted and Extreme featured. 2008
By using the Extreme Figure (34.1) and the Table (34.1), the Extreme SuperHyperBipartite 2009
is obtained. 2010
The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by the Extreme Algorithm in previous Extreme result, 2011
Figure 14.1: a Extreme SuperHyperBipartite Associated to the Notions of Extreme SuperHyper-

Dimension 136NSHGaa21aa
97
Belong to The Extreme SuperHyperBipartite

136TBLaa21aa
of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of the connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : 2012

(V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel (34.1), is the Extreme SuperHyperDimension. 2013

CHAPTER 15 2014
Case 2: The Increasing Extreme Steps 2015
Toward Extreme 2016
SuperHyperMultipartite as Extreme 2017
SuperHyperModel 2018
Step 4. (Extreme Solution) In the Extreme Figure (35.1), the Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite 2019
is Extreme highlighted and Extreme featured. 2020
By using the Extreme Figure (35.1) and the Table (35.1), the Extreme SuperHyperMulti- 2021
partite is obtained. 2022
The obtained Extreme SuperHyperSet, by the Extreme Algorithm in previous result, 2023
Figure 15.1: a Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of Extreme

SuperHyperDimension 136NSHGaa22aa
99
Belong to The Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite

136TBLaa22aa
of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of the connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite 2024

ESHM : (V, E), in the Extreme SuperHyperModel (35.1), is the Extreme SuperHyperDi- 2025
mension. 2026

CHAPTER 16 2027
Wondering Open Problems But As The 2028
Directions To Forming The Motivations 2029
In what follows, some “problems” and some “questions” are proposed. 2030
The SuperHyperDimension and the Extreme SuperHyperDimension are defined on a real-world 2031
application, titled “Cancer’s Recognitions”. 2032
Question 16.0.1. Which the else SuperHyperModels could be defined based on Cancer’s 2033
recognitions? 2034
Question 16.0.2. Are there some SuperHyperNotions related to SuperHyperDimension and the 2035
Extreme SuperHyperDimension? 2036
Question 16.0.3. Are there some Algorithms to be defined on the SuperHyperModels to compute 2037
them? 2038
Question 16.0.4. Which the SuperHyperNotions are related to beyond the SuperHyperDimension 2039
and the Extreme SuperHyperDimension? 2040
Problem 16.0.5. The SuperHyperDimension and the Extreme SuperHyperDimension do a 2041

SuperHyperModel for the Cancer’s recognitions and they’re based on SuperHyperDimension, 2042
are there else? 2043
Problem 16.0.6. Which the fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are related to these SuperHyper- 2044
Numbers types-results? 2045
Problem 16.0.7. What’s the independent research based on Cancer’s recognitions concerning the 2046
multiple types of SuperHyperNotions? 2047
101
CHAPTER 17 2048
Conclusion and Closing Remarks 2049
In this section, concluding remarks and closing remarks are represented. The drawbacks of this 2050
research are illustrated. Some benefits and some advantages of this research are highlighted. 2051
This research uses some approaches to make Extreme SuperHyperGraphs more understandable. 2052
In this endeavor, two SuperHyperNotions are defined on the SuperHyperDimension. For 2053
that sake in the second definition, the main definition of the Extreme SuperHyperGraph is 2054
redefined on the position of the alphabets. Based on the new definition for the Extreme 2055
SuperHyperGraph, the new SuperHyperNotion, Extreme SuperHyperDimension, finds the 2056
convenient background to implement some results based on that. Some SuperHyperClasses 2057
and some Extreme SuperHyperClasses are the cases of this research on the modeling of the 2058
regions where are under the attacks of the cancer to recognize this disease as it’s mentioned 2059
on the title “Cancer’s Recognitions”. To formalize the instances on the SuperHyperNotion, 2060
SuperHyperDimension, the new SuperHyperClasses and SuperHyperClasses, are introduced. 2061
Some general results are gathered in the section on the SuperHyperDimension and the Extreme 2062
SuperHyperDimension. The clarifications, instances and literature reviews have taken the 2063
whole way through. In this research, the literature reviews have fulfilled the lines containing 2064
the notions and the results. The SuperHyperGraph and Extreme SuperHyperGraph are the 2065
SuperHyperModels on the “Cancer’s Recognitions” and both bases are the background of this 2066
based on the connectivities of the moves of the cancer in the longest and strongest styles with 2069
embedded styles to figure out the background for the SuperHyperNotions. In the Table (37.1), 2072
benefits and avenues for this research are, figured out, pointed out and spoken out. 2073
103
Table 17.1: An Overlook On This Research And Beyond 136TBLTBL
Advantages Limitations
1. Redefining Extreme SuperHyperGraph 1. General Results
2. SuperHyperDimension
3. Extreme SuperHyperDimension 2. Other SuperHyperNumbers
4. Modeling of Cancer’s Recognitions
5. SuperHyperClasses 3. SuperHyperFamilies

CHAPTER 18 2074
ExtremeSuperHyperDuality But As The 2075
Extensions Excerpt From Dense And 2076
Super Forms 2077
Definition 18.0.1. (Different ExtremeTypes of ExtremeSuperHyperDuality). 2078

Assume an ExtremeSuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider an 2079
ExtremeSuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } and E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then either V 0 or E 0 2080

is called 2081
(i) Extremee-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Ei ∈ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 such that 2082

Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 2083
(ii) Extremere-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Ei ∈ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 such that 2084
Va ∈ Ei , Ej and |Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 2085
(iii) Extremev-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Vi ∈ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 such that 2086

Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 2087
(iv) Extremerv-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Vi ∈ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 such that 2088

Vi , Vj ∈ Ea and |Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 2089
(v) ExtremeSuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Extremee-SuperHyperDuality, Extremere- 2090
SuperHyperDuality, Extremev-SuperHyperDuality, and Extremerv-SuperHyperDuality. 2091
Definition 18.0.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDuality). 2092

ExtremeSuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 2094
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Extremee-SuperHyperDuality, 2095

Extremere-SuperHyperDuality, Extremev-SuperHyperDuality, and Extremerv-SuperHyperDuality
2096
and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme 2097
cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 2098
SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges and 2099
Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperDuality; 2100
105
(ii) a ExtremeSuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Extremee-SuperHyperDuality, Extremere- 2101

SuperHyperDuality, Extremev-SuperHyperDuality, and Extremerv-SuperHyperDuality 2102
and C(N SHG) for a ExtremeSuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 2103
Extremecardinality of the ExtremeSuperHyperEdges of an ExtremeSuperHyperSet S of high 2104
Extremecardinality consecutive ExtremeSuperHyperEdges and ExtremeSuperHyperVertices 2105
such that they form the ExtremeSuperHyperDuality; 2106
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Extremee- 2107

SuperHyperDuality, Extremere-SuperHyperDuality, Extremev-SuperHyperDuality, and 2108
Extremerv-SuperHyperDuality and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : 2109

(V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme coefficients defined as 2110
the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges 2111
of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme 2112
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme 2113
SuperHyperDuality; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; 2114
(iv) a ExtremeSuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Extremee- 2115

Extremerv-SuperHyperDuality and C(N SHG) for an ExtremeSuperHyperGraph N SHG : 2117
(V, E) is the ExtremeSuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extremecoefficients defined as the 2118

Extremenumber of the maximum Extremecardinality of the ExtremeSuperHyperEdges of an 2119
ExtremeSuperHyperSet S of high Extremecardinality consecutive ExtremeSuperHyperEdges 2120
and ExtremeSuperHyperVertices such that they form the ExtremeSuperHyperDuality; and 2121
the Extremepower is corresponded to its Extremecoefficient; 2122
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Extremee-SuperHyperDuality, 2123

2124
SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges 2127
and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperDuality; 2128
(vi) a ExtremeR-SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Extremee-SuperHyperDuality, 2129

2130
and C(N SHG) for an ExtremeSuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Ex- 2131
tremecardinality of the ExtremeSuperHyperVertices of an ExtremeSuperHyperSet S of high 2132
such that they form the ExtremeSuperHyperDuality; 2134
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 2135

Extremee-SuperHyperDuality, Extremere-SuperHyperDuality, Extremev-SuperHyperDuality, 2136
and Extremerv-SuperHyperDuality and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 2137
N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme coefficients 2138
defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 2139
SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consec- 2140
utive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2141
the Extreme SuperHyperDuality; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 2142
coefficient; 2143

(viii) a ExtremeSuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Extremee- 2144

Extremerv-SuperHyperDuality and C(N SHG) for an ExtremeSuperHyperGraph N SHG : 2146
Extremenumber of the maximum Extremecardinality of the ExtremeSuperHyperVertices 2148
of an ExtremeSuperHyperSet S of high Extremecardinality consecutive ExtremeSuperHy- 2149
perEdges and ExtremeSuperHyperVertices such that they form the ExtremeSuperHyper- 2150
Duality; and the Extremepower is corresponded to its Extremecoefficient. 2151
136EXM1 Example 18.0.3. Assume an ExtremeSuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E) 2152
in the mentioned ExtremeFigures in every Extremeitems. 2153
• On the Figure (30.1), the ExtremeSuperHyperNotion, namely, ExtremeSuperHyperDuality, 2154

is up. The ExtremeAlgorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. E1 and E3 are some 2155
empty Extreme SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop ExtremeSuperHyperEdge and E4 2156
is an ExtremeSuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of ExtremeSuperHyperNeighbor, 2157
there’s only one ExtremeSuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The ExtremeSuperHyperVertex, 2158

V3 is Extremeisolated means that there’s no ExtremeSuperHyperEdge has it as an 2159
Extremeendpoint. Thus the ExtremeSuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given 2160
ExtremeSuperHyperDuality. 2161
C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperDuality = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperDuality = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.

is up. The ExtremeAlgorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. E1 , E2 and E3 are some 2163
empty ExtremeSuperHyperEdges but E4 is an ExtremeSuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms 2164
of ExtremeSuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one ExtremeSuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . 2165
The ExtremeSuperHyperVertex, V3 is Extremeisolated means that there’s no ExtremeSupe- 2166
rHyperEdge has it as an Extremeendpoint. Thus the ExtremeSuperHyperVertex, V3 , is 2167
excluded in every given ExtremeSuperHyperDuality. 2168


is up. The ExtremeAlgorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 2170



C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperDuality = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperDuality = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .


C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperDuality = {E3i+13i=0 , E3i+243i=0 }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial 6z 8 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperDuality = {V3i+17i=0 }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperDuality = {E15 , E16 , E17 }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperDuality = {V3 , V13 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 5 × 5z 3 .


4 × 5 × 5z 3 .


C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperDuality = {E3i+13i=0 , E23 }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperDuality = {V3i+13i=0 , V15 }.


4 × 5 × 5z 3 .


3 × 3z 2 .

C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperDuality = {V1 , Vii610=5,7,8 }.
i=4


3 × 3z 2 .







(2 × 1 × 2) + (2 × 4 × 5)z.


(1 × 1 × 2)z.


(2 × 2 × 2)z.


C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperDuality = {E3i+1i=03 }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperDuality = {V2i+1i=05 }.






C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
= 10 × 9 + 10 × 6 + 12 × 9 + 12 × 6z 2 .
The previous Extremeapproach apply on the upcoming Extremeresults on ExtremeSuperHy- 2209

perClasses. 2210

Proposition 18.0.4. Assume a connected ExtremeSuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). Then 2211
C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperDuality =
|EESHG:(V,E) |ExtremeCardinality
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperDuality
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1 3

.
Y |EESHG:(V,E) |ExtremeCardinality
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |ExtremeCardinality z 3 .
Proof. Let 2212
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |ExtremeCardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |ExtremeCardinality .
3 3
be a longest path taken from a connected ExtremeSuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). There’s a 2213

ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperDuality. The latter is straightforward. 2216
136EXM18a Example 18.0.5. In the Figure (31.1), the connected ExtremeSuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E), 2217
is highlighted and featured. The ExtremeSuperHyperSet, in the ExtremeSuperHyperModel 2218
(31.1), is the SuperHyperDuality. 2219
Proposition 18.0.6. Assume a connected ExtremeSuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). Then 2220
C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperDuality =
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperDuality


.
Proof. Let 2221
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3
be a longest path taken from a connected ExtremeSuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). There’s a 2222

136EXM19a Example 18.0.7. In the Figure (31.2), the connected ExtremeSuperHyperCycle N SHC : (V, E), 2226
is highlighted and featured. The obtained ExtremeSuperHyperSet, in the ExtremeSuperHyper- 2227
Model (31.2), is the Extreme SuperHyperDuality. 2228
Proposition 18.0.8. Assume a connected ExtremeSuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). Then 2229
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi-SuperHyperDuality = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|ExtremeCardinality |z.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 2230
P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei , CEN T ER, VjEXT ERN AL .

be a longest path taken a connected ExtremeSuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). There’s a new way 2231
to redefine as 2232


136EXM20a Example 18.0.9. In the Figure (31.3), the connected ExtremeSuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), 2235
is highlighted and featured. The obtained ExtremeSuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous 2236
Extremeresult, of the ExtremeSuperHyperVertices of the connected ExtremeSuperHyperStar 2237
ESHS : (V, E), in the ExtremeSuperHyperModel (31.3), is the ExtremeSuperHyperDuality. 2238
Proposition 18.0.10. Assume a connected ExtremeSuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). Then 2239
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi-SuperHyperDuality
= {Ei ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | = min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
X
=( (min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |)choose|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |)
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
= {ViEXT ERN AL ∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
EXT ERN AL |
ExtremeCardinality
Proof. Let 2240
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1
is a longest path taken from a connected ExtremeSuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). There’s 2241

ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperDuality. The latter is straightforward. Then there’s 2244
at least one SuperHyperDuality. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions 2245
based on SuperHyperDuality could be applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every 2246
SuperHyperPart could have one SuperHyperVertex as the representative in the 2247
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,

...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmini |Pi
is a longest SuperHyperDuality taken from a connected ExtremeSuperHyperBipartite ESHB : 2248

(V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only minimum-Neutrosophic-of-SuperHyperPart 2249
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
136EXM21a Example 18.0.11. In the ExtremeFigure (31.4), the connected ExtremeSuperHyperBipartite 2252
ESHB : (V, E), is Extremehighlighted and Extremefeatured. The obtained ExtremeSuperHyper- 2253
Set, by the ExtremeAlgorithm in previous Extremeresult, of the ExtremeSuperHyperVertices of 2254
the connected ExtremeSuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the ExtremeSuperHyperModel 2255
(31.4), is the Extreme SuperHyperDuality. 2256
Proposition 18.0.12. Assume a connected ExtremeSuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). 2257

Then 2258
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
EXT ERN AL |
ExtremeCardinality
Proof. Let 2259
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL

is a longest SuperHyperDuality taken from a connected ExtremeSuperHyperMultipartite 2260


based on SuperHyperDuality could be applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every 2265
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest path taken from a connected ExtremeSuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). 2267
Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only minimum-Neutrosophic-of-SuperHyperPart 2268
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest path taken from a connected ExtremeSuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). The 2270
136EXM22a Example 18.0.13. In the Figure (31.5), the connected ExtremeSuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : 2272
(V, E), is highlighted and Extremefeatured. The obtained ExtremeSuperHyperSet, by the 2273
Algorithm in previous Extremeresult, of the ExtremeSuperHyperVertices of the connected 2274
ExtremeSuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the ExtremeSuperHyperModel (31.5), is 2275

the ExtremeSuperHyperDuality. 2276
Proposition 18.0.14. Assume a connected ExtremeSuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). Then, 2277
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi-SuperHyperDuality = {E ∗ ∈ EESHG:(V,E)

∗
}.
= |i | Ei∗ ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|
∗
ExtremeCardinality
|z.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

Proof. Let 2278
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1∗ ,
...,
∗ EXT ERN AL
E|E ∗ | , V|E ∗ |ExtremeCardinality +1
ESHG:(V,E) ExtremeCardinality ESHG:(V,E)
is a longest SuperHyperDuality taken from a connected ExtremeSuperHyperWheel ESHW : 2279


∃!Ez∗ ∈ EESHG:(V,E)
∗
, ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez∗ ≡
∗
, {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez∗ .
based on SuperHyperDuality could be applied. The unique embedded SuperHyperDuality 2284
proposes some longest SuperHyperDuality excerpt from some representatives. The latter is 2285
straightforward. 2286
136EXM23a Example 18.0.15. In the ExtremeFigure (31.6), the connected ExtremeSuperHyperWheel 2287
N SHW : (V, E), is Extremehighlighted and featured. The obtained ExtremeSuperHyperSet, 2288
by the Algorithm in previous result, of the ExtremeSuperHyperVertices of the connected 2289
ExtremeSuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E), in the ExtremeSuperHyperModel (31.6), is the 2290

ExtremeSuperHyperDuality. 2291

CHAPTER 19 2292
ExtremeSuperHyperJoin But As The 2293
Super Forms 2295
Definition 19.0.1. (Different ExtremeTypes of ExtremeSuperHyperJoin). 2296

is called 2299
(i) Extremee-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 2300

and ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; 2301
(ii) Extremere-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va ∈ 2302

Ei , Ej ; ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va ∈
6 Ei , Ej ; and |Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = 2303
(iii) Extremev-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; 2305

and ∀Vi , Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; 2306
(iv) Extremerv-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such that 2307

Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; ∀Vi , Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; and |Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = 2308
(v) ExtremeSuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Extremee-SuperHyperJoin, Extremere- 2310

SuperHyperJoin, Extremev-SuperHyperJoin, and Extremerv-SuperHyperJoin. 2311
Definition 19.0.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperJoin). 2312

(i) an Extreme SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Extremee-SuperHyperJoin, Extremere- 2315

SuperHyperJoin, Extremev-SuperHyperJoin, and Extremerv-SuperHyperJoin and 2316
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme 2317
Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperJoin; 2320
119
(ii) a ExtremeSuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Extremee-SuperHyperJoin, Extremere- 2321

C(N SHG) for a ExtremeSuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extremecar- 2323
dinality of the ExtremeSuperHyperEdges of an ExtremeSuperHyperSet S of high Ex- 2324
tremecardinality consecutive ExtremeSuperHyperEdges and ExtremeSuperHyperVertices 2325
such that they form the ExtremeSuperHyperJoin; 2326
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Extremee- 2327

SuperHyperJoin, Extremere-SuperHyperJoin, Extremev-SuperHyperJoin, and Extremerv- 2328
SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is 2329
the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the 2330
Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges 2331
SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; 2334
(iv) a ExtremeSuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Extremee- 2335

SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for an ExtremeSuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 2337

is the ExtremeSuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extremecoefficients defined as the 2338
and ExtremeSuperHyperVertices such that they form the ExtremeSuperHyperJoin; and 2341
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Extremee-SuperHyperJoin, Extremere- 2343


and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperJoin; 2348
(vi) a ExtremeR-SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Extremee-SuperHyperJoin, Extremere- 2349

C(N SHG) for an ExtremeSuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extremecar- 2351
dinality of the ExtremeSuperHyperVertices of an ExtremeSuperHyperSet S of high 2352
such that they form the ExtremeSuperHyperJoin; 2354
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Extremee- 2355

the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the 2358
Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices 2359
SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; 2362

(viii) a ExtremeSuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Extremee- 2363

SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for an ExtremeSuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is 2365
the ExtremeSuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extremecoefficients defined as the Ex- 2366
tremenumber of the maximum Extremecardinality of the ExtremeSuperHyperVertices of an 2367
and ExtremeSuperHyperVertices such that they form the ExtremeSuperHyperJoin; and 2369
the Extremepower is corresponded to its Extremecoefficient. 2370
• On the Figure (30.1), the ExtremeSuperHyperNotion, namely, ExtremeSuperHyperJoin, 2373


ExtremeSuperHyperJoin. 2380
C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperJoin = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperJoin = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.

excluded in every given ExtremeSuperHyperJoin. 2387

• On the Figure (30.3), the ExtremeSuperHyperNotion, namely, ExtremeSuperHyperJoin, is 2388

up. The ExtremeAlgorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 2389



C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperJoin = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperJoin = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .


C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperJoin = {E3i+13i=0 , E3i+243i=0 }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial 6z 8 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperJoin = {V3i+17i=0 }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperJoin = {E15 , E16 , E17 }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperJoin = {V3 , V13 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 5 × 5z 3 .


4 × 5 × 5z 3 .


C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperJoin = {E3i+13i=0 , E23 }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperJoin = {V3i+13i=0 , V15 }.


4 × 5 × 5z 3 .


3 × 3z 2 .

C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperJoin = {V1 , Vii610=5,7,8 }.
i=4


3 × 3z 2 .







(1 × 5 × 5) + (1 × 2 + 1)z 3 .


C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperJoin = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .


C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperJoin = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .


C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperJoin = {E3i+1i=03 }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperJoin = {V2i+1i=05 }.






C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
= 10 × 6 + 10 × 6 + 12 × 6 + 12 × 6z 2 .

perClasses. 2429

C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperJoin =
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperJoin

.
Proof. Let 2431
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperJoin. The latter is straightforward. 2435
(31.1), is the SuperHyperJoin. 2438
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
= 3z 3 .


.
Proof. Let 2440
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

Model (31.2), is the Extreme SuperHyperJoin. 2447
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi-SuperHyperJoin = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-Quasi-SuperHyperJoin = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-Quasi-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 2449

to redefine as 2451


ESHS : (V, E), in the ExtremeSuperHyperModel (31.3), is the ExtremeSuperHyperJoin. 2457
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi-SuperHyperJoin
= (PERFECT MATCHING).
{Ei ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) ,
i
= (OTHERWISE).
{},
If ∃Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | =
6 min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |.
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
= (OTHERWISE)0.
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
EXT ERN AL |
ExtremeCardinality
Proof. Let 2459
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL


ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperJoin. The latter is straightforward. Then there’s 2463
no at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions 2464
based on SuperHyperJoin could be applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every 2465
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperJoin taken from a connected ExtremeSuperHyperBipartite ESHB : 2467

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
(31.4), is the Extreme SuperHyperJoin. 2475

Then 2477
i

= (OTHERWISE).
{},
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
= (OTHERWISE)0.
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
EXT ERN AL |
ExtremeCardinality
Proof. Let 2478
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperJoin taken from a connected ExtremeSuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : 2479


based on SuperHyperJoin could be applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every 2484
P :

V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL

the ExtremeSuperHyperJoin. 2495
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
= 3z 3 .

.
Proof. Let 2497
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

is a longest SuperHyperJoin taken from a connected ExtremeSuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). 2498
There’s a new way to redefine as 2499

ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperJoin. The latter is straightforward. Then there’s at 2501
least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based 2502
on SuperHyperJoin could be applied. The unique embedded SuperHyperJoin proposes some 2503
longest SuperHyperJoin excerpt from some representatives. The latter is straightforward. 2504
ExtremeSuperHyperJoin. 2509

CHAPTER 20 2510
ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect But As The 2511
Super Forms 2513
Definition 20.0.1. (Different ExtremeTypes of ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect). 2514


is called 2517
(i) Extremee-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , such that 2518

Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 2519
(ii) Extremere-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , such that 2520
Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; and |Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 2521
(iii) Extremev-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , such that 2522

Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 2523
(iv) Extremerv-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , such that 2524

Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; and |Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 2525
(v) ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Extremee-SuperHyperPerfect, Extremere- 2526
SuperHyperPerfect, Extremev-SuperHyperPerfect, and Extremerv-SuperHyperPerfect. 2527
Definition 20.0.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperPerfect). 2528

(i) an Extreme SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Extremee-SuperHyperPerfect, 2531

Extremere-SuperHyperPerfect, Extremev-SuperHyperPerfect, and Extremerv-SuperHyperPerfect
2532
Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; 2536
133
(ii) a ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Extremee-SuperHyperPerfect, Extremere- 2537

SuperHyperPerfect, Extremev-SuperHyperPerfect, and Extremerv-SuperHyperPerfect 2538
and C(N SHG) for a ExtremeSuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 2539
Extremecardinality of the ExtremeSuperHyperEdges of an ExtremeSuperHyperSet S of high 2540
such that they form the ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect; 2542
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Extremee- 2543

SuperHyperPerfect, Extremere-SuperHyperPerfect, Extremev-SuperHyperPerfect, and 2544
Extremerv-SuperHyperPerfect and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : 2545

(V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme coefficients defined as 2546
the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges 2547
SuperHyperPerfect; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; 2550
(iv) a ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Extremee- 2551

Extremerv-SuperHyperPerfect and C(N SHG) for an ExtremeSuperHyperGraph N SHG : 2553

and ExtremeSuperHyperVertices such that they form the ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect; and 2557
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Extremee-SuperHyperPerfect, 2559

2560
and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; 2564
(vi) a ExtremeR-SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Extremee-SuperHyperPerfect, 2565

2566
and C(N SHG) for an ExtremeSuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Ex- 2567
tremecardinality of the ExtremeSuperHyperVertices of an ExtremeSuperHyperSet S of high 2568
such that they form the ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect; 2570
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 2571

Extremee-SuperHyperPerfect, Extremere-SuperHyperPerfect, Extremev-SuperHyperPerfect, 2572
and Extremerv-SuperHyperPerfect and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 2573

the Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 2578
coefficient; 2579

(viii) a ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Extremee- 2580

Extremerv-SuperHyperPerfect and C(N SHG) for an ExtremeSuperHyperGraph N SHG : 2582
Extremenumber of the maximum Extremecardinality of the ExtremeSuperHyperVertices 2584
of an ExtremeSuperHyperSet S of high Extremecardinality consecutive ExtremeSuperHy- 2585
perEdges and ExtremeSuperHyperVertices such that they form the ExtremeSuperHyper- 2586
Perfect; and the Extremepower is corresponded to its Extremecoefficient. 2587
• On the Figure (30.1), the ExtremeSuperHyperNotion, namely, ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect, 2590


ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect. 2597
C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperPerfect = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.

excluded in every given ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect. 2604





C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperPerfect = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .


C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect = {E3i+13i=0 , E3i+243i=0 }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial 6z 8 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3i+17i=0 }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect = {E15 , E16 , E17 }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3 , V6 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .


3 × 4 × 4z 3 .


C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {E3i+13i=0 , E23 }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 5 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3i+13i=0 , V15 }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 5 .


3 × 4 × 4z 3 .


3 × 2z 2 .

C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperPerfect = {V1 , Vii610=5,7,8 }.
i=4


3 × 3z 2 .







C(N SHG)ExtremeR-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V2 , V7 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial =
(1 × 5 × 5) + (1 × 2 + 1)z 3 .


C(N SHG)ExtremeR-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .


C(N SHG)ExtremeR-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .


C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect = {E3i+1i=03 }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeR-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V2i+1i=05 }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 6 .






