Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Moreover, the penalties imposed upon the accused discourages the victim to
come out and claim that he or she was wronged with the creation of a sex scandal, at
the risk of being publicly ridiculed by society. Thus, sex scandals were not effectively
prosecuted and offenders get off.
The Philippines took on its first step when the Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act
was enacted as basis for prosecuting the offenders in sex scandals. However, a
challenge still lies in the uncovering of evidence to prove the guilt of the accused
beyond reasonable doubt.[2]
REFERENCES:
[1] Sandra Araneta, Kho, Belo summoned over Katrina sex video, Phil. Star, May 22 2009. Retrieved from
http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleId=470134.
[2] Mendoza, C. (2012). Balancing of Interest in the Digital Age: Protection of Rights of Offended Parties
and the Constitutional Rights of the Accused in the Context of Sex Scandals. Philippine Law Journal, 86.
Retrieved from http://plj.upd.edu.ph/balancing-of-interest-in-the-digitalage-protection-of-the-rights-of-
offended-parties-and-the-constitutional-rights-of-the-accused-inthe-context-of-sex-scandals/
[4] Supra note 29, Rule 2, §1; See also supra note 28, §6(e). As cited in Mendoza, C. (2012). Balancing of
Interest in the Digital Age: Protection of Rights of Offended Parties and the Constitutional Rights of the
Accused in the Context of Sex Scandals. Philippine Law Journal, 86.
[6] Ailyn Cortez, Sex Scandals and Cyber Sex Informations (2007), available at
http://www.shvoong.com/law-and-politics/1683049-sex-scandals-cyber-sex-informations/