GABRIEL INDIA LTD SANAND MSA-7

GAUGE R& R STUDY AVERAGE AND RANGE METHOD BASED ON TOLERANCE - DATA SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1

PART NAME : Outertube DESCRIPTION : Total Height SAMPLE 10 GAUGE NO : FIH01/SIH01

DATE : 8/28/2022 SPECIFICATION : 249.5/250.5 (MM) OPERATOR 3 GAUGE NAME HEIGHT GAUGE

PERFORMED BY Priyanka TOLRANCE: 1.000 TRIALS 3.0 TV= = Tolerance /6

0.1667
SL. APPRAISER TRIAL # PART SERIAL NUMBER
No. NAME 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 AVERAGE
1 HANUMAN 249.60 249.54 249.59 249.62 249.64 249.63 249.65 249.68 249.63 249.69 249.627
2 AJIT 1 249.61 249.54 249.58 249.61 249.63 249.65 249.64 249.68 249.65 249.68 249.627
3 AKSHAY 249.60 249.54 249.59 249.63 249.64 249.65 249.65 249.68 249.65 249.69 249.632
4 Average 249.603 249.540 249.587 249.620 249.637 249.643 249.647 249.680 249.643 249.687 249.629 Xa
5 UCL x 249.641 249.641 249.641 249.641 249.641 249.641 249.641 249.641 249.641 249.641
6 LCL x 249.619 249.619 249.619 249.619 249.619 249.619 249.619 249.619 249.619 249.619
7 Range 0.010 0.000 0.010 0.020 0.010 0.020 0.010 0.000 0.020 0.010 0.011000000000001 Ra
8 NAME 1.000 2.000 3.000 4.000 5.000 6.000 7.000 8.000 9.000 10.000 AVERAGE
9 HANUMAN 249.60 249.53 249.58 249.63 249.64 249.65 249.64 249.69 249.65 249.69 249.63
10 AJIT 2 249.61 249.54 249.57 249.62 249.64 249.64 249.64 249.68 249.64 249.69 249.627
11 AKSHAY 249.60 249.53 249.58 249.63 249.64 249.64 249.65 249.68 249.64 249.69 249.628
12 Average 249.603 249.533 249.577 249.627 249.640 249.643 249.643 249.683 249.643 249.690 249.628 Xb
13 UCL x 249.641 249.641 249.641 249.641 249.641 249.641 249.641 249.641 249.641 249.641
14 LCL x 249.619 249.619 249.619 249.619 249.619 249.619 249.619 249.619 249.619 249.619
15 Range 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.000 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.000 0.008000000000007 Rb
16 NAME 1.000 2.000 3.000 4.000 5.000 6.000 7.000 8.000 9.000 10.000 AVERAGE
17 HANUMAN 249.62 249.54 249.60 249.64 249.65 249.64 249.65 249.67 249.65 249.68 249.634
18 AJIT 3 249.61 249.53 249.59 249.63 249.66 249.65 249.64 249.68 249.63 249.69 249.631
19 AKSHAY 249.60 249.55 249.59 249.63 249.65 249.64 249.65 249.67 249.65 249.68 249.631
20 Average 249.610 249.540 249.593 249.633 249.653 249.643 249.647 249.673 249.643 249.683 249.632 Xc
21 UCL x 249.641 249.641 249.641 249.641 249.641 249.641 249.641 249.641 249.641 249.641
22 LCL x 249.619 249.619 249.619 249.619 249.619 249.619 249.619 249.619 249.619 249.619
23 Range 0.020 0.020 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.020 0.010 0.013000000000005 Rc
24 Part 249.6297 Xabc
25 Average Xp 249.606 249.538 249.586 249.627 249.643 249.643 249.646 249.679 249.643 249.687 0.1489 Rp
26 0.0107 Rabc
27 0.0037 Xdiff.

28 Upper Control Limit for range UCLR = Rabc x D4= ( note= D4 is 3.27 for 2 trials and 2.58 for 3 trials ) 0.0275 UCLR

29 Lower Control Limit for range LCLR = Rabc x D3= (note= D3 = 0 for upto 7 trials.) 0.0000 LCLR

30 Upper Control Limit for Averages UCLx = Xabc + A2 x Average R= (note= A2 = 1.023 for 3 trials.) 249.6406 UCLx

31 Lower Control Limit for Averages LCLx = Xabc - A2 x Average R= (note= A2 = 1.023 for 3 trials.) 249.6188 LCLx
NOTE :
.- Plot Range Chart & Average Chart to ensure the adequacy of Measurement System. ADEQUACY : Each range should be within UCL. And in case of X Bar chart - minimume 50% of
X Bar chart should be outside the control limits.
.- The number of distinct Data categories should be equal or more than 5, then only the Measurement System can be declared as acceptable for the analysis of the process.
.- UCLR represents the limit of individual R's. Circle those that are beyond this limit. Identify the cause and correct, Repeat these readings using the same appraiser and unit
as originally used or discard values and reaverage and recompute R and the limiting value from the remaining observations.