C(N SHG)ExtremeR-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3 , V6 }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
= 10 × 6 + 10 × 6 + 12 × 6 + 12 × 6z 2 .

perClasses. 2646

C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect =
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperPerfect

.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
Proof. Let 2648
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperPerfect. The latter is straightforward. 2652
(31.1), is the SuperHyperPerfect. 2655
C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect =
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperPerfect


.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
Proof. Let 2657
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

Model (31.2), is the Extreme SuperHyperPerfect. 2664
C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperPerfect = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
Proof. Let 2666

to redefine as 2668


ESHS : (V, E), in the ExtremeSuperHyperModel (31.3), is the ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect. 2674
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi-SuperHyperPerfect
i
= (OTHERWISE).
{},
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
= (OTHERWISE)0.
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
ExtremeCardinality
Proof. Let 2676
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL


ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperPerfect. The latter is straightforward. Then there’s 2680
no at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions 2681
based on SuperHyperPerfect could be applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every 2682
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperPerfect taken from a connected ExtremeSuperHyperBipartite ESHB : 2684

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
(31.4), is the Extreme SuperHyperPerfect. 2692

Then 2694
i

= (OTHERWISE).
{},
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
= (OTHERWISE)0.
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
ExtremeCardinality
Proof. Let 2695
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperPerfect taken from a connected ExtremeSuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : 2696


based on SuperHyperPerfect could be applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every 2701
P :

V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL

the ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect. 2712
C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperPerfect = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
Proof. Let 2714
is a longest SuperHyperPerfect taken from a connected ExtremeSuperHyperWheel ESHW : 2715



at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions 2719
based on SuperHyperPerfect could be applied. The unique embedded SuperHyperPerfect 2720
proposes some longest SuperHyperPerfect excerpt from some representatives. The latter is 2721
ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect. 2727

CHAPTER 21 2728
ExtremeSuperHyperTotal But As The 2729
Super Forms 2731
Definition 21.0.1. (Different ExtremeTypes of ExtremeSuperHyperTotal). 2732

is called 2735
(i) Extremee-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 2736
(ii) Extremere-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 2737

and |Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 2738
(iii) Extremev-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 2739
(iv) Extremerv-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 2740

and |Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 2741
(v) ExtremeSuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Extremee-SuperHyperTotal, Extremere- 2742

SuperHyperTotal, Extremev-SuperHyperTotal, and Extremerv-SuperHyperTotal. 2743
Definition 21.0.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperTotal). 2744

(i) an Extreme SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Extremee-SuperHyperTotal, Extremere- 2747

SuperHyperTotal, Extremev-SuperHyperTotal, and Extremerv-SuperHyperTotal and 2748
Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperTotal; 2752
(ii) a ExtremeSuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Extremee-SuperHyperTotal, Extremere- 2753
147
C(N SHG) for a ExtremeSuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extremecar- 2755
dinality of the ExtremeSuperHyperEdges of an ExtremeSuperHyperSet S of high Ex- 2756
such that they form the ExtremeSuperHyperTotal; 2758
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Extremee- 2759

SuperHyperTotal, Extremere-SuperHyperTotal, Extremev-SuperHyperTotal, and 2760
Extremerv-SuperHyperTotal and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : 2761

(V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme coefficients defined 2762
as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHy- 2763
perEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme 2764
SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; 2766
(iv) a ExtremeSuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Extremee- 2767

Extremerv-SuperHyperTotal and C(N SHG) for an ExtremeSuperHyperGraph N SHG : 2769
and ExtremeSuperHyperVertices such that they form the ExtremeSuperHyperTotal; and 2773
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Extremee-SuperHyperTotal, Extremere- 2775


and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperTotal; 2780
(vi) a ExtremeR-SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Extremee-SuperHyperTotal, Extremere- 2781

C(N SHG) for an ExtremeSuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extremecar- 2783
dinality of the ExtremeSuperHyperVertices of an ExtremeSuperHyperSet S of high Ex- 2784

such that they form the ExtremeSuperHyperTotal; 2786
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 2787

Extremee-SuperHyperTotal, Extremere-SuperHyperTotal, Extremev-SuperHyperTotal, 2788
and Extremerv-SuperHyperTotal and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 2789
the Extreme SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 2794
coefficient; 2795
(viii) a ExtremeSuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Extremee- 2796

Extremerv-SuperHyperTotal and C(N SHG) for an ExtremeSuperHyperGraph N SHG : 2798

(V, E) is the ExtremeSuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extremecoefficients defined 2799
as the Extremenumber of the maximum Extremecardinality of the ExtremeSuperHy- 2800
perVertices of an ExtremeSuperHyperSet S of high Extremecardinality consecutive 2801
ExtremeSuperHyperEdges and ExtremeSuperHyperVertices such that they form the 2802
ExtremeSuperHyperTotal; and the Extremepower is corresponded to its Extremecoefficient. 2803
• On the Figure (30.1), the ExtremeSuperHyperNotion, namely, ExtremeSuperHyperTotal, 2806


ExtremeSuperHyperTotal. 2813
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi-SuperHyperTotal = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.


excluded in every given ExtremeSuperHyperTotal. 2820





C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi- = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .


C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperTotal = {Ei+19i=0 }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial 20z 10 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperTotal = {Vi+19i=0 }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 20z 10 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {E12 , E13 , E14 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V12 , V13 , V14 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial 10z 10 .

C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperTotal = {Vi+19i=0 }.


3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {E1 , E6 , E7 , E8 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 4 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V5 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {E1 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , Vii68=4,5,6 }.
i=1








4 × 3z 3 .


C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V2 , V6 , V17 }.
4 × 3z 4 .


2 × 4 × 3z 4 .


C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 11z 10 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {Vi+2i=011 }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 11z 10 .



C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
= |(|V | − 1)z 2 .

C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperTotal = {E1 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V2 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {V3 , V10 , V6 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3 × 6z 3 .

perClasses. 2862
C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperTotal =
|E | −2
= {Ei }i=1ESHG:(V,E) ExtremeCardinality .
C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
= z |EESHG:(V,E) |ExtremeCardinality −2 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperTotal
|E | −2
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1ESHG:(V,E) ExtremeCardinality .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |ExtremeCardinality z |EESHG:(V,E) |ExtremeCardinality −2

Proof. Let 2864
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...

ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperTotal. The latter is straightforward. 2868
(31.1), is the SuperHyperTotal. 2871
C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperTotal =
|E | −2
= {Ei }i=1ESHG:(V,E) ExtremeCardinality .
= (|EESHG:(V,E) |ExtremeCardinality − 1)
z |EESHG:(V,E) |ExtremeCardinality −2 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperTotal
|E |ExtremeCardinality −2
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1ESHG:(V,E) .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |ExtremeCardinality z |EESHG:(V,E) |ExtremeCardinality −2
Proof. Let 2873
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E |E|EESHG:(V,E) |ExtremeCardinality −1 .
, V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |ExtremeCardinality −1


Model (31.2), is the Extreme SuperHyperTotal. 2880
C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperTotal = {Ei , Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

= |i(i − 1) | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|ExtremeCardinality |z 2 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperTotal = {CEN T ER, Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
(|VESHG:(V,E)|ExtremeCardinality |) choose (|VESHG:(V,E)|ExtremeCardinality | − 1)
z2.
Proof. Let 2882
to redefine as 2884

ESHS : (V, E), in the ExtremeSuperHyperModel (31.3), is the ExtremeSuperHyperTotal. 2890

C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperTotal
i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
ExtremeCardinality
Proof. Let 2892
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperTotal. The latter is straightforward. Then there’s 2896
no at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions 2897
based on SuperHyperTotal could be applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every 2898
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperTotal taken from a connected ExtremeSuperHyperBipartite ESHB : 2900
P :

V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

(31.4), is the Extreme SuperHyperTotal. 2908

Then 2910
i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
ExtremeCardinality
Proof. Let 2911
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperTotal taken from a connected ExtremeSuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : 2912



based on SuperHyperTotal could be applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every 2917
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
the ExtremeSuperHyperTotal. 2928
∗
C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperTotal = {Ei , Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
∗
= |i(i − 1) | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|ExtremeCardinality
|z 2 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperTotal = {CEN T ER, Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
(|VESHG:(V,E)|ExtremeCardinality |) choose (|VESHG:(V,E)|ExtremeCardinality | − 1)
z2.
Proof. Let 2930
P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei∗ , CEN T ER, Ej .
is a longest SuperHyperTotal taken from a connected ExtremeSuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). 2931


at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based 2935
on SuperHyperTotal could be applied. The unique embedded SuperHyperTotal proposes some 2936
longest SuperHyperTotal excerpt from some representatives. The latter is straightforward. 2937

ExtremeSuperHyperTotal. 2942

CHAPTER 22 2943
ExtremeSuperHyperConnected But As 2944
Super Forms 2946
Definition 22.0.1. (Different ExtremeTypes of ExtremeSuperHyperConnected). 2947

is called 2950
(i) Extremee-SuperHyperConnected if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , such that 2951
Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; and ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; 2952
(ii) Extremere-SuperHyperConnected if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , such that 2953

Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; and |Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = 2954
(iii) Extremev-SuperHyperConnected if ∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such that 2956

Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; and ∀Vi , Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; 2957
(iv) Extremerv-SuperHyperConnected if ∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such that 2958

(v) ExtremeSuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Extremee-SuperHyperConnected, 2961

Extremere-SuperHyperConnected, Extremev-SuperHyperConnected, and Extremerv- 2962
SuperHyperConnected. 2963
Definition 22.0.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperConnected). 2964

(i) an Extreme SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Extremee-SuperHyperConnected, 2967

SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 2969
is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme 2970
161
cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Ex- 2971
treme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme 2972
SuperHyperConnected; 2973
(ii) a ExtremeSuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Extremee-SuperHyperConnected, 2974

SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for a ExtremeSuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 2976
is the maximum Extremecardinality of the ExtremeSuperHyperEdges of an ExtremeSu- 2977

perHyperSet S of high Extremecardinality consecutive ExtremeSuperHyperEdges and 2978
ExtremeSuperHyperVertices such that they form the ExtremeSuperHyperConnected; 2979
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 2980

of Extremee-SuperHyperConnected, Extremere-SuperHyperConnected, Extremev- 2981
SuperHyperConnected, and Extremerv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for an 2982
Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial con- 2983

tains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme 2984
tices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperConnected; and the Extreme power is 2987
(iv) a ExtremeSuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 2989

ExtremeSuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the ExtremeSuperHyperPolynomial contains 2992
the Extremecoefficients defined as the Extremenumber of the maximum Extremecardinality 2993
of the ExtremeSuperHyperEdges of an ExtremeSuperHyperSet S of high Extremecardinality 2994
consecutive ExtremeSuperHyperEdges and ExtremeSuperHyperVertices such that they 2995

form the ExtremeSuperHyperConnected; and the Extremepower is corresponded to its 2996
Extremecoefficient; 2997
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Extremee-SuperHyperConnected, 2998

SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 3000

cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of 3002
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 3003
Extreme SuperHyperConnected; 3004
(vi) a ExtremeR-SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Extremee-SuperHyperConnected, 3005

SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for an ExtremeSuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 3007

is the maximum Extremecardinality of the ExtremeSuperHyperVertices of an ExtremeSu- 3008
perHyperSet S of high Extremecardinality consecutive ExtremeSuperHyperEdges and 3009
ExtremeSuperHyperVertices such that they form the ExtremeSuperHyperConnected; 3010
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 3011


Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial con- 3014

tains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme 3015
(viii) a ExtremeSuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 3020

ExtremeSuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the ExtremeSuperHyperPolynomial contains 3023
the Extremecoefficients defined as the Extremenumber of the maximum Extremecardinality 3024
of the ExtremeSuperHyperVertices of an ExtremeSuperHyperSet S of high Extremecar- 3025

dinality consecutive ExtremeSuperHyperEdges and ExtremeSuperHyperVertices such that 3026
they form the ExtremeSuperHyperConnected; and the Extremepower is corresponded to 3027
its Extremecoefficient. 3028
• On the Figure (30.1), the ExtremeSuperHyperNotion, namely, ExtremeSuperHyperCon- 3031

nected, is up. The ExtremeAlgorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. E1 and E3 are 3032
some empty Extreme SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop ExtremeSuperHyperEdge and E4 3033
is an ExtremeSuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of ExtremeSuperHyperNeighbor, there’s 3034

only one ExtremeSuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The ExtremeSuperHyperVertex, V3 is Ex- 3035
tremeisolated means that there’s no ExtremeSuperHyperEdge has it as an Extremeendpoint. 3036
Thus the ExtremeSuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given ExtremeSuperHyper- 3037
Connected. 3038
C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperConnected = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperConnected = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.
• On the Figure (30.2), the ExtremeSuperHyperNotion, namely, ExtremeSuperHyperConnec- 3039

ted, is up. The ExtremeAlgorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. E1 , E2 and E3 are 3040
some empty ExtremeSuperHyperEdges but E4 is an ExtremeSuperHyperEdge. Thus in the 3041
terms of ExtremeSuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one ExtremeSuperHyperEdge, namely, 3042
E4 . The ExtremeSuperHyperVertex, V3 is Extremeisolated means that there’s no Ex- 3043
tremeSuperHyperEdge has it as an Extremeendpoint. Thus the ExtremeSuperHyperVertex, 3044
V3 , is excluded in every given ExtremeSuperHyperConnected. 3045



ted, is up. The ExtremeAlgorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 3047

C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperConnected = {E1 , E2 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .


C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi-SuperHyperConnected = {Ei+19i=0 }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial 20z 10 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {Vi+19i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {E12 , E13 , E14 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected = {V12 , V13 , V14 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .


C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial 10z 10 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperConnected = {Vi+119
i=11
, V22 }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 20z 10 .

nected, is up. The ExtremeAlgorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 3061
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {E5 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E1 , E6 , E7 , E8 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 4 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V5 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {E1 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 5z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , Vii68=4,5,6 }.
i=1
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 5 .

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E3 , E9 , E6 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V5 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .



C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.


C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V2 , V3 , V4 }.


4 × 3z 3 .


C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V2 , V6 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 3z 4 .


2 × 4 × 3z 4 .



C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 11z 10 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {Vi+2i=011 }.


C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 10z.



C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E3 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3 × 6z 3 .

perClasses. 3087

C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi-SuperHyperConnected =
|EESHG:(V,E) |
ExtremeCardinality
−2
= {Ei }i=1 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |ExtremeCardinality −2
=z .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
|E | −2
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |ExtremeCardinality z ESHG:(V,E) ExtremeCardinality
Proof. Let 3089
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E|EESHG:(V,E) |ExtremeCardinality −1 , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |ExtremeCardinality −1 .

ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperConnected. The latter is straightforward. 3093
(31.1), is the SuperHyperConnected. 3096
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi-SuperHyperConnected =
= {Ei }i=1 .
= (|EESHG:(V,E) |ExtremeCardinality − 1)
z .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected

= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1 .
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
|E | −2
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |ExtremeCardinality z ESHG:(V,E) ExtremeCardinality
Proof. Let 3098
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E|EESHG:(V,E) |ExtremeCardinality −1 , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |ExtremeCardinality −1 .

Model (31.2), is the Extreme SuperHyperConnected. 3105
C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperConnected = {Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ |EESHG:(V,E) |ExtremeCardinality z.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperConnected = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeR-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 3107

to redefine as 3109


ESHS : (V, E), in the ExtremeSuperHyperModel (31.3), is the ExtremeSuperHyperConnected. 3115
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi-SuperHyperConnected
i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
C(N SHG)ExtremeV-SuperHyperConnected
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)ExtremeV-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
ExtremeCardinality
Proof. Let 3117
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperConnected. The latter is straightforward. Then 3121
there’s no at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of quasi may be up but 3122
the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperConnected could be applied. There are only 3123
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

is a longest SuperHyperConnected taken from a connected ExtremeSuperHyperBipartite 3126

ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only minimum-Neutrosophic-of- 3127
SuperHyperPart SuperHyperEdges are attained in any solution 3128
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
(31.4), is the Extreme SuperHyperConnected. 3134

Then 3136
C(N SHG)ExtremeQuasi-SuperHyperConnected
i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
C(N SHG)ExtremeV-SuperHyperConnected
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)ExtremeV-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
ExtremeCardinality
Proof. Let 3137
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperConnected taken from a connected ExtremeSuperHyperMultipartite 3138


P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

the ExtremeSuperHyperConnected. 3155
∗
C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperConnected = {Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeSuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ |E ∗ ESHG:(V,E) |ExtremeCardinality |z.
C(N SHG)ExtremeV-SuperHyperConnected = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)ExtremeV-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 3157
is a longest SuperHyperConnected taken from a connected ExtremeSuperHyperWheel ESHW : 3158



to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperConnected. The latter is straightforward. 3161
Then there’s at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and 3162
the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperConnected could be applied. The unique 3163
embedded SuperHyperConnected proposes some longest SuperHyperConnected excerpt from 3164

ExtremeSuperHyperConnected. 3170

CHAPTER 23 3171
Background 3172


175












– 3329

Bibliography 3330

10.33140/JMTCM.01.03.09) 3341

tps://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 3356
179
prints202301.0282.v1). 3363
10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1). 3366
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 3371
prints202301.0262.v1). 3375
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 3381
prints202301.0105.v1). 3384
Preprints 2023, 2023010044 3390
10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 3393

(doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 3402

10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 3409
10.13140/RG.2.2.21510.45125). 3421
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13121.84321). 3424

10.13140/RG.2.2.11758.69441). 3427
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31891.35367). 3430
10.13140/RG.2.2.19360.87048). 3433
10.13140/RG.2.2.32363.21286). 3436

10.13140/RG.2.2.23266.81602). 3439
10.13140/RG.2.2.19911.37285). 3442
10.13140/RG.2.2.11050.90569). 3445
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17761.79206). 3448
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33275.80161). 3454
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30182.50241). 3457

2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17252.24968). 3490
2023010396 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 3502

2023, 2023010395 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 3505



2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36745.93289). 3519


10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 3526
prints202301.0267.v1).). 3529

(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 3534
prints202301.0262.v1). 3538

2023010224, (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 3544

10.13140/RG.2.2.35061.65767). 3547
10.13140/RG.2.2.18494.15680). 3551

10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 3555
10.13140/RG.2.2.15897.70243). 3559
10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 3563

prints202301.0105.v1). 3566

10.13140/RG.2.2.23172.19849). 3573
Preprints 2023, 2023010044 3585
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 3588
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28945.92007). 3591


10.13140/RG.2.2.35774.77123). 3597
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 3603

(doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 3609
10.13140/RG.2.2.19380.94084). 3612
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 3623

10.13140/RG.2.2.20993.12640). 3626


10.13140/RG.2.2.29173.86244). 3641

CHAPTER 24 3651
Cancer In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 3652
The cancer is the Neutrosophic disease but the Neutrosophic model is going to figure out what’s 3653
going on this Neutrosophic phenomenon. The special Neutrosophic case of this Neutrosophic 3654
disease is considered and as the consequences of the model, some parameters are used. The 3655
cells are under attack of this disease but the moves of the cancer in the special region are the 3656
matter of mind. The Neutrosophic recognition of the cancer could help to find some Neutrosophic 3657
treatments for this Neutrosophic disease. 3658
In the following, some Neutrosophic steps are Neutrosophic devised on this disease. 3659
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) The Neutrosophic recognition of the cancer in the long-term 3660
Neutrosophic function. 3661
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the Neutrosophic model 3662
[it’s called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] and the long Neutrosophic cycle of the move 3663
easily identified since there are some determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the 3665
moves and the effects of the cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another 3666
model [it’s said to be Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on 3667
what’s happened and what’s done. 3668
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models, which are well- 3669
known and they’ve got the names, and some general Neutrosophic models. The moves and 3670
the Neutrosophic traces of the cancer on the complex tracks and between complicated groups 3671
of cells could be fantasized by a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperDimension, 3672
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The 3673
aim is to find either the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension or the Neutrosophic 3674
SuperHyperDimension in those Neutrosophic Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. 3675
Some cells have been faced with some attacks from the situation which is caused by the 3676
cancer’s attacks. In this case, there are some embedded analysis on the ongoing situations 3677
which in that, the cells could be labelled as some groups and some groups or individuals have 3678
excessive labels which all are raised from the behaviors to overcome the cancer’s attacks. In 3679
the embedded situations, the individuals of cells and the groups of cells could be considered 3680
as “new groups”. Thus it motivates us to find the proper SuperHyperModels for getting more 3681
proper analysis on this messy story. I’ve found the SuperHyperModels which are officially called 3682
“SuperHyperGraphs” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. In this SuperHyperModel, the 3683
189
cells and the groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” and the relations between 3684
called “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. The cancer is the disease but the model is going to 3692
figure out what’s going on this phenomenon. The special case of this disease is considered and 3693
disease but the moves of the cancer in the special region are the matter of mind. The recognition 3695
of the cancer could help to find some treatments for this disease. The SuperHyperGraph and 3696
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are the SuperHyperModels on the “Cancer’s Recognition” and 3697
both bases are the background of this research. Sometimes the cancer has been happened on the 3698
region, full of cells, groups of cells and embedded styles. In this segment, the SuperHyperModel 3699
proposes some SuperHyperNotions based on the connectivities of the moves of the cancer in the 3700
forms of alliances’ styles with the formation of the design and the architecture are formally called “ 3701
The recognition of the cancer in the long-term function. The specific region has been assigned 3704
by the model [it’s called SuperHyperGraph] and the long cycle of the move from the cancer is 3705
identified by this research. Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since 3706
there are some determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 3707
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be Neutrosophic 3708
SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s happened and what’s done. There 3709
are some specific models, which are well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general 3710
models. The moves and the traces of the cancer on the complex tracks and between complicated 3711
groups of cells could be fantasized by a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperDimension, 3712
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is 3713
to find either the optimal SuperHyperDimension or the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in 3714

those Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. Some general results are introduced. Beyond that in 3715
SuperHyperStar, all possible Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath s have only two SuperHyperEdges 3716
but it’s not enough since it’s essential to have at least three SuperHyperEdges to form any style 3717
of a SuperHyperDimension. There isn’t any formation of any SuperHyperDimension but literarily, 3718
Thus it motivates us to define different types of “ SuperHyperDimension” and “Neutrosophic 3727
SuperHyperDimension” on “SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. Then the 3728

Some SuperHyperClasses and some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses are the cases of this research 3734
on the modeling of the regions where are under the attacks of the cancer to recognize this 3735
disease as it’s mentioned on the title “Cancer’s Recognitions”. To formalize the instances on the 3736
SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperDimension, the new SuperHyperClasses and SuperHyperClasses, 3737
are introduced. Some general results are gathered in the section on the SuperHyperDimension 3738
and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension. The clarifications, instances and literature reviews 3739
have taken the whole way through. In this scientific research, the literature reviews have fulfilled 3740
the lines containing the notions and the results. The SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 3741
SuperHyperGraph are the SuperHyperModels on the “Cancer’s Recognitions” and both bases are 3742
the background of this research. Sometimes the cancer has been happened on the region, full 3743
of cells, groups of cells and embedded styles. In this scientific segment, the SuperHyperModel 3744
proposes some SuperHyperNotions based on the connectivities of the moves of the cancer in 3745
the longest and strongest styles with the formation of the design and the architecture are 3746
formally called “ SuperHyperDimension” in the themes of jargons and buzzwords. The prefix 3747
“SuperHyper” refers to the theme of the embedded styles to figure out the background for the 3748
SuperHyperNotions. 3749

CHAPTER 25 3750
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension 3751
Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions Of SuperHyperDu- 3752
ality In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 3753
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34953.52320). 3754

Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph By 3755
SuperHyperDuality As Hyper Imaginations On Super Mixed-Illustrations”, ResearchGate 2023, 3756
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33275.80161). 3757
10.13140/RG.2.2.11050.90569). 3760
Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of SuperHyper- 3761
Join In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3762
10.13140/RG.2.2.17761.79206). 3763
10.13140/RG.2.2.19911.37285). 3766
Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of SuperHyperPerfect 3767
10.13140/RG.2.2.23266.81602). 3769
10.13140/RG.2.2.19360.87048). 3772
Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of SuperHyperTotal 3773
10.13140/RG.2.2.32363.21286). 3775
10.13140/RG.2.2.11758.69441). 3778
Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of SuperHyperConnected 3779
10.13140/RG.2.2.31891.35367). 3781
10.13140/RG.2.2.21510.45125). 3784
193
Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of SuperHyperDominating 3785
10.13140/RG.2.2.13121.84321). 3787

CHAPTER 26 3788
New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And 3789
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By 3790
SuperHyperDimension As Hyper 3791
Distinguishing On Super Distances 3792
195
CHAPTER 27 3793
ABSTRACT 3794
In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension). 3795

Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } and E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then either V 0 or 3797

E 0 is called Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension if ∀Ea , Eb ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ec ∈ E 0 , such 3798
that d(Ea , Ec ) 6= d(Eb , Ec ); Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension if ∀Ea , Eb ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ 3799
E 0 , ∃Ec ∈ E 0 , such that d(Ea , Ec ) 6= d(Eb , Ec ); and |Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = 3800
|Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDimension if ∀Va , Vb ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ 3801
V 0 , ∃Vc ∈ V 0 , such that d(Va , Vc ) 6= d(Vb , Vc ); Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension if ∀Va , Vb ∈ 3802
VESHG:(V,E) \V 0 , ∃Vc ∈ V 0 , such that d(Va , Vc ) 6= d(Vb , Vc ); and |Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = 3803
|Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neut- 3804
rosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic v- 3805
SuperHyperDimension, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension. ((Neutrosophic) Super- 3806
HyperDimension). Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair 3807
S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is 3808
called an Extreme SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, 3809

rv-SuperHyperDimension and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is 3811
the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of 3812
the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges 3813
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, Neut- 3815

is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neut- 3818
SuperHyperDimension; an Extreme SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 3821

the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinal- 3825
ity of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme car- 3826
dinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that 3827
197
they form the Extreme SuperHyperDimension; and the Extreme power is corresponded to 3828
its Extreme coefficient; a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 3829
either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, Neut- 3830
rosophic v-SuperHyperDimension, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension and C(N SHG) 3831
for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolyno- 3832
mial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the max- 3833
imum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic Su- 3834

perHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 3835
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDi- 3836
mension; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient; an Ex- 3837
treme V-SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, Neut- 3838
rv-SuperHyperDimension and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the 3840
maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the 3841
Extreme SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges 3842
Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, 3844
is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neut- 3847
SuperHyperDimension; an Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 3850

the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality 3854
of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardin- 3855
ality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they 3856
form the Extreme SuperHyperDimension; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Ex- 3857
treme coefficient; a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 3858

Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic 3859
v-SuperHyperDimension, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension and C(N SHG) for a Neut- 3860
rosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial contains 3861
the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutro- 3862
sophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 3863

S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutro- 3864
sophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension; and the 3865
Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient. In this scientific research, 3866
new setting is introduced for new SuperHyperNotions, namely, a SuperHyperDimension and 3867
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension. Two different types of SuperHyperDefinitions are debut 3868
for them but the research goes further and the SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and 3869
SuperHyperClass based on that are well-defined and well-reviewed. The literature review is 3870
implemented in the whole of this research. For shining the elegancy and the significancy of this 3871
research, the comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions and 3872
fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are featured. The definitions are followed by the examples 3873

and the instances thus the clarifications are driven with different tools. The applications are 3874
figured out to make sense about the theoretical aspect of this ongoing research. The “Cancer’s 3875
Recognition” are the under research to figure out the challenges make sense about ongoing and 3876
upcoming research. The special case is up. The cells are viewed in the deemed ways. There are 3877
different types of them. Some of them are individuals and some of them are well-modeled by 3878
the group of cells. These types are all officially called “SuperHyperVertex” but the relations 3879
amid them all officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. The frameworks “SuperHyperGraph” and 3880
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” are chosen and elected to research about “Cancer’s Recog- 3881
nition”. Thus these complex and dense SuperHyperModels open up some avenues to research 3882
on theoretical segments and “Cancer’s Recognition”. Some avenues are posed to pursue this 3883
research. It’s also officially collected in the form of some questions and some problems. As- 3884
sume a SuperHyperGraph. Assume a SuperHyperGraph. Then δ−SuperHyperDimension is a 3885
maximal of SuperHyperVertices with a maximum cardinality such that either of the follow- 3886
ing expressions hold for the (Neutrosophic) cardinalities of SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : 3887
there are |S ∩ N (s)| > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ; and |S ∩ N (s)| < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ. The 3888
first Expression, holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And the second Expression, holds 3889
if S is an δ−SuperHyperDefensive; a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperDimension is a maximal 3890
Neutrosophic of SuperHyperVertices with maximum Neutrosophic cardinality such that 3891
either of the following expressions hold for the Neutrosophic cardinalities of SuperHyper- 3892
Neighbors of s ∈ S there are: |S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ; 3893
if S is a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And the second Expression, holds if S is a 3895
Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperDefensive It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of a Super- 3896
HyperDimension . Since there’s more ways to get type-results to make a SuperHyperDimension 3897
more understandable. For the sake of having Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension, there’s a 3898
need to “redefine” the notion of a “SuperHyperDimension ”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 3899
there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. Assume a SuperHyperDimension 3901
. It’s redefined a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension if the mentioned Table holds, concerning, 3902
“The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges Belong to 3903
The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with the key points, “The Values of The Vertices & The 3904
maximum Values of Its Endpoints”. To get structural examples and instances, I’m going to 3908
introduce the next SuperHyperClass of SuperHyperGraph based on a SuperHyperDimension . It’s 3909

the main. It’ll be disciplinary to have the foundation of previous definition in the kind of Super- 3910
HyperClass. If there’s a need to have all SuperHyperDimension until the SuperHyperDimension, 3911
then it’s officially called a “SuperHyperDimension” but otherwise, it isn’t a SuperHyperDimension 3912
. There are some instances about the clarifications for the main definition titled a “SuperHyperDi- 3913
mension ”. These two examples get more scrutiny and discernment since there are characterized 3914
in the disciplinary ways of the SuperHyperClass based on a SuperHyperDimension . For the 3915
sake of having a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension, there’s a need to “redefine” the notion 3916
of a “Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension” and a “Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension ”. The 3917
SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the 3918
alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 3919

