Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Good and Bad Annotated Bib Discussion Post
Good and Bad Annotated Bib Discussion Post
March 2, 2023
ENC 1102
Professor Gonzalez
The most noticeable difference between the good examples and bad examples is the
length of the annotations. The good examples are significantly longer and more in depth than the
bad examples and include more information. The good examples also include in text citations
after paraphrasing whereas the bad examples provide no citations. Another important aspect of
the good annotated bibliography was that the sections of the annotation were separated by titles
such as “Summary”, “Evaluation”, and “Reflection”. This makes it easier to comprehend the
annotation, another way to separate the different parts of a bibliography is by having separate
paragraphs. The bad examples have no separate sections and only have one paragraph of
annotations that do not go into depth enough to truly show an understanding of the article. The
bad annotation also used a quote but didn’t cite it at all which is technically plagiarism and can
be taken as academic dishonesty. I like how the good example separates the topics it discusses
and how it makes it significantly easier to both read but also to write. For my annotations I used
the method where I separated the two parts of my annotation into different paragraphs which is
similar to this where it makes it easy to read and analyze. Overall, the biggest difference between
the good and bad examples of annotated bibliographies are length and depth of research. If you
actually read the article there is no problem making a good annotated bibliography as long as you