GABRIEL INDIA LTD SANAND MSA-2

GAUGE R& R STUDY AVERAGE AND RANGE METHOD BASED ON TOLERANCE - DATA SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1

PART NAME : OUTERTUBE DESCRIPTION : Axle hole to Top SAMPLE 10 GAUGE NO : FIH01/SIH01

DATE : 5/13/2022 SPECIFICATION : 20.2/19.8 (MM) OPERATOR 3 GAUGE NAME HEIGHT GAUGE

PERFORMED BY PRIYANKA TOLRANCE: 0.400 TRIALS 3.0 TV= = Tolerance /6

0.0667
SL. APPRAISER TRIAL # PART SERIAL NUMBER
No. NAME 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 AVERAGE
1 PROMOD 19.87 19.87 19.86 19.85 19.84 19.86 19.83 19.86 19.87 19.82 19.853
2 AFROZ 1 19.87 19.86 19.85 19.85 19.85 19.85 19.82 19.82 19.84 19.86 19.847
3 PANKAJ 19.85 19.85 19.86 19.85 19.84 19.83 19.85 19.85 19.87 19.84 19.849
4 Average 19.863 19.860 19.857 19.850 19.843 19.847 19.833 19.843 19.860 19.840 19.850 Xa
5 UCL x 19.873 19.873 19.873 19.873 19.873 19.873 19.873 19.873 19.873 19.873
6 LCL x 19.833 19.833 19.833 19.833 19.833 19.833 19.833 19.833 19.833 19.833
7 Range 0.020 0.020 0.010 0.000 0.010 0.030 0.030 0.040 0.030 0.040 0.023 Ra
8 NAME 1.000 2.000 3.000 4.000 5.000 6.000 7.000 8.000 9.000 10.000 AVERAGE
9 PROMOD 19.82 19.86 19.86 19.84 19.84 19.86 19.86 19.86 19.86 19.84 19.85
10 AFROZ 2 19.83 19.87 19.85 19.85 19.85 19.87 19.85 19.86 19.85 19.85 19.853
11 PANKAJ 19.84 19.85 19.85 19.87 19.85 19.85 19.87 19.85 19.86 19.82 19.851
12 Average 19.830 19.860 19.853 19.853 19.847 19.860 19.860 19.857 19.857 19.837 19.851 Xb
13 UCL x 19.873 19.873 19.873 19.873 19.873 19.873 19.873 19.873 19.873 19.873
14 LCL x 19.833 19.833 19.833 19.833 19.833 19.833 19.833 19.833 19.833 19.833
15 Range 0.020 0.020 0.010 0.030 0.010 0.020 0.020 0.010 0.010 0.030 0.018 Rb
16 NAME 1.000 2.000 3.000 4.000 5.000 6.000 7.000 8.000 9.000 10.000 AVERAGE
17 PROMOD 19.86 19.87 19.86 19.85 19.85 19.87 19.84 19.87 19.86 19.84 19.857
18 AFROZ 3 19.85 19.88 19.84 19.87 19.87 19.85 19.85 19.85 19.86 19.86 19.858
19 PANKAJ 19.87 19.87 19.85 19.85 19.86 19.87 19.85 19.87 19.87 19.84 19.86
20 Average 19.860 19.873 19.850 19.857 19.860 19.863 19.847 19.863 19.863 19.847 19.858 Xc
21 UCL x 19.873 19.873 19.873 19.873 19.873 19.873 19.873 19.873 19.873 19.873
22 LCL x 19.833 19.833 19.833 19.833 19.833 19.833 19.833 19.833 19.833 19.833
23 Range 0.020 0.010 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.010 0.020 0.010 0.020 0.017 Rc
24 Part 19.8531 Xabc
25 Average Xp 19.851 19.864 19.853 19.853 19.850 19.857 19.847 19.854 19.860 19.841 0.0233 Rp
26 0.0193 Rabc
27 0.0087 Xdiff.

28 Upper Control Limit for range UCLR = Rabc x D4= ( note= D4 is 3.27 for 2 trials and 2.58 for 3 trials ) 0.0499 UCLR

29 Lower Control Limit for range LCLR = Rabc x D3= (note= D3 = 0 for upto 7 trials.) 0.0000 LCLR

30 Upper Control Limit for Averages UCLx = Xabc + A2 x Average R= (note= A2 = 1.023 for 3 trials.) 19.8729 UCLx

31 Lower Control Limit for Averages LCLx = Xabc - A2 x Average R= (note= A2 = 1.023 for 3 trials.) 19.8333 LCLx
NOTE :
.- Plot Range Chart & Average Chart to ensure the adequacy of Measurement System. ADEQUACY : Each range should be within UCL. And in case of X Bar chart - minimume 50% of
X Bar chart should be outside the control limits.
.- The number of distinct Data categories should be equal or more than 5, then only the Measurement System can be declared as acceptable for the analysis of the process.
.- UCLR represents the limit of individual R's. Circle those that are beyond this limit. Identify the cause and correct, Repeat these readings using the same appraiser and unit
as originally used or discard values and reaverage and recompute R and the limiting value from the remaining observations.

* If the instrument /gageis required to be used for the process capability study then select the components within process variation for GR&R study. Simillarly select the components within

tolerance if the instrument / gage is required to be used in final inspection or process control.

