Ve SEN OR WW AWG vous 4

\ Kn oS Kil AIAG ( Ic SUP OQ Dated: January 27, 2021

Commissioner of Railway Safety,
N.E. Circle, Head Office, nee Uh
(Ministry of Civil Aviation), . yy | oo \
2 Floor Computer Building, Ltd * yor! /
ORM Office Campus, an
Hazratganj -
Lucknow Fax: @522 - 2234538 )
SUB: - Work oaf:-
(1) Provision of closure of LC- gate no. 47’C’ in lieu of RUB at
KM 36/8-9 between KWW-AWG stations in BARHAN-ETAH section of
PRAYAGRA) division.
(11) Provision of closure of LC- gate no. 5@’C’ in lieu of RUB at
KM 41/2-3 between AWG-VSR stations in BARHAN-ETAH section
of PRAYAGRA) division.
(iii) Provision of closure of LC- gate no. 52’C’ in lieu of RUB at
KM 42/7-8 between AWG-VSR stations in BARHAN-ETAH section
of PRAYAGRAJ division.
(iv) Provision of closure of LC- gate no. 55’C’ in lieu of RUB at
KM 44/9-45/0 between VSR-JWK stations in BARHAN-ETAH section
of PRAYAGRAJ division.
In reference to subject works, four applications along with the
following documents are put up for consideration for CRS Sanction.
1. CRS Application in two copies each.
>. Check List in one copy each (Engg. )
3. Engg. Scale Plan No.- NCR/ALD/DRM/PLAN No. 193/2020.
A. Engg. Scale Plan No.- NCR/ALD/DRM/PLAN No. 194/2020.
S. Engg. Scale Plan No.- NCR/ALD/DRM/PLAN No. 195/2020.
6. Engg. Scale Plan No.- NCR/ALD/DRM/PLAN No. 196/2020.
7. D.M. certificate of gate closure each.
It is requested that necessary CRS sanction may kindly be
accorded.
DA: As above. ait + >
ie 5 ee Cor (Mohit Chandra)
° whey a \ Divisional Railway Manager
sae 9 N.C. Railway/Prayagraj
ae
yee”
3
Ww
€
J
PP-]
Sub :- The work of
1. Provisic ~ closure of TC. op lesa -
AW or closure al HC Bate no. 47’'C’ in liew of RUB at KM 36/8-9 between KWW-
rstavions in BARHAN-ETAIL section of PRAYAGRAJ division.
dr 11 ¥ “rae : mr . .
2. Provision of closure of LC- gate no. 50'C’ in lieu of RUB at KM 41/2-3 between AWG-VSR
stations in BARHAN-ETAH section of PRAYAGRA] division.
3. Provision of closure of LC- gate no. 52°C’ in lieu of RUB at KM 42/7-8 between AWG-VSR
stations in BARHAN-ETAH section of PRAYAGRAJ division.
4. Provision of closure of LC- gate no. 55’C’ in lieu of RUB at KM 44/9-45/0 between VSR-
JWK stations in BARHAN-ETAH section of PRAYAGRA] division.
In connection with above subject CRS application between KWW-AWG, VSR-JWK &
VSR-JWK stations have been prepared for clouser of level crossing are placed at SN-223,
put
up for kind signature please.
COS/Works
Sr.DEN/V/PRYJ |
DRM/PRYJ
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
1. NAME OF WORK =:- The work of “ Provision of closure of LC- gate no. 47'C’ in lieu of
RUB at KM 36/8-9 between KWW-AWG stations in BARHAN-
ETAH section of PRAYAGRAJ division.
2. NECESSITY OF WORK:- As per Railway Board policy.
3. MODUS OPERANDI:- The work will be done as per Engg. plan No. NCR/PRYJ/DRM/
| PlanNo. 193/2020.
( Sudhir Kumar)
Sr. DEN/V/PRY/J
CHECK LIST
1. Descriptive Note Whether descriptive note includes description of work with — Yes —
_ ee Engineering work. | :
2 ESP (Yard plan) (i) Whether the ESP has the drawing no. of PCE’s office? NO”
“nether 2iteration, if eny, with full particulars in red on
the existing plan has been shown? |
(ii) Whether the colour codes as mentioned in plan has been
| | Strictly followed? (Additional/deletion ‘shifting of lines, i |
points, signals, track, circuits etc. should be clearly |
| : highlighted in ESP,SIP, Panel diagram, ST/LT and related ) .
| documents.)
: 3. Min Diagram Whether @ mini Diagram indicating existing and proposed | NA
1 rk has been enclosed? _
| 4. North direction Whether north direction of the station has been shown on the | Yes
ESP
| 2. SIP Indicate type interlocking as existing (and proposed if the NA
| ! involves change of interlocking) in the yard, with number of
| : routes.
6. ESP Whether any new reverse curve is being introduced in the NA
| ! yard on main line due to proposed work? If yes then indicate
! why it cannot be avoided? |
| 7. Approvals Whether all drawings have name and designation and date of | Yes
i the officers who have signed it? |
8. Nomenclature of Whether designations and serial numbers of all lines and
tracks sidings with direction of traffic (UP & DN lines) has been
! shown.
9. ESP Whether the names of nearest functions or terminal stations | NA
| on either side with length of block section including branch |
| line /mid section sidings, if any, has been shown.
10. Infringement Whether there is any infringement to IRSOD in the yard? If so | No
1 whether the reference of approval of competent authority has |
| been indicated in the plan in the tabular form?
'11. ICSR Whether CSR from FM to FM of all lines and sidings with
| | chainages has been shown. NY
; 12. Platforms Whether type of Platform (i.e. passenger or Goods) with | NA
| 3 length and width and their heights above rail level has been
| ! shown. Whether any Platform is located on curve sharper than
| | 2 degree? If yes the same should be indicated. Whether there |
| is possibility to modify/avoid PF on curve sharper than 2
! 3 degree?
13. Sidings “Whether ano Gdig nos ocr ce eee
2 | reuner any siding JOINS a passenger line on a grade steeper Not exist
ati ‘ oat Ves. than) whether Railway Board's condo 7
quon obtaine ‘Oueh CRC . ” :