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s redefined “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” 3920

if the intended Table holds. And a SuperHyperDimension are redefined to a “Neutrosophic 3921
SuperHyperDimension” if the intended Table holds. It’s useful to define “Neutrosophic” version 3922
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension more understandable. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHy- 3924
perGraph. There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the intended Table holds. Thus 3925
SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperDimension, SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyper- 3926

MultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are “Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic 3927
SuperHyperDimension”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite”, 3928
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite”, and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel” if the intended 3929
Table holds. A SuperHyperGraph has a “Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension” where it’s the 3930
strongest [the maximum Neutrosophic value from all the SuperHyperDimension amid the max- 3931
imum value amid all SuperHyperVertices from a SuperHyperDimension .] SuperHyperDimension 3932

. A graph is a SuperHyperUniform if it’s a SuperHyperGraph and the number of elements of 3933
SuperHyperEdges are the same. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 3934
SuperHyperClasses as follows. It’s SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection 3935
amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; it’s SuperHyperDimension if it’s only 3936
one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperStar it’s 3937
only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s 3938
forming two separate sets, has no SuperHyperEdge in common; it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s 3940
be based on the “Cancer’s Recognition” and the results and the definitions will be introduced 3952
in redeemed ways. The recognition of the cancer in the long-term function. The specific region 3953
from the cancer is identified by this research. Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily 3955
identified since there are some determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and 3956
the effects of the cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said 3957
to be Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s happened and 3958
what’s done. There are some specific models, which are well-known and they’ve got the names, 3959
and some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The moves and the traces of the cancer on the 3960
complex tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a Neutrosophic 3961
SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperDimension, SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyper- 3962
Multipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to find either the longest SuperHyperDimension or 3963
the strongest SuperHyperDimension in those Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. For the longest 3964
SuperHyperDimension, called SuperHyperDimension, and the strongest SuperHyperDimension, 3965

called Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension, some general results are introduced. Beyond that 3966
in SuperHyperStar, all possible SuperHyperPaths have only two SuperHyperEdges but it’s 3967
not enough since it’s essential to have at least three SuperHyperEdges to form any style of a 3968
SuperHyperDimension. There isn’t any formation of any SuperHyperDimension but literarily, 3969
A basic familiarity with Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension theory, SuperHyperGraphs, and 3971
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs theory are proposed. 3972

Keywords: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, SuperHyperDimension, Cancer’s Neutrosophic 3973
Recognition 3974

CHAPTER 28 3976
Applied Notions Under The Scrutiny Of 3977
The Motivation Of This Scientific Research 3978
In this scientific research, there are some ideas in the featured frameworks of motivations. I try to 3979
bring the motivations in the narrative ways. Some cells have been faced with some attacks from the 3980
situation which is caused by the cancer’s attacks. In this case, there are some embedded analysis 3981
on the ongoing situations which in that, the cells could be labelled as some groups and some groups 3982
or individuals have excessive labels which all are raised from the behaviors to overcome the cancer’s 3983
attacks. In the embedded situations, the individuals of cells and the groups of cells could be 3984
considered as “new groups”. Thus it motivates us to find the proper SuperHyperModels for getting 3985
more proper analysis on this messy story. I’ve found the SuperHyperModels which are officially 3986
called “SuperHyperGraphs” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. In this SuperHyperModel, 3987
the cells and the groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” and the relations between 3988
called “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. The cancer is the disease but the model is going to 3996
figure out what’s going on this phenomenon. The special case of this disease is considered and 3997
disease but the moves of the cancer in the special region are the matter of mind. The recognition 3999
of the cancer could help to find some treatments for this disease. The SuperHyperGraph and 4000
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are the SuperHyperModels on the “Cancer’s Recognition” and 4001
both bases are the background of this research. Sometimes the cancer has been happened on the 4002
region, full of cells, groups of cells and embedded styles. In this segment, the SuperHyperModel 4003
proposes some SuperHyperNotions based on the connectivities of the moves of the cancer in the 4004
forms of alliances’ styles with the formation of the design and the architecture are formally called “ 4005
The recognition of the cancer in the long-term function. The specific region has been assigned 4008
by the model [it’s called SuperHyperGraph] and the long cycle of the move from the cancer is 4009
203
identified by this research. Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since 4010
there are some determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 4011
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be Neutrosophic 4012
SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s happened and what’s done. There 4013
are some specific models, which are well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general 4014
models. The moves and the traces of the cancer on the complex tracks and between complicated 4015
groups of cells could be fantasized by a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperDimension, 4016

SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is 4017
to find either the optimal SuperHyperDimension or the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in 4018
those Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. Some general results are introduced. Beyond that in 4019
SuperHyperStar, all possible Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath s have only two SuperHyperEdges 4020
but it’s not enough since it’s essential to have at least three SuperHyperEdges to form any style 4021
of a SuperHyperDimension. There isn’t any formation of any SuperHyperDimension but literarily, 4022
Thus it motivates us to define different types of “ SuperHyperDimension” and “Neutrosophic 4031
SuperHyperDimension” on “SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. Then the 4032
The framework of this research is as follows. In the beginning, I introduce basic definitions 4038
to clarify about preliminaries. In the subsection “Preliminaries”, initial definitions about 4039
SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are deeply-introduced and in-depth- 4040
discussed. The elementary concepts are clarified and illustrated completely and sometimes review 4041
literature are applied to make sense about what’s going to figure out about the upcoming 4042
sections. The main definitions and their clarifications alongside some results about new 4043
notions, SuperHyperDimension and Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension, are figured out in 4044
sections “ SuperHyperDimension” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension”. In the sense 4045
of tackling on getting results and in order to make sense about continuing the research, the 4046
ideas of SuperHyperUniform and Neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform are introduced and as their 4047
consequences, corresponded SuperHyperClasses are figured out to debut what’s done in this 4048
section, titled “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. 4049
As going back to origin of the notions, there are some smart steps toward the common 4050
notions to extend the new notions in new frameworks, SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 4051
SuperHyperGraph, in the sections “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic 4052
SuperHyperClasses”. The starter research about the general SuperHyperRelations and as 4053
concluding and closing section of theoretical research are contained in the section “General 4054

Results”. Some general SuperHyperRelations are fundamental and they are well-known as 4055
fundamental SuperHyperNotions as elicited and discussed in the sections, “General Results”, “ 4056
SuperHyperDimension”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension”, “Results on SuperHyperClasses” 4057
and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. There are curious questions about what’s 4058
done about the SuperHyperNotions to make sense about excellency of this research and going 4059
to figure out the word “best” as the description and adjective for this research as presented 4060
in section, “ SuperHyperDimension”. The keyword of this research debut in the section 4061
“Applications in Cancer’s Recognition” with two cases and subsections “Case 1: The Initial 4062
Steps Toward SuperHyperBipartite as SuperHyperModel” and “Case 2: The Increasing Steps 4063
Toward SuperHyperMultipartite as SuperHyperModel”. In the section, “Open Problems”, there 4064
are some scrutiny and discernment on what’s done and what’s happened in this research in the 4065
terms of “questions” and “problems” to make sense to figure out this research in featured style. 4066
The advantages and the limitations of this research alongside about what’s done in this research 4067
to make sense and to get sense about what’s figured out are included in the section, “Conclusion 4068
and Closing Remarks”. 4069

CHAPTER 29 4070
Neutrosophic Preliminaries Of This 4071
Scientific Research On the Redeemed 4072
Ways 4073
In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 4074
Neutrosophic Set](Ref.[HG38],Definition 2.2,p.2), [Neutrosophic Set](Ref.[HG38],Definition 4075

2.1,p.1), [Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref.[HG38],Definition 2.5,p.2), [Charac- 4076
terization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref.[HG38],Definition 2.7,p.3), [t- 4077
norm](Ref.[HG38], Definition 2.7, p.3), and [Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4078
Graph (NSHG)](Ref.[HG38],Definition 2.7,p.3), [Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic 4079
SuperHyperPaths] (Ref.[HG38],Definition 5.3,p.7), and [Different Neutrosophic Types of Neut- 4080
rosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] (Ref.[HG38],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new ideas and 4081
their clarifications are addressed to Ref.[HG38]. 4082
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this scientific research, is presented. Also, 4083
the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 4084
Definition 29.0.1 (Neutrosophic Set). (Ref.[HG38],Definition 2.1,p.1).

Let X be a space of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by x; then the
Neutrosophic set A (NS A) is an object having the form
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}
+
where the functions T, I, F : X →]− 0, 1 [ define respectively the a truth-membership
function, an indeterminacy-membership function, and a falsity-membership function
of the element x ∈ X to the set A with the condition
−
0 ≤ TA (x) + IA (x) + FA (x) ≤ 3+ .
+
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of ]− 0, 1 [. 4085
Definition 29.0.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref.[HG38],Definition 2.2,p.2).

Let X be a space of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by x. A single valued
Neutrosophic set A (SVNS A) is characterized by truth-membership function TA (x), an
indeterminacy-membership function IA (x), and a falsity-membership function FA (x). For each
point x in X, TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) ∈ [0, 1]. A SVNS A can be written as
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}.
207

falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x :
TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
TA (X) = min[TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = min[IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = min[FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
Definition 29.0.5 (Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). (Ref.[HG38],Definition 2.5,p.2). 4086

S = (V, E), where 4088
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 4093
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 4094
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 4095
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ); 4096
0
(ix) and the following conditions hold:
TV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
IV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,

and FV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0
where i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 . 4097



items. 4112
SuperEdge; 4118
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse types of 4121
general forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG). 4122
Definition 29.0.7 (t-norm). (Ref.[HG38], Definition 2.7, p.3). 4123

A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following for 4124
x, y, z, w ∈ [0, 1]: 4125
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 4126
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 4127
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 4128
(iv) If w ≤ x and y ≤ z then w ⊗ y ≤ x ⊗ z. 4129

falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x :
TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X} (with respect to t-norm Tnorm ):
TA (X) = Tnorm [TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = Tnorm [IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = Tnorm [FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
Definition 29.0.10. (General Forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 4130

S = (V, E), where 4132

(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 4137
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 4138
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 4139
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ). 4140
0

items. 4155
SuperEdge; 4161
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have some 4164
restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this SuperHyperGraph 4165
makes the patterns and regularities. 4166
Definition 29.0.12. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it’s SuperHyperGraph and the number 4167
of elements of SuperHyperEdges are the same. 4168

To get more visions on SuperHyperUniform, the some SuperHyperClasses are introduced. It 4169
makes to have SuperHyperUniform more understandable. 4170
Definition 29.0.13. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some SuperHyper- 4171
Classes as follows. 4172
(i). It’s Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 4173
two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; 4174
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given 4175
SuperHyperEdges; 4176
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all SuperHyperEdges; 4177
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given Supe- 4178
rHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has no SuperHyperEdge 4179
in common; 4180
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 4181
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, has no 4182
SuperHyperEdge in common; 4183
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given 4184
SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any common 4185
SuperVertex. 4186
Definition 29.0.14. Let an ordered pair S = (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph

(NSHG) S. Then a sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
is called a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 4187

(NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs if either of following conditions hold: 4188
(i) Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 4189
(ii) there’s a vertex vi ∈ Vi such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 4190
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 4191
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 4192
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ E i0 ; 4193
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 4194
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 4195
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 4196
(ix) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1

0
∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , Vi+1
0
∈ Ei0 . 4197

Definition 29.0.15. (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths).

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). a
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
could be characterized as follow-up items. 4198
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 4199
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 4200
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 4201
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4202
Path . 4203
Definition 29.0.16 (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths).

(Ref.[HG38],Definition 5.3,p.7).
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). A
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 4204
(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 4205
(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 4206
(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 4207
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 4208
Definition 29.0.17 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)). 4209

(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic t-strength of 4213

(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic i-strength of 4216


(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic f-strength of 4219

(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 4222
strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to 4223
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 4224
Definition 29.0.18. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension). 4225

(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension if ∀Ea , Eb ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ec ∈ E 0 , 4229

such that d(Ea , Ec ) 6= d(Eb , Ec ); 4230
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension if ∀Ea , Eb ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ec ∈ 4231

E 0 , such that d(Ea , Ec ) 6= d(Eb , Ec ); and |Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = 4232
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDimension if ∀Va , Vb ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vc ∈ V 0 , such 4234

that d(Va , Vc ) 6= d(Vb , Vc ); 4235
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension if ∀Va , Vb ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vc ∈ 4236

V 0 , such that d(Va , Vc ) 6= d(Vb , Vc ); and |Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = 4237
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension,

4239
rosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension. 4241
Definition 29.0.19. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDimension). 4242

(i) an Extreme SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension,4245

(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic e- 4252


(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neut- 4259


(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 4268


SuperHyperDimension; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic 4276
coefficient; 4277
(v) an Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension,4278

(vi) a Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic e- 4285

(vii) an Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neut- 4292

(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 4301


Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 4309

Definition 29.0.20. ((Extreme/Neutrosophic)δ−SuperHyperDimension). 4311

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). Then 4312
(i) an δ−SuperHyperDimension is a Neutrosophic kind of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDi- 4313

mension such that either of the following expressions hold for the Neutrosophic cardinalities 4314
of SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : 4315
|S ∩ N (s)| > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ; 136EQN1
|S ∩ N (s)| < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ. 136EQN2
The Expression (29.1), holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And the Expression 4316

(29.1), holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperDefensive; 4317
(ii) a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperDimension is a Neutrosophic kind of Neutrosophic 4318

SuperHyperDimension such that either of the following Neutrosophic expressions hold for 4319
the Neutrosophic cardinalities of SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : 4320
|S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ; 136EQN3
|S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ. 136EQN4
The Expression (29.1), holds if S is a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And 4321

the Expression (29.1), holds if S is a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperDefensive. 4322
notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. The SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges 4324

are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the usage 4325
of the position of labels to assign to the values. 4326
S = (V, E). It’s redefined Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (29.1) holds. 4328
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s more ways 4329
to get Neutrosophic type-results to make a Neutrosophic more understandable. 4330
S = (V, E). There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (29.2) holds. Thus 4332
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath , SuperHyperDimension, SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipart- 4333
ite, SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath, 4334
Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar, Neutrosophic Su- 4335
perHyperBipartite, Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite, and Neutrosophic Supe- 4336
rHyperWheel if the Table (29.2) holds. 4337


136TBL3
Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition (29.0.22)

136TBL4

136TBL1
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension. Since 4338

there’s more ways to get type-results to make a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension more 4339
Neutrosophicly understandable. 4340
Neutrosophic notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 4342

there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 4344
136DEF1 Definition 29.0.23. Assume a SuperHyperDimension. It’s redefined a Neutrosophic Super- 4345
HyperDimension if the Table (29.3) holds. 4346

CHAPTER 30 4347
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension But 4348
As The Extensions Excerpt From Dense 4349
And Super Forms 4350
136EXM1 Example 30.0.1. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair 4351
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 4352
• On the Figure (30.1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 4353
HyperDimension, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 4354
E1 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop Neutrosophic 4355
SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutro- 4356
sophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . 4357
The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no 4358
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus the Neutrosophic 4359
SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension. 4360
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {Ei }3i=1 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi }3i=1 .
4361
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a Neutrosophic 4364
SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only 4365
one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 4366
is Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a 4367
Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every 4368
217
Figure 30.1: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (42.0.3) 136NSHG1
given Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension. 4369

4370
• On the Figure (30.3), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic SuperHy- 4371
perDimension, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 4372

4373

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi }Vi 6=V3 ,V4 ,O .





4376
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {Ei }i6=1 .

= 5 × 4 + 4 × 3 + 4 × 5 × 4z 13 .
4379

= 2 × 8z 21 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Quasi-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
= 2 × 820 .
4382





C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {Ei }i6=13,15,16 .

= 3 × 2 × 1z 13 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi }i6=6,12,13 .
= (3 × 2 × 4) + (2 × 4 × 2 × 3) + z 11 .
4385

= 3 × 1 × 2z 2 .
= (3 × 2 × 4) + (2 × 4 × 2 × 3) + z 11 .
4388



= 2 × 8z 21 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Quasi-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
= 2 × 820 .
4391

= 3 × 1 × 2z 2 .
= (3 × 2 × 4) + (2 × 4 × 2 × 3) + z 11 .





4394

= 3 × 2z 4 .
4397

C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial =
= 4z 8 .
4400



= 3 × 2z 4 .
4403

C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension = {V2 }.
4406
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension = {E1 }



C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension = {V5 , Vi }i6=2,4 .
4409

4412



4415

C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension = {V27 , Vi }i6=1,2,6,10,17,22 .
4418
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {E1 , E2 }.









4421

= {Vi }Vi 6=V1 ,{H13 } .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = sz.
4424


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z.
4427

= {V1 , Vi }i6=2,10,6,5 .
= 5 × 1z n−4 .
4430


Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (42.0.3) 95NHG1


Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (42.0.3) 95NHG2

CHAPTER 31 4431
The Neutrosophic Departures on The 4432
Theoretical Results Toward Theoretical 4433
Motivations 4434
The previous Neutrosophic approach apply on the upcoming Neutrosophic results on Neutrosophic 4435
SuperHyperClasses. 4436
Proposition 31.0.1. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). Then 4437
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {E1 }

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension
= {V1 , V EXT ERN AL , V IN T ERN AL }Vi 6=nV EXT ERN AL
n−{V1 ,V EXT ERN AL ,V IN T ERN AL }V EXT ERN AL
= nz i 6=nV
Proof. Let 4438
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...
be a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). There’s 4439

235
Figure 31.1: a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of Neutrosophic

136EXM18a Example 31.0.2. In the Figure (31.1), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : 4443
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic 4444
SuperHyperModel (31.1), is the SuperHyperDimension. 4445
There are two notions on SuperHyperDimension in SuperHyperCycle. Twin and antipodal. 4446
The first is about having the same SuperHyperNeighborhoods and the latter is having the same 4447
SuperHyperDistance but both could not be out of the any given SuperHyperDimension easily. 4448
All Twin SuperHyperVertices could not be out of the any given SuperHyperDimension and one 4449
of them could be out but the latter have to be inside. All Antipodal SuperHyperVertices could 4450
not be out of the any given SuperHyperDimension and one of them could be out but the latter 4451
have to be inside. and one of them could be out but the latter have to be inside. The proof for 4452
both of the is straightforward. 4453
Proposition 31.0.3. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). Then 4454
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {E1 , E2 }

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = nz 2
= {V1 , V2 , V EXT ERN AL , V IN T ERN AL }Vi 6=nV EXT ERN AL
n−{V1 ,V2 ,V EXT ERN AL ,V IN T ERN AL }V EXT ERN AL
= nz i 6=nV

Figure 31.2: a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (42.0.7) 136NSHG19a
Proof. Let 4455
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...
be a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). There’s 4456

136EXM19a Example 31.0.4. In the Figure (31.2), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle N SHC : 4460
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 4461
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (31.2), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension. 4462

Proposition 31.0.5. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). Then 4463
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension

.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }Vi 6=V1 ,V2 .
Proof. Let 4464
be a longest path taken a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). There’s a 4465

136EXM20a Example 31.0.6. In the Figure (31.3), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : 4469
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm 4470
in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 4471
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (31.3), is 4472
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension. 4473
Proposition 31.0.7. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 4474
Then 4475

i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

Figure 31.3: a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (42.0.9) 136NSHG20a
X X
EXT ERN AL |
Neutrosophic Cardinality
Proof. Let 4476
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 4477


P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperDimension taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 4485

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
136EXM21a Example 31.0.8. In the Neutrosophic Figure (31.4), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBi- 4489
partite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. The obtained 4490
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, 4491
of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 4492
ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (31.4), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4493
Dimension. 4494
Proposition 31.0.9. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). 4495
Then 4496

i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 4497
P :

Figure 31.4: Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutrosophic

Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Example (42.0.11) 136NSHG21a
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperDimension taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 4498


P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : 4506

Figure 31.5: a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutrosophic

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). 4509
136EXM22a Example 31.0.10. In the Figure (31.5), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 4511
ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 4512
SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 4513
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in 4514
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (31.5), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension. 4515
Proposition 31.0.11. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). 4516
Then, 4517

.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }Vi 6=V1 ,V2 .

Figure 31.6: a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutrosophic

Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (42.0.15) 136NSHG23a
Proof. Let 4518
is a longest SuperHyperDimension taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 4519

ESHW : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 4520

to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperDimension. The latter is straightforward. 4522
Then there’s at least one SuperHyperDimension. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and 4523
the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperDimension could be applied. The unique 4524
embedded SuperHyperDimension proposes some longest SuperHyperDimension excerpt from 4525
136EXM23a Example 31.0.12. In the Neutrosophic Figure (31.6), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4527
Wheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 4528
SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of 4529
the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHy- 4530
perModel (31.6), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension. 4531

CHAPTER 32 4532
The Surveys of Mathematical Sets On The 4533
Results But As The Initial Motivation 4534
For the SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension, and the Neutrosophic 4535

SuperHyperDimension, some general results are introduced. 4536
Remark 32.0.1. Let remind that the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension is “redefined” on the 4537
positions of the alphabets. 4538
Corollary 32.0.2. Assume Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension. Then 4539
N eutrosophic SuperHyperDimension =
{theSuperHyperDimensionof theSuperHyperV ertices |
max |SuperHyperOf f ensive
SuperHyperDimension
|N eutrosophiccardinalityamidthoseSuperHyperDimension. }
plus one Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbor to one. Where σi is the unary operation on the 4540
SuperHyperVertices of the SuperHyperGraph to assign the determinacy, the indeterminacy and 4541
the neutrality, for i = 1, 2, 3, respectively. 4542
Corollary 32.0.3. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph on the same identical letter of the 4543
alphabet. Then the notion of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension and SuperHyperDimension 4544
coincide. 4545
Corollary 32.0.4. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph on the same identical letter of 4546
the alphabet. Then a consecutive sequence of the SuperHyperVertices is a Neutrosophic 4547
SuperHyperDimension if and only if it’s a SuperHyperDimension. 4548
Corollary 32.0.5. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph on the same identical letter 4549
of the alphabet. Then a consecutive sequence of the SuperHyperVertices is a strongest 4550
SuperHyperDimension if and only if it’s a longest SuperHyperDimension. 4551
Corollary 32.0.6. Assume SuperHyperClasses of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph on the 4552
same identical letter of the alphabet. Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension is its 4553
SuperHyperDimension and reversely. 4554
245
Corollary 32.0.7. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperDimension, SuperHy- 4555

perStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel) on the same identical 4556
letter of the alphabet. Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension is its SuperHyperDimension 4557
and reversely. 4558
Corollary 32.0.8. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4559
Dimension isn’t well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperDimension isn’t well-defined. 4560
Corollary 32.0.9. Assume SuperHyperClasses of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then its 4561

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension isn’t well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperDimension 4562
isn’t well-defined. 4563

perStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). Then its Neutrosophic 4565
SuperHyperDimension isn’t well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperDimension isn’t well-defined. 4566
Corollary 32.0.11. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then its Neutrosophic SuperHy- 4567
perDimension is well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperDimension is well-defined. 4568
Corollary 32.0.12. Assume SuperHyperClasses of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then its 4569

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension is well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperDimension is 4570
well-defined. 4571

perStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). Then its Neutrosophic 4573
SuperHyperDimension is well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperDimension is well-defined. 4574
Proposition 32.0.14. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then V is 4575
(i) : the dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 4576
(ii) : the strong dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 4577
(iii) : the connected dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 4578
(iv) : the δ-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 4579
(v) : the strong δ-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 4580
(vi) : the connected δ-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 4581
Proposition 32.0.15. Let N T G : (V, E, σ, µ) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then ∅ is 4582
(iii) : the connected defensive SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 4585

Proposition 32.0.16. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then an 4589

independent SuperHyperSet is 4590
(iii) : the connected SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 4593
Proposition 32.0.17. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform SuperHyper- 4597
Graph which is a SuperHyperDimension/SuperHyperPath. Then V is a maximal 4598
(iv) : O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 4602
(v) : strong O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 4603
(vi) : connected O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 4604
Proposition 32.0.18. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is a 4606
SuperHyperUniform SuperHyperWheel. Then V is a maximal 4607
(iv) : O(ESHG)-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 4611
(v) : strong O(ESHG)-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 4612
(vi) : connected O(ESHG)-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 4613
Graph which is a SuperHyperDimension/SuperHyperPath. Then the number of 4616
(i) : the SuperHyperDimension; 4617
(ii) : the SuperHyperDimension; 4618

(iii) : the connected SuperHyperDimension; 4619
(iv) : the O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDimension; 4620
(v) : the strong O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDimension; 4621
(vi) : the connected O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDimension. 4622
coincide. 4624

Graph which is a SuperHyperWheel. Then the number of 4626
(i) : the dual SuperHyperDimension; 4627
(ii) : the dual SuperHyperDimension; 4628
(iii) : the dual connected SuperHyperDimension; 4629
(iv) : the dual O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDimension; 4630
(v) : the strong dual O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDimension; 4631
(vi) : the connected dual O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDimension. 4632
coincide. 4634

Graph which is a SuperHyperStar/SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperBipartite/SuperHyperComplete 4636
SuperHyperMultipartite. Then a SuperHyperSet contains [the SuperHyperCenter and] the half of 4637
multiplying r with the number of all the SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the SuperHyperVertices 4638
is a 4639
O(ESHG)
O(ESHG)
O(ESHG)

SuperHyperMultipartite. Then a SuperHyperSet contains the half of multiplying r with the number 4648
of all the SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the SuperHyperVertices in the biggest SuperHyperPart 4649
is a 4650

(iv) : δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 4654
(v) : strong δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 4655
(vi) : connected δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 4656