G4Q059/0119
 MSA-2

GAUGE R&R STUDY AVERAGE AND RANGE METHOD BASED ON TOLERANCE-CALCULATION AND REPORT PAGE 1 OF 2

PART NAME : OUTERTUBE DESCRIPTION : Axle hole to Top SAMPLE 10 GAUGE NO : FIH01/SIH01

DATE : 5/13/2022 SPECIFICATION : 20.2/19.8 (MM) OPERATOR 3 GAUGE NAME HEIGHT GAUGE

PERFORMED BY PRIYANKA TOLRANCE: 0.400 TRIALS 3

This should be equal or

From data sheet Rabc= 0.01933 X diff = 0.00867 Tolerance = 0.0667
more than 5

MEASUREMENT UNIT ANALYSIS % TOTAL TOLERANCE

Repeatability i.e. Equipment Variation (EV) % EV= 100 [EV/TV]

EV = Rabc X K1 = 17.1
= 0.0114221333333332 Trials K1
2 0.8862
3 0.5908
Reproducability I.e.Appraiser Variation (AV) % AV= 100[AV/TV]
Appraisers 2 3 = 8.6437
AV = [ (Xdiff x K2)2 - ( EV2 / nr ) ] K2 0.7071 0.5231
n= Number of parts
Xdiff x K2= 0.00612819999999995 EV 0.011422 r = Number of trials
(Xdiff x K2) =
2
0.000038 EV /nr = 0.000004
2

(Xdiff x K2)2 -(EV2/nr)= 0.000033

AV= 0.00576246454021061
Repeatability & Reproducability (R & R) % R & R= 100[R&R/TV]
19.2
R & R= ( EV2+ AV2) EV2 0.0001305 Note: Accept if < 10%
AV2 0.0000332 Accept on Deviation
R & R= 0.0128 R & R2 0.000164 if >10% and <30%
No.of distinct data
categories
NOTE : PV, TV , & % ge of PV are not applicable since the analysis = 1.41*(PV/R&R)
is based on Tolerance. = 7.3
Since PV = TV

Remarks:
Acceptable
Accepted On Deviation.
Not Acceptable

G4Q059/0119 Sign. :
Guidelines for acceptance of gauge repeatability and reproducability (% R & R) MSA-2

1.Under 10 % error = The measurement system is acceptable. PAGE 1 OF 3

2.10 % to 30 % error = may be acceptable based upon importance of application,cost of gauge,

3.Cost of repairs etc.Over 30 % error= measurement system needs improvement.

Make every effort to identify the problems and have them corrected.

Points for justification to accept the gauge under deviation : ( Tick mark the reason and provide data if applicable)

1 Gauge application is not much important as automatic correction exists.

2 Cost of replacing the gauge is too high.

3 Cost of repairing the gauge is too high.

4 Process Capability is more than 2.5, hence R & R % (10-30%) can be considered as acceptable

on deviation

If R&R% is equal or more than 30% then following analysis to be carried out and
and to have the action plan to get R&R within acceptable limit.

case I If repeatability is comparatively higher than reproducabililty, identify causes related to instrument / equipment

a) The instrument may need maintenance

b) The Gauge may have to be redesigned to be more rigid

c) Clamping or location for gauging needs to be improved.

case II If reproducability is comparatively higher than repeatability, use graphical method and identify following causes

a) The appraiser needs to be better trained in how to use and read the gauge / instrument.

b) Calibrations on the gauge dial are not clear.

c) Fixture of some sort may be needed to help the appraiser use the gauge more consistently.

G4Q059/0119
 RANGE CHART - APPRAISER 1
Range
0.0600
0.0500
0.0400
0.0300
0.0200
0.0100
0.0000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Component Serial Number

RANGE CHART - APPRAISER 2

0.0600
Range

0.0500

0.0400

0.0300

0.0200

0.0100

0.0000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Component Serial Number

RANGE CHART - APPRAISER 3

0.0600
Range

0.0500

0.0400

0.0300

0.0200

0.0100

0.0000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Component Serial Number

Guideline
If all the individual ranges are within control limits, all appraisers are consistent and
are using the gauge in the same ways.

Conclusion Acceptable
Guideline for analysis of Average Chart :
The area within the control limits represents the measurement discrimination ("noise"). Since the group of parts used in the study represents the process variation,
approximately one half or more of the averages should fall outside the control limits. If the data shows this pattern, then the measurement system should be
considered adequate to detect part to part variation and measurement system can provide useful information for analyzing and controlling the process. If less than
half fall out side the limit , then either the measurement system has inadequate discrimination or the sample does not represent the expected process variation.

Conclusion : The percentage of points beyond the control limits = 0% So gage is adequate.

The measurement system has inadequate discrimination or the sample does not represent the expected process variation.
Average Readings

AVERAGE CHART FOR THE APPRAISER 1

19.880
19.870
19.860 Average
19.850 UCL x
19.840 LCL x
19.830
19.820
19.810
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Component number

AVERAGE CHART FOR APPRAISER 2 & 3 Page No. : 02 of 02

A ve ra ge R ea d in gs

AVERAGE CHART FOR THE APPRAISER 2

19.880
19.870
Average
19.860
19.850 UCL x
19.840
LCL x
19.830
19.820
19.810
19.800
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Component No.s
Average Readings

AVERAGE CHART FOR THE APPRAISER 3

19.870
Average

19.850 UCL x

LCL x

19.830

19.810
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Component Number