_ Esp ed through CRS and approval has been shown in

14. Gradients Ss Whether thor ioe ee ee ee ee ae

nae there is a sleeper gradient beyond permissible limit NA
within 45 meters. Bevond outdoor most point, catch siding/slip

= Siding shall be provided.

. (Gradien - |W ; — ~
a ts & ‘hether it has been ensure that there is no change of grades NA
vithin 30 meters of any points or crossings and there is no i
Sin hange of cant within 20 meter of points and crossings?
1S [Hselation hether isolation as per rules for opening railways Ch VII NA
17 Landt tem 36(5 &6) and SEM Para 7.73. ] have been provided?
hether railway land boundary with distant from main line has Yes
been shown?
is ridges in yard hether complete description of bridges with chain ages have
been shown
LC gates in Whether list of all LC gates in the block section on either side NA
Dlock Section on jof the station has been given in tabulated from along with the
Doth side nformation such as LC Gate No. its location /Kms,
lassification, manned/unmanned & interlocked/non
interlocked.
20. [LC gates __in Whether LC gate within station yard is clear of all running NA
Station yard lines, loop lines, dead ends and siding?

21. Chainages ether chainages of points, trap, fouling mark (FM) gradient NA
posts, signals, bridges/culverts, central line of station building
etc have been mentioned?

22. § hether CSR & CSL of all running lines & siding. inter signal NA
distances & aspect control chart or colour light signals has been
mentioned in SIP.

23. § Jhether type of block working with adjacent stations & NA

location of block instruments has been shown on SIP.

24. [solation hether trap point with isolation as required, open away from NA :
he important running lines?