SuperHyperMultipartite. Then Then the number of 4659
O(ESHG)
O(ESHG)
O(ESHG)
is one and it’s only S, a SuperHyperSet contains [the SuperHyperCenter and] the half of multiplying 4666
r with the number of all the SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the SuperHyperVertices. Where the 4667
exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices coincide. 4668
Proposition 32.0.24. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. The number of 4669
connected component is |V − S| if there’s a SuperHyperSet which is a dual 4670
(iv) : SuperHyperDimension; 4674
Proposition 32.0.25. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then the number 4677
is at most O(ESHG) and the Neutrosophic number is at most On (ESHG). 4678
Proposition 32.0.26. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is 4679
SuperHyperComplete. The number is O(ESHG:(V,E)) 2 + 1 and the Neutrosophic number is 4680

min Σv∈{v1 ,v2 ,··· ,vt } O(ESHG:(V,E)) ⊆V σ(v), in the setting of dual 4681
t>
2



Proposition 32.0.27. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is ∅. The 4688
number is 0 and the Neutrosophic number is 0, for an independent SuperHyperSet in the setting 4689
of dual 4690
(iv) : 0-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 4694

SuperHyperComplete. Then there’s no independent SuperHyperSet. 4698

SuperHyperDimension/SuperHyperPath/SuperHyperWheel. The number is O(ESHG : (V, E)) 4700
and the Neutrosophic number is On (ESHG : (V, E)), in the setting of a dual 4701
(iv) : O(ESHG : (V, E))-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 4705
(v) : strong O(ESHG : (V, E))-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 4706
(vi) : connected O(ESHG : (V, E))-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 4707

SuperHyperStar/complete SuperHyperBipartite/complete SuperHyperMultiPartite. The number is 4709
O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1 and the Neutrosophic number is min Σv∈{v1 ,v2 ,··· ,vt } O(ESHG:(V,E)) ⊆V σ(v), in 4710
t>
2
the setting of a dual 4711



Proposition 32.0.31. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a SuperHyperFamily of the ESHGs : (V, E) 4718
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs which are from one-type SuperHyperClass which the result is 4719
obtained for the individuals. Then the results also hold for the SuperHyperFamily N SHF : (V, E) 4720
of these specific SuperHyperClasses of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs. 4721
Proposition 32.0.32. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If S is a 4722

dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension, then ∀v ∈ V \ S, ∃x ∈ S such that 4723
(i) v ∈ Ns (x); 4724
(ii) vx ∈ E. 4725
Proposition 32.0.33. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If S is a 4726

dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension, then 4727
(i) S is SuperHyperDimension set; 4728
(ii) there’s S ⊆ S 0 such that |S 0 | is SuperHyperChromatic number. 4729
Proposition 32.0.34. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then 4730
(i) Γ ≤ O; 4731
(ii) Γs ≤ On . 4732
Proposition 32.0.35. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is 4733
connected. Then 4734
(i) Γ ≤ O − 1; 4735
(ii) Γs ≤ On − Σ3i=1 σi (x). 4736
Proposition 32.0.36. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an odd SuperHyperPath. Then 4737

mension; 4739
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· ,vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 4741
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 } are only a dual 4742

Proposition 32.0.37. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an even SuperHyperPath. Then 4744
(i) the set S = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 4745
(ii) Γ = b n2 c and corresponded SuperHyperSets are {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } and {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 }; 4746
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 4747
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 } are only dual 4748
Proposition 32.0.38. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an even SuperHyperDimension. Then 4750
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimen- 4751

sion; 4752
(ii) Γ = b n2 c and corresponded SuperHyperSets are {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } and {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 }; 4753
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn } σ(s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· ,vn−1 } σ(s)}; 4754
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 } are only dual 4755
Proposition 32.0.39. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an odd SuperHyperDimension. Then 4757

mension; 4759
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 4761
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn−1 } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 } are only dual 4762
Proposition 32.0.40. Let ESHG : (V, E) be SuperHyperStar. Then 4764
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {c} is a dual maximal SuperHyperDimension; 4765
(ii) Γ = 1; 4766
(iii) Γs = Σ3i=1 σi (c); 4767
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {c} and S ⊂ S 0 are only dual SuperHyperDimension. 4768
Proposition 32.0.41. Let ESHG : (V, E) be SuperHyperWheel. Then 4769
6+3(i−1)≤n
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 is a dual maximal 4770
SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 4771
6+3(i−1)≤n
(ii) Γ = |{v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 |; 4772
(iii) Γs = Σ{v1 ,v3 }∪{v6 ,v9 ··· ,vi+6 ,··· ,vn }6+3(i−1)≤n Σ3i=1 σi (s); 4773
i=1

6+3(i−1)≤n
(iv) the SuperHyperSet {v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 is only a dual maximal 4774
SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 4775
Proposition 32.0.42. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an odd SuperHyperComplete. Then 4776
bn
2 c+1
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1; 4778

2
; 4779
S={vi }i=1
b n c+1
2
is only a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimen- 4780
sion. 4781
Proposition 32.0.43. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an even SuperHyperComplete. Then 4782
bn
2c
(ii) Γ = b n2 c; 4784

2
; 4785
S={vi }i=1
bnc
2
is only a dual maximal SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyper- 4786
Dimension. 4787
Proposition 32.0.44. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a m-SuperHyperFamily of Neutrosophic SuperHy- 4788

perStars with common Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex SuperHyperSet. Then 4789
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {c1 , c2 , · · · , cm } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimen- 4790

sion for N SHF; 4791
(ii) Γ = m for N SHF : (V, E); 4792
(iii) Γs = Σm 3
i=1 Σj=1 σj (ci ) for N SHF : (V, E); 4793
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {c1 , c2 , · · · , cm } and S ⊂ S 0 are only dual SuperHyperDimension 4794
for N SHF : (V, E). 4795
Proposition 32.0.45. Let N SHF : (V, E) be an m-SuperHyperFamily of odd SuperHyperComplete 4796

SuperHyperGraphs with common Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex SuperHyperSet. Then 4797
b n c+1
2
is a dual maximal SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDi- 4798
mension for N SHF; 4799
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1 for N SHF : (V, E); 4800

2
for N SHF : (V, E); 4801
S={vi }i=1
b n c+1
2
are only a dual maximal SuperHyperDimension for 4802
N SHF : (V, E). 4803

Proposition 32.0.46. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a m-SuperHyperFamily of even SuperHyperComplete 4804

SuperHyperGraphs with common Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex SuperHyperSet. Then 4805
bn
2c
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension for 4806
N SHF : (V, E); 4807
(ii) Γ = b n2 c for N SHF : (V, E); 4808
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S Σ3i=1 σi (s)} 2

bnc for N SHF : (V, E); 4809
S={vi }i=1
bnc
2
are only dual maximal SuperHyperDimension for 4810
N SHF : (V, E). 4811
following statements hold; 4813
(i) if s ≥ t and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is an t-SuperHyperDefensive 4814
SuperHyperDimension, then S is an s-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension; 4815

SuperHyperDimension, then S is a dual s-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDimension. 4817
following statements hold; 4819
(i) if s ≥ t + 2 and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is an t-SuperHyperDefensive 4820

SuperHyperDimension, then S is an s-SuperHyperPowerful SuperHyperDimension; 4821

SuperHyperDimension, then S is a dual s-SuperHyperPowerful SuperHyperDimension. 4823
Proposition 32.0.49. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a[an] [V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic 4824

(i) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| b 2r c + 1, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 2-SuperHyperDefensive 4828
(iii) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is an V-SuperHyperDefensive 4830

(iv) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual V-SuperHyperDefensive 4832

Proposition 32.0.50. Let ESHG : (V, E) is a[an] [V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic 4834

(i) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| b 2r c + 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 2-SuperHyperDefensive 4838

(iii) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is an V-SuperHyperDefensive 4840

(iv) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual V-SuperHyperDefensive 4842


(i) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| b O−1

2 c + 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 2-SuperHyperDefensive 4848
(iii) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is an (O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive 4850

(iv) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual (O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive 4852

(i) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| b O−1

2 c+1, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 2-SuperHyperDefensive 4858
(iii) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is (O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive 4860

(iv) if ∀a ∈ V \S, |Ns (a)∩V \S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual (O−1)-SuperHyperDefensive 4862

(i) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < 2 if ESHG : (V, E)) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDi- 4866
mension; 4867
(ii) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > 2 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 2-SuperHyperDefensive 4868

(iii) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 4870

(iv) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 2-SuperHyperDefensive 4872


(i) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < 2, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 4876
(ii) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > 2, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 2-SuperHyperDefensive 4878
(iii) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 4880

(iv) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 2-SuperHyperDefensive 4882


CHAPTER 33 4884
Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 4885
Neutrosophic Recognition 4886
The cancer is the Neutrosophic disease but the Neutrosophic model is going to figure out what’s 4887
going on this Neutrosophic phenomenon. The special Neutrosophic case of this Neutrosophic 4888
disease is considered and as the consequences of the model, some parameters are used. The 4889
cells are under attack of this disease but the moves of the cancer in the special region are the 4890
matter of mind. The Neutrosophic recognition of the cancer could help to find some Neutrosophic 4891
treatments for this Neutrosophic disease. 4892
In the following, some Neutrosophic steps are Neutrosophic devised on this disease. 4893
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) The Neutrosophic recognition of the cancer in the long-term 4894
Neutrosophic function. 4895
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the Neutrosophic model 4896
[it’s called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] and the long Neutrosophic cycle of the move 4897
easily identified since there are some determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the 4899
moves and the effects of the cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another 4900
model [it’s said to be Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on 4901
what’s happened and what’s done. 4902
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models, which are well- 4903
known and they’ve got the names, and some general Neutrosophic models. The moves and 4904
the Neutrosophic traces of the cancer on the complex tracks and between complicated groups 4905
of cells could be fantasized by a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperDimension, 4906
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The 4907
aim is to find either the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension or the Neutrosophic 4908

SuperHyperDimension in those Neutrosophic Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. 4909
257
CHAPTER 34 4910
Case 1: The Initial Neutrosophic Steps 4911
Toward Neutrosophic 4912
SuperHyperBipartite as Neutrosophic 4913
SuperHyperModel 4914
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (34.1), the Neutrosophic Super- 4915
HyperBipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. 4916
Figure 34.1: a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutrosophic

259
Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite

136TBLaa21aa
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (34.1) and the Table (34.1), the Neutrosophic SuperHy- 4917
perBipartite is obtained. 4918
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in previous 4919
Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic 4920
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (34.1), is the 4921
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension. 4922

CHAPTER 35 4923
Case 2: The Increasing Neutrosophic 4924
Steps Toward Neutrosophic 4925
SuperHyperMultipartite as 4926
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 4927
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (35.1), the Neutrosophic Super- 4928
HyperMultipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. 4929
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (35.1) and the Table (35.1), the Neutrosophic SuperHy- 4930
perMultipartite is obtained. 4931
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in previous 4932
Figure 35.1: a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutrosophic

261
Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite

136TBLaa22aa
result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHy- 4933

perMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (35.1), is the 4934
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension. 4935

CHAPTER 36 4936
Wondering Open Problems But As The 4937
Directions To Forming The Motivations 4938
In what follows, some “problems” and some “questions” are proposed. 4939
The SuperHyperDimension and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension are defined on a real- 4940
world application, titled “Cancer’s Recognitions”. 4941
Question 36.0.1. Which the else SuperHyperModels could be defined based on Cancer’s 4942
recognitions? 4943
Question 36.0.2. Are there some SuperHyperNotions related to SuperHyperDimension and the 4944
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension? 4945
Question 36.0.3. Are there some Algorithms to be defined on the SuperHyperModels to compute 4946
them? 4947
Question 36.0.4. Which the SuperHyperNotions are related to beyond the SuperHyperDimension 4948
and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension? 4949
Problem 36.0.5. The SuperHyperDimension and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension do a 4950

SuperHyperModel for the Cancer’s recognitions and they’re based on SuperHyperDimension, are 4951
there else? 4952
Problem 36.0.6. Which the fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are related to these SuperHyper- 4953
Numbers types-results? 4954
Problem 36.0.7. What’s the independent research based on Cancer’s recognitions concerning the 4955
multiple types of SuperHyperNotions? 4956
263
CHAPTER 37 4957
Conclusion and Closing Remarks 4958
In this section, concluding remarks and closing remarks are represented. The drawbacks of this 4959
research are illustrated. Some benefits and some advantages of this research are highlighted. 4960
This research uses some approaches to make Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs more understand- 4961
able. In this endeavor, two SuperHyperNotions are defined on the SuperHyperDimension. For 4962
that sake in the second definition, the main definition of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 4963
is redefined on the position of the alphabets. Based on the new definition for the Neutrosophic 4964
SuperHyperGraph, the new SuperHyperNotion, Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension, finds the 4965
convenient background to implement some results based on that. Some SuperHyperClasses and 4966
some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses are the cases of this research on the modeling of the 4967
regions where are under the attacks of the cancer to recognize this disease as it’s mentioned on 4968
the title “Cancer’s Recognitions”. To formalize the instances on the SuperHyperNotion, Super- 4969
HyperDimension, the new SuperHyperClasses and SuperHyperClasses, are introduced. Some 4970
general results are gathered in the section on the SuperHyperDimension and the Neutrosophic 4971
SuperHyperDimension. The clarifications, instances and literature reviews have taken the whole 4972
way through. In this research, the literature reviews have fulfilled the lines containing the 4973
notions and the results. The SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are the 4974
SuperHyperModels on the “Cancer’s Recognitions” and both bases are the background of this 4975
based on the connectivities of the moves of the cancer in the longest and strongest styles with 4978
embedded styles to figure out the background for the SuperHyperNotions. In the Table (37.1), 4981
benefits and avenues for this research are, figured out, pointed out and spoken out. 4982
265
Table 37.1: An Overlook On This Research And Beyond 136TBLTBL
Advantages Limitations
1. Redefining Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1. General Results
2. SuperHyperDimension
3. Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension 2. Other SuperHyperNumbers
4. Modeling of Cancer’s Recognitions
5. SuperHyperClasses 3. SuperHyperFamilies

CHAPTER 38 4983
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality But As 4984
Super Forms 4986
Definition 38.0.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality). 4987
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Ei ∈ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 such that 4991

Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 4992
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Ei ∈ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 such that 4993

Va ∈ Ei , Ej and |Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 4994
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Vi ∈ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 such that 4995

Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 4996
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Vi ∈ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 such that 4997

Vi , Vj ∈ Ea and |Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 4998
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDuality, 4999

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDuality, and Neutrosophic 5000
rv-SuperHyperDuality. 5001
Definition 38.0.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDuality). 5002
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDuality, 5005

rv-SuperHyperDuality and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 5007
cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of 5009
Extreme SuperHyperDuality; 5011
267
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDuality, 5012

rv-SuperHyperDuality and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : 5014
(V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 5015
of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive 5016
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they 5017
form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality; 5018
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neut- 5019
rosophic e-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic v- 5020

SuperHyperDuality, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 5021
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the 5022
Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of 5023
the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality 5024
consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they 5025
form the Extreme SuperHyperDuality; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 5026
Extreme coefficient; 5027
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neut- 5028

SuperHyperDuality, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality and C(N SHG) for a Neut- 5030
rosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial 5031
contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the maximum 5032
Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHy- 5033
perSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and 5034
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality; 5035
and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient; 5036
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDuality, 5037

rv-SuperHyperDuality and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 5039
Extreme SuperHyperDuality; 5043
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic e- 5044

SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDuality, 5045
and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 5046
Graph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 5047
SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality 5048
consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such 5049
that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality; 5050
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neut- 5051

SuperHyperDuality, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 5053

Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality 5055
of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme 5056
cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such 5057
that they form the Extreme SuperHyperDuality; and the Extreme power is corresponded 5058
to its Extreme coefficient; 5059
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neut- 5060

SuperHyperDuality, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality and C(N SHG) for a Neut- 5062
Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic Super- 5065
HyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 5066

and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 5067
Duality; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient. 5068
• On the Figure (30.1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 5071

SuperHyperDuality, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 5072
E1 and E3 are some empty Extreme SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop Neutrosophic 5073
SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of 5074
Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, 5075

E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no 5076
SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality. 5078
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.

given Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality. 5086





C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E3i+13i=0 , E3i+243i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial 6z 8 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V3i+17i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E15 , E16 , E17 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V3 , V13 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 5 × 5z 3 .


4 × 5 × 5z 3 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E3i+13i=0 , E23 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V3i+13i=0 , V15 }.


4 × 5 × 5z 3 .


3 × 3z 2 .


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V1 , Vii610=5,7,8 }.
i=4



3 × 3z 2 .






(2 × 1 × 2) + (2 × 4 × 5)z.


(1 × 1 × 2)z.



(2 × 2 × 2)z.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E3i+1i=03 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V2i+1i=05 }.





C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
= 10 × 9 + 10 × 6 + 12 × 9 + 12 × 6z 2 .
The previous Neutrosophic approach apply on the upcoming Neutrosophic results on 5127
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. 5128

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality =

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality

.
Y |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z 3 .
Proof. Let 5130
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
3 3

SuperHyperModel (31.1), is the SuperHyperDuality. 5137
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality =

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality


.
Proof. Let 5139
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (31.2), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality. 5146
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 5148



the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality. 5157
Then 5159
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality

i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 5160
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL

based on SuperHyperDuality could be applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every 5166
P :

V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperDuality taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 5168

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Bipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. The obtained 5173
Duality. 5177
Then 5179

i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
EXT ERN AL |

Proof. Let 5180
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperDuality taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 5181


based on SuperHyperDuality could be applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every 5186
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (31.5), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality. 5197

Then, 5199
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality = {E ∗ ∈ EESHG:(V,E)

∗
}.
= |i | Ei∗ ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|
∗
|z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 5200
P :
...,
∗ EXT ERN AL
E|E ∗ | , V|E ∗ |Neutrosophic Cardinality +1
ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality ESHG:(V,E)
is a longest SuperHyperDuality taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 5201


∗
, ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez∗ ≡
∗
, {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez∗ .
based on SuperHyperDuality could be applied. The unique embedded SuperHyperDuality 5206

proposes some longest SuperHyperDuality excerpt from some representatives. The latter is 5207
perModel (31.6), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality. 5213

CHAPTER 39 5214
Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin But As The 5215
Super Forms 5217
Definition 39.0.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin). 5218
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , such that 5222

Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; and ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; 5223
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , such that 5224

Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; and |Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = 5225
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such that 5227

Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; and ∀Vi , Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; 5228
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such that 5229

(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin, 5232

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperJoin, and Neutrosophic rv- 5233
SuperHyperJoin. 5234
Definition 39.0.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperJoin). 5235

(i) an Extreme SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin, Neut- 5238

rosophic re-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperJoin, and Neutrosophic rv- 5239
the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme car- 5241
dinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 5242
281
SuperHyperJoin; 5244
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin, 5245
Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperJoin, and Neutrosophic 5246

rv-SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : 5247
form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin; 5251
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic 5252

e-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperJoin, 5253
and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 5254
SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive 5257
Extreme SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; 5259
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 5260

Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic v- 5261
SuperHyperJoin, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic 5262
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial contains the 5263

Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic 5264
cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of 5265
high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutro- 5266
sophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin; and the 5267
Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient; 5268
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin, 5269

SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the 5271
maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality 5272

of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 5273
SuperHyperJoin; 5275
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin, 5276

SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 5278
is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 5279

form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin; 5282
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic 5283
e-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperJoin, 5284

and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 5285
SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive 5288
Extreme SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; 5290
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 5291

Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic v- 5292
SuperHyperJoin, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic 5293
cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S 5296
of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutro- 5297

sophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin; and the 5298
Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient. 5299

SuperHyperJoin, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 5303
SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin. 5309
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.


given Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin. 5317





C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E3i+13i=0 , E3i+243i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial 6z 8 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V3i+17i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E15 , E16 , E17 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V3 , V13 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 5 × 5z 3 .


4 × 5 × 5z 3 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E3i+13i=0 , E23 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V3i+13i=0 , V15 }.


4 × 5 × 5z 3 .


3 × 3z 2 .


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V1 , Vii610=5,7,8 }.
i=4



3 × 3z 2 .






(1 × 5 × 5) + (1 × 2 + 1)z 3 .


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .



C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E3i+1i=03 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V2i+1i=05 }.





C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
= 10 × 6 + 10 × 6 + 12 × 6 + 12 × 6z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin =

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin

.
Proof. Let 5361
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

SuperHyperModel (31.1), is the SuperHyperJoin. 5368

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
= 3z 3 .


.
Proof. Let 5370
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (31.2), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin. 5377
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperJoin = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperJoin = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 5379



the Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin. 5388
Then 5390
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperJoin

i
= (OTHERWISE).
{},
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
= (OTHERWISE)0.
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 5391
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL


based on SuperHyperJoin could be applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every 5397
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperJoin taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : 5399

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Join. 5408

Then 5410

i
= (OTHERWISE).
{},
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
= (OTHERWISE)0.
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 5411
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperJoin taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 5412



based on SuperHyperJoin could be applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every 5417
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (31.5), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin. 5428
Then, 5430

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
= 3z 3 .

.

Proof. Let 5431
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3
is a longest SuperHyperJoin taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel ESHW : 5432


ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperJoin. The latter is straightforward. Then there’s at 5435
least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based 5436
on SuperHyperJoin could be applied. The unique embedded SuperHyperJoin proposes some 5437
longest SuperHyperJoin excerpt from some representatives. The latter is straightforward. 5438
perModel (31.6), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin. 5443

CHAPTER 40 5444
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect But As 5445
Super Forms 5447
Definition 40.0.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect). 5448
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , such that 5452

Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 5453
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , such that 5454

(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , such that 5456

Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 5457
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , such that 5458

(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperPerfect, 5460

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperPerfect, and Neutrosophic 5461
rv-SuperHyperPerfect. 5462
Definition 40.0.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperPerfect). 5463
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperPerfect, 5466

rv-SuperHyperPerfect and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 5468
Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; 5472
295
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperPerfect, 5473

rv-SuperHyperPerfect and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : 5475
form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect; 5479
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neut- 5480
rosophic e-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic v- 5481

SuperHyperPerfect, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperPerfect and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 5482
of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardin- 5485
ality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that 5486
they form the Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 5487
Extreme coefficient; 5488
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neut- 5489

SuperHyperPerfect, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperPerfect and C(N SHG) for a Neut- 5491
Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHy- 5494
perSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and 5495
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect; 5496
and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient; 5497
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperPerfect, 5498

rv-SuperHyperPerfect and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 5500
Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; 5504
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperPerfect,5505

rv-SuperHyperPerfect and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 5507
is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a 5508
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutro- 5509
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect; 5511
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neut- 5512

SuperHyperPerfect, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperPerfect and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 5514

that they form the Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; and the Extreme power is corresponded to 5519
its Extreme coefficient; 5520
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neut- 5521

SuperHyperPerfect, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperPerfect and C(N SHG) for a Neut- 5523
Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic Super- 5526
HyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 5527

and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 5528
Perfect; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient. 5529

SuperHyperPerfect, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 5533

SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect. 5539
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.

given Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect. 5547





C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E3i+13i=0 , E3i+243i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial 6z 8 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3i+17i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E15 , E16 , E17 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3 , V6 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .


3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {E3i+13i=0 , E23 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 5 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3i+13i=0 , V15 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 5 .


3 × 4 × 4z 3 .


3 × 2z 2 .


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V1 , Vii610=5,7,8 }.
i=4



3 × 3z 2 .






C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V2 , V7 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial =
(1 × 5 × 5) + (1 × 2 + 1)z 3 .


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .



C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E3i+1i=03 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V2i+1i=05 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 6 .





C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3 , V6 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
= 10 × 6 + 10 × 6 + 12 × 6 + 12 × 6z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect =

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect

.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
Proof. Let 5591
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

SuperHyperModel (31.1), is the SuperHyperPerfect. 5598
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect =

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect


.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
Proof. Let 5600
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (31.2), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect. 5607
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
Proof. Let 5609



the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect. 5618
Then 5620
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect

i
= (OTHERWISE).
{},
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
= (OTHERWISE)0.
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 5621
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL


based on SuperHyperPerfect could be applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every 5627
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperPerfect taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 5629

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Perfect. 5638

Then 5640

i
= (OTHERWISE).
{},
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
= (OTHERWISE)0.
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 5641
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperPerfect taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 5642



based on SuperHyperPerfect could be applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every 5647
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (31.5), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect. 5658
Then, 5660
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
Proof. Let 5661

is a longest SuperHyperPerfect taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 5662


at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions 5666
based on SuperHyperPerfect could be applied. The unique embedded SuperHyperPerfect 5667
proposes some longest SuperHyperPerfect excerpt from some representatives. The latter is 5668
perModel (31.6), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect. 5674

CHAPTER 41 5675
Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal But As 5676
Super Forms 5678
Definition 41.0.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal). 5679
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , such that 5683

Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 5684
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , such that 5685

(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , such that 5687

Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 5688
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , such that 5689

(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperTotal, 5691

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperTotal, and Neutrosophic 5692
rv-SuperHyperTotal. 5693
Definition 41.0.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperTotal). 5694
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperTotal, 5697

rv-SuperHyperTotal and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 5699
Extreme SuperHyperTotal; 5703
309
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperTotal, 5704

rv-SuperHyperTotal and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : 5706
form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal; 5710
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic 5711
e-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperTotal, 5712

and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperTotal and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 5713
SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive 5716
Extreme SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 5718
coefficient; 5719
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 5720
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic v- 5721

SuperHyperTotal, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperTotal and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic 5722
cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of 5725
high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic 5726
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal; and the 5727
Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient; 5728
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperTotal, 5729

rv-SuperHyperTotal and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 5731
Extreme SuperHyperTotal; 5735
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperTotal, 5736

rv-SuperHyperTotal and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : 5738

(V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 5739
form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal; 5742
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neut- 5743

rosophic e-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic v- 5744
SuperHyperTotal, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperTotal and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 5745

that they form the Extreme SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to 5750
its Extreme coefficient; 5751
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 5752
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic v- 5753

SuperHyperTotal, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperTotal and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic 5754
cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of 5757
high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic 5758

SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal; and the 5759
Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient. 5760

SuperHyperTotal, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 5764

SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal. 5770
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.

given Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal. 5778




C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi- = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {Ei+19i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial 20z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {Vi+19i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 20z 10 .




3 × 4 × 4z 3 .


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial 10z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {Vi+19i=0 }.


3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {E1 , E6 , E7 , E8 }.



C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , Vii68=4,5,6 }.
i=1









4 × 3z 3 .


4 × 3z 4 .


2 × 4 × 3z 4 .



C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 11z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {Vi+2i=011 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 11z 10 .


C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
= |(|V | − 1)z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {E1 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V2 }.


C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {V3 , V10 , V6 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3 × 6z 3 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal =

|E | −2
= {Ei }i=1ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
= z |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal
|E | −2
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −2
Proof. Let 5822
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...

SuperHyperModel (31.1), is the SuperHyperTotal. 5829
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal =

|E | −2
= {Ei }i=1ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality .
= (|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality − 1)
z |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal
|E | −2
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −2

Proof. Let 5831
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E |E|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 .
, V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1

Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (31.2), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal. 5838
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {Ei , Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

= |i(i − 1) | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {CEN T ER, Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
(|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |) choose (|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality | − 1)
z2.
Proof. Let 5840


the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal. 5849
Then 5851
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal

i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 5852
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

based on SuperHyperTotal could be applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every 5858
P :

V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperTotal taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 5860

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
Total. 5869
Then 5871

i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 5872
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

is a longest SuperHyperTotal taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 5873


based on SuperHyperTotal could be applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every 5878
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (31.5), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal. 5889
Then, 5891
∗
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {Ei , Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
∗
= |i(i − 1) | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality
|z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {CEN T ER, Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
(|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |) choose (|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality | − 1)
z2.

