GABRIEL INDIA LTD SANAND MSA-1

GAUGE R& R STUDY AVERAGE AND RANGE METHOD BASED ON TOLERANCE - DATA SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1

PART NAME : INNER TUBE DESCRIPTION : Outer Diameter SAMPLE 10 GAUGE NO : FIV01

DATE : 4/25/2022 SPECIFICATION : 28.40/28.60 OPERATOR 3 GAUGE NAME DIGITAL VERNIER 0-150MM

PERFORMED BY PRIYANKA TOLRANCE: 0.200 TRIALS 3.0 TV= = Tolerance /6

0.0333
SL. APPRAISER TRIAL # PART SERIAL NUMBER
No. NAME 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 AVERAGE
1 ROSHAN 28.500 28.520 28.510 28.511 28.500 28.510 28.520 28.510 28.520 28.510 28.5111
2 ROSHAN 1 28.500 28.520 28.510 28.512 28.500 28.510 28.520 28.500 28.510 28.510 28.5092
3 ROSHAN 28.500 28.520 28.510 28.510 28.510 28.510 28.520 28.500 28.520 28.510 28.511
4 Average 28.500 28.520 28.510 28.511 28.503 28.510 28.520 28.503 28.517 28.510 28.510 Xa
5 UCL x 28.514 28.514 28.514 28.514 28.514 28.514 28.514 28.514 28.514 28.514
6 LCL x 28.506 28.506 28.506 28.506 28.506 28.506 28.506 28.506 28.506 28.506
7 Range 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.002 0.010 0.000 0.000 0.010 0.010 0.000 0.0032 Ra
8 NAME 1.000 2.000 3.000 4.000 5.000 6.000 7.000 8.000 9.000 10.000 AVERAGE
9 SAGAR 28.500 28.510 28.510 28.510 28.500 28.510 28.510 28.520 28.520 28.500 28.509
10 SAGAR 2 28.500 28.500 28.510 28.510 28.500 28.510 28.510 28.520 28.520 28.500 28.508
11 SAGAR 28.500 28.510 28.510 28.510 28.500 28.510 28.510 28.510 28.520 28.500 28.508
12 Average 28.500 28.507 28.510 28.510 28.500 28.510 28.510 28.517 28.520 28.500 28.508 Xb
13 UCL x 28.514 28.514 28.514 28.514 28.514 28.514 28.514 28.514 28.514 28.514
14 LCL x 28.506 28.506 28.506 28.506 28.506 28.506 28.506 28.506 28.506 28.506
15 Range 0.000 0.010 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.010 0.000 0.000 0.002 Rb
16 NAME 1.000 2.000 3.000 4.000 5.000 6.000 7.000 8.000 9.000 10.000 AVERAGE
17 ROHIT 28.500 28.510 28.520 28.510 28.510 28.510 28.520 28.500 28.510 28.510 28.51
18 ROHIT 3 28.500 28.500 28.510 28.520 28.510 28.520 28.520 28.500 28.510 28.510 28.51
19 ROHIT 28.500 28.510 28.520 28.520 28.510 28.520 28.510 28.500 28.520 28.510 28.512
20 Average 28.500 28.507 28.517 28.517 28.510 28.517 28.517 28.500 28.513 28.510 28.511 Xc
21 UCL x 28.514 28.514 28.514 28.514 28.514 28.514 28.514 28.514 28.514 28.514
22 LCL x 28.506 28.506 28.506 28.506 28.506 28.506 28.506 28.506 28.506 28.506
23 Range 0.000 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.000 0.010 0.010 0.000 0.010 0.000 0.006 Rc
24 Part 28.5098 Xabc
25 Average Xp 28.500 28.511 28.512 28.513 28.504 28.512 28.516 28.507 28.517 28.507 0.0167 Rp
26 0.0037 Rabc
27 0.0023 Xdiff.

28 Upper Control Limit for range UCLR = Rabc x D4= ( note= D4 is 3.27 for 2 trials and 2.58 for 3 trials ) 0.0096 UCLR

29 Lower Control Limit for range LCLR = Rabc x D3= (note= D3 = 0 for upto 7 trials.) 0.0000 LCLR

30 Upper Control Limit for Averages UCLx = Xabc + A2 x Average R= (note= A2 = 1.023 for 3 trials.) 28.5136 UCLx

31 Lower Control Limit for Averages LCLx = Xabc - A2 x Average R= (note= A2 = 1.023 for 3 trials.) 28.5060 LCLx
NOTE :
.- Plot Range Chart & Average Chart to ensure the adequacy of Measurement System. ADEQUACY : Each range should be within UCL. And in case of X Bar chart - minimume 50% of
X Bar chart should be outside the control limits.
.- The number of distinct Data categories should be equal or more than 5, then only the Measurement System can be declared as acceptable for the analysis of the process.
.- UCLR represents the limit of individual R's. Circle those that are beyond this limit. Identify the cause and correct, Repeat these readings using the same appraiser and unit
as originally used or discard values and reaverage and recompute R and the limiting value from the remaining observations.

* If the instrument /gageis required to be used for the process capability study then select the components within process variation for GR&R study. Simillarly select the components within

tolerance if the instrument / gage is required to be used in final inspection or process control.

