Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EVALUATION!
EVALUATION!
1.1 Analyse the characteristics of the audience for a chosen creative media production activity.
1.2 Interpret research activity to develop ideas and creative proposals for a chosen audience.
2.1 Demonstrate independence in decision making in planning and developing creative solutions.
2.2 Select appropriate media and processes to communicate ideas for an identified audience.
DESIGN
CYCLE
THE RESEARCH
DESIGN
DEVELOP
IDEAS
CYCLE
THE RESEARCH
DESIGN
DEVELOP
IDEAS
CYCLE
CREATE
THE RESEARCH
DESIGN
DEVELOP
EVALUATE
IDEAS
CYCLE
CREATE
UNIT 10
Assessment criteria
1.1 Analyse the characteristics of the audience for a chosen creative media production activity.
1.2 Interpret research activity to develop ideas and creative proposals for a chosen audience. RESEARCH
2.1 Demonstrate independence in decision making in planning and developing creative solutions. DEVELOP IDEAS
2.2 Select appropriate media and processes to communicate ideas for an identified audience. CREATE
PASS
Clearly communicated evidence of
valid evaluation and realistic analysis evaluation impacting ideas
independently used to inform and
develop ideas.
MERIT
DISTINCTION
Accomplished and professional communication of
perceptive analysis and interpretation, demonstrating astute & mature critique that push your ideas further
clarity and sophistication in thinking and maturity in
decision making to progress ideas.
What are these extra terms
Juan & I keep using?
Critical Thinking:
“The fish & chips I ate for lunch was a heavy, stodgy meal and a
huge portion. It contained a lot of carbohydrates which can be good
for giving you energy; however, this afternoon I’m just sitting at my
desk not burning off energy so it has caused me to feel very full and
lethargic”.
Critical / Evaluative (making links & reasoned, objective,
judgements)
D.I.E.
D.I.E.
Like the UAL criteria
Juan & Charlotte use to
DEFINE assess your work? ? Yes!
the criteria (HOW to assess & WHO for?) And for Unit 10 defining
who your audience is!
D.I.E.
DEFINE Draw links
between elements
the criteria (HOW to assess & WHO for?) & the criteria
INTERPRET
the characteristics (WHAT & WHERE)
EVALUATE
the merits & pitfalls off these characteristics with reference to our defined criteria
D.I.E.
It’s not just a
DEFINE personal opinion,
be objective -
the criteria (HOW to assess & WHO for?) like me, I don’t
discriminate…
INTERPRET
the characteristics (WHAT & WHERE)
EXPLAIN
the strengths & weaknesses (WHY do they fit the criteria?)
So what?
And what about Sally???
Today you’re not Marvel colourists… You’re detectives!!
EVALUATE why the items may or may not be the murder weapon:
WITH ALL THE INFORMATION,
WHICH WEAPON DO YOU THINK WAS USED TO KILL SALLY?
Choose your weapon…
1. Pick an item at random
2. Identify characteristics that could implicate item as the murder weapon (5 mins)
Choose your weapon…
1. Pick an item at random
2. Identify characteristics that could implicate item as the murder weapon (5 mins)
3. Pair up with whoever has the same item as you
4. Discuss how to convince your jury that this WAS the murder weapon (5 mins)
Choose your weapon…
1. Pick an item at random
2. Identify characteristics that could implicate item as the murder weapon (5 mins)
3. Pair up with whoever has the same item as you
4. Discuss how to convince your jury that this WAS the murder weapon (5 mins)
5. Pairs: present your argument to the jury! (1 min MAX)
6. Jury: Judge 1 - 9 how strongly you are convinced that this is the murder weapon
#JUSTICEFORSALLY