Proof. Let 5892
P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei∗ , CEN T ER, Ej .
is a longest SuperHyperTotal taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel ESHW : 5893


at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based 5897
on SuperHyperTotal could be applied. The unique embedded SuperHyperTotal proposes some 5898
longest SuperHyperTotal excerpt from some representatives. The latter is straightforward. 5899

perModel (31.6), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal. 5904

CHAPTER 42 5905
Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected But 5906
As The Extensions Excerpt From Dense 5907
And Super Forms 5908
Definition 42.0.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected). 5909

(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperConnected if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , such 5913
that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; and ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; 5914
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ 5915

E 0 , such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; and 5916
|Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 5917
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperConnected if ∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such 5918

that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; and ∀Vi , Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; 5919
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected if ∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such 5920

that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; ∀Vi , Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; and |Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = 5921
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperConnected,

5923
Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperConnected, and Neut- 5924
rosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected. 5925
Definition 42.0.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperConnected). 5926

(i) an Extreme SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperConnected,5929

rosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 5931
323
form the Extreme SuperHyperConnected; 5935
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic e- 5936

SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic v- 5937
SuperHyperConnected, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for a 5938

SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected; 5942
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neut- 5943
rosophic e-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic 5944

v-SuperHyperConnected, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for 5945
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 5952

Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected, Neutro- 5953
sophic v-SuperHyperConnected, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) 5954

SuperHyperConnected; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic 5960
coefficient; 5961
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperConnected,5962

rosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 5964
form the Extreme SuperHyperConnected; 5968
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic e- 5969

SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic v- 5970
SuperHyperConnected, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for a 5971
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected; 5975

(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neut- 5976

rosophic e-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic 5977
v-SuperHyperConnected, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for 5978

(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 5985

Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected, Neutro- 5986
sophic v-SuperHyperConnected, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) 5987

Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 5993
HyperConnected, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 5998
SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutro- 6000
sophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . 6001

The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no 6002
SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected. 6004
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.

given Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected. 6012

perConnected, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 6014

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {E1 , E2 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {Ei+19i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial 20z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {Vi+19i=0 }.


C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial 10z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected = {Vi+119
i=11
, V22 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 20z 10 .

3 × 4 × 4z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E1 , E6 , E7 , E8 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V5 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {E1 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 5z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , Vii68=4,5,6 }.
i=1


C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V5 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .



4 × 3z 3 .

4 × 3z 4 .


2 × 4 × 3z 4 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 11z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {Vi+2i=011 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 10z.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E3 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3 × 6z 3 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected =

|EESHG:(V,E) |
−2
= {Ei }i=1 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic −2
=z Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1 Cardinality
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
|E | −2
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality
Proof. Let 6056
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 .

SuperHyperModel (31.1), is the SuperHyperConnected. 6063
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected =

−2
= {Ei }i=1 .
= (|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality − 1)
z Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected

= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1 Cardinality
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
|E | −2
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality
Proof. Let 6065
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 .

Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (31.2), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected. 6072
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 6074



the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected. 6083
Then 6085
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected

i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 6086
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

P :

V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperConnected taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 6095

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
Connected. 6104
Then 6106
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected

i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 6107
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

is a longest SuperHyperConnected taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 6108


P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (31.5), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected. 6125
Then, 6127
∗
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ |E ∗ ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality |z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 6128

is a longest SuperHyperConnected taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 6129


to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperConnected. The latter is straightforward. 6132
Then there’s at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and 6133
the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperConnected could be applied. The unique 6134
embedded SuperHyperConnected proposes some longest SuperHyperConnected excerpt from 6135
perModel (31.6), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected. 6141

CHAPTER 43 6142
Background 6143


337












– 6300

Bibliography 6301

10.33140/JMTCM.01.03.09) 6312

tps://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 6327
341
prints202301.0282.v1). 6334
10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1). 6337
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 6342
prints202301.0262.v1). 6346
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 6352
prints202301.0105.v1). 6355
Preprints 2023, 2023010044 6361
10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 6364

(doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 6373

10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 6380
10.13140/RG.2.2.21510.45125). 6392
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13121.84321). 6395

10.13140/RG.2.2.11758.69441). 6398
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31891.35367). 6401
10.13140/RG.2.2.19360.87048). 6404
10.13140/RG.2.2.32363.21286). 6407

10.13140/RG.2.2.23266.81602). 6410
10.13140/RG.2.2.19911.37285). 6413
10.13140/RG.2.2.11050.90569). 6416
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17761.79206). 6419
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33275.80161). 6425
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30182.50241). 6428

2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17252.24968). 6461
2023010396 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 6473

2023, 2023010395 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 6476



2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36745.93289). 6490


10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 6497
prints202301.0267.v1).). 6500

(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 6505
prints202301.0262.v1). 6509

2023010224, (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 6515

10.13140/RG.2.2.35061.65767). 6518
10.13140/RG.2.2.18494.15680). 6522

10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 6526
10.13140/RG.2.2.15897.70243). 6530
10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 6534

prints202301.0105.v1). 6537

10.13140/RG.2.2.23172.19849). 6544
Preprints 2023, 2023010044 6556
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 6559
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28945.92007). 6562


10.13140/RG.2.2.35774.77123). 6568
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 6574

(doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 6580
10.13140/RG.2.2.19380.94084). 6583
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 6594

10.13140/RG.2.2.20993.12640). 6597


10.13140/RG.2.2.29173.86244). 6612

CHAPTER 44 6622
Books’ Contributions 6623
“Books’ Contributions”: | Featured Threads 6624

The following references are cited by chapters. 6625
6626
[Ref160] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of SuperHyperDi- 6627
mension In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, 6628
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15179.67361). 6629
6630
[Ref161] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 6631
Graph By SuperHyperDimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super Distances”, ResearchGate 6632

2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31956.88961). 6633
6634
The links to the contributions of this scientific research book are listed below. 6635
[Ref160] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of SuperHyperDi- 6636
mension In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, 6637
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15179.67361). 6638

6639
New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of SuperHyperDimension In Cancer’s 6640
Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph 6641
6642
ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368663387 6643
6644
Scribd: https://www.scribd.com/document/626943597 6645
6646
academia: https://www.academia.edu/97244962 6647
6648
ZENODO_ORG: https://zenodo.org/record/7659125 6649
Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of SuperHyperDimension 6650
10.13140/RG.2.2.15179.67361). 6652
#160th Article 6653
February 2023 6654
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15179.67361 6655
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 6656
351
Figure 44.1: Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of
SuperHyperDimension In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”,
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15179.67361).
Project: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs 6657

Available at WordPress ResearchGate Scribd academia ZENODO_ORG Amazon googlebooks 6658
GooglePlay [Ref161] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 6659
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super Distances”, 6660
6662
New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyper- 6663
Dimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super Distances 6664
6665
ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368663284 6666
6667
Scribd: https://www.scribd.com/document/626941521 6668

6669
academia: https://www.academia.edu/97244153 6670
6671
ZENODO_ORG: https://zenodo.org/record/7659101 6672
Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By 6673
SuperHyperDimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super Distances”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 6674

10.13140/RG.2.2.31956.88961). 6675
#161st Article 6676
February 2023 6677
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31956.88961 6678
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 6679
Project: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs 6680


Figure 44.4: Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyper-
Graph By SuperHyperDimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super Distances”, ResearchGate
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31956.88961).
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31956.88961).
Available at WordPress ResearchGate Scribd academia ZENODO_ORG Amazon googlebooks 6681

GooglePlay | Book #116 6682
| Title: Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs 6683
#Latest_Updates 6684
#The_Links 6685
| Available at WordPress Preprints_org ResearchGate Scribd academia ZENODO_ORG Twitter 6686
LinkedIn Amazon googlebooks GooglePlay 6687
– 6688
6689

2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31956.88961).
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31956.88961).

6691
#The_Links 6692
6693
| Book #116 6694
6695
|Title: Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs 6696
6697
| Available at WordPress ResearchGate Scribd academia ZENODO_ORG Twitter facebook 6698
LinkedIn Tumblrsupport tumblr Amazon googlebooks GooglePlay 6699
6700
– 6701
6702
| Publisher | 6703
(Paperback): https://www.amazon.com/dp/- 6704
(Hardcover): https://www.amazon.com/dp/- 6705
(Kindle Edition): https://www.amazon.com/dp/- 6706
6707
– 6708
6709
| ISBN | 6710
(Paperback): - 6711
(Hardcover): - 6712
(Kindle Edition): CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 6713
(EBook): CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 6714

6715
– 6716
6717
| Print length | 6718
(Paperback): - pages 6719
(Hardcover): - 6720
(Kindle Edition): - pages 6721
(E-Book): 460 pages 6722
6723
– 6724
6725
6727
#The_Links 6728
6729
| ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368663443 6730
6731
| WordPress: https://drhenrygarrett.wordpress.com/2023/02/22/Dimension-In-SuperHyperGraphs/6732
6733
@Scribd: https://www.scribd.com/document/- 6734
6735
| academia: https://www.academia.edu/97246270 6736

6737
| ZENODO_ORG: https://zenodo.org/record/7659162 6738
6739
| googlebooks: https://books.google.com/books/about?id=- 6740
6741
| GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=- 6742
6743
6744

Figure 44.8: “#116th Book” || Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs February 2023 License: CC

BY-NC-ND 4.0 Project: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs
Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs (Published Version) 6745
6746
The Link: 6747
6748
https://drhenrygarrett.wordpress.com/2023/02/18/Dimension-In-SuperHyperGraphs/ 6749
6750
– 6751
6752
Posted by Dr. Henry Garrett 6753
6754
February 22, 2023 6755
6756
Posted in 0116 | Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs 6757
6758
Tags: 6759
Applications, Applied Mathematics, Applied Research, Cancer, Cancer’s Recognitions, Combin- 6760
atorics, Edge, Edges, Graph Theory, Graphs, Latest Research, Literature Reviews, Modeling, 6761
Neutrosophic Graph, Neutrosophic Graph Theory, Neutrosophic Science, Neutrosophic Su- 6762
perHyperClasses, Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Theory, 6763
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs, Neutrosophic Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs, Open Problems, 6764

Open Questions, Problems, Pure Math, Pure Mathematics, Questions, Real-World Applica- 6765
tions, Recent Research, Recognitions, Research, scientific research Article, scientific research 6766
Articles, scientific research Book, scientific research Chapter, scientific research Chapters, Review, 6767
SuperHyperClasses, SuperHyperEdges, SuperHyperGraph, SuperHyperGraph Theory, Super- 6768
HyperGraphs, Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs, SuperHyperModeling, SuperHyperVertices, 6769
Theoretical Research, Vertex, Vertices. 6770




In this scientific research book, there are some scientific research chapters on “Extreme Di- 6771
mension In SuperHyperGraphs” and “Neutrosophic Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs” about 6772
some researches on Extreme Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs and neutrosophic Dimension In 6773
SuperHyperGraphs. 6774

CHAPTER 45 6775
“SuperHyperGraph-Based Books”: | 6776
Featured Tweets 6777
“SuperHyperGraph-Based Books”: | Featured Tweets 6778
361
Figure 45.1: “SuperHyperGraph-Based Books”: | Featured Tweets

Figure 45.2: “SuperHyperGraph-Based Books”: | Featured Tweets

Figure 45.3: “SuperHyperGraph-Based Books”: | Featured Tweets #69
























CHAPTER 46 6779
CV 6780
389
6781
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett @gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett CV
Status: Known As Henry Garrett With Highly Productive Style.
Fields: Combinatorics, Algebraic Structures, Algebraic Hyperstructures, Fuzzy

Logic
Prefers: Graph Theory, Domination, Metric Dimension, Neutrosophic Graph

Theory, Neutrosophic Domination, Lattice Theory, Groups and
Hypergroups
Activities: Traveling, Painting, Writing, Reading books and Papers
Professional Experiences
2017 - Present Continuous Member AMS
I tried to show them that Science is not only interesting, it’s beautiful and exciting.
Participating in the academic space of the largest mathematical Society gave me valuable
experiences. The use of Bulletin and Notice of the American Mathematical Society is another
benefit of this presence.
2017 - 2019 Continuous Member EMS
The use Newsletter of the European Mathematical Society is benefit of this membership.
I am interested in giving a small, though small, effect on math epidemic progress
Awards and Achievements
Dec 2022 Award: Selected as a Reviewer @SciencePG
Award: Selected as Reviewer to Journal of American Journal of Computer

Science and Technology, Science Publishing Group, USA, @SciencePG:
https://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/journal/index?journalid=303
American Journal of Computer Science and Technology, Science Publishing Group, USA,
@SciencePG: https://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/journal/index?journalid=303; PDF:
https://drhenrygarrett.files.wordpress.com/2023/02/certificate_for_reviewer-2.pdf
Sep 2022 Award: Selected as an Editorial Board Member to JMTCM JMTCM
Award: Selected as an Editorial Board Member to Journal of Mathematical Techniques and

Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)
Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)
Jun 2022 Award: Selected as an Editorial Board Member to JCTCSR JCTCSR
Award: Selected as an Editorial Board Member to Journal of Current Trends in Computer

Science Research(JCTCSR)
Journal of Current Trends in Computer Science Research(JCTCSR)
Jan 23, 2022 Award: Diploma By Neutrosophic Science International Association Neutrosophic Science International
Association
Award: Distinguished Achievements

Honorary Membership; PDF: https://drhenrygarrett.files.wordpress.com/2023/02/neutrosophicdiploma-
henry-garrett.pdf
Journal Referee
Sep 2022 Editorial Board Member to JMTCM JMTCM

6782
Editorial Board Member to Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational

Mathematics(JMTCM)
Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)
Jun 2022 Editorial Board Member to JCTCSR JCTCSR
Editorial Board Member to Journal of Current Trends in Computer Science

Research(JCTCSR)
Journal of Current Trends in Computer Science Research(JCTCSR)
6783
Publications: Articles
2023 159 Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph

By SuperHyperDominating As Hyper Closing On Super Messy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:
10.13140/RG.2.2.21510.45125).
@ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368599405
@Scribd: https://www.scribd.com/document/626381737
@ZENODO_ORG: https://zenodo.org/record/7650464
@academia: https://www.academia.edu/97068321
2023 158 Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of SuperHyperDominating

In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:
10.13140/RG.2.2.13121.84321).
2023 157 Manuscript

By SuperHyperConnected As Hyper Group On Super Surge”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:
10.13140/RG.2.2.11758.69441).
@Scribd: https://www.scribd.com/document/-
2023 156 Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of

SuperHyperConnected In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”,
2023 155 Manuscript

By SuperHyperTotal As Hyper Covering On Super Infections”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:
10.13140/RG.2.2.19360.87048).
2023 154 Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of SuperHyperTotal

In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:
10.13140/RG.2.2.32363.21286).
2023 153 Manuscript

6784
Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of SuperHyperPerfect

In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:
10.13140/RG.2.2.23266.81602).
2023 152 Manuscript

By SuperHyperPerfect As Hyper Idealism On Super Vacancy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:
10.13140/RG.2.2.19911.37285).
@Scribd: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368537004
2023 151 Manuscript

By SuperHyperJoin As Hyper Separations On Super Sorts”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:
10.13140/RG.2.2.11050.90569).
2023 150 Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections

Of SuperHyperJoin In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”,
2023 149 Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions

Of SuperHyperDuality In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34953.52320).
2023 148 Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph

By SuperHyperDuality As Hyper Imaginations On Super Mixed-Illustrations”, ResearchGate
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33275.80161).
2023 147 Manuscript

6785
Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph
By Path SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Correction On Super Faults”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:
10.13140/RG.2.2.30182.50241).
2023 146 Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Reflections By Hyper Rotations Of

Path SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33459.30243).
2023 145 Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Deformations On Super Chains In Cancer’s

Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDensity”,
2023 144 Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Ignorance By SuperHyperDensity On Super Resistances

In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate
2023, (doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.16800.05123).
2023 143 Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph

By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As Hyper Covering Versus Super
separations-VI”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482).
@WordPress: -
2023 142 Manuscript

separations-V”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809).
@WordPress: -
@Scribd:https://www.scribd.com/document/624023778
2023 141 Manuscript

6786
separations-IV”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34946.96960).
@WordPress: -
2023 140 Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “A Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph

separations-III”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14814.31040).
@WordPress: -
2023 139 Manuscript

separations-II”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.17125).
@WordPress: -
2023 138 Manuscript

separations-I”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.25719.50089).
@WordPress: -
2023 137 Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Disruptions In Cancer’s Extreme Recognition

As Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By Hyper Plans Called SuperHyperConnectivities”,
@WordPress: -
2023 136 Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition As Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph

By SuperHyperConnectivities As Hyper Diagnosis On Super Mechanism”, ResearchGate 2023,
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17252.24968).
@WordPress: -
2023 135 Manuscript

6787
Henry Garrett,“Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph By the

Criteria of Eulerian and Hamiltonian Type-Sets As Hyper Modified Cycles On Super Mess”,
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16652.59525).
@WordPress: -
2023 134 Manuscript
Henry Garrett,“Eulerian and Hamiltonian In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and

Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph On Super Interactions By Hyper Extensions of Cycles”,
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34583.24485).
@WordPress: -
2023 Article133 (JMTCM) Article
Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic
Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s
Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) (2023) 35-47.
(https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/some-super-hyper-degrees-
and-cosuper-hyper-degrees-on-neutrosophic-super-hyper-graphs-and-super-hyper-graphs-
alongside-a.pdf)
The links to PDF, its abstract, its citation and the volume are as follows.
PDF:https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/some-super-hyper-degrees-
and-cosuper-hyper-degrees-on-neutrosophic-super-hyper-graphs-and-super-hyper-graphs-
alongside-a.pdf
Abstract:https://www.opastpublishers.com/peer-review/some-super-hyper-degrees-and-
cosuper-hyper-degrees-on-neutrosophic-super-hyper-graphs-and-super-hyper-graphs-
alongside-a-5009.html
Citation:https://www.opastpublishers.com/citation/some-super-hyper-degrees-and-cosuper-
hyper-degrees-on-neutrosophic-super-hyper-graphs-and-super-hyper-graphs-alongside-a-
5009.html
Volume:https://www.opastpublishers.com/table-contents/jmtcm-volume-2-issue-1-year-2023
2023 132 Manuscript
Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Type-Results on extreme SuperHyperGirth theory and

(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs Toward Cancer’s extreme Recognition”, Preprints 2023,
2023010396 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1).
@WordPress: -
@PrePrints_ORG: https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202301.0396/v1
@ZENODO_ORG:https://zenodo.org/record/7559540
2023 131 Manuscript
Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Warns Hyper Landmark of neutrosophic

SuperHyperGirth In Super Type-Versions of Cancer’s neutrosophic Recognition”, Preprints
2023, 2023010395 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1).
@WordPress: -
@PrePrints_ORG: https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202301.0395/v1
2023 130 Manuscript

6788
Henry Garrett,“The Constructions of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs on the Cancer’s

Recognition in The Confrontation With Super Attacks In Hyper Situations By Implementing
(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in The Technical Approaches to Neutralize
SuperHyperViews”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.26240.51204).
@WordPress: -
2023 129 Manuscript
Henry Garrett,“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing As the Entrepreneurs on

Cancer’s Recognitions To Fail Forcing Style As the Super Classes With Hyper Effects In The
Background of the Framework is So-Called (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.12818.73925).
@WordPress: -
2023 128 Manuscript
Henry Garrett,“Super Actions On The Types of Hyper Levels In The Sensible

Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth On Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.88960).
@WordPress: -
2023 127 Manuscript
Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Approaches on the Super Challenges on the Cancer’s

Recognition In the Hyper Model of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate
2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36745.93289).
@WordPress: -
@ResearchGate:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367336398
2023 0126 | Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition Manuscript
as the Model in The Setting of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs
Henry Garrett,“Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of Confrontation under
Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”,
Preprints 2023, 2023010308 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1).
Available at Twitter, ResearchGate, Scribd, Academia, Zenodo, LinkedIn
2023 0125 | Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Manuscript
Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s
Recognition
Henry Garrett,“Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The Foggy
Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside Neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010282 (doi:
10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1).
2023 0124 | Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic Manuscript
SuperHyperGraphs
6789
Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s

Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010267 (doi:
10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1).).
2023 0123 | The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and Affected Cells Toward The Totality Manuscript
Under Cancer’s Recognition By New Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers
In The (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph
Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and Affected Cells
Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New Multiple Definitions On the Sets
Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based
on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi:
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1).
2023 0122 | Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The Worst Case of Full Manuscript
Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic)
SuperHyperGraphs
Henry Garrett,“Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s
Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010262,(doi:
10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1).
2023 0121 | Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the Cancer’s Neutrosophic Manuscript
Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs
Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in Neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1).
2023 0120 | Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s Circumstances Where Cancer’s Manuscript
Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs
Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s Circumstances Where
Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224,
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1).
2023 0119 | SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To Monitor Cancer’s Recognition Manuscript
In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs
Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To Monitor
Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi:
10.13140/RG.2.2.35061.65767).
2023 0118 | The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The Cancer’s Extreme Recognition Manuscript
With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic)
SuperHyperGraphs
Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The
Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching
Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi:
10.13140/RG.2.2.18494.15680).
2023 0117 | Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front of Cancer’s Attacks In Manuscript
The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called Neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraphs
Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the Cancer’s
Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By SuperHyperModels Named
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15897.70243).
6790
2023 0116 | Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the Cancer’s Recognition Manuscript
in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic)
SuperHyperGraphs
Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the Cancer’s
Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By SuperHyperModels Named
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922).
2023 0115 | (Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) Manuscript
SuperHyperGraphs
Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010105 (doi:
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1).
2023 0114 | Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Forwarding Manuscript
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs
Henry Garrett,“Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition
Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”,
2023 0113 | Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded Regions and Sub-Regions in Manuscript
the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic)
SuperHyperClique
Henry Garrett,“Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded Regions and Sub-
Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23172.19849).
2023 0112 | Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling Manuscript
in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs
Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic)
SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”,
2023 0111 | Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Manuscript

Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints
Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints”,
2023 0110 | Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled neutrosophic Failed Manuscript
SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraphs
Henry Garrett,“Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled neutrosophic
Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition modeled in the Form of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17385.36968).
2022 0109 | 0039 | Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as (Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring Manuscript
alongside (Dual)Dominating in (Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph
Garrett, Henry. “0039 | Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as (Dual)Resolving and
(Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in (Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph.” CERN
European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European
Organization for Nuclear Research, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6319942.
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942
2022 0108 | 0049 | (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript

6791
Garrett, Henry. “0049 | (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs.” CERN

European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 2022. CERN European
Organization for Nuclear Research, https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724.
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724
2023 0107 | Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic Manuscript
SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond
Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction To
Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond”,
Preprints 2023, 2023010044
2023 0106 | (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by Well-SuperHyperModelled Manuscript

(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs
Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by Well-
SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010043 (doi:
10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1).
2022 0105 | Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs Article
and Their Directions in Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes
Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic
Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper
Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) (2022) 242-263.
2023 0104 | Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Manuscript
Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs
Henry Garrett,“Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”,
2023 0103 | Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Manuscript

Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints
Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints”,
2023 0102 | (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by Well-SuperHyperModelled Manuscript

(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs
Henry Garrett,“(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by
Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:
10.13140/RG.2.2.35774.77123).
2022 0101 | Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic Manuscript
SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond
Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction To
Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond”,
2022 0100 | (Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) Manuscript
SuperHyperGraphs
Henry Garrett,“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642).
2022 0099 | Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling Manuscript
in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs
6792
Henry Garrett,“Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic)

SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”,
2022 0098 | (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions Featuring (Neutrosophic) Manuscript

SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances
Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions Featuring
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 2022, 2022120549 (doi:
10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1).
2022 0098 | (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions Featuring (Neutrosophic) Manuscript

SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances
Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, ResearchGate 2022,
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19380.94084).
2022 0097 | (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive and SuperHyperOffensive Manuscript

Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling
of Cancer’s Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses

Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive and
SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph With
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic)
SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1).
2022 0097 | (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive and SuperHyperOffensive Manuscript

Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling
of Cancer’s Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses

Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive and
SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph With
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic)
SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14426.41923).
2022 0096 | SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Manuscript

SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions
Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, Preprints 2022,
2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1).
2022 0096 | SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Manuscript

SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions
Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, ResearchGate
2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20993.12640).
2022 0095 | Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Manuscript

and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments
Henry Garrett,“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on Neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”,
2022 0095 | Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Manuscript

And SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments
Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on Neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraphs And SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”,
ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23123.04641).
6793
2022 0094 | SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Manuscript
Their Directions in Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses
Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1).
2022 0094 | SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Manuscript

Their Directions in Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses
Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23324.56966).
2022 0093 | Neutrosophic Co-degree and Neutrosophic Degree alongside Chromatic Numbers in the Setting Article
of Some Classes Related to Neutrosophic Hypergraphs
Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Co-degree and Neutrosophic Degree alongside Chromatic
Numbers in the Setting of Some Classes Related to Neutrosophic Hypergraphs”, J Curr Trends
Comp Sci Res 1(1) (2022) 06-14.
PDF,Abstract,Issue.
2022 0092 | Recognition of the Pattern for Vertices to Make Dimension by Resolving in some Classes of Manuscript
Neutrosophic Graphs
Henry Garrett, “Recognition of the Pattern for Vertices to Make Dimension
by Resolving in some Classes of Neutrosophic Graphs”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi:
10.13140/RG.2.2.27281.51046).
2022 0091 | Regularity of Every Element to Function in the Type of Domination in Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Regularity of Every Element to Function in the Type of Domination in

Neutrosophic Graphs”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22861.10727).
2022 0090 | Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some Neutrosophic Notions Based on Manuscript
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)
Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some Neutrosophic
Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph
(NSHG)”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160).
2022 0089 | Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating and Manuscript
Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph
Henry Garrett, “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning Neutrosophic
SuperHyperDominating and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in Neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29173.86244).
2022 0088 | Seeking Empty Subgraphs To Determine Different Measurements in Some Classes of Manuscript
Neutrosophic Graphs
Henry Garrett, “Seeking Empty Subgraphs To Determine Different Measurements in Some
Classes of Neutrosophic Graphs”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30448.53766).
2022 0087 | Impacts of Isolated Vertices To Cover Other Vertices in Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Impacts of Isolated Vertices To Cover Other Vertices in Neutrosophic

Graphs”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16185.44647).
2022 0086 | Perfect Locating of All Vertices in Some Classes of Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
6794
Henry Garrett, “Perfect Locating of All Vertices in Some Classes of Neutrosophic Graphs”,
2022 0085 | Complete Connections Between Vertices in Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Complete Connections Between Vertices in Neutrosophic Graphs”,

2022 0084 | Unique Distance Differentiation By Collection of Vertices in Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Unique Distance Differentiation By Collection of Vertices in Neutrosophic

2022 0083 | Single Connection Amid Vertices From Two Given Sets Partitioning Vertex Set in Some Classes Manuscript
of Neutrosophic Graphs
Henry Garrett, “Single Connection Amid Vertices From Two Given Sets Partitioning
Vertex Set in Some Classes of Neutrosophic Graphs”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi:
10.13140/RG.2.2.32189.33764).
2022 0082 | Separate Joint-Sets Representing Separate Numbers Where Classes of Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
and Applications are Cases of Study
Henry Garrett, “Separate Joint-Sets Representing Separate Numbers Where Classes
of Neutrosophic Graphs and Applications are Cases of Study”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi:
10.13140/RG.2.2.22666.95686).
2022 0081 | Repetitive Joint-Sets Featuring Multiple Numbers For Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Repetitive Joint-Sets Featuring Multiple Numbers For Neutrosophic