* If the instrument /gageis required to be used for the process capability study then select the components within process variation for GR&R study. Simillarly select the components within

tolerance if the instrument / gage is required to be used in final inspection or process control.
G4Q059/0119
 MSA-7

GAUGE R&R STUDY AVERAGE AND RANGE METHOD BASED ON TOLERANCE-CALCULATION AND REPORT PAGE 1 OF 2

PART NAME : Outertube DESCRIPTION : Total Height SAMPLE 10 GAUGE NO : FIH01/SIH01

DATE : 8/28/2022 SPECIFICATION : 249.5/250.5 (MM) OPERATOR 3 GAUGE NAME HEIGHT GAUGE

PERFORMED BY Priyanka TOLRANCE: 1.000 TRIALS 3

From data sheet Rabc= 0.01067 X diff = 0.00367 Tolerance = This should be equal or
0.1667
more than 5

MEASUREMENT UNIT ANALYSIS % TOTAL TOLERANCE

Repeatability i.e. Equipment Variation (EV) % EV= 100 [EV/TV]

EV = Rabc X K1 = 3.8
= 0.00630186666666933 Trials K1
2 0.8862
3 0.5908
Reproducability I.e.Appraiser Variation (AV) % AV= 100[AV/TV]
Appraisers 2 3 = 1.3941
AV = [ (Xdiff x K2)2 - ( EV2 / nr ) ] K2 0.7071 0.5231
n= Number of parts
Xdiff x K2= 0.00259269999998558 EV 0.006302 r = Number of trials
(Xdiff x K2)2= 0.000007 EV2/nr = 0.000001
(Xdiff x K2)2 -(EV2/nr)= 0.000005
AV= 0.00232342617136331
Repeatability & Reproducability (R & R) % R & R= 100[R&R/TV]
4.0
R & R= ( EV2+ AV2) EV2 0.0000397 Note: Accept if < 10%
AV2 0.0000054 Accept on Deviation
R & R= 0.0067 R & R2 0.000045 if >10% and <30%
No.of distinct data
categories
NOTE : PV, TV , & % ge of PV are not applicable since the analysis = 1.41*(PV/R&R)
is based on Tolerance. = 35.0
Since PV = TV

Remarks:
Acceptable
Accepted On Deviation.
Not Acceptable

G4Q059/0119 Sign. :
Guidelines for acceptance of gauge repeatability and reproducability (% R & R) MSA-7

1.Under 10 % error = The measurement system is acceptable. PAGE 1 OF 3

2.10 % to 30 % error = may be acceptable based upon importance of application,cost of gauge,

3.Cost of repairs etc.Over 30 % error= measurement system needs improvement.

Make every effort to identify the problems and have them corrected.

Points for justification to accept the gauge under deviation : ( Tick mark the reason and provide data if applicable)

1 Gauge application is not much important as automatic correction exists.

2 Cost of replacing the gauge is too high.

3 Cost of repairing the gauge is too high.

4 Process Capability is more than 2.5, hence R & R % (10-30%) can be considered as acceptable

on deviation

If R&R% is equal or more than 30% then following analysis to be carried out and
and to have the action plan to get R&R within acceptable limit.

case I If repeatability is comparatively higher than reproducabililty, identify causes related to instrument / equipment

a) The instrument may need maintenance

b) The Gauge may have to be redesigned to be more rigid

c) Clamping or location for gauging needs to be improved.

case II If reproducability is comparatively higher than repeatability, use graphical method and identify following causes

a) The appraiser needs to be better trained in how to use and read the gauge / instrument.

b) Calibrations on the gauge dial are not clear.

c) Fixture of some sort may be needed to help the appraiser use the gauge more consistently.

G4Q059/0119
 RANGE CHART - APPRAISER 1
Range
0.0300
0.0250
0.0200
0.0150
0.0100
0.0050
0.0000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Component Serial Number

RANGE CHART - APPRAISER 2

0.0300
Range

0.0250

0.0200

0.0150

0.0100

0.0050

0.0000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Component Serial Number

RANGE CHART - APPRAISER 3

0.0300
Range

0.0250

0.0200

0.0150

0.0100

0.0050

0.0000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Component Serial Number

Guideline
If all the individual ranges are within control limits, all appraisers are consistent and
are using the gauge in the same ways.

Conclusion Acceptable
Guideline for analysis of Average Chart :
The area within the control limits represents the measurement discrimination ("noise"). Since the group of parts used in the study represents the process variation,
approximately one half or more of the averages should fall outside the control limits. If the data shows this pattern, then the measurement system should be
considered adequate to detect part to part variation and measurement system can provide useful information for analyzing and controlling the process. If less than
half fall out side the limit , then either the measurement system has inadequate discrimination or the sample does not represent the expected process variation.

Conclusion : The percentage of points beyond the control limits = 0% So gage is adequate.

The measurement system has inadequate discrimination or the sample does not represent the expected process variation.
Average Readings

AVERAGE CHART FOR THE APPRAISER 1

249.700

249.650 Av-
249.600 er-
UCL x
age
249.550 LCL x
249.500

249.450
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Component number

AVERAGE CHART FOR APPRAISER 2 & 3 Page No. : 02 of 02

A ve ra ge R ea d in gs

AVERAGE CHART FOR THE APPRAISER 2

249.750
249.700 Average
249.650
UCL x
249.600
LCL x
249.550
249.500
249.450
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Component No.s
Average Readings

AVERAGE CHART FOR THE APPRAISER 3

249.700
249.650 Average

249.600 UCL x

LCL x
249.550
249.500
249.450
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Component Number