G4Q059/0119
 MSA-1

GAUGE R&R STUDY AVERAGE AND RANGE METHOD BASED ON TOLERANCE-CALCULATION AND REPORT PAGE 1 OF 2

PART NAME : INNER TUBE DESCRIPTION : Outer Diameter SAMPLE 10 GAUGE NO : FIV01

DATE : 4/25/2022 SPECIFICATION : 28.40/28.60 OPERATOR 3 GAUGE NAME DIGITAL VERNIER 0-150MM

PERFORMED BY PRIYANKA TOLRANCE: 0.200 TRIALS 3

From data sheet Rabc= 0.00373 X diff = 0.00233 Tolerance = 0.0333

MEASUREMENT UNIT ANALYSIS % TOTAL TOLERANCE

Repeatability i.e. Equipment Variation (EV) % EV= 100 [EV/TV]

EV = Rabc X K1 = 6.6
= 0.00220565333333316 Trials K1
2 0.8862
3 0.5908
Reproducability I.e.Appraiser Variation (AV) % AV= 100[AV/TV]
Appraisers 2 3 = 4.8000
AV = [ (Xdiff x K2)2 - ( EV2 / nr ) ] K2 0.7071 0.5231
n= Number of parts
Xdiff x K2= 0.0016498999999995 EV 0.002206 r = Number of trials
(Xdiff x K2) =
2
0.000003 EV /nr = 0.000000
2

(Xdiff x K2)2 -(EV2/nr)= 0.000003

AV= 0.00160000201742693
Repeatability & Reproducability (R & R) % R & R= 100[R&R/TV]
8.2
R & R= ( EV2+ AV2) EV2 0.0000049 Note: Accept if < 10%
AV2 0.0000026 Accept on Deviation
R & R= 0.0027 R & R2 0.000007 if >10% and <30%
No.of distinct data
categories
NOTE : PV, TV , & % ge of PV are not applicable since the analysis = 1.41*(PV/R&R)
is based on Tolerance. = 17.2 This should be equal or
more than 5
Since PV = TV

Remarks:
Acceptable
Accepted On Deviation.
Not Acceptable

G4Q059/0119 Sign. :
Guidelines for acceptance of gauge repeatability and reproducability (% R & R) MSA-1

1.Under 10 % error = The measurement system is acceptable. PAGE 1 OF 3

2.10 % to 30 % error = may be acceptable based upon importance of application,cost of gauge,

3.Cost of repairs etc.Over 30 % error= measurement system needs improvement.

Make every effort to identify the problems and have them corrected.

Points for justification to accept the gauge under deviation : ( Tick mark the reason and provide data if applicable)

1 Gauge application is not much important as automatic correction exists.

2 Cost of replacing the gauge is too high.

3 Cost of repairing the gauge is too high.

4 Process Capability is more than 2.5, hence R & R % (10-30%) can be considered as acceptable

on deviation

If R&R% is equal or more than 30% then following analysis to be carried out and
and to have the action plan to get R&R within acceptable limit.

case I If repeatability is comparatively higher than reproducabililty, identify causes related to instrument / equipment

a) The instrument may need maintenance

b) The Gauge may have to be redesigned to be more rigid

c) Clamping or location for gauging needs to be improved.

case II If reproducability is comparatively higher than repeatability, use graphical method and identify following causes

a) The appraiser needs to be better trained in how to use and read the gauge / instrument.

b) Calibrations on the gauge dial are not clear.

c) Fixture of some sort may be needed to help the appraiser use the gauge more consistently.

G4Q059/0119
 RANGE CHART - APPRAISER 1
Range
0.0120
0.0100
0.0080
0.0060
0.0040
0.0020
0.0000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Component Serial Number

RANGE CHART - APPRAISER 2

0.0120
Range

0.0100

0.0080

0.0060

0.0040

0.0020

0.0000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Component Serial Number

RANGE CHART - APPRAISER 3

0.0120
Range

0.0100

0.0080

0.0060

0.0040

0.0020

0.0000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Component Serial Number

Guideline
If all the individual ranges are within control limits, all appraisers are consistent and
are using the gauge in the same ways.

Conclusion Acceptable
Guideline for analysis of Average Chart :
The area within the control limits represents the measurement discrimination ("noise"). Since the group of parts used in the study represents the process variation,
approximately one half or more of the averages should fall outside the control limits. If the data shows this pattern, then the measurement system should be
considered adequate to detect part to part variation and measurement system can provide useful information for analyzing and controlling the process. If less than
half fall out side the limit , then either the measurement system has inadequate discrimination or the sample does not represent the expected process variation.

Conclusion : The percentage of points beyond the control limits = 0% So gage is adequate.

The measurement system has inadequate discrimination or the sample does not represent the expected process variation.
Average Readings

AVERAGE CHART FOR THE APPRAISER 1

28.525
28.520
28.515 Average
28.510 UCL x
28.505 LCL x
28.500
28.495
28.490
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Component number

AVERAGE CHART FOR APPRAISER 2 & 3 Page No. : 02 of 02

A ve ra ge R ea d in gs

AVERAGE CHART FOR THE APPRAISER 2

28.525
28.520
Average
28.515
UCL x
28.510
28.505 LCL x
28.500
28.495
28.490
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Component No.s
Average Readings

AVERAGE CHART FOR THE APPRAISER 3

28.520
28.515 Average
28.510 UCL x
28.505 LCL x
28.500
28.495
28.490
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Component Number