2022 0080 | Dual-Resolving Numbers Excerpt from Some Classes of Neutrosophic Graphs With Some Manuscript
Applications
Henry Garrett, “Dual-Resolving Numbers Excerpt from Some Classes of Neutrosophic
Graphs With Some Applications”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14971.39200).
2022 0079 | Dual-Dominating Numbers in Neutrosophic Setting and Crisp Setting Obtained From Classes Manuscript
of Neutrosophic Graphs
Henry Garrett, “Dual-Dominating Numbers in Neutrosophic Setting and Crisp
Setting Obtained From Classes of Neutrosophic Graphs”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi:
10.13140/RG.2.2.19925.91361).
2022 0078 | Neutrosophic Path-Coloring Numbers BasedOn Endpoints In Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Path-Coloring Numbers BasedOn Endpoints In Neutrosophic

2022 0077 | Neutrosophic Dominating Path-Coloring Numbers in New Visions of Classes of Neutrosophic Manuscript
Graphs
Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Dominating Path-Coloring Numbers in New Visions of Classes
of Neutrosophic Graphs”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32151.65445).
2022 0076 | Path Coloring Numbers of Neutrosophic Graphs Based on Shared Edges and Neutrosophic Manuscript
Cardinality of Edges With Some Applications from Real-World Problems
6795
Henry Garrett, “Path Coloring Numbers of Neutrosophic Graphs Based on Shared Edges
and Neutrosophic Cardinality of Edges With Some Applications from Real-World Problems”,
2022 0075 | Neutrosophic Collapsed Numbers in the Viewpoint of Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Collapsed Numbers in the Viewpoint of Neutrosophic Graphs”,

2022 0074 | Bulky Numbers of Classes of Neutrosophic Graphs Based on Neutrosophic Edges Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Bulky Numbers of Classes of Neutrosophic Graphs Based on Neutrosophic

Edges”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.24204.18564).
2022 0073 | Dense Numbers and Minimal Dense Sets of Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Dense Numbers and Minimal Dense Sets of Neutrosophic Graphs”,
2022 0072 | Connectivities of Neutrosophic Graphs in the terms of Crisp Cycles Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Connectivities of Neutrosophic Graphs in the terms of Crisp Cycles”,

2022 0071 | Strong Paths Defining Connectivities in Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Strong Paths Defining Connectivities in Neutrosophic Graphs”,

2022 0070 | Finding Longest Weakest Paths assigning numbers to some Classes of Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Finding Longest Weakest Paths assigning numbers to some Classes of
Neutrosophic Graphs”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35579.59689).
April 12, 2022 0069 | Properties of SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Article
Henry Garrett, “Properties of SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic

SuperHyperGraph”, Neutrosophic Sets and Systems 49 (2022) 531-561 (doi:
10.5281/zenodo.6456413). (http://fs.unm.edu/NSS/NeutrosophicSuperHyperGraph34.pdf).
(https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nss
j ournal/vol49/iss1/34).
Available at NSS, NSS Gallery, UNM Digital Repository, Twitter, ResearchGate, Scribd,
Academia, Zenodo, LinkedIn
2022 0068 | Relations and Notions amid Hamiltonicity and Eulerian Notions in Some Classes of Manuscript
Neutrosophic Graphs
Henry Garrett, “Relations and Notions amid Hamiltonicity and Eulerian Notions in Some
Classes of Neutrosophic Graphs”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35579.59689).
2022 0067 | Eulerian Results In Neutrosophic Graphs With Applications Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Eulerian Results In Neutrosophic Graphs With Applic- ations”,

6796
2022 0066 | Finding Hamiltonian Neutrosophic Cycles in Classes of Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Finding Hamiltonian Neutrosophic Cycles in Classes of Neutrosophic

2022 0065 | Extending Sets Type-Results in Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Extending Sets Type-Results in Neutrosophic Graphs”, ResearchGate 2022

(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13317.01767).
2022 0064 | Some Polynomials Related to Numbers in Classes of (Strong) Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Some Polynomials Related to Numbers in Classes of (Strong) Neutrosophic

2022 0063 | Finding Shortest Sequences of Consecutive Vertices in Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Finding Shortest Sequences of Consecutive Vertices in Neutrosophic

2022 0062 | Neutrosophic Girth Based On Crisp Cycle in Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Girth Based On Crisp Cycle in Neutrosophic Graphs”,

2022 0061 | e-Matching Number and e-Matching Polynomials in Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “e-Matching Number and e-Matching Polynomials in Neutrosophic Graphs”,

2022 0060 | Matching Polynomials in Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Matching Polynomials in Neutrosophic Graphs”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi:

10.13140/RG.2.2.33630.72002).
2022 0059 | Some Results in Classes Of Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Some Results in Classes Of Neutrosophic Graphs”, Preprints 2022,

2022030248 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202203.0248.v1).
2022 0058 | Matching Number in Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Matching Number in Neutrosophic Graphs”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi:

10.13140/RG.2.2.18609.86882).
2022 0057 | Fuzzy Dominating Number Based On Fuzzy Bridge And Applicaions Article
M. Hamidi, and M. Nikfar, “Fuzzy Dominating Number Based On Fuzzy

Bridge And Applicaions”, Fuzzy Systems and its Applications 4(2) (2022) 205-229
(https://doi.org/10.22034/jfsa.2022.306606.1092).
2022 0057 | Fuzzy Dominating Number Based On Fuzzy Bridge And Applicaions Article
6797
M. Hamidi, Mohammad, and M. Nikfar. "Domination Number Based on Fuzzy Bridge And
Application."JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL EXTENSION 17 (2023).
Oct 2018 0056 | The Effects of Mathematics on Computer Sciences Conference Article
M. Nikfar, “The Effects of Mathematics on Computer Sciences”, Second Conference

on the Education and Applications of Mathematics, Kermanshah, Iran, 2018
(https://en.civilica.com/doc/824659).
2022 0055 | (Failed) 1-clique Number in Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “(Failed) 1-Clique Number in Neutrosophic Graphs”, ResearchGate 2022

(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14241.89449).
2022 0054 | Failed Clique Number in Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Failed Clique Number in Neutrosophic Graphs”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi:
10.13140/RG.2.2.36039.16800).
2022 0053 | Clique Number in Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Clique Number in Neutrosophic Graphs”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi:

10.13140/RG.2.2.28338.68800).
2022 0052 | (Failed) 1-independent Number in Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “(Failed) 1-Independent Number in Neutrosophic Graphs”, ResearchGate

2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30593.12643).
2022 0051 | Failed Independent Number in Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Failed Independent Number in Neutrosophic Graphs”, Preprints 2022,

2022020334 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202202.0334.v2)
2022 0051 | Failed Independent Number in Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Failed Independent Number in Neutrosophic Graphs”, ResearchGate 2022

(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31196.05768).
2022 0050 | Independent Set in Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Independent Set in Neutrosophic Graphs”, Preprints 2022, 2022020334 (doi:
10.20944/preprints202202.0334.v1).
2022 0050 | Independent Set in Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Independent Set in Neutrosophic Graphs”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi:

10.13140/RG.2.2.17472.81925).
2022 0049 | (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript

6798
Henry Garrett, “(Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs”, ResearchGate

2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35241.26724).
2022 0048 | Failed Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Failed Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs”, Preprints 2022,

2022020343 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202202.0343.v1).
2022 0048 | Failed Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Failed Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs”, ResearchGate 2022

(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.24873.47209).
2022 0047 | Zero Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Zero Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi:
10.13140/RG.2.2.32265.93286).
2022 0046 | Quasi-Number in Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Quasi-Number in Neutrosophic Graphs”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi:

10.13140/RG.2.2.18470.60488).
2022 0045 | Quasi-Degree in Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Quasi-Degree in Neutrosophic Graphs”, Preprints 2022, 2022020100 (doi:

10.20944/preprints202202.0100.v1).
2022 0045 | Quasi-Degree in Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Quasi-Degree in ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.25460.01927).

2022 0044 | Co-Neighborhood in Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Co-Neighborhood in Neutrosophic Graphs”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi:

10.13140/RG.2.2.17687.44964).
2022 0043 | Global Powerful Alliance in Strong Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Global Powerful Alliance in Strong Neutrosophic Graphs”, Preprints 2022,
2022010429 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202201.0429.v1).
2022 0043 | Global Powerful Alliance in Strong Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Global Powerful Alliance in Strong Neutrosophic Graphs”, ResearchGate

2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31784.24322).
2022 0042 | Global Offensive Alliance in Strong Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Global Offensive Alliance in Strong Neutrosophic Graphs”, Preprints 2022,
2022010429 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202201.0429.v1).
6799
2022 0042 | Global Offensive Alliance in Strong Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Global Offensive Alliance in Strong Neutrosophic Graphs”, ResearchGate

2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.26541.20961).
2022 0041 | Three Types of Neutrosophic Alliances based on Connectedness and (Strong) Edges Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Three Types of Neutrosophic Alliances based on Connectedness and (Strong)
Edges”, Preprints 2022, 2022010239 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202201.0239.v1).
2022 0041 | Three Types of Neutrosophic Alliances based on Connectedness and (Strong) Edges Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Three Types of Neutrosophic Alliances based on Connectedness and (Strong)
Edges”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18486.83521).
2022 0040 | Three types of neutrosophic alliances based of connectedness and (strong) edges (In-Progress) Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Three types of neutrosophic alliances based of connectedness and (strong)
edges (In-Progress)”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27570.12480).
2022 0039 | Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as (Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as (Dual)Resolving and
(Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in (Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints
2022, 2022010145 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202201.0145.v1).
2022 0039 | Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as (Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as (Dual)Resolving
and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in (Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph”,
ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18909.54244/1).
2022 0038 | Co-degree and Degree of classes of Neutrosophic Hypergraphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Co-degree and Degree of classes of Neutrosophic Hypergraphs”, Preprints

2022, 2022010027 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202201.0027.v1).
2022 0038 | Co-degree and Degree of classes of Neutrosophic Hypergraphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Co-degree and Degree of classes of Neutrosophic Hypergraphs”,

2021 0037 | Dimension and Coloring alongside Domination in Neutrosophic Hypergraphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Dimension and Coloring alongside Domination in Neutrosophic

Hypergraphs”, Preprints 2021, 2021120448 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202112.0448.v1).
2021 0037 | Dimension and Coloring alongside Domination in Neutrosophic Hypergraphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Dimension and Coloring alongside Domination in Neutrosophic

Hypergraphs”, ResearchGate 2021 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13070.28483).
2021 0036 | Different Types of Neutrosophic Chromatic Number Manuscript

6800
Henry Garrett, “Different Types of Neutrosophic Chromatic Number”, Preprints 2021,

2021120335 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202112.0335.v1).
2021 0036 | Different Types of Neutrosophic Chromatic Number Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Different Types of Neutrosophic Chromatic Number”, ResearchGate 2021

(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19068.46723).
2021 0035 | Neutrosophic Chromatic Number Based on Connectedness Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Chromatic Number Based on Connectedness”, Preprints 2021,

2021120226 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202112.0226.v1).
2021 0035 | Neutrosophic Chromatic Number Based on Connectedness Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Chromatic Number Based on Connectedness”, ResearchGate

2021 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18563.84001).
2021 0034 | Chromatic Number and Neutrosophic Chromatic Number Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Chromatic Number and Neutrosophic Chromatic Number”, Preprints 2021,
2021120177 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202112.0177.v1).
2021 0034 | Chromatic Number and Neutrosophic Chromatic Number Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Chromatic Number and Neutrosophic Chromatic Number”, ResearchGate

2021 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36035.73766).
2021 0033 | Metric Dimension in fuzzy(neutrosophic) Graphs #12 Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Metric Dimension in fuzzy(neutrosophic) Graphs #12”, ResearchGate 2021

(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20690.48322).

(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29308.46725).

(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21614.54085).

(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34040.16648).

(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19464.96007).
6801
2021 0028 | Metric Dimension in fuzzy(neutrosophic) Graphs-VII Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Metric Dimension in fuzzy(neutrosophic) Graphs-VII”, ResearchGate 2021

(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14667.72481).
2021 0028 | Metric Dimension in fuzzy(neutrosophic) Graphs-VII Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Metric Dimension in fuzzy(neutrosophic) Graphs-VII”, Preprints 2021,

2021110142 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202111.0142.v7).
2021 0027 | Metric Dimension in fuzzy(neutrosophic) Graphs-VI Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Metric Dimension in fuzzy(neutrosophic) Graphs-VI”, Preprints 2021,

2021110142 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202111.0142.v6).
2021 0026 | Metric Dimension in fuzzy(neutrosophic) Graphs-V Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Metric Dimension in fuzzy(neutrosophic) Graphs-V”, Preprints 2021,

2021110142 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202111.0142.v5).
2021 0025 | Metric Dimension in fuzzy(neutrosophic) Graphs-IV Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Metric Dimension in fuzzy(neutrosophic) Graphs-IV”, Preprints 2021,

2021110142 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202111.0142.v4).
2021 0024 | Metric Dimension in fuzzy(neutrosophic) Graphs-III Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Metric Dimension in fuzzy(neutrosophic) Graphs-III”, Preprints 2021,

2021110142 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202111.0142.v3).
2021 0023 | Metric Dimension in fuzzy(neutrosophic) Graphs-II Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Metric Dimension in fuzzy(neutrosophic) Graphs-II”, Preprints 2021,

2021110142 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202111.0142.v2).
2021 0022 | Metric Dimension in Fuzzy Graphs and Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Metric Dimension in Fuzzy Graphs and Neutrosophic Graphs”, Preprints
2021, 2021110142 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202111.0142.v1)
2021 0021 | Valued Number And Set Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Valued Number And Set”, Preprints 2021, 2021080229 (doi:
10.20944/preprints202108.0229.v1).
2021 0020 | Notion of Valued Set Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Notion of Valued Set”, Preprints 2021, 2021070410 (doi:

10.20944/preprints202107.0410.v1).
2021 0019 | Set And Its Operations Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Set And Its Operations”, Preprints 2021, 2021060508 (doi:
10.20944/preprints202106.0508.v1).
6802
2021 0018 | Metric Dimensions Of Graphs Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Metric Dimensions Of Graphs”, Preprints 2021, 2021060392 (doi:

10.20944/preprints202106.0392.v1).
2021 0017 | New Graph Of Graph Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “New Graph Of Graph”, Preprints 2021, 2021060323 (doi:

10.20944/preprints202106.0323.v1).
2021 0016 | Numbers Based On Edges Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Numbers Based On Edges”, Preprints 2021, 2021060315 (doi:

10.20944/preprints202106.0315.v1).
2021 0015 | Locating And Location Number Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Locating And Location Number”, Preprints 2021, 2021060206 (doi:
10.20944/preprints202106.0206.v1).
2021 0014 | Big Sets Of Vertices Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Big Sets Of Vertices”, Preprints 2021, 2021060189 (doi:

10.20944/preprints202106.0189.v1).
2021 0013 | Matroid And Its Outlines Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Matroid And Its Outlines”, Preprints 2021, 2021060146 (doi:
10.20944/preprints202106.0146.v1).
2021 0012 | Matroid And Its Relations Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Matroid And Its Relations”, Preprints 2021, 2021060080 (doi:
10.20944/preprints202106.0080.v1).
2021 0011 | Metric Number in Dimension Manuscript
Henry Garrett, “Metric Number in Dimension”, Preprints 2021, 2021060004 (doi:

10.20944/preprints202106.0004.v1).
2018 0010 | A Study on Domination in two Fuzzy Models Manuscript
M. Nikfar, “A Study on Domination in two Fuzzy Models”, Preprints 2018, 2018040119 (doi:
10.20944/preprints201804.0119.v2).
2019 0009 | Nikfar Domination Versus Others: Restriction, Extension Theorems and Monstrous Examples Manuscript
M. Nikfar, “Nikfar Domination Versus Others: Restriction, Extension Theorems and

Monstrous Examples”, Preprints 2019, 2019010024 (doi: 10.20944/preprints201901.0024.v3).
2019 0008 | Nikfar Dominations: Definitions, Theorems, and Connections Manuscript
M. Nikfar, “Nikfar Dominations: Definitions, Theorems, and Connections”, ResearchGate

2019 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28955.31526/1).
6803
2019 0007 | Nikfar Domination in Fuzzy Graphs Manuscript
M. Nikfar, “Nikfar Domination in Fuzzy Graphs”, Preprints 2019, 2019010024 (doi:

10.20944/preprints201901.0024.v2).

10.20944/preprints201901.0024.v2).
2018 0005 | The Results on Vertex Domination in Fuzzy Graphs Manuscript
M. Nikfar, “The Results on Vertex Domination in Fuzzy Graphs”, Preprints 2018, 2018040085
(doi: 10.20944/preprints201804.0085.v2).

10.20944/preprints201901.0024.v1).
2019 0003 | Nikfar Domination in Neutrosophic Graphs Manuscript
M. Nikfar, “Nikfar Domination in Neutrosophic Graphs”, Preprints 2019, 2019010025 (doi:

10.20944/preprints201901.0025.v1).
2018 0002 | Vertex Domination in t-Norm Fuzzy Graphs Manuscript
M. Nikfar, “Vertex Domination in t-Norm Fuzzy Graphs”, Preprints 2018, 2018040119 (doi:
10.20944/preprints201804.0119.v1).
2018 0001 | The Results on Vertex Domination in Fuzzy Graphs Manuscript
M. Nikfar, “The Results on Vertex Domination in Fuzzy Graphs”, Preprints 2018, 2018040085
(doi: 10.20944/preprints201804.0085.v1).
6804
Publications: Books
2023 - Amazon
“ 115th Book
|| Cancer in SuperHyperGraphs
Link (Paperback): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW3BK14G
(Hardcover): https://www.amazon.com/dp/- (Kindle Edition):
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW6JCNY1
ISBN (Paperback): 9798378064847 (Hardcover): 9798378- (Kindle Edition): CC BY-NC-ND
4.0
2023 115- Amazon
Cancer in SuperHyperGraphs
@googlebooks:https://books.google.com/books/about?id=ZdmuEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay:https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=ZdmuEAAAQBAJ
@WordPress:https://drhenrygarrett.wordpress.com/2023/02/19/Cancer-in-
SuperHyperGraphs/
@Scribd:https://www.scribd.com/document/-
@ZENODOO RG : https : //zenodo.org/record/7653233
@academia:https://www.academia.edu/97119655
2023 - Amazon
“ 114th Book
|| SuperHyperWheel
Link (Paperback): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW2BX6X1
(Hardcover): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW23H1M2 (Kindle Edition):
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW6H5TVG
ISBN (Paperback): 9798378062782 (Hardcover): 9798378063413 (Kindle Edition): CC BY-NC-
ND 4.0
2023 - Amazon
“ 114th
SuperHyperWheel
@googlebooks:https://books.google.com/books/about?id=S9muEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay:https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=S9muEAAAQBAJ
@WordPress:https://drhenrygarrett.wordpress.com/2023/02/19/SuperHyperWheel/
2023 - Amazon
“ 113rd Book
|| SuperHyperMultipartite
Link (Paperback): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW358WXN
(Hardcover): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW2CR178 (Kindle Edition):
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW6FTXNH
ND 4.0
2023 - Amazon
6805
“ 113rd”
SuperHyperMultipartite
@googlebooks:https://books.google.com/books/about?id=SdmuEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay:https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=SdmuEAAAQBAJ
@WordPress:https://drhenrygarrett.wordpress.com/2023/02/19/SuperHyperMultipartite/
2023 - Amazon
“ 112nd Book”
|| SuperHyperBipartite
Link (Paperback): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW267JRF
(Hardcover): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW2ZSL9D (Kindle Edition):
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW6G294W
ND 4.0
2023 - Amazon
“ 112nd”
SuperHyperBipartite
@googlebooks:https://books.google.com/books/about?id=s9iuEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay:https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=s9iuEAAAQBAJ
@WordPress:https://drhenrygarrett.wordpress.com/2023/02/19/SuperHyperBipartite/
2023 - Amazon
“ 111st Book”
|| SuperHyperStar
Link (Paperback): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW2XKM25
(Hardcover): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW2RKDDX (Kindle Edition):
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW6CTTXM
ND 4.0
2023 - Amazon
“ 111st”
SuperHyperStar
@googlebooks:https://books.google.com/books/about?id=8deuEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay:https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=8deuEAAAQBAJ
@WordPress:https://drhenrygarrett.wordpress.com/2023/02/19/SuperHyperStar/
2023 - Amazon
“ 110th Book”
|| SuperHyperCycle
Link (Paperback): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW2XKLRW
(Hardcover): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW2R9SSF (Kindle Edition):
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW5G2J68
ND 4.0
2023 - Amazon
6806
“ 110th”
SuperHyperCycle
@googlebooks:https://books.google.com/books/about?id=u8SuEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay:https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=u8SuEAAAQBAJ
@WordPress:https://drhenrygarrett.wordpress.com/2023/02/18/SuperHyperCycle/
2023 - Amazon
“ 109th Book”
|| SuperHyperPath
Link (Paperback): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW2B6DPZ
(Hardcover): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW2B6DP3 (Kindle Edition):
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW5D6T17
ND 4.0
2023 - Amazon
“ 109th”
SuperHyperPath
@googlebooks:https://books.google.com/books/about?id=t8SuEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay:https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=t8SuEAAAQBAJ
@WordPress:https://drhenrygarrett.wordpress.com/2023/02/18/SuperHyperPath/
2023 - Amazon
“ 108th Book”
|| SuperHyperDomination
Link (Paperback): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW2R9STC
(Hardcover): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW3BJZRF (Kindle Edition):
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW5FPZC8
ND 4.0
2023 - Amazon
“ 108th”
SuperHyperDomination
@googlebooks:https://books.google.com/books/about?id=scSuEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay:https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=scSuEAAAQBAJ
@WordPress:https://drhenrygarrett.wordpress.com/2023/02/18/SuperHyperDomination/
2023 - Amazon
“ 107th Book”
|| SuperHyperDominating
Link (Paperback): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW2K99NB (Hardcover):
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW2PWT1G (Kindle Edition):
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW4SFRXP
ISBN (Paperback): 9798377922339 (Hardcover): 9798377923053 (Kindle Edition): CC BY-
NC-ND 4.0
2023 - Amazon
6807
“ 107th”
SuperHyperDominating
@googlebooks:https://books.google.com/books/about?id=17uuEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay:https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=17uuEAAAQBAJ
@WordPress:https://drhenrygarrett.wordpress.com/2023/02/18/SuperHyperDominating/
2023 - Amazon
“ 106th Book”
|| SuperHyperConnected
Link (Paperback): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW2LMPN5
(Hardcover): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW358DDG (Kindle Edition):
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW2ZBHG7
ND 4.0
2023 - Amazon
“ 106th”
SuperHyperConnected
@googlebooks:https://books.google.com/books/about?id=AmquEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay:https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=AmquEAAAQBAJ
@WordPress:https://drhenrygarrett.wordpress.com/2023/02/17/SuperHyperConnected/
2023 - Amazon
“ 105th Book”
|| SuperHyperTotal
Link (Paperback): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW35VNQS
(Hardcover): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW2CQZJZ (Kindle Edition):
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BW1TZTPX
ND 4.0
2023 - Amazon
“ 105th”
SuperHyperTotal
@googlebooks:https://books.google.com/books/about?id=81uuEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay:https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=81uuEAAAQBAJ
@WordPress: https://drhenrygarrett.wordpress.com/2023/02/17/superhypertotal/
2023 - Amazon
6808
“ 104th Book”
|| SuperHyperPerfect
Link (Paperback): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BVSXB7TC
(Hardcover): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BVT8FRC2 (Kindle Edition):
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BVY6CGKZ
ND 4.0
2023 - Amazon
“ 104th”
SuperHyperPerfect
@googlebooks:https://books.google.com/books/about?id=JymuEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay:https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=JymuEAAAQBAJ
@WordPress: https://drhenrygarrett.wordpress.com/2023/02/16/SuperHyperPerfect/
2023 - Amazon
“ 103rd Book”
|| SuperHyperJoin
Link (Paperback): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BVT7HJ1K
(Hardcover): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BVSXX9W5 (Kindle Edition):
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BVY6P9KC
ND 4.0
2023 - Amazon
“ 103rd”
SuperHyperJoin
@googlebooks:https://books.google.com/books/about?id=TeStEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay:https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=TeStEAAAQBAJ
@WordPress: https://drhenrygarrett.wordpress.com/2023/02/15/superhyperjoin/
2023 - Amazon
“ 102nd Book”
|| SuperHyperDuality
Link (Paperback): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BVPMX6C4 (Hardcover):
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BVNTYX6M (Kindle Edition):
ND 4.0
2023 - Amazon
“ 102nd”
SuperHyperDuality
@googlebooks: https://books.google.com/books/about?id=jLCtEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay:https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=jLCtEAAAQBAJ
@WordPress:https://drhenrygarrett.wordpress.com/2023/02/14/superhyperduality
6809
2023 - Amazon
“ 101st Book”
|| Path SuperHyperColoring
Link (Paperback): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BVDRFXXF (Hardcover):
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BVDMJ5MJ (Kindle Edition):
ND 4.0
2023 - Amazon
“ 101st Book”
|| Path SuperHyperColoring
@googlebooks: https://books.google.com/books/about?id=o3ytEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=o3ytEAAAQBAJ
2023 - Amazon
“ 100th Book”
|| SuperHyperDensity
@googlebooks: https://books.google.com/books/about?id=HdusEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=HdusEAAAQBAJ
2023 - Amazon
“ 100th Book”
|| SuperHyperDensity
Link (Paperback): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BV49Y61R (Hardcover):
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BV4DYQZL (Kindle Edition):
ND 4.0
2023 - Amazon
Book 99 || “Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities”

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
@googlebooks:https://books.google.com/books/about?id=YeurEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay:https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=YeurEAAAQBAJ
2023 - Amazon
Book 99 || “Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities”
Link (Paperback): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BTXCX57J (Hardcover):

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BTRXKGTX (Kindle Edition):
ND 4.0
2023 - Amazon
6810
Book 98 || “Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities”
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
@googlebooks: https://books.google.com/books/about?id=X-urEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay:https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=X-urEAAAQBAJ
2023 - Amazon
Book 98 || “Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities”
Link (Paperback): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BTRYB2S4 (Hardcover):

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BTT6VT96 (Kindle Edition):
ND 4.0
2023 - Amazon
Book 97 || “SuperHyperConnectivities”
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
@googlebooks:https://books.google.com/books/about?id=UeurEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay:https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=UeurEAAAQBAJ
2023 - Amazon
Book 96 || “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
@googlebooks: https://books.google.com/books/about?id=OCeqEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=OCeqEAAAQBAJ
@WordPress: -
2023 - Amazon
Book 96 || “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”
Link (Paperback): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BT6ZXQ8V (Hardcover):

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BT7DZTBW (Kindle Edition):
ND 4.0
2023 - Amazon
Book 95 || “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
@googlebooks: https://books.google.com/books/about?id=MCeqEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=MCeqEAAAQBAJ
@WordPress: -
6811
2023 - Amazon
Book 95 || “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”
Link (Paperback): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BT7HS2CD (Hardcover):

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BT75DHQ2 (Kindle Edition):
ND 4.0
2023 - Amazon
Book 94 || “SuperHyperCycle”
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
@googlebooks: https://books.google.com/books/about?id=LieqEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=LieqEAAAQBAJ
@WordPress: -
2023 - Amazon
0092 | Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth
https://amazon.com/dp/B0BSV66BWV
https://amazon.com/dp/B0BSV7CZH4
9798374731323
9798374736922
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
@WordPress: -
@Scribd: -
2023 - Amazon
0091 | Extreme SuperHyperGirth