25. Overlaps hether length of overlaps/dead end to be of 120 Mtrs for NA

MACLS 180mts core LQ core signal overlap have been |

|
ensured?

;.°°4.|

26 urnouts hether trap/turnout 1.e whether | in 8.5, l in 12 or | in 16 NA

rossover for passenger lines, goods lines, siding ete has been
.i

mentioned in the plan. ——

hether the gradient is continuously steeper than 1 in 260 NA

27. radients “ in Si di ce territory and

between distant and home in single istance te \
setween inner distant and home signal in double distant

erritory. i
ma
Se a ee
“8 Stop Signal “ hether any stop signal has been located immediately train to NA |
Stop aller a bridge (to prevent on the Bridge potion when signal
is at ON
29 Dispensation con Whether. the applications have been submitted with the copies NA
a) TSAA Whether, TSAA has been submitted for any one work of the] = NA |
application.
31 SIGNALS Whether, any signal has right hand side ? If so whether GM NA
Approval has been obtaining for flashing the signal of right
! hand side.
52 Deviation from Whether there is any deviation GR requiring dispensation? If NA
GR yes whether it has been mention on SIP along with the approval
: of the competent authority ?
33. Sand humps In case of sand hump, Whether RDSO drawing number has peep NA
mentioned in ESP & SIP.
34 Commencement ‘Whether a certificate has been submitted by the applicant for NA
; of the work that the work, for which the application is made, has not been
: , started? In case a part work is completed before application,
: | 'Whether the same has been written with reasons ?
'35 Existing layout Whether, existing yard layout has been checked for curvature, NA
! | clearance, Track center, Turnout & turn in curves, Gradient
| etc? If not, reason may be brought out.
36 Separate enlarge (1)Whether, the relevant portion of proposed work involving NA
! portion of turnout cross over or any other complex geometry has been
! proposed layout separately plotted on larger scale. Annotating all important
| | Geometrical parameter by like radius, length of curve/straight,
. angle etc. .
(2) Whether, soft copy of plot has also been submitted.
: 37. Soft copy ether a soft copy of ESP has also been submitted?
ical note | AG officer? [NA
38 Technical note Whether a technical note is attached from S
34 Yard layout in In case the vard work is part of. , _ = ~ Oo
connection with doubling eauge CONN ersion hen re a major project ot NA .
rojec : ; !
Feet (1) eeerhatteutenmen and details seculon of the | :
| | (ii) Whether the a ved “ “ open Tine (I IQ) !
, of the nroject te ane copy of complete alignment |
; a S attached with other application. |
a reference Of same may be given.
Qi) Whether a brief description of the overall Project
| _ has been enclosed with the application?
| | (iv) Whether the standard layout as per railway Board's
letter = no.2015/SIG/WO/Standard layout — dated
| 12.07.2017 has been followed?
| (v) In case answer of (iv) is no, then whether a detailed
justification with RB’s approval has been obtained
Past a , and the same has been attached with the application?
ase work Whether the proposed work is a phase work of final NA
| lan? If ves whether the phase work has been planned as
f it is a complete separate work in itself and all
documents have been prepared accordingly?
41 [Temporary work Whether the proposed work is temporary? If so the No
period by which permanent work will be executed may
e indicated? Details of permanent work should also be
indicated in the descriptive note in the separate para?
and CSTE (PLG)? Ref railway Board’s letter No.
016/SIG/Drg of 01 Dated 09.11.2017.
:
as actual measurement dimensions as existing on field?
If not reason may be brought out?
44 Constraints and Whether there is any permanent speed restriction existing NA
speed restriction due to any constraint in the yard? If so the details may be
piven? It should be indicate whether the constraint can be
emoved and whether there is any plan to remove the
onstraint?
45 Special Thether there is any special precaution to be observed in NA
nrecautions the yard as per existing SWR? If yes please sive details.
hether any special is proposed to be imposed due to
proposed work? If yes whether the details have been
submitted?
(Sudhir Kumar)
Sr.DEN/V/PRYJ