ARELLANO UNIVERSITY

Jose Abad Santos Campus

Basic Education Department – Senior High School
3058 Taft Avenue Pasay City

RESEARCH DEPARTMENT
MOCK DEFENSE
ORAL PROPOSAL DEFENSE RATING SHEET

Researcher :
Date of Defense :
Strand/Section :
Research Title :

Criteria Weight Rating

A. Research Paper 30%
1. Originality and uniqueness of research topic
2. Organization and style of research paper
3. Depth of analysis and interpretation

B. Research Evaluation 30%

1. Technical Feasibility
2. Innovativeness
3. Applicability
4. Impact on Environment
C. Oral Presentation 40%
1. Quality of Presentation
a. Organization/comprehensiveness
b. Mastery of the content
c. Clarity and brevity of communicated information
d. Evidence of careful planning and preparation
2. Ability to answer questions
a. Precision and clarity
b. Consistency and reliability of answers
3. Personal Attributes of the Presenter
a. Good communication skills
b. Poise and confidence
c. Physical appearance
d. Well – prepared
OVER-ALL RATING 100%

COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS:

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Grade Equivalent:
95-100 – EXCELLENT Rater: Verified by:
90-94 – PASSED w/minor revision ________________________________________
85-89 – PASSED w/major revision Member
80-84- PASSED w/consultation Mary Ann Adolfo
70-79 – FAILED ________________________________________ Chairman
Member

ARELLANO UNIVERSITY
 Jose Abad Santos Campus
Basic Education Department – Senior High School
3058 Taft Avenue Pasay City

RESEARCH DEPARTMENT
MOCK DEFENSE
ORAL PROPOSAL DEFENSE RATING SHEET

Researcher :
Date of Defense :
Strand/Section :
Research Title :

Criteria Weight Rating

A. Research Paper 30%
4. Originality and uniqueness of research topic
5. Organization and style of research paper
6. Depth of analysis and interpretation

B. Research Evaluation 30%

5. Technical Feasibility
6. Innovativeness
7. Applicability
8. Impact on Environment
C. Oral Presentation 40%
4. Quality of Presentation
e. Organization/comprehensiveness
f. Mastery of the content
g. Clarity and brevity of communicated information
h. Evidence of careful planning and preparation
5. Ability to answer questions
c. Precision and clarity
d. Consistency and reliability of answers
6. Personal Attributes of the Presenter
e. Good communication skills
f. Poise and confidence
g. Physical appearance
h. Well – prepared
OVER-ALL RATING 100%

COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS:

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Grade Equivalent:
95-100 – EXCELLENT Rater: Verified by:
90-94 – PASSED w/minor revision ________________________________________
85-89 – PASSED w/major revision Member
80-84- PASSED w/consultation
70-79 – FAILED ________________________________________ Chairman
Member
ARELLANO UNIVERSITY
Jose Abad Santos Campus
Basic Education Department – Senior High School
3058 Taft Avenue Pasay City
 RESEARCH DEPARTMENT
MOCK DEFENSE
ORAL PROPOSAL DEFENSE RATING SHEET

Researcher :
Date of Defense :
Strand/Section :
Research Title :
Criteria Weight Rating
A. Research Paper 30%
7. Originality and uniqueness of research topic
8. Organization and style of research paper
9. Depth of analysis and interpretation

B. Research Evaluation 30%

9. Technical Feasibility
10. Innovativeness
11. Applicability
12. Impact on Environment
C. Oral Presentation 40%
7. Quality of Presentation
i. Organization/comprehensiveness
j. Mastery of the content
k. Clarity and brevity of communicated information
l. Evidence of careful planning and preparation
8. Ability to answer questions
e. Precision and clarity
f. Consistency and reliability of answers
9. Personal Attributes of the Presenter
i. Good communication skills
j. Poise and confidence
k. Physical appearance
l. Well – prepared
OVER-ALL RATING 100%

COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS:

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Grade Equivalent:
95-100 – EXCELLENT Rater: Verified by:
90-94 – PASSED w/minor revision ________________________________________
85-89 – PASSED w/major revision Member
80-84- PASSED w/consultation
70-79 – FAILED ________________________________________ Chairman
Member