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BSJPZV9J
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BSJPYVWJ
9798374731309
9798374736915
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
@WordPress: -
@ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367351526E xtremeS uperHyperGirth
@Scribd: -
2023 - Amazon
0070 | SuperHyperGirth
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BSLKY69Q https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BT3S4ZP5
9798374731361 9798374736854 CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
@WordPress: -
2023 - Amazon
6812
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth”
@googlebooks: http://books.google.com/books/about?id=yL-qEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=yL-qEAAAQBAJ
2023 - Amazon
“Extreme SuperHyperGirth”
@googlebooks: http://books.google.com/books/about?id=vL-qEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=vL-qEAAAQBAJ
2023 - Amazon
“Overlook On SuperHyperGirth”
@googlebooks: http://books.google.com/books/about?id=rr-qEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=rr-qEAAAQBAJ
2023 - Amazon
“Book 90”
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BSJPZT7B https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BSR4XZH5
9798374564273 9798374564792 CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
@Scribd: -
@WordPress: -
2023 - Amazon
Book 80 Extreme SuperHyperMatching
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BSJDJSN7 https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BSLKWW3F
9798374564266 9798374564785 CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
@Scribd: -
@WordPress: -
2023 - Amazon
Book 69 SuperHyperMatching
@googlebooks: https://books.google.com/books/about?id=kC-oEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=kC-oEAAAQBAJ
@WordPress:https://drhenrygarrett.wordpress.com/2023/01/16/superhypermatching-
published-version/
2023 - Amazon
Book 69 SuperHyperMatching
Link (Paperback): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BSDPXX1P (Hardcover):

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BSDC1L66 (Kindle Edition):
ND 4.0
6813
2023 - Amazon
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching”
@googlebooks: http://books.google.com/books/about?id=6bmqEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=6bmqEAAAQBAJ
2023 - Amazon
“Extreme SuperHyperMatching”
@googlebooks: http://books.google.com/books/about?id=47mqEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=47mqEAAAQBAJ
2023 - Amazon
“Overlook On SuperHyperMatching”
@googlebooks: http://books.google.com/books/about?id=kC-oEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=kC-oEAAAQBAJ
2023 - Amazon
68 Failed SuperHyperClique
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BRZ67NYN https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BRYZTK24
9798373274227 9798373277273
@WordPress:https://drhenrygarrett.wordpress.com/2023/01/11/failed-superhyperclique-
published-version
2023 - Amazon
“Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique”
@googlebooks: http://books.google.com/books/about?id=h7qqEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=h7qqEAAAQBAJ
2023 - Amazon
“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique”
@googlebooks: http://books.google.com/books/about?id=gbqqEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=gbqqEAAAQBAJ
2023 - Amazon
“Overlook On Failed SuperHyperClique”
@googlebooks: http://books.google.com/books/about?id=e7qqEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=e7qqEAAAQBAJ
2023 - Amazon
6814
“Book 88: Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique”
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
@googlebooks: https://books.google.com/books/about?id=7f2pEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=7f2pEAAAQBAJ
@WordPress: -
2023 - Amazon
“Book 88: Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique”
Link (Paperback): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BT6RD41C (Hardcover):

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BT733BB2 (Kindle Edition):
ND 4.0
2023 - Amazon
“Book 78: Extreme SuperHyperClique”
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
@googlebooks: https://books.google.com/books/about?id=52 pEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=52 pEAAAQBAJ
@WordPress: -
2023 - Amazon
“Book 78: Extreme SuperHyperClique”
Link (Paperback): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BT6WSZLD (Hardcover):

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BT743MW2 (Kindle Edition): ISBN (Paperback):
9798375140049 (Hardcover): 9798375141510 (Kindle Edition): CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
2023 - Amazon
Book 67 SuperHyperClique
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BRWK4S1Y https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BRM24YJX
9798373040471 9798373041935
@ZENODOO RG : zenodo.org/record/7523357
@WordPress:https://drhenrygarrett.wordpress.com/2023/01/10/superhyperclique-published-
version-2/
2023 - Amazon
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique”
@googlebooks: http://books.google.com/books/about?id=7f2pEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=7f2pEAAAQBAJ
2023 - Amazon
“Extreme SuperHyperClique”
@googlebooks: http://books.google.com/books/about?id=52 pEAAAQBAJ

@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=52 pEAAAQBAJ
6815
2023 - Amazon
“Overlook On SuperHyperClique”
@googlebooks: http://books.google.com/books/about?id=Cf6pEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=Cf6pEAAAQBAJ
2023 - Amazon
66 Failed SuperHyperStable
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BRNG7DC8 https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BRLVN39L
9798372597976 9798372599765
@WordPress:https://drhenrygarrett.wordpress.com/2023/01/06/failed-superhyperstable-
published-version/
2023 - Amazon
“Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable”
@googlebooks: http://books.google.com/books/about?id=cLuqEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=cLuqEAAAQBAJ
2023 - Amazon
“Extreme Failed SuperHyperStable”
@googlebooks: http://books.google.com/books/about?id=aruqEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=aruqEAAAQBAJ
2023 - Amazon
“Overlook On Failed SuperHyperStable”
@googlebooks: http://books.google.com/books/about?id=YruqEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=YruqEAAAQBAJ
2023 - Amazon
Book 65 SuperHyperStable
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BRDG5Z4Y https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BRJPG56M
9798372248519 9798372252011
@WordPress:https://drhenrygarrett.wordpress.com/2023/01/03/superhyperstable-published-
version/
2023 - Amazon
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable”
@googlebooks: http://books.google.com/books/about?id=gLyqEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=gLyqEAAAQBAJ
2023 - Amazon
6816
“Extreme SuperHyperStable”
@googlebooks: http://books.google.com/books/about?id=CryqEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=CryqEAAAQBAJ
2023 - Amazon
“Overlook On SuperHyperStable”
@googlebooks: http://books.google.com/books/about?id=hLuqEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=hLuqEAAAQBAJ
2023 - Amazon
64 Failed SuperHyperForcing
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BRH5B4QM https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BRGX4DBJ
9798372123649 9798372124509
@WordPress:https://drhenrygarrett.wordpress.com/2023/01/01/failed-superhyperforcing-
published-version/
2023 - Amazon
“Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperForcing”
@googlebooks: http://books.google.com/books/about?id=yLyqEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=yLyqEAAAQBAJ
2023 - Amazon
“Extreme Failed SuperHyperForcing”
@googlebooks: http://books.google.com/books/about?id=wLyqEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=wLyqEAAAQBAJ
2023 - Amazon
“Failed SuperHyperForcing”
@googlebooks: http://books.google.com/books/about?id=vryqEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=vryqEAAAQBAJ
2023 - Amazon
63 | “SuperHyperForcing”
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BRDG1KN1 https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BRDFFQMF
9798371873347 9798371874092
@WordPress:https://drhenrygarrett.wordpress.com/2022/12/30/superhyperforcing-
published-versian/
2023 - Amazon
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing”
@googlebooks: http://books.google.com/books/about?id=5LyqEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=5LyqEAAAQBAJ
6817
2023 - Amazon
“Extreme SuperHyperForcing”
@googlebooks: http://books.google.com/books/about?id=3ryqEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=3ryqEAAAQBAJ
2023 - Amazon
“Overlook On SuperHyperForcing”
@googlebooks: http://books.google.com/books/about?id=zryqEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=zryqEAAAQBAJ
2023 - Amazon
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperAlliances”
@googlebooks: http://books.google.com/books/about?id=cr2qEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=cr2qEAAAQBAJ
2023 - Amazon
“Extreme SuperHyperAlliances”
@googlebooks: http://books.google.com/books/about?id=ZL2qEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=ZL2qEAAAQBAJ
2023 - Amazon
“Overlook On SuperHyperAlliances”
@googlebooks: http://books.google.com/books/about?id=Sr2qEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=Sr2qEAAAQBAJ
2023 - Amazon
62 |“SuperHyperAlliances”
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BR6YC3HG https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BR7CBTC6
9798371488343 9798371494849
@WordPress:https://drhenrygarrett.wordpress.com/2022/12/28/superhyperalliances-
published-version/
2023 - Amazon
Book 61 | “SuperHyperGraphs”
@googlebooks: http://books.google.com/books/about?id=iL2qEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=iL2qEAAAQBAJ
@WordPress:https://drhenrygarrett.wordpress.com/2022/12/24/superhypergraphs-published-
version/
2023 - Amazon
6818
Book 61 | “SuperHyperGraphs”
Link (Paperback): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BR1NHY4Z (Hardcover):

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BQXTHTXY (Kindle Edition):
ND 4.0
2023 - Amazon
60 | “Neut. SuperHyperEdges”
@googlebooks: http://books.google.com/books/about?id=rr2qEAAAQBAJ
@GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=rr2qEAAAQBAJ
@WordPress:https://drhenrygarrett.wordpress.com/2022/11/29/neut-superhyperedges-
published-version/
2023 - Amazon
Book 60 | “Neut. SuperHyperEdges”
Link (Paperback): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BNH11ZDY (Hardcover):

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BNGZGPP6
ND 4.0
2023 0069 | SuperHyperMatching Amazon
ASIN : B0BSDPXX1P Publisher : Independently published (January 15, 2023) Language

: English Paperback : 582 pages ISBN-13 : 979-8373872683 Item Weight : 3.6 pounds
Dimensions : 8.5 x 1.37 x 11 inches
ASIN : B0BSDC1L66 Publisher : Independently published (January 16, 2023) Language
: English Hardcover : 548 pages ISBN-13 : 979-8373875424 Item Weight : 3.3 pounds
2023 0068 | Failed SuperHyperClique Amazon
ASIN : B0BRZ67NYN Publisher : Independently published (January 10, 2023) Language

ASIN : B0BRYZTK24 Publisher : Independently published (January 10, 2023) Language
2023 0067 | SuperHyperClique Amazon
ASIN : B0BRWK4S1Y Publisher : Independently published (January 8, 2023) Language

ASIN : B0BRM24YJX Publisher : Independently published (January 8, 2023) Language :
English Hardcover : 388 pages ISBN-13 : 979-8373041935 Item Weight : 2.36 pounds Dimensions
: 8.25 x 1.1 x 11 inches
2023 0066 | Failed SuperHyperStable Amazon
ASIN : B0BRNG7DC8 Publisher : Independently published (January 4, 2023) Language

ASIN : B0BRLVN39L Publisher : Independently published (January 4, 2023) Language :
: 8.25 x 0.91 x 11 inches
6819
2023 0065 | SuperHyperStable Amazon
ASIN : B0BRDG5Z4Y Publisher : Independently published (January 2, 2023) Language

Dimensions : 8.27 x 0.7 x 11.69 inches
ASIN : B0BRJPG56M Publisher : Independently published (January 2, 2023) Language :
: 8.25 x 0.87 x 11 inches
2023 0064 | Failed SuperHyperForcing Amazon
ASIN : B0BRH5B4QM Publisher : Independently published (January 1, 2023) Language

ASIN : B0BRGX4DBJ Publisher : Independently published (January 1, 2023) Language :
: 8.25 x 0.98 x 11 inches
2022 0063 | SuperHyperForcing Amazon
ASIN : B0BRDG1KN1 Publisher : Independently published (December 30, 2022) Language

ASIN : B0BRDFFQMF Publisher : Independently published (December 30, 2022) Language
2022 0062 | SuperHyperAlliances Amazon
ASIN : B0BR6YC3HG Publisher : Independently published (December 27, 2022) Language

ASIN : B0BR7CBTC6 Publisher : Independently published (December 27, 2022) Language :
: 8.25 x 0.64 x 11 inches
2022 0061 | SuperHyperGraphs Amazon
ASIN : B0BR1NHY4Z Publisher : Independently published (December 24, 2022) Language :

English Paperback : 117 pages ISBN-13 : 979-8371090133 Item Weight : 13 ounces Dimensions
: 8.5 x 0.28 x 11 inches
ASIN : B0BQXTHTXY Publisher : Independently published (December 24, 2022) Language :
English Hardcover : 117 pages ISBN-13 : 979-8371093240 Item Weight : 12.6 ounces Dimensions
: 8.25 x 0.47 x 11 inches
2022 0060 | Neut. SuperHyperEdges Amazon
ASIN : B0BNH11ZDY Publisher : Independently published (November 27, 2022) Language :

: 8.5 x 0.26 x 11 inches
ASIN : B0BNGZGPP6 Publisher : Independently published (November 27, 2022) Language :
: 8.25 x 0.45 x 11 inches
2022 0059 | Neutrosophic k-Number Amazon
ASIN : B0BF3P5X4N Publisher : Independently published (September 14, 2022) Language

ASIN : B0BF2XCDZM Publisher : Independently published (September 14, 2022) Language :
: 8.25 x 0.57 x 11 inches
2022 0058 | Neutrosophic Schedule Amazon

6820
ASIN : B0BBJWJJZF Publisher : Independently published (August 22, 2022) Language

ASIN : B0BBJLPWKH Publisher : Independently published (August 22, 2022) Language :
: 8.25 x 1.35 x 11 inches
2022 0057 | Neutrosophic Wheel Amazon
ASIN : B0BBJRHXXG Publisher : Independently published (August 22, 2022) Language

ASIN : B0BBK3KG82 Publisher : Independently published (August 22, 2022) Language :
: 8.25 x 0.65 x 11 inches
2022 0056 | Neutrosophic t-partite Amazon
ASIN : B0BBJLZCHS Publisher : Independently published (August 22, 2022) Language

ASIN : B0BBJDFGJS Publisher : Independently published (August 22, 2022) Language :
: 8.25 x 0.75 x 11 inches
2022 0055 | Neutrosophic Bipartite Amazon
ASIN : B0BB5Z9GHW Publisher : Independently published (August 22, 2022) Language

ASIN : B0BBGG9RDZ Publisher : Independently published (August 22, 2022) Language :
: 8.25 x 0.72 x 11 inches
2022 0054 | Neutrosophic Star Amazon
ASIN : B0BB5ZHSSZ Publisher : Independently published (August 22, 2022) Language :

English Paperback : 215 pages ISBN-13 : 979-8847794374 Item Weight : 1.4 pounds Dimensions
: 8.5 x 0.51 x 11 inches
ASIN : B0BBC4BL9P Publisher : Independently published (August 22, 2022) Language :
: 8.25 x 0.7 x 11 inches
2022 0053 | Neutrosophic Cycle Amazon
ASIN : B0BB62NZQK Publisher : Independently published (August 22, 2022) Language

ASIN : B0BB65QMKQ Publisher : Independently published (August 22, 2022) Language :
: 8.25 x 1 x 11 inches
2022 0052 | Neutrosophic Path Amazon
ASIN : B0BB67WCXL Publisher : Independently published (August 8, 2022) Language :

English Paperback : 315 pages ISBN-13 : 979-8847730570 Item Weight : 2 pounds Dimensions
: 8.5 x 0.74 x 11 inches
ASIN : B0BB5Z9FXL Publisher : Independently published (August 8, 2022) Language :
: 8.25 x 0.93 x 11 inches
2022 0051 | Neutrosophic Complete Amazon

6821
ASIN : B0BB6191KN Publisher : Independently published (August 8, 2022) Language

ASIN : B0BB5RRQN7 Publisher : Independently published (August 8, 2022) Language :
: 8.25 x 0.73 x 11 inches
2022 0050 | Neutrosophic Dominating Amazon
ASIN : B0BB5QV8WT Publisher : Independently published (August 8, 2022) Language

ASIN : B0BB61WL9M Publisher : Independently published (August 8, 2022) Language :
: 8.25 x 1.03 x 11 inches
2022 0049 | Neutrosophic Resolving Amazon
ASIN : B0BBCJMRH8 Publisher : Independently published (August 8, 2022) Language

ASIN : B0BBCB6DFC Publisher : Independently published (August 8, 2022) Language :
: 8.25 x 1.06 x 11 inches
2022 0048 | Neutrosophic Stable Amazon
ASIN : B0B7QGTNFW Publisher : Independently published (July 28, 2022) Language :

English Paperback : 133 pages ISBN-13 : 979-8842880348 Item Weight : 14.6 ounces Dimensions
: 8.5 x 0.32 x 11 inches
ASIN : B0B7QJWQ35 Publisher : Independently published (July 28, 2022) Language :
: 8.25 x 0.51 x 11 inches
2022 0047 | Neutrosophic Total Amazon
ASIN : B0B7GLB23F Publisher : Independently published (July 25, 2022) Language : English
Paperback : 137 pages ISBN-13 : 979-8842357741 Item Weight : 14.9 ounces Dimensions : 8.5
x 0.33 x 11 inches
ASIN : B0B6XVTDYC Publisher : Independently published (July 25, 2022) Language :
: 8.25 x 0.52 x 11 inches
2022 0046 | Neutrosophic Perfect Amazon
ASIN : B0B7CJHCYZ Publisher : Independently published (July 22, 2022) Language :

: 8.5 x 0.3 x 11 inches
ASIN : B0B7C732Z1 Publisher : Independently published (July 22, 2022) Language : English
Hardcover : 127 pages ISBN-13 : 979-8842028757 Item Weight : 13.6 ounces Dimensions : 8.25
x 0.49 x 11 inches
2022 0045 | Neutrosophic Joint Set Amazon
ASIN : B0B6L8WJ77 Publisher : Independently published (July 15, 2022) Language : English
Paperback : 139 pages ISBN-13 : 979-8840802199 Item Weight : 15 ounces Dimensions : 8.5 x
0.33 x 11 inches
ASIN : B0B6L9GJWR Publisher : Independently published (July 15, 2022) Language :
: 8.25 x 0.52 x 11 inches
6822
August 30, 0044 | Neutrosophic Duality GLOBAL
2022 KNOWLEDGE -
Publishing
House&Amazon&Google
Scholar&UNM
Neutrosophic Duality, GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE - Publishing House:
GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE - Publishing House 848 Brickell Ave Ste 950 Miami, Florida 33131
United States. ISBN: 978-1-59973-743-0
Henry Garrett, (2022). “Neutrosophic Duality”, Florida: GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE - Publishing
House 848 Brickell Ave Ste 950 Miami, Florida 33131 United States. ISBN: 978-1-59973-743-0
(http://fs.unm.edu/NeutrosophicDuality.pdf).
ASIN : B0B4SJ8Y44 Publisher : Independently published (June 22, 2022) Language : English
Paperback : 115 pages ISBN-13 : 979-8837647598 Item Weight : 12.8 ounces Dimensions : 8.5
x 0.27 x 11 inches
ASIN : B0B46B4CXT Publisher : Independently published (June 22, 2022) Language : English
Hardcover : 115 pages ISBN-13 : 979-8837649981 Item Weight : 12.5 ounces Dimensions : 8.25
x 0.46 x 11 inches
GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE - Publishing House: http://fs.unm.edu/NeutrosophicDuality.pdf
UNM: http://fs.unm.edu/NeutrosophicDuality.pdf
Google Scholar: https://books.google.com/books?id=dWWkEAAAQBAJ
Paperback: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B4SJ8Y44
Hardcover: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B46B4CXT
2022 0043 | Neutrosophic Path-Coloring Amazon
ASIN : B0B3F2BZC4 Publisher : Independently published (June 7, 2022) Language : English

Paperback : 161 pages ISBN-13 : 979-8834894469 Item Weight : 1.08 pounds Dimensions : 8.5
x 0.38 x 11 inches
ASIN : B0B3FGPGQ3 Publisher : Independently published (June 7, 2022) Language :
: 8.25 x 0.57 x 11 inches
2022 0042 | Neutrosophic Density Amazon
ASIN : B0B19CDX7W Publisher : Independently published (May 15, 2022) Language :

: 8.5 x 0.35 x 11 inches
ASIN : B0B14PLPGL Publisher : Independently published (May 15, 2022) Language :
: 8.25 x 0.53 x 11 inches
2022 0041 | Properties of SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Google Commerce Ltd
Publisher Infinite Study Seller Google Commerce Ltd Published on Apr 27, 2022 Pages
30 Features Original pages Best for web, tablet, phone, eReader Language English Genres
Antiques & Collectibles / Reference Content protection This content is DRM free GooglePlay
Properties of SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Front Cover Henry
Garrett Infinite Study, 27 Apr 2022 - Antiques & Collectibles - 30 pages GoogleBooks
Henry Garrett, “Properties of SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”,
Neutrosophic Sets and Systems 49 (2022) 531-561 (doi: 893 10.5281/zenodo.6456413).
(http://fs.unm.edu/NSS/NeutrosophicSuperHyperGraph34.pdf).
2022 0040 | Neutrosophic Connectivity Amazon
ASIN : B09YQJG2ZV Publisher : Independently published (April 26, 2022) Language :

: 8.5 x 0.29 x 11 inches
ASIN : B09YQJG2DZ Publisher : Independently published (April 26, 2022) Language :
: 8.25 x 0.48 x 11 inches
2022 0039 | Neutrosophic Cycles Amazon

6823
ASIN : B09X4KVLQG Publisher : Independently published (April 8, 2022) Language

ASIN : B09X4LZ3HL Publisher : Independently published (April 8, 2022) Language : English
Hardcover : 169 pages ISBN-13 : 979-8449144157 Item Weight : 1.09 pounds Dimensions : 8.25
x 0.59 x 11 inches
2022 0038 | Girth in Neutrosophic Graphs Amazon
ASIN : B09WQ5PFV8 Publisher : Independently published (March 29, 2022) Language

ASIN : B09WQQGXPZ Publisher : Independently published (March 29, 2022) Language :
: 8.25 x 0.58 x 11 inches
2022 0037 | Matching Number in Neutrosophic Graphs Amazon
ASIN : B09W7FT8GM Publisher : Independently published (March 22, 2022) Language

ASIN : B09W4HF99L Publisher : Independently published (March 22, 2022) Language :
English Hardcover : 153 pages ISBN-13 : 979-8437539057 Item Weight : 1 pounds Dimensions
: 8.25 x 0.55 x 11 inches
2022 0036 | Clique Number in Neutrosophic Graph Amazon
ASIN : B09TV82Q7T Publisher : Independently published (March 7, 2022) Language

ASIN : B09TZBPWJG Publisher : Independently published (March 7, 2022) Language :
: 8.25 x 0.56 x 11 inches
2022 0035 | Independence in Neutrosophic Graphs Amazon
ASIN : B09TF227GG Publisher : Independently published (February 27, 2022) Language :

English Paperback : 149 pages ISBN-13 : 979-8424231681 Item Weight : 1 pounds Dimensions
: 8.5 x 0.35 x 11 inches
ASIN : B09TL1LSKD Publisher : Independently published (February 27, 2022) Language :
: 8.25 x 0.54 x 11 inches
2022 0034 | Zero Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs Amazon
ASIN : B09SW2YVKB Publisher : Independently published (February 18, 2022) Language :

: 8.5 x 0.35 x 11 inches
ASIN : B09SWLK7BG Publisher : Independently published (February 18, 2022) Language :
: 8.25 x 0.54 x 11 inches
2022 0033 | Neutrosophic Quasi-Order Amazon
ASIN : B09S3RXQ5C Publisher : Independently published (February 8, 2022) Language :

: 8.5 x 0.26 x 11 inches
ASIN : B09S232DQH Publisher : Independently published (February 8, 2022) Language :
: 8.25 x 0.43 x 11 inches
6824
Jan 29, 2022 0032 | Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs E-
publishing&Amazon&Google
Scholar&UNM
Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs, E-publishing:
Educational Publisher 1091 West 1st Ave Grandview Heights, Ohio 43212 United States
ISBN 978-1-59973-725-6
Henry Garrett, (2022). “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”, Ohio: E-publishing: Educational
Publisher 1091 West 1st Ave Grandview Heights, Ohio 43212 United States. ISBN: 978-1-
59973-725-6 (http://fs.unm.edu/BeyondNeutrosophicGraphs.pdf).
ASIN : B0BBCQJQG5 Publisher : Independently published (August 8, 2022) Language
ASIN : B0BBC4BJZ5 Publisher : Independently published (August 8, 2022) Language : English
Hardcover : 257 pages ISBN-13 : 979-8847567497 Item Weight : 1.61 pounds Dimensions : 8.25
x 0.8 x 11 inches
E-publishing: Educational Publisher: http://fs.unm.edu/BeyondNeutrosophicGraphs.pdf
UNM: http://fs.unm.edu/BeyondNeutrosophicGraphs.pdf
Google Scholar:https://books.google.com/books?id=cWWkEAAAQBAJ
Paperback: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0BBCQJQG5
Hardcover: https://www.amazon.com/Beyond-Neutrosophic-Graphs-Henry-
Garrett/dp/B0BBC4BJZ5
2022 0031 | Neutrosophic Alliances Amazon
ASIN : B09RB5XLVB Publisher : Independently published (January 26, 2022) Language :

: 8.5 x 0.21 x 11 inches
ASIN : B09R39MTSW Publisher : Independently published (January 26, 2022) Language :

: 8.25 x 0.4 x 11 inches
2022 0030 | Neutrosophic Hypergraphs Amazon
ASIN : B09PMBKVD4 Publisher : Independently published (January 7, 2022) Language :

: 8.5 x 0.19 x 11 inches
ASIN : B09PP8VZ3D Publisher : Independently published (January 7, 2022) Language :
: 8.25 x 0.38 x 11 inches
2022 0029 | Collections of Articles Amazon
-
ASIN : B09PHHDDQK Publisher : Independently published (January 2, 2022) Language :
: 8.25 x 1.47 x 11 inches
2022 0028 | Collections of Math Amazon
-
ASIN : B09PHBWT5D Publisher : Independently published (January 1, 2022) Language :
: 8.25 x 1.28 x 11 inches
2022 0027 | Collections of US Amazon
-
ASIN : B09PHBT924 Publisher : Independently published (December 31, 2021) Language :
: 8.25 x 0.81 x 11 inches
2021 0026 | Neutrosophic Chromatic Number Amazon

6825
ASIN : B09NRD25MG Publisher : Independently published (December 20, 2021) Language

: English Paperback : 67 pages ISBN-13 : 979-8787858174 Item Weight : 8.2 ounces Dimensions
: 8.5 x 0.16 x 11 inches Language : English
-
2021 0025 | Simple Ideas Amazon
ASIN : B09MYTN6NT Publisher : Independently published (December 9, 2021) Language :

: 8.5 x 0.11 x 11 inches
-
2021 0024 | Neutrosophic Graphs Amazon
ASIN : B09MYXVNF9 Publisher : Independently published (December 7, 2021) Language

: English Paperback : 55 pages ISBN-13 : 979-8780775652 Item Weight : 7 ounces Dimensions
: 8.5 x 0.13 x 11 inches
-
2021 0023 | List Amazon
ASIN : B09M554XCL Publisher : Independently published (November 20, 2021) Language :

: 8.5 x 0.12 x 11 inches
-
2021 0022 | Theorems Amazon
ASIN : B09KDZXGPR Publisher : Independently published (October 28, 2021) Language :

: 8.5 x 0.12 x 11 inches
-
2021 0021 | Dimension Amazon
ASIN : B09K2BBQG7 Publisher : Independently published (October 25, 2021) Language :

English Paperback : 55 pages ISBN-13 : 979-8753577146 Item Weight : 7 ounces Dimensions :
8.5 x 0.13 x 11 inches
-
2021 0020 | Beyond The Graph Theory Amazon
ASIN : B09KDZXGPR Publisher : Independently published (October 28, 2021) Language :

: 8.5 x 0.12 x 11 inches
-
2021 0019 | Located Heart And Memories Amazon
ASIN : B09F14PL8T Publisher : Independently published (August 31, 2021) Language :

8.5 x 0.14 x 11 inches
-
2021 0018 | Number Graphs And Numbers Amazon
ASIN : B099BQRSF8 Publisher : Independently published (July 14, 2021) Language : English
Paperback : 32 pages ISBN-13 : 979-8537474135 Item Weight : 4.8 ounces Dimensions : 8.5 x
0.08 x 11 inches
-
2021 0017 | First Place Is Reserved Amazon

6826
ASIN : B098CWD5PT Publisher : Independently published (June 30, 2021) Language :

8.5 x 0.13 x 11 inches
-
2021 0016 | Detail-oriented Groups And Ideas Amazon
ASIN : B098CYYG3Q Publisher : Independently published (June 30, 2021) Language :

: 8.5 x 0.17 x 11 inches
-
2021 0015 | Definition And Its Necessities Amazon
ASIN : B098DHRJFD Publisher : Independently published (June 30, 2021) Language :

: 8.5 x 0.19 x 11 inches
-
2021 0014 | Words And Their Directionss Amazon
ASIN : B098CYS8G2 Publisher : Independently published (June 30, 2021) Language :

8.5 x 0.16 x 11 inches
-
2021 0013 | Tattooed Heart But Forever Amazon
ASIN : B098CR8HM6 Publisher : Independently published (June 30, 2021) Language :

: 8.5 x 0.11 x 11 inches
-
2021 0012 | Metric Number In Dimension Amazon
ASIN : B0913597TV Publication date : March 24, 2021 Language : English File size : 28445
KB Text-to-Speech : Enabled Enhanced typesetting : Enabled X-Ray : Not Enabled Word
Wise : Not Enabled Print length : 48 pages Lending : Not Enabled Kindle
-
2021 0011 | Domination Theory And Beyond Amazon
ASIN : B098DMMZ87 Publisher : Independently published (June 30, 2021) Language

-
2021 0010 | Vital Glory Amazon
ASIN : B08PVNJYRM Publication date : December 6, 2020 Language : English File size
: 1544 KB Simultaneous device usage : Unlimited Text-to-Speech : Enabled Screen Reader :
Supported Enhanced typesetting : Enabled X-Ray : Not Enabled Word Wise : Enabled Print
length : 24 pages Lending : Enabled Kindle
-
2021 0009 | Análisis de modelos y orientación más allá AmazonUK&MoreBooks

6827
Análisis de modelos y orientación más allá Planteamiento y problemas en dos modelos
Ediciones Nuestro Conocimiento (2021-04-06) eligible for voucher ISBN-13: 978-620-3-59902-
2 ISBN-10:6203599026EAN:9786203599022Book language:Blurb/Shorttext:El enfoque para la
resolución de problemas es una selección obvia para hacer la investigación y el análisis de la
situación que puede provocar las perspectivas vagas que queremos no ser para extraer ideas
creativas y nuevas que queremos ser. Estudio simultáneamente dos modelos. Este estudio se
basa tanto en la investigación como en la discusión que el autor piensa que puede ser útil
para entender y hacer crecer nuestra fantası́a y la realidad juntas.Publishing house: Ediciones
Nuestro Conocimiento Website: https://sciencia-scripts.com By (author) : Henry Garrett
Number of pages:64Published on:2021-04-06Stock:Available Category: Mathematics Price:39.90
Keywords:Dos modelos, optimización de rutas y transporte, Two Models, Optimizing Routes
and Transportation
MoreBooks
https://www.morebooks.shop/store/gb/book/análisis-de-modelos-y-orientación-más-
allá/isbn/978-620-3-59902-2
Product details Publisher : Ediciones Nuestro Conocimiento (6 April 2021) Language :
Spanish ISBN-10 : 6203599026 ISBN-13 : 978-6203599022 Dimensions : 15 x 0.4 x 22 cm
Paperback:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Análisis-modelos-orientación-allá-Planteamiento/dp/6203599026
2021 0008 | Анализ моделей и руководство за пределами Amazon&MoreBooks
Анализ моделей и руководство за пределами Подход и проблемы в двух моде-

лях Sciencia Scripts (2021-04-06) eligible for voucher ISBN-13: 978-620-3-59908-4 ISBN-
10:6203599085EAN:9786203599084Book language: Russian Blurb/Shorttext:Подход к реше-
нию проблем является очевидным выбором для проведения исследований и анализа си-
туации, которая может вызвать смутные перспективы, которыми мы не хотим быть для
извлечения творческих и новых идей, которыми мы хотим быть. Я одновременно изучаю
две модели. Это исследование основано как на исследовании, так и на обсуждении, кото-
рое, по мнению автора, может быть полезным для понимания и развития наших фантазий
и реальности вместе.Publishing house: Sciencia Scripts Website: https://sciencia-scripts.com
By (author) : Генри Гарретт Number of pages:68Published on:2021-04-06Stock:Available
Category: Mathematics Price:39.90 Keywords:Две модели, оптимизация маршрутов и
транспорта, Two Models, Optimizing Routes and Transportation
MoreBooks
https://www.morebooks.shop/store/gb/book/анализ-моделей-и-руководство-за-
пределами/isbn/978-620-3-59908-4
Анализ моделей и руководство за пределами: Подход и проблемы в двух моделях

(Russian Edition) Publisher : Sciencia Scripts (April 6, 2021) Language : Russian Paperback :
68 pages ISBN-10 : 6203599085 ISBN-13 : 978-6203599084 Item Weight : 5.3 ounces Dimensions
: 5.91 x 0.16 x 8.66 inches
2021 0007 | Análise e Orientação de Modelos Além Amazon | MoreBooks |

Walmart
6828
Análise e Orientação de Modelos Além Abordagem e Problemas em Dois Modelos Edições
Nosso Conhecimento (2021-04-06 ) eligible for voucher ISBN-13: 978-620-3-59907-7 ISBN-
10:6203599077EAN:9786203599077Book language:Blurb/Shorttext:A abordagem para resolver
problemas é uma seleção óbvia para fazer pesquisa e análise da situação, que pode trazer
as perspectivas vagas que queremos não ser para extrair idéias criativas e novas idéias que
queremos ser. Eu estudo simultaneamente dois modelos. Este estudo é baseado tanto na
pesquisa como na discussão que o autor pensa que pode ser útil para compreender e fazer crescer
juntos a nossa fantasia e realidade.Publishing house: Edições Nosso Conhecimento Website:
https://sciencia-scripts.com By (author) : Henry Garrett Number of pages:64Published
on:2021-04-06Stock:Available Category: Mathematics Price:39.90 Keywords:Dois Modelos,
Otimização de Rotas e Transporte, Two Models, Optimizing Routes and Transportation
MoreBooks:
https://www.morebooks.shop/store/gb/book/análise-e-orientação-de-modelos-
além/isbn/978-620-3-59907-7
Henry Garrett Análise e Orientação de Modelos Além (Paperback) About this item
Product details
A abordagem para resolver problemas é uma seleção óbvia para fazer pesquisa e análise da
situação, que pode trazer as perspectivas vagas que queremos não ser para extrair idéias
criativas e novas idéias que queremos ser. Eu estudo simultaneamente dois modelos. Este
estudo é baseado tanto na pesquisa como na discussão que o autor pensa que pode ser útil
para compreender e fazer crescer juntos a nossa fantasia e realidade. Análise e Orientação de
Modelos Além (Paperback) We aim to show you accurate product information. Manufacturers,
suppliers and others provide what you see here, and we have not verified it. See our disclaimer
Specifications
Language Portuguese Publisher KS Omniscriptum Publishing Book Format Paperback Number
of Pages 64 Author Henry Garrett Title Análise e Orientação de Modelos Além ISBN-13
9786203599077 Publication Date April, 2021 Assembled Product Dimensions (L x W x H) 9.00
x 6.00 x 1.50 Inches ISBN-10 6203599077 Walmart
Análise e Orientação de Modelos Além: Abordagem e Problemas em Dois Modelos

(Portuguese Edition) Publisher : Edições Nosso Conhecimento (April 6, 2021) Language :
Portuguese Paperback : 64 pages ISBN-10 : 6203599077 ISBN-13 : 978-6203599077 Item Weight
: 3.67 ounces Dimensions : 5.91 x 0.15 x 8.66 inches
2021 0006 | Analizy modelowe i wytyczne wykraczaja˛ce poza Amazon&MoreBooks
Analizy modelowe i wytyczne wykraczaja˛ce poza Podejście i problemy w dwóch

modelach Wydawnictwo Nasza Wiedza (2021-04-06 ) eligible for voucher ISBN-13: 978-620-3-
59906-0 ISBN-10:6203599069EAN:9786203599060Book language:Blurb/Shorttext:Podejście do
rozwia˛zywania problemów jest oczywistym wyborem do prowadzenia badań i analizowania
sytuacji, które moga˛ wywo lywać niejasne perspektywy, których nie chcemy dla wydobycia
kreatywnych i nowych pomys lów, które chcemy. I jednocześnie studiować dwa modele.
Badanie to oparte jest zarówno na badaniach jak i dyskusji, które zdaniem autora moga˛
być przydatne do zrozumienia i rozwoju naszych fantazji i rzeczywistości razem.Publishing
house: Wydawnictwo Nasza Wiedza Website: https://sciencia-scripts.com By (author) : Henry
Garrett Number of pages:64Published on:2021-04-06Stock:Available Category: Mathematics
Price:39.90 Keywords:Dwa modele, optymalizacja tras i transportu, Two Models, Optimizing
Routes and Transportation
MoreBooks:
https://www.morebooks.shop/store/gb/book/analizy-modelowe-i-wytyczne-wykraczaja˛ce-
poza/isbn/978-620-3-59906-0
Analizy modelowe i wytyczne wykraczaja˛ce poza: Podejście i problemy w dwóch modelach
(Polish Edition) Publisher : Wydawnictwo Nasza Wiedza (April 6, 2021) Language : Polish
Paperback : 64 pages ISBN-10 : 6203599069 ISBN-13 : 978-6203599060 Item Weight : 3.67
ounces Dimensions : 5.91 x 0.15 x 8.66 inches
2021 0005 | Modelanalyses en begeleiding daarna Amazon&MoreBooks

6829
Modelanalyses en begeleiding daarna Aanpak en problemen in twee modellen
Uitgeverij Onze Kennis (2021-04-06 ) eligible for voucher ISBN-13: 978-620-3-59905-3
ISBN-10:6203599050EAN:9786203599053Book language:Blurb/Shorttext:De aanpak voor het
oplossen van problemen is een voor de hand liggende keuze voor het doen van onderzoek en het
analyseren van de situatie die de vage perspectieven kan oproepen die we niet willen zijn voor
het extraheren van creatieve en nieuwe ideeën die we willen zijn. Ik bestudeer tegelijkertijd twee
modellen. Deze studie is gebaseerd op zowel onderzoek als discussie waarvan de auteur denkt dat
ze nuttig kunnen zijn voor het begrijpen en laten groeien van onze fantasieën en de werkelijkheid
samen.Publishing house: Uitgeverij Onze Kennis Website: https://sciencia-scripts.com By
(author) : Henry Garrett Number of pages:64Published on:2021-04-06Stock:Available Category:
Mathematics Price:39.90 Keywords:Twee modellen, optimalisering van routes en transport,
Two Models, Optimizing Routes and Transportation
MoreBooks
Modelanalyses en begeleiding daarna: Aanpak en problemen in twee modellen (Dutch
Edition) Publisher : Uitgeverij Onze Kennis (April 6, 2021) Language : Dutch Paperback : 64
pages ISBN-10 : 6203599050 ISBN-13 : 978-6203599053 Item Weight : 3.99 ounces Dimensions
: 5.91 x 0.15 x 8.66 inches
2021 0004 | Analisi dei modelli e guida oltre Amazon | MoreBooks |

Walmart
Analisi dei modelli e guida oltre Approccio e problemi in due modelli Edizioni
Sapienza (2021-04-06 ) eligible for voucher ISBN-13: 978-620-3-59904-6 ISBN-
10:6203599042EAN:9786203599046Book language:Blurb/Shorttext:L’approccio per risolvere
i problemi è una selezione ovvia per fare ricerca e analisi della situazione che può suscitare
le prospettive vaghe che non vogliamo essere per estrarre idee creative e nuove che vogliamo
essere. Studio contemporaneamente due modelli. Questo studio si basa sia sulla ricerca che
sulla discussione che l’autore pensa possa essere utile per capire e far crescere insieme la nostra
fantasia e la realtà.Publishing house: Edizioni Sapienza Website: https://sciencia-scripts.com
By (author) : Henry Garrett Number of pages:60Published on:2021-04-06Stock:Available
Category: Mathematics Price:39.90 Keywords:Due modelli, ottimizzazione dei percorsi e del
trasporto, Two Models, Optimizing Routes and Transportation
MoreBooks Henry Garrett Analisi dei modelli e guida oltre (Paperback) About this item
Product details
L’approccio per risolvere i problemi è una selezione ovvia per fare ricerca e analisi della
situazione che può suscitare le prospettive vaghe che non vogliamo essere per estrarre idee
creative e nuove che vogliamo essere. Studio contemporaneamente due modelli. Questo studio
si basa sia sulla ricerca che sulla discussione che l’autore pensa possa essere utile per capire e far
crescere insieme la nostra fantasia e la realtà. Analisi dei modelli e guida oltre (Paperback) We
aim to show you accurate product information. Manufacturers, suppliers and others provide
what you see here, and we have not verified it. See our disclaimer Specifications
Publisher KS Omniscriptum Publishing Book Format Paperback Number of Pages 60 Author
Henry Garrett Title Analisi dei modelli e guida oltre ISBN-13 9786203599046 Publication Date
April, 2021 Assembled Product Dimensions (L x W x H) 9.00 x 6.00 x 1.50 Inches ISBN-10
6203599042 Walmart
Analisi dei modelli e guida oltre: Approccio e problemi in due modelli (Italian Edition)
Publisher : Edizioni Sapienza (April 6, 2021) Language : Italian Paperback : 60 pages ISBN-10
: 6203599042 ISBN-13 : 978-6203599046 Item Weight : 3.53 ounces Dimensions : 5.91 x 0.14 x
8.66 inches
2021 0003 | Analyses de modèles et orientations au-delà Amazon | MoreBooks |

Walmart
6830
Analyses de modèles et orientations au-delà Approche et problèmes dans deux
modèles Editions Notre Savoir (2021-04-06 ) eligible for voucher eligible for voucher
ISBN-13: 978-620-3-59903-9 ISBN-10:6203599034EAN:9786203599039Book language: French
Blurb/Shorttext:L’approche pour résoudre les problèmes est une sélection évidente pour faire
la recherche et l’analyse de la situation qui peut éliciter les perspectives vagues que nous ne
voulons pas être pour extraire des idées créatives et nouvelles que nous voulons être. J’étudie
simultanément deux modèles. Cette étude est basée à la fois sur la recherche et la discussion,
ce qui, selon l’auteur, peut être utile pour comprendre et développer nos fantasmes et la réalité
ensemble.Publishing house: Editions Notre Savoir Website: https://sciencia-scripts.com By
(author) : Henry Garrett Number of pages:64Published on:2021-04-06Stock:Available Category:
Mathematics Price:39.90 Keywords:Two Models, Optimizing Routes and Transportation, Deux
modèles, optimisation des itinéraires et des transports
MoreBooks:
https://www.morebooks.shop/store/gb/book/analyses-de-modèles-et-orientations-au-
delà/isbn/978-620-3-59903-9
Henry Garrett Analyses de modèles et orientations au-delà (Paperback) About this item
Product details
L’approche pour résoudre les problèmes est une sélection évidente pour faire la recherche et
l’analyse de la situation qui peut éliciter les perspectives vagues que nous ne voulons pas être
pour extraire des idées créatives et nouvelles que nous voulons être. J’étudie simultanément
deux modèles. Cette étude est basée à la fois sur la recherche et la discussion, ce qui, selon
l’auteur, peut être utile pour comprendre et développer nos fantasmes et la réalité ensemble.
Analyses de modèles et orientations au-delà (Paperback) We aim to show you accurate product
information. Manufacturers, suppliers and others provide what you see here, and we have not
verified it. See our disclaimer Specifications
Language French Publisher KS Omniscriptum Publishing Book Format Paperback Number of
Pages 64 Author Henry Garrett Title Analyses de modèles et orientations au-delà ISBN-13
9786203599039 Publication Date April, 2021 Assembled Product Dimensions (L x W x H) 9.00
x 6.00 x 1.50 Inches ISBN-10 6203599034 Walmart
Analyses de modèles et orientations au-delà: Approche et problèmes dans deux modèles

(French Edition) Publisher : Editions Notre Savoir (April 6, 2021) Language : French Paperback
: 64 pages ISBN-10 : 6203599034 ISBN-13 : 978-6203599039 Item Weight : 3.67 ounces
Dimensions : 5.91 x 0.15 x 8.66 inches
2021 0002 | Modell-Analysen und Anleitungen darüber hinaus Amazon | MoreBooks |

Walmart | eBay
6831
eligible for voucher ISBN-13: 978-620-3-59901-5 ISBN-
10:6203599018EAN:9786203599015Book language: German Blurb/Shorttext:Die
Herangehensweise zur Lösung von Problemen ist eine offensichtliche Auswahl für die
Forschung und Analyse der Situation, die die vagen Perspektiven, die wir nicht sein wollen,
für die Extraktion von kreativen und neuen Ideen, die wir sein wollen, hervorbringen kann.
Ich studiere gleichzeitig zwei Modelle. Diese Studie basiert sowohl auf der Forschung als
auch auf der Diskussion, von der der Autor denkt, dass sie für das Verständnis und das
Zusammenwachsen unserer Fantasie und Realität nützlich sein kann.Publishing house: Verlag
Unser Wissen Website: https://sciencia-scripts.com By (author) : Henry Garrett Number
of pages:68Published on:2021-04-06Stock:Available Category: Mathematics Price:39.90
Keywords:Zwei Modelle, Optimierung von Routen und Transport, Two Models, Optimizing
Routes and Transportation
MoreBooksHenry Garrett Modell-Analysen und Anleitungen darüber hinaus (Paperback)
About this item
Product details
Die Herangehensweise zur Lösung von Problemen ist eine offensichtliche Auswahl für die
Forschung und Analyse der Situation, die die vagen Perspektiven, die wir nicht sein wollen,
für die Extraktion von kreativen und neuen Ideen, die wir sein wollen, hervorbringen kann.
Ich studiere gleichzeitig zwei Modelle. Diese Studie basiert sowohl auf der Forschung als
auch auf der Diskussion, von der der Autor denkt, dass sie für das Verständnis und das
Zusammenwachsen unserer Fantasie und Realität nützlich sein kann. Modell-Analysen und
Anleitungen darüber hinaus (Paperback) We aim to show you accurate product information.
Manufacturers, suppliers and others provide what you see here, and we have not verified it.
See our disclaimer Specifications
Language German Publisher KS Omniscriptum Publishing Book Format Paperback Number
of Pages 68 Author Henry Garrett Title Modell-Analysen und Anleitungen darüber hinaus
ISBN-13 9786203599015 Publication Date April, 2021 Assembled Product Dimensions (L x W
x H) 9.00 x 6.00 x 1.50 Inches ISBN-10 6203599018
Walmart
Seller assumes all responsibility for this listing. Item specifics Condition: New: A new, unread,
unused book in perfect condition with no missing or damaged pages. See the ... Read
moreabout the condition ISBN: 9786203599015 EAN: 9786203599015 Publication Year: 2021
Type: Textbook Format: Paperback Language: German Publication Name: Modell-Analysen
Und Anleitungen Daruber Hinaus Item Height: 229mm Author: Henry Garrett Publisher:
Verlag Unser Wissen Item Width: 152mm Subject: Mathematics Item Weight: 113g Number of
Pages: 68 Pages About this product Product Information Die Herangehensweise zur Loesung
von Problemen ist eine offensichtliche Auswahl fur die Forschung und Analyse der Situation, die
die vagen Perspektiven, die wir nicht sein wollen, fur die Extraktion von kreativen und neuen
Ideen, die wir sein wollen, hervorbringen kann. Ich studiere gleichzeitig zwei Modelle. Diese
Studie basiert sowohl auf der Forschung als auch auf der Diskussion, von der der Autor denkt,
dass sie fur das Verstandnis und das Zusammenwachsen unserer Fantasie und Realitat nutzlich
sein kann. Product Identifiers Publisher Verlag Unser Wissen ISBN-13 9786203599015 eBay
Product ID (ePID) 11049032082 Product Key Features Publication Name Modell-Analysen
Und Anleitungen Daruber Hinaus Format Paperback Language German Subject Mathematics
Publication Year 2021 Type Textbook Author Henry Garrett Number of Pages 68 Pages
Dimensions Item Height 229mm Item Width 152mm Item Weight 113g Additional Product
Features Title
A uthorHenryGarrett
eBay
Modell-Analysen und Anleitungen darüber hinaus: Ansatz und Probleme in zwei Modellen
(German Edition) Publisher : Verlag Unser Wissen (April 6, 2021) Language : German
Paperback : 68 pages ISBN-10 : 6203599018 ISBN-13 : 978-6203599015 Item Weight : 3.99
ounces Dimensions : 5.91 x 0.16 x 8.66 inches Paperback
2021 0001 | Model Analyses and Guidance Beyond Amazon&MoreBooks

6832
Model Analyses and Guidance Beyond Approach and Problems in Two Models LAP
LAMBERT Academic Publishing (2020-12-02 ) eligible for voucher ISBN-13: 978-620-3-19506-
4 ISBN-10:6203195065EAN:9786203195064Book language: English Blurb/Shorttext:Approach
for solving problems is an obvious selection for doing research and analysis the situation
which may elicit the vague perspectives which we want not to be for extracting creative
and new ideas which we want to be. I simultaneously study two models. This study is based
both research and discussion which the author thinks that may be useful for understanding
and growing our fantasizing and reality together.Publishing house: LAP LAMBERT
Academic Publishing Website: https://www.lap-publishing.com/ By (author) : Henry Garrett
Number of pages:52Published on:2020-12-02Stock:Available Category: Mathematics Price:39.90
Keywords:Two Models, Optimizing Routes and Transportation
MoreBooks
Model Analyses and Guidance Beyond: Approach and Problems in Two Models Publisher :
LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing (December 2, 2020) Language : English Paperback : 52
pages ISBN-10 : 6203195065 ISBN-13 : 978-6203195064 Item Weight : 3.39 ounces Dimensions
: 5.91 x 0.12 x 8.66 inches
6833
Participating in Seminars
I’ve participated in all virtual conferences which are listed below [Some of them without selective process].
–https://web.math.princeton.edu/ pds/onlinetalks/talks.html
...
Also, I’ve participated in following events [Some of them without selective process]:
-The Hidden NORMS seminar

-Talk Math With Your Friends (TMWYF)
-MATHEMATICS COLLOQUIUM: https://www.csulb.edu/mathematics-statistics/mathematics-colloquium
-Lathisms: Cafe Con Leche
-Big Math network
...
I’m in mailing list in following [Some of them without selective process] organizations:
-[Algebraic-graph-theory] AGT Seminar (lists-uwaterloo-ca)

-Combinatorics Lectures Online (https://web.math.princeton.edu/ pds/onlinetalks/talks.html)
-Women in Combinatorics
-CMSA-Seminar (unsw-au)
-OURFA2M2 Online Undergraduate Resource Fair for the Advancement and Alliance of Marginalized Mathematicians
...
6834
Social Accounts
I’ve listed my accounts below.
-My website [Covering all my contributions containing articles and books as free access to download with PDF
extension and more]: https://drhenrygarrett.wordpress.com
-Amazon [Some of my all books, here]: https://www.amzn.com/author/drhenrygarrett
-Twitter: @DrHenryGarrett (www.twitter.com/DrHenryGarrett)
– ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Henry-Garrett-2
-Academia: https://independent.academia.edu/drhenrygarrett/
-Scribd: https://www.scribd.com/user/596815491/Henry-Garrett
-Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=enuser=SUjFCmcAAAAJview_op=list_workssortby=pubdate
-LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/drhenrygarrett/
6835
References
2017-2022 Dr. Henry Garrett WEBSITE
Department of Mathematics, Independent Researcher, Manhattan, NY, USA.

E-mail address: DrHenryGarrett @gmail.com
2017-2022 Dr. Henry Garrett WEBSITE
Department of Mathematics, Independent Researcher, Manhattan, NY, USA.

E-mail address: HenryGarrettNY @gmail.com
DrHenryGarrett.wordpress.com · Twitter.com/DrHenryGarrett
6836

0116 - Dimension in SuperHyperGraphs

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

0116 - Dimension in SuperHyperGraphs

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Dimension In

Dr. Henry Garrett

4 Cancer In Extreme SuperHyperGraph 27

6 New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of SuperHyperDi-

8 Applied Notions Under The Scrutiny Of The Motivation Of This Scientific

9 Extreme Preliminaries Of This Scientific Research On the Redeemed Ways 45

10 Extreme SuperHyperDimension But As The Extensions Excerpt From

11 The Extreme Departures on The Theoretical Results Toward Theoretical

12 The Surveys of Mathematical Sets On The Results But As The Initial

13 Extreme Applications in Cancer’s Extreme Recognition 95

14 Case 1: The Initial Extreme Steps Toward Extreme SuperHyperBipartite

15 Case 2: The Increasing Extreme Steps Toward Extreme SuperHyperMul-

16 Wondering Open Problems But As The Directions To Forming The

17 Conclusion and Closing Remarks 103

18 ExtremeSuperHyperDuality But As The Extensions Excerpt From Dense

19 ExtremeSuperHyperJoin But As The Extensions Excerpt From Dense

20 ExtremeSuperHyperPerfect But As The Extensions Excerpt From Dense

21 ExtremeSuperHyperTotal But As The Extensions Excerpt From Dense

22 ExtremeSuperHyperConnected But As The Extensions Excerpt From

24 Cancer In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 189

25 Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension 193

26 New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph

28 Applied Notions Under The Scrutiny Of The Motivation Of This Scientific

29 Neutrosophic Preliminaries Of This Scientific Research On the Redeemed

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

30 Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension But As The Extensions Excerpt

31 The Neutrosophic Departures on The Theoretical Results Toward Theor-

32 The Surveys of Mathematical Sets On The Results But As The Initial

33 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 257

34 Case 1: The Initial Neutrosophic Steps Toward Neutrosophic SuperHy-

35 Case 2: The Increasing Neutrosophic Steps Toward Neutrosophic Super-

36 Wondering Open Problems But As The Directions To Forming The

37 Conclusion and Closing Remarks 265

38 Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality But As The Extensions Excerpt From

39 Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin But As The Extensions Excerpt From

40 Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect But As The Extensions Excerpt From

41 Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal But As The Extensions Excerpt From

42 Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected But As The Extensions Excerpt

44 Books’ Contributions 351

45 “SuperHyperGraph-Based Books”: | Featured Tweets 361

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

10.1 The Extreme SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Extreme Notions of Extreme

10.17The Extreme SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Extreme Notions of Extreme

11.1 a Extreme SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of Extreme SuperHyperDi-

14.1 a Extreme SuperHyperBipartite Associated to the Notions of Extreme SuperHyper-

15.1 a Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of Extreme SuperHy-

30.1 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

30.8 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

31.1 a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of Neutrosophic

34.1 a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutrosophic

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

35.1 a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutrosophic

45.1 “SuperHyperGraph-Based Books”: | Featured Tweets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 362

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

45.16“SuperHyperGraph-Based Books”: | Featured Tweets #66 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 375

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

9.1 The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges

14.1 The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges

15.1 The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges

17.1 An Overlook On This Research And Beyond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104

29.1 The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges